Thesis Kabir 2018

Foreign Aid in Bangladesh:
Its Contributions to Economic Growth and Development
A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Arts (International Development)
Md Raihan Kabir
Master of Arts (International Development)
College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Flinders University
28 May 2018.
CONTENTS
CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... ii
ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................... iv
DECLARATION .............................................................................................................................. v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................. vi
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ vii
LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... viii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ ix
CHAPTER 1: THE FOREIGN AID REGIME IN BANGLADESH ..................................................... 1
1.1. Motivation ......................................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Aim and Objective: ............................................................................................................ 3
1.3. Justification and Significance ............................................................................................ 4
1.4. Theoretical Framework ..................................................................................................... 5
1.5. Method ............................................................................................................................. 7
1.6. Outline of the Paper .......................................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER 2: THE AID-GROWTH DEBATE .................................................................................. 9
2.1. Literature Review .............................................................................................................. 9
2.1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 9
2.1.2. Literature on the impact of aid on economic growth and development ....................... 9
2.1.3. Literature on the impact of aid on economic growth of Bangladesh ......................... 13
2.1.4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 14
2.2. Alternatives to Aid in Bangladesh.................................................................................... 14
2.2.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 14
2.2.2. Alternative financing options in Bangladesh other than aid ...................................... 15
2.2.3. Conclusion on the alternatives to aid ....................................................................... 18
CHAPTER 3: OVERVIEW OF FOREIGN AID IN BANGLADESH ................................................ 19
3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 19
3.2. Historical Background of Aid Utilisation ........................................................................... 19
3.3. Categories of Foreign Aid in Bangladesh ........................................................................ 20
3.3.1. Food Aid .................................................................................................................. 21
3.3.2. Commodity Aid ........................................................................................................ 22
3.3.3. Project Aid ............................................................................................................... 22
3.3.4. Budget Support ........................................................................................................ 23
3.4. Aid Investment Scenario by Sector ................................................................................. 24
3.5. Disbursement of Aid and Debt Servicing Liability ............................................................ 25
3.5.1. Commitment and disbursement ............................................................................... 25
3.5.2. Debt service liability ................................................................................................. 26
3.6. Major Donors and Aid Conditionality ............................................................................... 27
ii
3.6.1. Financial conditions of aid ........................................................................................ 27
3.6.2. Conditions on aid utilisation modalities .................................................................... 28
3.7. Modifications in Aid Utilisation Modalities ........................................................................ 28
3.8. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 29
CHAPTER 4: THE IMPACT OF AID ON ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ............. 31
4.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 31
4.2. The Impact of Aid on Macroeconomic Variables ............................................................. 31
4.2.1. Aid and Public Investment ....................................................................................... 32
4.2.2. Aid and Macroeconomic Conditions ......................................................................... 33
4.2.3. Aid and Trade .......................................................................................................... 34
4.2.4. Aid and FDI.............................................................................................................. 35
4.2.5. Aid and Domestic Savings ....................................................................................... 36
4.2.6. Aid and Domestic Revenue Generation ................................................................... 36
4.3. The Impact of Aid on Human and Social Development ................................................... 37
4.4. The Impact of Aid on Institutional Capacity Building ........................................................ 38
4.5. The Impact of Aid on Environmental Management .......................................................... 40
4.6. Findings and Conclusion ................................................................................................. 41
CHAPTER 5: IMPEDIMENTS TO AID EFFECTIVENESS ............................................................ 43
5.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 43
5.2. Institutional Incompetence .............................................................................................. 43
5.3. Corruption ....................................................................................................................... 45
5.4. Political Instability ........................................................................................................... 46
5.5. Aid Conditionality ............................................................................................................ 49
5.6. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 50
CHAPTER 6: AID EFFECTIVENESS - MEASURES AND ANALYSIS ......................................... 52
6.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 52
6.2. Progress of Aid Effectiveness Measures ......................................................................... 52
6.2.1. Aid effectiveness measures and progress before the Paris Declaration ................... 53
6.2.2. Aid effectiveness measures and progress after the Paris Declaration ...................... 54
6.3. Identifying Weaknesses in the Aid Delivery System ........................................................ 59
6.4. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 61
CHAPTER 7: THE AID-GROWTH DEBATE IN BANGLADESH: A REFLECTION ...................... 62
APPENDIX.................................................................................................................................... 66
BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................... 71
iii
ABSTRACT
The literature on the aid-growth relationship is rife with debate. Most of the studies on aid
effectiveness are based on cross-country panel analyses that create confusion in respect to
understanding the real impact of aid utilization from an individual country context. Bangladesh, a
developing country of South Asia, is considerably dependent on foreign aid to close the gaps in
development financing. Aid effectiveness is crucial for the prosperity of Bangladesh but it is difficult
to draw a firm conclusion on the impact of aid utilization in Bangladesh from the limited number of
studies conducted thus far. This study assesses the actual contribution of aid to economic growth
and development in Bangladesh. This thesis takes a more qualitative approach than the earlier
studies on Bangladesh, drawing on the subjective findings of the donors, Government of
Bangladesh, research organizations and scholars. It analyses the contribution of aid in terms of
public investment to the economic, social, institution building and environmental sectors. I argue that
the contributions of foreign aid to socioeconomic development, institutional capacity development
and environmental management are significantly positive in Bangladesh. Nonetheless, due to the
impediments to aid effectiveness and systematic deficiencies, Bangladesh has failed to maximise
the benefits of aid utilization. This thesis discusses the aid effectiveness frameworks in Bangladesh
along with the impediments operating against aid utilization in an effort to identify pathways that will
ensure the maximum outcomes of aid utilisation. This study finds a conditional positive impact of
foreign aid on growth and development in Bangladesh.
Keywords:
Foreign aid; public investment; economic growth; social development; institutional competence; aid
effectiveness.
iv
DECLARATION
I certify that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgment any material previously
submitted for a degree or diploma in any university; and that to the best of my knowledge and belief
it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due
reference is made in the text.
Signed
Date 28 May 2018 .
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
After intensive study over the semester, I write this note of gratitude as the finishing touch on my
thesis. It has been a passionate learning period for me, not only at the academic level related to the
issues of development studies but also on a personal level. Researching and writing this thesis has
entailed a significant impact on my critical thinking and logical argumentation. I would like to extend
my appreciation to all the generous people who contributed to the concluding work presented in this
paper by guiding, supporting, motivating and helping me so much throughout this period.
First of all, I would like to convey my sincere gratitude and endless thanks to my thesis supervisor,
Mr. Michael Barr, Associate Professor, for his continuous and invaluable guidance, patience,
feedback and support at each stage of my thesis throughout the period. It is to be noted that he is
my topic coordinator and course coordinator as well. It is not an exaggeration to say that he is
becoming an expert on Bangladesh affairs as he is supervising another couple of students from
Bangladesh covering various aspects of the country. Despite the number of his academic
engagements, he has been enthusiastic and fully cooperative with me, and his academic support
and cooperation have been excellent. Over the period, he has been a mentor for me and I am grateful
and honoured for the opportunity to learn from him.
Profound gratitude goes to Mr. Tony Hollick who has tremendously contributed to editing, proof
reading and synthesising my thesis paper. His precious involvement has made the paper well-
articulated and well-presented. I would also like to acknowledge my fellow Masters’ Degree students
Nitol Chakma, Aziza Rahman, Lily Myat and Bhabhani Dewan for sharing their ideas on designing
and writing thesis papers for social science research.
Special mention goes to the College Administration Staff, Jacqui Forte, who continuously supported
me by providing necessary academic information and arrangements related to my course and the
thesis. I am also grateful to the International Student Centre and the Student Contact Officer for
Australia Awards Scholarships at Flinders University, for their sincere cooperation in academic
issues and other matters related to my life and study in Australia.
This thesis and my study could have not been possible without the unending love, motivation and
mental support from my family. I am evermore thankful and grateful to my wife Tanzima Akter, my
little son Ridwan Kabir and my parents for their inspiration, instigation and profound support. None
of my family members are living with me in Australia but I am virtually connected with them. It is their
motivation that enables me to undertake higher education in Australia.
vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Annual disbursement of foreign aid with aid categories (from FY 3
2012-13 to 2015-16)
Figure 1.2 Impact of aid on growth through increases in savings, as per the 5
‘Harrod-Domar Model’
Figure 3.1 The ratio of loans to grants in aid disbursement (from FY 1971- 20
72 to 2015-16)
Figure 3.2 Percentage of aid categories in aid disbursement (from FY 21

1971-72 to 2015-16)
Figure 3.3 Disbursement of Food Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 21
Figure 3.4 Disbursement of Commodity Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 22
Figure 3.5 Disbursement of Project Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 23
Figure 3.6 Disbursement of Budget Support (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 23
Figure 3.7 Disbursement of foreign aid in major sectors (from FY 1971-72 24

to 2015-16)
Figure 3.8 The ratio of aid categories in total aid disbursement (from FY 25
1971-72 to 2015-16)
Figure 3.9 Outstanding debt by source of aid (from FY 2012-13 to 2015-16) 26
Figure 3.10 Disbursement, repayment of principal and net flow of aid (from 26
FY 2012-13 to 2015-16)
Figure 3.11 Top ten donors as per accumulated disbursement (from FY 27

1971-72 to 2015-16)
Figure 4.1 The ratio of outstanding external debt to GDP (from FY 2009-10 34
to 2015-16)
vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Summary of the cross-country regression analyses based on the 10

first and second-generation studies.
Table 3.1 Total commitment and disbursement in each category of aid (from 25
FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
Table 4.1 Trends in aid flow and the inflation rate (from FY 2008-09 to 2015- 33
16).
Table 4.2 Bangladesh’s aid, 1995-2012, broken down by purpose and 35

expressed as percentages.
Table 5.1 Percentages of ADP utilization and disbursement of aid in FY 48

2014-15 and 2015-16.
Table 6.1 The progress of aid effectiveness measures in Bangladesh up to 57

2010.
viii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ADB - Asian Development Bank
ADP - Annual Development Program
AFT - Aid for Trade
AIIB - Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
AIMS - Aid Information Management System
AP-DEF - Asia Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility
AusAid - Australian Aid
BDF - Bangladesh Development Forum
BNSDS - Bangladesh National Sustainable Development Strategy
BRIC - Brazil, Russia, India and China
CFC - Chlorofluorocarbon
CO2 - Carbon Di-oxide
CPI - Consumer Price Index
CPI - Corruption Perception Index
DAC - Development Assistance Committee
DDM - Double Deficit Method
DFID - Department for International Development
DMA - Dhaka Metropolitan Area
EC - European Commission
EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment
ERD - Economic Relations Division
EU - European Union
FDI - Foreign Direct Investment
FFW - Food for Work
FY - Fiscal Year
GDP - Gross Domestic Product
GFC - Global Fund for Climate Change
ix
GPEDC - Global Partnership for Effective Development
Cooperation
HAP - Harmonised Action Plan
IATI - International Aid Transparency Initiative
IDA - International Development Association
IDB - Islamic Development Bank
IMF - International Monetary Fund
IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
JCS - Joint Cooperation Strategy
LCG - Local Consultative Group
LDCs - Least Developed Countries
MDGs - Millennium Development Goals
MTBF - Medium-Term Budgetary Framework
NGO - Non-Government Organisation
NPDC - National Policy on Development Cooperation
ODI - The Overseas Development Institute
OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

Development
PFM - Public Financial Management
PPP - Public-Private Partnership
SAPs - Structural Adjustment Programs
SWAp - Sector-wise Approach
UK - United Kingdom
UN - United Nations
UNDP - United Nations Development Programme
UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme
VAT - Value Added Tax
VGF - Vulnerable Group Feeding
WB - The World Bank
x
CHAPTER 1: THE FOREIGN AID REGIME IN BANGLADESH
1.1. Motivation
“Foreign aid very often and very accurately, I believe, is a condition of taking
money from the poor people in a rich country and giving it to the rich people of a
poor country.”1
----- Ron Paul, an author and former American Congressman.2
“Aid has been, and continues to be, an unmitigated political, economic, and
humanitarian disaster for most parts of the developing world.”3
----- Dambisa Moyo, an economist and author.4
‘Foreign aid’ or ‘development assistance’ or ‘development aid’ or ‘aid’ is a mechanism to support

poor countries to achieve their long-standing economic, social and human development.5 Rich
countries and multilateral aid agencies extend foreign aid in forms of financial and technical
assistance. Foreign aid, basically comprising of loans and grants, intends to achieve sustainable
development of poor countries through being invested in development initiatives.6 Nevertheless, the
effectiveness of aid in achieving economic development for the recipient countries has always been
open to challenge. Aid has been criticised as a wastage of resources, along with the charge that it
does not aim to develop the poor countries, but continues the dependency of these countries on
foreign aid donors.7 Institutional incompetence, corruption, political instability, macroeconomic policy
issues and environmental hazards of the recipient countries along with aid conditionality from the
donors are the most conspicuous reasons behind the ineffectiveness of aid.8 Bangladesh is a
developing country (for more information on Bangladesh, see Appendix), and it experiences notable
drawbacks in aid management like most other developing countries. A school of thought claims that
aid has not contributed much to the economic growth of Bangladesh, rather it has benefited the non-
democratic politicians and bureaucrats, and also increased unproductive public expenditure.9
1 R. Paul, Pillars of Prosperity: Free Markets, Honest Money, Private Property, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn,
Alabama, 2008, p. 342.
2 Ron Paul is an author and former American Congressman (Texas). He has written several books including Pillars of
Prosperity: Free Markets, Honest Money, Private Property, and A Foreign Policy of Freedom.
3 D. Moyo, Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New
York, 2009, p. xix.

4 Dambisa Moyo is a well-known global economist and author born in Zambia. Her two bestselling books are Dead Aid:
Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa, and Winner Take All: China’s Rush for Resources and
What It Means for the Rest of the World.
5 C. Lancaster, Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and
London, 2008, pp. 44-45.

6 T. Rady, ‘Foreign Aid and Development: What Can Developing Nations Learn’, Journal of Economics and Economic
Education Research, vol. 13, no. 3, 2013, pp. 123-125.

7 F. Bourguignon and M. Sandburg, ‘Aid Effectiveness - Opening the Black Box’, American Economic Review, vol. 97, no.
2, 2007, pp. 316-318; P. Collier, ‘Aid ‘Dependency’: A Critique’, Journal of African Economics, vol. 8, no. 4, 1999, pp. 528-
530.
8 M. In’airat, ‘Aid Allocation, Selectivity, and the Quality of Governance’, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative
Science, vol. 19, no. 36, 2014, pp. 63-65.

9 B. Hossain, ‘The Effect of Foreign Aid on the Economic Growth of Bangladesh’, Journal of Economics and Development
Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, 2014, pp. 103-104.

It is relatively easy to identify development projects in Bangladesh that failed to impact economic
development due to these deficiencies. The evaluation report of one such failed project shows how
aid can be ineffective in achieving its target outcomes. The ‘Dhaka Urban Transport Project’ aimed
to improve urban transport system in the Dhaka Metropolitan Area (DMA), and to strengthen the
institutional competence for long-term transport planning and coordination.10 With a US$177 million
allocation from the World Bank (WB), this project planned to build infrastructure, provide equipment
to the relevant government authorities and procure consultancy services. Although the project was
supposed to be completed in 2005, it was completed in 2006. The Evaluation Report (2007)
appraises that the project could achieve some infrastructure development such as building roads,
road signals and a flyover, but some of the major construction works were dropped due to poor
progress in implementation. Only 53% of the planned infrastructure and services were implemented.
Institutional strengthening and policy frameworks were not achieved due to low quality training and
capacity-building programs.11 A flyover was expected to alleviate the traffic congestion but ultimately
it failed to achieve the outcomes. The WB itself rated the overall project outcomes as moderately
unsatisfactory.12 The performance of both the WB and the government entities has been
unsatisfactory in that they ultimately had negligible impact on development of the concerned sector.
The WB had substantial deficiencies in the project identification, preparation and appraisal phases.
Institutional incompetence such as procedural delays, lack of commitment and accountability,
administrative hurdles, indecisiveness and inadequate planning were the drawbacks from
government authorities behind the project’s failure.13
This particular case study suggests that foreign aid has very little or nothing to contribute to the
economic growth of Bangladesh, implying that aid is a wastage of resources. But, there is more to
the story of aid utilisation in Bangladesh. Despite some limitations in aid management, there is much
evidence that aid is a blessing for Bangladesh and aid has been instrumental to achieve increased
economic growth for the country.14 Donors’ support has been very effective in achieving MDGs,
improving Human Development criteria such as health and education, and meeting the financing
shortfalls in implementing the development projects.15 Therefore, this paper argues that on balance
foreign aid has positive impacts on economic growth and development of Bangladesh by contributing
to capital accumulation and public investment in socioeconomic development approaches. This
paper also claims that presently aid is more feasible than other alternatives for closing the financing
10 The World Bank (WB), Project Performance Assessment Report Bangladesh: Dhaka Urban Transport Project, The WB
Report No. 39323, Dhaka, 2007, pp. 2-3, <http://www.oecd.org/countries/bangladesh/39618742.pdf>, consulted 09 March
2018.
11 The World Bank, pp. 9-10.
12 The World Bank, p. 13,
13 The World Bank, pp. 14-15.
14 M.Q. Rahim, ‘Effects of Foreign Aid on GDP Growth and Fiscal Behavior: An Econometric Case Study of Bangladesh’,
The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 38, no. 2, 2005, p. 95.

15 The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Millennium Development Goals: Bangladesh Progress Report 2015,
Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2015, pp. 9-13, <http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MDGs-

Bangladeh-Progress-Report_-PDF_Final_September-2015.pdf>, consulted 12 March 2018.
2
gaps in Bangladesh, and aid returns can be maximised if aid effectiveness measures are
implemented properly under sound macroeconomic framework.
1.2. Aim and Objective:

Bangladesh is considerably dependent on foreign aid to undertake various development activities
as it has enormous constraint in domestic resources. Figure 1.1 shows that Bangladesh has
mobilised around US$3 billion in foreign aid annually to meet its fiscal deficit in recent years, which
is 1% of the total GDP and 11% of the national budget in a year.16 Bangladesh already has an
outstanding external debt totalling US$29.19 billion. Yet still, both the short-term and long-term future
plans of Bangladesh rely on investing high volumes of aid.17 Bangladesh is continuing its aid
dependency to achieve economic growth while the effectiveness of aid has been controversial for
the developing countries.18
Figure 1.1: Annual disbursement of foreign aid with aid categories (from FY 2012-13 to 2015-16).
4
Billion US$
3
2
1
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Food Commodity Project Budget support
(Source: ERD 2016)
Like most other developing countries, aid effectiveness is a debatable issue in Bangladesh because
it raises some unsettling economic questions. For instance:
i) What are the impacts of aid utilisation on growth and development?19
ii) To what extent does aid effectiveness depend on the macro-economic policy
framework?20
iii) To what extent do corruption, institutional incompetence, political instability and aid
conditionality impede aid effectiveness?21
16 Economic Relations Division (ERD), Flow of External Resources into Bangladesh (As of 30 June 2016), Ministry of
Finance, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2016, pp. 1-8.
17 The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan: FY2016-FY2020, Government of Bangladesh,
Dhaka, 2015, <http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/7FYP_after-NEC_11_11_2015.pdf>, consulted

10 March 2018.
18 N. Gulrajani, ‘Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate: Managerialism, Radicalism and the Search for Aid
Effectiveness’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 2, 2011, pp. 199-200.
19 Hossain, pp. 103-104.
20 K.M. Istiak, ‘Foreign Aid to Bangladesh: Some Iconoclastic Issues’, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 46, no. 1,
2012, p. 331.
21 M.M. Rahaman and N.A. Khan, ‘The Realities of Aid Harmonisation and Aid Effectiveness: Views from Bangladesh’,
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, vol. 32, no. 1, 2010, p. 109.
3
iv) Is aid essential for Bangladesh or are alternative sources, such as internal revenue
generation, more viable than aid?22
This study intends to address these questions and, in doing so, resolves its foremost aim which is to
assess how much foreign aid is contributing to the economic growth and development of
Bangladesh. At the same time, the alternatives of aid, and the impediments for aid effectiveness
along with the likely policy implications that can ensure the optimum benefit of aid utilisation, have
also been explored in this study.
1.3. Justification and Significance

The contribution of foreign aid to economic growth and development as found in aid-growth literature
is indecisive. Researchers like Easterly and Moyo strongly oppose the effectiveness of aid on
development while Hansen and Tarp as well as Moreira intensely believe that aid can positively
impact growth and development.23 Most of the earlier studies focus on the developing countries
overall by using cross-section panel data that created more confusion and thus often concluded with
contradictory outcomes of aid on growth.24 Bangladesh has been included as a sample in some of
the cross-country studies, although it is not enough to investigate the effectiveness of aid in
Bangladesh. Conversely, the limited studies that have been conducted exclusively on Bangladesh
have some limitations such as covering aid data for short periods and overlooking external factors
associated with aid flow.25 Hence, there is enough scope for extensive research in this area to
comprehend the importance and modalities of aid utilisation in Bangladesh. This study contributes
to the existing literature in several areas. Firstly, this study considers the impact of aid consistently
on economic, social, institution building and environmental sectors in Bangladesh. Secondly, this
thesis critically analyses the feasibility of the alternatives of aid for development financing. Finally, it
includes issues related to policy framework, governance, institutional competence and aid
effectiveness that influence aid utilisation procedures in Bangladesh.
Weighing the contribution of aid to economic growth and development in Bangladesh will be
influential to decide whether Bangladesh should prioritise effective foreign aid utilisation to meet the
financing gaps in development activities, or to explore alternative sources of financing like domestic
revenue generation and raising domestic savings. This study will assist policy makers, development
partners and researchers to understand the real effects and importance of aid utilisation in
Bangladesh for it to achieve economic growth and development.
22 Istiak, p. 341.
23 Gulrajani, pp. 199-204.
24 I.O. Fasanya and A.B. Onakoya, ‘Does Foreign Aid Accelerate Economic Growth? An Empirical Analysis for Nigeria’,
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 2, no. 4, 2012, p. 424.
25 M.W.R. Khan and H.A. Ahmed, ‘Dynamics of Foreign Earnings, Assistance and Debt Servicing in Bangladesh’,
International Journal of Development Issues, vol. 11, no. 1, 2012, pp. 76-77.
4
1.4. Theoretical Framework
The modalities and effects of aid utilisation on growth has been highlighted from different points of
views in various aid-growth studies.26 Researchers use different theories and models to develop the
conceptual framework to evaluate the impact of aid on development. The theoretical framework of
aid-growth studies is ever evolving, aligning to the contemporary theories for growth and
development of the day.27
Early aid-growth studies broadly used the ‘Harrod-Domar Model’ of growth which aimed to evaluate
the causal relationship between aid and growth through increases in savings and investment.28 The
basic fundamentals of this model are a) growth or income, b) savings or investments and c) capital-
output ratio. Investment is considered as equal to savings. It is assumed that growth is driven by
productive investment. Poor countries characterised with low savings have low investment and thus
have low economic growth in turn.29 Foreign aid can boost savings-investment nexus and increase
economic growth. This model can be described by using the following diagram:
Figure 1.2: Impact of aid on growth through increases in savings, as per the ‘Harrod-Domar Model’.
Previously, aid-growth studies have also used the ‘Double Deficit Method (DDM)’, prevalently known
as the two-gap model. This model assumes that there might be gaps in savings-investment or export-
import cycles. These gaps are considered as growth deficits which the poor countries mostly suffer
from, mainly due to resource constraints.30 When domestic savings are lower than investment
requirements or the net receipts from exports is lower than the foreign exchange requirements for
imports, the growth of a country is hampered. Foreign aid can close either or both of these gaps,
assist in financing productive economic activity and thus contribute positively to economic growth.31
26 C. Arndt, S. Jones and F. Tarp, ‘Assessing Foreign Aid’s Long-Run Contribution to Growth and Development’, World
Development, vol. 69, 2015, pp. 6-7.
27 T.J. Mekasha and F. Tarp, ‘Aid and Growth: What Meta-Analysis Reveals’, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 49, no.
4, 2013, pp. 564-567.

28 H. Hansen and F. Tarp, ‘Aid and Growth Regressions’, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 64, no. 2, 2001, p. 561.
29 S. Kousar and S. Masood, ‘Factors Promoting Foreign Aid Dependence in South Asian Countries’, South Asian Studies,
vol. 31, no. 1, 2017, pp. 182-184.

30 M. Rahnama, F. Fawaz and K. Gittings, ‘The Effects of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in Developing Countries’, The
Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 51, no. 3, 2017, pp. 154-155.

31 Fasanya and Onakoya, p. 425.
5
The Modernisation Theory of development emphasises promoting education to produce modern
individuals. It is also assumed that technological advancement can stimulate more economic activity
to achieve increased economic growth.32 Modernisation Theory argues that development must be
accompanied by assistance from developed countries in terms of financial and technical assistance
and knowledge.33
The Neoclassical Model of growth also has dominated aid-growth studies. This model concentrates
on the fact that capital accumulation is the key to achieve economic growth. The basic motto of aid
in this model is to accumulate capital in developing countries with a view to having an increased
capital-labour ratio.34 Aid can overcome the cost of capital depreciation and, hence, citizens can
enjoy positive growth in per capita income. The improved version of the Neoclassic Model supports
the belief that, besides capital accumulation, aid contributes to an acceleration toward technological
evolution.35 Moreover, some policy issues that can influence aid utilisation are been taken care of.
The contribution of foreign aid to growth is also acknowledged by the Human and Social
Development Approaches. The Human Development Approach promotes human capital and
capabilities like education, health, equality in income distribution, choice, and freedom and so on.36
The Social Development Approach focuses on the overall well-being of people that makes them able
to participate in economic activities equally and equitably, which eventually leads to increased
economic growth for the country.37 A significant portion of the aid in the form of technical assistance
– utilised in human and social development such as health, education, skills development, social
safety nets, governance, and justice and so on – is useful for development.38
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) – through the Paris
Declaration (2005), the Accra Agenda for Action (2008) and the Busan High Level Forum (2011) –
recognises some guidelines that can ensure better aid utilisation and better impact of aid on growth
and development.39 The Paris Declaration focuses on Ownership, Alignment, Harmonisation,
Results and Mutual Accountability. The Accra Agenda for Action draws attention to Ownership,
Inclusive Partnership, Delivery Results and Capacity Development. Finally, the Busan High Level
Forum adds some integral parts of aid management such as governance, institutional competence,
macroeconomic policy frameworks and global partnership to the guidelines for aid effectiveness.40
32 B. Bull and M. Bøås, ‘Between Ruptures and Continuity: Modernisation, Dependency and the Evolution of Development
Theory’, Forum for Development Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, 2012, pp. 319-321.
33 Bull and Bøås, pp. 319-321.
34 S. Byron, ‘Examining Foreign Aid Fungibility in Small Open Economies’, Open Economies Review, vol. 23, no. 4, 2012,
pp. 700-702.
35 K. Willis, Theories and Practices of Development, Routledge, London and New York, 2005, pp. 45-48.
36 A. Sen, Development as Freedom, Knopf, New York, 1999, pp. 40-42.
37 J.N. Pieterse, Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions, 2nd edn, SAGE publication Ltd., London, 2010,
pp. 130-132.
38 S. Edwards, ‘Economic Development and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid: A Historical Perspective’, Kyklos, vol. 68, no.
3, 2015, pp. 305-306.

