Laura A. Stokowski, RN, MS
Laura A. Stokowski, RN, MS
Laura A. Stokowski, RN, MS
y y y y
What's missing in nursing education? Are there better ways of teaching/learning? What does future hold for nursing degrees (including the associate's degree)? Does nursing education prepare nurses for practice?
y y y y y y y y y y
The dressing of blisters, sores, burns and wounds; the application of fomentations, poultices, cups, and leeches; The administration of enemas; The management of trusses and appliances for uterine complaints; The best method of friction to the body and extremities; The management of helpless patients: making beds, moving, changing, giving baths in bed, preventing and dressing bedsores, and changing positions; Bandaging -- and making bandages, rollers, and splints; Preparing, cooking, and serving delicacies for the sick; Practical methods of supplying fresh air, warming and ventilating sick-rooms; Keeping all utensils perfectly clean and disinfected; and Making accurate observations and reports to the physician of the state of secretions, expectoration, skin, pulse, appetite, temperature, delirium or stupor, breathing, sleep, condition of wounds, eruptions, formation of matter, effect of diet or of stimulants or medicines.
This was the proposed curriculum for a school of nursing opening in Chicago in 1882.[3] This curriculum would take a little more than 2 years to learn, during which you would work 7 days a week, 12 hours a day, with 1 afternoon off per week. You would work without pay, essentially as free staff for the hospital; your "salary" was your education. After work in the evenings, you would attend lectures given by physicians or supervising nurses on subjects such as obstetrics, surgical emergencies, anatomy, physiology, electricity, materia medica (pharmacology), bathing, and massage. Exams on these lectures would be given periodically. However, the overall program emphasized practice over theory -- with practice commanding a 90% share of your time. This, or something very like this, was how nurses were "trained" at the beginning of the era known as "modern nursing." Nursing education followed an apprenticeship model, wherein students took care of patients under the supervision of more senior nurses. Nursing education received a much-needed boost in 1917 when the National League for Nursing Education published their first standard curriculum for schools of nursing.[4] A more recognizable nursing curriculum, it was organized
around the familiar categories of medical nursing, surgical nursing, obstetrical nursing, nursing care of children, and so forth. Student nurses would still have to learn cookery, hospital housekeeping, and massage, but they would also receive classes in ethics, psychology, professional issues, and history of nursing, and could take electives in public health or administration. The underlying theme of the curriculum was that nursing was aprofession. With the appearance of college-affiliated nursing programs and the baccalaureate degree, nursing students had the benefit of an entire university or college with which to supplement their education. For the most part, however, the core nursing curriculum continued to revolve around the traditional medical specialties of medicine, surgery, obstetrics, pediatrics, and mental health
Curriculum Revolution
In 1988, the National League for Nursing (NLN) attempted to shake nursing schools loose from the hold of the traditional, content-laden, lecture-and-test approach to nursing education. In Curriculum Revolution: Mandate for Change,[5] nursing leaders called for an overhaul of nursing education that would change the way nursing was taught and learned. It did not succeed. During the ensuing 25 years, under the auspices of "reform," nurse educators essentially rearranged and updated the curriculum without changing the substance of the curriculum itself or the educational paradigm.[6] In 2003, the NLN once again advocated a transformation of nursing education, via the creation of innovative pedagogies that will be effective in helping students learn to practice in rapidly-changing environments.[6] Graduating nurses would be leaders in health promotion and disease prevention, function in complex and unpredictable environments, demonstrate critical reasoning and flexibility, and execute a variety of roles throughout their nursing careers. The old and tired clinical placement model would give way to an approach that has relevance for the increasingly community-based, multidisciplinary patient care delivery systems of the future. We now come to 2009. An initiative known as the Future of Nursing (FON), a joint project of the Institute of Medicine and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, began its critical review of the nursing profession by holding 3 national forums, one of which focused on nursing education. This forum was led by Michael Bleich, RN, PhD, Dean of the Oregon Health & Science University School of Nursing. Participants in this forum considered needed innovations in what to teach (ideal future nursing curricula), how to teach (methodologies and strategies), and where to teach (venues and locations for nursing education). The recommendations that came out of this forum were driven by 4 realities (1) more nurses are working outside of hospitals as care shifts formally and informally into communities; (2) evidence that could inform practice is growing rapidly, but is not well-integrated into either education or practice; (3) the need for nurses to effectively work in and lead teams is increasing; and (4) numbers alone will not fill the widening gap between the supply of nurses and the growing need for their services -- additional research and new knowledge will be required.
a set of experiences that must be added to the way we educate. We need to address concepts within populations of patients, and shift from the medical diagnosis model or the task and procedures model to competence in applying critical concepts to multiple patients with multiple diagnoses." The Future of Nursing Education report also identifies diversity as a missing element among current nursing student applicants. More racial-ethnic and gender diversity must be actively pursued so that a workforce is created that is better able to meet the demands of a diverse population across the life span, and nurses are better able to provide culturally-relevant care.
