Hammerdahl, Land, Sorensen, Endicott--Final RM Paper
Hammerdahl, Land, Sorensen, Endicott--Final RM Paper
Hammerdahl, Land, Sorensen, Endicott--Final RM Paper
Jake Land
Lawrence University
Research Methods I
When the Odds Are Against You: The Effects of Purposeful Gratitude and Depressive
People engage in extraordinary levels of dangerous and costly behaviors in which the
odds are statistically against them, such as gambling, alcohol and drug use, smoking, and
unprotected sex. For example, although people in the United States spend over $1000 per
consumer on lottery tickets (US Census Bureau, 2017), research suggests that the odds of
winning the Mega Millions is 1 in about 300 million (Baker, 2019). Every day in the United
States, one person dies from motor-vehicle crashes involving an alcohol impaired driver every 50
minutes (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2016). Such risk-taking behaviors
have the potential for negative physical, social, financial, and mental-health effects, and
increases in the risk of death. Unfortunately, those who cannot afford to take high risks when the
odds are against them are the very people who shouldn’t. In particular, people with pre-existing
mental health complications tend to be at greater likelihood for taking unfounded risks during
Currently, rates of reports of mental health issues, as well as the need for mental health
services, are on the rise (Olfson, 2016). This is apparent specifically in depression and anxiety,
which are categorized as “common mental health” disorders by the World Health Organization
(2017). In fact, the cyclic nature of risk-taking and mental health problems is seen most clearly in
those who suffer from clinical depression. Not only do people who take great risks put them at
great danger of mental health problems, but mental health problems like depression also put
people at greater risk for engaging in risk taking behavior (Soleimani et al., 2017). The present
could be harmed or put in danger by adverse effects. Risk can have the outcome of the loss of
property or material, such as money, or ending up harming the environment. Research suggests
that engagement in patterns of risk-taking behavior may negatively influence processing of risk
information (Brown, 2005). People may engage in riskier behaviors because they do not process
that the behaviors they continuously partake in are risky but instead feel that they are normal.
However, risk-takers display higher risk perceptions than non-risk takers because of their
increased exposure to risk (Brown, 2005). One study found emerging perceptions of lower risk
taking during future risk decisions following successive amounts of risk taking. Such alterations
in perceptions could lead to decreases in feelings of risk taking (Brown, 2005). Some groups of
people are also more likely to partake in risky behaviors or are in more danger if they act in risky
ways. Overall, one’s awareness of their motivations and subsequent behaviors may be impacted
For people with depressive symptoms, risky behavior may be an attempt to resolve the
trans-diagnostic risk factor for various forms of psychopathology, including depression and
anxiety (Nolen- Hoeskema, 1991; for reviews see Nolen-Hoeksema & Watkins, 2011; Nolen-
Hoeksema et al., 2008). Rumination involves repetitive and passive thoughts regarding
distressing symptoms and their possible causes and effects. It exacerbates the effects of negative
mood by limiting cognitive thinking styles, further enhancing negative mood and proposing a
vicious cycle that increases depressive symptoms (Nolen-Hoeskema, 1991). Certain risky
behaviors have also been predictive of or predicted by rumination (e.g., substance abuse and
bulimic symptoms; Nolen-Hoeskema, Stice, Wade, & Bohon, 2007). By increasing negative
affect, rumination exacerbates the presence of negative mood (Lyubomirsky & Nolen-
Hoeksema, 1995), resulting in attentional narrowing, which may further exacerbate negative
mood and increase focus on one’s negative thoughts (Whitmer & Gotlib, 2013). Attempts to
cope with negative affect resulting from rumination may take the form of various risky
behaviors, increasing behaviors like drinking, engaging in unprotected sex, and gambling in an
effort to cope (Nolen-Hoeksema and Harrell, 2002). With a wide variety of negative effects, the
process of rumination and its role in depression presents an important area of investigation.
risky behaviors demonstrates a cyclic problem. Major depression is a common mental disorder
that affects more than 264 million people worldwide (World Health Organization, 2021).