39 E. Mawdsley, L. Savage and S.M. Kim, ‘A ‘Post-Aid World’? Paradigm Shift in Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation
at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum’, The Geographical Journal, vol. 180, no. 1, 2014, pp. 28-32.
40 Mawdsley, Savage and Kim, pp. 32-33.
6
Recent studies on the aid-growth relationship inevitably address these aid effectiveness issues. In
addition, recent studies also focus on the impact of aid on environmental protection and management
because environment is a crucial determining factor for sustainable socioeconomic development.41
Considering the evolution of conceptual frameworks of aid-growth studies, this paper measures the
contribution of aid to growth by evaluating the investment of aid in productive economic sectors, the
Human and Social Development Approaches, institutional competence, and environmental
management. The policy frameworks for aid utilisation, progress on aid effectiveness guidelines as
prescribed by the OECD, and the impediments that Bangladesh needs to overcome to optimise the
benefit of aid have also been researched and evaluated.
1.5. Method
This thesis adopts a qualitative approach to investigate how aid contributes to economic growth and
development through investment in the public sector in Bangladesh. This study examines the
underlying relationship of foreign aid with growth and development by assessing the impact of public
investment from aid in terms of socioeconomic development, institutional capacity building and
environmental management. In addition, I have also appraised the progress of aid effectiveness
measures and the weaknesses in aid management in Bangladesh. Furthermore, the probability of
the alternatives to aid in achieving growth has also been critically evaluated. Different secondary
data such as scholarly resources, government reports and donors’ reports pertinent to the
considerable variables and issues have been reviewed for this study. Aid data for the period of 1972-
2016 has been analysed. The effect of aid on different criteria and variables, and the structural
arrangement of aid utilisation as found in the aid-growth studies, have all been compared and
analysed in the context of Bangladesh through reasoning and argumentation by using these
secondary data sources and the results are presented accordingly. The secondary data sources
have been utilised in this study due to time constraints. These secondary data sets are not complete
because different organisations commissioning or collecting the data did so during different periods
of time for the same variables. There might also be reporting inaccuracies and manipulation of
accounts from the different reporting agents.
1.6. Outline of the Paper

This paper is structured as follows. Chapter 2 follows the evolution of aid-growth literature over the
decades in terms of theoretical perspectives and methodological techniques. This chapter also
discusses the alternatives of aid along with their potential limitations in Bangladesh. It argues that
the alternatives to aid are insufficient to meet the financing gaps required for development in
Bangladesh. Chapter 3 highlights the historical background and trends of foreign aid utilisation in
41C. Chao et al., ‘Foreign Aid, Government Spending, and the Environment’, Review of Development Economics, vol. 16,
no. 1, 2012, pp. 62-63.
7
Bangladesh. This chapter also demonstrates the aid investment scenario in different economic and
social sectors in Bangladesh. Chapter 4 is dedicated to the impact analysis of aid on economic
growth and development. This chapter explains the main argument of this paper that foreign aid has
a positive impact on growth and development by contributing to investment and capital accumulation.
Chapter 5 deals with the problems and impediments that Bangladesh faces in aid utilisation.
Particular focus has been given to corruption, institutional incompetence, political instability and aid
conditionality. The likely solutions to the problems in aid utilisation are considered in Chapter 6. The
aid effectiveness measures and the macroeconomic policy frameworks are also covered in this
chapter. This chapter validates the argument that the impact of aid can be maximised if proper steps
are taken to remove the impediments to aid utilisation and ensure aid effectiveness measures.
Chapter 7 concludes the thesis paper by succinctly synthesising the key findings, scope for future
research and policy implications.
8
CHAPTER 2: THE AID-GROWTH DEBATE
2.1. Literature Review

2.1.1. Introduction
Foreign aid has been treated as one of the most important aspects of international relationship
between developing and developed countries for many decades. In addition to supporting diplomacy,
foreign aid started contributing to economic growth and promoting democracy in developing
countries after the Cold War.42 The changes in patterns, modalities and objectives of aid utilisation
have been closely monitored and reported in literature on the aid-growth relationship over the
decades. Developing countries are largely dependent on aid, particularly to finance development
initiatives. Nevertheless, aid effectiveness for economic growth and development has always been
debated, even in aid-growth literature.43 Though several quality studies have specifically aimed to
evaluate the aid-growth relationship, the effectiveness of aid on growth and development in literature
still remains indecisive.44 Literature on aid effectiveness is ever developing in terms of hypothetical,
methodological and conceptual perspectives.
2.1.2. Literature on the impact of aid on economic growth and development

The ‘aid debate’ is one of the most significant phenomenon in aid-growth literature. The debate
ensues based on the disputed impact of foreign aid on macro-economic variables such as economic
growth, poverty and inequality, and the subsequent impact of aid on the overall economic
development of the recipient countries.45 One school of thought claims that aid impacts positively on
growth and development by contributing to capital accumulation and investment in economic activity
and social development.46 In addition, some of the research in this school of thought attribute the
necessity of a policy-centric environment – including economic policies, matters of governance and
institutional competence – as a precondition to ensuring aid effectiveness. Gulrajaini ranks this
school of thought as aid ‘managerial reformers’.47 In contrast, another school of thought argues that
aid makes no contribution to investment or capital accumulation, in turn resulting in no contribution
to growth and development either. They claim that aid is a waste of public money as it increases
corruption and non-productive expenditure of the recipient governments.48 They further claim that
the flow of aid is harmful to the local economy of the recipient as it discourages domestic savings
and investment, while increasing dependency on external powers. Interestingly, most of the aid
42 Lancaster, p. 44.
43 R. Sobhan, ‘Challenging the Injustice of Poverty: Rethinking Aid Strategies’ in S. Folke and H. Nielsen (eds.), Aid Impact
and Poverty Reduction, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2006, pp. 31-32.
44 Fasanya and Onakoya, p. 424.
46 C. Arndt, S. Jones and F. Tarp, ‘What Is the Aggregate Economic Rate of Return to Foreign Aid?’, The World Bank
Economic Review, vol. 30, no. 3, 2016, pp. 469-472.

48 S. Djankov, J. Garcia-Montalvo and M. Reynal-Querol, ‘Does Foreign Aid Help?’, The Cato Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2006,
p. 2.
9
critics are from neoliberal and neo-Marxist schools who uncharacteristically come to consensus
against aid.49 To Gulrajani, these scholars are aid ‘radicals’. The aid debate persists in all
generations of aid-growth literature although it peaks in more recent studies.
2.1.2.1. Generations of aid-growth literature

Hansen and Tarp group the studies on the aid-growth relationship into three different generations.
The ‘First-Generation’ studies during the 1960s considered foreign aid as an “exogenous net
increment of the capital stock of the recipient country”.50 Pro-aid economists counted each dollar
increase in aid as one dollar increase in savings and investments. The researchers mostly used the
‘Harrod-Domar Model’ of growth which expresses the casual correlation of aid with growth through
increases in savings and investment, because capital accumulation is assumed to be the key to
growth.51 The ‘Double Deficit Method’ was also frequently used where the impact of aid is evaluated
from its contribution to export-import gaps or saving-investment gaps. Conversely, despite
recognising the positive impacts of aid in the savings-investment-growth cycle, the First-Generation
study admits that excessive foreign capital inflow may affect the domestic saving tendency of
recipient countries. Since aid is easily available, it reduces the incentives and opportunities for
domestic investors, and this can affect growth in the long run.52
The ‘Second-Generation’ studies during the early 1970s to the early 1990s directly focused on
estimations surrounding the aid-growth relationship instead of the aid-savings relationship, and the
outputs of the aid-growth analyses advocated that aid can impact positively on growth.53 Still, the
focus remained on the role of aid only in capital accumulation to achieve increased economic growth
and the studies of this generation are consistent with the ‘Harrod-Domar Model’ of growth’.54
Table 2.1: Summary of the cross-country regression analyses based on the first and second-
generation studies.
Impact of Aid Savings regression Investment regression Growth regression
Positive 1 17 40
Negative 25 0 1
No relation 15 1 31
Total (131) 41 18 72
Source: Moreira (2005, p.29)
Moreira notes that by using periodical cross-section data, the first and second generation studies
considered aid as an external factor to the economy and the impact of aid on savings, investment

50 H. Hansen and F. Tarp, ‘Aid Effectiveness Disputed’, Journal of International Development, vol. 12, no. 3, 2000, p. 377.
51 Hansen and Tarp, ‘Aid Effectiveness Disputed’, p. 378.
52 K.B. Griffin and J.L. Enos, ‘Foreign Assistance: Objectives and Consequences’, Economic Development and Cultural
Change, vol. 18, no. 3, 1970, pp. 323-325.

10
and growth was calculated and analysed separately.55 Moreira also states that the studies of these
generations believed in the long-standing positive impact of aid on growth (Table 2.1).
The Third-Generation studies have developed both conceptual and methodological modifications in
aid-growth literature. According to Roodman, the ‘Third-Generation’ studies started with Boone’s
work in 1994, are still continuing today.56 Hansen and Tarp differentiated ‘Third-Generation’ studies
from the earlier two generations as considering large panel data from many developing countries
and economic sectors, policy variables (i.e. institutional competence, economic policies),
‘endogeneity of aid’57, separation of aid from foreign capital inflow, and non-linear aid-growth
relationships.58 These more recent Third-Generation studies on the aid-growth relationship use
different stipulations, samples and methods to reach different contested opinions. Even the studies
that use the same data and methods often come to different conclusions!59 These aid-growth studies
broadly conclude that the aid-growth relationship is either positive, or that aid does not impact on
growth, or that aid negatively impacts on growth.60
2.1.2.2. Literature on the positive aid-growth relationship

The recent studies which find a positive aid-growth correlation can generally be clustered as having
‘unconditional’ and ‘conditional’ impact of aid.61 Using various methods and samples, several studies
find a positive aid-growth relationship regardless of the policy environment in the recipient countries.
Moreira goes against the earlier perception of there being a ‘non-existing aid-growth relationship’
and the ‘micro-macro paradox’62, arguing that aid has a straightforward positive effect on growth.63
Hansen and Tarp also find an unconditional, positive and coherent outcome of aid utilisation,
claiming that the aid-growth relationship is not hampered even in a country with an unfavourable
policy environment.64 Showing evidence from Albania, Reci argues that aid is very effective for
delivering public services such as health, education, water and power in poor countries and, thus,
aid is successful from a social development perspective.65 Aided initiatives in Social Development
Approaches and technical assistance in terms of capacity building enhance economic activities,
55 S.B. Moreira, ‘Evaluating the Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study’, The Journal of
Economic Review, vol. 30, no. 2, 2005, pp. 28-29.
56 D. Roodman, ‘The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-Country Empirics’, The World Bank Economic
Review, vol. 21, no. 2, 2007, p. 257.

57 Endogeneity is a change which arises from within a system or model. For instance, a change in donor-recipient
relationship may result in an endogenous change in aid allocation. Due to the changed contexts, the aid flow may increase
or decrease that ultimately may hamper aid-consumption nexus.
58 Hansen and Tarp, ‘Aid Effectiveness Disputed’, pp. 385-386.
59 H. Doucouliagos and M. Paldam, ‘Aid Effectiveness on Growth: A Meta Study’, European Journal of Political Economy,
vol. 24, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1-5.

60 K. Gyimah‐Brempong, J.S. Racine and A. Gyapong, ‘Aid and Economic Growth: Sensitivity Analysis’, Journal of
International Development, vol. 24, no. 1, 2012, p. 19.

61 Gyimah‐Brempong, Racine and Gyapong, p. 19.
62 The perception that aid impacts at micro level only, not at macro level is commonly known as the ‘micro-macro paradox’
63 Moreira, p. 34.
65 A. Reci, ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Foreign Assistance in Albania’, Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, vol. 2, no. 3,
2014, pp. 123-125.
11
ensure the public wellbeing and can eventually encourage both social and economic development
of the beneficiary country.66
Nevertheless, Clemens et al. state that, depending on the policy environment in the recipient country,
aid positively impacts on growth via an increase in investment.67 Burnside and Dollar claim that when
aid is combined with good fiscal, monetary, and trade policies, it can positively contribute to growth,
but aid has an insignificant effect in a poor policy environment.68 By increasing domestic investment,
aid has had a strong positive effect on growth in Nigeria and other developing countries but political
instability in the recipient countries is a great concern for both the recipients and the donors.69 Aid
generates the greatest positive impact on growth when it remains between the thresholds of 6.6%
to 14.4% of the Gross National Income of a recipient country.70 Sachs claims that aid accelerates
capital accumulation, economic growth and household income. He argues that aid is effective for
humanitarian emergencies, financing public sector investments and budgets, and financing private
businesses through micro-finance. This last benefit helps breaking the poverty trap by lifting
households above a subsistence level of existence by increasing their capital stock.71 Sahoo and
Sethi report notable economic growth in India and other developing countries due to aid utilisation,
although growth is not equally translated to economic development because of institutional
incompetence, the unequal distribution of wealth, and corruption.72
2.1.2.3. Literature on the negative or no aid-growth relationship

In contrast to literature on the positive impact of aid, some researchers conclude that aid marks
either zero or negative outcome for economic growth. Conducting different ‘economic analyses’ with
the data of 88 developing countries, Easterly finds no correlation between aid and investment in 87
countries except Zambia and thus concludes growth is not impacted by aid.73 Revisiting the cross-
section of evidence, Rajan and Subramanian also do not find any association between aid and
growth, regardless of the categories of aid and policy environments.74 Conversely, Moyo, one of the
most well-known critics of aid, claims that existing aid mechanism has not had any positive impact
on growth, rather it brings negative growth in most of the recipient nations including African
countries.75 Analysing the African aid data during 1970-2000, she claims that the higher the aid flow,
the lower the economic growth. Djankov, Garcia-Montalvo and Reynal-Querol claim that economic
66 T. Addison, M. Niño-Zarazúa and F. Tarp, ‘Aid, Social Policy and Development’, Journal of International Development,
vol. 27, no. 8, 2015, pp. 1351-1355.
67 M.A. Clemens et al., ‘Counting Chickens When They Hatch: Timing and the Effects of Aid on Growth’, The Economic
Journal, vol. 122, no. 561, 2012, pp. 613-614.

68 C. Burnside and D. Dollar, ‘Aid, Policies, and Growth’, The American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 4, 2000, p. 864.
69 Fasanya and Onakoya, pp. 424-425.
71 J.D. Sachs, The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time, The Penguin Press, New York, 2005, pp. 245-
246.
72 K. Sahoo and N. Sethi, ‘Effect of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth and Development in India: An Empirical Analysis’,
South Asian Journal of Management, vol. 20, no. 1, 2013, p. 132.

73 W. Easterly, ‘Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 17, no. 3, 2003, pp. 32-33.
74 R.G. Rajan, and A. Subramanian, ‘Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?’, The Review
of Economics and Statistics, vol. 90, no. 4, 2008, pp. 659-660.

75 Moyo, pp. 6-8.
12
growth is negatively impacted by foreign aid because aid increases non-productive government
consumption and reduces investment.76
2.1.2.4. Gaps in aid-growth literature

We can find literature supporting the positive aid-growth relationship but then we can find other
literature challenging it. Glennie and Sumner note that most of the studies over the last decade show
the positive effects of aid utilisation and thus suggest aid critics to rethink their negative findings. 77
They claim that debate on aid effectiveness in literature needs to be coherent and evidence-based
as the studies often lack both definitional and methodological perfection.78 Referring to the ‘Paris
Declaration’79, they argue that aid effectiveness issues should not only be prioritised by the recipients
and donors but also be reflected in literature on aid-growth relationship.80 Sometimes literature on
the aid-growth relationship has methodological and econometric weaknesses that may represent
unreliable outcomes of regression studies.81 Tarp states that modern studies generally find positive
impacts of aid on growth although researchers like Easterly often ignore these studies and criticise
aid by using only cross-country works.82 He also notes that cross-country works may not be free of
meaningless data and inappropriate variables which ultimately produce a zero result in the
analysis.83 Proclaiming the positive correlation among aid, growth and poverty reduction, Tarp calls
for extensive and specific country based research to decide on the overall impact of aid on
development.84
2.1.3. Literature on the impact of aid on economic growth of Bangladesh

Turning to Bangladesh, there have been a limited number of studies which have evaluated the
contribution of foreign aid to economic growth. Like other aid-growth literature, the studies on
Bangladesh also find contradictory impacts of aid on economic growth and development. Hossain
claims that foreign aid can be effective for economic growth in Bangladesh, though due to the
institutional incompetence of Bangladesh in effective aid utilisation, aid generates nominal returns in
Bangladesh.85 In the context of savings-investment and export-import gaps, foreign aid generally
raises the investment and savings of a country, but aid impacts inversely on domestic savings in
Bangladesh.86 Islam claims that foreign aid in terms of loans rather than grants, has some positive
impact on growth but domestic resources are actually more instrumental for growth than foreign
76 Djankov, Garcia-Montalvo and Reynal-Querol, p. 2.

77 J. Glennie and A. Sumner, Aid, Growth and Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2016, p. 75.
78 Glennie and Sumner, p. 75.
79 The Paris Declaration (2005) adopted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), frames
a guideline both for the donors and recipients to collectively work on aid effectiveness.
80 Glennie and Sumner, pp. 75-77.
81 Moreira, p. 27.
82 F. Tarp, ‘Aid and Development’, Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol. 13, no. 2, 2006, pp. 46-47.
83 Tarp, pp. 46-47.
84 F. Tarp, ‘Aid, Growth, and Development’ in G. Mavrotas (ed.), Foreign Aid for Development: Issues, Challenges, and
the New Agenda, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010, p. 47.
85 Hossain, pp. 103-104.
86 Istiak, p. 331.
13
aid.87 Rahim argues that loans provided for public investment have a positive impact on growth but
grants are mostly expended in non-productive civil expenditures.88 Bangladesh is making some slow
progress on aid effectiveness but aid cannot promote economic growth unless the aid effectiveness
is ensured as per the ‘Paris Declaration’.89
These studies on the aid-growth relationship in Bangladesh are mostly dependent on data over a
limited period of time and across a limited number of sectors.90 These studies partially consider the
impact of policy variables while measuring the effects of aid utilisation on growth.91 This literature on
Bangladesh mostly focuses on the aid-growth relationship through investment in the economic
sectors only, while aid can contribute to growth through Human and Social Development Approaches
as well.
2.1.4. Conclusion
Studies on the aid-growth relationship mostly denote that aid positively impacts on growth, although
specific and extensive research is required to weigh the real impact of aid on growth and
development in Bangladesh. The study on the aid-growth relationship in Bangladesh needs to
necessitate definitional and methodological perfection which is supported by large and correct panel
data, coherent evidence and appropriate representation of the findings. Furthermore, considering
the impact of aid on economic sectors only is insufficient to analyse the real impact of aid overall
and, thus, the contribution of aid to social development activities is also to be negotiated in aid-
growth literature. In addition, macro-economic policy variables, institutional competence, feasibility
of the alternatives to aid, impediments for aid utilisation and the progress of aid effectiveness
measures in Bangladesh should also be reflected in aid-growth studies on Bangladesh.
2.2. Alternatives to Aid in Bangladesh

2.2.1. Introduction
Bangladesh needs to undertake massive development in the economic and social sectors to attain
increased economic growth but it has a notable constraint in capital formation and infrastructure.92 If
Bangladesh aims to increase its economic growth from 6% to 8%, it needs to invest around 32%-
34% of its GDP each year.93 Bangladesh needs to depend on several external and internal sources
including foreign aid to meet the investment gap.94 Bangladesh mobilises capital for investment
87 A.M. Islam, ‘Foreign Assistance and Development in Bangladesh’ in K.L. Gupta (ed.), Foreign Aid: New Perspectives,
Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, 1999, pp. 228-229.
88 Rahim, p. 95.
89 Rahaman and Khan, p. 109.
90 Khan and Ahmed, pp. 76-77.
91 Khan and Ahmed, pp. 76-77.
92 E.A. Rana and A.N.M. Wahid, ‘Fiscal Deficit and Economic Growth in Bangladesh: A Time-Series Analysis’, The
American Economist, vol. 62, no. 1, 2017, pp. 31-32.

93 Bangladesh could invest 28.9% of its GDP in 2015; The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan,
p. 30.
94 Asrafuzzaman, A. Roy and S.D. Gupta, ‘An Empirical Investigation of Budget and Trade Deficits: The Case of
Bangladesh’, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 3, no. 3, 2013, p. 570.
14
mostly from internal revenue, exports and trade, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), foreign aid, and
domestic debts from the local banks. Recently, the possibility of public investment from the capital
inflow of ‘remittance’95 has also been discussed.96 Considering the disputed impact of aid on growth,
it is often suggested that developing countries should focus on alternative options for public
investment to reduce their dependency on aid.97 This means Bangladesh needs to analyse whether
it will continue its dependency on aid or consider other funding options for necessary public
investment. This discussion intends to evaluate how far the alternatives to aid are viable to meet the
public sector investment gaps in Bangladesh.
2.2.2. Alternative financing options in Bangladesh other than aid

2.2.2.1. Internal Revenue (Taxation)
Internal revenue generation, particularly taxation, is the key source of fiscal resource mobilisation
and management in low-income countries, and Bangladesh is no exception to this.98 Bangladesh
still has a large annual budget deficit, however, which is financed with foreign aid and internal debt.
Bangladesh is repeatedly advised to increase its revenue generation capacity to reduce its
dependency on the debt. Unfortunately, however, the reality is far from expectations.99 Bangladesh
aims to generate a Tax-GDP ratio of 16.1% by 2020. It could only achieve a ratio of 9.3% tax revenue
to GDP in 2015.100 This is far behind of the world average Tax-GDP ratio in 2015 which was
15.06%.101 Only 1% of the population pays income tax and so the Tax-GDP ratio in Bangladesh is
much lower than this of the South Asian countries and other developing nations.102 A poor taxation
system, a weak enforcement of tax law, double taxation through Value Added Tax (VAT) and then
also widespread corruption form the four major causes for this low revenue generation. Bangladesh
needs to launch massive reform initiatives to increase its revenue.103 Since Bangladesh is presently
unable to increase its internal revenue generation, it cannot, therefore, reduce its dependence on
foreign aid.
2.2.2.2. Export and Trade

Export earnings are one of the most crucial components of international trade for a country. 104
Exports contribute to economic growth by maintaining the trade balance and increasing the national
95 Remittance is the inflow of credit to a country from the wages and salaries of its citizens who reside abroad.
96 A.K.M.N. Hossain and S. Hasanuzzaman, ‘Remittances and Investment Nexus in Bangladesh: An ARDL Bounds Testing
Approach’, International Review of Economics, vol. 60, no. 4, 2013, pp. 387-390.
97 P. Aghion et al., ‘When Does Domestic Savings Matter for Economic Growth?’, IMF Economic Review, vol. 64, no. 3,
2016, pp. 393-394.

98 A. Sindzingre, ‘Financing the Developmental State: Tax and Revenue Issues’, Development Policy Review, vol. 25, no.
5, 2007, pp. 619-620; Rana and Wahid, pp. 31-32.

99 M. Hassan and W. Prichard, ‘The Political Economy of Domestic Tax Reform in Bangladesh: Political Settlements,
Informal Institutions and the Negotiation of Reform’, The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 52, no. 12, 2016, p. 1708.
100 The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan, p. 122.
101 The World Bank (WB), ‘Tax Revenue (% of GDP)’, The WB’s website, Washington, D.C., 2018,
<https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.TAX.TOTL.GD.ZS>, consulted 18 March 2018.

102 Rana and Wahid, p. 41.
103 Rana and Wahid, p. 41.
104 S.S. Makki and A. Somwaru, ‘Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade on Economic Growth: Evidence from
Developing Countries’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 86, no. 3, 2004, p. 795.
15
income in Bangladesh.105 To maximise export earnings, trade liberalisation has been a great policy
focus for all countries. Bangladesh started its trade liberalisation in 1992 with a view to achieving
efficient resource allocation, the removal of trade barriers, competitive import substitutions, greater
growth in exports and eventually greater economic growth.106 However, this liberalisation –
comprising technology transfer as capital stock, reducing export duties or policy support – has not
impacted export performance as significantly as hoped.107 Bangladesh still has one of the biggest
trade imbalances in the world as export earnings were only US$31.73 billion in 2017, which was
much lower than import payments of US$48.06 billion in the same year.108 Exchange rate
appreciation, excessive dependency on garment production,109 domestic inflation, lower price
competitiveness and slow progress in removing trade barriers are all problems that slow trade
performance.110 Therefore, it is difficult for Bangladesh to depend on export earnings for deficit
financing without solving these problems first.
2.2.2.3. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)

FDI is a significant contributor to economic growth in developing countries. It is one of the key
instruments to transfer technologies and knowledge, both of which are necessary to stimulate
domestic savings, investment, human development and institutional competence.111 FDI is helpful
for capital accumulation, human capital development and employment generation, thereby reducing
poverty and encouraging growth.112 Bangladesh aims to receive US$9.6 billion – 3% of GDP – in the
form of FDI by 2020 to ease the financing gap.113 There has been an increasing trend in FDI from
US$383.22 million in fiscal year (FY) 1999-2000 to US$2.55 billion in FY 2016-17, though it is still
much lower than expected.114 The government has initiated several one-stop service schemes and
other policy support for foreign investors but attracting FDI has always been challenging for
Bangladesh. Poor infrastructure, energy scarcity, incompetent bureaucracy, corruption and
prolonged business procedures are the foremost impediments to Bangladesh in attracting FDI
compared to its neighbouring countries.115 Bangladesh cannot expect higher FDI until it ensures
political stability, better working conditions for labourers, improved safety measures, smoother
105 M.M. Hoque and Z. Yusop, ‘Impacts of Trade Liberalization on Export Performance in Bangladesh: An Empirical
Investigation’, South Asia Economic Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, 2012, pp. 208-209.
106 Hoque and Yusop, pp. 208-209.
107 Hoque and Yusop, pp. 208-209.
108 World Integrated Trade Solution, ‘Bangladesh Trade Statistics’, The World Bank’s website, Washington, D.C., 2018,
<https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/BGD>, consulted 16 March 2018.

109 Bangladesh’s export earnings are predominantly dependent on the garments production including readymade garments
and knitwear. Other export products except jute have little contribution to export earnings. Detailed statistics on
Bangladesh’s export earnings has been presented in Appendix 4.
110 M.M. Rahman, ‘The Factors Affecting Bangladesh's Exports: Evidence from the Gravity Model Analysis’, The Journal
of Developing Areas, vol.44, no. 1, 2010, pp. 240-241.

111 Makki and Somwaru, p. 796.
112 S.H. Manzoor and M.E. Chowdhury, ‘Foreign Direct Investments in Bangladesh: Some Recent Trends and Implications’,
Journal of Business and Economics Research, vol. 15, no. 1, 2017, p. 21.
113 The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan, p. 115.
114 Bangladesh Bank, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Bangladesh, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2017, p. 23,
<https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/halfyearly/fdisurvey/fdisurveyjanjun2016.pdf>, consulted 15 March 2018.

