Centrifugal Pump Application using VFDS

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 29

Pump Applications Using VFDs

Are VFDs worth it for pump applications?


Have they been oversold to the market?
Presented by
Geoffrey D Stone C.Eng FIMechE; CP Eng FIEAust RPEQ
Design Detail & Development
http://waterhammer.hopout.com.au/ Skype address [email protected]
Why Are VFDs Specified for Pumps
 Process conditions are not  Electrical supply restraint-
fully developed Soft starting
 Variable process conditions  Braking- Dynamic or hold
 Poor pump selection  Unlimited number of starts
 Future process upgrades and stops
 Energy efficiency-Reduced  Waterhammer mitigation-
operating cost Fatigue
 Prior art-Industry practice  Ignorance -Engineer having
 Over-speeding a pump to no understanding of other
reduce pump frame size process control solutions
Pump Speed Control Solutions
Mechanical Electrical
 Cone & disc variator  Variable Frequency Drive
 Cyclic variator  Eddy current drive
 Vee belt & pulleys  Two speed motor
 Gearbox  Direct Current drives
 Internal combustion engine  Slip ring motors
 Scoop control fluid  Multiple pole motors
couplings  Relay pulsed motors
 Hydraulic drive
Process Solutions-Alternatives
 Pressure, temperature  Change pump impeller
or flow control valves diameter
 Bypass valves  Alternate pump type
 Larger suction tanks or  Multiple pumps
sumps  Different sized pumps
 Holding tank
 Pump for longer
periods
 Stop/start controls
Pump Considerations
Pump Selection-The Issues
 Duty point(s)  Casing pressure rating
 Static head (Hs)  Efficiency
 Friction loss (Hf)  Specific speed
 Dead head  Moment of inertia
 Transients  Curve shape
 Design factors  Stability over range
- head  Best efficiency point
- flow  1st Critical speed
- NPSHa
System Design-Issues
 Software allows the  Motor/VFD Efficiency
analysis of systems  Wire to Water kW
 Excessive design  The original Affinity
factors used Laws are based on
 Pump suppliers design systems with no static
factors head
 New vs. Old pipe  Affinity Laws overstate
friction losses energy savings
 Pipe wall /lining  Revise the 2nd Affinity
tolerances Law for Minimum Flow
Pump Curve #1-VFD Viable
Pump Curve #2-VFD Not Viable
Existing Pump is Oversized?
This is a common pump dilemma that VFDs are used
to solve but the VFD does NOT save the energy! The
credit goes to the reduced head/flow requirements.
 VFD suppliers offer the retro-fit of a VFD to change
pump speed to meet reduced process conditions
 Change of pump or impeller reduced diameter
achieves the necessary reduced flow, hence power
 A flow control valve achieves the necessary reduced
flow and maintain the best efficiency point (BEP)
 A multiple small pumps and motor could be cost
effective
Pump Curve #3-VFD, control valve or reduced
impeller viable
Pumps using VFDs- Considerations
 Energy savings with a VFD occurs for duties reduced
to between 60% to 85% of the BEP.
 Where duty is reduced to only 85% of BEP, a control
valve or reduced impeller energy demand is less
than that for the combined VFD installation
inefficiencies
 Wire to water energy kW-hr per m3 delivered
should be the criteria used in assessing a VFD
application
 VFDs offer little benefit for systems with more than
50% static head
 VFDs are ideal for closed systems with varying
process duties-no static head
Electrical Design Considerations
What is a Variable Frequency Drive?
Legacy- < 600Hz Today >20kHz
 BJTs (Bipolar Junction  IGBT (Insulated Gate
Transistor) Bipolar Transistor)- these
 SCRs (Silicon Controlled offer the benefits of higher
Rectifier) frequencies and increased
 GTO (Gate Turn Off
efficiencies
Thyristor)
Electrical Factors to be Considered
 Voltage (LV, MV or HV)  Overspeed capability
 Power  Braking requirements
 Line & load side harmonics  Power loss
 Load torque  Ride through time
 Speed range  Audible noise
 Speed regulation  Length/type of cable
 Failure mode  Power factor correction
 Acceleration/deceleration  Altitude
times  Motor, insulation and VFD
 Efficiency life

Mechanical engineers are required to


understand the electrical issues
Cable

 Voltage peaks at motor terminals can be increased


to 2 times the peaks of the VFD output for a long
cable
 25m is the recommended cable length
 Cables longer than 25m have an inductive load that
affects a motor’s life
 Cables need to be screened to avoid EMI
Motor Considerations
Bearing Damage –Induced Shaft Voltage
Induced Shaft Current Types
1. Conductive mode bearing
current-low speed , good
conductivity.
2. Discharge mode bearing
current-higher inverter
output frequencies-The
capacitive voltage builds
up until it is able to break
down the dielectric
resistance of the grease.