Depression is characterized by persistent sadness and anhedonia, and other common symptoms
include insomnia, loss of appetite, tiredness, and poor concentration (World Health Organization,
2021). The effects of depression can be long-lasting or recurrent and potentially lead to drastic
effects on a person’s functioning (World Health Organization, 2021). Specific research has
aimed to examine the relationship between anxiety and depression with the occurrence of high-
risk behaviors and determine the factors predicting this relationship. Findings suggest that
(Soleimani et al., 2017). For example, one study investigated the relationship between negative
mood, as associated with depression, and compulsive sexual behavior as a risky behavior.
Storholm et. al found a significant positive correlation between compulsive sexual behavior and
depression over a 30-day period (Storholm, Satre, Kapadia, & Halkitis, 2016). Even among
unrepresented samples, the presence of both depression and compulsive sexual behavior further
contributes to elevated sexual risk-taking among a sample of urban young gay and bisexual men
(Storholm, Satre, Kapadia, & Halkitis, 2016). The presence of these behaviors and their
With a presence of risky behaviors across disorders with high rates of comorbidity,
transdiagnostic risk factors remain a critical area of investigation. Research posits that an
exacerbating cause and consequence of depression is repetitive negative thinking (RNT). RNT
broadly refers to the cognitive process of a repetitive focus on negative content that is difficult to
disengage from (Ehring & Wakins, 2008). One form is rumination, which involves repetitive and
passive thoughts about the causes and potential consequences of negative emotions (Nolen-
Hoeksema, 1991). Rumination increases the likelihood of severe depressive symptoms (Nolen-
Hoeksema, 2000) and has been shown to increase negative affect by focusing on one’s negative
mood (Lyubomirsky & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1995). The cyclic nature of negative mood and
rumination (e.g. Lyubomirsky & Tkach, 2004) may correspond to attentional narrowing, which
exacerbates negative mood and further narrows attentional scope by increasing focus on one’s
negative thoughts (Whitmer & Gotlib, 2013). Efforts to decrease one’s negative affect may result
in maladaptive coping behaviors. For example, Gonzales, Reynolds, & Skewes (2011)
investigated the relationships between depressive symptoms, alcohol problems, and drinking to
cope and negative urgency, which are both reactions to negative affect, in a sample of college
students. They found that drinking to cope was a mediator of the relationship between depression
and alcohol problems, suggesting that problematic behavior in depressed individuals may result
from the effects negative affect has on short term decision making. Similarly, elevated
Stice, Wade, & Bohon, 2007; Nolen-Hoesksem and Harrell, 2002) and drinking to cope with
distress (Nolen-Hoeksema and Harrell, 2002). Such maladaptive stress responses may further
increase risk of depressive symptoms, as rumination and negative cognitive content have been
associated with persistent depressive symptoms during life stress (Ciesla, Felton, & Roberts,
2014). These relationships pose a threat to individuals’ mental and physical well-being,
underlying the importance of establishing an intervention that may help to reduce risk taking
behavior and consequently other effects of rumination. In sum, this research suggests that
engaging in rumination, especially for those who are already depressed, may put people at
greater risk for risk-taking behaviors. This leaves unanswered the question of how one might
From the present research, we posit that one possible intervention that may break this
occurs when individuals actively seek out and acknowledge the positive experiences in their
lives (Wood, Froh, & Geraght, 2010). It is a deliberate appreciation for the good things that
happen every day. Engagement in purposeful gratitude may reduce symptoms of depression,
anxiety, rumination, and result in positive overall effects on well-being (Heckendorf, Lehr,
Ebert, & Freund, 2019). Past research demonstrates that gratitude is strongly associated with
one’s well-being. Even across various forms of intentional gratitude (such as listing positive life
events or delivering letters of thanks), there are increases in overall life satisfaction/well-being in
immediate post-tests and in follow-up points (Wood, Froh, & Geraght, 2010). More specifically,
engagement in gratitude has the potential to decrease the negative effects of various mental
alleviating trauma’s effects for those with PTSD (Wood, Froh, & Geraght, 2010). Increases in
well-being may help foster overall positive affect, which would be further assisted by supportive
depression and anxiety immediately post- experiment and in follow-ups (Cregg & Cheavens,
2020), and have been reported to reduce transdiagnostic repetitive negative thinking
(Heckendorf, Lehr, Ebert, & Freund, 2019). Such effects may occur by interrupting the cyclic
nature of rumination.