115 K.M.A. Islam, ‘Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Bangladesh: Prospects and Challenges and Its Impact on Economy’,
Asian Business Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, p. 30.
16
business processes, the necessary infrastructure and preparedness for environmental catastrophes.
FDI has not significantly impacted economic growth in Bangladesh and the government still needs
to do a lot to make FDI an appropriate alternative for development financing.116
2.2.2.4. Domestic Public Debt

Bangladesh is largely dependent on both external and domestic public debt to finance its
development projects as it has a huge budget deficit every year.117 Bangladesh depends on domestic
public debt also to offset its low internal revenue generation to meet other public expenditure. As a
result, domestic public debt reached 23.1% of GDP and 192% of government revenue in FY 2016-
2017.118 The domestic public debt is mainly sourced from the commercial banks’ holdings of treasury
instruments, national savings certificates, and net credit with the central bank known as ‘Bangladesh
Bank’.119 The interest rates for borrowing from commercial banks and national saving schemes are
higher than that tied to foreign aid. Even the interest rate for savings certificates is higher than
commercial bank loans.120 Public borrowing from domestic sources is good for economic growth and
it is welcomed provided that sufficient liquidity prevails in the banking system.121 If there is a liquidity
crisis and domestic public debt is an increasing trend, it will squeeze the opportunity of private
investment and the economy will suffer in the long run.122 Bangladesh should confine its domestic
public debt to an acceptable level that can maintain financial discipline.123 Therefore, it is unwise to
meet the entire financing gaps using domestic public debt only, by ignoring foreign aid.
2.2.2.5. Remittance
Remittance is the inflow of credit to a country from the wages and salaries of its citizens who reside
abroad. Some developing countries are largely dependent on remittance to meet foreign exchange
requirements.124 Bangladesh is also heavily dependent on remittance. In 2009, it was the 8th leading
remittance-receiving country in the world in terms of total amount, and with remittance comprising
around 11% of annual GDP, it was listed among the top thirty countries measured by percentage of
the GDP.125 Bangladesh received US$12.77 as remittance from its non-resident nationals in FY
116 A. Rahman, ‘Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh’,
International Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 7, no. 2, 2015, pp. 182-183.
117 M. Saifuddin, ‘Public Debt and Economic Growth: Evidence from Bangladesh’, Global Journal of Management and
Business Research, vol. 16, no. 5, 2016, p. 72.

118 International Monetary Fund (IMF), Bangladesh: Staff Report for the 2017 Article IV Consultation-Debt Sustainability
Analysis, IMF, Dhaka, 2017, p. 2, <https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/dsa/pdf/2017/dsacr17147.pdf>, consulted 18

March 2018.
119 International Monetary Fund, p. 2.
120 International Monetary Fund, p. 3.
121 M.A. Majumder, Does Public Borrowing Crowd-out Private Investment? The Bangladesh Evidence, Working Paper
Series: WP 0708, Bangladesh Bank, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2007, pp. 1-2,
<http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/WP0708Final.pdf>, consulted 18 March 2018.
122 G. Bua, J. Pradelli and A.F. Presbitero, ‘Domestic Public Debt in Low-Income Countries: Trends and Structure’, Review
of Development Finance, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1-5.

123 Majumder, pp. 4-5.
124 D. Hossain, ‘Differential Impacts of Foreign Capital and Remittance Inflows on Domestic Savings in Developing
Countries: A Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel Analysis’, Economic Record, vol. 90, 2014, pp. 102-104.
125 Hossain and Hasanuzzaman, pp. 387-388.
17
2016-17.126 It has been discussed whether this sizeable amount of remittance can be invested in
public sectors, although no significant initiative or even a government-commissioned study has yet
been instigated. Emigrant nationals are not wholly aware of the business and investment scenario
in Bangladesh and are also ever-confused about the political environment, and thus they are
reluctant to invest in a common fund for these reasons.127 Remittance is one of the key instruments
to maintain the balance of payments for the government and strengthen the foreign exchange
reserve.128 Remittance has the potential to be invested in the public sector in the future by building
confidence among emigrant earners and providing adequate investment mechanisms. Nevertheless,
being private capital, it is claimed that remittance cannot replace foreign aid presently in development
financing.129
2.2.3. Conclusion on the alternatives to aid

It is evident that Bangladesh has considerable resource gaps in its fiscal management. There are
external and internal options for Bangladesh to mobilise capital to meet its fiscal deficit. From the
above discussion it is apparent that, despite having significant potential, the financing options
available such as internal revenue, exports and trade, FDI and remittance are not sufficiently feasible
to cover the financing shortfalls and reduce dependency on debt. Therefore, the government of
Bangladesh must borrow resources from internal and external sources.130 Internal borrowings can
be effective for filling the resource gaps to a certain level and, hence, Bangladesh must borrow from
overseas governments and multilateral aid organisations to plug the remaining gap. Bangladesh
may face some challenges in aid utilisation but it can overcome these hurdles by taking the
necessary steps.131 The next chapters of this paper will explain how foreign aid is an essential
funding option for Bangladesh by positively impacting on growth and development, while also
exploring how Bangladesh can maximise the benefits of aid by overcoming its challenges in aid
utilisation.
126 Bangladesh Bank, ‘Wage Earners Remittance Inflows’, Bangladesh Bank’s website, Government of Bangladesh,
Dhaka, 2018, <https://www.bb.org.bd/econdata/wagermidtl.php>, consulted 18 March 2018.
127 H. Zaman and M.I. Akbar, ‘Exploring Non-Traditional Sources of Development Finance: The Case of Remittance in
Bangladesh’, Progress in Development Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 2013, p. 113.

128 Zaman and Akbar, p. 107
129 Hossain and Hasanuzzaman, pp. 403-404.
130 M.M. Rahman, M.A. Bashar and S. Dey, ‘External Debt and Gross Domestic Product in Bangladesh: A Co-Integration
Analysis’, Management Research and Practice, vol. 4, no. 4, 2012, pp. 35-36.
131 Rahman, Bashar and Dey, pp. 35-36.
18
CHAPTER 3: OVERVIEW OF FOREIGN AID IN BANGLADESH
3.1. Introduction
Bangladesh has been dependent on foreign aid to meet the shortfalls in the financing of the public
sector since it achieved independence from Pakistan through the Liberation War of 1971. Initially it
was largely dependent on grants for humanitarian assistance such as food and commodities, and
reconstruction of war-devastated infrastructure for the survival of this newly born nation.132 Gradually
the economy of Bangladesh has stabilised and it has undertaken a series of development initiatives
to achieve economic and social development for the country. Still, Bangladesh has not yet been able
to overcome its financial shortfalls and remains dependent on aid, although the categories and
modalities of aid utilisation have been considerably modified over time.133 Bangladesh is still
receiving foreign aid generally in terms of loans, which are invested in development projects. Aid is
expended in different economic and social sectors to ensure sustained economic growth, human
capital development, good governance, justice, resistance to environmental disasters, and so on
with a view to achieving sustainable socioeconomic development.134 At the beginning of its
independence, only a few friendly countries and the United Nations (UN) offered aid but currently
Bangladesh receives aid from many bilateral and multilateral countries and organisations.135
Bangladesh mobilises around US$3 billion in aid annually although aid effectiveness in Bangladesh
is still debateable. With this backdrop, this chapter aims to provide a synopsis of aid investment
modalities in Bangladesh.
3.2. Historical Background of Aid Utilisation

Bangladesh’s dependency on aid is closely related to its emergence as a sovereign state from being
a colonised region of Pakistan named East Pakistan. Due to resource constraints and in part due to
international relationships, Pakistan started receiving substantial foreign aid in the late 1950s.136
Initially, both the USA and the socialist bloc were the primary donors for Pakistan, although it
received aid from other OECD countries too. Under the Pakistani rule, East Pakistan (Bangladesh)
suffered economic and political discrimination, and ordinary East Pakistani people suffered
discrimination in employment. West Pakistan drained resources from East Pakistan whose economy
was already vulnerable.137 The discrimination could also be seen in the foreign aid allocation
between these two regions. East Pakistan received insufficient benefit of the aid flow and faced
132 Hossain, ‘The Effect of Foreign Aid on the Economic Growth of Bangladesh’, p. 94.
133 B. Hossain, ‘Nexus between Foreign Aid and Economic Growth: Evidences from Bangladesh’, Global Journal of
Management and Business Research, vol. 14, no. 6, 2014, p. 64.
134 M.G. Quibria, ‘Aid Effectiveness: Research, Policy and Unresolved Issues’, Development Studies Research, vol. 1, no.
1, 2014, pp. 79-80.

135 Economic Relations Division, pp. 5-7.
136 M.A. Obaydullah, ‘Impact of Foreign Aid on Development in Bangladesh’, PhD thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne,
Australia, 2007, pp. 38-39.

137 R. Sobhan, From Aid Dependence to Self-Reliance: Development Options for Bangladesh, University Press Ltd.,
Dhaka, 1990, pp. 7-12.
19
challenges in capital formation. Consequentially, there were huge resource gaps in East Pakistan
which continued even after Bangladesh’s independence. As a further setback, Bangladesh had to
concede a hereditary outstanding debt of US$483 million against the projects which were completed
in its territory before independence.138
After its independence, Bangladesh inherited a dependence on aid from external sources. This was
necessary because Bangladesh had huge resource gaps coupled with a need to meet imminent
requirements such as emergency humanitarian assistance to the newly born nation. The initial flow
of aid was utilised for food, shelter, emergency medicine, rehabilitation of misplaced people and the
reconstruction of necessary infrastructure that was damaged in the war.139 This aid was mostly
bilateral in nature where India and The Soviet Union played the key role. The UN coordinated the
aid received from other sources. The incurred losses of the war were notably recovered by 1973 and
Bangladesh needed to launch some development activities to get its economy growing.140 As the
resource gaps were still there, aid flow continued and eventually aid became the necessary part of
development planning of Bangladesh. Under the First Five-Year Plan (1973-1977), Bangladesh
sourced 100% of the development budget (ADP) from aid, which was around 10% of GDP in those
years. Bangladesh continued financing the ADP totally with aid until the1980s.141 In due course,
Bangladesh’s aid dependency has continued to finance the development budget under different
plans and aid utilisation has remains incorporated into the institutional framework. There have,
however, been several modifications in categories, patterns and modalities of foreign aid in
Bangladesh.
3.3. Categories of Foreign Aid in Bangladesh

Figure 3.1: The ratio of loans to grants in aid disbursement (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16)
Grants Loans
100
80
60
40
20
0
1971-72 1979-80 1989-90 1999-2000 2009-10 2015-16
(Source: ERD 2016)
138 Sobhan, From Aid Dependence to Self-Reliance, pp. 7-12.

139 Hossain, ‘Nexus between Foreign Aid and Economic Growth’, p. 59.
141 Obaydullah, p. 39.
20
Over the years, there have been several changes in categories of foreign aid in Bangladesh. So far,
Bangladesh has received foreign aid basically as Food Aid, Commodity Aid, Project Aid and Budget
Support. Bangladesh has received this aid in the forms of both grants and loans. It is noticeable from
Figure 3.1 that the portion of grants in aid flow is declining while loans are increasing steadily.142 The
grant-loan ratio in FY 1971-72 was 90.5% to 9.5% respectively but this changed to 15% to 85%
respectively in FY 2015-16. Figure 3.2 indicates that Food Aid and Commodity Aid comprised the
major shares of aid in FY 1971-72 at 47.9% and 50% respectively. By contrast, by FY 2015-16, Food
Aid decreased to 0.9% while Commodity Aid decreased to 0% of the total aid. The utilisation of aid
as Project Aid has become the most crucial aid contributor for Bangladesh over the same period
comprising 99.1% of the total aid volume in FY 2015-16, compared to comprising only 1.3% of total
aid volume back in FY 1971-72.143 Bangladesh has occasionally received Budget Support from the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) during FY 1989-90 to 2014-15 and has not received any Budget
Support in FY 2015-16.
Figure 3.2: Percentage of aid categories in aid disbursement (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
100
80
60
40
20
0
1971-72 1979-80 1989-90 1999-00 2009-10 2015-16
Food Commodity Project Budget support
(Source: ERD 2016)
3.3.1. Food Aid

Figure 3.3: Disbursement of Food Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
400
US$ Million
300
200
100
0
1971-72 1979-80 1989-90 1999-00 2010-11 2009-10 2015-16
(Source: ERD 2016)
143 Economic Relations Division, p. 6.
21
Since gaining independence, Bangladesh has depended on Food Aid to address its deficiency in
food supply resulting in part from its war for independence and several natural calamities including
floods, cyclones and famine.144 Figure 3.3 shows that dependency on Food Aid significantly
continued into the 1990s. Bangladesh is almost close to achieving self-sufficiency in food by
increasing its production.145 Therefore, Food Aid is now generally sourced in small volumes and
occasionally on a larger scale to cover the losses incurred from natural disasters. In addition, a
certain level of Food Aid is utilised by different safety-net programs such as Vulnerable Group
Feeding (VGF), Test Relief (TR) and Food for Work (FFW) to provide food support to the people
living in extreme poverty.
3.3.2. Commodity Aid

Figure 3.4: Disbursement of Commodity Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
500
US$ Million
400
300
200
100
0
1971-72 1979-80 1989-90 1999-00 2009-10 2015-16
(Source: ERD 2016)
In general, Commodity Aid is received to source raw materials and intermediate input for production
and manufacturing from donor countries.146 The basic motto is to reduce stress on the Balance of
Payments. Bangladesh has been able to increase both its export earnings and internal revenue in
recent years. Furthermore, the flow of remittance from Bangladesh’s expatriates living abroad has
assisted Bangladesh to have an attractive foreign exchange reserve. Therefore, Bangladesh has
gradually moved into a position of being able to self-manage its Balance of Payments using its own
resources and has thus been able to reduce its dependency on Commodity Aid from 1990, as noted
in figure 3.4, and ultimately it reached to zero in FY 2015-16 accordingly.147
3.3.3. Project Aid

Figure 3.5 shows how currently the prime share of foreign aid in Bangladesh is Project Aid. This type
of aid is received from the donors to finance projects that are being implemented under the ADP.
These projects are categorised as Development Projects and Technical Assistance Projects. The
144 N.T. Dristy, The Macroeconomic Impact of Foreign Aid in Bangladesh Before and After the Paris Declaration,
Bangladesh Development Research Working Paper Series (BDRWPS)-32, Bangladesh Development Research Center
(BDRC), Dhaka, 2016, p. 7, <http://www.bangladeshstudies.org/files/WPS_no32.pdf>, consulted 20 March 2018.
145 S. Sala and S. Bocchi, ‘Green Revolution Impacts in Bangladesh: Exploring Adaptation Pathways For Enhancing
National Food Security’, Climate and Development, vol. 6, no. 3, 2014, pp. 238-239.
22
development projects cover different economic and social sectors to stimulate numerous activities
for economic and social development.148 Technical assistance projects are implemented with a view
to ensuring the institutional competence of government entities from different sectors and
effectiveness of structural reforms in the macroeconomic policy framework.149
Figure 3.5: Disbursement of Project Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16)
2015-16
2009-10
1999-00
1989-90
1979-80
1971-72
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 3000 3300 3600 3900
US$ Million
(Source: ERD 2016)
3.3.4. Budget Support

Figure 3.6: Disbursement of Budget Support (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16)
400
US$ Million
300
200
100
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
(Source: ERD 2016)
Budget support is offered occasionally by multilateral donors in single or multiple instalments to

finance the priority programs of the recipient country.150 The transaction is subject to the
accomplishment of agreed policy requirements and benchmarks between the donor and recipient.151
Budget Support is a popular form of aid as it offers more flexibility for the recipient to spend the
money in the prioritised sectors of its national interest. Bangladesh intermittently received this type
of aid to adopt structural reforms in the 2000s under the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers
(PRSPs).152 Figure 3.6 notes that Budget Support fell to zero in FY 2015-16.
148 M.S. Rahman, M.N. Sadath and L. Giessen, ‘Foreign Donors Driving Policy Change in Recipient Countries: Three
Decades of Development Aid Towards Community-Based Forest Policy in Bangladesh’, Forest Policy and Economics, vol.
68, 2016, pp. 39-40.
149 S.N. Parnini, ‘Public Sector Reform and Good Governance: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Bangladesh’, Journal of Asian
and African Studies, vol. 44, no. 5, 2009, pp. 567-569.

150 N. Molenaers, ‘The Great Divide? Donor Perceptions of Budget Support, Eligibility and Policy Dialogue’, Third World
Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 5, 2012, pp. 791-793.

151 R. Hayman, ‘Budget Support and Democracy: A Twist in the Conditionality Tale’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4,
2011, pp. 679-680.

23
3.4. Aid Investment Scenario by Sector
Figure 3.7: Disbursement of foreign aid in major sectors (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
US$ Billion
10 8.82
9 7.18
8 6.76
7 5.33
6
5 3.68 3.6 3.29
4 2.7 2.54
3 1.83 1.79 1.25
2 0.59
1
0
(Source: ERD 2016)
Bangladesh has 17 sectors (and several sub-sectors under each of these sectors) under the ADP.
Almost all the public investment in the form of development projects are allocated to these sectors.
The aid investment pattern and scenario as indicated in figure 3.7 reflects that Bangladesh utilises
most of its aid in productive socioeconomic sectors. The economic sectors such as Power,
Transport, Communication, Water Resource, Industry and Physical Planning consume the lion share
of foreign aid. The economic sector projects are expected to stimulate economic activities to achieve
energy sufficiency, smooth communication networks, industrial progress, improved infrastructure,
increased export earnings and employment generation.153 The social sectors like health and
education also receive significant amount of aid for social and human capital development initiatives
such as promoting health, education, social justice and gender equality.154 External resources are
also invested in Rural Development and Agriculture to ensure food security for the nation and better
living conditions for rural people. Several social welfare services are also carried out with foreign aid
to improve the living standards of poor people across the country.155 Apart from this, some small
amount of aid supports the government to meet foreign exchange requirements in terms of payment
for crude oil to address the energy deficiency. In addition, a sizable portion of development aid goes
to the public administration sector to bring about reforms in public management with a view to
achieving functional macroeconomic frameworks including different national policies, institutional
competence, better governance and justice.156
Bangladesh invests aid mostly in the productive sectors that cover economic activities, human
development, social services, social justice, poverty reduction and the institutional capacity building
of the government system. It is often questioned whether Bangladesh gets a satisfactory return on
153 The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan, pp. 26-29.
156 Parnini, pp. 569-572.
24
this aid investment or whether this investment is a waste of public money and serves only to increase
the debt burden on the nation.157 Chapter 4 of this paper explores the contribution of aid investment
in these economic and social sectors towards the growth and development of Bangladesh.
3.5. Disbursement of Aid and Debt Servicing Liability

3.5.1. Commitment and disbursement
Table 3.1: Total commitment and disbursement in each category of aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
Aid Category Commitment Disbursement % of Disbursement against

(USS billion) (USS billion) Commitment
Food Aid 6.88 6.87 99.85
Commodity Aid 11.07 10.91 98.55
Project Aid 77.67 47.81 61.56
Budget Support 3.58 3.57 99.72
Total 99.20 69.15 69.71
(Source: ERD 2016)
We can see from Table 3.1 that from independence to June 2016, the donors committed to lending
Bangladesh approximately US$99.20 billion in foreign aid comprising all the categories. Bangladesh
received an aggregated amount of US$69.15 billion out of the committed aid in this period.
Bangladesh received US$26.50 billion as grants and US$42.65 billion as loans of the total disbursed
amount. The disbursement in FY 1971-72 was US$270.8 million before rising dramatically to
US$3.56 billion in FY 2015-16.158
Figure 3.8: The ratio of aid categories in total aid disbursement (From FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
5.2% 9.9%
15.8% FOOD AID

COMMODITY AID
PROJECT AID
69.1% BUDGET SUPPORT
(Source: ERD 2016)
It is indicative from Table 3.1 that the amounts committed as Food Aid, Commodity Aid and Budget
Support were disbursed almost completely. In contrast, the disbursement rate of Project Aid is
comparatively lower than the other categories of aid, although Figure 3.8 shows that Project Aid
occupies the largest share (69.1%) of the public debt from external sources. It is the most crucial
part of aid to Bangladesh not only for being the largest volume but also its contribution to the
economic and social development of the country, which is discussed in Chapter 4 of this paper.
157 Hossain, ‘The Effect of Foreign Aid on the Economic Growth of Bangladesh’, pp. 103-104.
25
Nevertheless, Bangladesh struggles to receive the committed Project Aid due to some procedural
hurdles, institutional incompetence and aid conditions.159 The problems associated with the
utilisation of Project Aid are discussed at length in Chapter 5.
3.5.2. Debt service liability

Figure 3.9: Outstanding debt by source of aid (from FY 2012-13 to 2015-16).
24
21
US$ Billion
18
15
12
9
6
3
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Multi-lateral Bi-lateral Suppliers' credit
(Source: ERD 2016)
Total public debt from external sources was US$973.80 million in FY 1974-75 while figure 3.9 shows
that it reached US$29.19 billion in FY 2015-16. This debt liability was 13.2% of GDP in FY 2015-16.
The debt per capita of the country also rose from US$6.59 in FY 1973-74 to US$182.58 in FY 2015-
16. The total expense of servicing external debt for the government was US$1.05 billion in FY 2015-
16 while the repayment of the principal and interest were US$848.5 million and US$202.1 million
respectively. The net flow, which is the difference between the disbursement and repayment of the
principal, showed a positive value of US$2.715 billion in FY 2015-16 (figure 3.10). This was 27.3%
higher than the previous year. This net flow has always reported a positive value in Bangladesh
since independence.160 In addition, the net transfer, which is the remaining value after paying the
interest on the net flow, has also always recorded a positive value. These positive net flow and net
transfer amounts since 1971 have contributed to capital accumulation in Bangladesh.161
Figure 3.10: Disbursement, repayment of principal and net flow of aid (from FY 2012-13 to 2015-16).
4
US$ Billion
3
2
1
0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Gross Disbursement Prin Repayment Net Flow
(Source: ERD 2016)
159 Parnini, p. 559.

161 Dristy, pp. 7-8.
26
3.6. Major Donors and Aid Conditionality
Figure 3.11. Top ten donors as per accumulated disbursement (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16).
18000
US$ Million
15000
12000
9000
6000
3000
0
(Source: ERD 2016)
Immediately after independence, Bangladesh was supported by few bilateral and multilateral donors;
these were namely the USA, the Soviet Union, India and the UN. Eventually, more donors put their
assistance forward to many of the sectors in Bangladesh; figure 3.11 shows how aid from multilateral
sources has increased significantly since independence. In FY 1971-72, bilateral and multilateral aid
were 85.7% and 14.3% respectively. Inversely, multilateral aid contributed 65.2% of total aid
composition in FY 2015-16 while bilateral aid stood at 34.8%. Nevertheless, there is an increasing
trend in bilateral aid again from FY 2010-11.162 Considering the accumulated contribution, The World
Bank (IDA) is the leading multilateral donor while Japan has been the largest bilateral donor. ADB,
EC, IMF, IDB and the UN are all other important multilateral donors for Bangladesh while the USA,
the UK, Canada, China, Germany, India, South Korea and AusAid are the major bilateral donors.163
The contribution of China and India increased dramatically after 2010 due to geopolitical affairs. 164
AIIB is the latest edition of the multilateral donors. This aid has different conditions – in general and
through to specific.
3.6.1. Financial conditions of aid

The accumulated General Government Debt is US$26.31 billion,165 and this debt is utilised in
different development projects within the ADP. These loans are commonly Medium and Long Term
(MLT) in nature. MLT debt is mostly termed as concessional (soft) aid/loans with weighted averages
of 9.4 years as a ‘grace period’166, 38 years as a ‘maturity period’167 and 28.6 years as a ‘repayment
period’168.169 The weighted average of interest for these loans is 0.92%. These financial conditions

164 C. Wagner, ‘The Role of India and China in South Asia’, Strategic Analysis, vol. 40, no. 4, 2016, pp. 312-313.
165 Total external outstanding debt of Bangladesh up to FY 2015-16 is US$29.19 billion. Out of this, government utilised
US$26.31 billion as General Government Debt for investment in development projects. The rest amount has expended to
repay crude oil prices and state guarantees for different loans taken by the autonomous entities.
166 ‘Grace period’ is counted from the date when the loan becomes effective, to the repayment date of the 1st instalment of
the principal.
167 ‘Maturity period’ runs between the date when the loan becomes effective and the last repayment date.
168 ‘Repayment period’ is the difference between maturity period and grace period, when the repayments are made.
27
of aid are generally much softer than those attached to commercial loans extended by domestic and
international financial institutions.170 It should also be noted that the multilateral loans are more
concessional (softer) than bilateral loans. In addition to these financial conditions, Bangladesh needs
to comply with other conditions to receive aid both from the bilateral and multilateral donors.
3.6.2. Conditions on aid utilisation modalities

Aid conditionality from the donors may be at project, sectoral or macroeconomic policy levels. Some
of the conditions serve donors’ purposes and some aim to improve the performance of Bangladesh
in aid utilisation. At the project level, the donors want to ensure that the relevant government entity
has appraised, formulated and produced the project documents as per the guidelines prescribed by
the respective donor. They also call for quick approval of the project by the government. Financial
expenses are to be done as per donors’ guidelines. Monitoring and coordination of the
implementation of the project need to be strengthened. Safeguard, sustainability and maintenance
plans for the project are also requirements from the donor’s side. The stakeholders’ consultation and
participation, people empowerment, and project accountability are additional concerns for the donors
at the project level.171 At the sectoral level, the donors often impose the conditions of bringing sectoral
reforms before committing any aid. For example, all the loans from the ADB in the railway sector are
conditional upon the implementation of the railway sector reform projects. At the macroeconomic
level, the donors advise the government to reform key policies like procurement guidelines, the
health policy, the education policy, the monetary and fiscal policy, the exchange rate policy, the trade
policy, the tax policy, and the structural adjustment policies and so on.172
The government often cannot resist these pressures due to the vested interests of the domestic and
international political elites.173 Some of the donors impose the condition of appointing consultants
and project managers from the donor’s country for the project. Even, the construction and services
are sometimes to be provided by the big companies of the donor countries. Since the Paris
Declaration, Accra Agenda for Action and Busan High Level Forum, greater attention has been paid
to institutional competence, country ownership, governance, democracy, transparency, human
rights, the environment and gender related issues. The government has modified some of the aid
utilisation modalities to align to donors’ requirements.174
3.7. Modifications in Aid Utilisation Modalities

Immediately after independence, Bangladesh received foreign aid essentially to meet emergency
requirements. However, gradually aid utilisation has become institutionalised in Bangladesh as aid
contributes to the productive socioeconomic sectors as well. The government of Bangladesh

171 Obaydullah, pp. 41-43.
172 Parnini, pp. 564-567.
174 Dristy, pp. 13-15.
28
considered the challenges in aid utilisation and tried to implement various reforms by modifying some
of the aid utilisation modalities. Recognising the importance of donors’ contributions to the
development of Bangladesh on the one hand while enjoying country ownership over the aided
development initiatives on the other, Bangladesh regarded the ‘Donors’ as the ‘Development
Partners’. The conventional donor-recipient relationship has turned into a development partnership
where aid is not only a financing tool but also a partnership-based approach for the overall
development of the country.175 The term ‘aid’ has also been officially replaced by ‘development
assistance’. In the new era of development partnership, the partners are coming up with financial
and technical assistance whereas Bangladesh is prioritising its development requirements and
implementing the projects and programs with mutually agreed guidelines. Still, Bangladesh needs to
ensure some modalities like ownership, aid harmonisation, transparency, mutual accountability,
results-based aid management, institutional capacity development and so on.176
In response to these requirements, Bangladesh has started executing some of the aid effectiveness
measures. Bangladesh is formulating its national plans and aid strategies through consultation with
all the relevant stakeholders including development partners, the private sector, NGOs, civil society,
the media, citizen representatives, local government institutions and other financial institutions.177 It
is working closely with development partners including the Bangladesh Development Forum (BDF),
the Local Consultative Group (LCG) and the South-South cooperation. It has introduced an e-
procurement system and strengthened the monitoring and evaluating procedures of project
implementation. There have been several capacity development programs to improve institutional
competence.178 Detailed discussion on the aid effective measures adopted by Bangladesh and their
progress is covered in Chapter 6 of this paper.
3.8. Conclusion
This chapter intended to provide an overview of the facts associated with aid utilisation in
Bangladesh. It has found that, despite inheriting a dependency on aid mostly in the form of grants,
Bangladesh is gradually moving forward to taking loans instead of grants to utilise aid as
development financing for public sector development projects. Bangladesh has reduced its
dependency on aid in terms of a decreased GDP-aid ratio but still, Bangladesh mobilises a large
amount of aid to finance its development activities. Bangladesh has diversified its source of aid to
several bilateral countries and multilateral organisations, and the financial conditions of these loans
have been beneficial for Bangladesh. The necessity of technical know-how and development
financing in the productive sectors has led to partnerships between Bangladesh and its donors. To
optimise the outcomes of this partnership, Bangladesh has reformed many of its macroeconomic
176 Rahaman and Khan, pp. 118-120.
29
policies and dedicated great commitment to various aid effectiveness measures. Still, the question
remains unsolved whether aid contributes positively to Bangladesh or whether its impact is actually
insignificant, even though so many constructive steps have been taken. The next chapter analyses
the contribution of aid to growth and the development of the country.
30
CHAPTER 4: THE IMPACT OF AID ON ECONOMIC GROWTH
AND DEVELOPMENT
4.1. Introduction
There are several determinants of economic growth and development, and these determinants may
vary from country to country depending on the domestic resources, local political conditions, the
strength of the local economy, and the international relationships of a country.179 Petrakos and
Arvanitidis prioritise Investment, Human Capital, Research and Development, Economic Policies
and Macroeconomic Conditions, Trade Openness, FDI, the Institutional Framework, Political Factors
and Geography as the key determinants of growth, irrespective of whether developed or developing
countries are being examined.180 Bhattacharjee and Haldar highlight Physical and Human Capital,
Openness, Institutional Frameworks and Political Stability as the key determinants for growth and
development for the developing countries of South Asia.181 Turning back to Bangladesh, Income and
Investment, External Trade, Macroeconomic Conditions, the Balance of Payments and Political
stability are the fundamental determining factors of economic growth according to Rao and
Hassan.182 Environmental Management is also a crucial factor for the sustainable development of
Bangladesh.183 Therefore, public investment should focus on these determinants for achieving
growth and development. Chapter 3 demonstrated how foreign aid is an essential part of public
investment, being invested in public sector development projects. To evaluate the impact of aid on
growth and development in Bangladesh, one must analyse what the impact is of these aid
investments on the determining factors for development. For better synchronisation, this chapter
clusters the impact of aid into four categories – Macroeconomic Variables, Human and Social
Development, Institutional Capacity Building and Environmental Management. This chapter argues
that foreign aid contributes positively to economic growth and development in Bangladesh.
4.2. The Impact of Aid on Macroeconomic Variables

In this section, I present an overview of the issues surrounding the impact of aid on macroeconomic
variables in Bangladesh. I analyse the relationship of aid with the core macroeconomic determinants
for growth being Public Investment, Macroeconomic Conditions, Trade, FDI, Domestic Savings and
Internal Revenue Generation in order to assess the impact of aid on macroeconomic variables in
Bangladesh.
179 G. Petrakos and P. Arvanitidis, ‘Determinants of Economic Growth’, Economic Alternatives, vol. 1, no. 1, 2008, pp. 11-
13.
180 Petrakos and Arvanitidis, pp. 14-17.
181 J. Bhattacharjee and S.K. Haldar, ‘Economic Growth in South Asia: Binding Constraints for the Future’, Journal of South
Asian Development, vol. 10, no. 2, 2015, p. 231.
182 B.B. Rao and G.M. Hassan, ‘An Analysis of the Determinants of the Long-Run Growth Rate of Bangladesh’, Applied
Economics, vol. 44, no. 5, 2012, pp. 572-573.

