ex designedasia.com/final/A Whole New Breed.

pdf

A WHOLE NEW BREED? DESIGNERSCOMPETENCIES IN THE TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED, CROSS-CULTURAL GLOBALIZED WORLD

!
Ricky, Yuk-kwan Ng
Centre for Learning and Teaching, Vocational Training Council, Hong Kong, [email protected]

ABSTRACT
This paper looks into the current challenges that design profession and education are confronting under the technology enhanced global economy and business market. Framing design practices

into the technology, globalization/glocalization and cross-cultural management discourses, this paper addresses these impacts on design profession and education. This paper also aims to explore

the new competencies of designers and to exam how design curricula cope with the sector changes. Views and perspectives on the issues were collected from a representative of a leading international brand consultancy company, a multimedia design consultant/representative of a Hong Kong designer membership accreditation association; and an experienced art director of a Hong Kong advertising agency/former representative of a British designer chartered body. In response to their

views, one of Hong Kongs leading design institutes curricula was studied to explore its strategies on nurturing the new breed of designers. Last but not least, this paper also purports to shed light to

design educators and practitioners for the purpose to enhance designers competencies and thus to increase their competencies in order to work in the globalized cross-cultural markets.

! !

"!

Keywords: Design Education, Designers Competencies, Globalization/Glocalization, Cross-Cultural Management!

INTRODUCTION
Changes in economic, cultural, social-political and technology have shaped and re-shaped our world over the past decades. Guttal (2007) once states that advancements in applied

sciences, technology, and communications have played central roles in making globalization possible (Guttal, 2007, p. 524). As design practices are strongly situated and influenced by

social, technological and cultural context (Frayling, 1993); it has come to noticed that the design industry and competencies of designers are drastically challenged by the rapid changes from an industrial to post-industrial society; and from a modern to postmodern culture and currently, the changes from a globalized to a glocalized market. The raise of globalization

and glocalization initiated new and important challenges on the design industry and designers competencies. As the stage of globalization is hardly static, glocalization is being adapted as

an act to resist; to subvert or to revolt the globalization hegemony by a growing, worldwide movement whose base is made up of a wide diversity of people, ideas, cultures, languages, ages, professions, and competencies (Guttal, 2007, p. 530). Giulianotti and Robertson

(2007) state that the very creation of localities is a standard component of globalization (Giulianotti and Robertson, 2007, p. 134). Imbesi (2011) mentions design industry is

growing, expanding and entering new geographical areas under globalization; while at the same time, there is a need for a cultural asethetization and semantization of products for competitiveness (Imbesi, 2011, p.1). The above indicated that in order to cope with the In another

diversified users, design has to regard cultural issue as the major consideration.

aspect, Norman (2011) points to the point that nowadays designers should be able to work in broadly based, multidisciplinary teams with engineers, social scientists, economists, and business people and the two major missing components are social science and business (Norman, 2011, p.3). In a similar vein, Pink (2006) opines that nowadays, the graduate

attributes of Master of Business and Administration (MBA) and Master of Fine Arts (MFA) are equally important; this kind of cross disciplinary mind is what current entrepreneurs and designers needed to generate business strategies and creative ideas (Pink, 2006). Presumably, this new

breed of designers on one hand are design professionals possess with strong practical, design knowledge, skills and innovative design ideas while on the other equipped with competencies such as cross-cultural awareness, communication and management literacy in order to cope with the rapid changing design industry and the diversified clients in the globalized and glocalized markets. To

cope with the changes, there is an urge need to articulate the designers competencies whilst the

! !

#!

design curricular, modules and the specialties being taught in design schools to be taken into review so as to align with the industrys needs.

It is of interest to know the new professional competencies and qualities that a designer needs to possess under the rapid changing global and local markets. The questions remain, what are the How do design A close

designers new competencies to work in the globalized cross-cultural markets?

curricular cope with the with the design industrys needs in the global and local markets?

look into the above questions may reveal how design industry and education response to the rapid sector changes.