At its core, gratitude is the practice of disengaging from negative thoughts and shifting
one’s attentional awareness to positive things (Wood, Froh, & Geraght, 2010). Increasing
orientations improved problem solving in depressed patients (Walkins & Baracaia, 2002) and
correspondingly may impact decisions on whether or not to take overly high risks. Similarly, by
increasing mental awareness and disengaging from negative thoughts, gratitude may help to
the negative mood and narrower attention initiated by rumination (Whitmer & Gotlib, 2013). By
allowing for disengagement for negative thoughts and corresponding decreases in rumination,
gratitude may prevent individuals from engaging in risky behaviors, such as substance abuse and
drinking to cope with distress, which have been associated with increases in rumination (Nolen-
Hoeskema, Stice, Wade, & Bohon, 2007; Nolen-Hoesksem and Harrell, 2002). In other words,
by replacing one’s repetitive negative thinking with a focus on what one currently has,
individuals may no longer engage in risky behaviors in order to cope with such negative affect.
This would then help to further break down this cycle and decrease the likelihood of maladaptive
behaviors like engagement in risk-taking. Alleviations in rumination would also possibly account
for results indicating that gratitude serves as a protective factor from stress and depression
(Wood, Maltby, Gillett, Linley & Joseph, 2007). Because rumination and negative cognitive
content have been associated with persistent depressive symptoms during life stress (Ciesla,
Felton, & Roberts, 2014), purposeful gratitude could then serve as a cognitive intervention by
preventing further increases in stress and corresponding maladaptive increases in risky behavior
transdiagnostic protective resource, by removing the desperate motive to experience some form
of positively in a mind flooded with negative thoughts (Heckendorf, Lehr, Ebert, & Freund,
2019).
The present research will test the question of how purposeful gratitude versus rumination
may affect people’s willingness to take risks depending on one’s degree of depressive symptoms.
We hypothesized that in general, individuals with less depressive symptoms will be less likely to
engage in risky behavior compared to those with higher depressive symptoms. When they
engage in purposeful gratitude (as compared to those who engage in “wishful” thinking),
however, those with greater levels of depressive symptoms will report being especially less
likely to report engagement in future risks as compared to their less depressed counterparts.
Methods
Participants
Participants were 36 male and 36 female undergraduate students from a small, Midwest
liberal arts college. They were predominantly between the ages of 18 and 23, and not
compensated for participation in a study investigating “how different forms of daily reflection
affect people’s behaviors”. In the consent form, it was specified that participants
clinical depression should not participate. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three
conditions in a 3 (gratitude: focus on what one has, control, focus on what doesn’t have) x 2
(depressive symptoms: high vs low) between-subjects design, with risk taking behavior as the
Procedure
Participants received an email which included their participant number and 3 different
links. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition through their corresponding participant
number, with numbers in the 100’s, 200’s, and 300’s being assigned in order of participant
enrollment. The first number in each participant number corresponded to the first, second, and
third links, respectively. Clicking on the respective link brought participants to a Google Form
journaling responses were not recorded. Following this, participants were instructed to complete
an approximately 10-minute survey. Participant responses were recorded but will remain
confidential.
research defines gratitude as a positive emotional reaction and appreciation for something that is
meaningful to oneself. For our study, we defined purposeful gratitude as someone intentionally
focusing on the good things in one’s life and thinking about what they are grateful to have. By
instructing participants to focus only on what they are “grateful for”, we intended to prompt the
participant to intentionally reflect and consider their feelings towards the positive aspects in their
life. In contrast, participants in the opposing group were asked to focus on “unwanted
consequences” and therefore dwell on the things they wish they did not have or may be lacking.
For the control condition, we instructed participants to reflect on what comes to mind naturally,
helping to prompt a reflective, but unguided state. All participants were instructed to reflect, in
the same manner and same duration, specifically on the events of the last year, with the only
differences being the specific focus of their reflection. To manipulate whether participants
presented with one of the following based on random assignment. Prompt responses are to be
journaled in the participants preferred method (i.e. handwritten, electronically, etc). For those
“For a minimum of 5 minutes, please purposefully reflect on your life experience within
the past 24 hours. Consider all aspects of past events, focusing on those to which come to mind
naturally. You are free to continue writing after 5 minutes if you please.”
