editor,+7_412_Olga+Robertovna+Fayzullina_87-98
editor,+7_412_Olga+Robertovna+Fayzullina_87-98
editor,+7_412_Olga+Robertovna+Fayzullina_87-98
†
Kazan Federal University
*
Corresponding Author, Email: [email protected]
© 2019 Fayzullina. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fayzullina. Space and Culture, India 2019, 6:5 Page | 88
The practical process of the adaptation includes not just problems and barriers but opportunities
culture shock, which is necessary for further for novel activity and personal growth”
social interaction and friendship development, (Marginson, 2014:6-8). Psychologically, it is of
even trying to find some cultural similarities great importance to construct a positive
(Gareis 2012; Williams and Johnson 2011). All of attitude to the adaptation issues and to
these components support the formation of perceive them as challenges rather than
their inter-cultural communication competence difficulties. The concept of "challenge"
as well as other professional competencies, should have a positive connotation.
which leads to inter-cultural friendship and Undergoing adaptation challenges,
relational identity (Belford, 2017; Biserova and international students form their hybrid
Shagivaleeva , 2019; Khenner, 2018; Trede et al., identity and agency freedom (Marginson,
2013). 2014; Volet and Jones, 2012). In the process of
self-formation, it is better not to underestimate
There are two types of transitional experience:
the role of agency in international students’
maturation and human development, and
sociocultural adaptation.
intercultural adaptation. The transition is a
complex phenomenon which synthesises linear Thus, the aims of this research were as follows:
inter-cultural adaptation and a set of shifting to consider the issue of international
associations between language mastery, social students’ adaptation;
interaction, personal development and to reveal the current challenges and
academic outcomes (Gural and Pavlenko, 2011; strategies of inter-cultural integration;
Gu et al., 2010). to create and to assess the effectivity of
Generally, three styles of adaptation are educational space for students’
considered in the literature. They are positive interaction called the Club of
and connected, unconnected and stressed, and International Friendship (CIF) “UNITY!”.
distressed and risk-taking (Russell et al., 2010; Methods
Hoang and Tran, 2018; Tran, 2011).
Participants
The relevance of the adaptation study is obvious
worldwide. Sometimes acculturative stress and For this research, 207 international students,
difficulties with adjustment to the environment aged 17 – 32, had taken part in our
of the host country are inevitable. Acculturative questionnaire survey. The breakdown is as
stresses are language barriers, educational follows:
challenges, loneliness, discrimination and 107 (55, 2%) – male students,
practical problems associated with changing 100 (44, 8%) – female students.
environments (Smith and Khawaja, 2011). st
According to other research findings "the most Theirthyear of study ranges from the 1 year to
significant acculturative stressors are a linguistic the 4 year. The international students are from
adaptation, social network, political Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Tajikistan.
identification and discrimination" (Yu et al., One hundred thirty-four students have come
2016: 300-315). from Turkmenistan, 31 from Uzbekistan, 25 from
Tajikistan, and 17 from Iran. Kazan Federal
Nevertheless, in the era of globalisation when University served as a platform for creating a
we speak about “never finished cultural club, as the number of international students
negotiation”, “international education offers continues to increase every year.
Fayzullina. Space and Culture, India 2019, 6:5 Page | 90
They want to be teachers and to study two because it is small, still the majority consider that
foreign languages: English and Russian that is the town is beautiful, and they like the institute
why they have come to our town to get a higher with its rich history. They find it difficult to get
education. The special atmosphere of a small accustomed to the incomprehensibility of the
town helps them concentrate on their study, and language (they mean the Russian language) and
psychologically it is i more comfortable to start to the climate, of course. The common problems
an independent life far from home and parents that they face are the language barrier (43.3 %),
in such surroundings. Though some of the social and living conditions (17.9%), and
international students do not like the town, document issues (13.4%).
Fayzullina. Space and Culture, India 2019, 6:5 Page | 92
Though they feel homesick (17.9 %), the good one (70. 1 %) and excellent (13. 4 %) (Figure
international students have a positive attitude to 6). Students consider Russia as an international
their life and study and express their happiness country and Russian as an international
(62.7 %) (Figure 4). The majority of the students language. The reason is that mostly they come
(84 %) have local friends (Figure 5). They from former Soviet Republics.
characterise their education environment as a
Development”. Journal of International research in Eastern Siberia and the Far East
Students 7(3): 499-521. 3: 98-100.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.569941. Gu, Q., M. Schweisfurth, C. Day. 2010. “Learning
Biserova G.K., G.R.Shagivaleeva. 2019. “Socio- and growing in a foreign context: inter-
Psychological Adaptation of International cultural experiences of international
Students to Learning and Professional students”. Compare: A Journal of
Activities.”Journal Space and Culture, India Comparative & International Education
6(5), 99-114. 40(1): 7-23.
https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i5.411 https://doi.org/10.1080/030579209031159
83.
Brisset, С., S. Safdar, J. Rees Lewis, C. Sabatier.
2010. “Psychological and sociocultural Gural, S.K., E.I. Pavlenko. 2011. “Formation of
adaptation of university students in France: the multicultural multilingual personality of
The case of Vietnamese international a new type through a third foreign
students”. International Journal of Inter- language”. Language and Culture 2 (14):
cultural Relations 34(4): 413-426. 115-120.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.02.0 Hayes, A. 2017. “Teaching Excellence
09. Framework in the UK: an opportunity to
Ecochard, S., J. Fotheringham. 2017. include international students as 'equals'?”
“International Students’ Unique Challenges Journal of Studies in International Education
– Why Understanding International 21(5): 483-497.
