NTPCLLL - Edit2
NTPCLLL - Edit2
NTPCLLL - Edit2
Financial Analysis
Powerpoint Templates
Presented By:
Acknowledgement
We would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to Mr. Puneet Bhushan Sood for taking out the time to critically analyze our presentation and for continuously suggesting improvements which led us to this final product.
Special resolution passed by the Shareholders at the Companys Annual General Meeting on September 23, 2005 and the approval of the Central Government under section 21 of the Companies Act, 1956, the name of the Company "National Thermal Power Corporation Limited" has been changed to "NTPC Limited" with effect from October 28, 2005.
Power Generation
Performance Statistics
In terms of operations, NTPC has always been considerably above the national average. The availability factor for coal based power stations has increased from 89.32% in 1998-99 to 91.62% in 2010-11, which compares favourably with international standards. The PLF has increased from 76.6% in 1998-99 to 88.29% during the year 2010-11.
The table below shows that while the installed capacity has increased by 73.33% in the last twelve years the generation has increased by 101.39%.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
1998-99
2010-11
% OF INCREASE
Installed Capacity
MW
17,786
30,830
73.33
Generation
MUs
1,09,505
2,20,540
101.39
Turnaround Capability
Badarpur (705 MW) Unchahar (420 MW) Talcher (460 MW) Tanda (440 MW)
Objective
Implementation of distributed generation projects using locally available renewable resources such as biomass, wind, solar, micro hydel, bio-fuel etc. Training & capacity building of local community to enable them to independently manage, operate & maintain the plant. To ensure viability and long term sustainability of DG projects Integrated growth & development of rural areas by enhancing employment education, income generation & livelihood opportunities To ensure implementation of various technologies as demo/pilot project
Installed Capacity
NO. OF PLANTS NTPC Owned Coal 15 28,195 3,955 CAPACITY (MW)
Gas/Liquid Fuel
Total
22
32,150
Owned By JVs
Coal & Gas Total 6 28 3,864 36,014
Awards
NTPC has been bestowed the honour of being most respected company in Power Sector for the year 2011 by Businessworld. Good Corporate Citizen Award has been given to NTPC for its outstanding achievement. Environment Awards: Golden Peacock Environment Management Award -2008 Top Rankers Excellence Award 2011 in the Best Finance Professional category. Aon Hewitt Best Employers in India 2011 Study of Best Employers ranked the NTPC at 6th. The prestigious Golden Peacock Award-2011 for Corporate Social Responsibility at 6th.
Environment Friendly
While leading the nations power generation league, NTPC has remained committed to the environment. It continues to take various pro-active measures for protection of the environment and ecology around its projects. NTPC was the first among power utilities in India to start Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) studies and reinforced it with Periodic Environmental Audits and Reviews.
We have used Ratio and Common Size Statement Analysis method for our Financial Statement Analysis of NTPC Limited.
RATIO ANALYSIS
Liquidity Ratio Leverage Ratio Turnover Ratio Profitability Ratio Expense Ratio
Liquidity Ratio
2006
Current ratio Quick ratio Cash ratio
1.4868 1.2146 0.9759
2007
1.7153 1.4792 1.2363
2008
1.6577 1.4525 1.1329
2009
1.8549 1.6239 1.1415
2010
1.4096 1.2355 0.7411
2011
1.4989 1.3251 0.7619
A firm should ensure that it does not suffer from lack of Liquidity and also that it does not have excess liquidity.
2.0000 1.8000 1.6000 1.4000 1.2000 1.0000 0.8000 current ratio quick ratio cash ratio
0.6000
0.4000 0.2000 0.0000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
As we know that current ratio of 2:1 or more is considered satisfactory. There is NO year in which ratio is 2:1. So it may be interpreted to be insufficiently liquid. Comparatively 2009 has ratio of 1.85, which shows better short-term solvency than other years.
All years having ratio of more than 1:1, which represent a satisfactory current financial condition. Year 2009 had a ratio of 1.62:1, So, in this year company could suffer from a shortage of funds if it had slow paying and long-duration outstanding debtors
Years 2010 and 2011 show the lack of cash in the company, but due to companys reserve borrowing power, there is nothing to worry.
