The Auteur Theory: Peter Wollen
The Auteur Theory: Peter Wollen
The Auteur Theory: Peter Wollen
peter wollen
GROUP 3 FILM THEORIES
Autuer
\-tr\ noun
1 : French for author 2 : an artist (as a musician or writer) whose style and practice are distinctive
Many would define the autuer theory as the theory where the director is the author of the film, but Wollen states that the auteur theory does not limit itself to acclaiming the directore as the main author of the film.
The auteur theory was never elaborated in programmatic terms and could be interpreted and applied on rather broad lines. In time,
The auteur
&
works has a semantic dimension, not purely formal The meaning of the film is constructed a posteriori
Geoffrey Nowell-Smith:
One essential corollary of the theory as it has been developed is the discovery that the defining characteristics of an authors work are not necessarily those which are most readily apparent. The purpose of criticism thus becomes to uncover behind the superficial contrasts of subject and treatment a hard core of basic and often recondite motifs. The pattern formed by these motifs... is what gives an authors work its particular structure, bith defining it internally and distinguishing one body of work from another.
Test case:
Howard Hawks
Has worked for many years within the Hollywood system Made his first film Road to Glory in 1926 Has only received general critical acclaim for his war time film Sergeant York
His films exhibit the same thematic preoccupations, the same recurring motifs and incidents, the same visual style and tempo. Reducing the genres to two basic types:
Adventure Drama
Crazy Comedy
with Andrew Sarris and Molly Haskell at Moving Image Source. Here are a couple of brief quotes from Schwartzs introduction to the interview: If Howard Hawks didnt exist, auteurist film critics would have had to invent him. He was the epitome of the idiosyncratic, existential artist who worked undercover, disguised as a competent craftsman
with a clean, direct style. Hawks was equal parts entertainer and
intellectual; box office receipts rewarded the former, critical insight revealed the latter. The paradox of Hawks was that he toiled anonymously within the genres and conventions of the Hollywood system yet imbued every film with his distinctive personality and a worldview that valued professionalism and the collaborative spirit above all. "Not coincidentally, these two traits are essential to the filmmaking process, and the connection between Hawkss view of his own professionalism and that of his characters was clear to Andrew Sarris, who anointed the director as a member of the pantheon in his seminal book The American Cinema: Like his heroes, Hawks