Transitions to Higher Education Matters”. Hendrickson, B., D. Rosen, R.K. Aune. 2011. “An
Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Analysis of Friendship Networks, Social
Practice: Edinburgh Napier University, UK Connectedness, Homesickness, and
5(2): 100–108. Satisfaction Levels of International
Emelyanova, T.V. 2016. Peculiarities of teaching Students”. International Journal of Inter-
legal English in multinational groups. 7th cultural Relations 35(3): 281-295.
International Conference on Inter-cultural https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.08.0
Education “Education, Health and ICT for a 01.
Transcultural World”: Social and Behavioral Hernandez, T.A. 2010. “The Relationship Among
Sciences (pp. 1494-1499). EDUHEM, Motivation, Interaction, and the
Almeria, Spain. Development of Second Language Oral
Fayzullina, O.R. 2017. Effective engagement Proficiency”. Study‐Abroad Context Modern
and interaction in poly-lingual educational Language Journal 94(4): 600-617.
space. Teacher education for Changing Hoang, T., L.T. Tran. 2018. Understanding
World: III International Forum on Teacher international students' adaptation
Education: Part 2 (pp. 231-233). Kazan: motivation and behaviours: transformative,
Otechestvo. strategic, or conservative? Educational
Gareis, E. 2012. “Inter-cultural Friendship: reciprocity and adaptability: International
Effects of Home and Host Region”. Journal students and stakeholders. New York:
of International and Inter-cultural Routledge.
Communication 5(4): 309-328. International student table 2017: top 200
https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2012.69 universities. Retrieved from:
1525. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/st
Grebennikova, I.A. 2011. “The process of udent/best-universities/international-
adaptation of international students: the student-table-2017-top-200-universities.
mechanism and key factors”. Humanitarian Access date: 02 January 2018.
Fayzullina. Space and Culture, India 2019, 6:5 Page | 96
Kazun, A.P., L.S. Pastukhova. 2018. “The Marginson, S. 2014. “Student Self-Formation”.
practices of project-based learning International Education Journal of Studies in
technique application: experience of International Education 18(1): 6-22.
different countries”. The Education and Marquis, E., R. Guitman, C. Black, M. Healey,
science journal 20(2): 32-59. (In Russ.). K.E. Matthews, L.S. Dvorakova. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018- “Growing partnership communities: What
2-32-59. experiences of an international institute
Khenner, E.K. 2018. “Professional knowledge suggest about developing student-staff
and professional competencies in higher partnership in higher
education”. The Education and science education”. Innovations in Education and
journal 20(2): 9-31. (In Russ.). Teaching International 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2018- https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.14
2-9-31. 24012.
Lee, J.Y., A. Ciftci. 2014. “Asian international Mikheeva, N.F. 2011. “Modern approaches to
students’ socio-cultural adaptation: the development of Russian education as a
Influence of multicultural personality, multicultural, poly-lingual space”.
assertiveness, academic self-efficacy, and Education: languages and speciality 2: 63-
social support”. International Journal of 67.
Intercultural Relations 38: 97-105. Modnov, S.I., L.V. Ukhova. 2013. “Problems of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.08.0 adaptation of international students
09. studying at the Technical University”.
Leutwyler, B., C. Meierhans. 2016. “Effects of Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin 1(2): 111-
international student exchange on pre- 115.
service teachers: a quasi-experimental Montgomery, C. 2010 Understanding the
study”. International Education 27 (2): 117-
international student experience (pp. 184).
136. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.11
44713. Mosienko, L.V., G.Kh. Khazhgalieva. 2016.
“Value bases of self-determination of
Liyanage, I., L. Tran, A. Ata. 2018. “Re- students in poly-lingual education”. Bulletin
examining reciprocity in international of Orenburg State University 2 (190): 39-45.
education”. Educational reciprocity and
adaptivity: International students and Munthe, E. 2017 Teacher Education for a Global
stakeholders (pp. 3-22). London: Routledge. Future. A mosaic of cultures: building a
more inclusive future (pp. 43-48). EAIE.
Lomer, S. 2018. “Adaptation for national
competitive advantage: policy on Rienties, B., N. Eimear-Marie. 2014.
international students in the UK”. “Understanding friendship and learning
Educational reciprocity and adaptability: networks of international and host students
International students and stakeholders. using longitudinal Social Network Analysis”.
New York: Routledge. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations 41: 165-180.
Marginson, S. 2012. “Equals or Others? Mobile http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013
students in a nationally bordered world, in .12.003.
S. Sovic and M. Blythman (eds.)”
International Students Negotiating Higher Rienties, B., S. Beausaert, T. Grohnert, S.
Education: Critical perspectives (pp. 9-27). Niemantsverdriet, P. Kommers. 2012.
London: Routledge. “Understanding academic performance of
international students: the role of ethnicity,
academic and social integration”. Higher
Fayzullina. Space and Culture, India 2019, 6:5 Page | 97
5. Number of years you have been in Elabuga 11. Characterise your education environment
(multiple choice)
6. Your reason to study at Elabuga Institute of
Kazan Federal University o Excellent
o Good
7. What have you got used to quickly and easily
o Satisfactory
in the town and in the institute?
o Bad
8. What things do you find difficult to get
accustomed to in the town and in the institute? 12. Do you have local friends?
9. Your first impressions of the country, the 13. How do you spend your free time in Elabuga?
town, and the institute. What did you feel? 14. What do you feel now? (multiple choice)
10. What problems are you facing now, if any? o Loneliness
(multiple choice) o Homesick
o Satisfaction
o culture barrier
o Tiredness
o language barrier
o Happiness
o social and living conditions
o Your variant
o document issues
o your variant 15. Do you like living and studying in Russia?
Why?