TitleIV Funding Court Findings
TitleIV Funding Court Findings
TitleIV Funding Court Findings
7-1-2008
TITLE IV-E
ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS Title IV-E eligibility begins with a determination of the child and family's
ability to qualify for the former Aid to Families with Dependent Children
(AFDC) grant under the state plan which was in effect on July 16, 1996.
The child and family's eligibility for the Family Independence Program
(FIP) cash assistance grant does not equate to automatic eligibility for
title IV-E funds.
Local office staff must determine title IV-E eligibility using SWSS FAJ.
Title IV-E eligibility ends when a child is placed back in his/her own
home or with a legal guardian. A new eligibility determination must be
completed for each new placement episode. See CFF 902, FINANCIAL
DETERMINATIONS for information on Placement Episodes.)
Title IV-E Status There are two distinct types of title IV-E status - title IV-E eligible and
Types title IV-E reimbursable. Both must occur concurrently before title IV-E
payments can be issued. Definitions of the two types of title IV-E status
are:
• Title IV-E eligible - When the child entered placement, the child
met the AFDC standards in effect on July 16, 1996 and DHS has
placement and care responsibility.
US CITIZENSHIP/
QUALIFIED ALIEN
STATUS Receipt of title IV-E funds is limited to U.S. citizens and “qualified
aliens.” If the worker determines that a child is not a U.S citizen or a
qualified alien, the child is not title IV-E eligible and the procedures
outlined in CFF 902-5, Title IV-E Funding Denial or Cancellation must
be followed.
• An alien who is paroled into the U.S. under section 212(d)(5) of the
INA for a period of at least one year.
Not Qualified Alien Examples of persons who are NOT QUALIFIED ALIENS include, but
are not limited to, undocumented aliens and aliens legally admitted on a
temporary basis for work, study or pleasure.
U.S. Citizens The following persons are considered U.S. citizens or have an accept-
able status for benefits:
VERIFICATION/
DOCUMENTATION
PROCEDURES Workers must verify citizenship status or qualified alien status for all
children in foster care. Eligibility for title IV-E funding requires U.S. citi-
zenship or qualified alien status of the child. The receipt of benefits is
based upon the child’s status and not on the parent’s status. Verification
must be done in a non-discriminatory way.
a citizen, the worker should request that the parent provide documenta-
tion regarding alien status. If the parent refuses to provide documenta-
tion, the child is NOT title IV-E eligible.
• U.S. passport.
Note: Such persons are NOT required to register with the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
See PEM 225, Exhibit III, U.S. State Department Documents, U.S.Citi-
zenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) documents for more infor-
mation on the above mentioned documents. Also see Reference Forms
& Publications (RFF) manual for exhibits and document descriptions of
the I-94 and I-551.
FORMER AFDC
PROGRAM
ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS The child must meet all eligibility requirements for the former AFDC pro-
gram, except that of living with an acceptable relative, in the month in
which the court action that led to the child’s removal occurred. A court
action is defined as an order that removes the child from his/her home.
The following children are not former AFDC eligible as there are no
facts upon which to base former AFDC program eligibility:
Living With The child lived with a specified relative at the time of, or within six
Specified Relative months prior to, the initiation of court action. A specified relative is one
of the following:
• Parent.
• Aunt or uncle.
• Niece or nephew.
• Stepparent.
• Sister or brother.
• Stepsister or stepbrother.
• First cousin.
Removal Home for When determining title IV-E eligibility, the first step in the process is to
Title IV-E Eligibility identify the child’s removal home. Correctly identifying the “removal
home” is critical.
• Although the child may have been out of the parent/specified rela-
tive home at the time court action was initiated, the child must
have lived in the removal home (i.e. the home with the “contrary to
the welfare judicial finding”) during the six months preceding the
court action to remove the child.
• For children under six months of age, “lived with” is also inter-
preted as “born to” in reference to the removal home requirement
even if the child has not lived with the mother since birth.