183 J.M. Ayers et al., ‘Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation into Development: A Case Study of Bangladesh’, Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, pp. 37-39.
31
4.2.1. Aid and Public Investment
Investment in the public sector is one of the most essential determining factors to achieve economic
growth of a country. Due to domestic resource constraints, like most other developing countries,
Bangladesh depends on foreign aid to fill its gaps in public investment. All forms of foreign aid raise
capital accumulation and investment; it is thus, an efficient method to achieve economic growth and
development for developing countries.184 Traditionally, Bangladesh has a dependency on aid to run
public sector investment projects under the ADP. Bangladesh financed the ADP in 1773-74
completely with aid. Although Bangladesh has gradually reduced its financing of the ADP from the
aid it receives, it is still investing large amounts of aid into the public sector.185 In FY 2015-16
Bangladesh spent US$11.12 billion on the ADP, with investment from domestic resources versus
foreign aid being US$8.22 billion and US$2.9 billion respectively.186
Most of the project aid, along with technical assistance, has been utilised in the productive economic
sector. Public investment in transport and communications, power and energy, industry,
infrastructure and water resources have stimulated economic activity in Bangladesh. As a result,
Bangladesh is satisfactorily achieving an economic transformation from a rural-based agricultural
economy to an urban-based manufacturing and service-oriented economy with technological
progress and employment generation.187 While the agriculture sector is substantially subsidised with
public investment, Bangladesh is about to achieve food self-sufficiency188 – an area where aid has
played a considerable role.189 This investment has been functional in achieving and sustaining
steady economic growth of above 6% for the country over the last decade. Moreover, after the
repayment of the principal plus interest, the net flow of aid to Bangladesh has always been
positive.190 Therefore, aid is helpful for physical and financial capital accumulation, and public
investment in Bangladesh. Nonetheless, Bangladesh could only utilise 67.1% of the committed
project aid (refer to figure 3.8) and failed to maximise the benefits of aid utilisation. This indicates
that, despite Bangladesh benefitting from the positive impact of aid, it still struggles to use the
committed project aid completely because of some issues associated with aid utilisation. Chapter 5
of this paper widely discusses the challenges for aid effectiveness in Bangladesh.
184 Moreira, p. 34; Sachs, pp. 245-246.

187 The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan, pp. 2-20; It can be seen in Appendix 3 that the
share of Agriculture to GDP in Bangladesh is continuously reducing and has reached at 11.70% in FY 2015-16. In contrast,
Manufacturing and Service have occupied the major portion of the rest of the shares of GDP. This indicates that
Bangladesh is transforming to be a manufacturing and service-based economy.
188 Sala and Bocchi, pp. 238-239.
189 Rahman, Sadath and Giessen, pp. 40-41.
32
4.2.2. Aid and Macroeconomic Conditions
Table 4.1: Trends in aid flow and the inflation rate (from FY 2008-09 to 2015-16).
Variables 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16

Aid
Disbursement 1847.31 2227.77 1776.74 2126.48 2811.00 3084.39 3043.07 3542.51
(in US$
million)
Rate of 6.66 7.31 8.80 10.62 7.70 7.35 6.40 6.16

Inflation
(Source: ERD 2016)
Rao and Hassan focus on issues related to the inflation rate, public consumption, ‘the real exchange
rate’191, the balance of payments, and the level of external debt as the key components of the
macroeconomic conditions of Bangladesh.192 The inflation rate is the measure of change in the
percentage of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in each year. A lower inflation rate is beneficial to
achieve economic growth.193 It is a standard criticism that foreign aid impacts negatively on the
inflation rate if it remains unutilised; however, it has a positive impact when it is utilised in productive
sectors.194 When foreign aid is invested in productive sectors, it results in having a positive impact
on the inflation rate in Bangladesh. Table 4.1 shows that there is a non-linear relationship between
aid and the inflation rate, although in most of the cases it is positive. The congenial Monetary Policy
has contributed to the declining of the inflation rate in Bangladesh.
If the recurrent expenditure of aid is directed at public sector investment and, more specifically, into
productive sectors such as capital projects and infrastructure, the impact of aid will be positive on
public consumption.195 To maximise the impact of aid, public consumption should be focused on
traded goods rather than non-traded products.196 In Bangladesh, aid is mostly utilised in the
productive sectors for procuring materials for the construction of infrastructure including roads,
bridges, power plants, railways, and infrastructure for industry, buildings and other public facilities.
So, the public usage of aid investment should be positive for Bangladesh.197 However, it needs to
be acknowledged that there may also be some suspicious public usage of aid due to corruption,
which is discussed in the upcoming chapter of this paper.
191 The nominal exchange rate is the price of a currency against another currency. For instance, US$1=AUD1.3. In contrast,
real exchange rate is the relative price of goods between two countries. For example, with this rate, the Australian can
trade their own goods for those of the United States.
192 Rao and Hassan, pp. 572-573.
193 M.U. Ahmed, M.M. Muzib and M.M. Hasan, ‘Inflation, Inflation Uncertainty and Relative Price Variability in Bangladesh’,
Eurasian Economic Review, vol. 6, no. 3, 2016, pp. 390-391.

194 A.A. Hossain, ‘Inflation Volatility, Economic Growth and Monetary Policy in Bangladesh’, Applied Economics, vol. 47,
no. 52, 2015, p. 5683.

195 S. Feeny and T.R.L. Fry, ‘How Sustainable is the Macroeconomic Impact of Foreign Aid?’, Journal of Policy Modeling,
vol. 36, no. 6, 2014, p. 1075.

196 S.B. Amin and M. Murshed, ‘An Empirical Investigation of Foreign Aid and Dutch Disease in Bangladesh’, The Journal
of Developing Areas, vol. 52, no. 2, 2018, p. 180.

33
It is often claimed that external resources in terms of aid may cause currency appreciation of the
recipient country and negatively impact the real exchange rate and export earnings of the country.198
On the one hand, Amin and Murshed claim that foreign aid does not hamper the real exchange rate
in Bangladesh and hence has no harmful impact on export earnings and economic growth.199 On the
other hand, foreign aid has historically been effective to maintain the Balance of Payments for
developing countries and to stimulate export earnings by fulfilling the foreign exchange requirements
of the recipient country.200 Referring to government reports, Dristy notes that foreign aid has been
effective for maintaining the Balance of Payments in Bangladesh by mitigating the foreign exchange
and import-export gaps.201
There has been a long-standing controversy regarding the limit of external debt for a country. Figure
4.1 shows that the external debt limit can go up to a maximum of 40% of the GDP,202 and the total
external outstanding debt of Bangladesh has always been below this threshold.203 In addition,
according to Gyimah-Brempong, Racine and Gyapong, aid returns the most positive impact for a
country when it persists within the range of 6.6% to 14.4% of the GDP or the National Income of a
country.204 Figure 4.1 notes that it was 13.6% and 13.2% of the GDP respectively in FY 2014-15 and
2015-16. As aid remains within the expected threshold of the aid-GDP ratio, it has a positive impact
on growth in Bangladesh.
Figure 4.1: The ratio of outstanding external debt to GDP (from FY 2009-10 to 2015-16).
50.00%
40.00% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40% 40%
30.00%
21.40%
20.00% 17.60% 15.60%
21.15% 13.20%
10.00% 16.60% 13.60%
0.00%
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Debt to the GDP Threshold level: Debt to the GDP
(Source: ERD 2016)
4.2.3. Aid and Trade

Aid can be instrumental to promote international trade for developing countries. The export earnings
of the least developed countries are hampered due to weak infrastructure, low quality products,
inadequate loan schemes and an incompetent business environment.205 Aid for Trade (AFT)
198 Z. Askarov and H. Doucouliagos, ‘Spatial Aid Spillovers during Transition’, European Journal of Political Economy, vol.
40, 2015, p. 81.
199 Amin and Murshed, p. 180.
200 Tarp, ‘Aid and Development’, pp. 21-22.
201 Dristy, p. 7.
202 IMF has determined in 2010 that the maximum limit of the aid ratio to the GDP for developing and emerging nations
can be 40%.
205 M. Busse, R. Hoekstra and J. Königer, ‘The Impact of Aid for Trade Facilitation on the Costs of Trading’, Kyklos, vol.
65, no. 2, 2012, pp. 143-145.
34
approaches – aimed at reforming relevant policies – are effective at removing these limitations to
trade and, hence, aid encourages global trade for poor countries to achieve increased economic
growth.206 AFT has been effective for Bangladesh to overcome infrastructural constraints and to
reform different policies such as the National Land Transport Policy, the National
Telecommunications Policy, and the International Long Distance Telecommunication Services
Policy so as to enjoy increased export earnings.207 Bangladesh, under a ‘Comprehensive Trade
Policy’, focuses on increasing its export diversification and ensuring its trade openness by using
AFT, which is projected to impact positively on the export earnings and economic growth of the
country.208
4.2.4. Aid and FDI

Table 4.2: Bangladesh’s aid, 1995-2012, broken down by purpose and expressed as percentages.
Infrastructure Aid
Aid for Social infrastructure 37.73
Aid for Economic infrastructure 28.06
Aid for Production and services 7.67
Aid for Multi-sector/cross- cutting 9.03
Non-infrastructure Aid
Aid for Commodity aid and general programme assistance 4.94
Aid for Action relating to dept. 7.77
Humanitarian aid 4.80
Total 100
(Source: Bhavan 2014, p. 1782)
FDI promotes the economic growth of a country by contributing to employment generation, meeting
the saving-investment gaps, and via the sharing of knowledge and managerial skills for forward and
backward linkages in the production sectors.209 It is helpful for creating new market facilities, cheap
production amenities, technological affluence and additional financing in Bangladesh.210 As in most
other developing countries, foreign aid in Bangladesh can facilitate effective FDI inflows by being
invested in the relevant social and economic infrastructure.211 Analysing the FDI data of Bangladesh
for the period of 1995 to 2012, Bhavan claims that aid which is invested in social infrastructure such
as education, health and skills development, and economic infrastructure like transport, energy and
206 M. Vijil and L. Wagner, ‘Does Aid for Trade Enhance Export Performance? Investigating the Infrastructure Channel’,
The World Economy, vol. 35, no. 7, 2012, pp. 838-841.
207 Hasanuzzaman, ‘Assessing the Aid for Trade (AFT) Agenda: Bangladesh Case Study’, Asia-Pacific Business Review,
vol. 6, no. 2, 2010, pp. 13-14.

209 M. Dion and J. Parlinggoman, ‘The Role of High-Tech Exports and of Foreign Direct Investments
(FDI) on Economic Growth’, European Research Studies, vol. 20, no. 4A, 2017, pp. 197-198.
210 S.M. Reza et al., ‘The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows on Economic Growth: Evidence from Bangladesh’,
Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, vol. 12, no. 2, 2018, pp. 212-214.
211 T. Bhavan, ‘Effectiveness of Foreign Aid in Facilitating Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from Four South Asian
Countries’, Asian Economic and Financial Review, vol. 4, no. 12, 2014, pp. 1770-1772.
35
financial services, has a significant impact on promoting the flow of FDI.212 Table 4.2 shows that
82.49% of the aid in Bangladesh is utilised as economic and social infrastructure aid. Therefore, aid
contributes positively to the economic growth and development of Bangladesh by improving the
necessary infrastructure for attracting an inflow of FDI.
4.2.5. Aid and Domestic Savings

The key determinant of economic growth is investment. Investment schemes are expected to be
financed from the domestic resources and savings accrued from national income such as export,
revenue and private capital.213 Developing countries have resource constraints in almost all of the
categories and suffer from low domestic savings.214 To meet the savings-investment gap, particularly
with regard to development expenditure, developing countries depend on external resources such
as foreign aid which is effective to reduce investment deficits. Kousar and Masood claim that foreign
aid has a positive impact on investment but negative impacts on domestic savings in developing
countries because it is often invested in unproductive sectors such as government consumption. 215
Analysing the aid data of Bangladesh from 1971-2008, Istiak concludes that foreign aid is required
in Bangladesh to meet investment gaps but foreign aid itself does not raise domestic savings.
Therefore, there is a positive relationship between aid and investment, but aid and domestic savings
are independent variables and they cannot influence each other.216
4.2.6. Aid and Domestic Revenue Generation

The flow of aid to developing countries is often criticised with the charge that aid reduces tax
initiatives and, hence, this reduces domestic savings, which ultimately inspires recipient countries to
be more dependent on donor countries. Conversely, it is claimed that aid in terms of grants increases
the flow of public money and discourages improvements to the taxation system. By contrast, it is
claimed loans are substantially effective for reforming the taxation system because technical
assistance and additional investment are helpful for reforming tax infrastructure and ensuring an
efficient taxation structure.217 In Bangladesh, the donors always try to instigate the government to
undertake reform programs to maximise revenue generation. The pressure from donors, especially
from the IMF and the WB, has been continuously mounting since 2009. As a result, Bangladesh has
started implementing several reform measures. Although the reforms have not been accomplished
yet and Bangladesh is still to get optimum benefits from these reforms, there are some successful
212 Bhavan, pp. 1777-1780.

213 P. Sahoo and R. Dash, ‘Financial Sector Development and Domestic Savings in South Asia’, Economic Modelling, vol.
33, 2013, pp. 388-390.
214 I. Gocer, T. Akin and S. Alatas, ‘The Effects of Saving-Investment Gap on Economic Growth in Developing Countries:
A Clustering and Panel Data Analysis’, Theoretical and Applied Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, 2016, pp. 169-170.
215 Kousar and Masood, pp. 182-184.
216 Istiak, p. 341.
217 J. Thornton, ‘Does Foreign Aid Reduce Tax Revenue? Further Evidence’, Applied Economics, vol. 46, no. 4, 2014, pp.
359-361; P. Clist, ‘Foreign Aid and Domestic Taxation: Multiple Sources, One Conclusion’, Development Policy Review,
vol. 34, no. 3, 2016, pp. 379-380.
36
implications of these aided programs on the taxation system.218 Appendix 2 shows that Bangladesh
has been able to increase its Tax Revenue up to US$19.4 billion in FY 2015-16 which was only
US$7 billion in FY 2007-08. Apart from this, as Bangladesh mostly receives aid as loans and not as
grants, it has some positive impacts on domestic taxation and revenue.
4.3. The Impact of Aid on Human and Social Development

Human Development Approaches aim to develop human capital with a view to making an individual
capable of taking part in the development process via his or her own capability. Human capital such
as education, health and skills development are the most necessary requirements for Human
Development.219 If the human development schemes are successfully implemented, a nation can
achieve faster economic growth and development. The social development and social welfare
initiatives mostly focus on reducing income poverty and inequality.220 Therefore, these days,
developing countries aim to expend a significant portion of the national budget on social development
and human development initiatives. The Government of Bangladesh also undertakes several
schemes for human and social development, and similar to the economic sector projects,
Bangladesh is largely dependent on aid to implement these social development initiatives.221
Bhavan names the human development approaches as an ‘investment in social infrastructure’. He

also shows that Bangladesh invested 37.73% of the total aid flow into social infrastructure during
1995-2012 (see table 4.2). As a result, economic activities increased and human development
approaches returned a better FDI inflow, remittance and self-employment; which all contributed
positively to economic growth.222 Health aid, which is invested in Bangladesh as sector-wide
approaches (SWAps), created treatment facilities, awareness building on health and nutrition among
people, and eventually contributed to an increase of the average life expectancy.223 Most importantly,
it is a government-owned comprehensive health program where all the donors provide health aid
within the sector program that ensure aid harmonisation in terms of effective budget support. 224
Foreign aid also plays a significant role in promoting education and skills development in
Bangladesh. There are several technical assistance projects that are aimed at curriculum
development, teachers’ professional development, and the skills development of both the students
and the labour force via both formal and non-formal education including general education, technical
education and madrasha (Islamic) education.225 These human development approaches contributed
218 Hassan and Prichard, pp. 1708-1710.

219 G. Koehler, ‘Some Preliminary Reflections on Development, Public Policy and Welfare States’ in G. Koehler and D.
Chopra (eds.), Development and Welfare Policy in South Asia, Routledge, New York, 2014, p. 16.
220 Quibria, pp. 79-80.
221 Dristy, pp. 7-8.
222 Bhavan, pp. 1770-1772.
223 H. White, ‘The Bangladesh Health SWAp: Experience of a New Aid Instrument in Practice’, Development Policy Review,
vol. 25, no. 4, 2007, pp. 451-454; Some of the health indicators including life expectancy can be seen in Appendix 1.
224 White, pp. 451-454.
225 G.M. Alam, ‘The Role of Technical and Vocational Education in the National Development of Bangladesh’, Asia‐
Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, pp. 25-26; The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh
Five Year Plan, pp. 602-608.
37
to achieving a better Human Development Index (HDI),226 and 6 (out of 8) socioeconomic MDG
targets achieved, including poverty reduction, the net enrolment in primary education and reducing
child mortality.227 It is expected that these human development approaches will be effective to
achieve the SDGs by 2030 as well.228
Apart from these human capital approaches, people awareness programs regarding population
growth, gender, inequality and self-employment also play significant roles for the social development
in Bangladesh.229 Mahmud claims that the South Asian countries including Bangladesh spend very
little on human development and social development initiatives from their own revenue generation.
Foreign aid plays a commendable role to mitigate investment gaps in such approaches.230 Aside
from being given to the government, a sizable portion of foreign aid is also directed to the NGOs in
Bangladesh, particularly for social development programs. Using foreign aid, several NGOs operate
social services such as health, education, skills development, microfinance, employment generation,
legal aid, gender equality, social justice and poverty reduction for marginalised Bangladeshis.231
Another important feature of social development strategies in Bangladesh is several social welfare
programs in the form of social safety nets, which aim to improve the living standards, equality and
social justice for people living in extreme poverty. There are several cash and food transfer programs
for the elderly people, freedom fighters, primary school children, poor people, the unemployed poor,
widows and so on.232 Some examples are the VGF, TR and FFW programs, which are all financed
by aid for the distribution of food aid in particular.233 The human and social development approaches
supported with foreign aid are collectively contributing to economic growth and social transition in
Bangladesh.
4.4. The Impact of Aid on Institutional Capacity Building

Petrakos and Arvanitidis note that intuitional framework is important for shaping the economic
performance and development of a country. The institutional framework generally includes
institutions that are responsible for regulatory activities, governance, macroeconomic stabilisation,
226 Bangladesh is noting a consistent improvement in its HDI value since 1990. Detailed statistics on Bangladesh’s HDI
can be seen in Appendix 1.
227 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Bangladesh's Progress on the MDGs’, UNDP’s website, New York,
2018, <http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/post-2015/millennium-development-goals.html>, consulted

06 April 2018; United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Bangladesh Improves in Human Development Index’,
UNDP’s website, New York, 2017, <http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/ourwork/news/bangladesh-
improves-in-human-development-index/>, consulted 03 April 2018
229 M. Mahmud et al., ‘Development Transformation in Bangladesh: An Overview’ in Y. Sawada, M. Mahmud and N. Kitano
(eds.), Economic and Social Development of Bangladesh: Miracle and Challenges, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018, p,
15.
230 W. Mahmud, ‘Social Development in Bangladesh: Pathways, Surprises and Challenges’, Indian Journal of Human
Development, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008, pp. 85-86.

231 Mahmud et al., pp. 15-20.
232 M.M. Rahman, ‘Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Social Safety Net Programmes in Bangladesh’, The Journal
of Development Studies, vol. 50, no. 11, 2014, pp. 1550–1554.

38
social insurance and the management of political conflict.234 These institutions not only pursue
economic growth but also influence growth in other areas such as physical and human capital, public
investment and technological progress. Instability in politics, the legal system, the level of corruption
and the bureaucratic process may affect economic growth and development adversely.235 Therefore,
strengthening the institutional capability is crucial to achieve sustained economic growth and
development.
One of the worrying issues for most developing countries is that they themselves do not initiate
sufficient reform programs for the building of institutional capacity. It is the donors who often influence
them to undertake several reform programs related to policy, governance, democracy, efficient
bureaucracy and effective macroeconomic and fiscal management.236 Addison and Tarp claim that
aid-assisted initiatives have been successful – not only in promoting supply-side economics covering
investment, human capital, physical capital and exports – but also in supporting institution building
in terms of quality financial management and the taxation system.237
Development partners started propelling the Government of Bangladesh to reform some of the
macroeconomic policies including the fiscal policy, monetary policy, trade policy and procurement
policies specifically from the 1990s. Donors have also imposed conditions on aid to ensure
transparency and accountability, efficient public administration, human rights, democracy and public
sector reforms.238 In addition, participatory governance, and the inclusion of local citizens and gender
mainstreaming in project management have attracted donors’ concern.239 In response to the donors’
requirements, Bangladesh has been trying to implement several aid-assisted reform projects for the
last three decades.240 So far, Bangladesh has spent the second largest portion of total aid (7.18%)
on the public administration sector (see figure 3.7). These initiatives have been aimed at the
strengthening of the judiciary, law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, democratic
institutions, and decentralisation and public administration reforms; and while there has notable
progress, these initiatives have been faced with huge challenges.241 The government adopted the
National Integrity Strategy (NIS) in 2012 along with e-governance, all with a view to promoting the
reforms but corruption and political instability has remained the major impediments to ensure
intuitional competence.242 Despite efforts with foreign aid, the Government of Bangladesh is not fully
in harmony with donors’ views of speedy reform of public administration following neoliberal
234 Petrakos and Arvanitidis, pp. 15-16.

235 Bhattacharjee and Haldar, pp. 230-231.
236 M.S. Winters and G. Martinez, ‘The Role of Governance in Determining Foreign Aid Flow Composition’, World

237 T. Addison and F. Tarp, ‘Aid Policy and the Macroeconomic Management of Aid’, World Development, vol. 69, 2015,
pp. 1-5.
238 Parnini, pp. 553-554.
239 W. Waheduzzaman, ‘Politics and Policy in Achieving Participatory Governance in a Developing Country Context’,
Politics and Policy, vol. 43, no. 4, 2015, pp. 474-476.

240 Waheduzzaman, pp. 474-476.
39
concepts. The absence of good governance, corruption, a lack of political commitment and political
instability are all hindrances to the reforms and building of institutional capacity.243 So far, foreign aid
has had some positive but slow impacts on institution building in Bangladesh due to a range of home-
grown challenges and aid conditions imposed by the donors. As the core problems lie with the local
system of the recipient country, aid itself is not responsible for its failure to make a sizeable impact
on institution building in Bangladesh.244 The next chapter discusses how these institutional
weaknesses deprive Bangladesh of enjoying the maximum benefits not only from the huge
development paradigm but also foreign aid utilisation in Bangladesh.
4.5. The Impact of Aid on Environmental Management

The impact of climate change on development is of great concern to the world, especially to
developing countries. The impact of climate change is generally experienced through natural
disasters, which affect the development paradigms and cause intolerable suffering for poor
people.245 Since environmental management, climate change adaption and disaster management
are now considered as crucial determinants for sustained economic growth and sustainable
development, donors now commit to much work for the sake of environmental protection.246 There
has been a shift in aid management to focus on mitigating the global challenges of climate change
and achieving global environmental goals, along with improving the livelihoods of the poor in
developing countries. Development assistance itself cannot ensure environmental objectives are
met, rather it is the responsibility of both the aid agencies and development institutions to work
together toward environmental protection.247
As a consequence of global warming and the impact of climate change, Bangladesh now suffers
from drought, unwarranted rainfall, frequent cyclones, immense landslides, destructive floods, rising
salinity, siltation, water-logging, deforestation and tidal overflows.248 Bangladesh is one of the most
at-risk or prone countries to the impact of climate change in the world according to the IPCC. Global
warming is projected to raise the sea level and submerge two-thirds of the country by 2100.249
Therefore, Bangladesh needs to mitigate the impact of climate change to ensure sustainable growth
and development for future generations.
Bangladesh has already started working with the global community for climate change mitigation
and has undertaken noticeable initiatives. With support from United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP), the ‘Bangladesh National Sustainable Development Strategy-NSDS (2013)’
243 Parnini, pp. 571-572.

