Aadhar vs Anees Ahmad (Bulandshahr)
Aadhar vs Anees Ahmad (Bulandshahr)
Aadhar vs Anees Ahmad (Bulandshahr)
VERSUS
3. Anees Ahmad
Also At:-
Mohalla Bada Kot (Ganj Sadat), Shikarpur 13, Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh –
203131.
…BORROWER/RESPONDENTS
BOUNDED AS: -
EAST - RASTA 6M WIDE
WEST - PLOT AJIMUDDIN AND NAWAB KHAN.
NORTH - PLOT MOHD. UMAR
SOUTH - RASTA 6M WIDE.
9. The Applicant further says and submits that, despite the said
notice dated 10.04.2024 the Respondents have neither
complied with the requisitions for payment of outstanding
loan amount within the stipulated period of 60 days as
mentioned in the said notice dated 10.04.2024 nor raised
any objections/replied to the said Notice under Section 13 (3-
A) of the SARFAESI Act and never approached the Applicant
for showing their bonafide for payment of outstanding loan
amount. Therefore, the Applicant are desirous of taking
physical possession of the Secured Asset in peaceful manner
under the provisions of sub-section (4) of Section 13 read
with Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act by taking assistance of
this Hon’ble Court as the Respondents had committed
default in repayment of the said loan.
11. That the provisions of this Act and rule made there under
have been complied by the Applicant Company.
-: PRAYER :-
BOUNDED AS: -
EAST - RASTA 6M WIDE
WEST - PLOT AJIMUDDIN AND NAWAB KHAN.
NORTH - PLOT MOHD. UMAR
SOUTH - RASTA 6M WIDE.
2. Pass any other or further order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit
and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
VERIFICATION:
I, NISHANT CHAUDHARY, Authorized Officer, of the
Applicant having its office address mentioned in cause title, do
hereby verify that the contents of above-mentioned paragraphs
are stated on information and belief as gathered from the
records maintained by Applicant Company and that I have not
suppressed
For AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD.
Authorized Officer
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
BULANDSHAHR, UTTAR RADESH
APPLICATION NO.__________OF 2024
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
6. That the borrowers had not sent made any representation under
Section 13(3) A and did not reply the said Notice.That the
deponent states that despite service of the said notice under
Section 13(2) respondents failed to clear the dues. Therefore the
deponent is entitled to take possession of the secured asset
under the provisions of sub section 4 of section 13 read with
section 14 of the said act.
7. That the deponent states that the provisions of this act and the
rules made there under had been complied with.
8. That no stay order has been served on applicant till the day with
regard to secured asset in question either by any Court.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
VERSUS
INDEX
S.NO PAGE
PARTICULARS
. NO.
1. Application Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002
along with affidavit.
Vakalatnama
IN THE HON’BLE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
BULANDSHAHR, UTTAR RADESH
APPLICATION NO.__________OF 2024
VERSUS
ACCEPTED:-
…………………………..……
MANISH, RAHUL JAISWAL
Advocates Signature of the Client.
MOB. NO. 9773575379. Authorised Officer
Dated:
On behalf of Applicant
AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LTD.