Note: The removal home, and the home the court finds it is “contrary to
the welfare” of the child to remain in, must be the same home. In almost
all cases that would be the parent’s home, even though the child is
physically removed from a different home.
• The child remains in the home of the caretaker who serves as the
out-of-home care provider to the child after the department is
awarded custody.
• The child lived with a parent or stepparent within the past six
months prior to court jurisdiction.
Reasons for • Continued absence of a parent from the removal home (examples
Deprivation Are are separation, divorce or death).
If the child had been removed from the home of a relative rather
than from the parent(s)’ home, the relative’s home is reviewed at
the time of redetermination to establish continuing deprivation of
parental support and care. If either or both parents are not in that
home at redetermination, then the child is deprived based on con-
tinued absence of the parent(s) from that home.
or
or
• Worked at least six quarters of the last three and one quarter
years preceding the filing of the petition. Document one and a
half years of work history within the past three and one quar-
ter years in SWSS FAJ.
When Parents Continued title IV-E eligibility for a child who was removed from a single
Reunite parent home becomes complicated if the parents reunite. At that point
an evaluation of the eligibility of the intact family unit (i.e., both parents
and all children removed by court order) for the former AFDC program
must be conducted.
If the intact family would have been eligible for the former AFDC pro-
gram, continued title IV-E eligibility must be based on an evaluation of
the sufficiency of the child's income and resources to meet the full cost
of care.
If the child's income (including child support, RSDI and other unearned
income) does not equal the cost of care, title IV-E eligibility continues.
Termination of For a child who was initially determined to be title IV-E eligible, once
Parental Rights TPR of both parents has occurred, from that point forward, and through-
(TPR) out the child’s placement episode, the deprivation factor requirement is
met.
• For a child removed from the parent(s), the income of the par-
ent(s), stepparent(s) and sibling(s) under age 18, must be consid-
ered only in the initial eligibility determination. Income of the non-
parent adult or living together partner must not be considered.
•• The child has been with the relative less than six months.
•• “Contrary to the welfare” is found against the parent(s).
•• The AFDC eligibility is based on the parent(s) income and
assets.
The income of the parent(s), stepparent(s) and siblings under age 18,
must be considered only in the initial eligibility determination. Income of
the non-parent adult or living together partner must not be considered.
Deductions The SWSS funding determination process automatically applies the fol-
lowing income deductions:
• Child care expenses. Enter the amount paid for the actual child
care expenses, not the DHS allowable amount.
• Child support paid for a child who is not living within the removal
home. Enter the amount paid by the parent, not the ordered
amount.
YOUTH’S INCOME The income available to the youth must be considered initially and at
each redetermination in determining eligibility for title IV-E. If a youth's
available net income is less than the board rate being paid for care, the
youth continues to be eligible on the basis of need.
If a youth's available net income exceeds the board rate, eligibility may
still exist since the needs of a youth include items other than basic
maintenance. These cases are to be referred through supervisory
channels to Reconciliation and Recoupment Section in central office for
analysis of eligibility. See CFF Item 902-12, Government Benefits and
Other Benefits, for procedures.
Evaluating Income • EARNED INCOME - Earned income of the child(ren) must be dis-
regarded when they are full-time students or part-time students
who are part-time employees. All earned income not disregarded
must be used to reduce the daily rate for foster care. (Refer to CFF
903-8 to determine net income and procedure to adjust rate.)
Any interim collections made by the local office are to be sent to the
central office, Cashier Unit. Payment to the foster parent will be for the
full amount of the board rate.
Note: A youth cannot be funded from both title IV-E and Supplemental
Security Income (SSI). A decision must be made as to which funding
source is most appropriate and then the incorrect funding source is
closed. See CFF 902-10 for additional details.