244 Addison and Tarp, pp. 1-5; Parnini, pp. 571-572.
245 Ayers et al., pp. 37-39.
246 Chao et al., pp. 62-63.
247 C. Arndt and F. Tarp, ‘Aid, Environment and Climate Change’, Review of Development Economics, vol. 21, no. 2, 2017,
pp. 285-288.
248 A.K.M.A. Sabur, ‘Disaster Management System in Bangladesh’, India Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 1, 2012, pp. 30-35.
249 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ‘Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability’, IPCC’s
website, Geneva, 2016, <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=41>, consulted 2 April 2018.
40
has been adopted in respect to environmental management and disaster management through
mitigation of the climate change challenges.250 The development partners along with several
international NGOs have been supporting the government to reduce the emission of greenhouse
gases like CO2 and CFC as well as other causal factors of climate change.251 Collaborative efforts
among the government and development partners had raised a total of US$390 million as Global
Funds for Climate Change (GFC) by 2015. Several aid agencies are financing the environmental
protection and disaster management approaches which have made Bangladesh capable of facing
its natural disasters with fewer casualties and economic losses than previously. In 1991, a single
cyclone with a wind speed of 225 km/h, a Cyclone Severity Index of 6,252 and covering the eastern
coastal area of Bangladesh killed 138,958 people. By contrast, the last of the devastating cyclones
named Sidr (2007), which had a wind speed of 250 km/h, a Cyclone Severity Index of 7, and covering
the south-western coastal area of Bangladesh killed 4234 people only.253 The aided approaches
such as the construction of cyclone-centres, improved policy support, disaster readiness training,
public awareness building and the building of institutional capacity have all successfully contributed
to the preparedness of Bangladesh to mitigate the risks and casualties associated with climate
change.254 In addition, the government is trying to ensure Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA)
for its capital investment projects, which is seen as a key part of mainstreaming environmental
management.255 Despite all these efforts and the potential of the GFC to protect its ecosystem,
Bangladesh is still to ensure effective utilisation of all the GFC due to the barriers of corruption,
institutional incompetence and some aid conditions.256
4.6. Findings and Conclusion

Bangladesh mobilises a sizable portion of its development financing from aid which is mostly
invested in public sector development projects. This chapter intended to evaluate how much these
investments are contributing to the economic growth and development of the country. The
determinants of economic growth and development were broadly categorised into four segments
(that is, macroeconomic determinants, social and human development, institution building and
environmental management) and the impact of aid on each of the segments were analysed
separately. The relationship of aid to macroeconomic determinants such as Public Investment,
Macroeconomic Conditions, Trade, FDI and Internal Revenue Generation were found positive,
251 Sabur, p. 43.
252 Cyclone Severity Index is prepared based on the size of the cyclone considering the wind speed and areas covered.
The index starts from 1. The destructiveness of cyclones goes up as long as the index moves high.
253 U. Haque et al., ‘Reduced Death Rates from Cyclones in Bangladesh: What More Needs to Be Done?’, Bulletin of the
World Health Organization, vol. 90, no. 2, 2012, pp. 150-151.

254 Sabur, pp. 38-39.
255 S.H. Shakil and T.H. Ananya, ‘Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Bangladesh Perspective’,
Bangladesh E-journal of Sociology, vol. 12, no. 1, 2015, pp. 115-116.

256 N. Tashmin, ‘Can Climate Finance in Bangladesh Be Helpful in Making Transformational Change in Ecosystem
Management?’, Environmental Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, pp. 9-10.
41
whereas aid has no relationship with Domestic Savings. The macroeconomic conditions – for
example, the inflation rate, public consumption, the balance of payments and the level of external
debt – are positively influenced by the flow of aid but aid impacts very little on the real exchange
rate. Nonetheless, effective aid utilisation is of great concern as this needs to be ensured to achieve
the maximum benefits of aid in the macroeconomic sector. Development assistance was found to
be successful in human and social development approaches that promote education, health, skills
development, equality, poverty reduction, social protection and justice. In the case of institution
building, aid noted some positive progress but this progress is very slow due to some challenges
such as corruption, political instability, bureaucratic delays and some conditions imposed upon aid
being given. The aided approaches in Bangladesh are effective for environmental management, the
mitigation of the impact of climate change as well as disaster management. Even still, Bangladesh
is struggling to utilise aid for climate change effectively due to corruption, institutional incompetence
and aid conditions.
Foreign aid in Bangladesh makes a significant and positive contribution to economic growth and
development, essentially through capital accumulation and public investment in macroeconomic
sectors, human and social development approaches, institutional capacity building programs and
environmental management. Despite noting positive impacts, foreign aid sometimes cannot return
the expected outcomes due to aid utilisation challenges in Bangladesh. The next chapter elaborately
discusses the most critical impediments that restrain Bangladesh from reaping the highest benefits
of aid utilisation.
42
CHAPTER 5: IMPEDIMENTS TO AID EFFECTIVENESS
5.1. Introduction
Bangladesh mobilises foreign aid to meet deficit financing in the development budget. It utilises most
of the aid in productive socioeconomic sectors. The previous chapter expresses that foreign aid has
a notable positive impact on economic growth and development by virtue of these investments. At
the same time, it is to be noted that Bangladesh failed to maximise the benefits of aid investment
due to some impediments to aid utilisation. There are number of reasons that restrain the recipient
countries from receiving full benefits of aid utilisation. Generally, transparency and accountability,
governance, institutional capability and political stability of the recipient country are the preconditions
for effective aid utilisation.257 Prioritising sectors for investment with aid is also very important. In
addition, there must be smooth coordination in donor-recipient, institution-institution of the recipient,
and donor-donor nexus to ensure effective aid management.258 The recipient countries often fail to
meet these preconditions of foreign aid conjuncture that eventually bring aid into criticism.259 In
Bangladesh, several home-grown deficiencies within the government system and political conditions
have posed challenges for effective aid utilisation.260 Some aid conditionality from the donors as
external factors are also responsible for slow and poor aid utilisation. In this context, this chapter
aims to discuss the major impediments to aid utilisation in Bangladesh. Here I predominantly discuss
how corruption, institutional incompetence, political instability and aid conditionality affect aid
effectiveness in Bangladesh.
5.2. Institutional Incompetence

Government practices and institutional strengths in Bangladesh bear the testimony of an unforeseen
competition among the interest groups who hold the key positions in the government. The main
institutions of the government mechanism – being the political, economic, administrative, regulatory
and legislative authorities – are mostly controlled by these vested groups in virtue of their position.261
The frequent military dictatorships during 1975-1989 and dysfunctional democratic system
afterwards are responsible for creating challenges in establishing a functional government system
by strengthening the institutions.262 As a result, the government system is greatly hampered and
eventually not mature enough to establish and reform the key institutions or refine the operational
processes and management strategies to push the country forward with a more competent
257 E. Kim and J. Lee, ‘Busan and Beyond: South Korea and the Transition from Aid Effectiveness to Development
Effectiveness’, Journal of International Development, vol. 25, no. 6, 2013, pp. 791-794.
258 M. Owa, ‘Revisiting the Paris Declaration Agenda–An Inclusive, Realistic Orientation for Aid Effectiveness’,
Development in Practice, vol. 21, no. 7, 2011, pp. 987-989.

259 Addison and Tarp, pp. 1-5.
261 Q. Alam and J. Teicher, ‘The State of Governance in Bangladesh: The Capture of State Institutions’, South Asia: Journal
of South Asian Studies, vol. 35, no. 4, 2012, pp. 858-859.

262 Alam and Teicher, pp. 858-859.
43
system.263 These systematic faults are challenging for all sorts of development and non-development
expenditures and initiatives. The political willingness and bureaucratic adeptness are preconditions
for an effective government system but Bangladesh has shortfalls in these areas. The political issues
have been discussed in another section of this chapter. In this section, I focus on the bureaucratic
incompetence as the systematic weakness of Bangladesh.
The structure and operational modalities of Bangladesh’s bureaucracy originated from British
colonial rule, and have been inflexible in nature to accept reforms and modernisation after
independence. The politicisation of the governance and administrative system as well as civil-military
exclusivities combined to decrease the accountability and transparency of the administration; this,
in turn, nourished a bureaucracy generally characterised with dominance and corruption.264 The
developing partners of Bangladesh ask the government to undertake reform measures to ensure
good-governance with a transparent and functional public administration as a precondition of
providing aid.265 The government is also interested in public sector reforms and has initiated several
measures in terms of good-governance activities, capacity-building programs and strengthening of
monitoring systems with the support of aid agencies to develop a government system of international
standard.266 Still, Khan and Islam claim that an underdeveloped political system, the politicisation of
public institutions, dominating bureaucrats, poorly trained and less skilled officials, a lack of long-
term monitoring and feedback mechanisms, and low quality capacity-building programs are
hindering leadership development in public sector management.267 They also note that the
implementation of the aided reform programs are slow and their achievements are severely
inadequate. As a result, Bangladesh is still struggling to ensure the institutional competence and this
failure impedes the development activities as well as effective aid utilisation.
The deficiencies of the government system affect aid utilisation in several ways in Bangladesh.
Firstly, the poorly functioning government mechanism fails to address the real development
necessities of the country and, thus, the flow of aid can often be misdirected to unproductive sectors
and the aid is, therefore, wasted.268 Secondly, the weak monitoring system cannot ensure the quality
implementation of the aided projects. The lack of coordination among relevant government entities
may cause an overlapping of aid utilisation which is also a waste of public money.269 Thirdly,
systematic weaknesses encourage more corruption as well as unproductive and suspicious public
consumption, resulting aid becoming derailed and not returning its expected outcomes. Fourthly,
institutional incompetence reduces the bargaining capacity of the government bodies, which
263 Alam and Teicher, pp. 858-859.

264 M.A.H. Mollah, ‘Growth and Development of Civil Service and Bureaucracy in Bangladesh: An Overview’, South Asian
Survey, vol. 18, no. 1, 2011, p. 137.
265 Parnini, pp. 553-554.
266 H. Zafarullah and R. Rahman, ‘The Impaired State: Assessing State Capacity and Governance in Bangladesh’,
International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 21, no. 7, 2008, pp. 748-749.
267 M.M. Khan and M.S. Islam, ‘Public Sector Leadership Development in Bangladesh: Present State and Future
Prospect’, The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, vol. 10, no. 1, 2014, pp. 17-22.
44
restrains them from enjoying the same status as the donors in the negotiation process.270 Hence,
they need to accept whatever conditions are imposed by the donors. Finally, the systematic
deficiencies cannot fulfil the donors’ requirements for governance and institutional strengths, and
thus the donors are often discouraged to disburse the committed aid.271 The institutional
incompetence in Bangladesh affects aid utilisation and, hence, Bangladesh should continue its
reform programs to develop an effective government system in order to ensure aid effectiveness and
maximise the benefits of aid.
5.3. Corruption
Foreign aid has noteworthy positive impacts on achieving economic growth for developing countries
but economic growth is not equally transformed to economic development due to corruption
alongside institutional deficiency and uneven resource distribution.272 Corruption is a major
development problem in South Asian countries. Transparency International’s ‘Corruption Perception
Index (CPI)’ shows that the SAARC member countries generally receive low scores with Bangladesh
generally remaining at the bottom of the index. Regrettably, Bangladesh achieved among the lowest
scores in the index from 2001 through to 2005.273 Bangladesh was positioned 143rd of 180 nations
in 2017 on the CPI. The position of Bangladesh only improved as the position of other corrupt
countries deteriorated. Corruption in Bangladesh has become an art form among the interest groups
of the political and bureaucratic hierarchy.274 The inclination towards corruption in Bangladesh is
rooted in the absence of good-governance. Having acquired a pervasive character, corruption is an
impending threat for the development of the country as a whole, which may cause unending suffering
and socioeconomic crises for the country in the future.275
Corruption has had a long-running negative impact on the economic development of Bangladesh.
Pulok and Ahmed, in their study for the period of 1984-2013, show that corruption negatively
impacted on real GDP per capita in Bangladesh.276 They also claim that government expenditure –
in terms of public investment sourced both from domestic and external resources – had a positive
impact on economic development but corruption reduced the volume of public investment because
the resources were utilised for unproductive and suspicious consumption.277 They further show that
corruption caused about a 28% reduction in public investment in the investment-growth nexus and,
hence, had a demolishing impact on public investment, growth and development. Corruption reduces
270 R. Berlinschi, ‘Reputation Concerns in Aid Conditionality’, The Review of International Organization, vol. 5, no. 4, 2010,
pp. 446-447.
272 Sahoo and Sethi, p. 132.
273 Transparency International, ‘Corruption Perception Index: Overview', Transparency International’s website, Berlin,
2018, <https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview>, consulted 08 April 2018.

274 S.H. Bhuiyan, ‘Modernizing Bangladesh Public Administration through E-governance: Benefits and Challenges’,
Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, 2011, pp. 54-57.

275 M.S. Mashreque, ‘Politics of Rural Development in Bangladesh: Manipulation, Criminalization and Corruption’,
Himalayan and Central Asian Studies, vol. 19, no. 1/2, 2015, p. 11.
276 M.H. Pulok and M.U. Ahmed, ‘Does Corruption Matter for Economic Development? Long Run Evidence from
Bangladesh’, International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 44, no. 3, 2017, pp. 358-359.
277 Pulok and Ahmed, pp. 358-359.
45
the economic performance of Bangladesh and hinders the public service delivery system, seriously
affecting poverty reduction and social justice approaches.278 The foreign aided initiatives related to
public investment and service delivery in Bangladesh are also challenged by the pervasiveness of
corruption.
Foreign aid is extended by donors to Bangladesh to implement specific programs on the basis of
national requirements, as included in the long-term and annual plans of Bangladesh.279 The corrupt
system, however, often results in showy projects that are the result of political influence, nepotism
or corruption.280 Aid flows are often directed based on the ministries’ communication, presentation
skills and maintaining of relationships with the donors rather than the actual necessities in that
particular sector.281 As a result, the productive sectors struggle to receive necessary aid allocation.
In the procurement process, corrupt systems intentionally award contracts to the companies allied
to corrupt politicians or bureaucrats so that they can get personal benefits. Again, the selection of
clients for service delivery is also hampered by this corruption. The food aid and financial incentives
earmarked for poverty reduction programs often do not reach the targeted poor.282 In addition, a
significant portion of aid money is paid as salary to government officials and the staff of the aid
agencies.283 This tendency towards corruption by vested interest groups obstructs institution
building, which in turn, results in the failure of quality implementation of development projects. As a
result, there could be a mistrustful donor-recipient relationship. Hence, corruption is one of the major
impediments for all development approaches and it needs to be reduced to maximise the benefits of
aid utilisation as well.
Bhuiyan urges the promotion of an e-governance system covering all government business, thereby
ensuring greater transparency and reducing corruption levels to establish an efficient and cost-
effective service delivery process for the people of the country.284 Institutional reforms, public
awareness building and obliterating the drawbacks of policies and programs are also important for
reducing corruption.285 If the level of corruption can be reduced, Bangladesh can maximise its
economic growth by achieving the expected benefits of aid utilisation.
5.4. Political Instability

Political stability is a necessary determinant for the growth and development of a country. Political
instability adversely affects development, particularly of the low-income countries, by hampering the
evolution of efficient economic and political institutions. In addition, political instability negatively
278 Bhuiyan, pp. 59-60.

281 M.G. Quibria and S. Ahmad, Aid Effectiveness in Bangladesh, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper 10299, Munich,
2007, pp. 30-31. <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10299/1/MPRA_paper_10299.pdf>, consulted, 13 April 2018.

282 Mashreque, pp. 20-22.
283 Mashreque, pp. 20-22.
284 Bhuiyan, pp. 59-60.
285 Pulok and Ahmed, pp. 358-359.
46
impacts on growth and development as it affects the public investment process and accumulation of
both physical and human capital.286 Foreign aid is expected to alleviate the socioeconomic conditions
of the recipient country but political stability is a requirement to make aid operationalised. Although
weakness in both the donors’ operational modalities and the recipients’ management system
negatively impact on aid effectiveness, the recipients’ institutional arrangement and political
condition are mostly responsible for the disappointing outcomes of aid utilisation.287 Therefore,
modern studies on aid are mainly focused on both the external and internal issues and modalities
that can ensure the effective utilisation of aid. Bearce notes that aid effectiveness is conditional on
the economic and political conditions of the recipient countries, and that political regime type or
democratic behaviour of the political system are even more important than the economic condition.288
Political instability or undemocratic behaviour of the political system have been challenging for the
sustainable socioeconomic development of Bangladesh. The political performance of Bangladesh is
non-functional because all three fundamental organs of the state (that is, Legislative, Judiciary and
Executive) remain almost ineffective in performing their designated functions.289 There is a lack of
coordination among the three organs and there has been an ever-evolving conflict between the
presidency and parliament since independence. In addition, the country endured 15 years of military
rule after 1971 and the resulting power imbalance in the civil-military relationship greatly hampers
the democratisation of the major political institutions.290 Moreover, politicisation of the civil
bureaucracy, local government institutions and law enforcement agencies has further worsened the
democratic characteristics of the state. Nonetheless, the main reason for political instability is the
result of internal power struggles and accumulated mistrust among the political parties; mainly
between the two major parties namely the Bangladesh Awami League and the Bangladesh
Nationalist Party.291 Modalities of general elections, handing over the power, increasing mistrust,
ideological differences, disregarding each other’s development policies and excessive power
inclination are the causes for the clashes between the two parties.292 Most of the people of the
country support these two parties and hence are politically divided. Both the parties do not practice
democracy within themselves, often engage in political violence and steer the nation toward political
turbulence and uncertainty.293
286 M.A. Uddin, M.H. Ali, and M. Masih, ‘Political Stability and Growth: An Application of Dynamic GMM and Quantile
Regression’, Economic Modelling, vol. 64, 2017, pp. 610-611.
287 N. Dutta, D. Mukherjee and S. Roy, ‘Re-examining the Relationship between Domestic Investment and Foreign Aid:
Does Political Stability Matter?’, International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 29, no. 3, 2015, pp. 259-261.
288 D.H. Bearce, ‘Reconsidering the Effect of Political Regime Type on Foreign Aid Effectiveness’, International
Interactions, vol. 39, no. 3, 2013, pp. 416-417.

289 Q. Fatima and K. Imran, ‘Political Development and Modernisation in Bangladesh’, South Asian Studies, vol. 32, no. 1,
2017, pp. 123-124.

290 Fatima and Imran, pp. 111-112.
291 M.M. Karim, ‘Socio-economic and Political Development of South Asian Countries: In Bangladesh Perspective’,
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, vol. 2, no. 2, 2013, pp. 29-30.
292 M. Hassan and S. Nazneen, ‘Violence and the Breakdown of the Political Settlement: An Uncertain Future for
Bangladesh?’, Conflict, Security and Development, vol. 17, no. 3, 2017, pp. 205-207.
293 A. Ahmad, ‘Bangladesh in 2012: Economic Growth, Political Under-development’, Asian Survey, vol. 53, no. 1, 2013,
pp. 78-80.
47
Table 5.1: Percentages of ADP utilization and disbursement of aid in FY 2014-15 and 2015-16.
ADP Utilization Foreign Aid Disbursement
Variables 2014-15 2015-16 Variables 2014-15 2015-16

(BDT billion) (BDT billion) (US$ million) (US$ million)
Allocation 860.00 970.00 Commitment 5252.60 7048.08
Utilization 712.14 867.45 Disbursement 3005.54 3531.72
% 82.82 89.42 % 57.22 50.11
(Source: ERD 2016)
Political instability is harmful for economic growth in Bangladesh because it discourages both local
and foreign investments, which obstructs capital accumulation. The undemocratic behaviour of the
political institutions is responsible for reducing the credibility of the government because it enhances
both the level of corruption and institutional incompetence.294 Political uncertainty is a concern for
the government and development partners because political violence, corruption and conflict
interrupt development initiatives.295 Whenever the political turbulence is at a peak, Bangladesh
experiences a low implementation of the ADP and a relatively low disbursement of aid. For example,
there were severe political clashes after the Bangladesh Awami League won the 2014 general
election. These clashes seriously affected all the development activities across the country in that
period as there were several strikes from the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party.296 Moreover,
some of the infrastructure was greatly damaged by these activities. As a result, only 82.82% and
89.42% of ADP allocation was utilised in FY 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively (Table 5.1). It is also
to be noted from Table 5.1 that only 57.22% and 50.11% of the committed aid was disbursed
respectively in FY 2014-15 and 2015-16, which were two of the lowest disbursements by percentage
since the independence.297 Changes in power often entail changes in the national priorities and the
country frequently experiences discontinuation of development approaches by a new government.298
This also affects foreign aid project implementation and the disbursement of aid. Project
implementation is also hampered due to interference of the political parties as they often receive
different undue facilities including bribes from project personnel and the contractors.299 The
politicised administration and law enforcement agencies cannot prevent these undemocratic
practices. Therefore, less functional political institutions, political violence, political interference and
frequent shifting in national priorities affect effective aid utilisation in Bangladesh.
294 S.N. Parnini, and M.R. Othman, ‘Democratic Consolidation and Credibility of Governance Institutions in
Bangladesh’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, 2014, pp. 34-35.
295 M.U. Ahmed and M.H. Pulok, ‘The Role of Political Stability on Economic Performance: The Case of
Bangladesh’, Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, vol. 34, no. 3, 2013, pp. 81-82.
296 Hassan and Nazneen, pp. 216-218.
298 F.A. Osman, ‘Bangladesh Politics: Confrontation, Monopoly and Crisis in Governance’, Asian Journal of Political
Science, vol. 18, no. 3, 2010, pp. 324-325.

299 Osman, pp. 324-325.
48
5.5. Aid Conditionality
The donor-recipient relationship determines the implementation modalities of foreign aid
development projects as well as the level of aid flow and, hence, is very important for aid
effectiveness. The typical donor-recipient relationship is generally characterised by a resource flow
from developed countries to developing countries along with sets of conditions. This aid conditionality
has two aspects. Firstly, donors set prerequisites to reform the institutional frameworks of recipient
countries. The reform includes macroeconomic and financial policies, institutional capacity building,
governance and democracy, justice, gender equality, human rights and monitoring systems for
project implementation.300 Secondly, donors sometimes impose strict conditions upon the recipients
so as to serve their own interests related to geopolitical, diplomatic and economic affairs.301 For
example, donors ask for support from the recipient in respect to their own position on global issues
or to promote their materials, technical know-how, personnel and companies in the recipient
countries.302 The conditions related to the institutional development of the recipient country are
desirable because these can assist the recipient to grow as a politically and economically resilient
state.303 However, the recipients neither initiate the reforms themselves nor willingly comply with the
donor initiated approaches. Rather they develop an attitude of dependency among themselves and
expect the reforms to be executed by the donors themselves.304 This tendency affects administrative
reforms and institution building that impedes the recipient countries to adopt necessary policies and
transformations to ensure aid effectiveness.305 On the one hand, conditions that serve donors’
interests have long-term negative impacts on the recipient’s economy by limiting the opportunities
of local enterprises while, on the other hand, affect the aid flow if the recipient fails to meet the
demands of the donors.306 Therefore, the imbalance of the donor-recipient relationship is considered
one of the reasons why aid returns diminishing outcomes.307 In addition, donors have some lack of
coordination among themselves in managing the flow of aid in the same sector. As a result, there is
some overlapping in aid utilisation and hence, aid harmonisation is affected.
Bangladesh needs to comply with some conditions for borrowing aid from the bilateral and
multilateral development partners. Immediately after independence, Bangladesh mostly received
unconditional grants from the donors which was helpful to meet the immediate humanitarian
300 N. Molenaers, S. Dellepiane and J. Faust, ‘Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid’, World Development, vol. 75, 2015,
pp. 8-9.
301 O, Stokke, ‘Aid and Political Conditionality: Core Issues and the State of the Art’ in O. Stokke (ed.), Aid and Political
Conditionality, Frank Cass, London, 1995, pp. 1-5.

302 L. Tajoli, ‘The Impact of Tied Aid on Trade Flows between Donor and Recipient Countries’, Journal of International
Trade and Economic Development, vol. 8, no. 4, 1999, pp. 374-375.

303 A. Scholl, ‘Aid Effectiveness and Limited Enforceable Conditionality’, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 12, no. 2,
2009, pp. 377-378.

304 Berlinschi, pp. 446-447.
305 S. Dietrich, ‘Donor Political Economies and the Pursuit of Aid Effectiveness’, International Organization, vol. 70, no. 1,
2016, pp. 69-70.