For those assigned to the purposeful gratitude condition, they were asked: “For a
minimum of 5 minutes, please purposefully reflect on your life experience within the past year.
Consider all aspects of past events, focusing only on those for which you are grateful for. You
Finally for those in the purposeful wishing condition, they were prompted: “For a
minimum of 5 minutes, please purposefully reflect on your life experience within the past year.
Consider all aspects of past events, focusing only on those which had unwanted consequences.
Participants were asked to reflect upon events within the past year to both limit the
potential overwhelming nature of reflecting on one’s entire life, but also allow enough flexibility
to consider a variety of past events. The journaling task was a self-directed task, and responses
further directed to the same survey measuring our primary dependent measures and the
participant variable of depressive symptoms. All survey question responses, including questions
regarding participant’s age, biological sex, and ethnicity were recorded, but participant names
responded to a survey that assessed their willingness to engage in risk-taking behaviors. The
questions were assessed on a Likert scale of 0 (not at all likely) to 4 (extremely likely). The
questions were adapted from the “Reckless Behavior Questionnaire”, a 10-item inventory
focused on assessing the likelihood of engaging in behaviors with the potential for immediate or
dire negative consequences (Arnett, 1989). Examples of risk-taking behaviors included the use of
marijuana and cocaine, driving under the influence, and sex without contraception. Some
questions were modified to more holistically and thoroughly encompass drug and alcohol use
and compulsive sexual behavior. For example, we asked questions about the likelihood to
“consume illegal & potentially harmful substances (ex: marijuana, cocaine, etc.)” and “seek out
casual sexual relations”. These focuses align with past research suggesting that elevated
rumination is correlated with increased substance abuse (Nolen-Hoeskema, Stice, Wade, &
Bohon, 2007; Nolen-Hoesksem and Harrell, 2002) and it’s negative effects may result in risky
behavior in the form drinking to cope (Nolen-Hoeksema and Harrell, 2002). In addition,
correlations between compulsive sexual behavior and depression have been found (Storholm,
Satre, Kapadia, & Halkitis, 2016). A set of questions was included to address gambling and other
high risk, high reward behaviors (e.g. skydiving, ziplining, etc.) as these questions were not
addressed in the original scale and are meant to encompass risk taking behaviors in which the
odds are against the participant. See Appendix A for the full list of behaviors and full scale.
The survey also assessed their trait levels of depression using the Beck Depression
Inventory (Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961). This inventory includes 21
clusters with 4 statements each in which participants are instructed to select a statement that best
describes how they Feel. For example, they had to select one description from a group of
statements such as “I do not feel sad.”/”I feel sad.”/”I am sad all the time and can't snap out of
it.”/”I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it.”(See Appendix B for full list of question
clusters).
The last five items on the questionnaire were designed to specifically measure
participants levels of rumination. Participants were provided the following instructions: “People
think and do many different things when they feel sad, blue, or depressed. Please tell me if you
never, sometimes, often, or always think or do each one when you feel down, sad, or depressed.
Please indicate what you generally do, not what you think you should do” (Nolen-Hoeksema et
al., 1999). These five items were copied from Brooding subscale developed by Treyner et al.
“Often” and 4= “Almost Always”). This particular scale was employed as it is considered to
represent the more maladaptive aspects of rumination and eliminates potential overlap with
symptoms, we performed a median split on the depression inventory. Participants were then
We hypothesized that, in general, individuals with less depressive symptoms will be less
likely to engage in risky behavior compared to those with higher depressive symptoms. When
they engage in purposeful gratitude (as compared to those who engage in “wishful” thinking),
however, those with greater levels of depressive symptoms will report being especially less
likely to report engagement in future risks as compared to their less depressed counterparts. We
plan to conduct a 3 (Journaling Task: Focus on what one is grateful for, focus on what one does
not have, focus on all aspects of life/control) X 2 (Level of Depressive Symptoms: High, Low)
Risk Taking
We hypothesized that individuals with less depressive symptoms will be less likely to
engage in risky behavior compared to those with higher depressive symptoms. When they
engage in purposeful gratitude (as compared to those who engage in “wishful” thinking),
however, those with greater levels of depressive symptoms will report being especially less
likely to report engagement in future risks as compared to their less depressed counterparts.
