ASSIGNMENTpsych220 (2)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

ASSIGNMENT

TITLE: Quiz 2

DATE: 30-11-24

NAME: Amna Latif

INSTRUCTOR: Ma’am Mahnoor Ali

COURSE: PSYCH220
Develop a hypothesis of your choice. Then, collect a dataset consisting of two groups (a
minimum of ten cases for each group) and conduct an independent samples T-test analysis on
SPSS. Afterward, write a report detailing your results (APA 7th edition), including a table and a
bar chart to illustrate your findings.

Hypothesis:
Hypothesis: Students who study in a quiet environment will perform better on a standardized
memory recall test compared to students who study in a noisy environment.

Null Hypothesis (H₀): There is no significant difference in memory recall scores between
students in quiet and noisy study environments.
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): There is a significant difference in memory recall scores between
students in quiet and noisy study environments.
Dataset:
I will create a hypothetical dataset representing scores of 20 participants, divided into two
groups:
Group 1 (Quiet Environment): 10 participants.
Group 2 (Noisy Environment): 10 participants.
Data for analysis:
Quiet Environment (Group 1): [12, 15, 14, 13, 16, 17, 14, 18, 15, 16]
Noisy Environment (Group 2): [9, 11, 10, 8, 12, 10, 11, 9, 10, 8]

Analysis Plan:
The analysis will be conducted using an Independent Samples T-test in SPSS to determine if
there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups
Group Statistics:
Quiet environment: Mean = 15.00, SD = 1.826
Noisy environment: Mean = 9.80, SD = 1.317
These match the descriptive statistics in my report.
Independent Samples Test:
T-value = 7.305 (Equal variances assumed)
p-value (Sig. 2-tailed) < 0.001
Mean difference = 5.20, with a confidence interval of [3.705, 6.695]
These values match the t-test result I calculated.
Effect Sizes:
Cohen's d = 1.592 (very large effect size), which emphasizes the substantial difference between
the two groups.
REPORT:
Descriptive Statistics
The study compared the memory recall scores of participants who studied in a quiet environment
to those who studied in a noisy environment.

Environment N Mean Standard Deviation


Quiet 10 15.00 1.826
Environment
Noisy 10 9.80 1.317
Environment

Participants in the quiet environment scored higher (M = 15.00, SD = 1.83) on average compared
to those in the noisy environment (M = 9.80, SD = 1.32).

Independent Samples T-test


To test whether the difference in memory recall scores between the two groups was statistically
significant, an independent samples T-test was conducted. The test assumed equal variances
(Levene’s test: F = 0.768, p = .392). The results showed a significant difference between the
groups, t(18) = 7.31, p < .001. This indicates that participants in the quiet environment performed
significantly better on the memory recall task compared to those in the noisy environment. The
mean difference between the groups was 5.20 (95% CI [3.705, 6.695]).

Effect Sizes
The results also included effect sizes, showing the strength of the difference between the groups.
Cohen’s d was 1.59, indicating a very large effect size. This confirms that the quiet study
environment had a substantial positive effect on memory recall compared to the noisy
environment.

Discussion
The results support the hypothesis that studying in a quiet environment leads to better memory
recall compared to studying in a noisy environment. The findings are both statistically significant
and practically meaningful, as indicated by the large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.59). These
findings highlight the importance of creating a quiet study setting to maximize performance on
tasks requiring memory.

You might also like