If a youth would not have been included in the former AFDC program
grant solely because of the receipt of SSI, a DHS-3205 must be com-
pleted and submitted to the Reconciliation & Recoupment Section
requesting an evaluation of the advantage to continuing the SSI or
changing to title IV-E funding.
Assets The property of the parent(s), stepparent(s) and siblings under age 18
must be considered in the initial eligibility determination. For redetermi-
nations, the property of the parents does not affect the child's continued
eligibility while in foster care. The property of the child must be consid-
ered initially and at each redetermination. Each child at redetermination
is considered a family of one. SWSS FAJ exempts $10,000.00 in prop-
erty.
Employment For youth sixteen and over who are not regularly attending an elemen-
tary, secondary or vocational (technical) school on a full or part-time
basis, their earnings must be budgeted and they must be referred to the
State of Michigan’s current employment program. The youth may regis-
ter at www.michiganworks.org.
Continued former The child must continue to meet all eligibility requirements of the former
AFDC Eligibility AFDC program other than living with an acceptable relative. These
requirements include:
LEGAL
JURISDICTION A court order must exist which makes the Department of Human Ser-
vices responsible for the child's placement and care.
• A court order giving the DHS responsibility for placement and care
acts as the application for title IV-E. For youth released under 1974
PA 296, the order terminating rights meets this requirement as
long as the DHS is given responsibility for placement and care.
• Jurisdiction of the eligible child must have been taken under either
the neglect or delinquency section of the Juvenile Code (but not
under any criminal code or proceedings).
• Orders for state wards must include the words: “committed to the
Michigan Department of Human Services.” The public act under
which the youth is committed (i.e., the Youth Rehabilitation Ser-
vices Act, 1974 PA 150 or the Michigan Children’s Institute (MCI)
Act, 1935 PA 220) must be identified on the commitment order.
Orders for temporary or permanent court wards must contain the
words: “placed with the Michigan Department of Human Services
for placement and care.” See MCL 400.55(H).
care. Title IV-E funding must not be authorized prior to the accep-
tance date, which is the day the court order is signed by the judge/
referee.
A “best practice” continues to be that the court orders indicate that any
child be placed with DHS for care and supervision. The fact that a court
order approves of, acknowledges, or agrees to, the DHS placement
decision on the court order does not negate title IV-E eligibility for that
youth.
REQUIRED
JUDICIAL
FINDINGS In order for a child to be title IV-E eligible the court order must contain
documentation of the evidence used by the court to make judicial
findings. Court orders may contain checkboxes for the finding, but the
determinations must be explicit and made on a case by case basis. The
order cannot be amended by a subsequent order, e.g., a nunc pro tunc
order, which amends the original order to meet eligibility.
• The court order may not reference state law for these determina-
tions.
The child is ineligible for the current placement episode if the finding
is not made in the first order for each placement episode. The determi-
nation must be explicit and made on a case by case basis.
For abuse/neglect wards, the court order may reference the petition to
document this finding. This is not acceptable for juvenile justice wards
because the petition details the youth’s criminal behavior. Other juvenile
justice criteria include:
• The finding must be based upon the parents’ actions, not the
youth’s behavior. Evidence that only references the youth’s behav-
ior does not meet this requirement.
• When the court finds “contrary to the welfare” and the child is not
removed from the removal home on the date of the finding, the
child is not title IV-E eligible.
Note: If a “contrary to the welfare” finding is made and the child is not
removed, the child is not eligible during this placement episode.
Verbal Approval/ For after hours (nights, weekends, and/or holidays) and emergency
Consent for the removals, a judge or referee, may give verbal approval/consent for the
Removal removal and placement of a child in out-of-home care. Verbal approval/
consent will not jeopardize the child’s potential title IV-E eligibility if all
the following conditions are met:
• The written order contains the findings of fact, on which the verbal
consent was based, and includes the “contrary to the welfare find-
ing.”
Title IV-E foster care payments may begin from the first day of place-
ment in the month in which all eligibility criteria are met.
