ICET Presentation 1
ICET Presentation 1
ICET Presentation 1
* Presenter
Presentation Layout
Introduction
Motivation Background on Feature Selection
Proposed Technique
Ant Colony Optimization Symmetric Uncertainty
Experimentation Conclusion
Motivation
Why Feature Selection?
Curse of Dimensionality Three-fold benefits
Data Reduction
PROPOSED TECHNIQUE
Proposed Technique
Basic Ingredients of ACO
Graph Representation Heuristic Desirability Positive feedback process Constraint Satisfaction Solution Construction mechanism
10
11
Symmetric Uncertainty
12
ACO-SU
EXPERIMENTATION
14
Experimentation Framework
All the experiments are performed using 10-Fold Cross Validation and results of ten runs are averaged. Proposed method is compared with four other feature selection algorithms.
Performance Metrics:
Number of Features Selected. Predictive Classification Accuracy using 10-FCV.
15
Experimentation Framework
SNO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dataset * Iris Liver Disorder Diabetes Breast Cancer- W Vote Labor Hepatitis Colic-Horse Ionosphere Lymph Dermatology Lung Cancer Audiology Total Features 4 6 8 9 16 16 19 22 34 18 34 56 69 Instances 150 345 768 699 435 57 155 368 351 148 366 32 226 Classes 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 24
16
Experimentation Framework
Parameters Number of Ants Alpha Beta Evaporation Rate Max. Epochs Path Convergence Threshold Values 20 1 1 0.15 500 50
17
Experiment
18
Experiment
19
Experiment
20
Total
4 6 8 9 16 16 19 22 34 18 69 34 32
ACO-SU
2 2 2 4 6 6 7 6 9 7 20 12 25
21
22
Conclusion
We have proposed an efficient feature selection method based on SI and filter method techniques. Proposed method is extensively experimented over a number of benchmark datasets and classifiers. ACO-SU yields better results as compared to other SI based feature selection methods considered in the study. ACO-SU outperformed other methods in terms of predictive classification accuracy and number of features selected.
23
Thank You
Questions?