Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    NSG Process Tool

    Uploaded by

    mesdejen
    This document appears to be an evaluation tool for assessing nursing students on their application of the nursing process. It provides a rating scale for evaluating students on four main criteria: assessment, problem list, nursing care plan, and references. Within each criterion are specific competencies that will be rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being competent and 1 being needs improvement. The total scores from each criterion will be combined for an overall grade, calculated as the raw score divided by the perfect score, multiplied by 50 plus 50. The perfect total score is listed as 128. The evaluation tool is to be used to rate nursing students and provide feedback to help them develop their clinical reasoning and nursing process skills.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    NSG Process Tool

    Uploaded by

    mesdejen
    35 views3 pages
    This document appears to be an evaluation tool for assessing nursing students on their application of the nursing process. It provides a rating scale for evaluating students on four main criteria: assessment, problem list, nursing care plan, and references. Within each criterion are specific competencies that will be rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being competent and 1 being needs improvement. The total scores from each criterion will be combined for an overall grade, calculated as the raw score divided by the perfect score, multiplied by 50 plus 50. The perfect total score is listed as 128. The evaluation tool is to be used to rate nursing students and provide feedback to help them develop their clinical reasoning and nursing process skills.

    Original Title

    Nsg Process Tool

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document appears to be an evaluation tool for assessing nursing students on their application of the nursing process. It provides a rating scale for evaluating students on four main criteria: assessment, problem list, nursing care plan, and references. Within each criterion are specific competencies that will be rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being competent and 1 being needs improvement. The total scores from each criterion will be combined for an overall grade, calculated as the raw score divided by the perfect score, multiplied by 50 plus 50. The perfect total score is listed as 128. The evaluation tool is to be used to rate nursing students and provide feedback to help them develop their clinical reasoning and nursing process skills.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    35 views3 pages

    NSG Process Tool

    Uploaded by

    mesdejen
    This document appears to be an evaluation tool for assessing nursing students on their application of the nursing process. It provides a rating scale for evaluating students on four main criteria: assessment, problem list, nursing care plan, and references. Within each criterion are specific competencies that will be rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being competent and 1 being needs improvement. The total scores from each criterion will be combined for an overall grade, calculated as the raw score divided by the perfect score, multiplied by 50 plus 50. The perfect total score is listed as 128. The evaluation tool is to be used to rate nursing students and provide feedback to help them develop their clinical reasoning and nursing process skills.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Arellano University 3058 Jose Abad Santos Campus, Pasay City College of Nursing

    EVALUATION TOOL NURSING PROCESS

    Name:_______________________________________________ Evaluator _____________________________________________ DIRECTION: Rate the learner based on the competencies listed below. Key: 4 - COMPETENT 3 - ACCEPTABLE 2 - NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
    1 - UNACCEPTABLE

    Rating_________ Date __________

    ( Task was done thoroughly and precisely) (Task was done well enough ) ( Task was done with some difficulty)
    (

    Criterion
    4 3 2 1

    I. ASSESSMENT
    A. History/POF/ P A data are: 1. Complete/comprehensive 2. Accurate 4. Analyses are relevant & comorehensive

    B. Laboratory and Diagnostic Examinations:


    1. Complete/comprehensive 2. Analysis is relevant to disease process

    C. Drug Analysis:
    1. Complete lists 2. Comprehensively analyzed D. Ecologic Model: 1. Correct model 2. Correct and complete identification of predisposing factors 3. Comprehensive analysis 4. Adequate thera[peautic recommendations

    Criterion
    II. Problem List 1. Analysis/ norms are appropriate to data collected 2. problems identified are correct & supported by relevant cues 3. priority problem is correctly identified based on jurisdiction. III. Nursing Care Plan

    A. Diagnosis 1. Stated correctly 2. centered on the client 3. Supported by complete relevant cues according to IOM B. Analysis 1. Scientific analysis contains general cause of the problem 2. implications are arranged from minor to major a. Immediate cause b. Intermediate cause c. Primary cause C. Goal 1. Relates to the problem 2. Time bounded D. Objective 1. Relates to the cause of the problem 2. Specific 3. Measurable 4. Attainable/realistic 5. Timebounded E. Interventions 1. Relevant/ appropriate 2. Prioritized 3. Invove members of the family 4. Categorized as to Development, Supplemental, Supplemental, Facilitative F. Rationale 1. Scientific and Documented 2. Precisely explains the why/ how of the interventions G. Evaluation 1. Evaluates if objective was met based on criteria stated ( effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness, adequacy, acceptability IV. Reference 1. All analysis are well documented 2. Correct format 3. Books used are recent & relevant to the subject matter

    TOTAL
    Rate the students from 1 - 4 where 4 = very satisfactory: exhibits competency independently 3 = satisfactory: exhibits competency with minimal supervision 2 = fair : exhibis competency fairly with close supervision. 1 = needs improvement : needs to develop competency 0 = no competency : not performed

    Grading System: Raw Score/Perfect Score x 50+50

    Perfect Score = 128


    4x 3x 2x 1x = = = = ______________
    ______________________

    Student's Signature

    ________________________________ Instructor's signature and date

    You might also like