culture.and.computing.2015.34
culture.and.computing.2015.34
culture.and.computing.2015.34
Abstract—Recent developments in information and communi- William Logan [5] defines intangible heritage as “heritage that
cation technology have advanced the connectivity of cities, both in is embodied in people rather than in inanimate objects.” This
terms of scope and efficiency. The connected nature of a city is one includes stories, dance, rituals, and other human behaviour.
of the key characteristics of the concept of a smart city; a modern
city whose urban growth is fuelled by technology, infrastructure,
and an emphasis on social and educational capital. Such growth We are of the mind that cultures change for a reason, and
affects the physical and social landscape of a city, and both the if certain groups of people discard or alter their practices it
tangible and intangible heritage of a city is threatened by these should not be prevented. Yet, we are largely unaware of the
changing landscapes. At the same time, new technology brings
consequences for heritage when we are busy with rapidly
potential new methods for the preservation of a city’s threatened
heritage. The present paper aims to place a city’s heritage in the changing the urban spaces into smart and optimised spaces.
context of a smart city, and how it is affected by such urban
development. Using the preservation of World War II heritage This paper explores the concept of smart cities and the
in Aalborg, Denmark as a case study, this paper presents a way impact they have on the preservation of a city’s tangible
to use recent advancements in mobile technology to allow users
and intangible heritage. Several examples of preservation are
experience stories that comprise a city’s heritage at the locations
in the urban environment where they took place. detailed before another possible solution to the problem at
hand is outlined, which takes the form of a location-based
I. I NTRODUCTION smartphone application. This application guides the user to
Historical and cultural artefacts are often prioritised and points of interest in the urban space, where the user can then
preserved in contemporary communities; city archives, experience audio stories related to the historical and cultural
museums, and libraries that keep and maintain records, heritage of that particular location. The methods and results
history, artwork and other artefacts exist in most large explained before the paper concludes. The first test is con-
population centres. Individual buildings such as churches or cerned with how best to present the stories that comprise the
very old structures may not only house such aforementioned heritage in the urban environment. From the results of this test,
artefacts, but are artefacts in and of themselves. However, audio was chosen as the preferred method of presentation. In
as Giovannella et al. [4] point out, these specific locations order to measure the experience of being presented the stories
in a city that comprise its heritage are often isolated from in the urban space, the second test compares the emergence
the rest of the city. Not necessarily physically, but they exist of spatial presence between users who experienced the audio
as separate places that dictate specific behaviours, such as stories in a museum context and those who experienced the
a museum tour or a visit to the interior of an old church. same stories at the locations where they took place. The results
Moreover, the heritage preserved is often taken out of context, of this test were ultimately insignificant.
placed inside a building, often behind an entry fee, in an
arbitrary collection where meaning may be lost. It is clear II. S MART C ITIES
that the technology dictates not only how tangible heritage The concept of a smart city has emerged in recent years,
is traditionally preserved, but also how humans interact with especially with advances in information and communication
it. This is an example of McLuhan’s [6] theory that the technology (ICT) and the rise of urban digital media. It
technology that humans create in turn affects our behaviour. is a concept that brings both challenges and opportunities
In this case the technology dictates specific behaviour for for a city’s urban space. We encourage both a discourse
interacting with cultural heritage, such as the viewing of on preserving and presenting a city’s heritage based on the
artefacts in a museum. As technology rapidly advances, infrastructure and connectivity of the smart city. Smart cities
opportunities for new methods of preserving tangible heritage encompass many aspects of the modern city, and the concept
arise. is used to describe modern urban growth. In particular
smart cities emphasise urban development in the areas of
It is not only the preservation of tangible heritage that can economics, politics, culture, and society. This development
benefit from new technology, but also the intangible heritage. is spurred on by ICT and infrastructure such as housing,
184
order to keep pace with advancements in ICT. The application were asked to complete a recognition memory test for each of
this paper presents also differs from new museum or city the stories. The results of the memory test were then grouped
tours in that it uses a GPS system along with the gyroscope to by presentation method and compared to each other in order
place the preservation of the heritage in a new context. This to find out if there was a significant difference between the
method of navigation in turn promotes exploration of a city, presentation methods.
a method of urban interaction which could potentially expose
B. Findings from the Presentation of Media Test
users to previously unexplored spaces and places, which may
hold tangible and intangible heritage of their own. The findings from the quantitative analysis indicated that
there were no significant difference between the methods.
Table I shows the final aggregate scores from the recognition
VI. I MPLEMENTATION AND T ESTING memory test, revealing no immediately obvious differences.
Two tests were conducted during the creation of the While AR (method D) is a good way to visualise the stories
application. The first test involved 32 participants and in a complementary fashion, audio was found to serve just
investigated different media presentation methods in the as well. An audio approach was chosen as the medium for
urban context. The second test was a preliminary test to presenting the stories and the prototype redesigned according
measure the emergence of spatial presence in 20 participants, to these findings.
who were either exposed to the media in a museum context,
sum mean variance sd
or in the urban context. Both test presented the media to A 114 3.56 5.16 2.27
participants through an Android application. B 115 3.59 3.41 1.85
C 110 3.44 3.16 1.78
D 94 2.94 3.29 1.81
TABLE I
A. Presentation of Media T OTAL SCORE OF MEMORY TEST BY METHOD .
The first stage of the process was to investigate the technical
approaches to the presentation of the media in the urban
context. The test was conducted in order to discover which C. Presence
was the most viable method of preservation of the heritage
The second test investigated if there was a significant
content (WWII stories) at the location where they took place.