THE DESIGNERS NEW COMPETENCIES

Simon (1969) in his classic The Science of the Artificial mentions that design is changing existing situations into preferred ones (Simon, 1969). Design as seen by Kress (2000) is an essential

textual and pedagogic/political goal for periods characterized by intense and far-reaching changes. [it is] a metaphor for planning, organizing, and bringing to term a project realized within a set of revolving parameters (Kress, 2000, p.157). Doloughan (2002) states notions of design

incorporate the process of designing together with the designed product can be used as analytical tool to examine the problematic of re-presentation; that is to say that design practices stress emphasis on cultural context and subjective motivations of much scientific enquiry (Doloughan, 2002, p.60). Likewise, Friedman (2003) opines that process, goal-oriented along with problem

solving, are the three significant attributes of design to create new and useful deliverables to meet needs and improve situations (Friedman, 2003). From a sociologists perspective, Frascara (2004)

views design profession as knowledge creation in relation to social norms, value, culture, experience, belief and emotion (Frascara, 2004). Margolin (1988) claims that design studies is an interpretive

practice, rooted firmly in the techniques of humanities and the social science (Margolin, 1988, p. 43 to 47) and opines that design should play a broad role in society; and it will make a place for design discourse within the larger debates about social theory (Margolin, 1988, p. 6) especially under the rapid societal changes. He urges designers to equip with interdisciplinary knowledge such as social Margloin further proposes other than the

science, engineering and management (Margolin, 1988).

foundation knowledge of art and design, the hand and technological skills, the research, problem-solving and presentation skills, designer nowadays are in need of cross-disciplinary knowledge such as social science, engineering and management (Margolin, 1988). The merging of technologies and designs indeed produced successful products such as iphone, Dyson vacuum cleaner and air multiplier, Smart car and PS3, to name just a few. These products changed our life

styles and behaviors significantly but giving it another thought revealed that globalization awareness and marketing strategies are the underlying key elements for success. Furthermore, it is of

! !

$!

knowledge that in some of the prominent designer membership accreditation bodies, the professional membership assessment criteria mostly stressed on the designers aesthetic treatment, execution technique, and technological capabilities such as typographic treatment, colour senses, treatment of graphic space, art direction, designers personal styles and the eminence of design awards (Cheung, 2011, p.6). It is quite surprised that the assessment criteria still rests on

the visual application and process level and have not yet extended into the use of cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural knowledge in design practices. A number of studies have addressed the Other

increasing needs of the cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural knowledge in design practices.

than looking at design on the process and application levels, Anderson (1995) draws designers attention to cultures different interpretations on artwork and reminds that the share of design and composition features may not bear the same universal meanings amongst cultures. He proposes a

sequential model for the examination of cross-cultural artwork through the cycle of reaction, perceptual analysis and contextual examination followed by interpretations and synthesis to salient the hidden cultural meanings (Anderson, 1995). It is not surprised that very often, design share

the same forms, compositions whereas the connoted meanings vary amount cultures, a good understanding of particular living and visual culture is the challenge that designer constantly confronting in cross-cultural design project. A well awareness of the cross-cultural differences has

been regarded as the key to ensure smooth project planning, implementation and execution. Various studies have been conducted to examine cultural variations and dimensions in the cross-cultural context; for instance, Klukhohn and Strotbecks five core dimensions in cultural differences (Klukhohn and Strotbeck, 1961), Halls high-and low-context cultures (Hall, 1967), Hofestedes examination of international differences in work-related values (Hofestede, 1980) and Trompenaars cultural taxonomy (Trompenaars, 1993) are just a few. In views of the above,

cross-disciplinary knowledge such as sociology, management, marketing and cross-cultural awareness seems to be the new knowledge to broaden designers competencies in order to cope with the clients needs in the global and glocal markets. In sum, the above reveals that the drastic

changes in the design industry are resulted from three major factors, a) technological advancement, b) globalization/glocalization and c) cross-cultural practices; these factors have constituted the new design work competencies (Figure 1).

! !

%!