In order to be eligible for title IV-E funding, the court must make two
separate reasonable efforts determinations.These determinations must
be:
• Made at a court hearing where the parents and child(ren) have the
opportunity to attend the hearing.
To Prevent The first determination, “the agency has made reasonable efforts to
Removal prevent removal from the home,” must be made at a court hearing held
within 60 days of the child’s removal from his/her home. Title IV-E eligi-
bility cannot begin until the reasonable efforts judicial determination has
been obtained.
Title IV-E foster care payments may begin from the first day of place-
ment provided the “reasonable efforts to prevent removal” finding has
been made at a court hearing that calendar month.
If the finding is not made in the calendar month of removal, title IV-E eli-
gibility begins the first day of the month in which all eligibility criteria are
met, provided that is within the 60 day time frame.
The child’s case is ineligible for title IV-E funding for the current
foster care episode if:
• The judicial finding is not made within the 60 day time frame;
• The court refuses to make this finding; or
• The court finds that reasonable efforts to prevent removal were not
made.
Note: The date the order is signed or received in the office is not rele-
vant in terms of meeting the 60 day time frame. A subsequent order
(e.g., a nunc pro tunc order) amending the original order cannot be
used to establish compliance with this requirement.
Finalize the The second determination, “the agency has made reasonable efforts to
Permanency Plan finalize the permanency plan,” is required within 12 months from the
date of removal.
The child becomes ineligible for title IV-E funding at the end of the
month in which the judicial determination was required to be made, and
remains ineligible until the first of the month a determination is made.
The child is ineligible for title IV-E funding until an order from a new
hearing is issued which contains this finding.
The 12 month time frame for the next required finding of reasonable
efforts to finalize the permanency plan begins with the date the last find-
ing was made.
REASONABLE
EFFORTS NOT
REQUIRED Reasonable efforts are not required to prevent the child’s removal from
home due to any of the following:
Additionally, reasonable efforts are not required if the court has deter-
mined that the parent, or guardian of the child has abused the child or a
sibling of the child, and per Michigan law the abuse must include 1 or
more of the following aggravated circumstances (MCL 722.638(1)(a)):
• Or, the parent of the child failed to protect the child from one of the
above.
Note: A judicial finding that reasonable efforts are not required cannot
be made for juvenile justice wards.
ELIGIBLE LIVING
ARRANGEMENT The child must currently be in foster care in a licensed foster home,
licensed private child caring institution, or a DHS child care treatment
facility of 25 beds or less. (See CFF 721 for a definition of foster care.)
• Michigan can utilize title IV-E funds for placement with for profit
private child caring institutions (residential care).
• Children of minor parents who are placed in the same foster care
setting as the parent(s) are not eligible for title IV-E funding. Even
though the court may have taken jurisdiction, these children have
not been physically removed from the home of a parent. Foster
care payments for these children must be included in the parent’s
foster care payment authorization as a ward child.
Note: State wards living with relatives are eligible to receive State
Ward Board and Care payments (See CFF 902-8). Local Child
CHILDRENS FOSTER CARE MANUAL STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
CFF 902-2 19 of 20 PR - TITLE IV-E ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS CFB 2008-007
7-1-2008
Care Funds may also be used to fund these placements for tem-
porary court wards according to county policy (CFF 902-7).
•• Child abuse/neglect.
•• Spousal abuse.
• Title IV-E funds cannot be paid to a foster family home or child car-
ing institution with a provisional license because of a licensing vio-
lation. This applies even though a corrective action plan may have
been approved. Newly licensed foster family homes with the origi-
nal provisional license are not included in this definition.
•• The child entered the U.S on or after August 22, 1996, and
the child has been a qualified alien for at least five years; or
- An asylee;
- An alien whose deportation is withheld; or
- A Cuban/Haitian entrant.
trative rate cannot be paid from title IV-E funds to a private child
placing agency that is supervising a youth in an independent living
arrangement.