Toronto Torah
Toronto Torah
Toronto Torah
Vol.3 Num. 27
Certainly, we are more familiar with the Forever forward in Jewish history, as we fourteenth of Nisan as "Erev Pesach," We might amplify the midrashic note in Nirtzah, the fourteenth of Nisan but historically our sages did refer to connection by noting that Yitzchak's would be a moment of transition, the this day as "Pesach", a Yom Tov in its blessing was drawn to the fourteenth of hours of entre into "chatzi halaylah" own right. As noted by Professor Yitzchak Gilat (http://www.vbmNisan by intent, not coincidence. The beginning a new day. torah.org/vtc/0041789.html ), the midrash itself states that Yitzchak chose this date for its special portent; This completion-and-beginning character Mishnah (Pesachim 1:7) identified the building on that text, we might suggest of the fourteenth of Nisan is seen in the fourteenth of Nisan by the name that the fourteenth of Nisan, when the Talmud Yerushalmi, too, in two different "Pesach". Philo, living two thousand stores of dew are opened, is a day of explanations for the prohibition against years ago, called it "Pesach", as did fateful transition, completion of ancient labour on the fourteenth of Nisan. The Josephus in his Wars of the Jews. sages offered two different explanations journeys and incipience of new ones. This dual message is ours to claim on for this prohibition: the fourteenth of Nisan, every year. The Jew does not equate "history" with "past"; we see historic milestones in R Meir Lipschitz every birth, bat mitzvah, wedding and death, and we view our personal and Sources are provided to help the reader research answers communal drives toward spiritual Why is it significant that Hashem commanded Moshe to gather the whole achievement through lenses of portent nation to the ohel moed (tent of meeting)? (Rashi, Ramban, and Ibn Ezra to and meaning. The fourteenth of Nisan, Vayikra 8:2-4) then, is an ideal time to take stock of where we have been, to see the journey Did the kohanim really not leave the entrance of the ohel moed for a full seven of the past year as complete, and to days? (Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Chizkuni, and Netziv to Vayikra 8:32-35) celebrate a Pesach. At the same time, it Why is the term Tzav used at the beginning of the parshah, instead of the is the establishment of new goals, the more common terms Daber or Emor ? (Rashi, Ramban, Baal Haturim, start of a new journey, an Erev Pesach. Alshich, Chizkuni, Kli Yakar, Malbim, Netziv, Gur Aryeh, Shaarei Aharon, Ohr May this year's fourteenth serve as both HaChaim, and Oznaim LTorah to Vayikra 6:2, and Torat Kohanim 1:1) for all of us, ushering in greater redemption for us all. For children: Who brings a korban todah, and why? (Rashi Vayikra 7:12)
Parshah Questions
, , . " :: " , ". " , , : . , , . . ( ., " ) , . " ( . " , " ) , , , . " , , . , , . , , . , , " . , ( ,) " " - . , , , ".
Visit us at www.torontotorah.com
R Dovid Zirkind
HaAretz
Rabbi Betzalel Stern was born in 1911 to a rabbinical family living in Debrecen, Hungary. From his youth he was known as a preeminent Torah scholar, and he served in a number of communities, including Odessa, before the outbreak of the Second World War. Rabbi Stern was one of five boys, but only he and his younger brother Moshe (later the Debreciner Rov of Brooklyn, NY) survived the holocaust. In 1949 Rabbi Stern moved to Italy, where he opened a yeshiva in Rome and helped the survivors of the war rebuild their lives. In 1954 he was appointed Rabbi in Melbourne, Australia, where he established a yeshiva and a school for girls; the latter was led by his daughter. From 1968-1982 Rabbi Stern served as the rabbi of Vienna, ultimately retiring in Israel towards the end of his life. Rabbi Stern died in Jerusalem in 1989 (5749). [email protected]
Beit Pagi
Yair Manas
A mishnah (Zevachim 5:8) teaches that the Korban Pesach is in the class of kodashim kalim (offerings of lesser sanctity), and may be eaten throughout Jerusalem. What is the outer limit of Jerusalem? The Talmud (Pesachim 63b) declares that anything beyond the wall of Beit Pagi is considered to be outside of Jerusalem. Rashi (Bava Metzia 90a) explains that Beit Pagi was n ot ori gi nal ly pa r t of Jerusalem, but was subsequently added to the city. Thus, according to Rashi, Beit Pagi is considered to be part of Jerusalem. Rabbeinu Chananel (Sanhedrin 14b), in a different context, contends that Beit Pagi is actually located outside of Jerusalem. According to a suggestion by researcher Asher Grosberg (Te chumin 19:469; http:// www.daat.ac.il/daat/v-articles/ techumin19a.pdf), there were actually two places called Beit Pagi. One was located within Jerusalem, probably close to Har Habayit, and this was the Beit Pagi Rashi mentioned. Another was located outside Jerusalem, as explained by Rabbeinu Chananel. Grosberg p r ove s that Jerusalem wa s expanded during the Bayit Rishon period, as Rashi had explained. A gemara (Pesachim 91a) mentions that those who are in jail and within the bounds of Beit Pagi can participate in the korban Pesach. The Jewish Encyclopedia entry for Beit Pagi posits that Herod built a jail on the northwest corner of Har Habayit, so the Beit Pagi mentioned in this gemara must be the one that was located close to Har Habayit. In his Descriptive Geography and Brief Historical Sketch of Palestine, Rabbi Joseph Schwartz describes Beit Pagi to be located somewhere near the Mount of Olives (written in 1 850 , avai lable a t: h ttp :// www.jewish-history.com/palestine/ moriah.html). In his Economy of Roman Palestine, Zeev Safrai identifies Bait Pagi as being located 500 meters from Jerusalem (pg. 19, available on Google books). Thus this locale must be the Beit Pagi that is outside of Jerusalem, to which Rabbeinu Chananel referred. [email protected]
Regarding those who own the land they are living on, in my humble opinion it seems that they must relinquish ownership from the land on which the trash cans stand. Granted they have lent the property to the city for the purpose of placing city trash cans there, nonetheless, surely no formal acquisition has been made on that allowance. It is taught in the Machazit Hashekel (448:4) that lending [space] only creates valid ownership upon the transfer of money. Implicit in this is the need for a formal acquisition Even though one has released ownership of the area, he is permitted to move the garbage he accumulates in his home to the can in that ownerless place all through Pesach. First, he isnt using the actual land. Furthermore, it is permissible to use that which is hefker for everyone. However, I have seen the letter of my brother, the Gaon (Beer Moshe 1:41 and 3:72), criticizing a certain Rabbi who suggested selling trash cans with chametz to a non-Jew precisely because the seller and his family continue to use the cans throughout the holiday, after the sale. Further, the seller and purchaser know that the sanitation workers dispose of the trash from the cans and so the purchaser will have no benefit from the purchase. If so, such a sale is nothing more than a mockery. However, our case, regarding hefker, is different
Visit us at www.torontotorah.com
We look forward to seeing you at our Kayitz Zman programs after Pesach!
Visit us at www.torontotorah.com