difference in the emergence of spatial presence between two
The test investigated four different methods, comparing them
groups of participants listening to four WWII related stories.
to each other through results from a recognition memory test,
Each group consisted of 10 participants. The first group of
and through observations. The four methods were as follows:
participants (Group 1) was presented the application with
• Text only (A)
the stories in a museum context, and the second group of
• Audio only (B)
participants (Group 2) was presented with the application in
• Still images and Audio (C)
the city, where they had to navigate to the right location in
• Augmented reality and Audio (see figure 2) (D)
order to hear the stories. Spatial presence is, of course, but
32 participants were involved in this within-subjects study. one way to measure the effect of transferring the preserved
Each of the participants experienced each of the four methods heritage from a museum setting to the urban environment.
with one of four stories related to WWII. In order to coun- A spatial presence questionnaire was created specifically for
terbalance the experiment, Graeco-Latin squares were used so this between-subjects study, which measures the emergence of
that each possible pairing of presentation method and story spatial presence among the participants. After the participants
was used an equal number of times during the test. After being had experienced all four stories, they were asked to fill out
presented with all the stories at their locations, the participants the questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of statements,
with the participants indicating how much they agreed with
the statements on a scale from 1 to 5. Results of 4 and above
were considered as an indication of the emergence of spatial
presence. The results from the questionnaire were compared
between the two groups.
D. Findings from the Presence Test
The results of the quantitative analysis showed that there
were no significant differences in the emergence of spatial
presence between the two groups. Table VI-D shows the
scores of the presence questionnaire for each individual
participant in both groups, with a higher score indication
Fig. 2. An example of AR showing a door which is no longer a part of the
greater emergence of spatial presence. It can be seen from the
building. The door is a prop in the story that was presented to the user at this table that both groups are almost equal. Observations during
particular site during testing. the test included: Participants looked at the phone the majority
185
of the time while navigating while the opposite was true used by more than one participant at a time. Participants
while listening to the stories. Higher amount of enthusiasm unexpectedly seemed to become more engrossed in the task
and collaboration in the cases where such collaboration was of navigating, as well as in the content. They often discussed
possible. which way to go and what they knew of Churchill-Klubben.
An interesting approach to a redesign of the application could
Group 1 Group 2
be to cater more towards a social experience.
Participant No. Score Participant No. Score
1 2 1 3
2 4 2 6 VIII. C ONCLUSION
3 2 3 4
4 5 4 4
In conclusion, the application is a promising start in the
5 4 5 4 development of a new method which transfers the preservation
6 1 6 3 of a city’s heritage from relative isolation in museums and
7 6 7 4
8 3 8 4
archives to the more accessible, wider urban environment.
9 4 9 2 The method is achieved through the connected nature and
10 6 10 4 new technology and infrastructure of the smart city, a concept
Total Score 37 Total Score 38 that at once rapidly reconfigures the physical space of the
TABLE II
TABLES DETAILING THE SCORES SHOWING THE EMERGENCE OF S PATIAL city, while at the same time providing possibilities for new
P RESENCE ATTRIBUTED TO EACH PARTICIPANT FOR EACH GROUP approaches to the preservation of heritage. While the early
prototype test shows promise, the challenge that awaits is to
more effectively layer the new media of the smart city on
VII. D ISCUSSION top of what already exists in the urban environment and to
find ways to incorporate content that are not already found in
The findings from the first test showed minimal difference books.
between the presentation methods. It could be argued that the
novelty of AR would attract a larger audience than an audio
presentation method. However, AR is more resource-intensive ACKNOWLEDGMENT
than audio, which could be authored by people other than The authors would like to express their gratitude to the
the developer. AR requires markers throughout the city. They people who agreed to participate in the tests and to those who
require a certain kind of lighting, and this limits the time of provided feedback for the prototypes. We also wish to thank
day the AR is usable. AR can still be a useful method of Visit Aalborg and Nordkraft Event for their cooperation.
presentation of heritage in some cases. A historical site may
have been completely obliterated by urban development, and R EFERENCES
an audio story at such a site could benefit from a visualisation. [1] Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority. 2015. Audio Tour.
(2015). http://www.portarthur.org.au/index.aspx?id=22605
[2] Michael Batty, Kay W Axhausen, Fosca Giannotti, Alexei Pozdnoukhov,
As has been discussed at the end of section VI-D, the Armando Bazzani, Monica Wachowicz, Georgios Ouzounis, and Yuval
second test yielded a positive surprise when it was observed Portugali. 2012. Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal-
Special Topics 214, 1 (2012), 481.
how the social dynamics played out once the application was [3] Andrea Caragliu, Chiara Del Bo, and Peter Nijkamp. 2011. Smart cities
in Europe. Journal of urban technology 18, 2 (2011), 65–82.
[4] Carlo Giovanella, Andrea Iosue, Antonello Tancredi, Fabrizio Cicola,
Andrea Camusi, Fabrizia Moggio, Vincenzo Baraniello, Simone Car-
cone, and Silvio Coco. 2013. Scenarios for Active Learning in Smart
Territories. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal 16 (2013),
7–16.
[5] William S Logan. 2007. Closing Pandora’s box: human rights conun-
drums in cultural heritage protection. Springer.
[6] Marshall McLuhan. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of
Man. McGraw-Hill.
[7] George Papagiannakis, Michal Ponder, Tom Molet, Sumedha Kshirsagar,
Frederic Cordier, M Magnenat-Thalmann, and Daniel Thalmann. 2002.
LIFEPLUS: revival of life in ancient Pompeii, virtual systems and
multimedia. In Proceedings of VSMM 2002.
186