Michelin
Michelin
Michelin
Group- 9 MrityunjayBasak, 17/094 PragatiSrivastava, 17/104 Pratyasha Ray Burman, 17/106 Sweta Satpathy , 17/118 VenkateshBalakrishnan, 17/124
Key Issues
What
defines Indian tyre market? How to form strategic groups? Which segment is easiest to enter? Which segment is closest to Michelins global strategy?
Birla 7%
Apollo 21%
Michelin 19%
Bridgestone 18%
RECENT TRENDS
Strong growth in 2,3 & 4 wheelers total production doubled from 1994-2004 7-8% expected growth 20072015
TECHNOLOGY
Cross-ply or Diagonal (D) good for rough terrain, long expectancy, unsafe and fuel inefficiency Radial (R) low expectancy, low absorption, safe, and fuel efficient D had 65% market dominated commercial market R 85% of cars, non existent in CV
MARKETS
OEM, Replacement and Export Indian market dependent on OEM (automobile) Global market more of replacement Decrease in profitability Replacement market many independent garages and a few company shops High tariffs on imports
PRODUCTS
CV (bus and truck), car, 2 and 3 wheeler LCV, OTR and agri vehicle tyres 2 wheeler 29%, 3 wheeler- 19%, CV 19%, Car- 17%, Others 10% 2&3 wheeler growing fast, similar Tubeless growing by 20%, highly profitable
COMPETITION
40 brands, 70 million tyres Four main brands JK, Ceat, MRF and Apollo which account for 75% International brands are weak MRF- leader in CV, car, 2 & 3 wheelers JK- leader in CV, big player in car Ceat- widest range and Shoppe Apollo esport orientation and wide distribution
Power of Buyers
Competitive rivalry
Only substitute is walking or animal transport, ship, trains Public transport will reduce need for tyres LOW
Capital intensive, low margins Tough for new players to break in and sustain
HIGH
Availability of substitute
Entry Barriers
12 10
21, 10
20.5, 8
8 VALUE 14, 7
7, 6
5 10
6 15 4 2 20 17.2, 4
20.3, 6 25 Value
0 PRODUCT VARIETY
1. 2. 3. 4.
Diagonal
Established players Stagnating markets Availability of cheap substitutes (Chinese) Only for heavy commercial vehicles & agricultural vehicles
1. 2. 3. 4.
Commercial Vehicles
Price is a priority here Speeds are low, so problem of safety isnt there Need long distance Cross-ply can be retreaded many times
1. 2. 3. 4.
Tubed
1.
OEM
2.
3.
Dropping prices due to price wars Less brand conscious There are established long term relationships
Radial
Radialization in cars 28% to 85% (1995-2005)
2 and 3 wheelers
Highest growth rate 2 wheelers 7.3% growth Large market shares
Tubeless
20% growth yearly Sales by volume 6.3%
OEM/Replacement
Commercial vehicles- replacement is leader (by market share) Personal vehicles OEM is leader (by market share)
LCV,
Power of Buyers
Competitive rivalry
No substitutes available Public transport will reduce need for tyres LOW
Capital intensive, low margins High technology requirements and specialized technology VERY HIGH
Availability of substitute
Entry Barriers
Justification
We have chosen this based on Michelins global advantagesinnovation Technologically advanced radial system Organizational values and structure will support high tech products No commercial vehicles which run on diagonal Higher margins- initially we will be a low volume, high margin product Initially enter replacement market which is brand conscious OEM takes time to form relationships Tubeless is higher technology and faster growing product- it is the future Through technology transfers, they can bring latest tech to India targeting modern, brand conscious, performance oriented customer This segment will also avoid the price wars and threat of cheap substitutes (Chinese) Large number of independent dealers ensure company doesnt require entrenched distribution structure to enter replacement market Input costs for Michelin are much lower 24%