Leverage Ratio
2006 2007
0.7342 9.3731
2008
0.7825 9.9689
2209
0.7664 11.7603
2010
0.8845 11.6526
2011
0.8667 10.5616
0.7399 11.3584
14.0000
12.0000
10.0000
4.0000
2.0000
0.0000
2006 2007 2008 2209 2010 2011
2007
0.7342
2008
0.7825
2209
0.7664
2010
0.8845
2011
0.8667
2007
9.3731
2008
9.9689
2209
11.7603
2010
11.6526
2011
10.5616
Turnover Ratio
2006 ITR DTR Av. Collection Ratio (Days) Asset turnover ratio Fixed Assets Ratio Current Assets Ratio
11.3764 12.9792
2007
13.3739 12.5498
2008
14.1925 8.8444
2009
13.9958 6.1060
2010
13.9334 4.8336
2011
15.5640 4.6117
28 0.3573
1.1643 2.0827
29 0.3834
1.2793 1.7759
41 0.3884
1.4276 1.7045
59 0.3794
1.2744 1.5875
74 0.3763
1.3410 1.6947
78 0.3986
1.4064 1.7327
It measures how efficiently the assets are employed by the firm. These ratios are also called as efficiency ratios. The efficiency of assets would be reflected in the speed with which it is converted into sales. The greater is the rate of turnover, the efficient is the utilisation / management.
18.0000
16.0000
14.0000 12.0000 10.0000 8.0000 6.0000 4.0000 2.0000 0.0000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ITR DTR
ITR indicates the efficiency of the firm in producing and selling its product. In year 2008 and 2011 it is calculated that inventory is turning into receivables through sales in better speed then other years. Year 2006 shows slow-moving inventory.
2006 DTR
12.9792
2007
12.5498
2008
8.8444
2009
6.1060
2010
4.8336
2011
4.6117
3.0000
2.5000 Av. Collection Ratio (months) Asset turnover ratio Fixed Assets Ratio
2.0000
1.5000
1.0000
0.5000
Profitability Ratio
2006 2007 2008 2009
0.2801
2010
0.2677
2011
0.2349
0.2933
0.2918
0.2954
0.2165
0.2092
0.1991
0.1954
0.1873
0.1650
Rate of return
Profit Margin Ratios It measures the relationship between profit and sales.
Rate of Return Ratios It reflects the relationship between profit and investment.
0.0000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Expense Ratio
2006 Selling Expenses Ratio COGS Expense Ratio Operating Exp. Ratio
0.0161 0.9121 1.6348
2007
0.0259 0.9252 1.6494
2008
0.0196 0.9295 1.6404
2009
0.0163 0.9286 1.6976
2010
0.0153 0.9282 1.6780
2011
0.0132 0.9357 1.6951
Expense ratios are important to consider when choosing a fund, as they can significantly affect returns. Factors influencing the expense ratio include the size of the fund (small funds often have higher ratios as they spread expenses among a smaller number of investors), sales charges, and the management style of the fund.
0.0300
0.0250
0.0150
0.0100
0.0050
0.0000
1.8000 1.6000 1.4000 1.2000 1.0000 0.8000 COGS Expense Ratio Operating Exp. Ratio
0.6000
0.4000
0.2000
0.0000
Rate of Return
0.2500
0.2000
0.1500
0.1000
0.0500
0.0000
0.4000
0.3000 0.2000 0.1000 0.0000
DUPONT ANALYSIS
RONA (or ROCE) is the measure of the firms operating performance. It indicates the firms earning power. It is a product of the asset turnover, gross profit margin and operating leverage. RONA can be computed as follows:
For the year 2007 the GPM=0.2918 ATR=0.3834 & operating leverage=1.839 & their product equals to 0.2058 which is RONA for that year. All the firms would like to improve their RONA. In practice , however, competition puts a limit on RONA. Also, firms may have to trade off between asset turnover and gross profit margin. A firm can convert its RONA into an impressive ROE through financial efficiency. Net Profit = Net Profit Sales Total assets Equity Sales Total assets Equity ROE NPM TATR 1 / (1- DR)
.
