Shrh Tshrih Alqanwn Labn Sina
Shrh Tshrih Alqanwn Labn Sina
Shrh Tshrih Alqanwn Labn Sina
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﲪﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﺒﻴﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﺭﺳﻠﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﺼﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻴﺴﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ
ﺃﰊ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﺴﲔ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ،ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﲨﻌﻨﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﲨﻴﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻭﺍﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺧﻼﻗﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﲪﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺻﻮﺭ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﻳﻦ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﺧﺎﺻ ﹰﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﺃﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻦ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻃﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﻭﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮ ﻟﻪ .ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻇﻨﻨﺎﹰ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻏﺎﻟﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ
ﺃﻭ ﺇﺧﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﶈﻘﻖ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﺃﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺧﺎﻟﻔﻪ.
ﰒ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺗﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻦ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲬﺲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺇﻧﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﳑﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻠﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲨﻠ ﹰﺔ
ﻭﺗﻔﺼﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﺟﺰﺅﻫﺎ
ﻟﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻭﺍﳊﺪ ﻛﺎﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻴﺪ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻛﺎﻟﻴﺪ،
ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲰﻲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﳊﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻋﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﹰﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺁﻻﺕ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ
ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻴﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ .ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻗﻬﺮ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﻠﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺎﹰ،
ﺷﻬﻤﺎﹰ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺌﺎﹰ ،ﻣﻘﺪﺍﻣﺎﹰ ،ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻬﺮ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻜﻤﺔ ،ﻣﺼﻤﺘﺔ،
ﺧﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ،ﺣﱴ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺶ ،ﻭﺍﻫﻲ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻭﺩ ،ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﳊﻢ،
ﻭﻋﺼﺐ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻄﺔ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﳍﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻂ ﻓﻤﺜﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻠﻮﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻨﻔﺬ ﻟﻪ ﺷﻮﻙ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺭﻳﺶ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﺤﻔﺎﺓ ﳍﺎ ﺻﺪﻑ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ،ﻓﻤﺜﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻧﺐ ،ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺳﻨﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺼﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﺲ ﺇﱃ
ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺩ.
ﻭﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺛﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻜﻠﺐ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﺛﺪﺍﺀ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺟﻼﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻛﺐ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺃﺭﺟﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﺭﺟﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﺭﺟﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻠﺤﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻷﺳﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺧﻮﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻩ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﲔ ﺍﳍﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺛﺪﻱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ،ﻭﺛﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻗﺮﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ،ﻭﺛﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻗﺮﺑﺖ
ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﺗﻪ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺒﻄﺶ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﺎ :ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﲔ ﺍﳋﻔﺎﺵ ﺗﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺑﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻠﺒﺲ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﺡ ،ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻴﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻴﺎﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺎﺗﻪ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻟﻐﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ،ﰒ ﺗﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻪ ،ﻓﺘﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻭﺗﻨﺤﲏ ﺃﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ،
ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻴﺎﻣﻨﺔ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻤﺘﻴﺎﺳﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻓﺘﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﺷﺒﻬﹰﺎ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻛﺎﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﺟﻠﲔ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻴﺔ
ﻓﺎﻟﺸﺒﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻞ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ.
ﻼ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﻋﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﲝﺜﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﻮﺍﺭﺿﻪ ﺳﻬ ﹰ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻓﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺿﻤﺪﻩ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻗﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻀﺮﺭﺓ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻓﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﲞﻠﻊ ﺃﻭ ﳓﻮﻩ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻼ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻂ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺷﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﺼﺐ ،ﻭﳓﻮ
ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﻟﻴﻒ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻂ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺃﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻐﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻋﻀﻮ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﳌﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﲤﻜﻦ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﻓﻴﻨﺬﺭ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ .ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﻻﺋﻤﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺥ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ
ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﺐ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺿﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺣﲔ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﰲ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﰲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺣﲔ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺒﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻬﺎ ﳊﻤﻰ ،ﻭﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻬﺎ
ﻋﺼﱯ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺼﺐ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺯ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺮﺝ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻲﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺮﻭﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﻫﻮ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﺙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ
ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻭ ﲟﻘﺪﺍﺭﻩ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻠﻪ
ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺳﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻛﺒﺪﻱ ،ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻼﱄ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻄﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺆﺭﺏ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﻞ
ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﲪﺮ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﲪﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﺑﻠﻮﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﺑﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ
ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ،ﺑﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﲟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ
ﻼ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﹰﺎ ﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﻟﻪ. ﺑﻐﲑﻩ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﺼ ﹰ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﲟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻐﺺ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﶈﺘﺒﺲ ﰲ ﺇﻳﻼﻭﺱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ
ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺘﺒﺲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ
ﻻﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﹰﺍ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﺍ ﻟﻠﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﳌﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻌﻪ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ
ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﲝﻤﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻭﺳﺨﻮﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﻘﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ .ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻫﻀﻢ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﺘﺼﻐﲑ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻔﻞ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ .ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﺼﻐﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﻱﺀ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻻ ﻳﺪﻭﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ
ﻳﺘﺼﻐﺮ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﺒﺜﺎﹰ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﻓﻤﱴ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺁﻓﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻋﺮﺍﺿﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ .ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﳊﻤﻰ ﻭﲪﺮﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻮﺍﺩ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ،ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﳊﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻔﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻗﺪ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﲔ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﱂ ﲣﻠﻖ ﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺃﺭﺿﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﲰﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﻼ ﺃﺭﺿﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﲰﺎ ًﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮﺳﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺻﻠﺢ
ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﻓﺼﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﺑﻘﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﻨﺴﻞ ﻧﺴﻞ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﱵ ﻭﻓﺴﺪ.
ﻭﻻ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻧﺼﻔﻪ ﲰﻜﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻐﻞ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫ ﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﹰﺍ
ﲝﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻏﺮﺽ ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻮﺍﱂ ﻻ ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻧﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﻬﻮﺩﺓ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ.
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ،ﻓﺄﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻻ ﲣﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﺒﺜﺎﹰ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳏﺎﻝ ،ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻒ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻓﺄﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻇﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﻮﺯ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﻔﻲ ﻋﻨﺎ ﻻ ﳌﺎ ﻇﻨﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ.
ﻼ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻻ ﺃﻧﺎ ﳒﺰﻡ ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﻂ.
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻟﻠﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﻔﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳑﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﺇﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻣﺮ ﻋﺪﻣﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺄﻣﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻣﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺎﹰ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳛﻮﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺲ
ﻭﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ ﻓﻴﻀﻌﻒ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻲ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﻡ
ﺇﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﻃﺊ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﶈﺪﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﺄﻧﻴﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺗﻨﺼﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻨﺒﻬﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﺼﺒﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻄﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ .ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﺍﹰ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺳﺘﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﹰﺍ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﲞﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻴﺸﺘﺪ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻲ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺳﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ .ﻭﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﺍﹰ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻀﻮﻱ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﺰﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﺃﻱ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻮ ﻭ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻛﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻜﱪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲪﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺘﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ :ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ .ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﺟﻴﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻠﻤﻮﺳﺔ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺸﺪﺓ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺣﻲ ،ﻭﺑﱪﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ
ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻠﻮﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻳﺘﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻲ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺸﺪﺓ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺸﻮﹰﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻭﻃﹰﺄ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﻶﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺃﻭﺳﻊ.
ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻃﺢ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﲟﺠﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺇﺳﺨﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ
ﺃﰎ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﲟﻴﻞ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻟﲔ ﻓﻦ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﲞﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺑﲔ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻗﺬﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻧﻮﺍﺣﻴﻪ .ﻭﲞﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﺎ :ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺟﺬ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻈﻬﺎﺭ ﰲ
ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﳏﻴﻂ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﻬﺗﻤﺎ
ﺣﺴﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﹰﺍ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺘﺼﻐﲑ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺄﻛﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ.
ﻼ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻋﻦ ﻟﺬﻉ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺗﺎﺳﻌﻬﺎ :ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻨﻔﻌ ﹰ
ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻀﻮﻱ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ .ﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻟﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ.
ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻭﻋﺮﺽ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺗﺮﻃﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﲡﻒ ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻭﻋﺮﺽ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻀﻮﻱ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﶈﻮﻯ ﰲ
ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺗﺄﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻭﱃ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﻛﺎﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻏﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻛﻤﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﻛﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﰲ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻷﺟﻞ ﲤﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﱪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ
ﺑﺸﻜﻠﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ ،ﻭﺃﻭﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﺎﺋﻂ
ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﻮ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺫﻱ ﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ
ﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻈﻤﻪ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺑﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ،
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ.
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻻ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﺘﻤﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ .ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ؟ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﲣﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﺘﻪ ﲟﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ
ﲝﺴﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻭﺩ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺤﻔﺎﺓ ،ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﶈﺮﺯﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻃﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺎﻻﻗﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻣﺼﻤﺘﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﺪ .ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ
ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ.
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﲝﺴﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﺎ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻋﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻌﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬﻳﻦ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ
ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﲔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﲔ،
ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ.
ﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻌﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻔ ﺨﺬﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ،ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪﻳﻦ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ،ﳓﻦ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﲝﺚ ﳜﺼﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻩ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺒﲎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﲎ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺼﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮ ﻟﻪ :ﻭﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﺒﲏ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﲎ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺼﺐ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﳑﺘﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻃﻮﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ،ﰒ ﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ
ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺧﺸﺒﻬﺎ ،ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ .ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ .ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﺎﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﳛﻜﻢ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ
ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﲔ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺗﺎﺓ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﳏﻜﻤﺔ
ﻛﺎﻟﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻟﻠﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﻻﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﺒﲎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰒ ﻳﺒﲎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺘﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﺟﻌﻠﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﹰﺎ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ؟ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻒ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ .ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ
ﺑﺄﺩﱏ ﺿﻐﻂ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﻧﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳛﻮﻁ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺣﻲ .ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻀﻮ ﻟﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻏﲎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻮ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻷﻗﺼﻰ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﳉﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺇﺫ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ
ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﺎﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻻ ﻓﺮﺝ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﺷﺮﻑ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻨﺘﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺻﻮﻧﹰﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻏﺎﺋﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺘﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺑﺈﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲞﻠﻘﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ .ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ
ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻻﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺨﻦ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺝ ﻳﺘﺨﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻟﺘﺨﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﻲ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻱ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻨﺎﺳﻦ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻟﺘﻤﻨﻊ
ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻱ ﺑﻌﻘﺐ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ .ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ
ﺗﺸﻌﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ .ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ،ﻓﺨﻠﻘﺖ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﲟﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﺟﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻼﻉ ﻭﺃﺳﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﺪﻥ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺻﺪﻣﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺭﺓ
ﺍﳌﻨﺠﻨﻴﻖ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺸﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺻﻞ ﻟﺘﻤﻸ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ :ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻻﳒﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻛﲔ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺜﻘﻞ .ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻓﻴﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ،ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﳍﺎ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﻠﺺ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺏ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﻮ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﳌﺮﺧﻲ ﻟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﺺ ﺟﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﺘﺸﺒﺜﺔ ﲜﺴﻢ ﻳﻠﺒﺚ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ .ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ
ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻏﻠﺐ ﺗﺸﺒﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻓﻨﺤﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳝﻮﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﺘﺸﺒﺚ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﲟﺎ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻏﻠﺒﺔ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ.
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﻻﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺛﺨﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ .ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﺺ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﻘﻄﻊ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺛﺨﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﱂ ﳛﺘﻤﻠﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ.
ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﻭﻟﻠﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ .ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲟﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﲤﺎﻡ
ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳝﻨﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳝﻨﻌﻪ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳑﺮ ﻛﺎ ﺍﳌﻤﺮ ﻳﻨﻘﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻫﻠﻴﺰ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﳑﺮ ﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ،ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﺘﺤﺴﲔ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺎ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﲝﺴﺐ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﲨﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻠﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺼﻤﺘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺭﺓ
ﻣﺘﻼﻗﻴﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻤﻘﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳏﺴﻮﺳﹰﺎ ﲰﻲ
ﻣﺴﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺼﻤﺘﺎﹰ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺼﻤﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﳏﺴﻮﺳﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺸﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨ ﻼﹰ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺑﻞ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳎﻮﻓﹰﺎ .ﻭﻛﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻷﳕﻠﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﳏﺴﻮﺱ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺼﻐﺮﻩ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻌﺮﻩ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ .ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ.
ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﲢﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﳛﻮﺟﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﻋﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺼﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﺷﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﻼ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﻔﺘﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺇﺫ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻣﺼﻤﺘﹰﺎ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺛﺎﻗﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺫﺍ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺿﲔ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻷﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﳎﻮﻓﹰﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻓﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺧﻒ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺰﻳﻒ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﺘﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺐ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻸﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻟﻮ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻨﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻋﺴﺮ ﻭﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻟﻮ ﺣﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﻢ ﳛﺰﻭﻥ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣﺰﹰﺍ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻨﻜﺴﺮ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺰ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﻟﺘﻌﻴﲔ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻷﺟﻞ ﲣﻠﺨﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻡ ﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ
ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ،ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﹰﺎ
ﻼ ﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻱ ،ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻘﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻟﻠﻤﺦ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ .ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﺬ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻃﺒﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﳚﻒ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻃﻴﺐ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ .ﻷﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ .ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻮﺕ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﺢ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻃﻴﺐ .ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﻗﺪ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺿﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻃﻴﺐ ﳝﻨﻊ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﺎﳌﺼﻤﺖ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﳎﻮﻓﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺛﺮ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﲝﺴﺐ
ﺃﻣﻮﺭ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻀﻠﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﺃﺧﻒ .ﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ
ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺇﻗﻼﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺗﻀﻌﻒ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ ﻋﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻓﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﺃﺧﻒ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﳛﺼﻞ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﲣﻠﺨﻞ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻟﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺋﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﺶ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺣﺬﺍﺀ ﺛﻘﱯ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ،
ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻟﺘﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻊ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ،ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﺜﻘﻞ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﳌﺪﻓﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ،
ﻭﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺘﺮﻭﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ
ﻗﺪﺭ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺇﱃ ﲣﻠﺨﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻼ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻼ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰﺍﻟﺘﺮﻭﻳﺢ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺿﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻳﻘﻞ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻞ ﺗﻨﻔﺴﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ.
ﻼ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻭ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ؛ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻭﻳﺢ ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻭﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﲝﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﺘﻼﻗﻴﺔ،
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﲤﻠﺆﻫﺎ ﻟﻮﺍﺣﻖ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ
ﺃﻭ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻠﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻭﺩ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻧﺜﻨﺎﺅﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﻪ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ
ﻼ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻮﺙ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺩ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺲ ﻛﻤﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﺘﻨﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺧﻔﻴﺔ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻮﺛﻖ ﻛﻤﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻭﻛﻤﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ .ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﺍﻟﻌﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﲟﻮﺛﻖ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ ﺑﺎﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻟﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ.
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭﱃ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ :ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ :ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻠﺰﻕ .ﺃﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ :ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﻭﻫﻮ :ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ.
ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﻫﻮ :ﺍﳌﺮﻛﻮﺯ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻠﺰﻕ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻤﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻗﻦ.
ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ .ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻼﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺇﻟﺰﺍﻕ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺷﺄﻥ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ
ﻭﺣﺪﻩ .ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺰ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺰ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳝﻨﻊ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻠﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻠﲔ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺍﺕ.
ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ :ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻞ .ﺳﻮﺍ ًﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺍﳊﻔﺮ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻛﻤﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ.
ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﰲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﺎﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﳏﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﺴﻤﻰ :ﻣﻨﻘﺎﺭﹰﺍ .ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﺑﻞ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ
ﻼ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺼﲑﹰﺍ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺭﺃﺳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ :ﻋﻨﻘﹰﺎ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻓﺎﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ :ﺣﻘﹰﺎ ﻛﺤﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ .ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ :ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻐﺮﻕ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻐﺮﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﺗﻪ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻗﺼﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻓﺎﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ
ﻏﲑ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ .ﻋﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻛﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ .ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ :ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻄﺮﻑ :ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﳌﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻣﺘﻼﻗﻴﺔ .ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻪ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﺟﺜﺔ .ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﺇﺫ ﻧﻔﺲ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺟﺜﺔ ،ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ :ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻐﺎﺭ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﻛﻌﻈﻤﻰ
ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﺑﻠﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻋﻼﳘﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﺣﻘﺔ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ .ﻭﺍﻟﻼﺣﻘﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻠﺠﺎﻡ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ .ﻭﺇﻣﺎ
ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺳﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﺣﻖ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻼﺋﻘﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﲤﻠﺆﻫﺎ ﻟﻮﺍﺣﻖ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﺣﻖ،
ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﺣﻚ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺭ .ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ
ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻠﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻭﻫﻲ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻜﺎﻙ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺗﻄﻠﻖ ﺗﺎﺭﺓﹰ ،ﻭﺑﺮﺍﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﻳﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ.
ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ :ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﳜﺮﺟﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺰﺍﻉ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ
ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ.
ﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﹰﺓ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ .ﻭﺑﺮﺍﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ .ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ .ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ .ﺇﳕﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺑﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺳﺘﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﺢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻨﻴﻒ .ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ
ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ
ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺟﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﺳﺎﺗﺮﺓ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻭﺍﻗﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﻗﺒﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻣﹰﺎ
ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻢ .ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻧﺔ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻼ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﱂ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻉ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺎﻥ .ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺔ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺿﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﺪﻉ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﻟﺒﻄﻼﻥ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻼ ﲟﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺻﺪﻉ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻉ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻨﻔﺘﺢ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﻒ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻷﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺭﻭﺯﺓ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺼﺪﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﳏﻔﻮﻇﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻟﺘﺸﺒﺜﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻛﻌﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ .ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ .ﻭﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻟﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ .ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ
ﳛﺴﻦ ،ﻭﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻬﻴﺌﺎﹰ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﻟﻪ ﺁﻓﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻬﺗﻴﺄ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ
ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳏﻤﻮﺩﹰﺍ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﲔ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ﻟﻮﺍﺣﻖ .ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ،ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﻟﻪ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺣﻴﺚ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃ ﺱ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﻼ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨﻼﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﲝﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻛﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭﹰﺍ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺒﺎﺱ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻛﻌﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻠﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﻶﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻟﻠﺬﻱ
ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﺍ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﹰﺓ ﻟﺴﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺁﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﻷﻧﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ.
ﻼ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﺮﺃﺳﻪ ﺷﺆﻭﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮﻃﺎﻟﻴﺲ ﺣﻜﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺟ ﹰ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﳌﺎ ﻭﺟﺪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻭﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀﻩ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻐﻤﺰ ﰲ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﺄﺩﱏ ﻣﺲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﻜﺜﺮﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻀﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻊ ﺭﺍﺟﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻀﺮﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺮﺍﻋﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ؟.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬﻳﻦ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺦ ﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺤﺎﻡ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺗﻜﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺳﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﺐ ﲣﻠﺨﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻳﻘﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﳍﺎ
ﻟﻶﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﳌﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻓﺎﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﳕﺎﻧﻊ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻜﻨﺎ ﳕﻨﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﺔ .ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ ﺭﺩﻱﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ ،ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻪ.
ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﹰ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ﻛﺈﻳﺜﺎﻕ
ﺷﺆﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻳﺜﺎﻕ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺛﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ.
ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ .ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﺍﶈﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﺍ ﻻﺣﻘﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺫﻭ
ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺄﺗﻰ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺃﲞﺮﺗﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﺜﺮﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﻠﻈﻬﺎ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺭﻃﻮﺑﺘﻪ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻷﻓﺴﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ ،ﻭﺁﳌﺖ ﻭﺻﺪﻋﺖ ،ﻭﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺔ
ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻻﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﻫﻦ ﻟﻪ ،ﻣﻌﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻓﺮﺝ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﺗﻀﻌﻔﻪ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ،ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻞ
ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻟﻴﺜﺒﺖ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ،ﻓﺘﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻷﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻠﻚ.
ﻭ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﺗﺘﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﰒ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ :ﻓﻤﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺷﻴﺌﲔ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ .ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ .ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﺑﲔ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ
ﻻ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍ ﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ.
ﻼ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺷﻜﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻏﲑ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺷﻜ ﹰ
ﻛﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻐﻤﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺀﺍﻥ .ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ .ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻫﻮ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺗﻪ :ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺘﻪ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺴﻤﲔ ﺗﺴﺎﻭﻯ ﳏﻴﻄﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ .ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺇﻗﺎﻣﺔ
ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ .ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻯ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﻌﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﻜﻌﺐ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﳐﻤﺴﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺪﺳﺔ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ
ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻯ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺘﻪ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ .ﻓﺎﻟﻜﺮﻯ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺴﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ.
ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻚ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻄﻮﺡ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺑﻊ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﻤﺲ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﺮﺓ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ .ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻄﺤﺎﺕ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ .ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻳﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ
ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻡ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺫﺍ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺴﺮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰲ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻩ .ﻭﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻯ
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻋﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﺿﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ
ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ .ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ .ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ
ﻛﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺪﺩﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺪﺩﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻷﺟﻠﻪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ
ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﳉﻨﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻴﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻭﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﺇﱃ
ﻃﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻧﻀﻐﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻸﻧﻪ
ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ .ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺀﺍﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻧﺘﻮﺀﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ
ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﳛﻔﻆ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﺶ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﺴﻨﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻟﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺀﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻟﻴﻘﻴﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺪﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﻳﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺳﺎﺗﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻻ
ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﺪﺑﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﺃﰎ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﺎﺩﻣﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲜﺰﺀ ﺃﻗﻞ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﻫﻴﺄﻬﺗﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ .ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺩﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺫﺑﺎﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ.
ﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ :ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺇﳕﺎ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ
ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﻨﺸﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﺃﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺼﺎﺭ ﺃﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﻛﻞ ﺇﺻﺒﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻠﻬﺎ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﲰﻴﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﳍﺎ
ﺑﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻃﺔ .ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﺎﺭﻳﻦ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪﳘﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻗﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻫﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ ،ﻭﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻞ ﳘﺎ ﻟﺰﺍﻕ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻟﺰﺍﻗﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻻ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ .ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺯﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻴﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﺫﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻏﲑ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺸﺮﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻴﺄﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻖ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﺮﻗﻘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺀ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﰒ ﻳﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺀ ﺗﺮﻗﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺗﺮﻗﻖ ﺫﺍﻙ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﻨﺤﻲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻧﻜﺸﺎﻑ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺃﻥ ﳚﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍ ﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ،
ﻭﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﱂ.
ﻭﺃﻃﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﰲ ﲰﺖ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ،
ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻧﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﺟﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺲ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﻭﺃﻭﺳﻊ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ :ﻓﺎﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺑﺄﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ.
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﺳﻲ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳝﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﻴﻂ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀ ﻛﺒﲑ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻛﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﲢﺪﺑﹰﺎ
ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺟﺎﹰ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻄﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺴﻄﺢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﳏﻴﻂ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ
ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﳝﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﲞﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻌﻢ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺃﺣﻜﻢ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻟﻮ ﺍﳓﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻟﺒﻘﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﳋﻂ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﳋﻄﻮﻁ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﻗﻞ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳝﺮ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ،ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻳﻘﺎﻃﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻧﺼﻔﲔ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻌﹰﺎ ﶈﻴﻄﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﻓﻬﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﺄﻋﻼﻩ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ .ﻭﳌﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﲢﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺟﺎﹰ؛ ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻷﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﱃ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻣﻨﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻛﺸﻜﻞ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺮﻭﻁ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺑﺴﻄﺢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺿﻠﻌﻲ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ،
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻻ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ .ﻭﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻠﻌﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﲔ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻥ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ :ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻗﻞ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻥ :ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻳﻘﻞ
ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺁﺧﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻓﲑﺗﻔﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﺭﻓﻊ .ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺫﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﳝﻨﺔ
ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺎ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻷﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﻨﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺘﺎﺭ .ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺟﺐ
ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﻤﺪﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﲤﺪﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﱵ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻤﺎﻝ،
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ .ﻭﺗﻌﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﺸﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻌﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻓﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻼ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺳﻬﻤﻲ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻘﺺ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ
ﻛﻼﳘﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺺ
ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﺍﻥ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺀﺓ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ .ﺃﻭ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀﻳﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﳌﺴﻔﻂ .ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻻ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﺍﺑﻊ ﻏﲑ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ،ﺃﻱ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺭﺩﺍﺀﺓ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻐﲑ ﺑﺘﻐﲑ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ :ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻐﲑ
ﲝﺴﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﺭﺯﺍﻥ :ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ .ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ
ﻏﲑﻩ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﺩﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺯ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺩﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﳐﺮﻭﻁ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺍﺯ ﻟﺴﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﻭﻁ
ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﺴﻬﻤﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﺮ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻳﲔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻳﲔ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ
ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ،ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻳﲔ
ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺆﻭﻧﻪ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺰﺍﻕ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺜﺮﻬﺗﺎ ﺳﺒﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﺼﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ ﻭﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ،ﻭﻧﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﺣﻼﻝ ﺃﲞﺮﺗﻪ ﻭﺃﺩﺧﻨﺘﻪ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺳﻴﻞ
ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧ ﻼﺕ .ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﲤﻜﻨﺖ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻣﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﳓﻼﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺴﺖ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻼﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻄﻠﺔ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻼﺕ
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ .ﻭﺷﺆﻭﻥ
ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﺟﺎﻝ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺃﲞﺮﺓ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﰲ
ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﻦ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺷﻌﻮﺭ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﻦ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻻ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﻥ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ .ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻡ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﺑﺪﺭﺯ ﻳﻘﻄﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻣﲔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻧﺼﻔﲔ ﺇﺫ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻣﹰﺎ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻭﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ
ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﰒ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ
ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﹰ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﳘﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﳘﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻫﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ .ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ :ﺍﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﲬﺴﺔ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺳﺘﺔ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ،ﻭﻫﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ :ﺍﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﻫﻦ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ :ﺍﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ :ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ.
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ.
ﻓﻠﻨﺸﺮﻉ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻭﻟﻨﺤﺪﺩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ ﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ .ﻭﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻠﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ،
ﻳﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺩﺭﺯ ﺁﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ.
ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺩﺭﺯ ﳝﺮ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻃﺮﻓﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﻔﺮﰐ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ
ﻭﻣﺪﺍﺧﻼﺗﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﺰﺍﻕ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺳﲔ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺯ ﺁﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺿﻠﻌﺎ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ .ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﺤﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻘﺐ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺛﻘﺐ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺍ ﱐ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ،ﻭﻃﺮﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﳘﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﺑﺪﺭﺯ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﺭﺯ ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮﻩ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ:
ﻼ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﳌﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻣ ﹰ
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻃﺮ ﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﻠﻘﻞ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺪﻋﻢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻴﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﺳﻘﻮﻃﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﺠﺎﺭ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻲ :ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺍﻗﻮﺭ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﻔﻈﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺃﻭ ﺳﻘﻄﺔ،
ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﲟﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺗﺼﺎ ﹰﻻ
ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ .ﻭﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﺒﺔ ﻧﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﺻﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﲞﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﻔﺮﺗﺎﻥ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ
ﻓﻴﺘﺨﺬ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻭﳝﺮ
ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﺻﻌﺪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﹰﺎ
ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺗﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻘﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﺭﺟﻊ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ،
ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺮﺽ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﺟﺰﺀﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ
ﻼ ﺑﻄﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺑﻄﺮﰲ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﲔ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ .ﻭﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﺩﺭﺯﹰﺍ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ .ﻭﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﺟﺰﺀﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﳝﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﻻ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻳﲔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﹰﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ.
ﻭﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﲤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﹰﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ .ﻭﺯﺍﻭﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﳘﺎ ﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﺫ ﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻳﲔ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺴﻤﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺮ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺯﻳﺪ ﰲ
ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻟﻴﺘﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ،
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺃﻋﲏ :ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻭﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ .ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻇﻦ .ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﳌﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻴﻬﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﲢﺪﻩ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﲢﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﲝﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻨﻊ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﳔﻼﻉ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻠﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ،
ﻭﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﻔﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺣﱴ ﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ
ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ .ﻭﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﺎﻅ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺰﺅ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻠﺘﺼﻘﺔ ﺑﻪ
ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﻨﺜﲏ ﺑﺄﺩﱏ ﺿﻐﻂ ﻳﻀﻐﻄﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﲟﺜﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﲔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﳍﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﺳﺘﺮ ﻋﻀﻞ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﺎ
ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻨﻒ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﺮﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻳﺘﺄﺩﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﺮ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﰲ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﺛﻠﻤﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻗﺒﻴﺤﺎﹰ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳛﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﳝﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻴﹰﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻻﹰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﳛﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭ ﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻳﺘﻮﳘﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻀﻠﻌﻲ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﳛﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ
ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ
ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﺟﺰﺀ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻱ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﳏﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﲤﺎﻡ ﺣﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺿﻠﻌﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺩ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﺴﺘﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﳐﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻲ ،ﻭﻣﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﻫﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺎﺭﺝ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ
ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻓﻤﻨﺎﻓﻌﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﻨﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﲜﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ.
ﻼ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ .ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﲢﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻻﳓﺪﺍﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨ ﹰ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻛﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺗﺮﺗﻜﺰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺁﻓﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﺗﻪ .ﻭﻷﻥ ﻛﱪ ﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﲟﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻀﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﲝﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﺭﻃﺐ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻳﺔ
ﳑﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﲢﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ
ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ .ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻋﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ:
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﶈﻮﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﻗﻞ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ
ﻼ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻟﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ.
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨ ﹰ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ .ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺘﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻀﻄﺠﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻼ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻮﻫﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺃﻗﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﻨﺤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ
ﻭﺃﲞﺮﻬﺗﺎ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ .ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﺒﺴﺖ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﻮﺧﺔ ﺍﺗﺴﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻓﻄﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﹰﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ.
ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻹﻛﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻘﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﺭﺟﻊ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﳓﺪﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ.
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﳏﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﰲ ﺍﳓﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﻃﺮﻓﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎﻩ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﰒ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻋﲏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻼ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ.
ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍ ﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ
ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ.
ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﻳﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀﻩ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ
ﻓﻴﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﺯ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ
ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﻳﻦ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﺑﺴﻄﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻓﺴﺪ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻃﻮﻻﹰ ،ﻭﺩﺭﺯ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ ﺇﱃ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺜﻨﻴﺘﲔ ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺇﻥ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻃﺮﻕ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺼﺐ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﻚ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﺔ ،ﺇﺫ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ
ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻟﺘﻌﻢ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲣﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺿﻠﻌﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺒﲔ ﺃﻋﲏ
ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﺍﳉﻨﺒﻴﲔ ﻭﻟﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲢﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳉﻨﱯ ﻣﻨﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﰐ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ
ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻛﻨﻈﲑﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎﻥ .ﻓﺎﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺘﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻂ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺗﲔ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ .ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﺩﺓ .ﻭﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ
ﻟﻠﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺘﲔ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺘﲔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻤﺘﲔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﻨﻴﺘﲔ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺘﲔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﱵ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﺘﲔ ﳌﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﱵ ﻟﻠﻤﺜﻠﺚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺣﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ .ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺘﲔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﻳﺎ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ :ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺩﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺯ
ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ .ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ
ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ؛ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﳝﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺖ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﶈﺪﺩ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺷﻔﲑ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ
ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳌﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺗﻘﻰ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺂﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﳌﺂﻕ .ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻲ ﻭﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ.
