Cebu City FAIR USE ACT DISCLAIMER Some Content Images may require Strict Parental Guidance (SPG). This virtual class presentation is for educational purposes only. Some images and contents in this power point presentation are not my original works. Some are lifted from the internet using google and yahoo search engines. Fair Use Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute
that might otherwise be infringing. At the end of this module, the students should be able to: 1. Know the legal provisions relating to sexual harassment under RA 7877 otherwise known as the “Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 1995” in the Philippines. 2. Internalize the essence of this law and apply its relevance when the need arises. 3. Actively share the learning and possible gains of this law to others who may need advises in relation to this matter. At the end of this module, the students should be able to: 4. Monitor, regulate and set certain rules or parameters in school activities and programs to be implemented as well the workplace, education and training ethics be applied to avoid any forms of sexual harassment. AN ACT DECLARING SEXUAL HARASSMENT UNLAWFUL IN THE EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION OR TRAINING ENVIRONMENT, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES This Act shall be known as the “Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of 1995.” Senate shall value: •the dignity of every individual, •enhance human development resources, •guarantee full respect for human rights, and •uphold the dignity of workers, employees, applicants for employment, students or those undergoing training, instructions or education. Towards this end, all forms of sexual harassment in the employment, education or training environment are hereby declared unlawful. Committed by an employer, employee, manager, supervisor, agent of the employer, teacher, instructor, professor, coach, trainer, or any other person who, having authority, influence or moral ascendancy over another in a work or training or education environment, Demands, requests or otherwise requires any sexual favor from the other regardless of whether the demand, request or requirements for submission is accepted by the object of said Act. (1) The sexual favor is made as a condition in the hiring or in the employment, re-employment or continued employment of said individual, or in granting said individual favorable compensation, terms, conditions, promotions, or privileges, or the refusal to grant the sexual favor results in limiting, segregating or classifying the employee which in any way would discriminate, deprive or diminish employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect said employee; (2) The above acts would impair the employee’s rights or privileges under existing labor laws; or (3) The above acts would result in an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment for the employee. (1)Against one who is under the care, custody or supervision of the offender;
(2)Against one whose
education, training, apprenticeship or tutorship is entrusted to the offender; (3) When the sexual favor is made a condition to the giving of a passing grade, or the granting of honors and scholarships, or the payment of a stipend, allowance or other benefits, privileges or considerations, or (4) When the sexual advances result in an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment for the student, trainee or apprentice. Any person who directs or induces another to commit any act of sexual harassment as herein defined, or who cooperates in the commission thereof by another without which it would not have been committed, shall also be held liable under this Act. It shall be the duty of the employer or the head of the work-related, educational or training environment or institution, to prevent or deter the commission of acts of sexual harassment and to provide the procedures for the resolution, settlement or prosecution of acts of sexual harassment. Towards this end, the employer or head of office shall: (a)Promulgate appropriate rules and regulations in consultation with and jointly approved by the employees or students or trainees, through their duly designated representatives, prescribing the procedure for the investigation of sexual harassment cases and the… administrative sanctions shall not be a bar to prosecution in the proper courts for unlawful acts of sexual harassment. The said rules and regulations issued pursuant to this sub-section (a) shall include, among others, guidelines on proper decorum in the workplace and educational or training institutions. (b) Create a committee on decorum and investigation of cases on sexual harassment. The committee shall conduct meetings, as the case may be, with officers and employees, teachers, instructors, professors, coaches, trainors and students or trainees to increase understanding and prevent incidents of sexual… harassment. It shall also conduct the investigation of alleged cases constituting sexual harassment. In the case of a work-related environment, the committee shall be composed of: at least one (1) representative each from the management, the union, if any, the employees from the supervisory rank, and from the rank and file employees. In the case of the educational or training institution, the committee shall be composed of: at least one (1) representative from the administration, the trainor, teachers, instructors, professors or coaches and students or trainees, as the case may be. In the case of the educational or training institution, the committee shall be composed of: The employer or head of office, educational or training institution shall disseminate or post a copy of this Act for the information of all concerned. The employee or head of office, educational or training institution, shall be solidarily liable for damages arising from the acts of sexual harassment committed in the employment, education or training environment if the employer or head of office, educational or training is informed of such acts by the offended party and no immediate action is taken thereon. Nothing in this Act shall preclude the victim of work, education or training-related sexual harassment from instituting a separate and independent action for damages and other affirmative relief. Any person who violates the provisions of this Act shall, upon conviction, be penalized by: imprisonment of not less than one (1) month nor more than six (6) months, or a fine of not less than Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000) not more than Twenty Thousand Pesos (P20,000), Any person who violates the provisions of this Act shall, upon conviction, be penalized by: or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court. Any action arising from the violation of the provisions of this Act shall prescribe in three (3) years. If any portion or provision of this Act is declared void or unconstitutional, the remaining portions or provisions hereof shall not be affected by such declaration. All laws, decrees, orders, rules and regulations, other issuances, or parts thereof inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are hereby repealed or modified accordingly. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its complete publication in at least two (2) national newspapers of general circulation. Approved: February 14, 1995 Sexual Harassment is a problem that many, particularly women, had to deal with since time immemorial although we did not have a name on it. 2) Race-related sexual aggression was usually associated with the possession of legal and property rights of slave-owners over their slaves. In Villarama vs. NLRC, which was decided by the Supreme Court before September 1, 1994 (that is, before the enactment of RA 7877), the court already made references to sexual harassment as a valid cause for dismissal, declaring- “sexual harassment abounds in all sick societies. It is reprehensible enough but more so when inflicted by those with moral ascendancy over their victims. We rule that it is a valid cause of separation from services.” “x x x as a managerial employee, petitioner is bound by a more exacting work ethics. He failed to live up to this higher standard of responsibility when he succumbed to his moral perversity is perpetrated against his subordinate, he provides a justifiable ground for his dismissal for lack of trust and confidence. It is the right and the duty of every employer to protect it’s employees from over- sexed superiors.” In the case of Yolanda Floralde et al. vs. CA, the Supreme Court categorically stated that sexual harassment in the work place is not about a man taking advantage of a woman by reason of sexual desire; it is about power being exercised by a superior officer over his woman subordinates. The power emanates from the fact that the superior can remove the subordinate from his workplace if the latter would refuse his amorous advances. it refers to “any remark, request, invitation, gesture, or other verbal or physical behavior which is: (1) sexual in nature, or has sexual undertones; (2) unwelcome to the person to whom it is directed. 1) The behavior is unwanted or unwelcome; 2) The behavior is sexual or related to the gender of the person; 3) The behavior occurs in the context of a relationship where one person has more formal power than the other I. FORMS sexual harassment can be (a) visual;(b) verbal; (c) physical; and (d) gestural. II. TYPES a. Quid pro quo sexual harassment happens when the harasser demands sexual favors as a condition for hiring or promoting, or in the academic environment, as a condition for passing the exam or the subject (kuwarto o kwatro). It also includes threats of retaliation if the harasser does not get what he wants. b. Hostile work environment - there is no need for an explicit or implicit promise of benefit or threat of harm if the victim refuses to submit to the harasser’s demands. -It is sufficient that the unwelcome sexual conduct creates an “offensive, hostile, oppressive and intimidating work environment” even if there is no economic consequences. c. Bystander harassment - is also another form. Even if complainant is not directly the victim, the fact that SH is pervasive in school, there may still be hostile environment, should the sexually harassing conduct permeate her immediate environment and she witnessed it personally. d. Sexual favoritism - it occurs when a student or employee receives benefits as a result of his/her submission to sexual advances or requests for sexual favors. The victims or the harassment may be the other students/employees who are treated unfairly because they are not objects of the romantic interest of a supervisor. 1.) Sexual innuendos, comments, or bantering; 2.) Asking or commenting about a person’s sexuality; 3.) Humor or jokes about sex or females in general; 4.) Persistent sexual attention, especially when it continues after a clear indication that it is unwanted; 5.) Asking for sexual behavior; 6.) Touching a person, including patting, pinching, stroking, squeezing, hugging or brushing against his or her body; 7.) Touching or grabbing a person’s breasts, crotch, or buttocks; 8.) Giving a neck or shoulder massage with malicious intent or giving “extra service”; 9.) Leering or ogling, such as “elevator eyes” or staring at a woman’s breast or body; 10.) Spreading rumors about a person’s sexual activities; 11.) Calling men and women names such as “hot stuff,” “cutie pie,” “bitch,” “whore,” or “slut”, toy boy, macho papa; call boy. 12.) Making obscene or sexually suggestive gestures or sexual sounds such as sucking or kissing noises; 13.) Sexual graffiti in general or about a particular person; 14.) Using sexual ridicule to denigrate or insult a person; 15.) Sending sexual mail, notes, e-mail, or making sexually explicit phone calls; 16.) Sending, giving, showing, or displaying sexual materials, including pornography, sexual pictures, cartoons and calendars; 17.) Laughing at or not taking seriously someone who experiences sexual harassment; 18.) Blaming the victim for sexual harassment for having caused it; 19.) Making denigrating, sexist remarks about women in general or about a particular woman; 20.) Stalking a person either on or off campus; 21.) Direct or indirect threats or bribes for sexual activity; and 22.) Attempted or actual sexual assault or abuse. 1.) Shouting obscenities at men or women as they pass a fraternity house or other place where men gather; 2.) Loudly discussing a man or woman’s sexual attributes and rating his or her attractiveness, a practice called “scoping”; 3.) Mooning women, whereby men aggressively expose their buttocks; 4.) Pulling down men or women’s shorts or pants; 5.) Creating a sexually demeaning atmosphere, such as displaying posters and pictures that are sexist or otherwise demeaning to women, or having social events focusing on women’s sexuality, such as wet T-shirt contests (Sinulog Events); 6.) Showing petty hostility to women by throwing things, pouring drinks over women’s heads or on their breast, heckling women when they enter a room, or making sexual remarks; 7.) Body passing at stadiums; 8.) Biting a woman (“sharking”); and 9.) Threatening rape or other sexual abuse Adopt the “Reasonable Man or Woman standard” to determine whether a conduct is unwelcome and sufficiently pervasive to amount to sexual harassment. Less revealing clothing may protect you against self- objectification and sexual harassment.