306 Tajoli, pp. 374-375.
307 J.S. Davies, ‘Against Partnership: Toward a Local Challenge to Global Neoliberalis m’ in R. Hambleton and J.S.
Gross (eds.), Governing Cities in a Global Era, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2007, pp. 199-202.
49
requirements. When Bangladesh focused on implementing development projects with aid, it faced
several challenges in terms of mis-governance and institutional incompetence, and its fiscal
management was also questionable. Democracy in Bangladesh is relatively new and fragile. Also,
the institutions have not been developed to a fully functional level. Since the 1990s, the donors
started imposing conditions of reforming the political and economic environment of the country.308
By the end of the 1990s, the implementation of SAPs, governance, democracy and public-sector
reforms for poverty reduction measures became the major conditions for receiving development aid
in Bangladesh.309 Despite taking some donor-driven initiatives, the expected reforms were still not
achieved. Later, aid conditionality was incorporated into the PRSPs (adopted in 2001), MDGs and
Sector-wide Approaches (SWAPs). Nonetheless, Bangladesh did implement several reforms in its
policy environment in terms of its trade policy, procurement guidelines, and monetary policy and so
on but these reforms returned very little due to lack of country ownership of the reform programs.310
These reforms partially failed due to an unequal power relationship between the government and
donors where the donors dominated and imposed governance conditions on Bangladesh and did
not allow Bangladesh to determine its own development discourses.311 Therefore, the
noncompliance with the conditions required for aid continuation affected both the flow of aid and the
effectiveness of the disbursed aid. Recently, the OECD, through the Paris Declaration and The Accra
Agenda for Action, has adopted a new agenda for improved aid effectiveness measures and it is
expected that the new tools will increase partnerships and mutual cooperation between the
government and its development partners. The next chapter discusses what Bangladesh has done
so far against the new agenda for aid effectiveness and what it has achieved so far.
5.6. Conclusion
Foreign aid has made a significant contribution to economic growth in Bangladesh through
investment and capital accumulation but there are many shortfalls in Bangladesh that reduce the
effectiveness of aid utilisation. Both the internal deficiencies within the Bangladesh institutional
system and external issues associated with donors’ operational procedures collectively challenge
aid effectiveness in Bangladesh. The political, economic, administrative, regulatory and legislative
authorities in Bangladesh are not capable enough to design, implement and monitor their obligations
as per expectation. The immature democracy, corruption, politicisation of civil bureaucracy, political
clashes and political uncertainty have obstructed the country to produce an efficient system of
governance. Therefore, it is difficult for Bangladesh to benefit from the impact of the massive
development initiatives it has been implementing over the years. Foreign aid efforts are expected to
contribute to both investment and reforms of the macroeconomic frameworks. Aid is contributing to
308 M. Nuruzzaman, ‘Neoliberal Economic Reforms, the Rich and the Poor in Bangladesh’, Journal of Contemporary Asia,
vol. 34, no. 1, 2004, pp. 33-35.
309 Parnini, pp. 557-558.
311 Parnini, pp. 557-560.
50
investment but the deficiency within the Bangladesh institutional system function like a vicious cycle
that hinders the effective aid utilisation for making the necessary and planned changes.
Simultaneously, donor-guided reform programs and their aid conditions rarely align with the needs
of the country for Bangladesh to take ownership of the proposed aid reforms and conditions attached.
As aid is essential for meeting the investment gaps, Bangladesh must work on how aid effectiveness
can be ensured. The recent endeavours of the OECD aim to achieve aid effectiveness through
mutual donor-recipient collaboration by removing internal deficiencies and aligning the aid
conditionality with that of the country for the country to take ownership of the aid’s goals and
conditions. The next chapter discusses what Bangladesh has done so far to address the new agenda
for aid effectiveness, what progress it has achieved and what it can further do to ensure aid
effectiveness.
51
CHAPTER 6: AID EFFECTIVENESS – MEASURES AND
ANALYSIS
6.1. Introduction
Most of the recent studies on the aid-growth relationship find a positive impact of aid on the growth
and development of the recipient countries. Simultaneously, these studies consider the impact of aid
on the structural and systematic reforms of the recipient countries. The reform initiatives are
implemented to promote a well-organised management system for the recipient government so that
it can ensure sustainable socioeconomic development through efficient resource allocation and
utilisation thereof.312 A significant portion of aid is utilised in the reform programs alongside the
productive economic and social sectors but aid is frequently criticised for not making a substantial
impact on the reform arrangements.313 Hence, effectiveness in achieving the expected outcomes of
aid utilisation covering growth and reforms is a considerable issue for the donors, recipients, policy
makers, development professionals and academics.314 Until now, I have discussed how, despite
some wastage, aid has made a significant contribution to socioeconomic development in Bangladesh
through capital accumulation and investment. Aid has some positive effects in promoting systematic
reforms of the Government of Bangladesh but the progress is slow due to corruption, institutional
inefficiency, political uncertainty, aid conditionality and a lack of country ownership over the reform
programs. The impediments for aid effectiveness are persistent in almost all the recipient countries.
As donors are also responsible for ensuring aid effectiveness, the OECD has adopted a new set of
guiding principles for aid management and coordination by addressing the roles of both sides.315
This chapter discusses the measures that Bangladesh has taken so far to ensure aid effectiveness
along with their progress. This chapter also includes some policy implications for Bangladesh to
ensure aid effectiveness in the years ahead.
6.2. Progress of Aid Effectiveness Measures

Bangladesh has implemented some of the reform programs related to the macroeconomic
framework, governance, public management and aid management – which have mostly been
prescribed by the donors. However, there are considerable differences in the reform scenario before
and after the Paris Declaration in 2005. The earlier reforms were strictly donor driven where only the
internal factors and the role of the Government of Bangladesh were taken into consideration. 316
Conversely, the modalities of aid effectiveness since the Paris Declaration have strategically focused
312 D.K. Christopoulos, G. Siourounis and I. Vlachaki, ‘Democratic Reforms, Foreign Aid and Production Inefficiency’,
The Manchester School, vol. 84, no. 3, 2016, pp. 366-367.
313 N. Gulrajani, ‘Dilemmas in Donor Design: Organisational Reform and the Future of Foreign Aid Agencies’, Public
Administration and Development, vol. 35, no. 2, 2015, pp. 152-154.

315 J.W. Choi and J. Bak, ‘Governance and Management for Better Aid Effectiveness: A Donor Country’s Perspective’,
International Review of Public Administration, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, pp. 47-48.
316 Dristy, pp. 12-14.
52
on mutual cooperation and accountability of the donors and the Government of Bangladesh.
Therefore, I have discussed the aid effectiveness measures in Bangladesh in two parts; that is,
before and after the Paris Declaration.
6.2.1. Aid effectiveness measures and progress before the Paris Declaration
Bangladesh started receiving aid immediately after independence to deliver humanitarian
assistance. Gradually, Bangladesh began to invest aid in development activities and the
development budget (ADP) became completely dependent on foreign aid from 1974 to the late
1980s. By the end of the 1980s, the flow of aid was around 10% of the GDP and almost 100% of the
ADP.317 At that time, no budget was possible without pledging for aid utilisation at the ‘Paris
Consortium Meetings’318 in April of each year. This aid dependency of Bangladesh had given the
opportunity to the donor to practise unparalleled influence in the reform and formulation of the
country’s policies. Hence, the WB and the IMF imposed the Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs)
on Bangladesh. SAPs were designed to be implemented by the aid recipient to promote a free market
economy in light of the neoliberal economic theories associated with the Washington Consensus.319
The main features of the consensus were broadly related to financial liberalisation, privatisation, tax
reforms, trade openness and removing trade barriers, reduction in public expenditure, decreasing
state interventions in the market and ensuring property rights in the aid recipient countries.320
Bangladesh accepted these reform programs under the SAPs but due to several drawbacks in the
Bangladesh institutional system and the operational modalities of the donors discussed in the
previous chapter, Bangladesh could not implement the programs satisfactorily. The WB and the IMF
overlooked their own drawbacks in the reform agenda and focused only on the weakness of the
Bangladesh institutional system in dealing with the economic policies as the causes behind the
failure of the reform programs.321 They described the numerous operational failures collectively as
the failure of governance. To the WB, the failure of governance in the macroeconomic management
of Bangladesh is related to weaknesses in fiscal management, quality public expenditure, financial
sector reforms, the promotion of the private sector, and the pricing of tradable goods.322 The policy
makers, officials and professionals of Bangladesh identified hard conditions of the reform proposals
and internal political constrictions as well as institutional incompetence as the causal factors behind
the weak outcomes, compared to the actual commitments of the reform programs.323

318 ‘Paris Consortium Meetings’ is referred to the Aid Group’s meeting. It is a consortium of donor countries who met in
Paris till 2001 to pledge resources for the recipient countries for a given period. After 2001, for Bangladesh, this group was
converted into Bangladesh Development Forum (BDF) with similar agenda.
319 Willis, pp. 52-53.
320 J. Williamson, ‘The Strange History of the Washington Consensus’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 27, no.
2, 2004, pp. 195-196.

322 The World Bank (WB) and The Asian Development Bank (ADB), Bangladesh: Economic Trends and the Policy Agenda,
The WB and The ADB, Dhaka, 2008, pp. 10-15,

<http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/691201468768008848/pdf/30617.pdf>, consulted 12 April 2018.
53
The implementation of the SAPs had an inverse impact on the political economy of Bangladesh. The
vested interest groups used their political power and bureaucratic influence to empower and enrich
themselves whereas the masses were deprived of the benefits of the reforms and the financial
incentives from the flow of aid as well.324 The failure of the SAPs was not sufficient for the donors
rethink their reform agenda; rather they continued imposing further reform programs, assuming that
the core problems lied with the governance. Poverty reduction alongside achieving growth was
prioritised by the donors where the new issues like good governance, judicial reforms and democracy
were attributed with the SAPs.325 Eventually, Bangladesh needed to prepare and finalise a Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) covering the new agenda and related issues by 2005. Apart from
this, donors have also emphasised improving institutional competence and effective project
management by duly incorporating accountability, transparency and stakeholders’ participation and
empowerment.326
Still, these reforms could not impact very much on the building of structural capacity in Bangladesh
for aid management. On the one hand, the home-grown impediments and the donor-driven reform
programs, combined with a lack of country ownership on the other, collectively contributed to the
failure of the reform programs. As a result, aid effectiveness was not achieved as per expectations.
These failures in Bangladesh were not unique. As a consequence, the OECD-DAC moved to then
rethink the entire gamut of the aid utilisation modalities and finally came up with a set of aid
effectiveness guidelines for recipient countries through the Paris Declaration in 2005; and these were
reinforced by the Accra Agenda for Action in 2008 and finally again the Busan High Level Forum in
2011.
6.2.2. Aid effectiveness measures and progress after the Paris Declaration
6.2.2.1. The aid effectiveness principles
The international community of more than 150 donor countries/agencies and recipient countries have
endorsed ‘The Paris Declaration’ to mutually launch practical and results-based roadmaps to utilise
aid successfully and assess aid effectiveness progress in the recipient countries.327 The declaration
encompasses five core principles together with 56 partnership commitments among the donors and
recipient countries with a view to enhancing aid effectiveness. The core principles are:328
324 Nuruzzaman, p. 52.

325 Dristy, pp. 12-14.
327 N. Dabelstein and M.Q. Patton, ‘The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: History and Significance’, Canadian Journal
of Program Evaluation, vol. 27, no. 3, 2013, pp. 19-21.

328 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action’,
OECD’s website, Paris, 2018, <http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm>,

consulted 12 April 2018.
54
Ownership: The partnered developing countries shall prioritise their development
requirements, prepare their own policies and strategies for development, and coordinate the
development actions.
Alignment: The donor countries/agencies shall extend development assistance as per the
partner country’s development strategies, institutions and procedures.
Harmonisation: The procedures of the development partners are harmonised, simplified,

transparent and mutually effective to avoid duplication in aid utilisation.
Managing for Results: The donors and recipients shall collectively manage the allocated
resources and the decision makings shall be focused on achieving development results.
Mutual Accountability: The donors and the recipients are mutually accountable for their
actions in achieving development outcomes.
The Accra Agenda for Action was organised in Ghana in 2008 to facilitate in-depth discussion and
negotiation among the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and their donors to fully implement the
principles of the Paris Declaration. A schedule was fixed to achieve the commitments of the Paris
Declaration by 2010.329 Considering the progress of the Paris commitments, the Accra Agenda for
Action emphasises on promoting Country Ownership, Inclusive Partnership, Delivery of Results and
Capacity Enhancing for Development of the recipient countries.330 The Paris and Accra events were
helpful to reshape the conventional donor-driven aid mechanism as a partnership-based approach
for development. The fourth high-level forum on aid effectiveness, held in Busan in 2011, added new
dimensions to the era of development cooperation. Reiterating the Paris and Accra principles, the
forum acknowledged that aid is only an alternative source of development financing and the external
supports alone cannot eradicate poverty and ensure development.331 Rather, a multi-stakeholder
development partnership is crucial for the development of the recipient country where the financial
support and technical know-how of the development partners can be instrumental.332 Hence, the
Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) was created. The GPEDC
emphasises accountability and transparency of the aided efforts through a strong monitoring system
including institutional capacity development, enhancing multi-stakeholder development cooperation
among all the local and global stakeholders, ensuring governance and accountability, and promoting
gender equality. This notion of development cooperation was agreed by the conventional donors,
partners of the South-south Cooperation, BRICs,333 and private investors and so on.
329 Dristy, pp. 12-14.

330 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
331 A. Bigsten and S. Tengstam, ‘International Coordination and the Effectiveness of Aid’, World Development, vol. 69,
2015, pp. 75-78.

333 The four developing countries i.e. Brazil, Russia, India and China are collectively known as BRICs. All the countries are
from Higher Middle Income Country group and lead several regional cooperation and thus influential to the Least
Developed and other developing countries.
55
6.2.2.2. Progress of aid effectiveness measures after the Paris Declaration
The Government of Bangladesh signed the Paris Declaration in 2005 to improve its efficiency in
managing and coordinating the development assistance offered by the multilateral and bilateral
development partners. Bangladesh received almost all its aid in light of the guiding principles of the
Paris Declaration in that period.334 In compliance with the principles, Bangladesh formulated national
strategies and undertook several reform initiatives to perform its part in enhancing country
ownership, alignment with the donors and results-based monitoring and evaluation plans for the
aided projects. These initiatives were helpful in achieving aid effectiveness to some extent in terms
of aid disbursement as per national plans and MDGs, better coordination among the donors and
strengthening of the aid management system in Bangladesh.335
Bangladesh participated in the Accra Agenda for Action in 2008 and declared to form a Joint
Cooperation Strategy (JCS) between the government and the donors. The JCS was made effective
in 2010 as a way to make the Paris Declaration a reality in Bangladesh. It included action plans to
improve the aid transfer mechanism, strengthen the aid management capacity of the government,
improve fiscal management in the public sector, and ensure mutual responsibility for poverty
reduction and the creation of opportunities for the wider community. The JCS is the avenue where
the donors and the government are accountable to each other in respect to the actions taken by both
sides to ensure aid effectiveness.336 One key instrument of the JCS is the BDF which unites the
development institutions of the government, development partners, the Local Consultative Group
(LCG), civil society, NGOs, the media and the private sector together to take part in dialogue and
discussion on the country’s development framework.337 The BDF intends to consult on the country’s
development policies and priorities with a view to adopting the best conceivable approaches to work
collectively. Another component of the JCS is the LCG which aims to coordinate the government-led
and donor-supported development programs with a view to ensuring aid harmonisation.338
Bangladesh also introduced the Harmonised Action Plan (HAP) in 2006 to ensure better coordination
with its partners.
The last OECD evaluation report of 2011 on the progress of the Paris Declaration shows that
Bangladesh only succeeded to achieve three (3, 4 and 8 of table 6.1) out of the 12 indicators under
the five core principles. There was some progress in Ownership, Alignment and Harmonisation up
to 2010 although there were still a lot of challenges for Bangladesh.339 On the contrary, nothing was
achieved in case of results-based frameworks and dimensions of mutual accountability, meaning
Bangladesh needed to face severe challenges as a consequence. Donors’ prolonged disbursement

335 Dristy, pp. 12-14.
336 International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI), ‘Joint Cooperation Strategy of Bangladesh’, IATI’s website, New York,
2010, <https://www.aidtransparency.net/news/joint-cooperation-strategy-of-bangladesh>, consulted 12 April 2018.

337 Dristy, pp. 12-14.
339 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Bangladesh, OECD, Paris, 2011, pp. 1-5,
<https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/Bangladesh%203.pdf>, consulted 13 April 2018.
56
procedures while aid volatility, politicised aid management of the development ministries, political
instability and the absence of all-inclusive capacity improvement procedures were the causes for
slow progress in negotiating the Paris Declaration.340 Despite the slow progress, Bangladesh did not
stop working and continued several approaches to ensure aid effectiveness as per the principles
acknowledged in 2011 in the Busan High Level Forum.
Table 6.1: The progress of aid effectiveness measures in Bangladesh up to 2010.
INDICATORS 2005 2007 2010 ACTUAL 2010 TARGET

REFERENCE
1 Operational development strategies C C C B or A
2a Reliable public financial management (PFM) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5
systems
2b Reliable procurement systems Not available Not available Not available No Target
3 Aid flows are aligned on national 88% 92% 100% 94%
priorities
4 Strengthen capacity by co-ordinated 31% 69% 54% 50%
support
5a Use of country PFM systems 53% 77% 65% No Target
5b Use of country procurement systems 48% 66% 29% No Target
6 Strengthen capacity by avoiding parallel 38 24 18 13
PIUs
7 Aid is more predictable 91% 100% 84% 96%
8 Aid is untied 89% 89% 93% More than 89%
9 Use of common arrangements or 41% 50% 34% 66%
procedures
10a Joint missions 19% 20% 29% 40%
10b Joint country analytic work 38% 42% 47% 66%
11 Results-oriented frameworks D C C B or A
12 Mutual accountability N N N Y
(Source: OECD 2011)
The JCS is still functioning in terms of LCG plenary and BDF meetings and efforts are being
undertaken to work on aid effectiveness. As part of the commitment to the International Aid
Transparency Initiative (IATI), Bangladesh has developed a web-based Aid Information
Management System (AIMS) to promote transparency in aid management and information.341 The
Economic Relations Division (ERD) is the central organisation in Bangladesh for coordinating and
managing development assistance. The ERD, with financial and technical support from the UNDP,
is executing a capacity development project titled ‘Strengthening Capacity for Aid Effectiveness in
Bangladesh’. The core objective of this project is to promote transparency and accountability in the
allocation, coordination, utilisation and management of development assistance.342 The objectives
plan to achieve the strengthening of the country’s aid administration capabilities and systems while
improving collective coordination mechanisms. The outcomes of the project are expected to entail
340 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Bangladesh, pp. 1-5; Dristy, pp. 12-14.
341 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Strengthening Capacity for Aid Effectiveness in Bangladesh: What
is the Project about?’, UNDP’s website, Dhaka, 2018,
<http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/operations/projects/democratic_governance/strengthening-
capacity-for-aid-effectiveness-in-bangladesh.html>, consulted 15 April 2018.
342 United Nations Development Programme, ‘Strengthening Capacity for Aid Effectiveness in Bangladesh’.
57
enhanced development results. The project has been helpful for the government in institutionalising
and instigating aid effectiveness issues both at the local and global level. Bangladesh is a
member of the steering committee of the GPEDC, the Vice Chair of IATI and the Chair of the
Asia Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility (AP-DEF). 343 Bangladesh has already
prepared and adopted a ‘National Policy on Development Cooperation (NPDC)’ with the core
objectives of providing a coherent and integrated institutional and policy approach, ensuring the
alignment of development assistance with national requirements and safeguarding the results of
effective aid utilisation.344 In addition, through the Right to Information Act, the government is making
arrangements to publicly share government documents, aid data and project documents so that the
transparency and accountability of the aided efforts are ensured.345 As part of the functional
Monitoring and Evaluation system for financial management, Bangladesh introduced the Medium-
Term Budgetary Framework (MTBF). It is the key instrument for coordination among the
administrative and regulatory institutions of the government in respect to national planning and fiscal
management. The adoption of the world-accredited Public Procurement Guidelines and e-tendering
as part of efficient public expenditure have added new dimensions to Bangladesh’s efforts for
ensuring aid effectiveness.
Still, the Public Financial Management (PFM) system in Bangladesh is not strong enough mainly
due to the poor coordination of the central ministries with the local government offices at the sub-
national levels.346 Whatever steps on aid effectiveness Bangladesh has taken so far have contributed
to the knowledge and perception level of the ERD but it is not sufficient for ensuring comprehensive
aid effectiveness in Bangladesh. Political interference, corruption, deception and malpractice
discussed in Chapter 5 are all still threats for the public procurement system, which are collectively
responsible for the slow delivery of aid.347 The limited capacity of the development ministries is an
obstacle for designing and implementing quality development projects. Government agencies often
appoint skilled and trained officials to such positions which, unfortunately, are positions not aligned
to their expertise. Consequentially, the government misses the opportunity of developing
specialisations in development management. Moreover, the development ministries are somehow
incapable of managing programs in accordance with the national and sectoral development
strategies.348 Not even consistent data regarding the impact evaluation of the aided projects are
available within the development ministries. Therefore, despite all efforts, Bangladesh is still
expected to achieve set outcomes regarding aid effectiveness. Nonetheless, the aid effectiveness
343 United Nations Development Programme, ‘Strengthening Capacity for Aid Effectiveness in Bangladesh’.
344 Economic Relations Division (ERD), ‘Bangladesh: National Policy on Development Cooperation’, Ministry of Finance,
Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2018,
<http://erd.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/erd.portal.gov.bd/page/9d1a9f30_664e_4ac0_93bf_07163494bdfe/FINAL
%20DRAFT%20NPDC%20(1).pdf>, consulted 16 April 2018.
346 Waheduzzaman and C.H.B. Mphande, ‘Gaps in Pursuing Participatory Good Governance’, Administration and Society,
vol. 46, no. 1, 2014, pp. 53-55.

347 M.H. Khan and R.M. Gisselquist, ‘Aid and Governance in Vulnerable States: Bangladesh and Pakistan since 1971’,
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 656, no. 1, 2014, pp. 74-76.
348 Dristy, pp. 24-26.
58
measures have been reinforced properly since 2008 in light with the Accra agenda and streamlined
since the Busan Forum in 2011; so it appears more time is required to witness substantial progress
in this area in a country like Bangladesh. Interestingly, there is a general perception in Bangladesh
that the aided projects are more transparent and, hence, more successful.349 Bangladesh should
adhere to its missions and carry on the measures with innovation to ensure aid effectiveness.
6.3. Identifying Weaknesses in the Aid Delivery System

Considering the impediments for aid utilisation, the efforts for aid effectiveness and the progress of
effectiveness measures in Bangladesh, I have identified some weaknesses in the foreign aid
management and coordination system. These weaknesses must be removed to ensure a results-
based aid utilisation mechanism in Bangladesh.
Firstly, as argued in sections 3.7, 5.5 and 6.2 of this paper, Bangladesh has not been able to
completely comply with the aid effectiveness measures as per OECD guidelines. Country ownership
over development planning and programs as well as their alignment to the national requirements are
yet to be established as the core principle of the aid effectiveness framework.350 The dependency
attitude of the government and the dominating roles of the development partners impede the
evolution of an effective development partnership in this regard.351 Bangladesh is substantially
dependent on overseas consultants and guidance for generating policies and reform measures that
somehow fails to place the nation’s requirements at its core.352
Secondly, section 6.2 discusses how strengthening of the ERD in terms of knowledge development
is not in itself sufficient to modernise the aid management and coordination system in Bangladesh.
The sectoral planning and the ministries’ undertakings are not sufficiently synchronised with the
national development plans. The ministries are not sufficiently competent in the areas of planning,
execution or budgeting to deliver on the development programs.353 Ministries have a dearth of skilled
and specialised workforces suited to efficient development management.354 The ERD has insufficient
authoritative influence over the development ministries and agencies in monitoring all the phases of
planning, implementation and evaluation of aided development projects.355 As the central
coordinating agency, the ERD has limitations in performing its roles.
349 M.S. Winters, S. Dietrich and M. Mahmud, ‘Perceptions of Foreign Aid Project Quality in Bangladesh’, Research and
Politics, vol. 4, no. 4, 2017, pp. 1-5.
350 Rahaman and Khan, pp. 118-120; Obaydullah, pp. 60-61; Dristy, pp. 24-26.
351 C. Blampied, Where Next for Development Effectiveness? Recommendations to the GPEDC for Nairobi and Beyond,
The Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, 2016, pp. 4-7, <https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-
documents/11089.pdf>, consulted 16 April 2018.
352 M.M. Rahaman and N.A Khan, ‘Making International Aid Effective: An Agenda for Aligning Aid to Social Business’,
Development Policy Review, vol. 35, 2017, pp. 104-105.

353 Winters and Martinez, pp. 520-522.
354 Dristy, pp. 24-26.
355 Rahaman and Khan, ‘The Realities of Aid Harmonisation and Aid Effectiveness’, pp. 118-120.
59
Thirdly, the current aid allocation system is distorted by the communication skills and relationship of
the ministries with the donors (see sections 5.2, 5.3 and 6.2). Aid flow needs to be directed based
on the nation’s actual requirements, tangible and assessable results, and objective assessments but
so far the shadowy requirements have been much influential in attracting aid allocation.356 The ERD
has limitations in playing the role of mediator between the donors and government ministries in this
concern. Again, sections 5.5 and 6.2 argue that the development partners are sometimes strict on
their conditions and have been slow in the financing and disbursement of the committed assistance
for development projects.357 In addition, aid is provided by the donors in a segregated way, where
aid flow is sometimes not harmonised and aligned to the national priorities and development planning
of Bangladesh.
Fourthly, sections 5.5 and 6.2 claim that public expenditure and financial management in Bangladesh
are not transparent or results-oriented.358 Despite taking some initiatives such as e-tendering and
the MTBF, the procurement system is still suffering from corruption and nepotism. In addition, only
two-thirds of the aid flow is reported in the national budget and other reporting on aid utilisation.359
Although AIMS has been launched, there is some confusion on the impact of aid delivery because
both the donors and the ministries are yet to provide the entire updated aid data to the system.
Fifthly, as discussed in section 6.2 above, the GPEDC is focusing on multi-stakeholder partnerships
for development effectiveness. All the stakeholders are expected to appraise each other’s role for
effective aid delivery. However, the platforms at the national level such as the LCG or the BDF meet
approximately once every two or three years. These are functional but irregular and not well-
represented by all the stakeholders, and is not, therefore, adequate to ensure mutual accountability
and a results-based partnership.360
Finally and most importantly, Bangladesh is struggling to ensure development effectiveness