ﻼ .ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻓﻴﻤﺮ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﳌﺂﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﲟﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ،ﰒ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﺘﺤﺪﺭ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ،ﻭﺑﲔ
ﺾ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ،ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺂﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍ ﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻋﻈﻢ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺑﻌ ﹴ
ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ
ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ .ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳚﺎﻭﺯ ﺷﻔﺮﻩ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻧﻘﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﰒ ﻳﻐﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﺘﺤﺪﺩ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻫﻮ
ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ .ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ .ﺃﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ .ﻭﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ
ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻘﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﻛﺎﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﻠﻌﻠﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺻﻐﺮﻫﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﺔ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻢ ﺁﻓﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ،ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﳘﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺘﻬﺎ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﻴﺘﺤﻠﻞ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﺒﺔ
ﲢﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻉ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺣﺪﻭﺛﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﱂ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻠﺒﻜﺎﺀ ﻟﺘﺴﺨﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺻﻌﺪﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻏﻠﻈﺖ ﻭﱂ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﻟﻐﻠﻈﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﺼﻌﺪﺓ ﺩﻓﻌ ﹰﺔ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﻴّﻦ
ﺑﺼﻔﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ .ﻭﺇﺫ ﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ
ﺍﻷﻣﲔ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺆﻭﻥ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ.
ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻠﺒﻜﺎﺀ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻉ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ ﲣﺮﺝ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻀﺤﻚ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﳏﺪﺛﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺴﺨﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﺮﺡ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺳﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺐ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﺎﺳﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ .ﺇﻥ
ﲎ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ، ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﱂ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ .ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﻏﲑﻱ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻌ ً
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻈﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺛﺨﲔ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻭﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺻﻠﺐ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ.
ﻭﲢﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻭﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﻭﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ .ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﳛﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻀﻄﺠﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﹰﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳛﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺘﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ
ﺃﻭ ﻻﹰ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺮﻓﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻨﺎﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ
ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ .ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺛﻘﺒﺘﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﻳﻔﻀﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻗﻮﻡ
ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺘﲔ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻠﺜﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ.
ﺑﻘﻲ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ،
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻓﻴﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ :ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻻﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻟﻸﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ
ﻷﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻸﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ،ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺆﳌﺎﺕ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻨﺎﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻑ ﻟﻠﻬﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ
ﲞﻼﻑ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳏﺠﻮﺏ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺗﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﻣﹰﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﺽ
ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ؟ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻋﺮﺍﺿﻦ ،ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻛﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺴﺖ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ،ﻭﱂ
ﺗﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺰﻻﻕ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ .ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﳌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻻ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﳌﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﻦ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺖ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ،ﻭﺟﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻐﺮﺳﻪ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﻭﳛﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺆﱂ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺃﳌﹰﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻭﻣﻐﺮﺳﻬﺎ
ﻓﺘﺤﺪﺙ ﺍﻵﻻﻡ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻭﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﻻ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻣﺮﻛﻮﺯﺓ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﻥ ،ﻋﺪﳝﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﲢﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺰﺍﻝ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ،ﻓﺘﺤﺪﺙ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﱂ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﻮﺯﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺮﻓﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻧﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ
ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺮﻓﲔ ﲢﻠﻠﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﺃﻋﲏ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺟﺬ ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ
ﰲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﰲ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻵﻻﻡ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻵﻻﻡ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺟﺬ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻓﻼ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺁﻻﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ
ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﱪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ
ﻳﻘﻞ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﳊﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﱪ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ
ﻋﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻵﻻﻡ.
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺃﻗﻞ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ :ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ،ﻭﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻟﺒﻘﻴﺔ
ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻓﻤﻨﺎﻓﻌﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ:
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﻭﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻄﺎﺱ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻋﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ
ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺪﺧﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺗﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﻴﻄﺎﺭ ﻓﻢ ﻓﺮﺱ ﺑﺂﻟﺔ ﺳﺪﺕ ﻣﻨﺨﺮﻳﻪ ﻓﻤﺎﺕ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ .ﻭﺃﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﺳﺎﺋﺴﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻤﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳝﻸ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﺨﺮﻳﻪ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺨﻪ
ﰲ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻟﻸﻧﻒ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﺑﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻭﳚﻤﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺫﻫﻨﺞ ﰲ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ
ﻭﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﻤﻌﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﻴﺔ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻧﻒ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ،
ﻭﺇﱃ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﻴﺔ .ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﺬ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺘﺎﻥ ﲝﻠﻤﱵ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ
ﻼ ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﳍﻮ ﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ.
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺍﻹﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻛﺎﻟﻨﻮﻥ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺍﻹﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﻭﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﻡ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ ﲜﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻞ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﲟﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﲟﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍﳌﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻛﺎﳌﺰﻣﺎﺭ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺪ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﹰﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻻ ﻳﺴﺪ ﻭﻗﺘﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﻔﺘﺢ ﻭﻗﺘﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ .ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺪ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ
ﻳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺪ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺗﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﳚﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺼﲑ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ. ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻁ ﲝﺎﻝ ﻳﺘﻘﺰﺯ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻁ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺳﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﺰﺍﲪﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺦ ،ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻬ ﹰ
ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮﻟﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻼﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﻮ ﻗﻮﻉ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻬﺗﻴﺄ ﻟﻼﺭﺗﻀﺎﺽ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺃﺛﻘﻞ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﻓﻠﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻟﺴﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺭﻗﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ،
ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻣﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺫﻫﻨﺞ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﹰﺍ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﳘﺎ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻠﺜﲔ.
ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺆﺫﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺑﺼﺎﺭ .ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﻛﺐ
ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﻴﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳉﺮﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﻤﺎ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ .ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﰲ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻔﺮﺟﺎ ﻭﺗﺘﻮﺳﻌﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻗﺔ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻔﺎﺀ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻟﻴﻌﻴﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺑﺎﺭﺗﻌﺎﺩﳘﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺿﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺧﻠﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﺃﻃﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻭﺍﻧﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ .ﻭﺃﻟﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﳘﺎ
ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ .ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻌﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺑﻘﺴﻤﲔ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻁ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ
ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺴﻤﻪ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻳﻬﻴﺌﻪ ﻟﻼﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﺇﺫ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻛﻞ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻼﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﳌﺨﺎﻁ ﻟﻐﻠﻈﻪ ﻭﻟﺰﻭﺟﺘﻪ ﺑﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﺑﺎﺏ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻀﻴﻴﻘﻪ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻒ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺴﻢ ﺑﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﺘﻬﻴﺄ
ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺭﻗﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﱂ ﻳﻔﺪ ﰲ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻭﻻﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺑﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﻴﲔ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﺟﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺃﻟﲔ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ .ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻄﺎﻭﻋﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﻴﲔ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻸﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺣﻴﺚ ﲢﺘﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ .ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﺎﱐ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﲔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺘﻬﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻟﻼﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ .ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳉﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻣﻪ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺛﻖ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﱂ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺹ ،ﻓﺴﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ...ﺇﱃ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻀﻎ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ
ﺍﻵﰐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺒﺔ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺭﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨﻠﺔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻪ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﺒﻌﻀﻪ
ﺁﻓﺔ ،ﱂ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻬﻧﺎ .ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻗﻦ ،ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﲔ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ،
ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﺰﺍﻗﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺿﻌﻔﹰﺎ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺪﺛﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺍﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻷﻥ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺧﻔﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻌﺎ ﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩﺍ ﻗﻮﺓ
ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﺘﻒ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻓﻠﻴﺘﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ
ﻼ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻌﻘﻔﺔ ﺗﻮﻫﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳘﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ .ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﲣﻠﺨ ﹰ
ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻛﺮﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺗﺘﻬﻨﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﲢﺖ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﲝﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﺒﺚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ
ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﳔﻼﻉ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻔﻮﺕ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻲ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻔﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﺼﻐﲑ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﻭﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺣﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﻖ
ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺍﻹﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺳﻘﻮﻃﻬﺎ ﺧﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻼﺡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺾ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺴﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﳉﻮﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻮﺯ ،ﻭﺣﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺎﺭ
ﻟﻘﻮﺗﻪ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﺎ :ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺴﻢ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺇﻻ ﺍﻹﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰒ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﻼﺣﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﻴﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﻉ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ
ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺄﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺔ .ﰲ
ﺗﺼﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ .ﻛﺎﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﳋﻨﺰﻳﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻴﺎﺑﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺴﻼﺡ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ
ﻣﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺼﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﺡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﲔ ﺑﺄﻧﻴﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺎﺩ
ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻪ ﻟﻠﺴﻔﺎﺩ .ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲨﻊ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻼ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﲔ
ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻸﻧﺜﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻓﺎﻋﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻠﺬﻛﺮ ﻧﺎﺑﲔ
ﻭﻟﻸﻧﺜﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ﻟﻀﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﻘﺮﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﺡ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﳋﻨﺎﺯﻳﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻠﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﻘﺘﺎﻝ ،ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺄﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﻭﺫ ﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﻨﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ
ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﺔ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺐ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺪﻭﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻻ
ﲣﻠﻖ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻴﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﻘﺘﺎﻝ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺄﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ .ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺣﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﺒﺜﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﺼﻴﺪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﻛﺒﺔ .ﺗﻨﺰﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺏ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﺏ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻛﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﻛﻞ ﺍ ﻟﻠﺤﻢ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﻛﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﻛﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻊ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻓﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺗﻘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﲝﺮﻱ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﻛﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ﻷﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺻﻔﻮﻑ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺣﺎﺩﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻮﻙ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺳﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﳍﻨﺪ ﻷﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺻﻔﻮﻑ .ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻸﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﲣﻠﻖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ .ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻃﻔﺎﻝ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺻﺒﻴﺎﹰ ﻃﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﺳﻨﲔ ،ﻭﻭﻟﺪ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ .ﻭﻬﺑﺬﻩ
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﻬﺑﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺨﻠﻖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺔ
ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻇﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﲣﻠﻖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﺇﻻ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﻠﺢ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﺪ
ﺑﻐﲑ ﺃﻇﻔﺎﺭ .ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻠﺢ ﲝﺪﺗﻪ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻓﺒﻌﻀﻪ ﻳﺘﺨﻠﻖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﳊﻮﺍﺟﺐ
ﻭﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺸﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺸﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﻄﲔ
ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺸﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺴﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﰒ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ .ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺎﹰ ﺑﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﱯ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻨﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﲟﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻭﺑﺄﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺃﻭ
ﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﻨﻮﺍﺟﺬ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺃﻭ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻦ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ
ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻮ ﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﳌﺎ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﲢﺲ ﻭﺗﺘﺨﺪﺭ ﻭﺗﺘﺄﱂ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ .ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻇﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ
ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ
ﺃﻋﲏ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﻨﻤﻮ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﻮﻋﺔ .ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺮﺿﻬﺎ
ﻟﻼﻧﺴﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﻢ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻇﻔﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺷﺎﺭﻛﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ﺗﻘﺼﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺼﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺍﻻﳒﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﺎﳌﻀﻎ ﻣﻊ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﻮﳍﺎ ﺍﳊﺴﻲ ،ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ.
ﻭﺗﺎﺳﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻟﻐﲑﻫﺎ.
ﻭﻋﺎﺷﺮﻫﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻘﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻟﻸﺳﻨﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺛﻨﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺑﺎﻋﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﻠﻘﻄﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻄﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ ﲟﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺮﺿﺔ ﺣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺪﻭﻡ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻧﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻧﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﻠﻜﺴﺮ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻛﺴﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﺴﺮﻩ ﺑﺄﺿﺮﺍﺳﻪ
ﻻ ﺑﺄﻧﻴﺎﺑﻪ .ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺒﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻮﺯ ﻓﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻛﺴﺮﻫﺎ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻫﻲ
ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻃﻌﻤﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺴﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ،ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳛﺎﻭﻝ ﻛﺴﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻷﻧﻴﺎﺏ ﻓﻜﺄﻬﻧﺎ
ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﺴﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﳏﺪﺩﺓ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﺴﺮﻩ ﻓﺘﻬﻴﺌﻪ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ
ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺳﺤﻖ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ ﻭﻃﺤﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻏﻼﻇﹰﺎ ﻛﺒﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺴ ﺤﻖ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲟﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ
ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺄﲰﺎﺀ ﻣﺸﺘﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻷﺿﺮﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﺣﲔ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻃﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﻴﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺮ ﳍﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﻴﹰﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺸﺘﻖ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﺑﻞ ﲰﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﻬﺎ .ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻝ ﳍﺎ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺏ ﻟﺸﺒﻬﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﻨﺎﻬﻧﺎ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺟﺬ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﺴﺘﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻼﻥ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ﺑﻜﺴﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺀ
ﺃﻱ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ﺑﻀﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﺀ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻼﻡ.
ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻟﲔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳐﺎﻟﻂ ﻟﻠﻌﻈﺎﻡ؟ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﲜﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﻤﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎ.
ﺑﻘﻲ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﺚ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻴﺲ؟
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺷﻨﻊ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻬﻢ ﺳﻮﻓﺴﻄﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻝ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺴﻄﺔ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ :ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻜﻤﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ
ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﲑ ﻻﺯﻡ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﺑﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩﺓ،
ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺪﻟﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻈﺎﻳﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﺼﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ....ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﳊﻢ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ
ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺅﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ،ﻭﻟﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﳑﺘﺪ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﳛﻮﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ .ﻭﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ
ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ.
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﳍﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﺴﻠﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﳛﺘﺒﺲ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ.
ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﺜﺎﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺎﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺷﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ؛ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺎﺗﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﻙ ﻭﺃﺟﻨﺤﺔ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳜﺮﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﺋﺒﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ
ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ ﻓﺤﺼﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺿﺎﻥ
ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﳘﺎ :ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻧﺴﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳓﺮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﳝﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﺍﳊ ﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﻷﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻰ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺧﺎﺻ ﹰﺔ
ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺬﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﳊﺬﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺗﺘﺨﻠﻠﻪ ﺃﻓﻀﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻳﺼﺪﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ
ﺛﻘﺐ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻳﻨﻔﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺛﻘﺐ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎﹰ ،ﺑﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ .ﻷﻥ
ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ،ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻞ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻏﻠﻈﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻛﻞ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺴﻨﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻜﺸﻮﻑ ﰲ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ،ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳝﻨﺔ
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺴﺮﺓ .ﻭﻳﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﻮ ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﲝﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﺟﻌﻞ ﳐﺮﺝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺘﻤﺎﻣﻪ
ﰲ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳌﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﰲ ﺿﻐﻄﻪ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﻣﺰﺍﲪﺘﻪ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻓﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ
ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺛﺨﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺍﳓﲎ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﺪﺛﹰﺎ ﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻀﻐﺎﻁ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﻻ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺃﻱ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻘﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻘﻴﺐ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻀﻴﻖ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻻ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻴﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻀﻐﻄﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﻫﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻻﻗﺖ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﳍﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﻫﺎ
ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺛﺨﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻐﻂ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﳐﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﱂ ﲡﻌﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻟﻮ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻀﻴﻘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﲢﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻻ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺇﱃ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺳﺒﻊ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﻭﻫﻲ ﲬﺲ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﹸﻠﻲّ ﰲ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺨﺮﺯﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻓﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻻ ﻋﻨﻖ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺖ
ﳍﺎ ﺑﻔﻤﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻓﻼ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ .ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻖ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻮﺕ ﺑﻔﻤﻪ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺰﺍﻧﺔ ﻳﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑ ﰒ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺻﻠﺐ ﺿﻴﻖ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﰒ ﻳﻔﻀﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺻﻠﺐ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻓﻴﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻓﺎﳋﺰﺍﻧﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﻀﺖ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﳍﺎ ،ﺍﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻧﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺻﻠﺐ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺮﻋﻬﺎ
ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﻮﺕ ،ﰒ ﳛﺘﺒﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﻤﻬﺎ ،ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻓﻴﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﰲ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﺘﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ،ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﻤﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻴﺤﺼﻞ ﰲ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻭﳛﺴﻦ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ
ﳏﺪﻭﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﺘﺄﻟﻒ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﺄﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﲟﻨﺰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﻳﺖ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﻗﻼﳍﺎ
ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺛﻘﻞ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ .ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻘﻮﻡ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﺄﻃﻰﺀ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﰲ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﻴﻞ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻣﺎﻟﺖ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳍﺎ ﻛﺎﳋﻠﻊ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﻼ ﻭﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﲢﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻓﻘﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ،
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺳﺒﻌﺎﹰ ،ﻭﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻌﻨﻖ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﻨﻨﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ
ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺃﻭﺗﺎﺭ
ﻭﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻭﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺷﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪ
ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻗﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺎﺳﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﻐﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻭﺃﺟﻨﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺟﻨﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ
ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﺗﻀﻴﻖ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳌﺎ ﺻﻐﺮﺕ ﺳﻨﺎﺳﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺃﺟﻨﺤﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺒﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺭﺃﺳﲔ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﺎﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﻕ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺆﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺎﻕ ﻓﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺻﻐﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻛﱪ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺨﺮﺯﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳋﺮﺯﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺧﺮﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻼﺳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ
ﻭﺃﻭﻻﻫﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﺮﺯﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻗﺮﺏ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳋﺮﺯﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﺬﺭﺓ ﳌﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻏﲑ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺗﺘﻢ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﳝﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻭﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻫﻮ
ﺑﺄﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻼ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺗﱪﺯ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﻗﻼﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﻦ
ﻼ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺇﻗﻼﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺓ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﻛ ﹰ
ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﲤﻠﻴﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﳑﻠﺴﺔ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺑﻨﻘﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺛﻘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻔﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﺒﻘﻲ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻗﺪ ﻫﻴﺊ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﹰﺍ ﺣﺮﻳﺰﹰﺍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻣﻊ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻳﺮﺑﻄﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻦ ﺗﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﺼﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﹰﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻮﻗﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻏﺮﺑﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻻ ﺳﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺣﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺟﻨﺎﺣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﻏﲑ ﻣﺸﻘﻮﻗﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻠﺘﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﺗﺪﺧﻼﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﰐ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺣﻔﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺃﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻖ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ
ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ ﺃﻛﱪ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ
ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻠﺲ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ،ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻻ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﺎ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ .ﻭﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻷﺳﻔﻠﻬﺎ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﻣﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ....ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺫﻫﺒﺖ ﺟﺴﻮﻣﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻠﻴﺔ ﻗﺼﺎﺭﹰﺍ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﻹﺫﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﺴﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻨﺎﺳﻦ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺮﺯﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻼﺳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ،ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﺮﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﺪ
ﻟﻜﻞ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻟﻴﺲ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﻌﲔ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﺑﻼ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﺮ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﳏﺴﻦ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻷﻥ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ
ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ
ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺷﺮ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﺗﻘﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺧﻔﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﳐﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺗﺎﻥ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻛﻼﻡ ﻛﺎﳋﺎﲤﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ .ﻗﺪ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﳌﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻌﺪﺩﻫﺎ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻓﻤﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ:
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﳌﺎ ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ،ﻭﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎ ﻳﺔ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﲤﻨﻊ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻛﺎﻟﻀﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻘﻄﺔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺃﺧﺮ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻟﻄﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺃﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﲝﻴﺚ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﹰﺍ ﺑﻄﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺑﺜﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﺭ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻣﺎ ﲢﺘﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ .ﻭﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺗﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ،ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺒﻄﻦ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺒﺚ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﻭﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﺘﲔ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﺍﻻﺿﻼﻉ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﻻﻧﻀﻐﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺂﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ
ﻭﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻻﻧﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ
ﻼ.
ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻴﹰﺄ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﺑﺄﺩﱏ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﻘﻴ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﳏﺬﻭﺭﹰﺍ ﻟﻮ ﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺑﻞ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻷﻥ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺎﱄ ﺃﺳﻮﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ :ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺗﻘﻞ.
ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﺷﺮﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻨﺎﺀ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺴﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ
ﻛﺎﻟﻜﺴﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻧﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺩﻱﺀ ﻓﺠﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺃﻫﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻟﺮﻣﺎﺡ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺎﺫﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻀﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ.
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺴﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺗﻀﻴﻖ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻭﻳﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻼﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻏﺬﺍ ًﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻧﻔﺨﹰﺎً ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ
ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ.
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﺝ ﻳﺘﺨﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻗﺪ ﺩﻟﻠﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ،
ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﻼﺀ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ .ﻓﺒﻄﻠﺖ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ.
ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺧﻔﻴﺔ .ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻦ
ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺧﻔﻴﺔ .ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻞ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ،ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ
ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻓﺘﻀﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻼ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﳑﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺛﻘﻴ ﹰ
ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺒﻖ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﻳﻨﺨﻠﻖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﳏﻴﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﳏﻴﻄﻪ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﺎﺋﺐ
ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﻷﻣﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﻼﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻄﺒﺦ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﺦ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺣﺎﺟﺰﹰﺍ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻬﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺫﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻭ
ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺆﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺰﺍﲪﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺝ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ
ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﱂ ﻳﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻔﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻨﻴﺎﹰ ﻋﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺋﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﺗﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﲢﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻀﺎﺭ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻮﺭ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﺣﺎﻃﺖ
ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻻ
ﳜﻔﻰ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻱ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﺗﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﻤﻠﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﻮ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲤﻠﺆﻩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻼ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻀﻐﺎﻁ ﺗﺰﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺜﻘ ﹰ
ﻭﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺎﹰ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﻮﺩ ﻫﻀﻤﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺅﻩ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺑﻞ
ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﺨﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺦ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﺽ
ﳍﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﲢﻴﻄﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻼ
ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲣﻠﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻏﺎﺋﺒﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻣﻌﺮﺿﺔ ﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ .ﻓﺎﺿﻄﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺂﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻟﻴﺰﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺂﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﻭﻷﻥ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻻ ﺗﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺎﹰ ﺇﻻ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺯﺩﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﺬ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻴﺔ ﳍﺎ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺷﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﲢﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﲣﻠﻖ ﺃﺿﻼﻋﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻌﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺨﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻠﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﺿﻠﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻧﻘﺼﻦ ﺿﻠﻌﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺂﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﲬﺴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺂﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲢﻴﻂ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻷﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﺑﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺄﻋﺎﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮ،
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﱂ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﲔ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﻥ ،ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻠﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻨﻈﲑﻩ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﺘﺘﻢ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﳛﺼﻞ ﳍﺎ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺍﲢﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﺸﺘﺪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻜﺄﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻃﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻃﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ
ﻟﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻟﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ
ﲨﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﻔﺼﻴﻼ
ً
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ
ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻭﺩ ﻭﺍﶈﺰﺯﺍﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻛﺎﻷﺿﻼﻉ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﺮﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﻗﺒﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻶﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺣﺮﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﺇﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻓﺘﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ
ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺬﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻟﺘﺴﺘﻌﲔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﲑﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺩﻗﺔ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺆﺟﺆ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺧﺮﻕ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﲑﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻟﺘﺴﺘﻌﲔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺣﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻗﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ .ﻭﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ
ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻯ ﳌﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺘﻄﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺃﻱ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﲔ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﳑﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺣﱴ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻗﺼﺮ ﺇﺫ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ .ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻤﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻮ ﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺣﻜﻤﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﻘﺔ،
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﳏﺪﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻣﻘﻌﺮﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻓﻔﻴﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﲢﺪﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﺇﱃ
ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺣﲔ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻛﻞ ﺿﻠﻊ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳝﺮ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﻳﻮﻗﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻛﻞ
ﻑ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﺿﻠﻊ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺘﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻛﺎ ٍ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺗﲔ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﻠﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ .ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺗﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻏﲑ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺘﲔ ،ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ
ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺗﲔ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﺭ ﻻﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﻼ ﻉ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﳍﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺿﻴﻘﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ،ﻓﻠﻢ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﺰﺍﻕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﻜﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ،
ﻭﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﻣﺘﻬﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺪﻭﺭ ﰲ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ
ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻧﻘﺮﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ،
ﻭﺍﻻﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺗﲔ
ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺗﲔ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺗﺘﻌﺬﺭ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺿﻠﻊ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻓﲑﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﺩﻕ ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ
ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺿﻠﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﻨﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﻛﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ
ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺗﺪﺧﻼﻥ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﻭﰲ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﺃﻱ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻤﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺎﺭ،
ﻓﺄﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺔ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ،
ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻴﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻭﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻃﻮﻳ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻢ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺇﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﳏﺎﻝ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﳏﺎ ﹰﻻ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﹰﺎ :ﻓﻸﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺑﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻳﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﺰﻕ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺤﺮﻛﺔ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻀﻮﻱ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺗﺎﺭﺓﹰ ،ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ
ﻻ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﲑ ﻓﺒﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻠﺘﺼﻘﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺷﻜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻒ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ
ﺳﻴﻔﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ :ﺧﻨﺠﺮﹰﺍ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳛﺠﺐ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻳﺘﺄﱂ ﺑﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻔﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮ ﻉ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﺿﺮﺍﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺺ ﻫﻮ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻠﺲ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺳﻠﺴﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻧﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ
ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻼﻩ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﺱ ﺻﻐﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺮﺏ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺃﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺮﺍﺽ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﲢﺪﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺺ ﺑﻠﺰﺍﻕ ،ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ
ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﺴﻨﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﳜﻠﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺮ ﺑﺘﺤﺪﻳﺒﻪ ﻭﰲ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺑﺘﻘﻌﲑﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﺟﺎﺋﺰ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﻳﺘﻘﻌﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻋﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺳﻼﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺿﺎﻕ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﻠﻢ ﲡﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺣﺮﻳﺰﺓ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﶈﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻮﻗﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ
ﻫﻲ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺘﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺧﺮﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻳﻮﻗﻰ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﻩ ،ﻓﻼ ﳛﺼﻞ ﳍﻤﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺎﻟﺴﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻴﺘﺴﺘﺮ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻏﺎﺋﺒﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﰎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﻫﺬ ﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻛﺘﻔﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺻﻐﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻴﻌﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﲢﺴﲔ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻻﻩ ﻟﺒﻘﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ
ﻣﺴﺘﻬﺠﻨﹰﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍ ﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ :ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺟﺰﺅﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ
ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﺟﺰﺅﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺳﻄﺤﻪ ﲟﺴﺘﻮﹴ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺍﳋﻂ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﻃﺮﰲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﰐ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﳘﺎ ﺟﺰﺀﺍﻩ .ﻭﺣﺪﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ .ﻭﺗﻘﻌﲑﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ .ﻭﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﺿﻠﻊ
ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻠﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺧﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎﹰ ،ﺑﻞ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺿﻠﻌﹰﺎ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻮﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺿﻠﻌﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ
ﺧﻄﲔ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻳﲔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻄﻌﺎﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺩﻕ ،ﻭﺃﻋﻼﻩ
ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻂ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺜﲔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ
ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﻭﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻠﺘﻘﻰ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺑﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ.
ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ
ﻧﺘﻮﺀﺍﻥ ﳝﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ
ﻋﺮﺽ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻓﺄﺭﻗﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻄﻪ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ
ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻐﻮﺭ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺇﺻﺒﻊ ﻭﻧﺼﻒ ،ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ
ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ،ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻓﺔ
ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺆ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻌﺪﺕ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺛﺨﻦ ﺇﺻﺒﻊ
ﻏﻠﻈﺖ ﻭﺻﻌﺪ ﳍﺎ ﺭﺃﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺃﳕﻠﺔ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﻳﺘﻘﻌﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻄﻮﻝ ﺣﱴ ﲢﺎﺫﻱ ﺭﺃﺱ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺘﻌﺪﺍﻩ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﰒ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﻋﺮﺽ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍ ﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺇﺻﺒﻊ ﻭﻧﺼﻒ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻆ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺩﻗﺘﻪ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﶈﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺻﻐﲑ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﻠﻈﻪ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳍﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻡ ﻭﻣﻨﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺍﺏ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﱪﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻡ :ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻡ .ﻭﻗﻮﻡ :ﻣﻨﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺍﺏ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﱪﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﻘﻮﻡ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ :ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺍﲰﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇﻻ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻣﻌﻨﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﰲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﺃﻭﺳﻊ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺬ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻘﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻄﺢ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺃﺫﻯ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺎﻙ .ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ
ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻳﻐﺸﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺗﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ
ﻭﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﺷﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻣﻌﻨﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﰒ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ
ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﳘﺎ :ﻭﳘﺎ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻡ.
ﻭﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﰲ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻠﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺩﺓ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﺰﺍﻕ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻰ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻔﺼﻼﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ .ﻭﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺑﺮﺃﺱ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻋﻨﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻗﺼﲑ .ﻷﻥ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻐﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ
ﻟﻴﺘﻬﻨﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺃﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻪ
ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺃﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﺛﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺛﻘﻞ ﻣﺎ ﲢﻤﻠﻪ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﻼ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﻒ .ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻬ ﹰ
ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻟﺌﻼ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺣﻔﺮ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻛﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﺮﻣﺎﻧﺘﲔ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻭﺷﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺭﺧﻮ ﺃﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻀﻢ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺃﺭﺑﻄﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﺎﻭﺓ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻧﹰﺎ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻠﺸﺪﺓ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻼﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﺋﻊ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ
ﲟﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺇﺫ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ .ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﺭﺑﻄﺔ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻲ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﺒﺜﻪ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺃﺷﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻣﻨﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﳔﻼﻉ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ،ﻭﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺃﺻﻠﺐ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳛﻮﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻏﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻟﻴﻄﺎﻭﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻼﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ .ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺸﺒﺜﻪ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﱂ
ﻼ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲤﺪﺩ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﲤﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﺳﻬ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﲤﺪﺩﻩ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺻﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻟﻴﻄﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻴﺚ
ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ
ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻬﻦ ﲝﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺛﻘﻠﻬﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻰ ﳏﺪﺏ ...ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻛﺐ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﺃﻱ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺍ ﻧﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ .ﻭﻟﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﳌﺦ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ
ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻳﻔﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ
ﻟﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺘﲔ ﻓﻴﺸﺘﺪ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻯ ،ﻭﺃﺩﻕ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻄﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻠﻈﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﳍﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﺪﺍﺭﻙ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺎﻩ ﻓﻤﺘﺨﻠﺨﻼﻥ ﻟﻼﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺑﻘﻮﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ .ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ،
ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺪﻳﺒﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻨﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ .ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﳌﺪﻓﻮﻧﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﺿﺔ ﻟﻮ ﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳚﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﺑﻂ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﺑﻄﻪ .ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﳌﺸﺘﻤﻞ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﻝ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳚﻮﺩ ﺇﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﳍﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﳌﺸﺘﻤﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻗﻮﺳﹰﺎ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﲔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﳚﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﺑﻂ
ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻘﻌﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻧﺴﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﺭﻛﺐ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﺮﻣﺎﻧﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺘﺎ ﲟﺘﻼﺻﻘﺘﲔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺑﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ
ﻛﺠﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ .ﻷﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﻻ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺷﺊ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺭﻛﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ
ﰲ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻓﺘﻈﻬﺮ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺴﻤﲔ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ .ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺋﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻟﻮ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺴﻄﺢ ﱂ ﳝﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ
ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻊ ﲢﺘﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﻔﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ
ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﶈﺪﺩﺍﻥ ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﻛﺮﻯ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﳐﺮﻭﻁ ،ﻭﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺗﲔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺣﻔﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻫﺎ،
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺨﺮﻭﻁ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﺑﺴﻄﺢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﹴ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﲣﺘﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻀﻌﻒ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺘﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﻤﺴﻮﺍﺓ ﳑﻠﺴﺔ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻸﺧﺮﻯ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻨﺒﻄﺤﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻬﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺋﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ
ﻟﻠﻌﻀﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﺪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ،ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﻄﺎﺣﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﲔ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻼﻥ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻼ ﻟﻠﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻌﺴﺮ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺍﻓﺘﻘﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺜﻘ ﹰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺻﻐﲑ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ
ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﻝ.