'()*+,-,./)0-!0120+)(3(+4!

!"#$%"&'()$#*+,$-*./"0")-'"&!

5-,60-/704/,+85-,)0-/704/,+!090:(+(;;!

<:,;;=)>-4>:0-!?:0)4/)(;!

Figure 1: New design work competencies

THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME: VIEWS FROM THE PRACTITIONERS

A number of notable suggestions to enhance designers competencies for working in the globalized cross-cultural markets were addressed by the panel speakers in SCADs Cross-cultural Design Mini Conference: Designers Professionalism in Global and Local Market (SCAD, 2011). The panel was

formed by a representative of a leading international brand consultancy company, a multimedia design consultant/representative of a Hong Kong designer membership accreditation association; and an experienced art director of a Hong Kong advertising agency/former representative of a British designer chartered body while the writer of this essay, a design educator/researcher, was the convener and moderator. With an aim to address the designers competencies under the rapid

changing global and glocal markets, the views of the conferences panel speakers are being drawn to articulate the three major factors a) technological advancement, b) globalization/glocalization and c) cross-cultural practices summarized from the literature.

! TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT! !
In the SCAD conference, the multimedia consultant opines that the emerging and the profusion of textual and visual information are the results of the advancement of information technologies. The

interactivity and instant nature of the world-wide-web benefits designers to think big and designing for a large global population on the internet. The technological advancement enabled design to

reach a vast amount of users from different countries and cultures; for instance, there are 6,930,055,154 internet users as of March, 2011 (Internet World Stats, 2011). The statistic shows

that designers, taking advantages of the technological advancement are now designing for a global population. In addition to keep abreast of technological advancements to cope with the users

behavioral changes, it is also important for designers to pay attention to the globalized and

! !

&!

glocalized markets for better understanding of the users experiences and life styles changes. Given the societal role of the design in the globalization era and the extent of the worldwide web as a means of design to enhance cross-boundary communications; the boundary crossing on internet is not merely a geographical one. Regardless of geographical constraints, the technological enabled It is also

time-based design also has significant impacts on the global and glocal markets.

presumably that additional attentions should be given to consumer behaviors, user-centered experiences in a cross-cultural context when designing for the vast internet population in the global and glocal markets. Roth (1999) opines that [In the world of Internet], usability issues are the key It is also

to successful interface design and interactive communications (Roth, 1999, p.21).

suggested that for a better understanding of the users cultures, experiences, life styles, consumer behaviors etc., designer should turn him/herself from a design specialist into a generalist, knowing a range of issues related to sociology, psychology, business and marketing, to name just a few in order to accommodate the cross-boundary users needs.

! GLOBALIZATION / GLOCALIZATION AWARENESS!

The open of the global markets; especially the flourishing China market in the 1990s has created promising business opportunities to a number of foreign design companies. Taking advantages of

the chances and Chinas open door policy, foreign design companies had begun to open up branches in Hong Kong and Mainland China to better cater their clients in China. The challenges for these

foreign design companies are keen right from the very beginning because of the competitions from a number of local china design companies. The consumers glocalized culture and experience are the One of the panel speakers shared her

key challenges confronting the foreign design companies.

views by stating the fact that a certain degree of glocalization is essential for an international company to maintain its competitiveness in the China market. Glocalization in her company starts

from the composition of the employees; her companys employees include 5% of Westerners, 35 % of Asians while 60 % are Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese. The mixture of the cross-cultural

talents possesses the advantages to generate multi-perspective and multi-dimensional design solutions for the glocal markets and better catering of the diversified clientele. Using one of her

companys recent projects in Mainland China as example, it is learnt that designers have to get good knowledge of the customers consumption behaviors, emotional and psychological feelings, consumers rights as well as the official regulations and the industrys common practices. For

example, in packaging design, simplified Chinese are essential to convey messages; the contents of the products must be clearly listed; any falsifying of the content information will lead to serious offenses not only to the manufacturer but also to the celebrities and speakers representing the brand and the product. Apparently, a good grip of the local societal knowledge and the glocalized culture

is the key to success for designers to work in the globalized cross-cultural markets.