Hypothesized means appear in Figure 1. If the data supports our hypothesis, ANOVA would
reveal an interaction such that across both low levels and high levels of depression, those who
participated in gratitude would express lower levels of risk taking compared to the control group,
while those who participated in rumination would express higher levels of risk taking, though the
effect would be much greater for those expressing high levels of depression. In sum, we expected
to find that those with higher levels of depression would experience greater changes in risk
taking levels, such that those participating in gratitude would have marked decreases in risk
taking while those who participated in the rumination condition would have marked increase in
risk taking. Participants with lower levels of depression would experience the same changes but
to a lesser degree.
Discussion
Assuming results consistent with our predictions, participants with higher levels of
depression would experience an increase in risk taking when in the rumination condition, but
would experience a decrease in risk taking in the gratitude conditions. Participants with lower
levels of depression would also experience this change in risk taking, only to a lesser degree. Our
Our results are consistent with past research. For those with higher levels of depression,
gratitude interventions may have provided individuals with a better method of coping with
see Nolen-Hoeksema & Watkins, 2011; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008) and involves repetitive
and passive thoughts regarding distressing symptoms and their possible causes and effects
(Nolen-Hoeskema, 1991). It often exacerbates the presence of negative mood (Lyubomirsky &
Nolen-Hoeksema, 1995), resulting in attentional narrowing, which may further cause negative
mood and increase focus on one’s negative thoughts, (Whitmer & Gotlib, 2013) and therefore
increase depressive symptoms. The cyclic nature between negative affect and rumination has
been associated with methods of coping lead such as increased behaviors like drinking, engaging
in unprotected sex, and gambling to cope (Nolen-Hoeksema and Harrell, 2002). In our study, we
found that for individuals who were in the control group for the journal task, and therefore
should experience little change in depressive symptoms as a result, those who had higher levels
of depressive symptoms also had higher levels of risk taking compared to those in the low level
of depressive symptoms group. This would indicate that for those with higher levels of
depression, and therefore higher levels of rumination, engagement in risk taking behaviors may
serve as maladaptive coping styles meant to decrease levels of negative affect despite increased
For those who completed the journaling task in which they were reflecting on the things
they are grateful for, they were engage in purposeful gratitude. Purposeful gratitude occurs when
individuals actively seek out and acknowledge the positive experiences in their lives and focuses
on the practice of disengaging from negative thoughts and shifting one’s attentional awareness to
positive things (Wood, Froh, & Geraght, 2010). The journaling task may have then provided
participants with a means of disengaging from the negative cycle of rumination, preventing the
need for coping mechanisms in the form of risk-taking behavior, such as increased substance
abuse and drinking to cope with distress, which have previously been associated with elevated
rumination scores (Nolen-Hoeskema, Stice, Wade, & Bohon, 2007; Nolen-Hoeksema and
Harrell, 2002). For participants with higher levels of depression who were instructed to focus on
what they don’t have, their task of focusing on such negative events and their possible causes
and effects reflects similar behaviors characteristic of rumination. As a result, participants may
have experienced increases in negative affect and correspondingly levels of depression and
therefore explaining increases in observed risk taking in this group. A similar pattern of changes
in risk-taking behavior but to a lesser degree in participants with lower levels of depression can
Our inability to run this study represents a particularly important limitation to this
research. Other potential limitations include our experimental design, which focused solely on
the effects of depressive symptoms and gratitude in the form of a journaling task on risk-taking
behavior as the dependent variable. Other dependent variables, such as participant’s affect levels,
and other moderator variables would help to directly investigate the relationship between
negative affect and rumination, which we proposed as crucial components to the cycle leading to
increases in risk taking behavior. A further limitation is the duration of our study. Individuals
were instructing to complete a 5-minute journaling task, preventing us from investigating any
long-term effects. A long-term study using a repeated journaling task over a longer period, such
as a week or two weeks, may yield stronger results. Also, the nature of the journaling task itself,
such as its length and method (e.g. verbally, spoken to another person, etc.) could be
investigated.