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺳﺒﺒﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ،
ﺇﺫ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺟﺮ ﺍﻷﺛﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺘﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻭﺳﻄﻬﻤﺎ ﺧﻠﻮ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻤﺸﺪﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺗﺸﺪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻭﱃ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﻣﻜﺒﻮﺑﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺃﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻻﺳﺘﻐﻨﺎﺋﻪ ﲟﺎ ﳜﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﺍﳌﺜﻘﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﲎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻏﺮﺍﺽ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﻆ
ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻼ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻨﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻃﺮﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻣﻮﺭﹰﺍ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻱ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ.
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﺤﻖ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻜﻢ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺗﻌﺮﻱ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﺛﺨﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ .ﻭﻃﺮﻓﺎﻩ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﲔ ﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ
ﺗﻌﺮﻱ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﲔ ،ﻭﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺣﱴ ﻻ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﻊ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻠﺒﺴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ،ﻓﻴﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜ ﺨﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﻥ؟ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﺒﻴﺲ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﲟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻠﺘﺌﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﺃﺧﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﻄﺎﺣﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ﳏﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻬﺎ
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﻄﺎﺣﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺗﺘﻢ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ
ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻘﻌﺮﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﻭﺧﻠﻔﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺪﻗﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺃﺳﲔ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﲔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﰐ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ
ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﳏﺪﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻖ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﺮﻛﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺘﲔ
ﻟﻠﻨﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺧﻼﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﻄﺖ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺰ ﻧﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ
ﻏﲑ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺘﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺗﲔ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻼﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﻄﺎﺣﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﺘﻢ
ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ
ﻏﲑ ﻏﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺝ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ
ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﻏﲑ ﳑﺎﺱ ﻟﻠﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ
ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﰿ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﻬﻜﺬﺍ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰ ﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﳏﺪﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻣﻘﻌﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻰ ،ﻭﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﳓﻮ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺭﺃﺳﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ،
ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﺃﻛﱪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﳓﻨﺎﺀ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﳏﺪﺑﹰﺎ ﳑﻠﺴﹰﺎ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ
ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﺔ ﲣﺮﺝ
ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻌﲑﻩ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﺪﺑﺔ ﺑﻞ :ﺇﻥ ﺗﻘﻌﲑﻩ ﻛﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﻛﺮﺓ
ﺫﺍﺕ ﺳﻄﺤﲔ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻳﲔ ﺃﻱ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﻟﻘﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺮﺓ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﺘﻬﻨﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻌﺮ ﺭﺃﺱ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﻴﻪ .ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﻌﺒﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﺭﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ
ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﳏﺪﺑﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﶈﺪﺏ ﻣﻘﻌﺮﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﻐﻠﲔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﺸﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻘﻌﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺴﻄﺢ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ
ﺧﻔﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻼﺏ
ﻋﺪﳝﺔ ﺍﳌﺦ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﻘﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﳌﺦ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺻﻐﺮﺍ ﻻ ﲢﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ
ﻭﺃﺷﻜﺎﳍﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﳏﺪﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻘﻌﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻬﺎ
ﳏﺪﺑﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻘﻌﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﻠﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ.
ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺸﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴﺔ ،ﻭﲢﺪﺙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻇﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﺑﺒﻌﺾ .ﻭﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺪﺧﻞ
ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻠﺴﻞ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﺸﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻠﻘﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺟﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ .ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﻌﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻠﻘﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ
ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﻀﻤﺔ .ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺻﻒ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺟﹰﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺳﻎ ﻛﺎﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﳓﻮ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ،ﻭﰲ
ﻼ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﺴﻠﺔ ﻭﻣﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ .ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺮ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻳﻮﻗﻲ ﻋﺼﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻨﺎﳍﺎ ﺁﻓﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﻘ ﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﺸﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ
ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺻﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﺻﻔﺎﻥ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺻﻔﲔ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻀﻪ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻭﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ .ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ،ﻳﻌﲏ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻳﺜﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﻮﻱ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ .ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ
ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ :ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺻﻌﺒﺔ ﻭﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺛﻖ
ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﺧﻔﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺗﻌﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻏﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﲝﺜﹰﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘ ﻼﻑ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ
ﺍﻵﻥ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺪﺍﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ،ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻠﺒﺴﻪ،
ﻭﻣﺄﻛﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺳﻼﺣﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﲤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﹰﺓ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻪ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺪﺍﻩ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﺣﻜﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﻔﻨﻨﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﺗﻔﻨﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ
ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻔﻨﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﺺ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻛﻔﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻔﻨﻨﻬﺎ
ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻞ
ﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﳕﻠﺔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﳑﺎ ﺩﻭﻬﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻐﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ
ﻭﺗﻐﻠﻆ ﻓﻴﻌﺴﺮ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻨﻜﺴﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﳌﺦ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺻﻐﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻟﺘﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻝ
ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ .ﻭﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺪﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻔﻮﺕ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﺃﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻤﺰ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺨﻠﻘﺖ
ﻣﻘﻌﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﳏﺪﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻟﻔﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﶈﺪﺏ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻘﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﺽ
ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﺻﱪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻌﻘﻔﺔ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﳍﺎ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺣﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻟﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﲢﺪﻳﺐ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺧﻠﻞ ﳝﻨﻊ
ﻣﻦ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﻃﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻠﺨﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﲢﺪﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻭﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﻋﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎ
ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﰎ ﻭﺃﻗﻠﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻟﻔﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﲞﺎﺭﺟﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﻳﻼﻣﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﻜﻢ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ .ﻭﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺛﻘﻠﻬﺎ
ﻓﺘﻀﻌﻒ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻓﻠﻔﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﻗﺒﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ
ﻭﰲ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﺳﺪﻩ ﳌﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻭﻟﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﺇﻣﺴﺎﻙ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻤﺴﻮﻙ ﻭﳛﻔﻈﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺩ ﺇﻣﺴﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺻﻐﺮ ﺑﺮﺅﻭﺱ ﺍﻷﻇﻔﺎﺭ ،ﻭﳌﺎ
ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﺻﻐﺮﺕ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ ،ﻭﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺼﲑﹰﺍ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ
ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻃﻮﺍ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻜﻦ ﲞﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑﺓ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺗﺊ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺘﲔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﲝﺬﺍﺀ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ،ﻭﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﺮﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ .ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺔ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﻭﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﺨﻠﻔﺖ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ
ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻗﺎﻭﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ
ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﹰﺍ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻛﺎﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻂ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻭﳍﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻤﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻵﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺒﻀﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﰲ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺟﻔﺎﻑ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﺰﺟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺂﻟﺔ ﻣﺮﺧﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﺌﻼ
ﺗﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺍﺣﺘﻜﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻔﻆ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﺌﻼ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﺹ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﳜﺸﻰ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻞﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ
ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺣﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﺘﻤﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﳍﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.ﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﻓﺨﻠﻔﺖ
ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻠﺖ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻗﺎﻭﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻛﺎﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻂ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻭﳍﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺼﻤﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻵﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺒﻀﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﻄﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺒﻮﺽ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺟﻔﺎﻑ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﻛﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﺰﺟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺂﻟﺔ ﻣﺮﺧﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻨﻊ
ﺍﺣﺘﻜﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺴﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻔﻆ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﺌﻼ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﺹ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﻫﺎ
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻞﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻷﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺣﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﺘﻤﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﳍﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﻔﺮ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﻔﺮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻈﻔﺮ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻸﳕﻠﺔ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻈﻔﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺍﻷﳕﻠﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻳﻨﻀﻐﻂ ﻭﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺪ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻘﻂ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺒﻄﻬﺎ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻈﻔﺮ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﻴﺔ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻚ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺻﻠﺐ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻼﺣﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﳋﺪﺵ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ.
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻳﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻬﻮﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﻣﻞ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻳﻨﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳏﺴﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻻﻩ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﺤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻇﻔﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﻮﺀ
ﻭﻧﺸﻮﺅﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﻃﻮﳍﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﱴ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻭﻳﻄﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺰﻭﻝ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﺯﺩﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺋﺘﻼﻡ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍ ﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻋﲏ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﳉﺰﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻳﺘﺼﻼﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻘﻮﺑﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ ﻓﺮﻏﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻪ .ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﺳﻢ ﳜﺼﻪ .ﻓﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻗﻔﺔ ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﺾ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻊ ،ﻭﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ
ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﳌﺎ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻞ ﳌﺎ ﲢﺘﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺮﳝﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺓ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﺔ ﺑﻪ.
ﻼ ﳌﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ. ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘ ﹰ
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍ ﻟﻔﺨﺬ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳛﺴﻦ ﺑﺴﺒﺒﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﺼﺮ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺴﻨﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳋﺼﺮ
ﺇﱃ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻭﻝ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ....ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻪ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﱪ ﻗﻮﻳﺖ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻪ،
ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺭﻛﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ .ﻭﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻗﺎﻩ ﻭﻗﺪﻣﺎﻩ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺘﲔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻓﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻬﻧﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﻻ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺘﺼﺐ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﲑ ﻓﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻠﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﺷﺎﺑﻪ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ
ﻛﺎﻟﺮﺍﻛﻊ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻭﺭﻛﻪ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻤﻪ ﻭﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ .ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳏﺪﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ .ﻭﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺟﻮﺯﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ
ﺭﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﻖ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ﻭﺩﻭﻥ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ
ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍ ﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻻﺣﻘﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﻘﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﺆ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻧﻘﺮﰐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻮﺯﺗﲔ ﰲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻏﺎﺋﺮ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻔﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﺫﻭ ﻧﻘﺮ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﳊﺪﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺪﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻗﺼﲑﺓ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ
ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻠﻴﻨﻪ ﺻﺒﻮﺭﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﺼﺪﺍﻉ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺭﻗﺘﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﺸﻘﺎﻕ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ
ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻜﺔ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺫﺍ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﲢﺘﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﺜﻮ ﻭﻧﻮﺣﻪ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ
ﻼ
ﻳﻠﺤﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻒ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﺜﻮ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺛﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺣﺪﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻛﺒﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺗﺜﲏ ﺃﺭﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺫﻭ ﺭﺟﻠﲔ .ﻭﻳﺜﻨﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﻮﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﻌﺐ ﺑﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻠﲔ ﻭﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺛﻘﻴﻞ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﻼ
ﻼ ﻟﻴﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﻃﺆ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻭﻳﻌﺎﻭﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻴﺠﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺃﺛﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻠﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳍﺮﻡ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻪ
ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳜﻒ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺜﻘﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﻟﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻰﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﶈﺪﺑﺎﺕ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺮﻓﻊ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﺎﹰ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﻓﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺛﻘﻴﻞ
ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻮﻋﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻭﻡ ﺍﳌﻴﻼﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻔﻘﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ
ﳝﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺸﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻞ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻄﺮﻑ
ﻼ.
ﺍﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺣﱴ ﲤﻜﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﻣﻦ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺯﻟﻨﺎ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺘﲔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﺪﻋﻮﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ :ﳝﻴﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺰﻳﻠﺔ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺯﺍﻟﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻴﺰﻭﻝ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻜﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ
ﻼ ﻷﻧﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﲡﺮ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺗﺮﻓﻊ ﺑﺘﻘﻠﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺗﻘﻠﺼﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻗﺪ ﳝﻴﻞ
ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﱂ ﳚﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻳﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ ﻓﻴﺴﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ،ﻻ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺑﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻘﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﺘﻤﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﲤﻜﻨﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﻮﻑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ
ﻭﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻣﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺘﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ،ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ.
ﻭﳓﻦ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ .ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ﻓﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺗﻜﻌﻴﺒﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺷﺪ ﻬﺗﻨﺪﻣﹰﺎ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻟﺮﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺪﻣﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻰﺀ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﳔﻔﺎﺽ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻳﺔ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﺎﻗﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ
ﻭﺇﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻠﺴﹰﺎ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮﻬﺗﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺑﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﻣﺼﺎﻛﺔ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻟﻸﺧﺮﻯ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺧﻠﻔﹰﺎ .ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ
ﻗﺪﺍﻣﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻌﺴﺮ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﲟﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﳝﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﲢﺮﻙ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺃﺷﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺛﺨﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻗﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﻳﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻗﺼﺒﱵ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﳊﻔﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻭﺍﳊﻔﺮﺓ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳋﻔﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﲝﻔﺮﺗﲔ ﰲ
ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﺴﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳔﻔﺎﺿﻪ ﻋﺴﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﻻ
ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ﻣﺸﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﺸﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻃﺮﻓﺎﻩ ﻳﺮﺗﻜﺰﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﳝﻨﻪ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﻩ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﲑﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﲑﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻘﺼﺒﱵ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ .ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﳏﻴﻄﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺘﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻌﺒﲔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﳘﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺭﻗﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺐ ﻭﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻷﲬﺺ .ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ .ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻕ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻈﲑ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ
ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﺫ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺘﻢ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﻡ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﳓﻮ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﲬﺼﻪ ﺟﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳚﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﲬﺺ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺭﻗﻲ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ،ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﻪ .ﺣﱴ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻭﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﳌﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺮﺟﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻓﺎﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳌﻮﻃﺆ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﰲ ﺻﻒ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﻬﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﻘﺼﺖ ﺳﻼﻣﻴﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻳﻬﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ :ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ :ﳘﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﻓﻮﺥ.
ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ :ﻛﺎﳉﺪﺭﺍﻥ.
ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ :ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ.
ﻭﻭﺍﺣﺪ :ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺪﻱ.
ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻤﺔ ﺳﺘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﺎﻥ،
ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻠﺜﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ .ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ.
ﻭﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ :ﺳﺒﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ .ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ،ﻭﲬﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﻭﺛﻼﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ،ﻭﺛﻼﺙ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﺿﻠﻌﹰﺎ :ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﻠﺘﻘﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﲬﺴﺔ ﻗﺼﺎﺭ ﻫﻦ
ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ.
ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ .ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻈﻤﺎﻥ.
ﻭﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻳﺪ ﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ :ﻋﻀﺪ ﻭﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﻭﲬﺴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ :ﻓﺨﺬ ،ﻭﻗﺼﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺿﻔﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻌﺐ ،ﻭﻋﻘﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ،
ﻭﲬﺴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ،ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ.
ﻭﺯﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻋﻈﻤﲔ ﻭﳘﺎ ﺭﺃﺳﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻔﲔ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻣﺎﺋﺘﲔ ﻭﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻌﲔ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.ﰎ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ
ﻼ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﺼ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲪﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﲪﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻭﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺛﻘ ﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺒﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳏﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﺣﺸﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺃﻟﻴﺎﻓﻬﺎ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺻﻠﺐ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻘﻠﺺ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﺑﺮﺩﹰﺍ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻣﻌﺘﺪ ﹰﻻ ﻟﱪﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻛﺎﶈﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻌﺎﺵ ﻓﻴﻀﻌﻒ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻠﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻼ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻼ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍ ﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ....ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻞ ﳜﺼﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻛﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺗﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ
ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﺬﻭﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ .ﻭﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﲨﻠﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺪ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﻋﲏ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻮﻋﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻨﺎ
ﻋﻀﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳋﺪ ،ﻭﻋﻀﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻧﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻟِﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ
ﺧﻔﻴﻒ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺮﺿﺔ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻢ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ
ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﳓﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺑﻞ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺗﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ
ﺇﻻ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺇﺫ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﳒﺬﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺟﺰﺀ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ
ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻪ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺇﺫ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ
ﺇﱃ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺛﺨﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﺪ ﰲ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ ﺍﳉﺒﻬﺔ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻜﺮﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻠﻖ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﺮﻗﺘﻬﺎ
ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻠﺪ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺣﱴ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﲨﻠ ﹰﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﹰﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﱵ
ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ.
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﲔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻛﺎﳋﻠﺪ .ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻔﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ،ﺃﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﲔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻠﺪﻩ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺟﻔﻦ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ،
ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻐﻤﻴﺾ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻠﺪﻩ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ.
ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﺡ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺻﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻳﻐﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ،
ﻭﻳﻜﺸﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﺡ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻠﺪﻩ ﻟﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ،
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻔﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺄﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﻐﻤﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺘﺮﻩ ﺃﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺑﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺒﻄﻞ ﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﺼﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺎﻳﺎﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﺪﻝ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺇﻥ ﻋﲏ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﻨﻮﻉ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻖ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ
ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ .ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺑﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﳏﺮﻛﺔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻨﺔ
ﻓﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﻬﺎ ﻟﺘﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻓﺘﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻔﺪﻩ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻞ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ،ﻭﻋﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻳﺮﻓﻌﻪ .ﻭﺍ ﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻠﺠﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﱵ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻐﻤﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ
ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻠﺠﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﳝﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳋﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳋﺪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﺓ ﻟﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﻊ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻟﻺﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺸﺮﻛﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﹼﺔ .ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ
ﺇﱃ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﺘﲔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻟﻀﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺴﺮ.
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﻨﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺗﻔﻨﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺸﻔﺘﲔ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﻨﻨﺔ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺥ ﺍﳋﺪ
ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﻭﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻋﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ
ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺻﻐﺮﻩ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﻷﺭﻧﺒﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻻﺭﺗﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺽ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﹰﺍ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ
ﺇﱃ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﺘﲔ .ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﳌﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻐﲑ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﲔ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻐﲑ
ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺃﻭﱃ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺻﻐﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻋﺴﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ
ﻼ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻔﺘﲔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺻﻠﺐ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻮ ﹰﻻ ﺳﻬ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺺ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﺎﺡ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺮﻙ ﻓﻜﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺑﹰﺎ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﺧﻒ ،ﻭﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻷﺧﻒ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺃﺳﻬﻞ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺧﻒ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺗﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻷﻧﻪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺮﳝﺔ
ﻼ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ. ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﻘﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺮﳝﺔ ﻟﻴﻨﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺗﻀﺮ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﳌﺎ
ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ .ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻷﻥ
ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ .ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺳﻠﺴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺄﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺰ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﺘﻬﻴﺄ
ﻟﻼﳔﻼﻉ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺛﻘﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳔﻼﻋﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ
ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﻘﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﺗﻰ ﻣﻊ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﻣﺘﻤﻜﻨﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﲟﻨﻊ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻌﹰﺎ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺁﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻋﻦ ﲰﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻗﺒﺢ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﺎﺡ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺅﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﻭﻳﺪﺍﻩ ﺧﻔﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﺪ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ،ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﻧﺸﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺘﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﺑﻀﻌﻒ
ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻛﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ
ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻀﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺶ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﻀﺎﺩﺓ ﳊﺮﻛﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﺎﺡ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺾ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺃﺳﻨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻛﻤﻨﺸﺎﺭﻳﻦ ،ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻔﺮ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺇﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰒ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﻭﺇﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻔﻐﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﺇﻃﺒﺎﻗﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ
ﻹﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﳊﺮﻭﻑ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻟﺴﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺃﻭ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺾ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﻭﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺳﺤﻖ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﺈﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﻓﻠﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺳﻨﺎﻥ
ﻭﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ .ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﺮ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﺬ ﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻻ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ ﻻﻓﺘﻘﺮﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺟﻠﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺒﺢ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻋﺼﺐ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ
ﻟﺘﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻟﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﺎ
ﻳﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﻣﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻀﺮﺭﻩ ﻣﺆﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﻗﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ .ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺎﺗﺮ
ﻳﺴﺘﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﺩﻱ ﻓﺨﻠﻘﺖ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ .ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺼﻐﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺾ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﺄﻛﻠﻪ ﺻﻨﺎﻋﻲ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ،ﻭﻓﻜﻪ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺃﻗﻞ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺻﻐﲑﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﺴﺮ ﺭﻓﻊ
ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻄﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﻀﺔ
ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ،ﻭﲤﺘﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺘﺤﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻄﻴﻴﻒ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻗﻮﻱ .ﻭﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻣﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﱵ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ
ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﱵ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﻣﻨﻌﻮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻓﻐﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍ ﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﻭﺇﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺘﲔ ﻣﺴﺘﻄﻴﻠﺘﲔ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺍﲢﺪﺗﺎ ﻭﺻﺎﺭﺗﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﰒ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻓﺈﺫ ﺍ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻗﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺶ ﻛﺮﺓ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻤﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﻼ
ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺣﺶ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻘﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﻼ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺧﻠﻒ .ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ .ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻐﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳛﺘﺸﻲ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﱪﺩ
ﻼ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﻭﻳﺘﻐﲑ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻋﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻋﺮﺿﺎﹰ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺮﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺘﲔ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ
ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﻠﺺ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﲢﺎﺩﳘﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻗﻦ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﺶ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺵ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺘﺸﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻔﺶ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ
ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﻛﻼﻡ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻳﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﺬﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ
ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻃﺮﻓﺎﳘﺎ ﳊﻤﻲ ﻭﻭﺳﻄﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺮﻱ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺸﺎﺣﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﻭﺗﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﺛﺎﻗﺔ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﺶ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ.
ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﺮﺭ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻔﺎﺵ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ
ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻢ ﺃﻭﱃ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ
ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ .ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﱵ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ ﺗﻠﺒﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﲤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺑﺮﺃﺳﻴﻬﻤﺎ
ﻭﺗﺮﺗﻘﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ .ﻭﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ .ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﱵ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺎﺭ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﳊﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺗﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻴﺔ .ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻓﺴﺎﺩ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﲢﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻨﻘﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻻ ﺇﱃ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺮﻭﺳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﳑﻜﻨﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺔ
ﻫﻮ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻬﺎ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﻬﺎ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺭﺃﺳﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﻋﻴﻨﻬﺎ
ﺇﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺑﺪﻬﻧﺎ ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﺨﺮﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ
ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺑﺈﺣﺪﻯ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺁﻓﺔ ﲤﻨﻊ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻄﻠﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﱂ ﺗﻒ ﺑﺎﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ .ﺇﺫ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺭﺧﻮﹰﺍ ﺳﻠﺴﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ،
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﻛﺔ ﺧﺮﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ .ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﳊﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺔ،
ﻭﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﳊﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ.
ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﰲ ﲝﺚ ﳜﺼﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ...
ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻜﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺲ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﻼ ﲟﺎ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻘﻠﺼﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺘﲔ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺟﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻟﻜﱪﻩ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺮﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﺿﺪﺓ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﲔ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ
ﳜﻠﻖ ﻟﻜﻞ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻜﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ
ﻼ ﻬﺑﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻜﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻜﻴﺴﻪ
ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﺣﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﻔﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ،ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻜﻴﺲ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ
ﻼ ﻋﻦﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﻴﻖ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﺼ ﹰ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻼ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻷﻥﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻮﺳﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻟﻠﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺺ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﻫﻦ ﻻﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ
ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻳﺼﲑ ﳍﺎ ﺭﺃﺳﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻋﺼﱯ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﳊﻤﻲ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺳﲔ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ .ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻟﻠﱵ ﳍﺎ
ﺭﺃﺳﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺁﻥ ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﱪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﺜﺮﻭﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﻢ
ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﻮﻭﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﳌﺼﺎﺭﻋﲔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﻢ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻼ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻷ ﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺍﺗﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﻫﺒﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﲢﺖ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺃﻱ ﲢﺘﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﻘﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻨﻜﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ
ﻷﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﺳﺔ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ
ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﳘﺎ ﳊﻤﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺘﺄﺫﻯ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﲟﻤﺎﺳﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻛﺘﺎ
ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺗﻨﻜﺴﺎ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺃﻋﻼﳘﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺗﻨﻜﺲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﰲ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﺒﺜﺎﻕ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ،
ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺗﺴﺎﻣﺖ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻏﲑ ﻓﺼﻴﺤﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺑﺴﻄﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺳﻄﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﻧﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻜﺲ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺲ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳚﺘﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ
ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻓﺜﻼﺛﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﻮﻥ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﲦﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ :ﻓﺎﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺑﻞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ .ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ،
ﻼ
ﻭﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﻋﺼﺒﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺳﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍ ﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻱ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﲔ ﺟﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ
ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﳝﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺎﹰ ،ﻭ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ،ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﲰﺎﳘﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ :ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻼ ﺑﲔ ﻃﺮﰲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺳﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﺍﺻ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﲔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺻﻐﲑ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ .ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻨﺒﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ:
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺄﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻣﺪﺳﻮﺳﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺪﺳﻮﺳﺔ ﲢﺘﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ
ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﺣﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻧﺪﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﲢﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻨﺒﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻳﻌﲏ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻠﻘﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻄﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﹰﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﻣﻨﺒﺖ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻫﻮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺒﺘﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﰐ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﺒﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺯﻭﺝ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺳﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻮﻕ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﻗﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﻘﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻄﻨﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺁﺗﻴﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺠﻌﻞ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻨﺴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ
ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬ ﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺍﳔﺴﺎﻓﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ
ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺷﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﳔﺴﺎﻑ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺔ ﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺧﺎﺻﻴﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻻ
ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺃﺱ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻻ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺗﲔ ،ﺑﻞ
ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ .ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﻭﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺰﻋﺰﻉ
ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻟﻮ ﻣﺎﻟﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ
ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ .ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﹰﺎ ﺑﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﺸﺪﺍﺥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻟﻴﻘﺎﻭﻡ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺣﲔ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻪ ﻟﻠﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﻭﲤﻴﻴﻠﻪ ﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﺒﻄﻞ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ
ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ.
ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻯ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺘﻪ؟ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻩ
ﻼ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻓﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻋﲏ ﲢﺘﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻄﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻷﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺼﻐﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺭﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﻼ
ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻳﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻻ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ،
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺃﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﻝ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﹰﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻣﻨﻘﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ.
ﺑﻘﻲ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺃﻥ ﱂ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻣﺆﺭ ﺑﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﺫ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﻬﺑﺎ
ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺑﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ؟ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﺗﺄﺭﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ
ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﺳﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﳉﻠﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﺆﳌﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ
ﻣﺆﳌﹰﺎ.
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﻀﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﻛﺔ ﻭﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺴﻨﺔ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺯﻭﺟﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ
ﳒﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳝﺘﺪ ﲜﻨﺐ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ،ﻭﻳﺼﲑ
ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ؟ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﻨﺒﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﺎﻥ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ؟ ﻭﻫﻼ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﺋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ
ﺃﺣﺮﺯ ﳍﺎ؟ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻐﺮ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ؟ ﻭﻫﻼ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ
ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ؟ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻸﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﻓﻸﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺛﻘﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ
ﲟﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻋﺰﻉ ﻟﻜﻼﻝ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺸﺒﺜﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ
ﻛﺎﻷﻃﻨﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺛﻘﻠﻪ
ﻭﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﳌﺜﻘﻞ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻋﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﳝﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻭﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺳﻠﺲ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺗﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻔﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﻦ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺇﻳﺜﺎﻗﹰﺎ ﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳋﻠﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻠﺴﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﺎﻗﺔ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﹰﺎ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻗﻠﻘﹰﺎ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻫﻮ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺛﻘﻞ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ.
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺪ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﳓﻮ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ .ﻭﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ،ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺷﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﰲ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲞﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻬﺑﻴﺌﺔ ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺘﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ
ﺑﺄﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ .ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻘﺮﻋﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺎﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺻﻮﺕ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﺘﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻼﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ
ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻭﻏﻠﻆ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻻ ﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ..ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻟﺬﻳﺬﹰﺍ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺁﻣﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻻﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ :ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ.
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪ ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺼﺪﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ﻷﻥ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﲞﻠﻘﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ.
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺘﺬﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺣﱴ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻀﻴﻖ ﻳﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﺮﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﳉﺪﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻄﻨﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻕ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻲ .ﻭﱂ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺗﻌﻈﻴﻢ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻌﻢ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ ﲢﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺝ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻀﻢ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻀﻴﻖ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺮﺍﺝ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ
ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳝﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﴰﺎﻻﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻬﻴﺌﺎﹰ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻤﺎﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻣﻘﺒﺒﺎﹰ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ.ﺷﻜﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺪﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻀﻴﻘﻬﺎ
ﻭﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﳝﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰒ ﳌﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳝﺮ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﳘﺎ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﻔﺠﺮﺟﹰﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻟﺴﻘﻂ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ،ﺃﻭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ .ﻓﻼﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺴﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺮﻭﺏ.
ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ .ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻀﻢ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻄﺎﻭﻉ ﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﳘﺎ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺏ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺜﲏ ﺑﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻴﺤﺼﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺳﺪﻩ ﺗﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﲤﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺪ
ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﻠﺴﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺒﻂﺀ ﻓﻴﺴﺒﻘﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻀﻴﻖ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴﺪﻩ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺿﺮﺭ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺏ ،ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺫ ﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺎﹰ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ
ﻼ ﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺑ ﹰ
ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﲝﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﶈﺘﺒﺲ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ
ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻧﺎﺷﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﱯ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﱯ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﱯ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻀﻌﻒ
ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﲔ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﹰﺎ
ﳏﻜﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﲝﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ...ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻭﻓﺘﺢ ﻭﺗﻮﺳﻴﻊ ﻭﺗﻀﻴﻴﻖ ﻭﺳﺘﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ
ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻣﻀﻎ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻞ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻴﲔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ
ﰲ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ
ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﲬﺲ ﺃﺿﻠﻊ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺮﺉ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻷﺻﻞ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺿﻼﻋﻪ.
ﻭﺿﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺿﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ :ﻭﺳﻨﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﳌﺴﺎﻝ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻼﻥ ﺃﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺸﺒﺚ ﺑﻜﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ :ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ .ﻭﻗﻮﻡ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻧﻪ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭﻱ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻭ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺘﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺭﺑﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺩﻗﻴﺔ ﻣﺪﻭﺭﺓ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻀﻠﻌﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﲔ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻹﺑﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ
ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺃﻃﻮﻝ ،ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻀﻠﻌﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﲔ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﻱ ،ﻭﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻷﻥ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻷﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺿﻼﻋﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻌﹰﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ،
ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺃﺿﻼﻋﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﲜﺎﻧﱯ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻗﻦ ﰒ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻰ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻹﺑﺮﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ
ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ
ﻛﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ .ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺁﻓﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﻓﻴﺤﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺃﺿﻼﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﹰﺎ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺗﻜﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻮﺳﻄﻪ ﻓﺨﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﻟﺘﻘﻮﻡ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﺁﻓﺔ ،ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻐﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻮﻫﻦ ﻟﺜﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻳﻀﻢ...
ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻳﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺘﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻞ ﳝﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﺔ
ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺘﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻞ
ﺗﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻭﺗﻄﺒﻘﻪ ﻓﺘﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻳﻮﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﻓﺘﻨﺘﻔﺦ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺟﺖ
ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻋﻀﻞ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ.
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ.
ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ :ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻊ ﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻀﻠﻊ ،ﻭﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻓﺎﺗﺴﻌﺖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﲡﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﲢﺖ ،ﻭ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﻱ،
ﻭﳝﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﲢﺖ ،ﻓﺎﺗﺴﻌﺖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻹﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﻀﻴﻖ ﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ
ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﰒ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﻳﻠﺘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺤﺪ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ
ﺿﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺘﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺯﻭﺝ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ ﻓﻠﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﺯﻭﺟﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻪ ﺯﻭﺟﲔ ﻭﻳﺼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺯﻭﺟﲔ ﺭﲟﺎ ﻇﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ،
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﻟﻴﺘﻌﺎﺿﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻊ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻌﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻀﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻡ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ
ﻣﺎ ،ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﲢﺎﻭﻝ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﺩﺧﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻀﻴﻴﻖ
ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺢ ﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺗﺄﺗﻰ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﺤﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻪ
ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺘﺎ ﺭﻓﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻓﺘﱪﺃ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﺘﺼﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﲜﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﻓﻌﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﻟﻴﺘﻌﺎﺿﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺒﻄﻮﺡ ﲜﺬﺏ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻭ ﲜﺬﺑﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﺴﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ.
ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺃﻭﱃ .ﻭﻛﻼ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﻳﻠﺘﺤﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻱ
ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ :ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻖ ﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻃﺒﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺬﺏ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ.
ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻀﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺟﺒﹰﺎ ﳋﻠﻞ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳊﻨ ﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﻀﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻐﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻹﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﹰﺎ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺣﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻐﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩﻩ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺯﻭﺟﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ،
ﻭﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ .ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﺧﺬﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻟﻴﺘﺼﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﲔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ
ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻲ ﻟﻠﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺘﺤﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳑﺮﳘﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﳏﺪﺛﹰﺎ ﻟﻼﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻣﻮﺟﺒﹰﺎ ﻻﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺪ
ﳏﻜﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺻﻐﲑ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ
ﻳﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺤﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻓﻴﺄﰐ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ
ﺍﳌﻔﺘﺤﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻌﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺃﺑﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﻠﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﻌﺪ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﺔ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ.
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﻠﻘﻮﻡ ﻻ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺄﻋﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻓﺄﻋﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲤﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﻝ ﻻ ﲤﺪﺩ
ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ
ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻀﻴﻘﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻮ ﺳﻂ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻓﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ
ﻟﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻠﻘﻮﻡ ﲨﻠﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﳊﻠﻘﻮﻡ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺇﺫ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻠﻘﻮﻡ ﻭﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ .ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ :ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻓﺎﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻐﺎﻧﻎ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺗﺴﺨﲔ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺇﺩﻓﺎﺋﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﱪﺩ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻉ ﺃﻛﱪ،
ﻭﻧﻈﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺰﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻼﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﻊ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻓﻴﻌﺴﺮ ﻧﺰﻭﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸﲑ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ
ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺛﻘﻠﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺳﻌﺘﻪ
ﻭﺿﻴﻘﻪ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﲤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻴﻴﻖ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﰲ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﲑﺍﻉ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻳﺮ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺗﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻌﻈﻴﻤﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﲑﺍﻉ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻋﻀﻞ ﲢﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﻠﻤﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﻬﺬﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﳍﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻴﻴﻖ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ :ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﻳﻨﺰﻻﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻤﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ،ﻭﺗﺄﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺘﲔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﲨﻌﺖ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺿﻤﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﳒﺬﺏ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻓﺎﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ.
ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺑﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻷﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺗﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﺸﺒﺜﹰﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ
ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻀﻴﻴﻖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﲢﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﳏﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻘﺼﲑ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺦ ﻓﺠﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻀﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻘﺼﺮﺓ ﳍﺎ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﺸﺮ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﺮﳛﻨﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ .ﺇﺫ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﻨﻨﺔ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻣﻀﻎ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﲑ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺟﻮﺩ ﳍﺎ.
ﻓﺎﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻴﺔ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﲜﺎﻧﺐ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﳛﺮﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﻌﺮﺿﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺩﻗﺘﻪ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺩﱏ ﻗﻮﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺯﻭﺟﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﳋﻔﺘﻪ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺮﺍﺽ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ .ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻧﺸﺊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻚ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍ ﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﺎﻟﺌﹰﺎ ﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﺎﻧﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻚ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﺸﺊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﺧﺬﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ .ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ
ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﹰﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﺧﺬﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲰﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻧﺸﺊ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﻄﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﻓﻌﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳛﻄﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲤﺪﺩ ﺿﻐﻂ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﺒﻌﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻭﻗﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺈﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺍﳊﻴﺔ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻟﺴﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺕ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻟﺴﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻣﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﺛﻨﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺏ ﻗﻠﻤﺎ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﺍﳌﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﺿﻠﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ
ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻻ ﳚﺎﺫﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺑ ﻞ ﻳﻨﺰﻻﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﺍﺏ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﺢ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ
ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻧﺸﺊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﺒﻠﻎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ
ﻟﻠﺤﺲ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﳝﺘﺪ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻗﻦ .ﻭﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮ ﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﻗﺒﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ
ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﳚﺬﺏ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﻼﺀ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻣﺎ
ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﳌﺎ ﳛﻮﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﳝﺔ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ
ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﺰﻭﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻪ ﻭﺍﻫﻴﹰﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﺒﺾ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ
ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺯﻭﺝ :ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ ،ﻭﺗﺼﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ،ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ،ﻭﻣﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﲜﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻊ ﻃﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻟﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﲜﺰﺋﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻓﻌﻞ
ﺑﺎﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺴﻄﻪ .ﻭﺑﺴﻂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﻟﻠﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﻳﻌﺪ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﹰﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ
ﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﺒﺴﻄﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺒﹰﺎ ﻻﳒﺬﺍﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻳﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻻﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﹰﺍ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻛﺎ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﻠﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺑﻄﲔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻳﺒﻄﻠﻪ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﺳﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻀﺎﺩ ﻟﻠﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ .ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻭﺿﻴﻖ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻌﺴﺮ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺗﺒﺴﻄﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺯﻭﺝ ﲢﺖ ﻛﻞ ﺗﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺧﻔﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺷﻴﻠﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﺻﻐﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺑﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﱄ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﻨﺎ ﺯﻭﺝ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﻠﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻠﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻠﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺣﱴ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺿﻠﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺄﺿﻼﻉ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺒﺴﻄﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ،ﻭﳝﺮ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻭﲤﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ،ﻭﳝﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻤﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ ﻭﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺒﺴﻄﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺧﺼﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺳﺘﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳑﺘﺪ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﲨﻌﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﺷﺪﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳑﺘﺪ ﰲ ﺟﻨﱯ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ.
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺿﻤﺖ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ
ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻂ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﺴﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻓﻴﺘﻢ ﺑﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﲤﺪﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻋﻀﻠﻪ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻤﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺒﺾ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﺾ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻄﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻋﺎﺩ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻻ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻭﻟﻮ
ﺻﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺒﺾ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺷﺮﻁ
ﰲ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺗﻘﺒﻀﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ
ﻭﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻞ ﺿﻠﻌﲔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻳﺴﺪ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﺸﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻭﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﹰﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻘﹰﺎ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻷﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻧﻔﻊ ﰲ ﻓﻌﻞ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺁﺗﻴﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﺻ ﹰ
ﺳﺎﺩﹰﺍ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻼ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ. ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺁﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺻ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻗﺒﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﺭﻳﺐ .ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺎﺑ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺳﻬ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﻼ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻗﺒﻮ ﹰﻻ ﺳﻬ ﹰ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﺎﹰ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺎﺑ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﲔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﻋﺪﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻞ ﺿﻠﻌﲔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ،
ﻭﺑﲔ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ،ﻭﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﺿﻠﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ
ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﲦﺎﻧﲔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ.
ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺗﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺟﺰﺀ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻭﺱ
ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻞ ﺿﻠﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺟﻪ .ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ.
ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻞ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻟﻴﺎﻑ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﺎﺳﻂ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺎﺑﺾ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻟﻴﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺎﺑﺾ .ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﺎﺳﻂ،
ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﰲ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺻﻐﲑ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲡﺬﺏ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺃﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺷﺮ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ.
ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﲡﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻫﻲ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺃﺩﺧﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺁﻻﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻞ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻄﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺭﻓﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ
ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺗﺼﻠﺖ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻟﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺴﺮ ﻣﺆﱂ ﻭﺃﻭﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ :ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺰﻳﻖ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻖ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺑﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ،ﻷﻥ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺘﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺑﺎﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻲ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ .ﻭﻭﺗﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ
ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺭﻗﺘﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻓﺎﻉ .ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﳝﺮ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄﻩ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﳝﺮ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄﻩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺃﻥ ﻟﻸﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻴﻒ ﺟﺰﺋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺟﺰﺋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻭﻛﻼ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ
ﻛﺒﲑﺍﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻬﺎ .ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻹﺑﻂ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﺟﺬﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄ ﺑﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﳚﺬﺏ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ .ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺁﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺃﻭ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻭﺗﺮ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺤﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻭ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻗﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺜﻘﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻈﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺄﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﻼ ﻷﻥ ﻟﻴﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺰﺅﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺭﺍﻓﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺰﺅﻫﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺧﺎﻓﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺍﳉﺰﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﺃﻗﺒﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺧﻔﺾ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ
ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺒﻄﻠﻪ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﺎﻓﺄ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺗﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻛﻮﻥ
ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﱪ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺫﺍﻫﺒﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺑﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﻀﻠﱵ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺗﺘﺼﻼﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﲬﺲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﻭ ﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﰒ ﲤﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ
ﺍﻹﺑﻂ ﺻﻌﺪﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻮﺗﺮ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ:
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ.
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺿﻠﻮﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ،ﻻﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ
ﻷﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻄﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻬﺎ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺗﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻏﻠﻈﹰﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻌﺖ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﺮﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺟﻬﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ ،ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻨﻜﺸﻂ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﺦ ﻓﻼ
ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﳍﻢ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﺍﻹﺑﻂ ﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩﺕ ﻏﻠﻈﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻲ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ
ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ .ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺑﺘﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﲢﺘﺞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻄﻮﳍﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺼﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻻ
ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﲬﺲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﳝﺘﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﻩ ﳊﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﱂ ﳜﺘﻒ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﳊﻢ ،ﱂ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺴﻄﺢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺴﻨﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻳﻌﺪﻩ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺎﳌﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻭﳊﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﻌﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﲬﺲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﺽ
ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﻭﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ،
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﲤﻸ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻷﻥ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﺍﳌﻮ ﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺸﻐﻠﻪ ﳊﻤﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﲤﻸ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ .ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺮﺃﺱ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﺒﻌﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﺒﻌﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺮﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﲤﻴﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺸﻐﻠﻪ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ.
ﻭﺃﻇﻦ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ،ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﻣﺸﺘﺒﻜﺔ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻨﺸﺄﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻇﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ
ﻭﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲤﻴﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﲢﺸﻮ ﺗﻘﻌﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ
ﻼ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ
ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﲢﺮﻙ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺭﺃﺳﲔ .ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﻪ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺯﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﻠﻲّ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ
ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻗﺒﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﺯﻭﺝ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﻜﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻞ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ،
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻗﺒﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻀﻬﺎ ﲜﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺘﻪ ﻭﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ
ﲜﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻨﺒﺴﻄﹰﺎ.
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻊ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻮﻯ .ﺇﺫ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻣﻨﻌﹰﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻱ ﻟﻠﻮﺳﻂ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﻊ ﻟﻠﻤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﺇﺫ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻣﻨﻌﹰﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻼ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻀﺎﺩﺓ ﳉﻬﺔ ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﻧﻈﲑﻬﺗﺎ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺘﲔ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻴﻠﲔ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﺒﻘﻰ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﱃ
ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻌﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ
ﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﳉﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﳎﻠﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﺪ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺇﺫ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﳍﺎ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺑﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻮﻉ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺘﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻼﺕ
ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ
ﻓﺄﻧﻮﺍﻋﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﻴﻂ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ
ﻫﻨﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﳊﻢ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﻳﺴﺘﺮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﺣﺸﻮ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ
ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﻠﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻌﲔ ﺍﳉﻨﺒﻴﲔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺗﺴﻄﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﳐﺘ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻭﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻘﺼﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﲝﺴﻦ ﻭﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻏﻠﻆ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﻋﺴﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍ ﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ...ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﺤﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﺾ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ .ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ .ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺣﻴﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻣﻘﺒﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﺗﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺔ
ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻘﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻳﻖ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻘﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﰒ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻭﲤﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺼﻔﻪ ﰒ ﺗﻌﻠﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺭﺍﻛﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﺍﺗﺼﻠﺖ
ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ
ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﺘﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻷﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲤﺘﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﺗﺼﲑ ﺑﺘﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺁﺧﺬﺓ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻟﻮ
ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻌﺮﺿﺔ ﻟﻼﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻐﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻷﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻂ ﻓﺄﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻔﻪ ﰒ ﻳﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﱴ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻏﻠﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻷﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻱ ﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﻜﺒﺎﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﺤﺔ
ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻓﺰﻭﺝ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﺈﳚﺎﻬﺑﺎ ﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻄﺎﺡ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ،ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ
ﻗﺼﺮﺕ ﻓﻠﻢ ﺗﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﺍﺿﻄﺮﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﺘﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺣﱴ
ﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻪ ﻣﺘﺠﻬﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﲟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳍﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ،ﻭﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﺯﻡ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻻ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻷﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺍ ﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺸﺪ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﺤﺔ ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻜﺒﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﲑﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳍﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ
ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﺤﺔ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺳﻎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻓﺰﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻦ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ،ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺘﻴﻪ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﻦ :ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺃﻋﲏ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﻂ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻂ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺑﺴﻄﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ
ﻛﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﻦ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ.
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺑﺴﻄﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻗﻔﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺴﻄﺘﺎ
ﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ
ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﻭﻳﺘﻔﺮﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺑﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﺴﻄﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺑﺴﻄﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻫﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻬﻢ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﻴﺒﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﺮﺳﻎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻓﺰﻭﺝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ .ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻂ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺴﺤﺐ ﻗﺒﻀﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻣﻊ
ﻗﻠﺐ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻔﺎﻩ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻭﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻼ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﺿﹰﺎﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻀﺖ ﺍ ﻟﻜﻒ ﻣﻜﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻧﻜﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺍﻧﻜﺒﺎﺑﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻗﻼﺑﹰﺎ ﺗﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﺴﺖ ﺃﻓﻬﻤﻪ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻜﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﺢ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﺾ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻟﺼﻐﺮﻩ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻠﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻛﻠﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ
ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺎﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻐﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻻ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺤﺼﻨﺖ ﺑﺄﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ :ﻓﺤﺼﻨﺖ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺑﺄﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﲔ ﻫﻮ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺤﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺤﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺣﺼﻨﺖ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻟﺘﻮﻗﻲ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺆﺫ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﺎﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﻨﻒ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺆﳌﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﺇﱃ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺮﺿﺖ ﻟﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻠﻖ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﻳﺎﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ
ﺗﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻐﲑ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﻓﺜﻼﺙ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﱂ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺷﺎﻟﺔ ﺍ ﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﺃﻋﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻄﻪ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻹﻣﺴﺎﻙ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ﻭﺟﺮ ﺍﻷﺛﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻛﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻔﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ
ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ .ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻨﺐ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﻴﺎﺕ
ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﺜﻼﺙ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲤﻴﻴﻞ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﲤﻴﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻷﻥ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻛﺎﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻤﺴﻮﻙ
ﻭﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺇﻣﺴﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺭﻓﻊ ﺛﻘﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﺴﻮﻙ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻀﻼﻬﺗﺎ ﻛﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ،
ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻻ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺻﻐﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻟﻜﻦ
ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻛﻔﻰ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺛﻼﺛﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺣﺮﻛﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﺎﻥ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻀﻠﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﲔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ
ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺳﻄﻰ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻕ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺎ
ﺻﻐﲑﺗﲔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻨﺼﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻜﺎﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﲪﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻏﲑﳘﺎ .ﻓﺄﻣﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﳌﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ .
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺜﻼﺙ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﳎﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﳍﺎ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺳﻄﻰ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ ﻟﻠﻘﺒﺾ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ .ﻭﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﺟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻟﻠﻘﺒﺾ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻇﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻗﺪﻣﲔ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻔﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺳﻨﺸﲑ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺪﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ
ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻗﺪﻣﲔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ
ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻟﻠﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻪ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻮﻕ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﻗﹰﺎ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻠﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﺭ ﳏﺮﻭﺳﹰﺎ
ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺎﺗﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺷﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﳏﺮﻭﺳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﺷﺮﻑ ﻷﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﺍﺷﺮﻑ
ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺮﻙ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻞ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ
ﳑﺎ ﳚﻠﻠﻪ.
ﻼ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻓﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻧﺪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻓﻸﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻌﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺇﺫ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲰﻜﻪ ﺃﻛﱪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﺿﺔ ﻟﻠﻀﺮﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﺯﻫﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺗﺴﺘﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺒﺾ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ،ﻓﺎﻗﺘﺼﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺘﺼﺮﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺗﻨﻘﺒﺾ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﲦﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ
ﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻗﺒﻀﺘﺎ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﻗﺒﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﻭﺷﺔ ﻋﻞ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ
ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﻓﻮﻕ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺣﱴ ﲤﺎﺱ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ،
ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻣﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲡﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺮﺵ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻢ ﲜﻠﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﻭﻗﺪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻗﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺛﻠﺜﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﻟﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺣﺴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺖ
ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﹰﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻟﻮ ﻓﺴﺪ ﺣﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺲ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺎﻭﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻔﺴﺪﺓ ﳊﺲ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺤﻤﻞ ﺍﻷﺛﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻌﻄﻠﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﻠﻂ
ﻼ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ.ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺷﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺣﺸﻮ ﺧﻠﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﻌﻄ ﹰ
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲤﻨﻊ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﺍ ﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺣﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﻘﻲ
ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺪﻋﻢ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻳﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺴﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻛﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ .ﻭﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﱃ
ﻓﻮﻕ ﲤﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺮﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ
ﻟﻠﺨﻨﺼﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ،ﻭﻫﻦ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﻦ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻞ ﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﺪﻭﺭ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ
ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﺇﺻﺒﻊ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻹﺻﺒﻊ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ
ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮ ﺱ :ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺧﺮ ﱂ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ .ﻭﻣﺒﺪﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﲦﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺇﺻﺒﻊ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﲝﺚ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺳﺒﻊ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﺴﻊ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﺔ
ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺟﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻓﺔ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻓﻠﻢ ﲣﻠﻖ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻟﻮ ﺣﺸﻲ ﻋﺸﺮﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ
ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﺼﻼﺕ ﻬﺑﺎ .ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﻨﺸﺂﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ،
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺣﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻈﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﲤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻮﺗﺮﻳﻦ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﲤﻴﻞ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﻮﺗﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﱯ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻋﻀ ﻼﺕ ،ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ
ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻛﺎﺑﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺗﺮ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻂ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻈﻨﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ.
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﻮﺗﺮ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺗﺮ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺑﻮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ .ﻭﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ
ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻔﺎﻩ .ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ :ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﲦﺎﻥ ﻟﻈﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺒﻌﺪﺓ
ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﻒ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺳﺒﻊ :ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻟﻘﺒﺾ
ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﻭﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻓﻮﻕ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻠﺔ
ﳍﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺮﺵ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻨﱯ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺗﻘﺒﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻤﻊ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻟﻪ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻤﻊ ﻛﺐ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺸﻂ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﺄﻣﺎﻡ
ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﺄﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻭﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳋﻤﺲ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﺒﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ ،ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ،ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻗﺒﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﺴﻄﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺣﺎﳍﺎ ﺃﻭ
ﻻﹰ ،ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﲦﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻳﺪ ﺗﺴﻊ ﻭﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﳋﺸﺒﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺎ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻤﻜﻨﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﰲ
ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺗﺼﺮﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﳝﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻭﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻔﹰﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺈﺭﺍﺩﺗﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﳍﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ:
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﲤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻱ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺘﻪ ﻓﺎﻧﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﺎﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﹰ
ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ.
ﻼ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻴﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻴ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ.ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﲔ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻴ ﹰ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺎﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﺼﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ
ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺮﺣﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳘﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﳓﺪﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ،ﻫﺬﻩ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﺇﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﺔ ﻳﻠﺘﺼﻖ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻻﲢﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﻜﻢ ﺑﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﺛﻼﺛﹰﺎ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻒ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﺫ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻻ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ
ﻻ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﻒ ﻣﺆﺭﺏ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻖ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﹰ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲤﺪﺩﺕ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻧﺼﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﺞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻏﲑ ﳑﻜﻨﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺇﺫ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﲤﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻓﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﺼﺎﺭ ﺯﻭﺟﲔ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺍﳌﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻷﺟﻨﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻓﻸﻥ
ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﺘﻒ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﺍﳉﻔﺎﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ
ﺑﻌﺼﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ :ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ
ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻧﻌﺼﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻴﻀﻄﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻻﻧﻌﺼﺎﺭ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺇﱃ
ﺣﺪ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺑﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺪﻓﻊ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻳﻘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﺑﻌﺼﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻟﻴﺸﺘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﻓﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺦ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﻀﺖ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻋﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺩﻋﻤﺘﻪ ﺃﻱ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻭﺛﺎﻗﺔ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺩﻭﻥ
ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻷﻥ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﺈﺩﻓﺎﺋﻬﺎ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻄﺒﺦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﺴﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﻉ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻔﺮﻃﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ
ﻓﻸﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﺼﱯ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﻟﻴﻜﻤﻞ ﻫﻀﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻫﻀﻤﻪ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻭﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺃﺧﺮ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﻞ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﱪﺩ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﳏﻴﻂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﻼﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﶈﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺧﺮﻗﻪ ،ﻭﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺭﻛﻦ ﻭﺛﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﰲ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻐﲑ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻬﺰﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻗﺤ ﻼﹰ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﳑﺘﺪﺓ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ
ﻭﻭﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻖ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺃﻭﻓﻖ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺿﻤﻪ ﳌﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﶈﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺩﻓﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺿﻲ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻭﻡ ﻟﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﱄ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﺿﻲ
ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﻔﻆ ﻟﻮ ﺿﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﱄ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺿﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﱄ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺃﻗﻞ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺒﺢ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻭﻥ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﺚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺎﹰ؟
ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺬﺭ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﱂ ﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻳﻔﺘﺢ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺳﺦ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﲏ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺎﹰ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﻛﺎﳉﻤﺎﻉ
ﻭﳓﻮﻩ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﻬﺗﺒﻂ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻓﻴﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻨﻌﻬﺎ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺼﺮﻩ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺎﹰ ﺻﺮﻓﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﹰﺎ ﲝﺎﻝ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ﻟﻺﺣﺒﺎﻝ ،ﻭﱂ
ﳚﻌﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻳﺴﺘﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﺬﺫ ﻓﻴﻀﺮ ﺑﻪ،
ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻠﺬ ﻟﺬﺓ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻔﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ .ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﻓﻠﻮﻻ ﺗﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻷﻣﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺄﻱ ﻗﺪﺭ
ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﻭﰲ ﺃﻱ ﺳﻦ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ .ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺗﻮﻗﻔﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﳏﺮﻙ ﻟﻺﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻳﻘﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻟﻪ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻏﲑ ﳐﺘﺺ ﲞﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﺫ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻬﺗﻴﺆ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻓﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻓﺎﹰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻀﻞ ﳛﺮﻛﻬﺎ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ،
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻮﺳﻊ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ﲜﺬﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻮﻑ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﳒﺬﺏ ﳏﻴﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﺗﺴﻊ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻻ
ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﹰﺎ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻏﲑ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻳﺢ ﻧﺎﻗﺤﺔ
ﺗﺴﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺷﻬﻮ ﺃﻧﻴﺔ ﻳﺼﺤﺒﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ﻟﻴﻐﺬﻭﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺢ ﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ .ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﳛﻤﺮ ﻭﻳﺰﺭﻕ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﲤﺪﺩﺗﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﺧﺎﺻ ﹰﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺪﺓ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﳚﺐ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ .ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ
ﲞﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﻰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻷﻥ ﳎﺮﺍﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ .ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺠﻤﻟﺮﺍﻩ ﻟﺮﻗﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﺛﻘﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻓﻤﺠﺮﺍﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ،ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﺮﻯ
ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ ﺣﺒﺴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻭﱂ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻋﺴﺮ ﳋﺮﻭﺟﻪ؟ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺣﺴﺎﺳﹰﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺄﱂ ﲝﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺩﱏ ﺑﻮﻝ
ﻼ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻼ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﳛﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻷﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺗﻘﻄﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﺩﻱﺀ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻣﻮﺭ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺇﻥ ﺇﺻﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻞ ﻋﺴﺮ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻋﺴﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﺟﻒ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﳌﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻋﻔﻨﻪ ﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺎﺳﻪ ﰲ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺼﺒﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﲨﻠﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺑﻘﺎﺋﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﺠﺘﻤﻊ،
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﻞ ﻼ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻗﺬﺭ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻘﻄﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺪﺓ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺮ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺮﻡ ،ﻭﻋﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ:
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﳉﻠﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺣﱴ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﻠﺪﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺟﻠﺪﹰﺍ ﳊﻤﻴﹰﺎ .ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺮ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ،ﻓﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺑﺮ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻤﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻭﲤﺎﺱ ﰲ
ﻭﺳﻄﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ
ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﻟﻴﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻻﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﲤﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﻟﺌﻼ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺓ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ
ﲢﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻟﻒ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻐﺸﻲ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ .ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻟﺬﺗﻪ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺮﺍﻍ ﺍﳌﲏ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻀﻌﻒ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﻋﻀﻼﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻳﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ
ﻣﻨﺠﺬﺑﹰﺎ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ.
ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺬﺭ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﻘﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺭﺧﻮﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﻘﻲ ﺯﺑﻠﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﺸﺂﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺘﺤﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺄﺧﺬﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﺇﻗﻼﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﱪﺯ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺋﻬﺎ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻋﺴﺮ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻛﻠﻲ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ
ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﺈﺷﺎﻟﺔ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ
ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﲝﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﳌﺒﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺮﺑﺔ ﻟﻪ.
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ
ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮﻯ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺘﲔ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻪ
ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻷﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﰲ ﲝﺚ ﳜﺼﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺑﻜﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﲡﻠﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ،ﻭﺗﻠﺘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻘﻮﺓ
ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﺒﺜﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻨﻦ ،ﻓﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﻨﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﲡﻠﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻭﺟﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ.
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻸﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﳝﺘﺪ ﰲ ﺃﻧﺴﻲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻓﺒﺎﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻔﻴﺔ ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺍﳒﺬﺍﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺑﺎﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺟﺬﺑﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻴﺒﺴﻄﻪ ﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺟﺬﺑﹰﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺭﺍﻓﻌﹰﺎ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻷﻥ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻪ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ
ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻮﹰﺍ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﻓﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻓﻀﻼﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﲔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻳﺸﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﲔ
ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ .ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻣﻊ.
ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﳊﻖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻗﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺗﻮﺯﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻓﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻪ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺴﻄﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻂ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﲡﻠﻞ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ .ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ:
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺭﺃﺳﲔ.
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ :ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﲔ ﻓﻴﺠﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻛﻌﻀﻠﺔ .ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻭﱃ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ.
ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻭﺱ ﺇﺫ ﳍﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﺒﺴﻄﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﺒﻄﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻠﺪ ﺗﺸﺎﻛﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲡﻠﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﺘﻤﻸ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻔﺮ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ.
ﻭﳛﺘﺒﺲ ﻭﳚﻮﺩ ﺳﻄﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺃﻛﱪ ﺭﺃﺳﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﲔ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺧﺺ .ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮﳘﺎ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ
ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍ ﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻼ ﺍﻣﺘﺪ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﺎﺏ ﻟﻴﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ :ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﻭﺯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﺗﺮ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﳊﻤﻲ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ
ﻭﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺑﻄﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﺖ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ
ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﺑﺴﻄﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ.
ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻣﻊ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻓﲔ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ،
ﻼ ﳌﻴﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺒﻄ ﹰ
ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻛﱪ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨ ﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ،ﻭﲤﺘﺪ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ،ﻭﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺎﳉﻠﺪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ،
ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ
ﻭﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ ﻭﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﳑﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﺮﺃﺳﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺧﻠﻔﻴﻪ ﻭﻭﺣﺸﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻓﻤﻤﺎ ﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﻓﻬﻤﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺑﺄﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤﻰ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﲤﻴﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻙ .ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻌﻼﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﻭﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺑﺴﻄﻪ ،ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻳﺴﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﲤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺇﻣﺎﻟﺔ ﺻﺎﳊﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ
ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧﺴﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺍﳒﺬﺑﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﻫﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ،ﻭﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻨﻖ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﻼ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺑﺴﻄﹰﺎ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﲤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ...ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﺾ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺧﻔﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﺗﻮﺟﺪﺍﻥ ﲡﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ،ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺗﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﹰ ،ﻭﳘﺎ
ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ،ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻗﻞ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺗﲔ ﻟﻮ ﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻀﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻬﺑﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ
ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ...ﺇﱃ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ
ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﲤﻴﻴﻞ ﻓﺨﺬﻩ ،ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﺮﺗﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ ﺗﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ،
ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺗﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻲ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻕ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﳌﻔﺼﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺑﺾ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻕ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺿﻴﻘﺔ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻛﱪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺇﺫ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﺨﺬ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻠﺘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ
ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺪﻋﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻔﺔ ﻭﺗﻘﻮﻱ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﻭﲤﻨﻊ ﺯﻭﺍﳍﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻪ ﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﺜﻮ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻂ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﺎ ﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺜﲏ ﺭﺟﻠﻪ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻳﺒﺴﻄﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﺤﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻭ ﺭﺟﻠﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻛﺎﳌﻀﺎﻋﻔﺔ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﱐ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﲏ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺮﺍﻫﺔ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺳﻦ ﻣﲏ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻌﻴﻒ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻴّﻦ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺭﻳﺔ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺿﻔﺔ
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮﺑﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻑ ﳊﻤﻲ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻲ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﲢﺖ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻕ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﺑﺾ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻕ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ...ﺇﱃ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺭﻳﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﲤﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﰒ ﺗﺘﻮﺭﺏ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ،ﻓﺘﻤﺮ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺗﱪﺯ ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻴﺔ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻷﺭﺑﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﺟﻠﻴﻪ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﻣﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺨﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ .ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻋﻘﺒﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻔﺾ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﻟﻴﻄﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﺎﻝ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻗﺪﻣﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻃﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺎﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﳊﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻃﺆ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ
ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻮﻃﺆ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﻜﻢ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ،
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ،ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﺎﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲜﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻼ
ﻼ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻼ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﻘ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺘﺎ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺅﻩ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻓﻀﺔ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺧﻔﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺸﻲ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺮﻓﻊ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ
ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﺖ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﺟﺬﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﻓﻴﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ .ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺨﺬ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ .ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ
ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺘﻪ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ
ﻭﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻟﻮ ﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺃﲰﺎﳒﻮﱐ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺵ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺷﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺮﻳﻀﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺄﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ .ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺛﻠﺚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺛﻠﺜﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﲰﺎ ﳒﻮﻧﻴﺔ ،ﺇﺫ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ
ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎﻥ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺑﻀﺔ ﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻸﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻮﺍﺑﺾ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﰐ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻒ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻋﺸﺮ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ،ﻭﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ،ﻭﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺤﺴﻦ ﺗﺸﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻃﺆ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﻣﺴﺎﻛﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻲ ﺃﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ ،ﻭﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻹﻣﺴﺎﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﻃﺆ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ
ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻷﻥ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣﺴﺎﻙ ﺍﳌﻮﻃﺆ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺟﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻟﺘﻤﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﻨﺠﻬﺎ ﻟﺘﻤﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲤﺘﺪ ﻓﺘﻨﻘﺒﺾ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺛﻼﺙ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﲤﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻣﺒﺪﺅﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻗﻮﻱ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﺒﻊ
ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻨﺼﺮ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﻭﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﺒﻊ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺗﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻳﺄﰐ
ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﰒ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻭﺗﺮ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻻ ﻗﺴﻤﻲ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﻭﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺸﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻀﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ،ﻭﲤﺘﺪ ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺑﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﺁﺧﺬﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ .ﻭﻭﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﲔ ﻟﻠﺠﺲ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻉ ،ﻭﻳﺸﺪﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﺭﺑﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﻱ ﳝﺮ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺎﻕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻨﻔﺮﺩ
ﻼ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﻡ ،ﰒ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ، ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ .ﻭﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﺾ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ. ﻭﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺳﻎ ﻭﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﳑﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺍﰐ
ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺖ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ :ﲬﺲ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﲤﻴﻴﻞ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ،
ﻭﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺳﺒﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺸﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻡ.
ﻓﺎﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺸﻂ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ،ﻭﳌﺜﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﲬﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ،ﻟﻜﻞ ﺃﺻﺒﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﲤﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ
ﻭﺍﺛﻨﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻺﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳋﻨﺼﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻒ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺒﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻎ،
ﻭﻋﺸﺮ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ﻟﻘﺒﺾ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺒﻊ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻷﺻﺒﻊ؛ ﻓﻤﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻨﱯ ﺍﳌﻔﺼﻞ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﲨﻠﺔ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﲬﺲ ﻣﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﻊ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻄﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺃﻭﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﺎ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺴﺘﻘﺼﻲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﻓﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﻣﻮﺟﺰ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ
ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﳑﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ،ﻭﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺭﺑﺎﻁ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻭﳊﻤﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ .ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﻩ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺳﻴﻢ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﻴﺌﺘﻬﺎ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ،
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻛﺄﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﺄﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺣﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺄﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ
ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺣﺠﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﻛﺎﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻛﺄﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﳓﻮ
ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ
ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻛﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺩﺳﻬﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻛﺎﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﻊ
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻛﺎﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ .ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﻛﺎﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻞ ﻛﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﻭﺳﺎﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳔﺎﻋﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﻘﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺻﺪﺭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻗﻄﻨﻴﺔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ
ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺃﻭ
ﹰﻻ .ﻭﺑﺎﻟﱵ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻻ ﻷﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﺎﺗﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻊ ﻭﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻨﺔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ
ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻟﺘﻤﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﲢﻠﻞ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺼﻠﺢ ﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﺗﻐﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ
ﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻳﺒﻮﺳﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺃﺭﺿﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ
ﺍﻻﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻴﺒﻮﺳﺔ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﹰﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ
ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﲟﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﺴﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻋﻬﺎ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺒﺜﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺟﻌﻠﺘﻪ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ﺃﻱ ﺟﻌﻠﺘﻪ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻨﺒﺚ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﺎﺭ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﳊﻤﻲ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺣﺎﺳﹰﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺲ
ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﲣﺘﺺ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﱂ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺰﻭﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻋﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ؟ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﺎ :ﱂ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻲ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ؟.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﺘﻬﺎ :ﱂ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺑﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﺱ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ؟ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺔ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻱ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲟﺮﺻﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻋﻲ ﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﻚ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻓﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ
ﻛﺒﲑ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻫﺎ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻊ ﻟﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ
ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻨﺨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻴﻨﺔ.
ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻻ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺜﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﻞ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺗﺄﺫﻳﺔ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺃﰎ ﻭﺃﻛﻤﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ
ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﹰ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺤﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺄﺫﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺃﻭ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻼﺯﻡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻲ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺧﻠﻒ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﻫﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺄﺗﻰ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺗﺮﻯ
ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﰲ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﳍﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻗﻮﺱ ﻗﺰﺡ ﻭﳓﻮ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍ ﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺮﺍﻛﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ
ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺘﻪ ﻟﻸﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺴﻮﺱ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺄﺗﻰ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﻋﺼﺐ ﰲ
ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﻃﺐ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ.
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺫﻭ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ
ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ .ﻭﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒ ﺢ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﰲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ
ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲝﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ
ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﳎﻮﻓﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ
ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ ﺷﺒﺤﹰﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺗﺄﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺴﻮﺱ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﻩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ.
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺁﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﻹﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺁﻓﺔ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ .ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻵﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻹﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ
ﰲ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ ﺁﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺒﻖ ﻟﻠﺘﻜﺜﲑ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺫﻫﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ
ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺧﺬﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ
ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺸﺌﻬﻤﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﺫﺍﻫﺒﲔ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻮﻧﻪ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﻟﺜﻘﺒﱵ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺗﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﺋﻲ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍ ﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﲟﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻻﳕﺤﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻐﲑ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ.
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺬﺗﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﻧﺎﺷﺌﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﻣﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺑﺎﺻﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ
ﻓﻼ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻌﻄﻠﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﳏﺎﻝ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﲔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﺘﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﲑ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﺘﻪ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ
ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻭﻳﻠﺘﻘﻴﺎﻥ
ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﺜﻘﻮﺑﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺳﻄﺤﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺛﻘﺒﹰﺎ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺤﺪ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﲔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﲔ
ﲟﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻼﻥ.
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻏﻠﻈﻪ ﻗﺼﲑﹰﺍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺑﲔ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻗﺼﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺒﺪﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﲔ .ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﺒﺪﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﳌﺦ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺘﺸﺒﺤﺔ ﺗﺸﺒﺢ
ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺤﻔﻆ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﲝﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ .ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﺁﻓﺔ ﻷﺣﺪ
ﺑﻄﲏ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺻﻠﻴﱯ .ﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ
ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ.
ﻭﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻻ
ﺗﺘﻘﺎﻃﻌﺎﻥ ﺑﻼ ﺗﺘﻼﻗﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺜﻘﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻗﻲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﰒ
ﻳﺘﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﻥ ﻓﺘﺬﻫﺐ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻳﺔ ﳌﺒﺪﺋﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺻﻠﻴﱯ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ .ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﺇﺑﺼﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻏﻤﻀﺖ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ
ﻋﺎﺭﺿﹰﺎ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻗﻞ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﻏﻤﻀﺖ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻟﻸﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻟﺘﻌﻄﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃ؟ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ
ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻟﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ
ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺻﺮﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﻌﻄﻞ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻏﻤﻀﺖ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ
ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺿﺎﻕ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﳑﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻌﻄﻠﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﺎﺩ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﺎﺗﺴﻊ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﻐﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﳝﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﺣﱴ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺛﻘﺒﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ
ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻣﺆﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﺘﺄﺩﻯ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﺍ
ﻼ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺷﻴﺌﲔ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﺰﻭﻝ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻓﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ،
ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﲑ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻭﺗﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﺫ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻛﺒﻌﺪﻱ ﺿﻠﻌﲔ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ،
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻘﻊ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺷﻴﺌﲔ ﺗﺎﻣﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﻖ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻞ ﱂ ﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺗﺎﻣﲔ ﺑﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﳜﻞ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻣﺎ
ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻧﻘﺺ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﻛﻤﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﻻﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﲔ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻓﺘﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺣﺼﻮﳍﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﳐﺘﻠﻄﺘﲔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻄﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﹰﺎ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎ
ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﳑﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﻻﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻤﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﲑﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ
ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﰒ ﻳﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺘﲔ ﻗﺼﲑﹰﺍ
ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﲔ ﻓﻴﻄﻮﻝ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﱂ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻ ﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﳑﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻤﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ
ﺧﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ،ﺇﺫ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺷﺒﺤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﰒ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺷﺒﺤﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻘﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ
ﻼ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﰒ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺭﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﳐﺘ ﹰ
ﻻ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﳛﺲ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻣﺎﻟﺖ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻃﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺷﺒﺤﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ
ﰒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲤﺪﺩ ﻋﺼﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺒﺤﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻓﲑﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ
ﺷﻴﺌﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺗﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﲑﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒ ﺤﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﻭﻻ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻄﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﲤﺪﺩ ﻋﺼﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ .ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺧﻠﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻋﺼﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺘﲔ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻭﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ
ﺣﺪ ﻻﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﻓﻐﲑ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ
ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻻﺯﻣﹰﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺿﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻲ...
ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻋﻴﲏ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻠﻬﺎ ﺭﻃﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺭﻃﺒﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻣﺘﻜﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺭﻃﺐ ﻟﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ
ﻟﻴﻨﻪ.
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﻛﺔ
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﺸﺄ ﰲ ﻃﺮﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﳐﺮﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺒﲔ ﰲ
ﻧﻘﺮﰐ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺼﺒﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﺠﻤﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ
ﻝ ﻣﻨﺸﺌﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻤﺠﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻣﻨﺸﺌﻬﻤﺎ ،،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺼﺒﻬﺎ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮ ﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻠﺐ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺍﳊﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ:
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺃﻣﻴﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳊﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺼﺐ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻮﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﳚﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ
ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺑﲔ ﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻟﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻨﺸﺌﻪ ﻭﳐﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻇﻦ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻇﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﺣﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﺺ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺗﻠﺒﺪ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ
ﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺓ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺑﻞ ﻷﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻠﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻧﻈﲑﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻡ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﻋﺮﺿﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﳝﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻭﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻭﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻄﻨﲔ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﺰ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻓﺠﺰﺁﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ
ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺆﺧﺮ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﺩﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﺔ ﺁﺧﺬﺓ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺼﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻭﻛﺎﻟﻨﺼﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺼﺔ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ .ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ ﺛﻼ ﺛﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ ،ﻭﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ
ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ ﻭﳛﻔﻆ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﻫﻲ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻟﻪ ﺣﱴ
ﳛﻮﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﳍﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻫﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺻﻐﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ
ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺓ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ :ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻟﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻠﺒﺼﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻳﻨﺒﺚ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺎﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻻ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺗﻔﺎﺭﻗﻪ ﻭﺗﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳐﺮﺝ
ﻛﻞ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺜﺎﺛﻬﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺷﻌﺒﻪ ﺗﻄﻠﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ .ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻓﺘﻜﺜﺮ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻭﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺿﻌﻔﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﺘﻌﲔ ﳍﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻧﺒﺜﺎﺙ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﳐﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻀﻌﻔﻪ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ .ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﻼﻧﻀﻐﺎﻁ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻭﻟﻔﺮﻁ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﺩﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺍ ﻟﻌﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻟﲔ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻳﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺩﻗﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ.
ﻗﺪ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ :ﺇﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍﹰ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺇﱃ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻓﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻳﻨﺸﻖ
ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻨﺸﻖ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ .ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻻ ﲣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺮﺝ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻜﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺸﻖ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺒﻄﻦ ﻟﻠﺼﻤﺎﺥ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻻ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻤﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺃ ﻧﻪ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ
ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﺤﺒﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ،ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻣﻌﻪ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻌﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﻳﻐﺸﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺼﻤﺎﺥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﺇﻥ ﻋﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ،
ﺇﺫ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺎﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﻪ .ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻠﻚ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﻞ ﳝﻴﻞ ﳝﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻭﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺘﲔ :ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﺃﻱ ﺣﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ،ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺣﺲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ؟ ﻭﺃﺟﺎﺏ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﺔ ،ﻭﺁﻟﺔ
ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﳐﺒﺄﺓ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻤﺎﺥ ﺑﺘﻤﻮﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻬﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺪﺧﻞ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻱ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﺣﺪﺛﺖ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﺤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﻄﻌﻢ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﲣﺎ ﻟﻂ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺬﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺪﺭﻙ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﺑﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻄﻌﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﳏﺮﺯﺓ
ﻣﻮﻗﺎﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻭﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻋﻦ ﲤﻮﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻛﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ
ﺗﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻤﻮﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻮﺝ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻉ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺼﺒﻪ ﻟﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻩ ﻭﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻟﻄﻌﻢ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻛﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺑﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ؟ ﻭﺃﺟﺎﺏ :ﺑﺄﻥ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻻﺷﺘﺪ ﺿﻌﻔﻬﺎ
ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻏﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﳐﺮﺝ ﻋﺼﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳑﺎ ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺛﻘﻮﺑﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻪ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺑﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ
ﳐﺮﺝ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳏﺘﻤﻞ ﻻﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳜﺮﺝ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻍ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ...ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﻣﻦ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﻖ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺼﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﻗﺼﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﳚﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻓﻼ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ ﳑﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ .ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﺔ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻐﲑﻫﺎ .ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ
ﻣﻜﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ
ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻭﺗﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺃﺩﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺔ.
ﻼ ﺑﺎﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻣﺸﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺄﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻄﺔ ،ﺇﱐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺣﻜﻤﺔ ،ﺑﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺃﲢﻘﻖ ﺻﺤﺘﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻭﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﺧﻠﻒ ﳐﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﰒ
ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ؟ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻀﺪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﺑﻪ ،ﻷﻧﺎ
ﻧﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻟﻴﻨﻬﺎ،
ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ
ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻﻥ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ
ﻭﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﻌﺎﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ .ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻵﰐ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺿﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻻ
ﻼ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺃﺻ ﹰ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﺗﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻳﻀﺔ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻭﺱ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ،
ﻭﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺭﺍﺑﺎﹰ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻃﻮ ﹰﻻ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﳛﺮﻙ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺪﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻭﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ
ﻭﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻔﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺼﺒﻬﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻓﻤﺨﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻓﻤﺨﺮﺟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﻭﺯﺕ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺻﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻜﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺭﺅﻭﺳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺇﻃﺒﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺟﻬﺎﱄ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻃﻮﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ،
ﻭﳛﺮﻙ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺧﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺑﻂ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﻗﻲ
ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ
ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﳔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺘﻖ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﳔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ
ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﳎﻴﺌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺮ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ
ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﺣﱴ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﰒ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻓﻼ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺒﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺃﻭﱃ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻭﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻮ ﺻﻌﺪﺕ ﻟﺼﻌﺪﺕ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺔ.
ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﲑ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺇﺫ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﰒ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﻊ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻓﻤﻨﺸﺆﻩ ﺍﳊﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻭﻣﺴﺎﻟﻜﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳔﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺧﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺝ
ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺯﻭﺝ ﳑﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ،ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﻁ ﰲ ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ .ﻓﻤﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻼﺣﻪ ﰲ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻓﻜﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﻧﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺓ
ﻛﺎﻟﺴﺒﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻤﻜﻨﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻼﺣﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺎﹰ،
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ،ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﺩ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﻝ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﶈﻤﻮﻝ ﻭﺛﻘﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺳﻌﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻝ
ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺿﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﺿﻴﻘﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻔﺮﻁ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺻﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﺜﻞ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻗﺼﲑﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﱵ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺸﺒﻬﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻮﻛﺔ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻌﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﲣﺮﺝ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺑﻪ .ﻭﺍﳊﻖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺣﺲ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺨﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻳﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻓﻴﺤﺮﻙ ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﳛﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻛﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻛﻞ
ﻼ
ﺟﻬﺔ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺄﺫﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﲰﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﺫﻧﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻮ
ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺃﺫﻧﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲰﺎﻉ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺎﺫﻫﻨﺞ ﳛﺼﺮ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﻳﻌﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻭﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮﳘﺎ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻻ ﳚﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ ﻻ ﳚﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﱂ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﺒﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻵﻓﺔ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﲔ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ.
ﻭﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﻻ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﺸﺮﻑ ﻓﻴﺤﺴﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﺤﺠﺎﺏ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺁﺗﻴﹰﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺇﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺘﺄﺭﻳﺐ ﻓﻼ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺟﻪ ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﻬﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺰﺀﹰﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺇﱃ
ﻋﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﺟﺰﺀﹰﺍ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻣﺔ
ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮﻩ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺳﻴﻒ
ﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺪﱄ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ .ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺰﺀﹰﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻠﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﺻﺮﳛﺔ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻄﲏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻼ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﺎﺋﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻻ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﺌﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺎﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺇﻧﻪ
ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ
ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﺬﻭ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺄﻣﺎ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻳﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻃﻮﻉ ﻟﲑﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ.
ﻭﺍﳊﻖ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﺑﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻃﻮﻉ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ .ﻭﺍﷲ
ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻴﺄﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪﻱ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﲔ .ﺇﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻫﻮ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﱐ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍ ﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﲔ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺧﺘﻨﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻓﺎﻧﻄﻔﺄ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻱ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻴﻼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺩﻡ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻴﻌﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ
ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻬﻮﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻴﻔﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪﻱ ﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﻤﺎ ﲜﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻷﻧﻪ
ﻼ ﻬﺑﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻴﺘﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺗﺄﺧﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﻮﺩ ﻓﺘﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺃﻭ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻨﺰﻭﻝ ﻓﺘﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﳐﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﳐﺮﺝ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻲ ﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ...ﺇﱃ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪﻱ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ
ﳐﺮﺝ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺾ ﻛﻼﻣﹰﺎ ﳐﺘﺼﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﲤﺎﻡ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ
ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
؟
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ..ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻲ ﺃﺧﺬ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﺜﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﻛﺘﻒ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﰐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ :ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺒﺎﺗﻴﲔ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﺇﻣﺎ ﰲ
ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻏﲑ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺩﺍﺝ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺩﺍﺝ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻟﺒﻄﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺪﺍﻥ .ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻴﺎ ﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ
ﺍﻹﺑﻂ ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﻫﻼ ﳍﺎ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ؟ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻥ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻟﺼﻐﺮﻩ ﻓﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ
ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﻀﻞ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﺜﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺜﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ،
ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻏﲑ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳘﺎ :ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺒﺎﺗﻴﲔ ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪﺍﻥ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺟﲔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮﻳﻦ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺩﺍﺟﲔ ﺃﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﲔ ﻟﻸﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﺩﺍﺟﲔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ
ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻬﻤﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺟﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺎﺗﻴﲔ ﰲ ﺻﺤﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺟﲔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮﻳﻦ ﻻ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﲔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﻞ ﺗﻨﺘﺴﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﲞﻠﻘﺔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﲔ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻔﹰﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻟﻴﺤﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﻪ ﻷﻥ
ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻣﻀﺎﻓﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻻﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺟﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻣﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻄﻦ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻠﻒ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ
ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻟﻔﻮﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻟﻮ ﺯﻳﺪ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺪﻝ ﲟﺎ ﰲ
ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﻐﲑﺓ ﺗﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺗﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺗﺼﺪﻕ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺳﻨﱪﻫﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﳓﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻨﺘﺴﺞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﰲ
ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻀﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﻀﻮﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻣﻌﺪ ﹰﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻴﻘﺮﺏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻻ
ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺗﱪﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﱪﺩ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩ
ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻔﻞ ﻻ ﻏﲑ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻓﺮﻗﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ،
ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﺎﻓﺔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺗﱪﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ
ﺍﻟﱪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻭﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺑﻄﻲﺀ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻋﺴﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻻ ﲣﺎﻟﻄﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺌﻼ ﲣﺎﻟﻂ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻐﻠﻆ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ
ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﻓﻌﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﲡﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﱪﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﺴﻔﻞ ﳑﻠﻮﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻌﺪ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻔﻞ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﻠﻆ ،ﻭﻳﻘﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﳍﺎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﲢﺖ
ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻡ ،ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﻟﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺼﲑ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻓﺈﳕﺎ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺮﻕ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺧﺮﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻦ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﲡﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺼﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﲔ ،ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﰲ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﳑﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻭﺭﻃﻲ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺴﻤﲔ :ﺃﺻﻐﺮﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ .ﻭﺃﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻹﻓﺎﺩﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻳﺔ.
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻭﺃﺣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻗﺮﺏ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺣﺮﺯ
ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﺣﺮﺯ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ
ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻷﺿﻼﻉ ،ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﶈﺮﺯ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻭﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻏﺎﺋﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﺲ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ ﳑﻜﻦ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎ ﻓﻞ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﻟﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳓﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﳏﺮﻭﺯﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻪ ،ﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ
ﻳﻌﺎﻭﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﳐﺮﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻼﻕ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ
ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﺗﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﻜﺊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ
ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﻟﻴﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﻀﺮ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻏﺪّﺓ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺗﺔ .ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﻃﺌﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ
ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ .ﻭﳌﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺟﺰﺀﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻓﻘﺮﺓ ﳝﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺮﺳﻞ ﺷﻌﺒﹰﺎ ﺃﺧﺮ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳝﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﲔ :ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳜﺘﺺ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ،ﻭﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﳜﺘﺺ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﱪﺩ ،ﻓﺘﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺼﲑﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻟﺘﺠﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺘﺬﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ
ﻏﲑ ﻧﻘﻲ ،ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﲔ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻷﻬﻧﻤﺎ
ﳚﺘﺬﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﺘﻨﻘﻰ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺟﺘﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﺬ ﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ،ﺑﻞ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﻏﺎﺋﻲ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻠﻲ :ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ .ﻭﺩﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﻲ :ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻴﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ،
ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﺨﺮ ،ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻣﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺨﲑ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻬﺗﻴﺌﻬﺎ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺅﻩ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﻟﻸﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ،
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﲡﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻧﺔ،
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ
ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻟﺘﺠﺘﺬﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺎﻵﰐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺼﺤﺐ ﺩﺍ ﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﺮﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ،ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ
ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﺃﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﳌﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ
ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ
ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ
ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺸﺎﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ
ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ
ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻛﻨﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻛﻨﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻛﻴﻤﻮﺳﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻼ ﻟﻼﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻟﻪ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺪﻧﹰﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺑ ﹰ
ﺣﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳎﻮﻓﹰﺎ
ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ :ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﻱ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳒﺬﺍﺑﻪ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮ ﺱ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺷﺎﺣﻪ ﻟﻴﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻟﻠﻜﺒﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻋﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺗﻔﺮﻉ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺸﺘﺘﺎﹰ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﻓﺮﻭﻋﻪ ﺍ ﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻧﻮﺍﺣﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺎﻥ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺬﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺑﺎﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﺑﺘﺠﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﻭﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﻮﻑ.
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻴﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺎﺭ
ﻛﻴﻤﻮﺳﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺟﻬﺔ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳉﻬﺔ
ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﳍﺬ ﺍ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﺘﻤﺘﺺ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻮﺱ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺗﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ.
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ :ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ.
ﻭﻟﻨﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻟﻨﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﲬﺲ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﲬﺴﺔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺛﻬﺎ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ،ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺎﺓ ﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻟﺒﻌﺪﻩ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ :ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺒﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﰒ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﲣﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺏ
ﻻﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ
ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺮﺳﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺠﺮﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﺘﺠﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﻌﺒﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻌﺮ.
ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﳏﺪﻬﺑﺎ .ﻭﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺘﺎ ﻣﺘﻐﺎﻳﺮﺗﲔ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﲤﺘﺼﻪ
ﻼ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺘﺼﺎﺻﻪ ﻓﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﳏﺘﺒﺴﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ؟
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﺘﻤﻮﻩ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲤﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﻻ
ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ
ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﺮﻗﻘﻪ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﰲ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﲡﺘﺬﺑﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﲡﺘﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﳚﺘﺬﺏ ﺣﻴﻨﺌ ٍﺬ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ
ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺻﺎﳊﺎﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺃﻱ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺼﻠﺤﺎﻥ
ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﻣﻘﻌﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻀﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﻭﳝﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳘﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻄﺮ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻄﲔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ،ﻷﻥ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻄﲔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺋﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻛﱪ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﻏﻠﻈﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻷﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﻋﻪ ﺑﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﻟﻄﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻔﹰﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﺘﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻮﻧﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﻌﺮﻫﺎ،
ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻧﻘﻴﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻄﲔ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﳍﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﻕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺧﺮﻕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻟﻠﺤﺠﺎﺏ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﲔ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻧﻮﺍﺣﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺮﻗﻪ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺧﺮﻗﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﱪﻣﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ.
ﻭﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺢ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺧﺮﻗﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺗﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ
ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻗﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ،ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺏ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻏﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﲑﺳﻞ ﺇ ﻟﻴﻪ ﺷﻌﺒﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺗﺘﻔﺮﻉ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻌﺮ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻏﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ
ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﳚﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻑ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻟﻴﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺟﻔﺎﻑ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﻳﺒﻮﺳﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻑ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﺣﱴ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳓﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ:
ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ
ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺗﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ؟ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ؟
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ .ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﺗﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﲣﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻭﻋﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻪ ﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻕ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﳑﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻱ
ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻭ
ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ.
ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮﻃﺎﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﺎ ﲡﻮﻳﺰ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻫﺒﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ،ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﳍﺎ ﺃﺳﻮﺓ ﺑﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﰲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺳﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﱪﺻﻲ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻋﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﳝﻨﺔ
ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﺒﺎﺟﺎﻧﺲ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻋﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪﺍﻥ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺸﺮﺡ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻌﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺇﻻ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺘﲔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﺳﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻭﻋﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ
ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻳﺘﻴﺎﻣﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻴﺎﺳﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﳝﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻭﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﰲ ﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﻹﺑﻄﻲ ،ﰒ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲟﺎ ﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﻟﻮﻧﻴﻮﺱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ :ﺯﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ.
ﻭﺯﻭﺝ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ :ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ،ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻨﱯ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻛﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﳌﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻓﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺎﻉ
ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺗﲔ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﻓﻴﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﺫﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻨﺒﱵ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺩﺍﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﳋﻮﺍﺻﺮ ،ﰒ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺄﺑﺾ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ،ﰒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﳌﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻓﺼﺪ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ :ﻓﻴﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺪﺍﻍ ﻭﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻛﺘﺎﻑ ﰒ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻭﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ
ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺍ ﺑﻊ :ﻓﻴﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﰒ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳑﺘﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺄﺑﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﺪﻳﻦ ﰒ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﻔﲔ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﰒ ﳝﺘﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺬﺭﺍﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺄﺑﺾ ﻭﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﺪ ﰒ ﳝﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻴﺄﰐ
ﻋﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﰒ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﰒ
ﻳﻨﻘﻀﻲ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ .ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﻣﻨﺸﺆﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺗﺆﺩﻱ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍ ﻟﺒﺪﻥ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﺄﺩﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ،ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ،ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ.
ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﻓﺼﺪﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺷﻨﻊ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﻭﺃﻓﺮﻁ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻏﺮﺽ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻔﺼﺪ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻨﺒﺚ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺘﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ....ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻳﻨﺤﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﻳﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻣﻊ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻋﺮﻕ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻧﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﻡ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ
ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﳜﻠﻒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ.
ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ
ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ
ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻹﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻋﺮ ﻕ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻧﺎﺑﺘﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﺃﻥ ﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﳝﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻳﺼﲑ
ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ،ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺩﺧﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﳝﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺫﺍ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ .ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺫﺍ ﻃﺒﻘﺘﲔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺼﻔﹰﺎ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺒﺜﻮﺛﺎﹰ ﰲ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ
ﻓﻴﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﺕ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻓﺘﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺮﺷﻴﺢ ﻟﻄﻴﻔﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ.
ﻼ ﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﺸﺎﻛ ﹰ
ﺑﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﻭﻱ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺫﻱ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻨﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄ ﻧﻪ ﻬﺗﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ
ﻳﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻲ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮﺍ ًﺀ ﺻﺮﻓﹰﺎ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ
ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺻﺎﳊﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻄﺘﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺩﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺘﺰﺟﹰﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻠﻄﺎﻓﺔ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻟﻄﻔﺖ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﺘﺴﺨﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺧﻠﻄﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻫﺎ ﻻﺳﺘﻐﻨﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﻋﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻻ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻫﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍ ﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺳﻬﻮﻩ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻐﺬﻭ ﺍﻷﺑﺎﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻃﻌﻤﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍ ﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺻﻐﺮﳘﺎ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺫﱐ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺸﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻔﺔ ﻟﻠﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻑ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺗﻮﺗﺔ ﺷﻌﺐ
ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺼﺖ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻗﺮﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ .ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﺘﻤﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻭﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻑ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ
ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻑ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺷﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﺭﺏ ﰲ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻈﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﺻﻐﲑﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ
ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺗﺼﻌﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺘﲔ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺗﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻧﻴﺔ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻗﺎﺭﺑﺘﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻤﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑ
ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ
ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺫﻱ ﳍﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻭﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻟﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺘﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺒﺦ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺣﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺩﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺩﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﺮﺗﲔ ﻣﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﻣﺮﺓ ﰲ
ﻧﺰﻭﻟﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﻏﺬﺍﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻭﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻟﺒﻨﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﺗﲔ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﺗﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮﳘﺎ ﳝﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻋﻈﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺯﻭﺝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺗﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﲬﺴﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺒﺘﲔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺸﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻧﺸﻌﺐ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻌﻦ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮ.
