AI Convention Brochure

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

COUNCIL OF EUROPE

FRAMEWORK CONVENTION
ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
AND HUMAN RIGHTS,
DEMOCRACY AND
THE RULE OF LAW
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF
THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION?

■ The Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human


Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law is the first international legally binding instrument in
this field. It aims to ensure that activities within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems
are fully consistent with human rights, democracy and the rule of law, while being conducive
to technological progress and innovation.
■ The Framework Convention complements existing international standards on human
rights, democracy and the rule of law, and aims to fill any legal gaps that may result from
rapid technological advances. In order to stand the test of time, the Framework Convention
does not regulate technology and is essentially technology-neutral.

HOW WAS THE FRAMEWORK


CONVENTION ELABORATED?
■ Work was initiated in 2019, when the ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI)
was tasked with examining the feasibility of such an instrument. Following its mandate, it
was succeeded in 2022 by the Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) which drafted and
negotiated the text.
■ The Framework Convention was drafted by the 46 member states of the Council of
Europe, with the participation of all observer states: Canada, Japan, Mexico, the Holy See
and the United States of America, as well as the European Union, and a significant number
of non-member states: Australia, Argentina, Costa Rica, Israel, Peru and Uruguay.
■ In line with the Council of Europe’s practice of multi-stakeholder engagement, 68
international representatives from civil society, academia and industry, as well as several
other international organisations were also actively involved in the development of the
Framework Convention.
WHAT DOES THE FRAMEWORK
CONVENTION REQUIRE STATES TO DO?

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
■ Activities within the lifecycle of AI systems must comply with the following
fundamental principles:
► Human dignity and individual autonomy
► Equality and non-discrimination
► Respect for privacy and personal data protection
► Transparency and oversight
► Accountability and responsibility
► Reliability
► Safe innovation

REMEDIES, PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND SAFEGUARDS


► Document the relevant information regarding AI systems and
their usage and to make it available to affected persons;
► The information must be sufficient to enable people concerned to
challenge the decision(s) made through the use of the system or
based substantially on it, and to challenge the use of the system itself;
► Effective possibility to lodge a complaint to competent authorities;
► Provide effective procedural guarantees, safeguards
and rights to affected persons in connection with the
application of an artificial intelligence system where an
artificial intelligence system significantly impacts upon the
enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms;
► Provision of notice that one is interacting with an artificial
intelligence system and not with a human being.

RISK AND IMPACT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS


► Carry out risk and impact assessments in respect of actual
and potential impacts on human rights, democracy
and the rule of law, in an iterative manner;
► Establishment of sufficient prevention and mitigation measures
as a result of the implementation of these assessments;
► Possibility for the authorities to introduce ban or moratoria
on certain application of AI systems (“red lines”).
WHO IS COVERED BY
THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION?

■ The Framework Convention covers the use of AI systems by public authorities –


including private actors acting on their behalf – and private actors.
■ The Convention offers Parties two modalities to comply with its principles and obli-
gations when regulating the private sector: Parties may opt to be directly obliged by the
relevant Convention provisions or, as an alternative, take other measures to comply with the
treaty’s provisions while fully respecting their international obligations regarding human
rights, democracy and the rule of law.
■ Parties to the Framework Convention are not required to apply the provisions of the
treaty to activities related to the protection of their national security interests but must
ensure that such activities respect international law and democratic institutions and
processes. The Framework Convention does not apply to national defence matters nor to
research and development activities, except when the testing of AI systems may have the
potential to interfere with human rights, democracy, or the rule of law.
HOW IS THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE FRAMEWORK
CONVENTION MONITORED?
■ The Framework Convention establishes a follow-up
mechanism, the Conference of the Parties, composed of
official representatives of the Parties to the Convention
to determine the extent to which its provisions are being
implemented. Their findings and recommendations help to
ensure States’ compliance with the Framework Convention
and guarantee its long-term effectiveness. The Conference
of the Parties shall also facilitate co-operation with relevant
stakeholders, including through public hearings concerning
pertinent aspects of the implementation of the Framework
Convention.
www.coe.int/AI

Prems 086024
Council of Europe Digital Governance

ENG

The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading


human rights organisation. It comprises 46 member
states, including all members of the European
Union. All Council of Europe member states have
www.coe.int signed up to the European Convention on Human
Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights,
democracy and the rule of law. The European Court
of Human Rights oversees the implementation
of the Convention in the member states.

You might also like