Future research should seek to replicate our findings by performing a long-term study in
which participants do this journaling task over an extended period rather than just a singular test.
Additionally, future research should explore the effect of the journaling manipulation and levels
of depression on other variables (e.g., how people are feeling immediately post-experiment, etc.).
Other interventions that could be examined in future research could focus on how participants
levels of depressive symptoms change over time when participating in this journaling task.
particularly risky activities. Our study shows that people who expressed gratitude, whether they
have higher or lower levels of depressive symptoms, were less likely to take risks post-
experiment than those who were ruminating. People who did ruminate, however, were more
likely to perform risky behaviors post-experiment across higher or lower levels of depressive
symptoms. Therefore, one promising avenue to combat the urge to behave in riskier ways may
be to practice gratitude frequently and focus on the positive aspects in life that one is grateful
for.
Appendix A
For each of the following questions please indicate how likely you are to engage in the following
behaviors. Use the following scale when responding:
0= Not at all likely
1= Somewhat likely
2= Likely
3= Very likely
4= Extremely likely
Appendix B
For each cluster of questions, check on the one statement that best reflects how you feel.
I feel sad.
I feel that the future is hopeless and that things cannot improve.
I expect to be punished.
I am disappointed in myself.
I hate myself.
I have thoughts of killing myself, but I would not carry them out.
I don't get irritated at all by the things that used to irritate me.
I feel that there are permanent changes in my appearance that make me look unattractive.
I wake up 1-2 hours earlier than usual and I find it hard to get back to sleep.
I wake up several hours earlier than I used to and cannot get back to sleep.
I am worried about physical problems such as aches and pains; or upset stomach; or constipation.
I am very worried about physical problems and it's hard to think of much else.
I am so worried about my physical problems that I cannot think of anything else.
Appendix C
People think and do many different things when they feel sad, blue, or depressed. Please
tell me if you never, sometimes, often, or always think or do each one when you feel down, sad,
or depressed. Please indicate what you generally do, not what you think you should do.
References
Baker, E. (2019, May 04). Which lotteries have the best odds?. Retrieved from:
https://www.casino.org/blog/lottery-odds/.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X36703
Ciesla, J. A., Felton, J. W., & Roberts, J. E. (2011). Testing the cognitive catalyst model of
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.543330
Ehring, T., & Watkins, E. R. (2008). Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic process.
https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2008.1.3.192
Gonzalez, J., Field, T., Yando, R., & Gonzalez, K. (1994). Adolescents' perceptions of their
Gonzalez, V. M., Reynolds, B., & Skewes, M. C. (2011). Role of impulsivity in the relationship
between depression and alcohol problems among emerging adult college drinkers.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022720
Heckendorf, H., Lehr, D., Ebert, D. D., & Freund, H. (2019). Efficacy of an internet and
app-based gratitude intervention in reducing repetitive negative thinking and mechanisms
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2016 data:
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.504
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Harrell, Z. A. (2002). Rumination, depression, and alcohol use: Tests of
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Stice, E., Wade, E., & Bohon, C. (2007). Reciprocal relations between
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.198
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination.
6924.2008.00088.x
models
Olfson, M. (2016). The rise of primary care physicians in the provision of US mental health care.
583. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3620821
Soleimani, M. A., Pahlevan Sharif, S., Bahrami, N., Yaghoobzadeh, A., Allen, K. A., &
Mohammadi, S. (2017). The relationship between anxiety, depression and risk behaviors
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2016-0148
Storholm, E. D., Satre, D. D., Kapadia, F., & Halkitis, P. N. (2016). Depression, Compulsive
Sexual Behavior, and Sexual Risk-Taking Among Urban Young Gay and Bisexual Men:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0566-5
Watkins, E. D., & Baracaia, S. (2002). Rumination and social problem-solving in depression.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00098-5
Whitmer, A. J., & Gotlib, I. H. (2013). An attentional scope model of rumination. Psychological
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in
the development of social support, stress, and depression: Two longitudinal studies.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003
World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global