Hip bone, anatomy project
Hip bone, anatomy project
Hip bone, anatomy project
6 of 10
fi
the time they reached the age of 18 or 20 affecting it’s normal function.
years old. Yet, study indicates that an
auxiliary ossification center referred to as The results indicate a significant variations
an os acetabulum may continue to exist as in the hip bone, using different equipment
an ossicle, the prevalence of Os is and sources.
estimated to be between 3.4% to 7.7%, with
higher numbers in males compared to Beginning with True Os acetabuli which
females. intact Hyaline cartilage surrounds was defined as an unfused secondary
the os acetabuli, which are not fused to the ossification centre along the acetabular rim.
acetabulum.[13] An interpretation of other studies in Os
Acetabuli reveals correspond between the
results, which focused on investigating the
results of arthroscopic treatment of Os
Acetabuli in 273 patients, by orthro MRI,
21 of them (7,7%) 20 of them were male,
were diagnosed with Os Acetabuli.[13]
Conclusion
Figure 9 : Transverse T1-weighted image In summary, anatomical variations occurs
showing the bi d iliopsoas tendon. [4] frequently in clinical anatomy and practice,
A further anatomical variation has been as a medical professional it is a must to
mentioned of the acetabular roof is the recognize these variations because they
supraacetabular fossa (SAF) that can may lead to a change in the clinical practice
resemble a cartilage defect. There are two routine or dissection sessions.
distinct subtypes known: type 1 fluid-filled
and type 2 cartilage-filled. According to In our research many studies were observed
reports, the adult prevalence of SAF ranged considering the anatomical variations
from 10.5% to 12.6%. an additional study compared to the normal hip bone anatomy,
that looks at the incidence of SAF in a via multiple approaches such as cadaveric
group of kids and young adults and looks dissections, MRI, and hip arthroscopy,
into any possible remodeling of the which indicates a variety of results
subtypes over time, found results that link including supraacetabular fossa,
the prevalence of the SAF and age. Where pectinofoveal fold, the ilipsoas tendon,
Study participants ranged in age from 4 to synovial Herniation Pits and Os acetabuli.
25. According to the study, 63 of the 323 Sex, age, and pathological factors were
115 (or 35.6%) participants with SAF had included in the discussion as a potential
type 1, 51 had type 2, and one had both. factors that could affect the prevalence of
The expected probability for SAF increases such unique anatomical characteristics of
up to the age of 14, at which point the the hip bone. Finally, there is a need for
combined predicted probability for both further research on the assessment and
subtypes declined once more. So learning of these anatomical variations in
Adolescents are more likely to experience the medical field.
SAF. thus the size and prevalence of the
SAF decreased with age.[16]
8 of 10
fi
8) Tatu L., Parratte B., Vuillier M., et al.
References Descriptive anatomy of the femoral portion
of the iliopsoas muscle: Anatomical basis
Paragraphs and studies’ references
of anterior snapping of the hip. Surg
1)Gray, H. (2013). Grays Anatomy. Radiol Anat. 2001;23:371–374. - https://
Arcturus Publishing. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11963618/
Rotini R., Spinozzi C., Ferrari A. Snapping
2) Alraddadi A. (2021). Literature Review hip: A rare form of internal etiology. Ital
of Anatomical Variations: Clinical J Orthop Traumatol. 1991;17:283–288. -
Significance, Identification Approach, and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1797741/
Teaching Strategies. Cureus, 13(4), e14451.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14451 9) Jacobson T., Allen W.C. Surgical
correction of the snapping iliopsoas tendon.
3) Mike S. Nguyen, Valeriy Kheyfits, Brian Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:470–474. -
D. Giordano, Gregory Dieudonne, and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2252086/
Johnny U. V. Monu. Hip Anatomic Variants
That May Mimic Pathologic Entities on 10) Deslandes M., Guillin R., Cardinal E.,
MRI: Nonlabral Variants. American Journal Hobden R., Bureau N.J. The snapping
of Roentgenology 2013 201:3, W401- iliopsoas tendon: New mechanisms using
W408 https://www.ajronline.org/doi/epdf/ dynamic sonography. AJR Am J
10.2214/AJR.12.9861 Roentgenol. 2008;190:576–581. - https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18287424/
4) Boutris, N., Gardner, S. L., Yetter, T. R.,
Delgado, D. A., Pulido, L., & Harris, J. D. 11) Amjad, A., Hafez, A. T., Nawab Ditta,
(2018). MRI prevalence and characteristics A., & Jan, W. (2020). Synovial Pit of
of supraacetabular fossae in patients with the femoral neck: a rare disease with rare
hip pain. Hip international : the journal of presentations. Journal of surgical case
clinical and experimental research on hip reports, 2020(6), rjaa195. https://doi.org/
pathology and therapy, 28(5), 542–547. 10.1093/jscr/rjaa195
https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700017752566
12) https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/
5) Blankenbaker, D. G., Davis, K. W., De AJR.12.9861
Smet, A. A., & Keene, J. S. (2009). MRI
appearance of the pectinofoveal fold. 13) Randelli, F., Maglione, D., Favilla, S.,
American Journal of Roentgenology, Capitani, P., Menon, A., & Randelli, P.
192(1), 93-95. (2019). Os acetabuli and femoro-acetabular
impingement: aetiology, incidence,
6) BLANKENBAKER, Donna G., et al. treatment, and results. International
MRI appearance of the pectinofoveal fold. orthopaedics, 43(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/
American Journal of Roentgenology, 2009, 10.1007/s00264-018-4151-0
192.1: 93-95
14) Kavanagh, L., Byrne, C., Kavanagh, E.,
7) Philippon M.J., Devitt B.M., Campbell & Eustace, S. (2017). Symptomatic
K.J., et al. Anatomic variance of the synovial herniation pit-MRI appearances
iliopsoas pre and post treatment. BJR case reports,
tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:807– 3(2), 20160103. https://doi.org/10.1259/
811. - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ bjrcr.20160103
24451113/
9 of 10
15) Crompton, T., Lloyd, C., Kokkinakis,
M., & Norman-Taylor, F. (2014). The
prevalence of bifid iliopsoas tendon on
MRI in children. Journal of children’s
orthopaedics, 8(4), 333–336. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0596-x
Images’ references
2) https://radiopaedia.org/cases/supra-
acetabular-fossa
3) https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/
AJR.08.1363
4) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/
s11832-014-0596-x
5) https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/
AJR.12.9861
10 of 10