irrespective of domestically or externally financed initiatives, mainly due to lack of political
commitments from the ruling parties (sections 4.4, 5.4, 6.1 and 6.2).361 The politicisation of
government institutions are the root cause for systematic incompetence, corruption, political
interference on public expenditure and political uncertainty.362 This is also responsible for fluctuations
in the donor-recipient relationships in Bangladesh because changes in power entail changes in
international relationships.
356 Rahaman and Khan, ‘The Realities of Aid Harmonisation and Aid Effectiveness’, pp. 111-112; Quibria and Ahmad, pp.
30-31; Obaydullah, pp. 57-58.
357 Blampied, pp. 2-5.
358 Waheduzzaman and Mphande, pp. 53-55; S. Younus, ‘Monetary Transmission Channels in Bangladesh: Evidence from
a Floating Exchange Rate Regime’, Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 51, no. 2, 2017, pp. 255-258.
359 United Nations Development Program, ‘Strengthening Capacity for Aid Effectiveness in Bangladesh’.
360 Rahaman and Khan, ‘The Realities of Aid Harmonisation and Aid Effectiveness’, pp. 113-115; Blampied, pp. 2-5.
361 Osman, pp. 324-325.
362 Ahmed and Pulok, pp. 81-82.
60
6.4. Conclusion
The above aid effectiveness issues have been highlighted since the 1990s in Bangladesh. I classify
the aid effectiveness discussion in Bangladesh into two different eras from the 1990s to 2005 and
from 2005 to present. The aid effectiveness measures before 2005 were essentially donor-driven
reform programs where the WB and the IMF performed the key roles. With the spirit of the
Washington Consensus, Bangladesh had to implement SAPs to reform some of the macroeconomic
policy frameworks. Due to institutional incompetence, corruption, political volatility and lack of
country ownership of the reform programs, Bangladesh could achieve very little from the aid
effectiveness measures before 2005. Since 2005, the OECD through the Paris Declaration, the
Accra Agenda for Action and the Busan High Level Forum have developed new principles of aid
effectiveness. Bangladesh has already implemented and is still planning to implement several
initiatives to ensure aid effectiveness as per OECD guidelines. These guidelines are based on
mutual responsibility between the Government of Bangladesh and its development partners, and
can be, therefore, instrumental for aid effectiveness. Bangladesh has reformed some mechanisms
for better aid coordination and to promote country ownership, alignment, transparency and a results-
based framework for effective aid utilisation as per the national interests. The OECD is working to
develop a multi-stakeholder global partnership for development by ensuring mutual responsibilities
and accountability of all the stakeholders. Bangladesh is still to achieve expected outcomes in aid
effectiveness and must face several challenges in this regard which are mostly associated with
conventional systematic weaknesses. Bangladesh needs to continue its aid effectiveness efforts to
achieve desired success in this area. Nonetheless, some of the initiatives in Bangladesh are very
new and it will take time to evaluate the outcomes of these new principles and measures on aid
effectiveness.
61
CHAPTER 7: THE AID-GROWTH DEBATE IN BANGLADESH: A
REFLECTION
The impact of foreign aid on economic growth and development has been an issue of much
controversy.363 Most of the recent studies on the aid-growth relationship find a positive impact of aid
on economic growth and development in the recipient countries, though the sound macroeconomic
policy framework has been the precondition for aid effectiveness.364 Bangladesh has depended on
foreign aid since its independence in 1971 to meet deficits in development financing. Even though
Bangladesh has been becoming less aid-dependent in terms of the aid-to-GDP ratio, it still mobilises
a substantial portion of its development budget from foreign aid.365 Over time, there have been
several changes in the aid utilisation modalities in Bangladesh. Currently, it mobilises foreign aid
mostly in forms of loan and as project aid, investing that aid in development projects in the productive
public sector.366 Still, the impact of aid utilisation on development is debatable in Bangladesh both
from socioeconomic and institutional perspectives.367 This study is an attempt to weigh the overall
contribution of foreign aid to the socioeconomic and institutional development of Bangladesh. At the
outset of this paper, I discussed the potential of the alternatives to foreign aid for development
financing in Bangladesh. Then I examined the impact of aid in the form of public investment on the
determinants of economic growth and development by classifying them into four categories, with
these being macroeconomic variables, human and social development, institutional capacity
building, and environmental and disaster management. I have compared the impact of aid on these
determinants as found in aid-growth literature with the actual context in Bangladesh by using several
secondary data sources. In addition, I have analysed the impediments for aid utilisation and the
current macroeconomic framework along with its weaknesses for aid effectiveness in Bangladesh.
This study argues that the alternative options for development financing in Bangladesh such as
internal revenue, exports and trade, FDI, domestic public debt, and remittance have significant
potential for public investment. However, due to a lack of appropriate policy environment and efficient
institutional frameworks, these alternatives are not sufficiently feasible to reduce dependency on
foreign aid currently. Therefore, foreign aid is an essential part of development financing in
Bangladesh.368 I have found that investment with aid positively impacts on the macroeconomic
determinants such as macroeconomic conditions, trade, FDI and internal revenue generation,
whereas aid has no considerable relationship with domestic savings. Aid positively influences the
management of some macroeconomic conditions such as the inflation rate, public consumption, the
balance of payments and the level of external debt but aid impacts little on the real exchange rate.
363 Gulrajani, ‘Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate’, pp. 199-200.
364 Gulrajani, ‘Dilemmas in Donor Design’, pp. 152-154.
365 Quibria and Ahmad, pp. 2-7.
366 Economic Relations Division, Flow of External Resources into Bangladesh, pp. 10-15.
367 Hossain, ‘The Effect of Foreign Aid on the Economic Growth of Bangladesh’, pp. 103-104.
368 Hossain, ‘Nexus between Foreign Aid and Economic Growth’, pp. 59-60.
62
Development aid is successful in human and social development approaches and MDG achievement
by promoting education, health, skills development, gender equality, poverty reduction, social
protection and social justice.369 Foreign aid has some positive but slow progress on the capacity
building of the political and administrative institutions of the government. The aided approaches in
Bangladesh are effective for environmental management, mitigation of climate change impacts and
disaster management. Therefore, foreign aid in Bangladesh has a significant positive contribution to
economic growth and development through capital accumulation and public investment in the
macroeconomic sectors, human development and social development approaches, institutional
capacity building programs, and environmental management. Despite noting the positive impact of
aid, the quality implementation of the aided projects and maximising the benefits of aid utilisation in
Bangladesh is hampered by traditional impediments in development discourse.
The internal deficiencies within the Bangladesh institutional system and the donors’ rigid operational
procedures are collectively challenging for aid effectiveness in Bangladesh.370 The political,
economic, administrative, regulatory and legislative authorities in Bangladesh have less capacity to
design, implement and monitor their responsibilities as per expectation. The immature democracy,
corruption, politicisation of civil bureaucracy and political violence and uncertainties are responsible
for the inefficient management system.371 Foreign aid is projected to entail growth and development
accompanied by institutional improvement but the deficiencies within the Bangladesh institutional
system create a vicious cycle that hinders aid effectiveness in making constructive changes.372 The
notion that aid returns can be maximised by removing these impediments puts forward
transformative actions to ensure aid effectiveness on occasion. Before 2005, the aid effectiveness
measures were mostly donor-driven reform programs such as the implementation of SAPs and
PRSPs. These donor-guided reform programs have not been very effective for Bangladesh because
of inflexible aid conditionality, lack of country ownership and deficiencies within the Bangladesh
institutional system.373 The OECD guiding principles commenced from 2005 for aid effectiveness are
focused on a global multi-stakeholder partnership for development effectiveness. The donors are
expected to ensure aid harmonisation and aid alignment to the national priority of Bangladesh,
whereas Bangladesh needs to ensure country ownership over the development discourse.
Bangladesh started executing the OECD aid effectiveness measures in 2005 but could not achieve
notable progress between 2005 and 2010.374 Bangladesh is presently trying to alleviate the aid
effectiveness framework through different policies and programs.
Bangladesh has been working both at the local and global levels to ensure aid effectiveness based
on the global partnership for development effectiveness. At the global level, Bangladesh is actively
369 Mahmud et al., pp. 15-20; The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan, pp. 24-25.
370 Parnini, pp. 557-560.
374 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Bangladesh, pp. 1-5,
63
participating in the OECD platforms such as GPEDC, IATI and so on that are working on the aid
effectiveness across the world. At the national level, it organises several consultation sessions like
the LCG and the BDF to come up with appropriate procedures to ensure aid effectiveness. I argue
that Bangladesh has benefited from aid utilisation and that the Government of Bangladesh has
demonstrated its willingness to work on aid effectiveness to maximise the benefits of aid.375 It has
launched some reform and capacity-building programs, and policies to reshape the aid coordination
and management system. However, it is still struggling to make these efforts fully effective because
it is difficult to remove the challenges and impediments of aid utilisation that have accumulated over
the years in Bangladesh. From a self-reliant economy perspective, it would have been better for
Bangladesh if it could increase its domestic revenue generation and export earnings to meet the
deficit budget and gradually decrease its dependence on external debt such as foreign aid. 376
However, considering the huge development requirements on the one hand and the limitations of
the alternative sources for financing on the other, it is assumed that Bangladesh needs to mobilise
foreign aid in the upcoming years too.377 Nonetheless, some more issues such as the changing
modalities in aid utilisation in the Post-Aid world after the Busan High Level Forum for development
effectiveness, the projected role of aid in achieving SDGs for Bangladesh and the potential of the
South-South and Triangular cooperation can be explored through further research. The government
and the development partners should jointly concentrate on how aid effectiveness can better be
ensured and how the benefits of aid utilisation can be maximised.
The donors need to engage in a development partnership, align their aid flow with the national
requirements of Bangladesh, promote aid harmonisation among themselves and ensure mutual
accountability in the development partnership.378 Donors should consider aid as a financing
alternative, allow the Government of Bangladesh to invest the aid money on its own and perform the
roles of the development partners. The Government of Bangladesh must be given the driving seat
to steer its own development paradigm.
Bangladesh needs to formulate all policies and programs based on its own procedural necessities
and actual national requirements. It must have full ownership over the reform measures for aid
management and coordination. Bangladesh should design its development projects considering its
actual needs as well as the socioeconomic and political context, not based on the availability of aid
flow.379 It needs to pursue and negotiate with the development partners to align and harmonise aid
flow with the national interests. The institutional competence in terms of planning, implementation
and monitoring of development projects needs to be strengthened at the development ministry level.
As the central aid coordination and management agency, the ERD must be given appropriate
376 Sahoo and Dash, pp. 388-390; Islam, ‘Foreign Assistance and Development in Bangladesh’, pp. 228-229.
378 Blampied, pp. 2-5.
379 Quibria and Ahmad, pp. 30-31.
64
regulatory authority to oversee the pros and cons of the aided development projects.380 The ERD
also should play a more proactive role in maintaining functional communication both at the global
and local level to ensure mutual accountability. In addition, political commitments, a results-based
framework, transparency and accountability, and stakeholders’ empowerment are also the
prerequisites for the government to ensure aid effectiveness. Though foreign aid has had noted a
positive impact on the socioeconomic development of Bangladesh so far, it cannot enjoy the
maximum benefits of aid unless it successfully meets the necessary requirements of aid
effectiveness. Bangladesh has already started implementing several capacity-building programs to
promote country ownership over the development discourse, transparency and mutual
accountability, institutional improvement, public fiscal management and results-based framework.381
These approaches have mostly been launched after the Busan High Level Forum and are, thus,
relatively new. These measures must face the conventional systematic impediments and
Bangladesh has far to go to make foreign aid fully effective and maximise its benefits from aid.
Assessing the contribution of aid to economic growth and development in Bangladesh is an ongoing
process. There is much more to investigate and to know about aid effectiveness in Bangladesh. This
study can be useful in opening the doors for further research on the aid-growth debate in
Bangladesh.
380 Rahaman and Khan, ‘The Realities of Aid Harmonisation and Aid Effectiveness’, pp. 118-120.
381 Dristy, pp. 24-26.
65
APPENDIX
Appendix 1: Socioeconomic and Political Statistics of Bangladesh

General Geographical Location/Characteristics
Official Name : The People’s Republic of Bangladesh
Location : 200 34' & 260 38' North Latitude
880 01' & 920 41' East Longitude
Continent : Asia
Sub-continent : South Asia
Area (Sq. Km) : 147,570
Boundary : North: India
West: India
South: Bay of Bengal
East: India and Myanmar
Standard Time : GMT+6 Hours
Major Religion : Islam (88%), Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity and Tribal Beliefs.
State Language : Bangla.
Capital : Dhaka
Nationality : Bangladeshi
Currency : Taka (TK/BDT)
Government and Administration

Government : Republic, Parliamentary system, Unitary state, Parliamentary republic
Formation : 17 April 1971 (1st Government)
Parliament : Jatiya Sangsad
General Elections : 10th (January 2014), 9th (December 2008)
Ruling Party : Bangladesh Awami League (from 29 December 2008)
Other major political parties : Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), Jatiya Party (JP).
Administrative Units
Central : 58 Ministries,
Local : 8 Divisions, 64 Districts.
Population Statistics
Population (In Million) Crude Birth Rate (Per 1000 Population), 2015 : 18.8
Population Census 2001 : 130.0 Crude Death Rate (Per 1000 Population), 2015 : 5.1
Population Census 2011 : 151.7 Infant Mortality Rate (Per Thousand Live Birth), : 29
2015 (Estimated) : 158.9 (Below 1 Year of Age), 2015
Population Growth Rate (Percentage), 2015 : 1.37 Total Fertility Rate Per Women (15-49), 2015 : 2.10
Male-Female Ratio, 2015 : 100.3 Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (%), 2015 : 62.1
Population Density/Sq. Km., 2015 : 1077 Mean Age (yrs.) at First Marriage, 2015
Life Expectancy (yrs.), : 2015 Male : 25.3
Both Sex : 70.9 Female : 18.4
Male : 69.4
Female : 72.0
66
Health, Social Services and Education
Persons Per Bed in Govt. Hospitals, : 1,652 Literacy Rate of Population 7 +yrs. (%), 2015 : 63.6
2013-14
Male : 65.6
Persons Per Registered Physician, : 2,039
Female : 61.6
2014
Improved Drinking Water Coverage (%), : 97.9
2015 (tube-well)
Improved Sanitation facility (%), 2015 : 73.5
Rate (%) of Poverty Based on Report on Household Income & Expenditure Survey (HIES)- 2016
[Based on Cost of Basic Needs (CBN) Method]
Using upper poverty line Using lower Poverty line
National : 24.3 National : 12.9
Rural : 26.4 Rural : 14.9
Urban : 18.9 Urban : 7.6
Human Development Index of Bangladesh

Year Life Expected Mean GNI per HDI value HDI Position
expectancy years of years of capita (World)
at birth schooling schooling (2011 PPP$)
1990 58.4 5.7 2.8 1286 0.386 122
1995 61.9 6.6 3.3 1435 0.423 120
2000 65.3 7.5 4.1 1679 0.468 126
2005 68.0 8.4 4.5 2036 0.506 133
2010 70.1 9.4 4.9 2652 0.545 143
2011 70.5 9.9 5.1 2784 0.557 141
2012 70.8 10.0 5.2 2943 0.565 143
2013 71.2 10.0 5.2 3071 0.570 142
2014 71.6 10.2 5.2 3179 0.575 142
2015 72.0 10.2 5.2 3341 0.579 139
Labour Force and Employment

Labour Force Survey, 2015-16
Total Labour Force (15 +yrs.), (million) : 6.21 Percentage of Total Labour Force by Broad Sectors
Male : 4.31 Agriculture Sector : 42.7
Female : 1.91 Non Agriculture Sector : 57.3
Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) : 4.427 (The World Bank 2015)
Statistics on Financial Institutions (June, 2017)

Financial Institutions Capital Markets (Share Price Index)
Total Number of Commercial Banks : 57 Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) : 5656
Broad Index (Base=100)
State Owned Bank :6
Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) : 15580
Specialised Bank :2
(Base=1000)
Local Private Bank : 40
Foreign Bank :9
Non-Bank Financial Institution : 34
Sources:
Bangladesh Bank (2018), Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2017), Finance Division (2017), The World Bank (2018) and
United Nations Development Programme (2016).
67
Appendix 2: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators
(Amounts in US$ billion)
Indicator Figures/Amounts % of GDP
2007-08 2011-12 2015-16 2007-08 2011-12 2015-16
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - - -
At current price 91.64 133.40 221.42 - - -
At constant price 79.80 87.04 112.89 - - -
Growth rate of GDP at constant price (%) 6.01 6.52 7.11 - - -
Per capita GDP(US$) at current price 559 880 1385 - - -
Population (million) 142.4 151.6 159.9 - - -
Consumption
Total 74.06 105.09 166.12 80.8 78.8 75.0
Public 4.74 6.723 13.05 5.2 5.0 5.9
Private 69.32 98.365 153.07 75.6 73.7 69.1
Savings
Domestic 17.64 28.31 55.31 19.3 21.2 25.0
National 25.52 39.83 68.13 27.9 29.9 30.8
Investment
Total 24.01 37.70 65.66 26.2 28.3 29.7
Public 4.12 7.69 15.76 4.5 5.8 6.7
Private 19.89 30.01 50.90 21.7 22.5 23.0
Total Revenue 8.83 14.4 21.9 9.6 10.9 10.2
Tax Revenue 7.00 12.04 19.40 7.6 9.1 9.0
Total Expenditure 13.65 19.07 29.13 14.9 15.3 15.3
Revenue Expenditure 10.37 14.11 20.41 11.3 11.4 10.0
Development Expenditure 3.28 4.96 8.72 3.6 3.9 5.3
Budget Balance -4.82 -5.86 -11.13 -5.3 -4.4 -5.0
Financing 4.82 5.86 11.13 5.3 4.4 5.0
Net Foreign Finance 1.29 1.50 3.19 1.4 1.1 1.4
Domestic Financing 3.53 4.36 7.94 3.9 3.3 3.6
Aid Disbursement 2.06 2.12 3.54 2.2 1.6 1.6
Outstanding External Debt 21.29 23.54 29.19 23.2 17.7 13.2
Imports 21.63 35.52 42.92 23.6 26.6 19.4
Exports 14.11 24.30 34.26 15.4 18.2 15.5
Trade Balance -7.52 -11.22 -8.66 -8.2 -8.4 -3.9
Current Account Balance 0.68 -0.44 47.35 0.7 -0.3 21.4
Foreign Exchange Reserve 6.15 10.36 30.18 6.7 7.8 13.6
Net Foreign assets 5.51 9.96 29.79 6.0 7.5 13.5
Broad Money Supply 36.27 65.37 117.1 39.6 49.0 52.9
Inflation (%) 12.3 8.69 5.9 - -
Remittance 7.92 12.73 14.72 8.6 9.5 6.6
BDT Exchange Rate per US$ 68.60 79.10 78.26 - -
Sources:
Bangladesh Bank (2018), Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2017), Economic Relations Division (2016) and Finance
Division (2017).
68
Appendix 3: Sectoral Share of GDP (%) and Growth Rate at Constant
Prices (Base Year: FY 2005-06)
Sectoral Share of GDP (%) Growth Rate
Sector 2007-08 2011-12 2015-16 2007-08 2011-12 2015-16
Agriculture and Forestry 14.89 13.70 11.70 3.87 2.41 1.79
Fishing 3.79 3.68 3.65 7.00 5.32 6.11

Mining and Quarrying 1.54 1.61 1.77 7.67 6.93 12.84
Manufacturing 16.88 18.28 21.01 7.33 9.96 11.69
Electricity, Gas and Water Supply 1.21 1.41 1.50 7.75 10.58 13.33
Construction 6.50 6.78 7.26 5.99 8.42 8.56
Wholesale and Retail Trade 13.96 14.02 13.98 7.27 6.70 6.50
Hotel and Restaurants 0.74 0.74 0.75 5.69 6.39 6.98

Transport, Storage and Communication 10.61 11.49 11.31 8.26 9.15 6.08
Financial Intermediations 3.03 3.21 3.39 3.92 14.76 7.74

Real Estate, Renting and Business Activities 7.87 7.22 6.64 3.79 3.92 4.47
Public Administration and Defense 3.14 3.35 3.63 6.51 7.53 11.43
Education 2.24 2.23 2.39 7.14 7.75 11.71

Health and Social Works 1.99 1.90 1.84 5.87 3.81 7.54
Community, Social and Personal Services 11.61 10.38 9.18 3.19 3.25 3.30
GDP and Growth Rate 100.00 100.00 100.00 6.01 6.52 7.11
Sources:
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2017) and Finance Division (2017).
69
Appendix 4: Value of Exports and Imports by Major Commodities
Exports: (Amounts showed in US$ million)
Commodity 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
a) Primary Commodities
1. Raw jute 165 148 196 357 266 230 126 112 173
2. Tea 15 12 6 3 3 2 4 3 2
3. Frozen food 534 455 445 625 598 544 638 568 536
4. Agricultural products 120 147 184 262 304 351 402 339 308
5. Other primary commodities 154 108 53 69 96 183 209 244 286
Total Primary Commodities (1-5) 988 870 884 1316 1267 1310 1379 1266 1305
b) Manufactured Goods
6. Jute goods 318 269 540 758 701 801 699 757 747
7. Leather 284 177 226 298 330 400 506 398 278
8. Naphtha, furnace oil and bitumen 185 142 301 261 275 314 162 78 297
9. Readymade garments 5167 5919 6013 8432 9603 11040 12442 13065 14739
10. Knitwear 5533 6429 6483 9482 9486 10476 12050 12427 13355
11. Chemical products 216 280 103 105 103 93 93 112 124
12. Shoe 170 187 204 298 336 419 172 189 219
13. Handicrafts 5 6 4 4 5 6 8 9 10
14. Engineering products 220 189 311 310 376 368 367 447 510
15. Other mfg. products 1025 1096 1135 1664 1820 1800 2309 2461 2673
Total Manufactured Goods (6-15) 13123 14695 15321 21612 23035 25717 28808 29943 32952
Grand Total (a+b) 14111 15565 16205 22928 24302 27027 30187 31209 34257
Annual change (%) 15.87 10.31 4.11 41.49 5.99 11.21 11.69 3.39 9.77
Imports (Amounts showed in US$ million)
Commodity 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
a) Major primary goods 3455 2916 2940 5626 4148 4075 5349 4477 4206
Rice 874 239 75 830 288 30 348 508 112
Wheat 537 643 761 1081 613 696 1126 983 945
Oilseeds 136 159 130 103 177 242 524 374 532
Crude petroleum 695 584 535 923 987 1102 929 316 384
Raw cotton 1213 1291 1439 2689 2083 2005 2422 2296 2233
b) Major intermediate goods 4844 5035 4957 7511 9263 8529 9475 7906 8506
Edible oil 1006 865 1050 1067 1644 1402 1766 924 1436
Petroleum products 2058 1997 2021 3186 3922 3642 4070 2076 2256
Fertilizer 632 955 717 1241 1381 1188 1026 1339 1112
Clinker 347 314 333 446 504 487 615 638 571
Staple fiber 110 112 118 180 428 454 492 1078 1172
Yarn 691 792 718 1391 1384 1356 1506 1851 1959
c) Capital machinery 1664 1420 1595 2325 2005 1835 2288 3321 3399
d) Other goods 11666 13136 14246 18196 20099 19645 23563 25000 26810
Total imports (a+b+c+d) 21629 22507 23738 33658 35516 34084 40675 40704 42921
Annual change (%) 26.1 4.1 5.5 41.8 5.5 -4.0 19.3 0.1 5.4
Source:
Bangladesh Bank (2018) and Finance Division (2017).
70
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Addison, T. and Tarp, F., ‘Aid Policy and the Macroeconomic Management of Aid’, World
Addison, T., Niño-Zarazúa, M. and Tarp, F., ‘Aid, Social Policy and Development’, Journal of
International Development, vol. 27, no. 8, 2015, pp. 1351-1365.
Aghion, P., Comin, D., Howitt, P. and Tecu, I., ‘When Does Domestic Savings Matter for Economic
Growth?’, IMF Economic Review, vol. 64, no. 3, 2016, pp. 381-407.
Ahmad, A., ‘Bangladesh in 2012: Economic Growth, Political Under-development’, Asian Survey,
vol. 53, no. 1, 2013, pp. 73-83.
Ahmed, M.U. and Pulok, M.H., ‘The Role of Political Stability on Economic Performance: The Case
of Bangladesh’, Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, vol. 34, no. 3, 2013, pp. 61-
100.
Ahmed, M.U., Muzib, M.M. and Hasan, M.M., ‘Inflation, Inflation Uncertainty and Relative Price
Variability in Bangladesh’, Eurasian Economic Review, vol. 6, no. 3, 2016, pp. 389-427.
Alam, G.M., ‘The Role of Technical and Vocational Education in the National Development of
Bangladesh’, Asia‐Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, pp. 25-44.
Alam, Q. and Teicher, J., ‘The State of Governance in Bangladesh: The Capture of State Institutions’,
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, vol. 35, no. 4, 2012, pp. 858-884.
Amin, S.B. and Murshed, M., ‘An Empirical Investigation of Foreign Aid and Dutch Disease in
Bangladesh’, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 52, no. 2, 2018, pp. 169-182.
Arndt, C. and Tarp, F., ‘Aid, Environment and Climate Change’, Review of Development
Arndt, C., Jones, S. and Tarp. F., ‘Assessing Foreign Aid’s Long-Run Contribution to Growth and
Development’, World Development, vol. 69, 2015, pp. 6-18.
Arndt, C., Jones, S. and Tarp, F., ‘What Is the Aggregate Economic Rate of Return to Foreign Aid?’,
The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 30, no. 3, 2016, pp. 446-474.
Askarov, Z. and Doucouliagos, H., ‘Spatial Aid Spillovers during Transition’, European Journal of
Political Economy, vol. 40, 2015, pp. 79-95.
Asrafuzzaman, Roy, A. and Gupta, S.D., ‘An Empirical Investigation of Budget and Trade Deficits:
The Case of Bangladesh’, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 3, no. 3,
2013, pp. 570-579.
Ayers, J.M., Huq, S., Faisal, A.M. and Hussain, S.T., ‘Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation
into Development: A Case Study of Bangladesh’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,
vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, pp. 37-51.
Bangladesh Bank, ‘Bangladesh Bank Open Data Initiative’, Bangladesh Bank’s website,
Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2018, <https://www.bb.org.bd/econdata/index.php>, consulted
15 March 2018.
Bangladesh Bank, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Bangladesh, Government of Bangladesh,

Dhaka, 2017, <https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/halfyearly/fdisurvey/fdisurveyjanjun2016.pdf>, consulted
15 March 2018.
71
Bangladesh Bank, ‘Wage Earners Remittance Inflows’, Bangladesh Bank’s website, Government of
Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2018, <https://www.bb.org.bd/econdata/wagermidtl.php>, consulted 18 March
2018.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistical Pocketbook Bangladesh 2016, Ministry of Planning,

Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2017,
<http://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/d6556cd1_dc6f_41f5_a766
_042b69cb1687/PocketBook2016.pdf>, consulted 13 April 2018.
Bearce, D.H., ‘Reconsidering the Effect of Political Regime Type on Foreign Aid Effectiveness’,
International Interactions, vol. 39, no. 3, 2013, pp. 416-424.
Berlinschi, R., ‘Reputation Concerns in Aid Conditionality’, The Review of International Organization,
vol. 5, no. 4, 2010, pp. 433-459.
Bhattacharjee, J. and Haldar, S.K., ‘Economic Growth in South Asia: Binding Constraints for the
Future’, Journal of South Asian Development, vol. 10, no. 2, 2015, pp. 230-249.
Bhavan, T., ‘Effectiveness of Foreign Aid in Facilitating Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from
Four South Asian Countries’, Asian Economic and Financial Review, vol. 4, no. 12, 2014, pp. 1770-
1783.
Bhuiyan, S.H., ‘Modernizing Bangladesh Public Administration through E-governance: Benefits and
Challenges’, Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, 2011, pp. 54-65.
Bigsten, A. and Tengstam, S., ‘International Coordination and the Effectiveness of Aid’, World
Blampied, C., Where Next for Development Effectiveness? Recommendations to the GPEDC for
Nairobi and Beyond, The Overseas Development Institute (ODI), London, 2016,
<https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/11089.pdf>, consulted 16 April
2018.
Bourguignon, F. and Sandburg, M., ‘Aid Effectiveness - Opening the Black Box’, American Economic
Review, vol. 97, no. 2, 2007, pp. 316-321.
Bua, G., Pradelli, J. and Presbitero, A.F., ‘Domestic Public Debt in Low-Income Countries: Trends
and Structure’, Review of Development Finance, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1-19.
Bull, B. and Bøås, M., ‘Between Ruptures and Continuity: Modernisation, Dependency and the
Evolution of Development Theory’, Forum for Development Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, 2012, pp. 319-
336.
Burnside, C. and Dollar, D., ‘Aid, Policies, and Growth’, The American Economic Review, vol. 90,
no. 4, 2000, pp. 847-868.
Busse, M., Hoekstra, R. and Königer, J., ‘The Impact of Aid for Trade Facilitation on the Costs of
Trading’, Kyklos, vol. 65, no. 2, 2012, pp. 143-163.
Byron, S., ‘Examining Foreign Aid Fungibility in Small Open Economies’, Open Economies Review,
vol. 23, no. 4, 2012, pp. 675-712.
Chao, C., Hu, S., Lai, C. and Tai, M., ‘Foreign Aid, Government Spending, and the
Environment’, Review of Development Economics, vol. 16, no. 1, 2012, pp. 62-71.
Choi, J.W. and Bak, J., ‘Governance and Management for Better Aid Effectiveness: A Donor
Country’s Perspective’, International Review of Public Administration, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, pp. 45-
59.
72
Christopoulos, D.K., Siourounis, G. and Vlachaki, I., ‘Democratic Reforms, Foreign Aid and
Production Inefficiency’, The Manchester School, vol. 84, no. 3, 2016, pp. 363-389.
Clemens, M.A., Radelet, S., Bhavnani, R.R. and Bazzi, S., ‘Counting Chickens When They Hatch:
Timing and The Effects of Aid on Growth’, The Economic Journal, vol. 122, no. 561, 2012, pp. 590-
617.
Clist, P., ‘Foreign Aid and Domestic Taxation: Multiple Sources, One Conclusion’, Development
Policy Review, vol. 34, no. 3, 2016, pp. 365-383.
Collier, P., ‘Aid ‘Dependency’: A Critique’, Journal of African Economics, vol. 8, no. 4, 1999, pp. 528-
545.
Dabelstein, N. and Patton, M.Q., ‘The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness: History and
Significance’, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, vol. 27, no. 3, 2013, pp. 19-36.
Davies, J.S., ‘Against Partnership: Toward a Local Challenge to Global Neoliberalism’ in R.

