Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development Hand Outs
Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development Hand Outs
Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development Hand Outs
Reported by:
Cognitive Group
There Are Three Basic Components To Piaget's Theory: 1. 2. Schemas Processes that enable the transition from one stage to another Equilibrium Assimilation Accommodation Stages of Development: Sensorimotor Stage (from birth to 2 Years) Preoperational Stage (2 to 7 Years) Concrete Operational Stage (7 to 11 Years) Formal Operational Stage (11 Years & Beyond)
not like to be frustrated and will seek to restore balance by mastering the new challenge (accommodation). Once the new information is acquired the process of assimilation with the new schema will continue until the next time we need to make an adjustment to it.
3. *INTRODUCTION Jean Piaget (1896 1980) was employed at the Binet Institute in the 1920s, where his job was to develop French versions of questions on English intelligence tests. He became intrigued with the reasons children gave for their wrong answers on the questions that required logical thinking. He believed that these incorrect answers revealed important differences between the thinking of adults and children. Piaget's Theory Differs From Others In Several Ways: o It is concerned with children, rather than all learners. o It focuses on development, so it does not address learning of information or specific behaviors. o It proposes discrete stages of development, marked by qualitative differences, rather than a gradual increase in number and complexity of behaviors, concepts, ideas, etc. Goals: o to explain the mechanisms and processes to infants & child To Piaget, cognitive development was a progressive reorganization of mental processes as a result of biological maturation and environmental experience. Children construct an understanding of the world around them, then experience discrepancies between what they already know and what they discover in their environment.
B.
*SCHEMAS Piaget called the schema the basic building block of intelligent behavior a way of organizing knowledge. Indeed, it is useful to think of schemas as units of knowledge, each relating to one aspect of the world, including objects, actions and abstract (i.e. theoretical) concepts. When a child's existing schemas are capable of explaining what it can perceive around it, it is said to be in a state of equilibrium, i.e. a state of cognitive (i.e. mental) balance. *ASSIMILATION, ACCOMMODATION & EQUILIBRIUM o o Assimilation which is using an existing schema to deal with a new object or situation. Accommodation this happens when the existing schema (knowledge) does not work, and needs to be changed to deal with a new object or situation. Equilibration this is the force, which moves development along. Piaget beloved that cognitive development did not progress at a steady rate, but rather in leaps and bounds. Equilibrium is occurs when a child's schemas can deal with most new information through assimilation. However, an unpleasant state of disequilibrium occurs when new information cannot be fitted into existing schemas (assimilation). Equilibration is the force which drives the learning process as we do *EXAMPLES: Assimilation - A 2 year old child sees a man who is bald on top of his head and has long frizzy hair on the sides. To his fathers horror, the toddler shouts Clown, clown (Sigler et al., 2003). Accommodation In the clown incident, the boys father explained to his son that the man was not a clown and that even though his hair was like a clowns, he wasnt wearing a funny costume and wasnt doing silly things to make people laugh With this new knowledge, the boy was able to change his schema of clown and make this idea fit better to a standard concept of clown. According to Piaget, teaching can support these developmental processes by *STAGES OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT A. Sensorimotor Stage (from birth to 2 Years) C.
explores the word as little experiments & develop schemas through the senses & motor activities discovers relationships between their actions & consequence an important concept acquired at this stage is object permanence Before 8 months, the baby will stop searching for an object if it is covered. This is known as the "out of sight, out of mind" phenomenon. Around 8 months, the baby will physically search for the hidden object indicating that he or she already has a mental representation of the object (this is known as object permanence) Preoperational Stage (2 to 7 Years) on top of object permanence, the ability for symbolic thinking emerges this is seen from the child's use of symbolic play & use of language use of language/words as symbols for things particularly has critical importance in this stage it is better to let a child at this stage play, with unstructured materials to help facilitate his/her symbolic thinking despite all these development the child still has limitations such as: Ego centrism- inability to consider another person's point of view Animism- all things are living & capable of intentions, feelings & consciousness Inability to decenter or inability to focus on simultaneous thoughts at the same time Inability for conservation concepts, inability to follow transformations mentally Concrete Operational Stage (7 to 11 Years) less egocentric, can now imagine other people's point of view now aware that events outside of the self have causes outside of the self thinking begins to be more logical but still limited to concrete
experience (can make judgements based on stimuli that are present to the senses) can perform more operations ex. counting, classifying and thus can understand better principles of conversation ex. conversation of numbers, mass ,weight, height Formal Operational Stage (11 Years & Beyond) hypothetical-deductive reasoning develops and the child can now reason logically & deal with abstractions, not just concrete things capacity for abstractions enables person to use & understand algebraic sings &metaphorical speech able to consider all variables & possibilities systematically use pendulum problem to test formal operational thinking
FIN --,
D.