! !

@!

CROSS-CULTURAL PRACTICES! !
Hofstede once states that culture is the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one human group from another that shapes our different perceptions and behaviors to our everyday life (Hofstede, 1980). between Western and Asian cultures. It is a dj vu that the discrepancies in business practices exist As designers, we all known that when tackling a design

problem, a scientific analysis is preferred and there is a strong emphasis on the designing process to generate ideas. To Westerners, design idea generation rests on a diagnostic level of what and why

while to Asian and mostly to Chinese, very often, it falls into the application level of what and how. Why a certain type of design successes and how to make a success is two sets of philosophies (Cheung, 2011). The speaker representing an international design company in the SCAD

mini-conference recalled once worked with a Mainland Chinese client and experienced the toughest moment in her career to educate her client the importance of the design process. In surprise, her

client complained that her scientific design process to analyze and generate ideas is too systematic, lack of flexibilities and time consuming, last but not least, the prolonged engagement of the client in the design process such as survey and presentations are not necessary. Her client reacted by

telling her that he/she know his/her companys products and services thoroughly inside and out and endeavour to provide her with his/her perspectives for the design directions. Communication is the It is

curial element in design practices, especially when collaborating with cross-cultural clients. believe that Hofstedes Cultural Dimension Model (1972) provides valuable references to

cross-cultural communications when working with clients from different cultural backgrounds.

His

most famous Cultural Dimension Model resulted from the survey undertaken around 1968 and 1972 within IBM subsidiaries in 66 countries of 11, 6000 employees sheds insights and draws awareness to consider the importance of cross-cultural context in the areas of 1) Power distance, 2) Uncertainty avoidance, 3) Individualism versus collectivism and 4) Masculinity versus femininity (Hofstede, 1972). Rather than strategies to please and appease the clients, cross-cultural communications are

acts of mutual understandings with respect to one anothers cultural practices so as to accommodate, to assimilate, to transform one anothers needs. The speakers in the SCAD

mini-conference in general stressed the importance of considering the cross-cultural factors in design services, claiming that a well awareness of cross-cultural management and industry practices are in need to better work with the clients not only in the globalized, but also in the glocalized markets. Knowing the cross-cultural differences is the key to ensure smooth project collaboration.

As a matter of fact, it is common to see that international design and advertising campaigns are always glocalized to a certain degree in order to cope with the particular cultural for success. Given

the views of the above, it is a burning issue for design educators to response to the industry changes and reconsiders their curricula in order to generate a whole new breed of designers.!

! !

A!

A PARADIGM SHIFT IN DESIGN EDUCATION

It is not surprised that traditionally, design curricula are designed to produce industry practitioners with strong practical skills to cater the needs for the industrial society. Other than the need of

specific skills workers, vocational education and training also stressed on generic skills to cope with the mobility of occupation. Some argue that design education not merely develops students

skill-based craftsmanship, but also nurtures creativity, analytical thinking, problem solving and communication skills through academic development. In the recent years, western developed

countries such as Australia, England, and United States of America have a strong tendency of applying the concept of competence-based education to vocational economic and technological changes in the 1980s to 1990s.

(1>)04/,+ to cope with the rapid

In the past decade, design education

has gradually become a discipline of permanent learning to better cope with the constant changes enhanced by technological innovation and social transformation (Imbesi, 2008). The situation is no

exceptions in the Asia countries, the technologies enhanced global changes in the design industry have accelerated the needs of not merely high competence and skilled designers but also strategic planners with cross-cultural awareness, communication and management literacy. In a similar

path, design education in Hong Kong has gone through more or less the same passage as other foreign countries, started from industrial, technical training and modified into higher, vocational and professional education in the 1990s; stressed on production skill and aesthetic as well as additional knowledge in criticism for the reflections of works using problem solving and critical thinking skills (Indiana Academic Standards 2000 for Visual Arts, 2000). In views of the above, it is understood