Hambleton and J.S. Gross (eds.), Governing Cities in a Global Era, Palgrave Macmillan, New
York, 2007, pp. 199-210.
Dietrich, S., ‘Donor Political Economies and the Pursuit of Aid Effectiveness’, International
Organization, vol. 70, no. 1, 2016, pp. 65-102.
Dion, M. and Parlinggoman, J., ‘The Role of High-Tech Exports and of Foreign Direct Investments
(FDI) on Economic Growth’, European Research Studies, vol. 20, no. 4A, 2017, pp. 194-212.
Djankov, S., Garcia-Montalvo, J. and Reynal-Querol, M., ‘Does Foreign Aid Help?’, The Cato
Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-28.
Doucouliagos, H. and Paldam, M., ‘Aid Effectiveness on Growth: A Meta Study’, European Journal
of Political Economy, vol. 24, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1-24.
Dristy, N.T., The Macroeconomic Impact of Foreign Aid in Bangladesh Before and After the Paris
Declaration, Bangladesh Development Research Working Paper Series (BDRWPS)-32, Bangladesh
Development Research Center (BDRC), Dhaka, 2016,
<http://www.bangladeshstudies.org/files/WPS_no32.pdf>, consulted 20 March 2018.
Dutta, N., Mukherjee, D. and Roy, S., ‘Re-examining the Relationship between Domestic Investment
and Foreign Aid: Does Political Stability Matter?’, International Review of Applied Economics, vol.
29, no. 3, 2015, pp. 259-286.
Easterly, W., ‘Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth?’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 17, no. 3,
2003, pp. 23-48.
Economic Relations Division (ERD), ‘Bangladesh: National Policy on Development Cooperation’,

Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2018,
<http://erd.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/erd.portal.gov.bd/page/9d1a9f30_664e_4ac0_93bf_
07163494bdfe/FINAL%20DRAFT%20NPDC%20(1).pdf>, consulted 16 April 2018.
Economic Relations Division (ERD), Flow of External Resources into Bangladesh (As of 30 June
2016), Ministry of Finance, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2016.
Edwards, S., ‘Economic Development and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid: A Historical
Perspective’, Kyklos, vol. 68, no. 3, 2015, pp. 277-316.
Fasanya, I.O. and Onakoya, A.B., ‘Does Foreign Aid Accelerate Economic Growth? An Empirical
Analysis for Nigeria’, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 2, no. 4, 2012,
pp. 423-431.
73
Fatima, Q. and Imran, K., ‘Political Development and Modernisation in Bangladesh’, South Asian
Studies, vol. 32, no. 1, 2017, pp. 109-125.
Feeny, S. and Fry, T.R.L., ‘How Sustainable is the Macroeconomic Impact of Foreign Aid?’, Journal
of Policy Modeling, vol. 36, no. 6, 2014, pp. 1066-1081.
Finance Division, Bangladesh Economic Review 2017, Ministry of Finance, Government of

Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2017,
<http://www.mof.gov.bd/site/page/44e399b3-d378-41aa-86ff-
8c4277eb0990/BangladeshEconomicReview>, consulted 12 April 2018.
Glennie, J. and Sumner, A., Aid, Growth and Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2016.
Gocer, I., Akin T. and Alatas, S., ‘The Effects of Saving-Investment Gap on Economic Growth in
Developing Countries: A Clustering and Panel Data Analysis’, Theoretical and Applied Economics,
vol. 23, no. 2, 2016, pp. 157-172.
Griffin, K.B. and Enos, J.L., ‘Foreign Assistance: Objectives and Consequences’, Economic
Development and Cultural Change, vol. 18, no. 3, 1970, pp. 313-327.
Gulrajani, N., ‘Dilemmas in Donor Design: Organisational Reform and the Future of Foreign Aid
Agencies’, Public Administration and Development, vol. 35, no. 2, 2015, pp. 152-164.
Gulrajani, N., ‘Transcending the Great Foreign Aid Debate: Managerialism, Radicalism and the
Search for Aid Effectiveness’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 2, 2011, pp. 199-216.
Gyimah‐Brempong, K., Racine, J.S. and Gyapong, A., ‘Aid and Economic Growth: Sensitivity
Analysis’, Journal of International Development, vol. 24, no. 1, 2012, pp. 17-33.
Hansen, H. and Tarp, F., ‘Aid and Growth Regressions’, Journal of Development Economics, vol.
64, no. 2, 2001, pp. 547-570.
Hansen, H. and Tarp, F., ‘Aid Effectiveness Disputed’, Journal of International Development, vol. 12,
no. 3, 2000, pp. 375-398.
Haque, U., Hashizume, M., Kolivras, K.N., Overgaard, H.J., Das, B. and Yamamotoa, T., ‘Reduced
Death Rates from Cyclones in Bangladesh: What More Needs to Be Done?’, Bulletin of the World
Health Organization, vol. 90, no. 2, 2012, pp. 150-156.
Hasanuzzaman, ‘Assessing the Aid for Trade (AFT) Agenda: Bangladesh Case Study’, Asia-Pacific
Business Review, vol. 6, no. 2, 2010, pp. 5-14.
Hassan, M. and Nazneen, S., ‘Violence and the Breakdown of the Political Settlement: An Uncertain
Future for Bangladesh?’, Conflict, Security and Development, vol. 17, no. 3, 2017, pp. 205-223.
Hassan, M. and Prichard, W., ‘The Political Economy of Domestic Tax Reform in Bangladesh:
Political Settlements, Informal Institutions and the Negotiation of Reform’, The Journal of
Development Studies, vol. 52, no. 12, 2016, pp. 1704-1721.
Hayman, R., ‘Budget Support and Democracy: A Twist in the Conditionality Tale’, Third World
Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, 2011, pp. 673-688.
Hoque, M.M. and Yusop, Z., ‘Impacts of Trade Liberalization on Export Performance in Bangladesh:
An Empirical Investigation’, South Asia Economic Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, 2012, pp. 207-239.
Hossain, A.A., ‘Inflation Volatility, Economic Growth and Monetary Policy in Bangladesh’, Applied
74
Hossain, A.K.M.N. and Hasanuzzaman, S., ‘Remittances and Investment Nexus in Bangladesh: An
ARDL Bounds Testing Approach’, International Review of Economics, vol. 60, no. 4, 2013, pp. 387-
407.
Hossain, B., ‘Nexus between Foreign Aid and Economic Growth: Evidences from Bangladesh’,
Global Journal of Management and Business Research, vol. 14, no. 6, 2014, pp. 59-66.
Hossain, B., ‘The Effect of Foreign Aid on the Economic Growth of Bangladesh’, Journal of
Economics and Development Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, 2014, pp. 93-105.
Hossain, D., ‘Differential Impacts of Foreign Capital and Remittance Inflows on Domestic Savings in
Developing Countries: A Dynamic Heterogeneous Panel Analysis’, Economic Record, vol. 90, 2014,
pp. 102-126.
In’airat, M., ‘Aid Allocation, Selectivity, and the Quality of Governance’, Journal of Economics,
Finance and Administrative Science, vol. 19, no. 36, 2014, pp. 63-68.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ‘Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and
Vulnerability’, IPCC’s website, Geneva, 2016,
<http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=41>, consulted 2 April 2018.
International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI), ‘Joint Cooperation Strategy of Bangladesh’, IATI’s
website, New York, 2010,
<https://www.aidtransparency.net/news/joint-cooperation-strategy-of-bangladesh>, consulted 12
April 2018.
International Monetary Fund (IMF), Bangladesh: Staff Report for the 2017 Article IV Consultation-
Debt Sustainability Analysis, IMF, Dhaka, 2017,
<https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/dsa/pdf/2017/dsacr17147.pdf>, consulted 18 March 2018.
Islam, A.M., ‘Foreign Assistance and Development in Bangladesh’ in K.L. Gupta (ed.), Foreign Aid:
New Perspectives, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York, 1999, pp. 211-231.
Islam, K.M.A., ‘Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Bangladesh: Prospects and Challenges and Its
Impact on Economy’, Asian Business Review, vol. 4, no. 1, 2014, pp. 24-36.
Istiak, K.M., ‘Foreign Aid to Bangladesh: Some Iconoclastic Issues’, The Journal of Developing
Areas, vol. 46, no. 1, 2012, pp. 331-343.
Karim, M.M., ‘Socio-economic and Political Development of South Asian Countries: In Bangladesh
Perspective’, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, vol. 2, no. 2, 2013,
pp. 29-43.
Khan, M.H. and Gisselquist, R.M., ‘Aid and Governance in Vulnerable States: Bangladesh and
Pakistan since 1971’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 656,
no. 1, 2014, pp. 59-78.
Khan, M.M. and Islam, M.S., ‘Public Sector Leadership Development in Bangladesh: Present State
and Future Prospect’, The International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, vol. 10, no. 1,
2014, pp. 17-30.
Khan, M.W.R. and Ahmed, H.A., ‘Dynamics of Foreign Earnings, Assistance and Debt Servicing in
Bangladesh’, International Journal of Development Issues, vol. 11, no. 1, 2012, pp. 74-84.
Kim, E. and Lee, J., ‘Busan and Beyond: South Korea and the Transition from Aid Effectiveness to
Development Effectiveness’, Journal of International Development, vol. 25, no. 6, 2013, pp. 787-
801.
75
Koehler, G., ‘Some Preliminary Reflections on Development, Public Policy and Welfare States’ in G.
Koehler and D. Chopra (eds.), Development and Welfare Policy in South Asia, Routledge, New York,
2014, pp. 9-24.
Kousar, S. and Masood, S., ‘Factors Promoting Foreign Aid Dependence in South Asian Countries’,
South Asian Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, 2017, pp. 181-195.
Lancaster, C., Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics, University of Chicago Press,
Chicago and London, 2008.
Mahmud, M., Otsuka, K., Sawada, Y. and Yamada, E., ‘Development Transformation in Bangladesh:
An Overview’ in Y. Sawada, M. Mahmud and N. Kitano (eds.), Economic and Social Development
of Bangladesh: Miracle and Challenges, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018, pp. 3-26.
Mahmud, W., ‘Social Development in Bangladesh: Pathways, Surprises and Challenges’, Indian
Journal of Human Development, vol. 2, no. 1, 2008, pp. 79-92.
Majumder, M.A., Does Public Borrowing Crowd-out Private Investment? The Bangladesh Evidence,
Working Paper Series: WP 0708, Bangladesh Bank, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2007,
<http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PSGLP/Resources/WP0708Final.pdf>, consulted 18 March
2018.
Makki, S.S. and Somwaru, A., ‘Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade on Economic Growth:
Evidence from Developing Countries’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 86, no. 3,
2004, pp. 795-801.
Manzoor, S.H. and Chowdhury, M.E., ‘Foreign Direct Investments in Bangladesh: Some Recent
Trends and Implications’, Journal of Business and Economics Research, vol. 15, no. 1, 2017, pp.
21-32.
Mashreque, M.S., ‘Politics of Rural Development in Bangladesh: Manipulation, Criminalization and

Corruption’, Himalayan and Central Asian Studies, vol. 19, no. 1/2, 2015, pp. 7-24.
Mawdsley, E., Savage, L. and Kim, S.M., ‘A ‘Post-Aid World’? Paradigm Shift in Foreign Aid and
Development Cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum’, The Geographical Journal, vol.
180, no. 1, 2014, pp. 27-38.
Mekasha, T.J. and Tarp, F., ‘Aid and Growth: What Meta-Analysis Reveals’, Journal of Development
Studies, vol. 49, no. 4, 2013, pp. 564-583.
Molenaers, N., Dellepiane, S. and Faust, J., ‘Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid’, World
Molenaers, N., ‘The Great Divide? Donor Perceptions of Budget Support, Eligibility and Policy
Dialogue’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 5, 2012, pp. 791-806.
Mollah, M.A.H, ‘Growth and Development of Civil Service and Bureaucracy in Bangladesh: An
Overview’, South Asian Survey, vol. 18, no. 1, 2011, pp. 137-156.
Moreira, S.B., ‘Evaluating the Impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study’,
The Journal of Economic Review, vol. 30, no. 2, 2005, pp. 25-48.
Moyo, D., Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa, Farrar,
Straus and Giroux, New York, 2009.
Nuruzzaman, M., ‘Neoliberal Economic Reforms, the Rich and the Poor in Bangladesh’, Journal of
Contemporary Asia, vol. 34, no. 1, 2004, pp. 33-54.
76
Obaydullah, M.A., ‘Impact of Foreign Aid on Development in Bangladesh’, PhD thesis, RMIT
University, Melbourne, Australia, 2007.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Bangladesh, OECD, Paris,
2011, <https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/Bangladesh%203.pdf>, consulted 13 April 2018.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Paris Declaration and Accra
Agenda for Action’, OECD’s website, Paris, 2018,
<http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm>, consulted
12 April 2018.
Osman, F.A., ‘Bangladesh Politics: Confrontation, Monopoly and Crisis in Governance’, Asian
Journal of Political Science, vol. 18, no. 3, 2010, pp. 310-333.
Owa, M., ‘Revisiting the Paris Declaration Agenda–An Inclusive, Realistic Orientation for Aid
Effectiveness’, Development in Practice, vol. 21, no. 7, 2011, pp. 987-998.
Parnini, S.N. and Othman, M.R., ‘Democratic Consolidation and Credibility of Governance
Institutions in Bangladesh’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, 2014, pp. 34-48.
Parnini, S.N., ‘Public Sector Reform and Good Governance: The Impact of Foreign Aid on
Bangladesh’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, vol. 44, no. 5, 2009, pp. 553-575.
Paul, R., Pillars of Prosperity: Free Markets, Honest Money, Private Property, Ludwig von Mises
Institute, Auburn, Alabama, 2008.
Petrakos, G. and Arvanitidis, P., ‘Determinants of Economic Growth’, Economic Alternatives, vol. 1,
no. 1, 2008, pp. 11-30
Pieterse, J.N., Development Theory: Deconstructions/Reconstructions, 2nd edn, SAGE publication

Ltd., London, 2010.
Pulok, M.H. and Ahmed, M.U., ‘Does Corruption Matter for Economic Development? Long Run
Evidence from Bangladesh’, International Journal of Social Economics, vol. 44, no. 3, 2017, pp. 350-
361.
Quibria, M.G. and Ahmad, S., Aid Effectiveness in Bangladesh, Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Paper 10299, Munich, 2007,
<https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10299/1/MPRA_paper_10299.pdf>, consulted, 13 April 2018.
Quibria, M.G., ‘Aid Effectiveness: Research, Policy and Unresolved Issues’, Development Studies
Research, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, pp. 75-87.
Rady, T., ‘Foreign Aid and Development: What Can Developing Nations Learn’, Journal of
Economics and Economic Education Research, vol. 13, no. 3, 2013, pp. 123-132.
Rahaman, M.M. and Khan, N.A., ‘Making International Aid Effective: An Agenda for Aligning Aid to
Social Business’, Development Policy Review, vol. 35, 2017, pp. 96-117.
Rahaman, M.M. and Khan, N.A., ‘The Realities of Aid Harmonisation and Aid Effectiveness: Views
from Bangladesh’, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, vol. 32, no. 1, 2010, pp. 107-122.
Rahim, M.Q., ‘Effects of Foreign Aid on GDP Growth and Fiscal Behavior: An Econometric Case
Study of Bangladesh’, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 38, no. 2, 2005, pp. 95-117.
Rahman, A., ‘Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from
Bangladesh’, International Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 7, no. 2, 2015, pp. 178-185.
77
Rahman, M.M., Bashar, M.A. and Dey, S., ‘External Debt and Gross Domestic Product in
Bangladesh: A Co-Integration Analysis’, Management Research and Practice, vol. 4, no. 4, 2012,
pp. 28-36.
Rahman, M.M., ‘Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Social Safety Net Programmes in
Bangladesh’, The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 50, no. 11, 2014, pp. 1550-1569.
Rahman, M.M., ‘The Factors Affecting Bangladesh's Exports: Evidence from the Gravity Model
Analysis’, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol.44, no. 1, 2010, pp. 229-244.
Rahman, M.S., Sadath, M.N. and Giessen, L., ‘Foreign Donors Driving Policy Change in Recipient
Countries: Three Decades of Development Aid Towards Community-Based Forest Policy in
Bangladesh’, Forest Policy and Economics, vol. 68, 2016, pp. 39-53.
Rahnama, M., Fawaz, F. and Gittings, K., ‘The Effects of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in
Developing Countries’, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 51, no. 3, 2017, pp. 153-171.
Rajan, R.G. and Subramanian, A., ‘Aid And Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really
Show?’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 90, no. 4, 2008, pp. 643-665.
Rana, E.A. and Wahid, A.N.M., ‘Fiscal Deficit and Economic Growth in Bangladesh: A Time-Series
Analysis’, The American Economist, vol. 62, no. 1, 2017, pp. 31-42.
Rao, B.B. and Hassan, G.M., ‘An Analysis of the Determinants of the Long-Run Growth Rate of
Bangladesh’, Applied Economics, vol. 44, no. 5, 2012, pp. 565-580.
Reci, A., ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Foreign Assistance in Albania’, Forum Scientiae
Oeconomia, vol. 2, no. 3, 2014, pp. 123-132.
Reza, S.M., Fan, H., Reza, T. and Wang, B., ‘The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment Inflows on
Economic Growth: Evidence from Bangladesh’, Journal of Business and Retail Management
Research, vol. 12, no. 2, 2018, pp. 212-223.
Roodman, D., ‘The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-Country Empirics’, The
World Bank Economic Review, vol. 21, no. 2, 2007, pp. 255-277.
Sabur, A.K.M.A., ‘Disaster Management System in Bangladesh’, India Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 1, 2012,
pp. 29-47.
Sachs, J.D., The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time, The Penguin Press, New
York, 2005.
Sahoo, K. and Sethi, N., ‘Effect of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth and Development in India: An
Empirical Analysis’, South Asian Journal of Management, vol. 20, no. 1, 2013, pp. 114-138.
Sahoo, P. and Dash, R., ‘Financial Sector Development and Domestic Savings in South
Asia’, Economic Modelling, vol. 33, 2013, pp. 388-397.
Saifuddin, M., ‘Public Debt and Economic Growth: Evidence from Bangladesh’, Global Journal of
Management and Business Research, vol. 16, no. 5, 2016, pp. 65-73.
Sala, S. and Bocchi, S., ‘Green Revolution Impacts in Bangladesh: Exploring Adaptation Pathways
for Enhancing National Food Security’, Climate and Development, vol. 6, no. 3, 2014, pp. 238-255.
Scholl, A., ‘Aid Effectiveness and Limited Enforceable Conditionality’, Review of Economic
Dynamics, vol. 12, no. 2, 2009, pp. 377-391.
Sen, A., Development as Freedom, Knopf, New York, 1999.
78
Shakil, S.H. and Ananya, T.H., ‘Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA):
Bangladesh Perspective’, Bangladesh E-journal of Sociology, vol. 12, no. 1, 2015, pp. 115-125.
Sindzingre, A., ‘Financing the Developmental State: Tax and Revenue Issues’, Development Policy
Review, vol. 25, no. 5, 2007, pp. 615-632.
Sobhan, R., ‘Challenging the Injustice of Poverty: Rethinking Aid Strategies’ in S. Folke and H.
Nielsen (eds.), Aid Impact and Poverty Reduction, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2006, pp. 31-51.
Sobhan, R., From Aid Dependence to Self-Reliance: Development Options for Bangladesh,
University Press Ltd., Dhaka, 1990.
Stokke, O., ‘Aid and Political Conditionality: Core Issues and the State of the Art’ in O. Stokke (ed.),
Aid and Political Conditionality, Frank Cass, London, 1995, pp. 1-87.
Tajoli, L., ‘The Impact of Tied Aid on Trade Flows between Donor and Recipient Countries’, Journal
of International Trade and Economic Development, vol. 8, no. 4, 1999, pp. 373-388.
Tarp, F., ‘Aid and Development’, Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol. 13, no. 2, 2006, pp. 9-61.
Tarp, F., ‘Aid, Growth, and Development’ in G. Mavrotas (ed.), Foreign Aid for Development: Issues,
Challenges, and the New Agenda, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010, pp. 20-53.
Tashmin, N., ‘Can Climate Finance in Bangladesh Be Helpful in Making Transformational Change
in Ecosystem Management?’, Environmental Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1-10.
The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Millennium Development Goals: Bangladesh Progress

Report 2015, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2015,
<http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/MDGs-Bangladeh-Progress-Report_-
PDF_Final_September-2015.pdf>, consulted 12 March 2018.
The Planning Commission of Bangladesh, Seventh Five Year Plan: FY2016-FY2020, Government
of Bangladesh, Dhaka, 2015,
<http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/7FYP_after-NEC_11_11_2015.pdf>,
consulted 10 March 2018.
The World Bank (WB) and The Asian Development Bank (ADB), Bangladesh: Economic Trends and
the Policy Agenda, The WB and The ADB, Dhaka, 2008,
<http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/691201468768008848/pdf/30617.pdf>, consulted 12
April 2018.
The World Bank (WB), Project Performance Assessment Report Bangladesh: Dhaka Urban
Transport Project, The WB Report No. 39323, Dhaka, 2007,
<http://www.oecd.org/countries/bangladesh/39618742.pdf>, consulted 09 March 2018.
The World Bank (WB), ‘Tax Revenue (% of GDP)’, The WB’s website, Washington, D.C., 2018,
<https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.TAX.TOTL.GD.ZS>, consulted 18 March 2018.
The World Bank (WB), ‘Unemployment, Total (% of Total Labor Force) (Modeled ILO Estimate)’, The
WB’s website, Washington D.C., 2018,
<https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS?locations=BD&page=5>, consulted 02
May 2018.
Thornton, J., ‘Does Foreign Aid Reduce Tax Revenue? Further Evidence’, Applied Economics, vol.
46, no. 4, 2014, pp. 359-373.
79
Transparency International, ‘Corruption Perception Index: Overview', Transparency International’s
website, Berlin, 2018, <https://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview>, consulted 08 April
2018.
Uddin, M.A., Ali, M.H. and Masih, M., ‘Political Stability and Growth: An Application of Dynamic GMM
and Quantile Regression’, Economic Modelling, vol. 64, 2017, pp. 610-625.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Bangladesh Improves in Human Development

Index’, UNDP’s website, New York, 2017,
<http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/ourwork/news/bangladesh-improves-in-
human-development-index/>, consulted 03 April 2018.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Bangladesh's Progress on the MDGs’, UNDP’s
website, New York, 2018,
<http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/post-2015/millennium-development-
goals.html>, consulted 06 April 2018.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2016: Bangladesh,
UNDP, Dhaka, 2016, <http://hdr.undp.org/sites/all/themes/hdr_theme/country-notes/BGD.pdf>,
consulted 01 May 2018.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Strengthening Capacity for Aid Effectiveness in
Bangladesh: What is the Project about?’, UNDP’s website, Dhaka, 2018,
<http://www.bd.undp.org/content/bangladesh/en/home/operations/projects/democratic_governance
/strengthening-capacity-for-aid-effectiveness-in-bangladesh.html>, consulted 15 April 2018.
Vijil, M. and Wagner, L., ‘Does Aid for Trade Enhance Export Performance? Investigating the
Infrastructure Channel’, The World Economy, vol. 35, no. 7, 2012, pp. 838-868.
Wagner, C., ‘The Role of India and China in South Asia’, Strategic Analysis, vol. 40, no. 4, 2016, pp.
307-320.
Waheduzzaman and Mphande, C.H.B., ‘Gaps in Pursuing Participatory Good Governance’,

Administration and Society, vol. 46, no. 1, 2014, pp. 37-69.
Waheduzzaman, W., ‘Politics and Policy in Achieving Participatory Governance in a Developing

Country Context’, Politics and Policy, vol. 43, no. 4, 2015, pp. 474-501.
White, H., ‘The Bangladesh Health SWAp: Experience of a New Aid Instrument in Practice’,
Development Policy Review, vol. 25, no. 4, 2007, pp. 451-472.
Williamson, J., ‘The Strange History of the Washington Consensus’, Journal of Post Keynesian
Willis, K., Theories and Practices of Development, Routledge, London and New York, 2005.
Winters, M.S. and Martinez, G., ‘The Role of Governance in Determining Foreign Aid Flow
Composition’, World Development, vol. 66, 2015, pp. 516-531.
Winters, M.S., Dietrich, S. and Mahmud, M., ‘Perceptions of Foreign Aid Project Quality in
Bangladesh’, Research and Politics, vol. 4, no. 4, 2017, pp. 1-6.
World Integrated Trade Solution, ‘Bangladesh Trade Statistics’, The World Bank’s website,
Washington, D.C., 2018, <https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/BGD>, consulted 16 March
2018.
Younus, S., ‘Monetary Transmission Channels in Bangladesh: Evidence from a Floating Exchange
Rate Regime’, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 51, no. 2, 2017, pp. 255-272.
80
Zafarullah, H. and Rahman, R., ‘The Impaired State: Assessing State Capacity and Governance in
Bangladesh’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 21, no. 7, 2008, pp. 739-752.
Zaman, H. and Akbar, M.I., ‘Exploring Non-Traditional Sources of Development Finance: The Case
of Remittance in Bangladesh’, Progress in Development Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 2013, pp. 105-116.
81

Thesis Kabir 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Thesis Kabir 2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Thesis Kabir 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Foreign Aid in Bangladesh:

Its Contributions to Economic Growth and Development

A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of

College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Date 28 May 2018 .

Figure 3.2 Percentage of aid categories in aid disbursement (from FY 21

Figure 3.3 Disbursement of Food Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 21

Figure 3.4 Disbursement of Commodity Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 22

Figure 3.5 Disbursement of Project Aid (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 23

Figure 3.6 Disbursement of Budget Support (from FY 1971-72 to 2015-16) 23

Figure 3.7 Disbursement of foreign aid in major sectors (from FY 1971-72 24

Figure 3.9 Outstanding debt by source of aid (from FY 2012-13 to 2015-16) 26

Figure 3.11 Top ten donors as per accumulated disbursement (from FY 27

Table 2.1 Summary of the cross-country regression analyses based on the 10

Table 4.2 Bangladesh’s aid, 1995-2012, broken down by purpose and 35

Table 5.1 Percentages of ADP utilization and disbursement of aid in FY 48

Table 6.1 The progress of aid effectiveness measures in Bangladesh up to 57

ADB - Asian Development Bank

ADP - Annual Development Program

AFT - Aid for Trade

AIIB - Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

AIMS - Aid Information Management System

AP-DEF - Asia Pacific Development Effectiveness Facility

AusAid - Australian Aid

BDF - Bangladesh Development Forum

BNSDS - Bangladesh National Sustainable Development Strategy

BRIC - Brazil, Russia, India and China

CO2 - Carbon Di-oxide

CPI - Consumer Price Index

CPI - Corruption Perception Index

DAC - Development Assistance Committee

DDM - Double Deficit Method

DFID - Department for International Development

DMA - Dhaka Metropolitan Area

EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment

ERD - Economic Relations Division

FDI - Foreign Direct Investment

FFW - Food for Work

GDP - Gross Domestic Product

GFC - Global Fund for Climate Change

HAP - Harmonised Action Plan

IATI - International Aid Transparency Initiative

IDA - International Development Association

IDB - Islamic Development Bank

IMF - International Monetary Fund

IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

JCS - Joint Cooperation Strategy

LCG - Local Consultative Group

LDCs - Least Developed Countries

MDGs - Millennium Development Goals

MTBF - Medium-Term Budgetary Framework

NGO - Non-Government Organisation

NPDC - National Policy on Development Cooperation

ODI - The Overseas Development Institute

OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and

PFM - Public Financial Management

PPP - Public-Private Partnership

SAPs - Structural Adjustment Programs

SWAp - Sector-wise Approach

UNDP - United Nations Development Programme