Income statement items-expressed as percentage of total sales Balance sheet items-expressed as percentage of total assests
2006 Sales Income from financial services Income from treasury operations Income from nonfinancial services Other income Provision for direct tax Rent & lease rent Raw materials, stores & spares Miscellaneous expenditure
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
268,813.00 328,089.00 372,481.00 419,728.00 466,109.00 551,766.00 28,181.00 26,259.00 29,708.00 3,868.00 1,737.00 1,773.00 31,597.00 1,918.00 26,378.60 660.5 23,467.70 313.4
484
1,536.00
674
1,162.00
1,132.00
1,539.00
1,417.00
1,308.00 25,547.00 596
1,641.40
2,427.80 26,799.70 747.4
1,810.30
1,738.20 26,305.40 810
1,057.00
1,189.00
1,100.00
1,678.00
1,474.50
2,328.30
2006 Income from financial services Income from treasury operations Income from nonfinancial services Other income Provision for direct tax Rent & lease rent Raw materials, stores & spares Miscellaneous expenditure
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
5.65932 4.2531979
0.065473 0.062178 0.147122 0.1419967 0.1603488 0.1468014 61.06513 60.47688 58.22015 63.655987 62.18303 63.130584
2006 Total assets Plant & machinery, computers and electrical assets Inventories Cash & bank balance Land
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2006 Plant & machinery, computers and electrical assets Inventories Cash & bank balance Land
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
24.58267
24.21879
21.75226
23.912212
22.482178
23.03537
3.140738
2.972552
2.821197
2.9764041
2.7433993
2.667515
11.26008
15.56058
15.5718
14.709895
11.673551
11.693541
1.68541
1.588244
1.63985
1.8432117
1.7501753
1.628797
SWOT ANALYSIS
S:STRENGTH W:WEAKNESS O:OPPURTUNITY T:THREAT
SWOT analysis (alternately SLOT analysis) is a strategic planning method used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses/Limitations, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business venture. It involves specifying the objective of the business venture or project and identifying the internal and external factors that are favourable and unfavourable to achieve that objective.
Strengths: characteristics of the business, or project team that give it an advantage over others Weaknesses (or Limitations): are characteristics that place the team at a disadvantage relative to others Opportunities: external chances to improve performance (e.g. make greater profits) in the environment Threats: external elements in the environment that could cause trouble for the business or project
STRENGTH
Spread across the country Dominant Market Share Consistent Growth Operational efficiency Human Resources
Dominant Market Share More than one-fourth of Indias generation with one-fifth capacity The next largest power utility owns 7.5% of market share in terms of capacity and 7.6% of share in terms of units generated
Human Resources
24,375 highly trained employees. Planned interventions at various stages of career Knowledge sharing & development through various HR initiative
WEAKNESS
Disposal of Rejects For every 1% reduction in Ash, Yield drops by about 4% Availability of Basic Infrastructure No Control on Input Coal Quality. Decision Process is very slow.
OPPORTUNITY
The company has taken many steps like step-up its recruitment, reviewing feasibilities of various sites for project implementations etc. and has been quite successful till date. NTPC will invest about Rs 20,000 crore to set up a 3,900-megawatt (Mw) coal-based power project in Madhya Pradesh. Company will also start coal production from its captive mine in Jharkhand in 201112, for which the company will be investing about Rs 1,800 crore.
THREAT
India, as a developing country is characterised by increase in demand for electricity and as of moment the power plants are able to meet only about 6075% of this demand on an yearly average. The only way to meet the requirement completely is to achieve a rate of power capacity addition (implementing power projects) higher than the rate of demand addition. NTPC strives to achieve this and undoubtedly leads in sharing this burden on the country.
Conclusion
Company should come up with better management of its credit. Companys sales generating rate is constantly increasing. Being the dominant leader in the market, company should keep its growth consistent as in future there will be a lot of demand for power in our country and it should invest in such a way that it gets the maximum output of its policies. Company should overtake the demanded power output so as to increase its profits.