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ .ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲰﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺩﺍﺝ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﻭﺩﺍﺝ ﻏﺎﺋﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﰒ ﻳﺘﺴﺎﻓﻞ
ﻼ ﰒ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰒ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻠﺤﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ.
ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﺑﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ
ﺑﻈﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻌﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻗﺴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﺮ ﺑﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺑﲔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺭ ﺑﺒﺎﻃﻨﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ
ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭ ﻕ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﰎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺼﺎﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺟﺰﺀﺍﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ .ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﻼ ﰒ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻈﻬﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺘﺮﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺴﻔﻞ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻩ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺃﺧﺮ.
ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳘﺎ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﻥ ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ﺟﺰﺀﺍﹰ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﳓﻮ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺃﻱ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺴﻔﻞ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ
ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻩ ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻗﻮﺗﲔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ
ﻳﺘﻮﺭﺑﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻈﻬﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻠﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﺆﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰒ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﲔ.
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ :ﰒ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺳﻊ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﲔ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ :ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺗﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﲣﻠﻲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﲔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ :ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺘﻤﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﻌﲔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺄﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻉ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻳﺘﺸﻌﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺸﻌﺐ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﺗﺼﲑ
ﺇﱃ ﻟﻔﺎﺋﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ.
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﲢﺘﺎﺟﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﳘﺎ ﺷﺤﻢ ﻛﺜﲑ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ .ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ.
ﻼ ﺗﺼﻔﻰ ﺩﻣﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻔﺬ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﺻ ﹰ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ .ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻋﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﺘﻤﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺮﻗﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ
ﳜﺸﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺟﻬﺘﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺰﻭﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﰒ ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺷﻌﺮﻳﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺘﻮﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻟﺘﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﲡﺘﺬﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﺬﺍﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺳﺆﺍﻻﻥ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻔﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ؟ ﻭﻫﻼ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ؟ ﺃ
ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻔﻲ ﺍﳌﺎ ﺋﻴﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ؟ ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﻴﻒ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺘﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ .ﻭﻏﺬﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻲ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺎﹰ
ﺑﺎﳌﻐﺘﺬﻱ؟
ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻦ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻷﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﲡﺬ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻏﲑ ﳑﻜﻦ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﳏﺎﻝ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻝ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻳﻌﲔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳏﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺫﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﲡﺘﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻓﻴﺨﻠﺺ
ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﳍﺎ ﻻ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺘﺠﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺗﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﳝﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﳉﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺩﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﺩﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎ ﺋﻴﺔ ﳜﻠﺺ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ،
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺁﺗﻴﹰﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ .ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ .ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﺼﻲ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻀﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﲪﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﻭﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻌﺎﻃﻒ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻪ ﻭﻋﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺍﳋﻤﲑﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳜﺮﺝ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﺤﺎ ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﺠﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺨﺎﻉ
ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﻓﻴﻨﻔﺬ
ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﲢﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻞ ﻭﻷﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ،ﻭﺗﻜﻤﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ :ﺇﺫ ﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﻭﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﲤﻴﺰ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﰒ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﰲ ﳎﺎﺭ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ
ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺻﺎﻬﺑﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﺎﻉ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ:
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻌﺪﻯ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ .ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺇﻥ
ﺃﺻﺎﻬﺑﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﺎﻉ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ،ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ
ﻟﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﺎﻉ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺩﻣﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﻗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﺽ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳌﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻨﻴﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﻤﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺣﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ
ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻟﻌﲔ ﻭﺻﻨﻌﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﻛﺄ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻫﺎ
ﻭﻧﺰﻭﳍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺤﻘﻬﺎ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﻭﺍﺭﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ
ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﳏﻔﻮﻇﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﻗﺴﻤﲔ .ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ،
ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻ ﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻗﺴﻢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﺎﺑﻌﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻧﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﲔ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲰﺎﻫﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ،ﻭﲰﺎﻫﺎ ﻏﲑﻩ
ﻃﻮﺍﺋﻒ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﲰﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻋﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺘﻔﺮﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺻﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﺗﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ .ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ
ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﳚﺪ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ
ﻼ ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﺆﺫﻳﻪ ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ. ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﰎ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﲝﻤﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ.
ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻼ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﺸﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﺼ ﹰ
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﻭﻻ
ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ .ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﺲ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﺓ
ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻩ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺩﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﲣﻠﻂ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﲞﺮﺓ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﲣﺘﻠﻂ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﲞﺮﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺭﺃﺱ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﲞﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺣﻪ.
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻋﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺻﺢ ﺫﻫﻨﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻣﺘﺼﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺰﻻﺕ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺣﺔ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﺯﺩﻳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳝﺸﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻛﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻪ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﳔﺎﻋﻪ
ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﻳﺰﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﳌﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲝﺬﺍﺋﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ
ﻼ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺁﺓ. ﺑﺎﶈﺎﺫﺍﺓ .ﺃﻱ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﺋﻲ ﺃﻭ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﺻﻘﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ .ﻭﺳﺒﺐ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﺮﺓ ،ﻓﺎﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻳﻨﺴﺘﺮ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﲝﺪﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺏ ﺡ ﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺝ ﻕ ﻻ ﻳﺮﺍﻫﺎ
ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻧﺴﺘﺎﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﲝﺪﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻭﳓﻦ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﳓﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﳓﻦ
ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﲔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ.
ﻭﻟﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻴﺒﻮﺳﺔ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﰲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻭﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻱ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻄﻠﻴﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﻜﺮ ﻻﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺮﺱ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﳛﺮﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺘﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﲢﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﳌﺎ
ﳛﻮﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺤﻲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﲡﻠﺐ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﺗﻠﺘﺬ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ
ﻓﻴﺪﻋﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻭﻕ ﲢﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺘﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﺘﺄﱂ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﲡﻠﺐ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻠﺘﺬ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﺑﻄﻌﻮﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺤﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﲢﺮﺱ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﺄﱂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﲡﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻊ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻌﺔ ،ﺑﺄﻥ
ﺗﻠﺘﺬ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻓﺘﺤﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻼ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻀﺮ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﺄﱂ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺑﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺃﻭ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﲡﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻊ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﻔﻊ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺬﺍﺫ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻭﺗﺮﻏﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﰲ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﻬﺗﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻜﺜﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ
ﲟﺤﺴﻮﺳﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻗﺪ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﳑﻜﻦ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻳﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺼﻘﻴﻞ ﳛﺎﺫﻳﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﺕ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺿﺎﺭﺓ
ﺃﻭ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺔ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻐﲑ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻐﲑ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻠﻴﺒﻮﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﺎ ﳚﺮﻱ ﳎﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻠﺘﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﺋﻄﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺗﻐﺸﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺦ
ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺐ ﻭﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﳊﻢ ﻭﺟﻠﺪ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ
ﻭﻃﻮﻝ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﱪ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﻞ
ﺷﻌﺮ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻒ ﻓﻴﻌﺴﺮ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺴﺨﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﳛﻨﺎ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮﻃﺎﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﳛﻪ ﺭﺃﺳﹰﺎ ﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﺻﻞ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ.
ﻓﻠﻨﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺗﺴﻌﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻓﹰﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺡ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺃﺿﺪﺍﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻡ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﻌﻈﻴﻢ :ﻭﺣﻖ ﺭﺃﺳﻚ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻭﺣﻖ
ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻚ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ .ﻓﺘﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ .ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺦ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺣﺠﺎﰊ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﳌﺦ ،ﱂ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺠﺐ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻻ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺹ .ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﺼﺪﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﺤﺠﺎﺏ ﺩﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺑﻞ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﺎﳊﺠﺐ ،ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﳌﺦ ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ.
ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﺍﳌﺦ.
ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺃﻬﻧﻢ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺦ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﻢ ﻳﺰﻋﻤﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ
ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﺦ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﳑﻠﻮﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ
ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻙ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ .ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﺘﺨﻴﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻭﺫﺍﻛﺮﺓ :ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﻥ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﱄ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺗﻀﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﺇﻬﻧﻢ ﺷﺮﺣﻮﺍ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺰﻡ. ﻭﺃﺑﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻭﻩ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﻗﻊ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻇﻨﹰﺎ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﻓﻜﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﺃﻬﻧﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﻓﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻋﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺗﻜﺮﺭ ﳍﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻨﺼﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺣﺠﺒﻪ ﻭﳐﻪ ،ﻭﰲ ﺑﻄﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﻨﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺀ ﺫﺍﻫﺐ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺼﻴﻒ ﻭﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺭﻛﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻫﻦ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ.
ﻭ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺼﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ،
ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ ﻟﲑﺗﺒﻂ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﳏﻜﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺦ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻠﻘﺔ
ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ.
ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺗﻨﺼﻴﻒ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺼﻴﻒ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺣﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻨﺼﻒ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺁﻓﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺐ ﻭﺍﳌﺦ ﻻ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ
ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻵﻓﺔ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﺔ ﻟﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺼﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺦ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﱪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺼﻴﻒ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻼ ﻳﺸﻐﻠﻪ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﺩﻯ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ،ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﺒﺨﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺣﱴ
ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺜﺒﻮﺕ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﺤﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﳌﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻋﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﹰﺍ ﻳﺎﺑﺴﹰﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﻭﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳚﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﻳﻌﲔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﻳﻨﺎﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﺄﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻹﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﹰﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺻﺎﳊﹰﺎ ﻟﺼﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﹰﺍ ﺭﻃﺒﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻣﻀﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺣﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ
ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺍﳌﱪﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺃﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﻨﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﺤﺴﻦ ﺗﺸﻜﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﺘﺨﻴﻼﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﶈﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻻ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻃﺒﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺳﻮﻣﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻋﻠﻜﹰﺎ.
ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻣﻊ
ﻟﺪﻭﻧﺘﻪ ﻟﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﳑﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﻮﺑﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﱴ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻮ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻻ ﲢﺲ ﻗﺪﺭﻩ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﻔﻜﺮ ،ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﱴ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺘﻴﺶ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﺰﻭﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﰲ
ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻟﻴﻘﻊ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻭﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻗﺔ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﺑﺮﻭﺩﺗﻪ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱪﺩ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﺓ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻟﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻲ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ
ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺮﻃﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﻥ
ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍ ﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺨﻒ ﺑﺘﺨﻠﺨﻠﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺒﺔ ﺃﺛﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻗﺪ
ﺗﻔﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻗﺪﺓ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻳﺔ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﻠﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ
ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺎﻓﺔ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺳﺨﺎﻓﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﺃﺳﺨﻒ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻟﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ .ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ
ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻏﺎﺋﺒﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺔ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻮﳍﺎ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻭﻏﻨﻤﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﺩﻋﺎﻣﺔ
ﳍﺎ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺑﺄﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ
ﺑﺄﺣﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ،ﳜﺺ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻏﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﳜﺺ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳜﺺ
ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻤﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳝﻴﻨﺎﹰ،
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﳘﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻶﺧﺮ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺣﱴ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺁﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﺎﻭﻳﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺇﺫ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ،
ﻷﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﻭﲰﻜﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺩﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳜﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﳚﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻷﻏﺮﺍﺽ
ﻼ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﻮﺍﺱ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ .ﻓﺎﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏ ﹰ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺜﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ
ﻼ ﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﺜﻞ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏ ﹰ
ﻫﻲ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﳍﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻀﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻐﺮ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﳏﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻪ
ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺎﻝ ،ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻫﻠﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ
ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺸﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺻﻐﲑ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺆﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺆﺩﻱ ﻻ
ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﺧﺬ ﻋﻦ ﳝﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﻳﺴﺎﺭﻩ ﳚﺐ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ،
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻦ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺳﻘﻒ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳓﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻐﺸﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ،ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻏﻮﺹ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻐﺸﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﻏﻮﺻﻪ ﲟﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﺹ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﺔ.
ﻼ ﺃﻱ ﻟﻴﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﺝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺼ ﹰ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﻼ.
ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﺝ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﺼ ﹰ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻣﱪﺃ ﻋﻦ ﳑﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻏﻨﻤﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺑﻀﺮﺑﻪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳉﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﺜﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﳌﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺆﺫﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻭﺟﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻮ ﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻮﺹ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺇﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﲔ ﻟﲔ ﻭﺻﻠﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺼﻠﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻟﻪ ﻛﻤﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﺼﻠﺐ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ
ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻲ؟.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻠﻎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻱ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﻠﻎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻄﻪ.ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻀ ﹰﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳊﻔﻆ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻞ ﻟﻠﻘﺤﻒ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﻳﻐﻮﺹ ﺇﱃ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻮﺍﺯﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﻒ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﺓ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﳊﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻻ
ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﻮﺹ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻟﻠﺪﺭﺯ
ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﹰﺎ ﻷﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﲢﺖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﱂ ﻳﻠﺤﻘﻬﺎ
ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﻛﺔ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻔﻞ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺘﺴﻔﻞ ﻓﻴﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺴﻔﻠﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﻭﻫﺪﺓ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺪﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ ﻣﺘﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﺴﻔﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﱪﻛﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ :ﻃﺸﺘﻴﺔ .ﻭﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﱪﻛﺔ ﺗﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﱪﻛﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻨﻌﺼﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ
ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ
ﻼ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﺴﲑ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﳓﺮﺍﻑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ
ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻴﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﺑﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻡ ﻭﲟﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻓﻴﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﻞ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ
ﻼ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺑﺮﺩﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﻳﺮﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺒﺖ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺒﺘﺎﹰ ﻟﺮﺑﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﺼﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﺼﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﺭﺯ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺎﺫﻳﻪ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺢ.
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺩﺭﺯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻣﻦ
ﳝﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﺇﱃ ﻳﺴﺎﺭﻩ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺎﺫﻳﹰﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺘﺒﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺢ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻷﻥ
ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪ ﺑﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻴﻖ
ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺯ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ ﻟﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻓ ﻼ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻏﲑ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻻ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺘﻢ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﺔ
ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﳊﻠﻤﻴﺘﲔ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ،ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺘﺎﻥ ﲝﻠﻤﱵ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻭﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ
ﻼ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﺘﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺘﻪ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﳍﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺪﺍﻭﺓ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﻤﺎ ﺟﻔﺎﻑ ﻳﺼﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻼ ﰲ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﳝﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻳﺴﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﺭﻃﺐ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻷﻥ ﳏﺴﻮﺳﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲡﺬﺏ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻨﺸﻖ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺿﻌﻔﺖ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻭﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻮﺭﻡ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﺋﻞ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ .ﻭﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻟﻠﺠﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺆﳌﺔ ﻣﻀﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﺣﺎﺋﻞ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ
ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺷﺪﺓ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﲔ ﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺻﻼﺑﺔ
ﻼ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺇﱃﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺘﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍ ﻟﻘﺤﻒ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ،
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺟﺮﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻄﺤﺎﻩ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺎﺑﻼﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﹰﺎ
ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﲰﻚ ﻛﺜﲑ .ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳝ ﻸ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺟﺮﻣﲔ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﲔ ﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻬﺑﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺇﻳﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺰﻕ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ
ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻳﻘﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺿﺎﺭﺑﺔ ،ﻭﻏﲑ ﺿﺎﺭﺑﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﻼﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ،ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﲣﺘﻞ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﳊﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻘﺮﺏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺿﺎﺭﻬﺑﺎ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺿﺎﺭﻬﺑﺎ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ
ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻲ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲰﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺣﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﻷﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻞ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻲ ﻟﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻏﺬﺍﻩ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﲣﺪﻣﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﺃﺣﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻛﺎﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻴﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻌﹰﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﻕ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﻲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻄﻮﻧﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﺼﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﲎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺸﻴﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺸﻴﺔ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﻺﻧﻌﻮﺍﺝ
ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻗﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ
ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻪ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﻭﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻠﻤﺆﺧﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺈﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﹰﺎ
ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲤﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻮ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﰒ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﻤﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﻤﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻠﻮﻩ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﻠﻮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻮﺯﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ :ﺑﻄﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ
ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺑﻄﻦ ﺗﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺑﻄﻦ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﻭﻫﻼ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﹰﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻮﺯﻉ ﻣﺎ ﰲ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ ،ﻭﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻟﻜﱪﻩ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻩ .ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ.
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻄﺦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ
ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﻜﻤﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ
ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﺴﺎﺱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻟﻴﺤﺲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺩﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺿﻌﺎﻑ ﻟﻠﺬﻛﺮ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ
ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺩ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﳍﺮﻣﲔ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﻢ ﺍﳋﺮﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻖ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ
ﻼ ﰒ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍ ﹰﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍ ﹰﻻ ﰒ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ .ﻭﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺗﺼﺪﻕ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺗﻜﺬﺏ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﻄﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻓﻴﻐﺸﻲ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻕ.
ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﹰﺎ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﳎﻤﻊ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﻟﻠﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳝﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺴﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﻓﺠﻮﺓ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻕ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﺺ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺴﻤﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻏﻮﺻﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻐﻮﺹ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻃﺎﻗﺎﻥ :ﻃﺎﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻭﻃﺎﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺎﻕ ﺳﻘﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻭﻳﻐﺸﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺗﻐﺸﻴﺔ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺸﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻊ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻴﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﲔ
ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻨﺴﺞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺴﺞ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺰﺃﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﳑﻠﻮﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺭﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻷﱂ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻩ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺧﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﺟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻟﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻌﲑ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﻭﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﱪﻛﺔ ،ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﺼﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺻﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﻬﺗﺎ .ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﺘﺺ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻋﺴﲑ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﻳﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﱪﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺎﺭ
ﺿﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ ﻗﺼﲑ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻀﻌﻒ ﳉﺮﻣﻬﺎ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﺎﺻﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻼﻗﻲ
ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﻌﺪﺕ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺮﻗﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳝﻨﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺴﺮﺓ ،ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ،ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻋﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺗﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﰒ ﻳﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻹﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﺐ ﺍﳌﺎﺻﺔ
ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﻫﻲ ﳍﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﻛﺎﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻣﻠﺊ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﲜﺴﻢ ﻏﺪﺩﻱ
ﻼ ﳌﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﲜﻮﻫﺮ ﻟﻴﺤﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ .ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻏﺪﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺪﺩﻳﺔ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺟﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﳎﺘﻤﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﲔ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺪﺩﻱ ﺻﻨﻮﺑﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ .ﻭﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﻪ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﻤﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﺷﺒﻪ ﺑﺈﺟﺎﺑﺔ
ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻠﺘﻘﻰ ﺑﻄﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﲔ ﻭﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳛﻜﻢ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﺋﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻌﺔ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺪﻭ ﻣﻔﺴﺪ ﳍﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻒ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﺪﻳﻖ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻨﻔﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺬﺋﺐ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺆﺧﺮﻩ ،ﻓﻴﺸﻮﺵ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﻦ .ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻂ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﻴﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻤﱪﲰﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ
ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﱐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ.
ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺷﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ
ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﺭﻛﲔ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﲔ ﻟﻺﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﳍﺎ ﰒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺑﺎﻧﻔﺮﺍﺝ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻟﻴﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﲜﺮﻡ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ
ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﺴﺪ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺪﻩ ﻳﻀﻐﻂ
ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻼﻗﻰ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﺔ ﺑﺘﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀﻐﻂ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻟﻴﺴﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻓﺘﺤﻪ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ
ﺩﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﻬﹰﺎ ﲜﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﺗﺆﳌﻪ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻷﻣﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ
ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻴﺒﻄﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺘﺤﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﲑﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺔ
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺘﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﳑﺘﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺳﺪﺓ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﺎﹰ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻨﺴﺪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﲑ
ﳑﻜﻦ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﲔ ﲡﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲡﻤﻌﻪ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺪ ﻭﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ
ﻟﻪ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺩﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﻭﺗﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﹰﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺗﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺑﺖ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ،
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﻃﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻭﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪﳘﺎ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ
ﳑﺘﺪﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻛﺎﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﻭﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﹰﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻂ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻱ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻣﺘﺪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻋﻦ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﺴﻤﲔ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﺔ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻓﺴﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﻭﺗﻘﺎﺭﺑﺖ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻮﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﳍﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﻌﺎﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﹰﺍ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻟﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺑﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻬﻤﺎ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺑﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ :ﺇﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﻓﺮﺟﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ
ﲢﺮﻛﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻓﺒﻘﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﲔ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﳏﺎﻻﹰ ،ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ
ﻣﻠﺘﺼﻘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﳌﻐﺸﻲ ﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺑﺎ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺎﻧﺴﺪ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻻ ﲜﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﺕ ،ﻫﺬﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﺕ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺄﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ.
ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻭﺭﺑﺎﻁ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻻﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺮﺑﻂ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﹰ
ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﺕ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﰲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﺤﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﹰﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﲤﺪﺩ ﻭﺿﺎﻕ ﻋﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﺿﻐﻄﺖ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻓﻴﺴﻨﺪ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻘﻠﺼﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩﺕ
ﻋﺮﺿﹰﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻓﺎﻧﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺗﻀﻴﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ
ﺗﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺗﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﻀﻄﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ،
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﻦ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﰲ
ﺣﺎﻟﱵ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﺺ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﺺ ﻭﺗﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ ،ﻭﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﳌﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﻤﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﻘﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﲟﺎ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﲤﺪﺩﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺮﺍﺝ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﲟﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﻌﻮﺩﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻭﲜﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻐﺸﻲ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﻌﻮﺩ
ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﻜﻤﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺮﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻊ
ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﺮﳛﻨﺎ ﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺤﻒ ﻭﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﳌﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﲢﻠﻞ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ
ﻣﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﳉﺮﺏ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﻇﻬﺮﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﺠﺰﻩ ،ﻭﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﺼﻌﺼﻪ .ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﺮﺑﻪ
ﺍﳉﺮﺏ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻮﺭﻗﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻪ،
ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻌﺺ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ
ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﺼﻌﺼﻪ ﻏﻠﻆ .ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻭ ﺳﻄﻬﺎ ﺟﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺑﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﻭﺡ ﲢﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ﻓﻤﺒﺪﺅﳘﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ
ﻼ ﻻ ﺇﺑﺼﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﺎ ﲣﻴ ﹰ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻠﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺐ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻏﻲ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ
ﺑﺎﻷﺯﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ،ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻟﻠﺤﺲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻴﱯ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺘﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ.
ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺻﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺫﻭ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺣﺎﻣﻠﻬﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺔ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﺡ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﳛﺪﺙ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺩ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﰲ ﻋﲔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﺒﺜﺎﹰ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻋﲔ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺑﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺮﻯ
ﺑﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ .ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺳﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﺒﺜﺎﹰ .ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ
ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻳﺘﺨﻴﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ .ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﻣﺘﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻠﺪ ،ﻭﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ،ﺑﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻻ ﲤﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻮﺝ ﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻛﺪ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻟﺘﻤﻮﺝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻮﺝ ﻫﻮ
ﺑﺎﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﺳﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﺣﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻠﻤﻮﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﳋﺸﻨﺔ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺑﺴﻄﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﻐﺸﻰ ﺑﻐﺸﺎﺋﲔ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻡ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻐﺸﻴﲔ
ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﻂ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺮﺵ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﰒ ﺍﻧﻀﻢ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍﺗﺴﻊ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻣﺘﻸ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﻂ ﻭﺍﺗﺴﻊ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﹰﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ.
ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻣﺘﻸ ﻭﻏﻠﻆ ﻭﲰﻦ .ﻭﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺒﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ
ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ،
ﻓﻠﻢ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﻣﻠﺘﺼﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻣﺴﺮﺑﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ .ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﺑﻞ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﻘﺮﺓ
ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻭﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ
ﻣﺎﻟﺌﺔ ﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ
ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻳﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻟﺴﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻘﻊ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ .ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻫﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﻔﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ،ﻭﺃﻥ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺟﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ .ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻨﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﻭﻻ ﳛﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻄﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺛﻼﺙ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﻮﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﺡ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺴﻢ ﳝﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﻠﻞ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻔﲎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺗﻌﺠﺰ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻪ
ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻔﺎﺋﻪ
ﻭﺑﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﲪﺮﺗﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﺋﺐ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﻴﻐﺬﻭﻫﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺑﻌﺪﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩﺕ ﺑﺈﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺻﻔﺎ ًﺀ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﺿﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ .ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ .ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻧﺎ ﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﻻ ﳛﻮﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻣﻠﻮﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺁﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻏﻄﻴﺖ ﲜﺴﻢ
ﻣﻠﻮﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻐﻄﺎﺓ ،ﻭﳏﺠﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﲜﺴﻢ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ،ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺒﺢ
ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻴﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﳌﻐﻄﻰ ﻟﻠﺠﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﺳﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻮﻻﻩ ﻟﺸﻮﻫﺪﺕ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ
ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻮ ﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴﺎﺽ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﺳﻮﺩ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺄﺩﻯ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﺆﺩﻱ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻴﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﱂ ﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻗﻊ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﺒﺢ ﰒ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻟﻮ ﻋﺮﺽ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺗﻐﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﻐﲑ .ﻓﻜﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻳﺘﺨﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺋﻲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﻭﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺒﻮﺳﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ.
ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻧﲑﺓ ﺻﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻋﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ،ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻠﻪ ﻟﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻣﺮ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮﻩ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻓﺮﻃﺤﺖ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺒﺢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﺓ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﺟﺴﻢ
ﻣﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻬﺎ
ﻣﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ .ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﻄﺤﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺋﺮﺓ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺴﻤﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ
ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ .ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﺘﻐﲑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺘﺴﻄﺢ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻄﻴﺢ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻛﺮﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻘﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺁﺓ ﺍﶈﺪﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﲑﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻘﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺁﺓ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮﺓ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﻱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲨﻴﻌﻪ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻓﻘﺪ
ﻻ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﳏﺪﺑﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻧﺎﺗﺌﹰﺎ .ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻸ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻰﺀ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻰﺀ ﻓﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻭﺳﻂ
ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻄﻴﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ
ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺒﺢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻓﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺒ ﺢ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻘﻪ ﺑﻞ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺪﺭﺝ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻳﺮﻳﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻳﺆﺫﻱ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺑﻔﺮﻁ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ
ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻘﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ،ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺸﺒﺢ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ .ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ
ﻼ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺑﺎﻃ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳍﺪﺏ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ﳛﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﺻﻠﺐ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﻟﲔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﻄﺖ ﰲ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﻭﻣﻸﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﰒ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ،
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻠﺘﺼﻖ ﺑﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲡﻌﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺳﺘﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺪﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺳﺒﻌﹰﺎ.
ﻓﺎﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺭﻱ ،ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﺔ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ .ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ
ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﺘﻨﺴﺞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺴﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻳﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺁﺗﻴﺔ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺁﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻣﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻣﻌﻮﺟﺔ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻄﻮﻝ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻓﺘﺤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻘﺮﺏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﻟﻴﺼﲑ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﹰﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻭﺗﻐﺸﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻓﻀﻠﺔ
ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ .ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻀﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ﺣﺎﺟﺰ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﻃﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻋﻨﻜﺒﻮﺗﻴﺔ ﺃﻱ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﻨﺴﻴﺞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺕ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﻋﻨﻜﺒﻮﺗﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﺠﺒﹰﺎ
ﻟﻠﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﻠﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺍﻟﻀﻮﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻓﻠﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ
ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺒﻄﻞ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﻛﺜﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻭﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﲣﻠﻮ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺩﻗﺎﻕ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻜﻴﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻏﲑ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻘﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻜﺒﻮﺗﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﺟﻌﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﻴﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻭﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﺰﺟﺎﺟﻴﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺟﺎﻭﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺘﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻪ
ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺗﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺪﻭﺍﻡ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻟﻠﺠﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﺪﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﻌﲔ ﻭﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ.
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺒﻴﺔ :ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺛﺨﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻟﲔ
ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﳊﻢ ﺇﺳﻔﻨﺠﻲ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺫﻭ ﲬﻞ ﻭﺧﺸﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺪ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻭﺡ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺔ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻖ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﳝﻨﻌﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻟﻮ ﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﻭﻗﻮﺗﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺜﻘﻮﺑﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻬﺎ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ .ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﺢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺯﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺐ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻧﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﲢﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﺔ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺼﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ :ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺒﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﺔ :ﻭﻫﻲ :ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ :ﻭﲰﻴﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻗﺮﻧﻴﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻓﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺤﺖ ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﳊﺪﻗﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ :ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻐﺸﻲ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ
ﻓﻴﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﺻﻠﺐ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﻭﲰﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺎﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻘﻠﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻬﺎ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺳﻮﻣﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻛﺎﳌﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺭﻗﺎﻕ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﺃﻱ :ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺃﺭﺑﻊ ﻫﻲ ﳍﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺮﺍﻛﺒﺔ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺧﻠﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺛﺖ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺁﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﻕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﹰﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻟﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ
ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺒﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺑﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻃﺒﻘﺘﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳚﻮﺩ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﻻ ﳚﻮﺩ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺃﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﻗﺸﻮﺭ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳍﺪﺏ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻟﺪﻓﻊ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﻪ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﺗﺌﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ
ﻓﻼ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻧﻔﻊ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﺘﲔ ﻭﺇﻻ
ﺗﻌﺮﺿﺘﺎ ﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻣﻐﻄﺎﺗﲔ ﻭﺇﻻ ﺑﻄﻠﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺸﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺣﲔ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺳﺘﺮﳘﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺻﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺫﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺨﻮﻑ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻄﺎﺀ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﻳﻐﻄﻲ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﺟﻔﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺟﻔﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺟﻔﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺟﻔﻨﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻞ ﳛﺮﻛﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺑﺎﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻧﺎﻕ.
ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﻐﻄﻴﻬﺎ ﰒ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻻﻗﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﰲ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺸﻰ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ،ﰒ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺧﻴﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻔﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻔﻒ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﺑﲔ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺷﺤﻤﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻧﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻔﻆ ﻟﻠﻄﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺘﻐﲑ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻃﺎﻗﻴﺘﻪ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻕ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ
ﻼ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺮﻛﻪ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﺏ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﶈﺮﻙ ﻟﻠﺠﻔﻦ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﺃﻥ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺗﺮ ﻓﻘﻂ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻨﺔ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻏﺸﻲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ
ﺍﻧﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻻﻗﻰ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺤﻤﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻧﺎ.