Induced shaft voltage with no


shaft brush or insulated bearing
Motor Cooling
 Below 25hz motor fan speed will not cool motor
 Supplementary fan required
 Added cost of drive, cable, SCA, controls, access and
maintenance
 Reduced reliability
Efficiency
 Published motor efficiency
data is based on a pure
sinusoidal voltage
 The high frequency
harmonics created by VFDs
increase copper and core
losses decreasing the
efficiency of the motor
 Materials behave differently
under these operating
conditions resulting in a
higher efficiency drop when
fed by VFDs.
Current
 A higher r.m.s. current to supply the same
output (about 10% higher)
 Increase in motor operating temperature
 On average, VFD fed motors will have a
temperature increase of about 15°C, at rated
speed and load
Noise Level
 Due to the harmonics, the motor noise level will
increase when it is operated using a VFD
 Experience shows that the sound pressure level at A
scale at motor rated speed is increased by anything
between 2 and 15dBA with a VFD
 This “ extra ” noise level depends mainly on the
inverter switching frequency and harmonic
content.
 Noise mitigation costs increase
Motor Design Life
Standards Damage
 IEC 34-17 and DIN VDE 530 VFD  Repeated voltage peaks
voltage peaks (Vp) < 1,000V and breakdown die-electric
dV/dT <500 V/µs but VFD strength of insulation
motors are subjected to 5000V/µs  Die electric strength reduced
and 1,500V by humidity & temperature
 Voltage peaks depend on carrier  Corona & partial discharge
frequency destroy motors
 dV/dT affects the insulation  Standard motors design life
between turns, the high voltage reduced by up to 75%
spikes affect the insulation between
 Standard insulation varnish is
phases and phase to ground NOT acceptable
Commercial Considerations
Costs of a Pump/VFD Installation
Capex Opex
 VFD components with a  VFD inefficiency ≤ 95%
design life < 10years  Inefficiency of motor
 Larger switchroom  Supplementary fans
 Increased air conditioning  Special motor spares
 Screened cable  Air conditioning energy
 Harmonic protection  Reduced life of motor
 Special motors  Spares for VFD
 Supplementary fans  Spares costs oversize pump
 Increase in noise mitigation  Risk & reliability (FMECA)
 Increased design costs  Increase in noise
Commercial-Other
 Engineers who use suppliers to select pumps or process
solutions lose engineering control of the procurement
process
 Pump suppliers do not necessarily know, or care, about
the process vs. electrical requirements of the VFD/motor
interface-divided responsibility
 String testing motor/pump/VFD is difficult during the
contract period for larger motors because of :-
-time
-manufacture location of components
-responsibility of the other parties equipment
-packing/unpacking/re-packing
Conclusions
 Engineers need to specify all operating & electrical conditions to
pump, motor & VFD supplier
 Invest in the mechanical engineering and specify correctly
 Future operating conditions may not occur. If they do they can be
met with alternate solutions
 VFDs do not always save energy, Capex or Opex
 VFDs do not avoid transients from power loss
 VFDs provide a suitable solution to some pump operating
conditions but should not be considered a panacea
 “You just can't ever beat the energy efficiency of running a
properly sized pump at 100% BEP rated flow”.
 Mechanical engineers have a poor understanding of electric motors
& VFDs and fail to communicate with process or electrical
engineers
Questions

Please ask questions remembering


I am a mechanical engineer!
Useful links
This presentation was by
 sulzerpumps.com
Geoff Stone
[email protected]  mcnallyinstitute.com
 eng-tips.com
Tel 0402 35 2313
Or  nidi.org
02 8850 2313  pumpsystemsmatter.org
 aft.com
 toshont.com/vfdapp.htm
 virtualpipeline.spaces.live.com
 canterburyengineeringassociates.com

You might also like