Competency-Based Learning
The emphasis in nursing education is sometimes perceived to be on preparing students for their nursing boards, but as Michael Bleich pointed out, "The licensure exam is a minimum standard -- it tests only for minimum safe competency. But the public wants more than that. They want optimal competency, especially in the specialized areas. We have to move beyond the notion of comparing nursing programs for their abilities to assure graduates are minimally competent, and the public is challenging us, and saying how are you going to do this?" It is a common misconception that competencies are task-based proficiencies. The student demonstrates the ability to take a blood pressure, or give a subcutaneous injection, and the instructor makes a checkmark on a skills list. Competencies are actually higher level skills that represent the ability to demonstrate mastery over care management and that provide a foundation for decision-making skills under a variety of clinical situations across all care settings. Examples of competencies are:
y y
y y y y y y y y y y y
Evidence-based practice; Relationship-centered care; Interprofessional collaboration and teamwork; Leadership; Assisting individuals and families in self-care practices for promotion of health and management of chronic illness; Teaching, delegation, and supervision of caregivers; Genetics and genomics; Cultural sensitivity; Practice across the lifespan; End-of-life care; and Professionalism.
Interprofessional Education
Interprofessional collaboration, a necessary component of effective care coordination in the increasingly complex healthcare environment, will not be broadly achieved until healthcare professional students are educated together. The poor communication and lack of respect between, for example, nurses and physicians, lead to poor outcomes; but effective teamwork and good working relationships can improve outcomes. Sharing different professional perspectives is viewed as critical to this objective.[1] This will only be achieved through interprofessional team training of nurse, physician, and other healthcare provider students, and this in turn requires committed partnerships across the professions.[1] Nursing and medical students who are educated in interprofessional collaboration, knowledge of each other's professional roles and responsibilities, effective communication, conflict resolution, and shared decision-making, and who are exposed to the other students through simulation and Webbased training, will be more likely to engage in collaboration in future work settings.[1] It is recommended that schools of nursing and other health professional schools should implement early and continuous interprofessional collaboration through joint classroom and clinical training opportunities. Interprofessional education should continue after these students begin working through joint continuing competency programs provided by healthcare organizations.
Continuing Education
Not a single initial degree can provide a nurse with all she or he will need to know over an entire career.[1]Students need to learn the fundamentals of their profession, but they also need to develop a "spirit of inquiry."[2] "We need nurses to engage in lifelong learning," explained Dr. Bleich. "This is not just what they learn on the job caring for patients, or at skills fairs, but professional development, continuing education, and stretching leadership development. It doesn't always require another professional degree, but neither is it what is casually or serendipitously picked up during the course of delivering care, either." The Future of Nursing initiative identified a framework for continuous lifelong learning that includes basic education, academic progression, and continuing competencies. Nurses need a solid education in how to manage complex conditions and coordinate with other healthcare professionals. New competencies in systems thinking, quality improvement, care management, and a basic understanding of healthcare policy must be demonstrated.
To be fair, nursing school is about more than preparing a nurse for his or her first job. It's about preparing nurses for a profession -- a lifetime career. It's possible that the right balance between the two hasn't yet been found, or that other strategies are needed to facilitate the transition to the nurse's "first job." This need was addressed by the Future of Nursing initiative.[1]
Reaction The article tackled about the history of nursing. And it shows that it there is something missing in the nursing education. And that was when curriculum was revised and holistic approach was adapted. Nursing leaders formulated ways to improve the nursing course. The result of their efforts was just okay. Because they observed that nurses especially novice nurses have hard time dealing to their work. So they formulated another option. They ended in adding time for on the job training. They put this up into consideration because they noted that theoretical foundations solely cannot fully help the students. I think, for the student nurses to excel in this career, they need to learn how to use all of their foundations in giving care to the patients they are handling in the clinical area. They need to learn how to integrate things they know and how to apply it when needed. For me, it is called integrated nursing practice. If student nurses were able to accomplish that, they can provide a quality nursing care. I think, they can also pass the licensure exam easily.