that the designers professionalism and competencies are challenged by the social, political, economic, technological and cultural context under the globalized and glocalized markets. It is also

learnt that with the increasing emphasis on key skills, work competency and the launching of qualification framework, the key competencies of knowledge, skills and attitudes together with the fundamental dispositions that designer once possessed are experiencing different degree of reformations. With the advancement in technologies and changes in economic social infrastructure,

design curricular is under major paradigm shift from technical production training to the development of transferable skills such as problem solving, communication, critical thinking, creativity and analytic visual education (Leung, 2002). Referring to Pinks (2006) idea of utilizing

cross-disciplinary mind set to generate creative ideas and business strategies (Pink, 2006), the well balancing of generic skills, design specialties, advance technologies, cross-cultural awareness and business strategies may contribute to a promising curricula to nurture the new breed of designers.

! ! !
! ! B!

CURRICULAR FOR A BRAVE NEW WORLD

Curricula of one of Hong Kongs single largest design programme provider was reviewed and see how the institutes curricular aligns with the new needs of the design industry in order to nurture a new breed of designers. A look into the curricular shows its aims to produce high competent designers

by developing their design knowledge and skills, as well as creativity professions.

0+1 interests in design

The design of the curricular was based on two major components and they are the Figure 2 is a visualization of the

generic skills modules and the design subjects modules. curriculars philosophy and components.

F(;/.+(:D;!),3?(4(+)/(;! 5:((+!(-(3(+4;!

5(+(:/)! ! ;E/--;! !

F(;/.+! ! ;>6G()4;!

Figure 2. Visualization of the curriculars philosophy and components

At a first glance, the dividing of generic skills subjects and design subjects into two major components is a rather conservative model of curricula design; further look into the

3,1>-(;D
The emphasis

details reveal that the modules in the curricular have been devised in discreet combinations to cater the need of new designers competencies in the globalized and glocalised markets.

on generic skills such as languages (English, Chinese and the spoken Putonghua) equips students with a competitive standard on communication with cross-cultural clients. The information and

technology modules keep abreast with the technological advancements to raise awareness of social implications and contemporary issues on the use of information technology, for examples, usability, user behaviors, cross-boundary communications and ethnics. The elements of life-long learning

provide a number of knowledge and soft skills such as sociology, self and time management and

! !

C!

creative thinking etc. to enhance students work attitudes, problem solving skills as well as self-confidence. The industrial attachment further highlights understanding of the workplace

professionalism and enables the application of learnt knowledge in a real life context. Cross-cultural elements are contextualized in the design subjects and the generic skills modules to facilitate the understanding of the design industries, the business practices, the specific cultures, living and working environments in the global and glocal markets. In addition to the above, it is

delighted to see the embedding of the green environmental and sustainable development elements in the generic subjects. The global awareness of sustainable design, green consumerism and It was noticed that

engineering for sustainability are also the essential elements in the curricular.

the institutes curricula has well aware of the new design competencies needed and hoping to nurture a new breed of designers possess with strong practical design knowledge, skills and innovative ideas as well as cross-cultural awareness, communication and management competencies to cope with the rapid changing design industry and the diversified clients in the globalized and glocalized markets.

In response to the above and referring to the T shape concept as stated by Norman (Norman, 2011), the nurturing of design specialist with in depth specific skills and knowledge generalist with a broad interdisciplinary knowledge seems to be the focus of contemporary design curricula. However, it is questionable that the T shape concept of nurturing a new breed of designers merely rests in the curricula and in school context. Very often, students are stop being nurtured and

assessed after they graduate and it is always of interest to see how students perform at work after their pre-vocational school years. Follow on Imbesis (2008) view that design education is

permanent learning to cope with the constant technological and social changes, an suggestion of an I shape concept of putting an additional horizontal line in the bottom to the original T shape as the continuum of continuous professional development (CPD) may able to tackle the issue. CPD is

not new in a number of professions such as engineering, medical, architectural, accountancy etc. Given that, further collaborations between pre and post vocational training providers, design professional and industry bodies are in need to the promotion of CPD to in-service designers for the updating of professional knowledge, cross-cultural awareness, communication and management competencies as well as the chartered and licensing matters to enhance the designers status and competitiveness in the globalized and glocalized markets. It is also interesting to indicate that the

alphabet I resemblances to the Chinese character of with the meanings of job and work, symbolically, it is the additional line in the bottom that enables the sustainability and currency of the designers profession.

FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS!

!
The findings of this paper shed insights to designers to articulate new design competencies and

! !

"H!

professionalism in order to enhance their design practices in the global and glocal markets.

It is

suggested designers should utilize the use of cross-boundary technology as enabler to reach for the vast global population. It is realized that cross-boundary technology certainly raised cross-cultural

awareness while a good understanding of the social and cultural context is essential in designing for the global population. Additional attentions to consumer behaviors, life styles and experiences in a

cross-cultural context not merely enhance communications and collaborations with clients across cultures but also generate better and more preferable designs. The application of cross-disciplinary

knowledge such as sociology, cross-cultural management practices and marketing strategies are the major components to address the globlaized and glocalized shifts in the consumer society for a successful campaign. Apparently, a good grip of technological advancement,

globalization/glocalization awareness and cross-cultural practices seems to be the designers new competencies to work in the globalized cross-cultural markets. In view of the above, design

curricula in one hand should stress on the deepening of specific design skills while at the other, to broaden other competencies such as cross-cultural awareness, communication and management literacy and thus to generate the new breed of designers.

CONCLUSION!
!
This paper aims to explore the current challenges that design profession and education are confronting under the globalized economy and business. This paper has reviewed, discussed and

proposed the use of new technologies, cross-cultural design strategies and management practices with a desire to generate new design competencies. Casting design profession into the discourses

of globalization and cross-cultural management, this paper argued the possibility of applying cross-cultural design strategies and business practices to better cater for the clients needs in the international and local markets. Curricular of a design institute was reviewed to see how it copes Further

with the global and glocal design markets in order to nurture a new breed of designers.

empirical studies on the effectiveness of the curricula are awaited to be conducted to explore the feasibilities of the proposed new design competencies to further advance the knowledge of design education and practices.

REFERENCES
Anderson, Tom. (1995). Toward a Cross-Cultural Approach to Art Criticism. Studies in Art Education. Vol. 36, No.4 (Summe r, 1995), pp. 198-209.

Ballengee-Morris, Christine and Stuhr, Patricia L. (2001). Multicultural Art and Visual Cultural Education in a Changing World. Art Education. Vol. 54, No.4, Growing in Appreciation (July, 2001), pp.6-13.

! !

""!

Behrens, Roy R. (1998). Art, Design and Gestalt Theory. Leonardo. Vol. 31, No.4 (1998), pp.299-303.

Cheung, Benson Pun Sin. (2011). Developing Hong Kong Professional Competence Framework for Graphic Design Practice in Future Doctorate Education Research. Paper Presented at Doctoral Education in Design Conference, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2011.

Doloughan, Fiona J. (2002). The Language of Reflective Practice in Art and Design. Design Studies. Vol. 18, N0.2 (Spring, 2002), pp. 57-64.

Elliot, J. (1991). Action Research for educational Changes. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.!

Education Business Weekly. (2008). Research Market and Ltd; Detailed China Education and Training Industry Report for 2008. Education Business Weekly. Atlanta, Sept 17, 2008. pp.3.!

Frascara, J. (2006). Communication Design: Principles, Methods and Practices. New York: Allworth Press.

Frayling, Christophe r. (1993). Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers 1 (London:RCA, 1993).

Friedman, Ken. (2003). Theory Construction in Design Research: Criteria, Approaches and Methods. Design Studies. 24, 2003, pp.507-522.

Gaynor, Denis. (1996). Democracy in the Age of Information: A Reconception of the Public Space. Unpublished.

Giulianotti, Richard and Robertson, Roland. (2007). Forms of Glocalization: Globalization and the Migration Strategies of Scottish Football Fans in North America. Sociology. 2007. Vol. 41, pp.13.

Guttal, Shalmali. (2007). Globalisation. Development in Practice. Vol. 17, No. 4/5 (Aug., 2007), pp.523-532.

Habermas, Jrgen. (1962 trans 1989).The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Polity, Cambridge.

Hampden-Turne r, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Response to Geert Hofstede. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 21(1): pp.149-159.

! !

"#!

Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Imbesi, Lorenzo. (2008). Design for Self Production: the Digital Democratization of the Creative Profession. In Design and Researche/Design and Research. Conference Proceedings of Conference Saint Etienne, 2008, 6 edition del la Biennale Internationale Design Saint-Etienne. Ecole Superieure dArt et Design de Saint-Etienne ESADSE, 2008.

Imbesi, Lorenzo. (2011). Design for Post-Industrial Societies. Paper Presented at Doctoral Education in Design Conference, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2011.

Indiana Department of Education. (2000). Indiana Academic Standards 2000 for Visual Arts, Grade K-12. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Education. Retrieved from ERIC Resources Information Center: http://www.eric.edu.gov

Internet World Stats. (2011). Usage and Population Statistics. Retrieved 20 Sept, 2011, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

JobBank.(2011). Occupational Outlook Handbook. Retrieved 15 March, 2011, from JobBank USA: http://www.jobbankusa.com/ohb/ohb064.html

Kress, Gunthe r. (2000). Design and Transformation. Multiliteracies. (London: Routledge, 2000).

Leung. T.P. ( 2002 ). Tertiary Design Education in Hong Kong, Xpress. A journal of Hong Kong Designers association, Vol. 4.

Margolin, Victor. (1988). The Multiple Tasks of Design Research. No Guru No Method. Helsinki, Finland: University of Art and Design, 1998.

Marinetto, Mike. (2005). Book Review: The Globalization Problematicque: A Review Essay. Sociology. 2005. Vol. 39, pp.371.

Norman, Don. (2011). Design and the University: An Uneasy Fit. Paper Presented at Doctoral Education in Design Conference, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2011.

Ricky, Yuk-Kwan Ng. (2011). Cross-Cultural Design: Globalization or Glocalization? Keynote Paper for Cross-Cultural Design Mini-Conference: Designers Professionalism in Global and Local Market, Savannah College

! !

"$!

of Art and Design (SCAD), Hong Kong, 14 April to 12 May, 2011.

Ohmae, Kenichi. (1996). Transnational Activity, International Society and World Politics. Millennium. 21(3): 37-88.

Pink, H. Daniel. (2006). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. Riverhead Trade; Rep Upd edition.

Richards, D. (2001). Managing the Conflict of Cultures: Globalisation and the Persistence of Cultural Differences. Global Business Regulation: Some Research Perspectives:164-188. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Prentice-Hall, Pearson Education Australia.

Roth, Susan. (1999). The State of Design Research. Design Issues. Vol. 15, No.2, Design Research (Summe r, 1999), pp.18-26.

SCAD. (2011). Cross-Cultural Design Process: An International Perspective. Cross-Cultural Design Mini-Conference: Designers Professionalism in Global and Local Market, Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD), Hong Kong, 14 April to 12 May, 2011.

SCAD. (2011). Graphic Design on a Cross-Cultural Environment: The Hong Kong Experience. Cross-Cultural Design Mini-Conference: Designers Professionalism in Global and Local Market, Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD), Hong Kong, 14 April to 12 May, 2011.

SCAD. (2011). The World Wide Web: Design on a Global Context. Cross-Cultural Design Mini-Conference: Designers Professionalism in Global and Local Market, Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD), Hong Kong, 14 April to 12 May, 2011.

Simon, Herbert. (1969). The Science of Artificial. Cambridge. MA:MIT Press.!

Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1991). Action Research in Higher Education: Examples and Reflections. Centre for Advancement of Learning and Teaching. Brisbane: Griffith University.!

! !

! !

"%!