ﺱ ﺍﳍﺪﺏ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻧﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺧﻠﻖ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﻄﻔﺔ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﻟﻴﺤﻔﻆ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻐﺮ ﹴ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﳊﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱄ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺬﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳓﻮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻴﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺬﻯ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﻭﻫﺪﺏ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻘﻠﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﳌﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻭﺣﺒﺴﺘﻪ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻷﺿﺮﺕ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﻨﻊ ﻟﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ
ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻘﻠﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﺪﺏ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﳊﺒﺴﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﺮﺳﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻷﺿﺮﺕ ﺑﺎﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻘﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﺼﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻐﺮﺱ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻔﻨﲔ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﺮﺧﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻐﺮﺳﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰒ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻣﻨﺜﻘﺒﺎﹰ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﻤﺘﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻗﲔ ﳛﺘﺒﺲ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﻀﺮ ﺑﺎﳉﻔﻦ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ
ﻣﻨﺜﻘﺒﺎﹰ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﳉﻔﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺺ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ .ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻐﺮﺱ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﺏ ﻭﻳﺒﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻗﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﱪ ﺇﻻ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻫﺪﺍﺏ ﻷﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﺿﻬﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﺿﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺼﺮ .ﻭﺍﷲ
ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻓﻠﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ
ﻋﺼﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺝ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﳊﺠﺮﻱ ﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ،ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺑﻘﺮﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻻ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲰﻌﻪ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ
ﲰﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺫﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﲜﻤﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻬﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻴﺒﻮﺳﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﲰﻌﻪ ﻟﻘﻮﺗﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲏ
ﻋﻦ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺴﻤﻊ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻠﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺣﱴ
ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻈﻢ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻻ ﺃﺫﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ.
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻭﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻠﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺗﻔﻀﻞ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺩﻣﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ
ﻓﻼ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ .ﻭﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻪ
ﺃﺫﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺕ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺇﻻ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻢ ﻻ ﳛﺮﻛﻮﻥ ﺁﺫﺍﻬﻧﻢ.
ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺃﺫﻧﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺫﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺫﻧﻴﻪ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﻃﺄﻃﺄﺓ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻋﻰ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺫﻧﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺻﺪﻑ ﻣﻌﻮﺝ ﻟﻴﺤﺒﺲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺻﺪﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺁﻟﺔ ﳉﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺭﺃﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺫﻫﻨﺞ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﻌﻮﳚﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺮﳚﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻓﺔ ﳑﻨﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﰲ
ﺛﻘﺐ ﺍﻷﺫﻥ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺎﺳﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻊ ﻛﺎﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻹﺑﺼﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﺇﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﺮﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﳉﻠﻴﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ...ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻟﻜﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺭﺋﺔ ،ﻭﳜﺘﺺ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﻧﻔﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﻪ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﳍﻤﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻭﻣﻨﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﲑ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﹰﺎ
ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﺜﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻖ ﻻﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﻮﻳﻼ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﻲ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﲪﻞ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻋﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻤﻪ ﻭﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﺃﻛﻠﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺷﻲﺀ ﳑﺘﺪ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻟﻴﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻳﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﺍﳋﺮﻃﻮﻡ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﺮﻃﻮﻡ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻒ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺸﺄﻥ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻃﺮﻓﻬﺎ
ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺐ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﺪ ﻭﻣﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﺧﺮﻃﻮﻣﻪ ﻳﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻤﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻤﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﴰﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺘﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﺨﺮ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳊﻚ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﹰﺎ ﰒ ﻳﺘﻀﺎﻳﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﻌﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻠﻴﺄﺧﺬ ﻫﻮﺍ ًﺀ
ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺿﻴﻘﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻓﻠﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﺤﺐ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻨﺸﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﱂ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻮﻕ ﲝﺬﺍﺀ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﻣﻌﲔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﻼﺀ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺎﺑﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﻻﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﻼﺀ،
ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻣﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﲝﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺋﺢ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺓ
ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻱ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﺪﻣﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺷﻢ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻐﻠﻆ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻣﻮﻉ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ
ﳍﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺏ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﲔ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﺿﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ:
ﻗﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ
ﻭﻗﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎﻥ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺼﻔﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺜﻘﺒﺔ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺛﻘﻮﺏ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻓﻴﺔ
ﳏﺎﺫﻳﺔ ﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺸﺒﻴﻬﺘﲔ ﲝﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﲔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﰲ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺛﻘﺐ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﻔﻀﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺋﺢ ﳍﺎ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻗﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺔ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻨﺸﻖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻫﻮ
ﻬﺑﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺗﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﻟﻠﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻭﻗﻮﻳﺖ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺪﺭﻙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺸﻖ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺣﱴ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﺨﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻜﻨﺎ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻣﺘﻸ ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺋﺤﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﲔ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻨﺰﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺘﻮﺯﻉ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﺩﻳﻦ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺘﻨﺸﺎﻕ ﻟﻠﻬﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻔﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻔﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻤﻪ.
ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺘﻘﻄﻴﻊ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ
ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ.
ﻭﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻕ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﻔﺴﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﻴﻄﺎﺭ ﻓﻢ ﻓﺮﺱ ﺑﺂﻟﺔ
ﺳﺪﺕ ﻣﻨﺨﺮﻳﻪ ﻓﻤﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﻔﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺃﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻭﻳﻨﻘﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻤﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﻳﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻭﺑﺎﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ
ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺑﺒﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻋﻮﺯ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻀﻎ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻠﻌﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻛﺒﲑﺓ ﰲ ﻓﻤﻪ ﻭﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻠﻊ ﺍﳌﺄﻛﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺗﺼﻐﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻜﻪ ﻟﻠﻌﺾ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ،ﲞﻼﻑ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺴﻼﺡ ﻟﻪ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻀﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺴﲑ ﻣﺄﻛﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻔﻤﻪ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺨﺬ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ،
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻜﻪ ﺍﳌﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺃﺧﻒ ﻭﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ .ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﳛﺮﻙ ﻓﻜﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﺎﺡ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳛﺮﻙ ﻓﻜﻪ
ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﳊﻮﺍﺱ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺁﻟﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﻠﺘﺼﻖ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺕ
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺛﻨﲔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺼﺎﻕ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻣﹰﺎ ﺑﺈﺛﻨﲔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺕ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺍﳌﻀﻎ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﳜﺘﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﺼﻖ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻩ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺃﻟﺴﻨﺔ
ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺔ ﺑﻴﺾ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﻷﻥ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﻤﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ
ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻌﲏ ﺑﺎﳊﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ
ﻓﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﺗﺸﺮﳛﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻮﺯﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻠﺼﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻭ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻭﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺳﻘﻒ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻬﺎﺓ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﻄﻴﻞ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺴﻘﻒ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﰲ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮﺓ
ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﳊﻤﻲ ﻋﺼﱯ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻪ ﺛﻼﺙ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﺯﺗﺎﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻐﺎﻧﻎ ﻭﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﳍﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ
ﺍﳊﻠﻖ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻓﻠﲑﺟﻊ ﻏﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻛﻴﻒ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳛﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻋﻀﻮﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ؟
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺮﻛﹰﺎ ﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻋﻀﻮﹰﺍ ﻭﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﳌﻤﻀﻮﻍ ﻭﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺸﺒﺜﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻭﻳﺪﻓﻌﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻭﻟﺬ ﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﳍﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﺁﻓﺔ ﺗﻀﻌﻒ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺻﺎﻬﺑﺎ ﻳﺒﻮﺳﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﻭﻋﺼﺐ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ
ﲢﻘﻴﻘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺼﺐ ﻭﺭﺑﺎﻁ ...ﻭﳊﻢ ﺟﺎﺳﻲ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺜﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻞ.
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺭﺑﺎﻁ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﺍﻥ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻠﺘﲔ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻤﻼﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻀﻴﻘﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺎ ﳛﺎﺫﻱ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺝ
ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﻴﻖ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ
ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻠﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻓﺎﺕ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺴﺮ ﰲ ﺑﻠﻊ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺭﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﺋﺎﹰ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ .ﻭﻣﻨﺘﻘ ﻼﹰ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻠﲔ .ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﻫﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺟﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﳛﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﺱ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﲨﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺪﻋﻲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻭﳓﻦ ﳒﻌﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ:
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺄﻣﺎ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﻀﻮ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﳎﺮﻳﲔ ،ﻭﳘﺎ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺃﺷﺮﻑ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺮﻯ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻵﻓﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺮﺍﻩ ،ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ
ﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺃﺷﺮﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﺮﻑ
ﳏﺮﻭﺳﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺴﻦ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻮﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ.
ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ؟ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺳﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻳﱪﺩ ﻻ
ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺧﻠﻒ
ﻼ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺘﺒﻄﻞ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬ ﺍﺀ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻔﺌﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﲔ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﲔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻳﲔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﲞﻼﻑ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﹰﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻋﺎﺋﻖ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻣﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ
ﺍﳌﺆﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳓﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺰﺍﲪﺔ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻗﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ
ﺃﻋﺴﺮ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺑﺎﻧﻘﺮﺍﻋﻪ ﺑﺎﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻖ ﻟﻪ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﺰﺩﺭﺩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭ ﻫﻲ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﻳﱪﺯ ﻋﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻣﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻷﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﻕ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺯ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﺃ ﻋﺎﱄ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻊ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ
ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﺎﻥ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﳍﺎ
ﻳﺴﺘﻌﲔ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺑﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻓﻴﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﳏﻴﻂ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻨﺸﻖ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﲤﺪﺩ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺩﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﹰﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﳍﺎ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺪﺩ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻓﻴﺔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ .ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺃﻭ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﹰﺎ
ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﰒ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ
ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﺍﺋﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻳﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻑ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻗﺴﻤﺔ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳓﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻱ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺗﻜﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻟﻴﺘﻮﺳﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺆﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﳚﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺃﻣﻠﺲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺒﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻌﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﺑﺴﹰﺎ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺒﻮﺭﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺣﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺯﻝ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻋﻔﻮﻧﺔ
ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺩ ﳍﺎ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺣﺎﺩﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﺯﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻟﻴﻘﻞ ﺗﻀﺮﺭﻩ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ
ﺍﳌﺘﺮﺩﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﻟﻴﻘﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﻟﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺸﻘﺎﻕ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ
ﺣﲔ ﺍﺷﺘﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﶈﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﻔﺲ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﺑﻘﺮﻉ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﺑﻘﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺒﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ
ﺑﻘﺮﻉ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻨﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﻗﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻟﻔﻢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍ ﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺰﻣﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﻟﻴﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻼﻫﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺰﺍﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻗﺮﻋﻪ ﳉﺮﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﳓﺼﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺻﺎﺩﻑ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ
ﻭﺍﳓﺼﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻳﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺻﺎﺩﻑ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻀﻴﻖ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻀﻴﻖ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﺷﺪ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺗﺒﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﳊﻨ ﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﲰﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺰﻣﺎﺭ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺰﻣﺎﺭ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻧﺒﻮﺑﺔ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ.
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻗﺼﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﺎﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﲤﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﳉﺮﻣﻪ
ﻃﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻮﺳﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻠﺒﺲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺳﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﲤﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺘﺒﻄﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻨﻘﺺ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺍﳌﺆﺩﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﺕ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻗﺼﺐ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻔﻮﻫﺎﺕ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﻡ ،ﻭﻋﺪﻡ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻟﻴﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ،ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻖ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﺕ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺟﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﲢﺪﺙ ﳍﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺚ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﻞ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻭﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻟﻴﺠﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍ ﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺗﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺮﺍﺣﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺗﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ ﲤﺴﻜﻪ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻔﺴﺪ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺗﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻄﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺇﺫ ﺍ ﻻ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ
ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻧﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻆ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﻓﻀﻮﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺚ
ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺟﺐ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻀﺮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﳜﻔﻰ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺳﻬﻠﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺪﺍﻉ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﻧﻔﺚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳋﻄﺮ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺇﻻ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻛﺜﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺿﺮﻬﺑﺎ ﺩﻓﻌﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﺼﺪﺍﻉ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻓﻴﺸﺘﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺁﻟﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻏﻀﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻋﻀﻠﻬﺎ
ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﻀﺎﺭ ﻳﻒ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﻋﻀﻼﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺃﻏﺸﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺿﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺣﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ
ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺮﻍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻨﻚ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺴﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﳌﺰﻣﺎﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﺎﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺪﻻﺓ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻢ
ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻟﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺕ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻴﻨﻪ .
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺑﺎﻻﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﻤﺔ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﻘﺖ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﺭﺗﻔﻌﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺴﻤﲔ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﺸﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﺎﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺪ ﻳﺘﻼﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻤﱴ ﺗﺴﻔﻞ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ،ﺗﺴﻔﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﱴ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ.
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻱ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎﻝ
ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺷﺪ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺷﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻠﻨﺎ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﹰﺎ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺎﺫﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ،
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﺴﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﺴﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﻞ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪ ﰲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺃﻭ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺳﺎﻟﻜﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺑﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﻘﻤﺔ ﺍﳒﺬﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺃﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ
ﺑﺄﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺑﺄﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳊﻠﻖ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺏ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺴﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻻﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﳒﺬﺍﺏ ﲤﺪﺩ ﺍﳊﻨﺠﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺿﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻗﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻻﺯﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﻻ ﳚﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻻﻟﺘﺤﺎﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﱐ ﻓﻸﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍ ﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻭﺳﺨﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻴﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺮﺷﺢ
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺑﺎﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﳝﺘﺰﺝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪﻱ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ
ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﱐ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻫﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﱃ
ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﱐ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻏﺬﺍﺀﻫﺎ ﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﳑﺎ ﳝﺪ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪﻱ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻟﻴﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻀﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻭﺑﻄﻠﺖ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻪ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﹰﺎ ﻟﻸﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪﺓ
ﺍﻟﻠﻄﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﻮﺻﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺒﺔ ﻭﻷﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ
ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻌﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺜﹰﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﻸﻥ ﳝﻸ ﺍﳋﻠﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻀﻮ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻤﲔ ﻭﳓﻮﳘﺎ ،ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺭﺧﻮﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ ﳝﺎﻧﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺭﺧﻮﹰﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﻣﺎﺋﻲ
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻲ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﺎﳌﺘﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺑﺪﻡ ﺻﻔﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﳑﺎ ﻻ
ﻼ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺤﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳊﻤﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﺨ ﹰ
ﲤﺘﻠﺊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ
ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﻤﺎ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻣﺔ ﺑﻘﺴﻤﲔ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﳝﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﴰﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻠﺆﻫﺎ ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻤﻞ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺪﻕ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﻫﻮ ﰲ
ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ،ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺧﻼﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﳓﺮﺍﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻘﺴﻮﻡ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﲔ ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻳﻐﺸﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ
ﳝﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﰲ ﻳﺴﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﻗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻓﻴﻤﺮ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻭ ﻳﻠﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﺮ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻭﻳﻠﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ،ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﺤﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍ ﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻏﻼﻓﻪ ﻓﻼ ﳝﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﲜﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﺮﻗﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻏﻼﻓﻪ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺼﻔﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻳﺘﻼﻗﻴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺛﻘﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﻟﻠﻤﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻭﺍﻷﺻﻐﺮ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻷﻬﺑﺮ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﻓﻬﻤﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺮﻕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻓﻸﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﺮ ﺑﺎﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ.
ﻭﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻻ ﳜﺮﻕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺑﻞ ﳝﺮ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻩ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳝﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﻛﺌﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﲢﺮﻛﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ
ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻱ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻭﻳﻮﺯﻋﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻟﺘﺤﻴﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻭﻳﻠﻄﻔﻪ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺎﹰ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﲣﻠﺨﻞ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﳏﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻻ ﺗﺘﺴﻊ
ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﺮﻗﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺁﺧﺮ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ
ﻭﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﺎﻓﺔ ﻫﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ
ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﳝﺪﻫﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻏﺬﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﺋﻴﹰﺎ
ﻳﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻲ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲟﺨﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻔﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻫﻮﺍﺋﻲ
ﻭﺍﻣﺘﺰﺍﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﺧﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﺥ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﺰﺍﺝ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻓﺒﻪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﲤﺘﺰﺝ
ﻭﺗﻨﻄﺒﺦ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﺥ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺘﺰﺍﺝ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻧﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﻤﻠﻮﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﺔ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺅﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻄﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻗﺪ ﻳﱪﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻳﻠﺔ
ﻭﻳﻜﺜﻒ ﻓﺘﺒﻄﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻄﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ
ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻳﱪﺩ ﻭﻳﻔﺎﺭﻗﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻠﻄﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻳﺮﻕ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ
ﻭﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻳﻨﻄﺒﺦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﳜﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﻐﺬﻭﻩ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﲟﻘﺪﺍﺭ
ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻠﻄﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ،
ﻭﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺁﺧﺮ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳊﺎﻭﻱ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺡ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﳚﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷ ﳝﻦ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﳝﺘﺰﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺗﻠﻄﻴﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ
ﻼ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻌﻤﻖ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﲔ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻌﺘﻪ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﹰﺎ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﳍﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﲔ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﲔ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻓﻴﺴﺮﻉ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻠﻄﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻭﻳﺴﺮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻟﻴﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻟﻔﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻔﲔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻏﲑ
ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻳﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ
ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻏﻠﻆ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻗﺔ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻛﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ
ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﰲ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺻﻨﻮﺑﺮﻳﺎﹰ .ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ .ﻭﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﻓﻀﻞ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ
ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻏﻠﻆ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻗﺔ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﺑﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻛﺘﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﰲ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺻﻨﻮﺑﺮﻳﺎﹰ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﶈﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻲ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺻﻠﺒﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ
ﻋﻦ ﻟﻮ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻟﻮ ﻥ
ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﻪ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻫﺒﻨﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﱄ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺿﻲ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺳﻚ ﺍﳌﺆﺭﺏ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻟﻴﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺩﻗﻖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻛﺎﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﺘﻠﻰ ﲟﻤﺎﺳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ .ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﳑﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﺼﺢ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻋﻈﻢ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﰲ ﳏﻴﻂ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻻ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﳑﺘﻠﺌﺎﹰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﱂ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻀﻌﻒ ﻟﻘﻮﺗﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻛﺎﻷﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﺻﻼﺑﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ
ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﳉﺜﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ
ﺍﻟﺮﺑﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺑﻄﻮﻥ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻄﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳑﻠﻮﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﳑﻠﻮﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ .ﻭﻻ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ .ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻳﻜﺬﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ.
ﻓﺎﳊﺎﺟﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻨﲔ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﻴﻀﻴﻊ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻇﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ
ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﻭﺗﺼﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺭﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺩﻉ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﺘﻐﺬﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺜﻴﻒ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻳﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻭﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻡ ﻟﻄﻴﻒ ،ﻭﳎﺮﻯ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﺒﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻇﻦ ﺛﺒﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻄﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺭﻧﺎﻩ .ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳝﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﳝﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻆ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺭﻕ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﻞ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻠﻄﻒ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﻕ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﺔ ﻭﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫ ﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻳﻨﻀﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﻄﻮﻟﻪ.
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻋﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻴﻪ ﺑﻄﻨﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻂ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻀﻤﺎﻡ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻋﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺗﻄﻮﻟﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ
ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺮﺍﺽ ﻓﻤﻤﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﺃﺭﻓﻊ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﺎﺋﻞ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺑﺎﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻓﻴﺠﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳚﺘﺬﺏ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ.
ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ
ﺑﺎﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﻒ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺬﺏ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳋﻼﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺃﻟﻄﻒ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺬﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﰒ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﺜﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻋﻮﺯ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﻭﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﲔ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺩﻓﻊ ﻓﻀﻮﳍﺎ
ﻭﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﻟﻠﻄﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ،ﻭﺍﷲ
ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﲝﺮﻛﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻱ.
ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﺸﻌﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺄﻧﺎ ﻣﺮﻳﺪﻳﻦ
ﳍﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻫﻞ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻋﻀﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻻ؟ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻮﻍ ﺍﻟﻨﺰﺍﻉ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻔﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﲜﻮﻫﺮ
ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﻭﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﺬﺕ ،ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻠﺪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﳍﺎ .ﻭﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﺍﻧﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻠﺪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﻭﺑﻪ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻃﻔﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺑﻴﺾ،
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﳜﺮﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﱂ ﳚﺪ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺃﻣﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻐﺬﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ
ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻭﻻﺩﺗﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻯ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﱭ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﺳﻮﺍﻩ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺣﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﹰﺍ ﺑﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﻍ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻠﺔ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻮﻍ .ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ
ﻓﺎﺣﺸﺔ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺒﻠﺖ ﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺛﺪﻳﻪ ﺻﻐﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻤﻠﺖ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻪ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻧﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺛﺪﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﳛﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺟﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺖ ﺯﻭﺟﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻃﻔﻞ ﺭﺿﻴﻊ .ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺟﺪﺓ ﻳﺘﺨﺬﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺿﻌﺔ .ﻓﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﰲ ﺛﺪﻳﻪ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﻋﺼﺮ ﺛﺪﻳﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﱭ ﻛﺜﲑ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﻛﱪﺍﺀ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺩﻣﺸﻖ ﺃﺗﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﺟﺤﺸﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻐﻠﺔ.
ﻓﺪﺭ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻠﺔ ﻟﱭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﳚﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺪﻱ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻠﺔ .ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﻛﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻠﺔ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﳉﺤﺶ ﺧﻠﻔﻬﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺍﳉﺤﺶ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺻﻄﺒﻞ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﳚﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺪﻱ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻠﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﲤﺸﻲ ﲢﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ.
ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺭﻛﻮﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﻠﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻄﻤﺖ ﺍﳉﺤﺶ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻮ ﺍﺹ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺛﺪﻳﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ ،ﻭﺛﺪﻳﺎ
ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻞ ﻳﻘﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﺭﻩ .ﻭﺛﺪﻳﺎ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ
ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ .ﻭﻃﻔﻞ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻀﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺪﻱ ﺃﻣﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻷﻥ
ﻃﻔﻞ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻌﻮﺩ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻋﻘﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﺑﻞ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﰲ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻀﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ .ﻷﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﻘﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ
ﺍﺭﺗﻀﺎﻋﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﹰﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺭﻛﻲ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﻌﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﻠﻤﺔ ﰲ ﻓﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﻘﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺭﻛﻲ ﺃﻣﻪ .ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺃﺛﺪﺍﺋﻬﺎ
ﻻﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻭﻻﺩ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ .ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﻟﺪﺍﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺛﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺏ ﻓﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻳﻮﻟﺪ ﳍﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻮ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﳍﺎ ﲦﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﺛﺪﺍﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﳊﻢ ﻏﺪﺩﻱ ﻻ ﺣﺲ ﻟﻪ ،ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﻥ ﻭﻟﺒﻴﺎﺿﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ.
ﻼ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺷﺒﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺪﺩﻱ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻞ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﺇﱃ ﲪﺮﺓ ﻟﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻗﻞ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺃﻏﻠﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻟﻮ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻕ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻠﱭ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﺿﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﺽ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻱ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮﻑ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﳜﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﶈﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻮﻡ ﻭﺑﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺪﻋﻮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﳚﺘﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺘﺎﺀ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺸﺘﺎﺀ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ،ﻭﺑﺎﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺒﺎﺕ .ﻭﳌﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﺃﻭ
ﹰﻻ ﻓﺄﻭﻻ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﲡﻒ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﳊﺔ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻐﺬﻭﺍ ﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺟﺴﻤﹰﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺫﺍ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﳍﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﻟﺔ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ،ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺃﺧﻼﻁ .ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﺗﻘﻞ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﰲ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺱ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﺗﺴﺘﻤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺃﺧﻼﻁ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﺔ
ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺧﻼﻁ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻏﺬﻳﺔ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳋﺒﺰ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻋﻀﻮ ﳛﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻧﺴﻤﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺳﻨﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻠﻐﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺳﻨﺒﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺎﹰ
ﻭﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻟﻠﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ
ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻁ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭﻻ ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺇﻥ ﺑﻘﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ
ﻓﺴﺪ ﻭﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻪ ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﲤﻴﻴﺰﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ،
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻌﺪﺓ ﻳﻬﻀﻢ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻏﺬﻳﺔ
ﻓﺘﺤﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺑﺴﺒﺒﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲣﻠﻴﺺ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﺘﺠﺘﺬﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭﲣﻄﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﻏﲑ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﻳﺆﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﺣﺘﺎﺟﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﺘﺨﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳉﻬﺔ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔ ﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲤﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺷﺪﺓ ﺗﻀﺮﺭﻩ ﻭﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺣﻪ ﺑﻘﺬﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ
ﻛﺎﳌﻄﺒﺦ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﻋﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﻠﻖ
ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺄﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﻱﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﺮﻱﺀ .ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ،ﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻪ،
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ .ﻭﺍ ﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.ﺩﺓ ﺗﻀﺮﺭﻩ ﻭﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺣﻪ ﺑﻘﺬﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻭﳒﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ
ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺧﻨﺔ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺎﳌﻄﺒﺦ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﺭ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﻋﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﻠﻖ ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﺄﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﳌﺮﻱﺀ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﺮﻱﺀ.
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ. ﻓﻠﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ،ﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻪ ،ﻭﳒﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﻭﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭﹰﺍ ﻓﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﺮﺽ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﺄﱂ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﳓﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻒ
ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﳋﻨﺠﺮﻱ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺪﻱ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﳒﺪﻩ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﳓﺲ ﺑﻪ
ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺼﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﺻﻔﺮﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺼﺎﺋﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﻒ .ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﰲ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﺪ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﳓﺲ ﻟﺬﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺜﺮ
ﺍﻧﺼﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺭﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻗﻴﺎ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﳓﺲ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ
ﻟﺬﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻤﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻉ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ
ﳓﺲ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻉ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ .ﺃﻋﲏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻐﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﻀﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﳋﻨﺠﺮﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ
ﻟﻔﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ،
ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳜﺮﻕ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻭﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻔﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﺃﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ .ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺺ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﰒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﻓﺎﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﻭﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﳏﺎﺫﺍﺓ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻧﺰﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﳓﺲ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺳﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﺳﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ ﳍﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﻡ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﶈﺪﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ﻗﺒﻴﺢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻬﻧﻢ ﳚﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺸﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﺗﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ .ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻓﻮﻗﻬﺎ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺘﺢ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﺣﺴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻟﻠﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﻳﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻟﻴﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﹰﺎ ﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﺫ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﻭﺳﻄﺢ ﳊﻤﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ
ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺰﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺓ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺻﻔﺎﻭﺗﻪ ﻭﺧﺎﻟﺼﺘﻪ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻳﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﲜﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺭﻕ ﻭﺳﺎﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﺎﺗﻔﻪ ﻭﻳﺒﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻰ ﻓﺈﻥ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ
ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺛﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺃﺭﺿﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻒ ﻭﳚﺘﻤﻊ
ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﻒ ﻭﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻻﻥ ﻭﺳﺎﻝ
ﻭﱂ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻜﺎﺛﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻰ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺘﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ
ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺑﺲ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺒﻄﺎﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﱵ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻟﲔ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻻ ﻟﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﺳﻴﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ ﺑﲔ
ﺑﻄﺎﻧﱵ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻞ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻟﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻄﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﻤﻬﺎ ﺃﻟﲔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺴﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ
ﻟﻴﺸﺘﺪ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﻮﻉ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻟﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﺒﻞ ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳊﺲ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳊﻤﻴﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺍﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺎﻭﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﻬﻀﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﻼ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻨﻬﻀﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺯﻣﻨﹰﺎ ﻃﻮﻳ ﹰ
ﺑﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻀﺮﺭﻩ ﺑﻠﺬﻉ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻋﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ
ﺍﳍﺎﺿﻤﺔ ﺇﻻ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻳﺒﻮﺳﺔ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﺲ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﺲ ﳊﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﺨﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﻱ ﻭﻳﺰﻳﺪ
ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻟﻠﻬﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪﻱ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺭﺷﺢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻘﻄﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺢ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻛﺎﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﻕ
ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺏ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺘﺢ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﰒ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻤﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺳﻬﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ .ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﲜﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺎﻭﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﳑﺎ ﻻ
ﻳﺼﺢ.
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ.
ﻼ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﲢﺪﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻓﺘﺘﻀﺮﺭ
ﻭﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻛﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻞ ﻟﺘﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ .ﻭﺳﻄﺤﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺭﻡ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﳝﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻀﺮﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻬﻴﺄ ﻟﻼﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﳋﻄﻮﻁ .ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺪﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﲢﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺰﻭﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﲰﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺪﻓﺌﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳍﺎﺿﻤﺔ.
ﻭﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺿﻤﺔ ﻟﻸﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳊﺲ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﺟﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺸﺪﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺨﻠﻮ ﻭﻟﻠﺬﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺼﺒﺔ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻭﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﳐﺮﺟﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ
ﻭﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﺍﻷﺩﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻬﻀﻢ ﺑﺬﻭﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺈﺣﺎﻟﺔ
ﺻﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﰲ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻀﻢ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻄﺒﺦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻃﺒﺦ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﲡﺬﺏ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻄﺒﻮﺥ ﻏﻠﻴﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﺦ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﳏﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ
ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻷﻷ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﰲ
ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻓﻴﱪﺩﻫﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺴﺨﻦ ﻹﻓﺎﺩﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ
ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱪﺩ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ .ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺟﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ
ﻼ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻞ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺋ ﹰ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺴﺨﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﱪﺩ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻨﻌﻪ ﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﲟﻼﻕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻓﻴﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﻔﻴﺪ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻳﺴﲑﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺷﺤﻤﻲ
ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺩﺳﻮﻣﺘﻪ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ
ﻭﺇﱃ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺳﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻟﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻀﺮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﳊﺲ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﻱ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻫﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﺄﰐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺷﻌﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺼﻔﻰ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﺎﻟﻄﻪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲣﺎﻟﻄﻪ
ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ .ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﲔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻋﻦ ﳊﻢ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺪﺩﻳﹰﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻵﰐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﺤﻢ ﻛﺎﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳊﻢ ﺭﺧﻮ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻘﺮﺍﺱ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﲢﻠﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻼ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻴﻨﺎﹰ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻼ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺳﻮﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻫﻨﻴﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﺭﺧﻮﹰﺍ ﺭﻫ ﹰ
ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻗﺒﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻳﺸﺘﻌﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎﺭ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮ
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻹﺩﻓﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﺟﺮﻣﹰﺎ ﺷﺤﻤﻴﹰﺎ ﻻ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﺭﺧﻮﹰﺍ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﲔ ﻷﻥ
ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱪﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺪﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻹﺩﻓﺎﺋﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ
ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺟﺮﻣﹰﺎ ﺷﺤﻤﻴﹰﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺃﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﻦ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﻛﱪ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ ،ﻭﺟﻌﻞ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻛﺜﻴﻔﺎﹰ ﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺭﻗﺘﻪ ﲝﺼﺮ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﻞ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻭﻻ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺘﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻏﻠﻈﻪ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻭﺃﻳﺴﺮﻩ .ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻏﻠﻆ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻕ ،ﻓﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﻟﻴﺘﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻫﻦ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻋﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻹﳔﺮﺍﻕ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺍﻟﻴﺒﺲ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﺍﶈﺮﻗﺔ ،ﻭﻫﻲ
ﺍﳌﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻕ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺗﺴﺨﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺘﻬﺎ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﺎﻭﻁ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲟﻨﺎﺑﺖ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﺇﻧﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻧﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ .ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ
ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﲢﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻄﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﻟﺬﻟﻚ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻄﺒﺦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ،ﻓﺘﺼﲑ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ
ﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﳑﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﻌﻠﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻼﻗﺖ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻼ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻼﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻠﺖ ﻭﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻌ ﹰ
ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻛﻞ
ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ
ﺍﳌﻼﺀﻣﺔ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﺭﻃﺒﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺣﱴ ﺇﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﺖ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺖ ﺃﻥ
ﻼ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﺨﻨﺘﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﺭﻗﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺪﺙ ﳍﺎ ﻗﺎﺳﺮ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺃﻋﺪﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ .ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ
ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻟﻮ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﳌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺰﻳﺪﺕ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺳﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻄﻞ
ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﺮ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﱂ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﳌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﳎﺘﻬﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ
ﻟﺘﺰﻭﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻫﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻞ ﲢﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﹰﺍ ﺭﻃﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﲢﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ
ﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻓﺘﺼﲑ ﻧﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﲢﻴﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺼﲑ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻄﺮﻭﻥ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ﻧﻄﺮﻭﻧﹰﺎ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻭﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﻗﺒﻮﳍﺎ
ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﶈﻴﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﶈﻴﻞ ﻋﺴﺮﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻧﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﺃﻋﺴﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ
ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻧﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ،
ﻭﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺗﻌﺴﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﻧﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﺽ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﻬﺗﺎ ﻳﺎﺑﺴﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ
ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺭﺻﺎﺻﹰﺎ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺫﻫﺒﹰﺎ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﲟﺰﺍﺝ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ
ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﺗﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﲟﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺻﺎﺹ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻃﺎﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺻﺎﺹ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻧﺪﻱ ﻛﱪ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﺐ ﻭﻗﺪ ﳛﻴﻞ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺟﺴﻤﹰﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺳﺨﻨﺖ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺳﺨﻮ ﻧﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻷﻛﺴﲑ ﳛﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺻﺎﺹ ﻓﻀﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﺎﺱ ﺫﻫﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﻴﻞ ﻻ ﳛﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﺑﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﺘﺼﻮﺭ
ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻟﻜﺮﻣﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﻪ.
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﻟﻴﺼﲑ ﻧﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻧﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ
ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻌﻄﻴﻪ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﳍﺎ.
ﻼ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻠﻮﻏﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺪ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺔ ﻓﻴﻔﺎﺽ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻛﺴﲑ ﳛﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺻﺎﺹ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﲢﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﻭﺃﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﻫﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺃﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ .ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﺄﻃﻠﻘﻨﺎ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﲑ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲝﺜﲔ:
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻟﻴﻔﻴﺘﻪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﹰﺎ ﻗﺪ ﳛﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻋﲏ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳋﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﺃﲪﺮ ﻓﺈﺣﺎﻟﺔ
ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﻘﺮﻳﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳛﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﳛﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻬﻞ ﺻﲑﻭﺭﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺔ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﺳﹰﺎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻋﲏ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﺃﲪﺮ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﲢﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺻﺎﳊﹰﺎ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﳛﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﲪﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﻥ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﲪﺮ ﺍﻟﻠﻮﻥ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﲪﺮ
ﺍﻟﻠﻮﻥ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻪ ﳏﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﺃﲪﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﺩﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﺪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻮﺩ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﺯ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻮﺩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ
ﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺩ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎﻣﻨﺎ ﻳﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﲨﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﺯ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﳝﺘﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﺎﺓ ﻣﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﻌﲑﻩ ﻭﺑﻄﺒﺨﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻬﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﺑﺘﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﳑﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﺑﺎﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﺴﻘﻴﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﺴﻤﻴﻬﺎ ﳓﻦ :ﺃﺻﻮ ﹰﻻ
ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻢ :ﻓﺮﻭﻋﹰﺎ ﻭﺷﻌﺒﹰﺎ.
ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﻤﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺃﺻﻮ ﹰﻻ .ﻭﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌﺔ ﰒ ﲡﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ
ﻓﻮﻫﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻔﻮﻫﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺱ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳚﺬﺏ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ
ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺨﻠﻮ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﳉﺬﺏ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﶈﺪﺏ
ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻷﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺤﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﺭﻳﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳊﺪﺑﺔ.
ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻧﻜﻢ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻷﻥ ﺍﶈﺪﺏ ﻻ ﳚﺬﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﻷﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺤﺎﻥ
ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻻ ﳚﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﶈﺪﺏ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ؟
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺮ ﻻ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻱ ﺑﻞ ﻟﲑﻗﻖ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﳎﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﶈﺪﺏ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﻑ ﺟﺬﺑﺖ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﻟﺘﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻭﱂ ﳚﺬﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻐﻨﻴﺎﹰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ
ﻷﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﳐﻠﻮﻗﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﰒ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻳﻌﺪ ﳍﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺒﺾ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻹﻓﺎﺩﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺰﻳﺔ ﻻ
ﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﺾ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﻓﺎﺩ ﺗﱪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﱪﻳﺪﻩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﳌﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻻ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺘﱪﻳﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﻮﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﺮﺑﻄﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻳﻐﺸﻲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﺍﺧﺘﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﺪﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﻓﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺧﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻻ
ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺧﻠﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳍﺎﺿﻤﺔ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﺋﺰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﺧﻠﻞ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﻤﻴﺰﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﻐﻨﺎﻃﻴﺲ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺳﺎﺭﻳﻘﺎ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻳﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﰲ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻻ ﲣﻠﻮ
ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺍﻻﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻃﺒﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻳﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ
ﻛﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺟﺰﻡ ﺑﺜﺒﻮﺗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺛﺒﻮﺗﻪ ﺃﻣﻴﻞ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻬﺗﻴﺌﺔ
ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ .ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻛﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﺈﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺛﺖ ﺍﻹﺳﻬﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﻱ
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺤﺞ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺗﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﻪ ﻭﺻﻔﺎﻭﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺛﻔﻠﻪ ﻭﻓﺎﺳﺪﻩ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ
ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺭﺩﻱﺀ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﻌﻔﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻓﺴﺪ ﺃﻓﺴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ .ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﻧﻌﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺃﺟﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺍ ﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲤﻨﻊ
ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﲤﻨﻊ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺘﻀﺮﺭ
ﳊﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﻋﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻃﺎﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﺣﺘﺒﺎﺳﻪ ﻭﺧﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺒﺨﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﻋﻔﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ
ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻠﺬﻋﻬﺎ ﻭﳛﻮﺟﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﳊﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺬﻉ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﻭﺳﺮﻋﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻗﺴﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺍﶈﺘﺒﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻳﻠﺬﻋﻪ ﻭﳛﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﺩﻓﻊ
ﻣﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﺋﻖ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻗﺴﻂ ﻣﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺧﺮ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ .ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﻋﺎﺀ
ﳛﻔﻈﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻼﻥ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻨﻘﻴﺔ
ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺴﺪ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻪ .ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﻔﻊ ﻬﺑﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺃﺧﺮ ﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ
ﻭﺗﻨﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﺰﺟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﻊ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺣﺪﺙ
ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺭﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺁﻻﻡ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﻮﻟﻨﺞ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﲡﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﺎ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ
ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺗﻨﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻄﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻛﺜﺮ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺣﺪﺛﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﲑﻗﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺻﻔﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻓﻢ ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﺮﺳﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺗﺼﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺭﺍﹰ ،ﻭﱂ ﳒﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺢ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻌﻘﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺘﺴﻊ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﲑﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺴﻂ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ .ﻓﻤﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﺔ ﻗﻠﻴ ﻼﹰ ،ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻌﺪﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺮﺷﺤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ.
ﻼ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺃﻣﻌﺎﺋﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺼﻔﹰﺎ ﻳﻘﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻠﻪ .ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﻣﻌﺪﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﺮﺷﺢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻒ ﺃﻣﻌﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺑﻠﻎ ﺍﳔﻔﺎﺽ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﻘﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻻﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ
ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻔﺬﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻷﺳﻘﻄﺖ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﺎﻡ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﺎﱄ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻓﻬﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻐﻢ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻲﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺮﻁ ﰲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺻﺤﺔ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺔ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻔﺮﻏﺔ ﺛﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﺈﻥ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻕ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻓﺎﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻻ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﻉ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻼﺯﻡ ﻟﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﻉ
ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲤﻨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳊﺲ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ
ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺟﻮﻉ ﳜﺮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﻕ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻳﺘﻜﻔﻞ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﺪﺓ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﻉ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺃﳌﹰﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﳛﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﳛﻮﺝ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﻲ ﰲ ﲢﺼﻴﻠﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﱂ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻮﻉ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻷﻣﺮ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳍﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﳛﺪﺛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻳﻼﻣﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻀﻌﻒ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﱂ ﳍﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﺛﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺈﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺳﻮﺀ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺣﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﺪﺙ ﻟﻀﻌﻔﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﱂ ﺑﺈﺣﺪﺍﺙ
ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﻭﻳﺮﺗﺪ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻟﲑﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﻌﺴﺮ
ﺇﺯﺍﻟﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﲑ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﳌﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﹰﺍ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻋﺪﺩﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻓﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺴﻮﺱ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﳛﺲ ﻭﻳﺆﱂ ﺃﳌﹰﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﹰﺍ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﺫﻉ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺍﻉ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻘﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳛﺲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﳛﺲ ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻠﺘﻬﺎ
ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺆﳌﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳌﻀﻤﻀﺔ ﺑﺎﳋﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳋﺮﺩﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺤﻮﻕ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺧﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻭﺧﻠﻮ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻻﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻟﺬﻉ ﻳﺆﱂ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﳛﻮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﻠﻒ
ﲢﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻼﺫﻉ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻋﻪ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻻ ﳏﺮﺿﹰﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻋﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﺬﻉ ﺑﻐﲑ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺇﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻃﻌﻤﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﺾ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻤﻮﺿﺔ ﻣﻊ
ﻗﺒﺾ ﻳﺸﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻳﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻤﻊ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻌﻤﲔ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻏﻠﻴﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﶈﺪﺙ ﻟﻨﻀﺠﻬﺎ
ﺇﺫﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻃﻌﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺣﻼﻭﺓ ﻭﻋﻔﻮﺻﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ
ﻧﻀﺠﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﲪﺾ ﻃﻌﻤﻬﺎ ﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﻴﺤﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ
ﺗﺮﺩ ﳐﺰﻭﻧﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﺻﻼﺣﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﻧﻀﺎﺟﻬﺎ ﰒ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ
ﻓﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺟﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ.
ﻼ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺘﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﺘﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﻸﻬﻧﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﲤ ﹰ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ.
ﻼ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺘﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻄﻴﻞ ﻟﺴﺎﱐ .ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻄﻴ ﹰ
ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ .ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲰﻦ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﺌﻼ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪ ﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ
ﻭﳓﻒ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﱂ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻣﺸﺘﻤ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ
ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺑﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺘﻪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺻﻔﺎﻭﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﺎﺗﺖ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻬﺗﻴﺌﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻟﻺﻬﻧﻀﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻴﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻁ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻐﺘﺬﻳﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻀﻢ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺄﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﻓﻌﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻟﺘﺤﻴﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﲞﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻭﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﰎ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﳍﺬﻳﻦ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻟﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻬﻀﻤﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻀﻤﺖ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻀﺮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻘﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺑﻌﺪ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺴﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﺪﺧﻦ ﺃﻭ ﳛﺘﺮﻕ ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﲝﺎﻝ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﰎ
ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺿﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻼ ﻟﻐﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻓﺨﺮﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻲﺀ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲝﻴﺚ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻴﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﰲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ
ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻳﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺴﻔ ﹰ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻠﺘﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﺮﺟﹰﺎ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻓﻴﻔﻮﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﳚﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻮﺍﺀﻩ ﻳﺼﻌﺪ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻍ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ.
ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﺣﺪ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳎﺎﺭ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺭﺷﺢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﱀ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻓﻴﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳚﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻪ
ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﰲ ﻣﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻨﺎ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ
ﻣﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ .
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ
ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﳎﺎﻭﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﳛﺪﺛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻓﻬﻲ
ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﲤﺪﺩﻩ ﻭﺗﻐﲑ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ
ﳍﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﲤﺪﺩﹰﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻘﻄﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬ ﺍﺀ ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﻩ .ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺫ ﺍ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺍﺳﻌﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻟﻪ ﺛﻘﺐ
ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﺀ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺧﻠﻖ ﺃﻣﻌﺎﺅﻩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺑﺲ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ.
ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺗﻼﻓﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ:
ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻼ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻱ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺧﺮﺝ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻗﻞ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻝ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻴﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺍﺏ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻌﻤﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺤﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﺘﱪﺯ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﻜﺮ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺗ ﻼﻓﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻖ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﺒﺴﺒﺐ ﻗﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﺎﺻﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﻴﻂ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﻗﺮﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺢ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﲔ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻔﺘﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻟﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ
ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻘﺘﲔ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؟ ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺇﻻ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺳﺘﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ،ﺃﻥ ﺳﺘﺔ ﺃﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﻞ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺿﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ،ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ .ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﻫﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ .ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻣﻠﺘﻮ ﺁﺧﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ .ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻞ
ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﻓﻼ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﺮﺃﺳﻪ ﺇﺫ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﻛﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ .ﻭﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﻄﻮﻝ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ
ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺗﺄﺧﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺄﺧﺮ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺬﺍﰐ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻟﺒﺜﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺻﻔﺎﻭﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﺎﺗﺖ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ
ﻼ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻧﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲡﺎﻭﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ
ﺗﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺳﺖ ..ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﺰﺟﺔ ﳐﺎﻃﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺤﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺘﺔ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﹰﺎ .ﻭﲰﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﺑﺄﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ .ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﻊ ﺗﺴﻔﻠﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻴﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﻬﺗﺎ
ﻭﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﳍﺎﺿﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻬﻧﻀﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻻ ﺍﻻﻬﻧﻀﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻠﻮﺳﻲ.
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﻳﺘﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺑﻞ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﺎ
ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺅﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ
ﳏﻔﻮﻇﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ ﻭﳓﻮﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ
ﳛﻮﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻪ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ
ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺮﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﳌﺨﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳜﺘﺺ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﻟﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻟﻘﺼﺮﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﲞﻼﻑ ﻫﺬ ﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻻﳓﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺤﺪﺭﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺑﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﶈﺎﺫﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺑﺮ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ
ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﳑﺘﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺘﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺳﻊ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻭﻃﻮﻝ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ ﻗﺪ ﳚﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ
ﻭﳛﺘﺒﺲ ﺃﻳﺎﻣﹰﺎ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﳌﺎ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻳﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻞ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺳﻌﺘﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ .ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻭﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ
ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﻮﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺘﺺ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻻ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺍﳍﺎﺿﻤﺔ
ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﰒ
ﻳﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﻓﻠﻮ ﻧﻔﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻧﺎﺯ ﹰﻻ ﳋﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻭﺓ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻧﻔﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻗﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻘﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﻳﻌﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻧﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺗﻌﺪﻯ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻪ ﻟﻴﻄﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺃﺧﺬﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﹰﺎ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻻﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﺴﺮ ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﻒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﻻ ﳚﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﲢﺖ ﻣﺴﻠﻜﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ﻳﺴﻠﻚ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﹰﺎ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺤﺪﺭ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳓﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﱃ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﹰﺎ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﲡﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺍﳓﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻩ ﻟﺌﻼ ﳜﻠﻮ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺧﻠﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﳜﻠﻮ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻛﺨﻠﻮ ﺟﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﲝﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺮﺷﺢ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻠﺬﻋﻪ ﻳﺴﺮﻉ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﺎﺻﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ.
ﻓﻜﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﳋﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻘﺮﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺘﺼﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﳋﻠﻮ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ ﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻘﺎﺀﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻧﲔ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ً.ﻣﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﳋﻠﻮﻩ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻘﺮﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺘﺼﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﳋﻠﻮ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻓﺎﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ ﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻘﺎﺀﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻧﲔ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻸﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺘﻪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ .ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺩﻗﺎﻕ ﻷﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ
ﺳﻴﺎﻻﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ ﺗﺮﺷﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻭﳌﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻻﺛﲏ
ﻋﺸﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺺ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﻢ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻫﺬ ﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻖ ﻷﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﲰﹰﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﹰﺎ ﻓﺨﺼﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ
ﻟﻠﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﻠﺘﻒ ﻟﻴﻄﻮﻝ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻫﻀﻤﻪ ﻭﱂ ﺗﻜﻤﻞ ﺭﻗﺔ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ،
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻓﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻔﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺣﱴ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﻋﻤﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﺍﻋﻸﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻓﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻓﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ
ﻼ ﲟﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ
ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩﹰﺍ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻢ ،ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺘﺼ ﹰ
ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻛﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﻢ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﻔﻤﻪ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﰎ ﺍﻬﻧﻀﺎﻣﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ
ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﻘﻂ .ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻘﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﺷﺢ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺣﱴ
ﳛﺪﺙ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺗﻐﲑ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻪ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﰲ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺷﺢ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﺎﻧﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰒ ﻧﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﻳﺎﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ
ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻓﻴﻒ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﺮﻡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ
ﻼ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻗﺪ ﳜﻠﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺑﻘﻲ ﺛﻔ ﹰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﺮﺍﺯﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻭﲰﻲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻟﻨﺞ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ .ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﳎﺘﻤﻊ ﻗﺪ ﻏﻠﻆ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﰲ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﺟﺐ ﰲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺷﺪﺓ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻭﻋﺎﺀ ﻣﺘﺴﻊ ﻓﻴﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ
ﻣﻀﻴﻖ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳏﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﺸﺪﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﶈﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﻟﻨﺞ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﻗﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻘﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻟﻨﺞ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ
ﻭﺣﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﲡﻮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻜﻴﺲ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺳﻌﺘﻪ
ﻼ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻮﺭ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﺛﻔ ﹰ
ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻟﻴﻨﻀﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻗﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ.
ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ .ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﺻﱪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺪﺵ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺷﺤﻤﻲ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻓﻴﻘﻞ ﺗﻀﺮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﷲ
ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺳﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺳﻌﺔ ﻓﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺍﺑﺎﹰ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﺎﻃﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﺗﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ .ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻻ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺷﻌﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻟﻠﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻟﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ .ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ
ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻓﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﺗﲔ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ
ﺍﳌﺮﻱﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻋﲔ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﺑﲔ ﺑﺎﳉﻨﺲ ،ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻱ ﻭﳘﺎ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ
ﲡﺬﺏ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻬﺑﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﺛﲏ ﻋﺸﺮﻱ ،ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ
ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻟﻜﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﻨﺲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﹰﺎ ﻛﺒﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺇﺣﺪﺍﳘﺎ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﺔ،
ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﻢ ﲜﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺩﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺖ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻥ
ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺴﺎﻙ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳﺔ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺬﺏ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻟﻜﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ،
ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺬﻭﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﲡﺬﺏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﻴﻒ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﻊ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺎﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻳﺴﺮﻩ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳛﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺯﻭﺍﺋﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺖ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺑﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻳﺴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻳﺴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲢﺘﻬﺎ
ﲜﻤﻠﺘﻪ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺒﺪﻳﺔ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﳌﺺ
ﻭﺟﺬﺏ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻴﻈﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲜﻮﺍﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﻴﻖ ﺃﻗﻞ ﺣﺼﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺤﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼﺀ ﺍﻷﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭ ﺫﺍ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭ ﻟﻸﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻀﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﳎﺎﻭﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻟﻠﻜﺒﺪ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻀﻢ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ
ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻪ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻴﻼﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﺃﻳﺴﺮ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﻊ .ﻭﻻ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﺎ ﰲ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﻋﺴﺮ ﺍﻹﺟﺎﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﲣﻠﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻓﻌﺔ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﻫﻀﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺬﻭﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻀﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﺑﺬﻭﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﳎﺎﻭﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻗﺮﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺭﻗﺔ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ .ﻭ ﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﻀﻤﻪ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻀﻢ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﻗﻴﻘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺀ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻫﻀﻢ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﺇﲤﺎﻡ ﻫﻀﻤﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻐﻼﻅ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻛﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻗﺎﻕ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻔﻞ ﻳﺪﻭﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﻋﺎﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ
ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﲤﻜﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮﻕ .ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻠﻘﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺗﻨﻘﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻴﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﳏﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺅﻩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﰲ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻣﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﰎ ﻭﺃﻗﻮﻯ
ﻭﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺘﺮﻗﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﺣﺪ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺇﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻣﺬﻳﺒﺔ ﻟﻸﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﺡ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻠﻘﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ
ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﺦ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻃﺒﺦ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﺓ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺮﻗﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ
ﻭﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺫﺍﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﺡ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﱂ ﻳﻀﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﲢﻠﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺎﻟﻂ ﻏﺬﺍﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺃﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﲑ ﲢﻠﻞ
ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺼﺤﺐ ﻏﺬﺍﺀﻩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺮﻗﻴﻖ
ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻳﻔﻲ ﺑﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻮﻝ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻏﺬﺍﺅﻩ ﻭﺗﺮﻫﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺴﻘﺎﺀ ﳊﻤﻲ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻍ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﻏﺬﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﰲ
ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﻤﻴﺰ
ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﺘﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﺻﺎﱀ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳉﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺘﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺣﺪﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺍﳌﺘﲔ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﲤﻴﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﳒﺬﺍﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰﹰﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺪﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻫﻮ ﳎﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺳﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻳﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﺑﲔ ﳏﺪﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺪﺏ
ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ
ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺗﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳊﻤﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴ ﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﳏﺪﺏ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺣﺎﺭ ﳊﻤﻲ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳚﺬﺏ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻴﺘﻐﺬﻯ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻛﺜﻴﻒ ﺃﺭﺿﻲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﲡﺬﺑﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ.
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻪ :ﺃﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﺍﻷﺭﺿﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﻒ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻣﺎﺋﻲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻐﺬﻯ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﻣﺘﲔ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﲔ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺗﺼﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳌﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻞ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺷﺤﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻼ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲜﻤﻠﺔ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﺭﺧﻮ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻳﻐﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﱪﺩ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﻘﻞ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭ ﺃﺣﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺍﻋﺘﱪﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﺤﺎﻝ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﺭﺧﻮﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺧﻮﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮ ﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻟﻠﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﺭﺧﻮ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﻦ ﳊﻢ ﺻﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺓ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻳﺎﺑﺴﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﻭﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻳﻮﻃﻨﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ.
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﺐ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﻮ
ﺍﳌﺴﺨﻦ ﻭﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻢ ﻣﺮﻃﺐ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﱪﺩ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺤﻤﻲ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮ ﻧﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺨﻨﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻓﺨﻠﻖ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻭﺷﺤﻤﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﻃﺒﹰﺎ
ﻭﳎﻤﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﺪﻡ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﱳ ﻭﺷﺤﻤﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﱯ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮﻃﻴﺐ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻠﺠﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻼ
ﳜﻠﻮ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﺗﺼﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻓﺘﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ
ﺗﺴﺨﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺴﺨﲔ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﲔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻣﺴﺨﻦ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻭﻟﻠﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺈﺳﺨﺎﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻨﺼﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﰲ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﳋﻤﲑﺓ
ﻟﻠﻤﲏ ﻓﻴﺤﻴﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﻴﺎﹰ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﲏ
ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻟﻠﺜﻔﻞ ﻭﻋﺎ ًﺀ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺴﻬﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻳﺮﺗﻜﺰ ﻭﻳﺘﻤﺪﺩ
ﺃﻛﺜﺮ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺸﺮﺏ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺤﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻗﻮﻳﺔ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻄﻴﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺅﻩ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﻀﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻮﻝ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﻟﻪ ﻳﱪﺯ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻓﺄﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻰ ﻟﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺭﺩﻳﺌﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺬﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻠﻄﻒ
ﻼ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻼ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻓﺠﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻩ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳌﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﺃﻭ ﺍﻵﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﺣﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ
ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﱪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﻟﺬﻋﻪ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﺸﻘﺎﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻼﺀ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺗﺮﻛﺰﻩ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻈﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﲡﻮﻳﻒ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺴﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ
ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺼﺒﻴﹰﺎ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺛﺨﻨﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ
ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻻ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﺗﺮﻛﺰﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻼﺀ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﺜﻘﻠﻪ ﳝﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﳝﻨﻊ
ﺷﺪﺓ ﲤﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﳝﻨﻊ ﲤﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﲤﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﺇﱃ
ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﺜﺎ ﻧﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳉﻬﺘﲔ ﻗﻮﻳﺎﹰ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﻭﺭﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺘﲔ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ
ﻧﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﻟﺒﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ .ﻓﺄﻭﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﳘﺎ ﳜﺮﻗﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰒ ﳜﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻭﻳﻔﻀﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻣﺘﻸﺕ ﺣﱴ ﺿﻐﻄﺖ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻧﻀﻐﻂ ﺫﻧﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺍﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺘﲔ ﻓﺎﻧﺴﺪﺍ
ﻓﺎﻣﺘﻨﻊ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻣﺘﻨﻊ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ .ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ .ﻭﺍﷲ
ﻭﱄ ﺍ ﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺼﻞ ﺑﺮﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻸﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ
ﻭﺃﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺠﺠﻬﻢ ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳓﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳓﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﻧﺒﲔ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﳐﺘﺼﺮ ﻭﻧﺒﲔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ
ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﶈﻘﻖ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﻳﻦ.
ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﳏﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﻭﺭﺑﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﺑﻞ ﳊﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﺟﻠﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺼﺒﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ
ﺃﻭﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﺓ ﺑﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻼ ﻋﻈﻤﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ
ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻷﺟﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻋﺼﺒﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺑﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺏ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫ ﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﲔ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻟﻜﺮﻣﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻘﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻘﻪ ﻓﻴﻌﻄﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﺪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ.
ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﲎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﲎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻌﺪﻝ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺣﱴ ﺻﺎﺭ ﰲ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ
ﺍﻬﻧﻀﻢ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺣﱴ
ﻳﻨﻬﻀﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻓﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﶈﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﺜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻛﺎﻟﻄﻞ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻓﻠﻨﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺔ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﺔ
ﻟﻠﺴﻴﻼﻥ ،ﻭﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﲎ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﶈﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺎﺭ ﻓﻸﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﱂ
ﺗﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﻢ ﳛﺼﻞ ﳍﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳍﻀﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻊ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﲎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺜﻮﺛﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﻛﺎﻟﻄﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﳎﺮﻯ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ .ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ؟
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ
ﺗﻔﺎﺭﻗﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﺨﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﱪﺩ ﻭﻳﺘﻜﺎﺛﻒ ﻭﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﰒ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻳﻨﺰﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﺫﻧﲔ ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﰲ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻧﺰﻭﳍﺎ
ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺤﻔﻆ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻓﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺣﱴ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ
ﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﺻﺎﺩﻓﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺻﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﳑﻠﻮﺀﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻴﺘﲔ ﻭﻳﻌﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﺤﻴﻠﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﺽ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﻟﻪ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﺿﻪ ﻭﻧﻀﺠﻪ .ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻤﻞ ﻧﻀﺠﻪ
ﻭﺑﻴﺎﺿﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﻣﲎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﺯ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﲎ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﰲ
ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻀﻠﺔ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺅﻩ ﻣﺘﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﺤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﲎ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ
ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻛﺎﳌﲎ ﻗﻮﺓ ﻣﻮﻟﺪﺓ ﻭﻣﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ
ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ .ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻻ ﺧﻔﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻬﺎ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺍﳌﲎ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﺍﻷﻡ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﱪﺩ ﺑﺎﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﻡ
ﺍﳌﻤﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻫﻲ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ .ﻭﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻣﻦ
ﺻﺐ ﺍﳌﲎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻳﺸﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻭﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺑﺴﺒﺒﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺐ ﺍﳌﲎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﲎ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻮﻝ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﺭﺍﻕ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻼ
ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺬﺭ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻗﻀﻴﺐ ﻟﻪ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺐ ﺍﳌﲎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﳎﺎ ﹴﺭ :ﳎﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﻤﲎ ،ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻟﻠﻤﺬﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲎ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﲟﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ
ﻣﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻳﲔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻟﺌﻼ
ﻳﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﻭﻳﺘﺄﱂ ﲝﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺑﻠﺬﻋﻪ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺭ ﺣﺎﺭ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻟﻴﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻪ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺭ ﻳﺆﱂ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻭﻳﺆﺫﻳﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻟﻴﻨﻔﻌﻞ
ﻋﻦ ﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻴﻐﺮﺽ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﺆﱂ ﺃﳌﹰﺎ ﻣﺎ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻠﺘﺤﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﲟﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﻳﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺰﻭﺟﺔ ﻓﻴﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻔﺮﻕ ﻭﻋﻮﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻭﻋﻮﺩ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻟﺬﻳﺬﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﺬﻳﺬﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺇﺫ ﳚﺮﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﻨﺎﹰ ﻓﻬﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ
ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﻴﻖ ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺍﻟﻀﻴﻖ ﻋﺴﺮ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺑﻄﺊ ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻴﻨﺼﺐ ﰲ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﰲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﲑ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻳﻔﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺣﺒﺎﻝ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ
ﻭﻃﻮﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻭﻳﱪﺩﻩ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻕ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺴﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺘﻠﻴﻨﺔ ﺗﻠﻴﻨﹰﺎ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲢﺮﻳﻜﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺳﻴﻼﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﺘﻠﻴﲔ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ،ﻭﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﻴﻨﺔ ﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ،ﻭﻗﺒﻞ
ﻗﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺬﻱ .ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻼﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺪﺕ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﺪﺕ
ﺃﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﺟﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﺬﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ
ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﺗﻠﲔ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻼ ﳚﺲ ﺳﻴﻼﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ،
ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﳜﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪ ،ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ .ﻭﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻓﻮﻕ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ
ﺣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻠﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﺃﺯﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺘﻪ ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ
ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻱ ﻭﲢﺮﻛﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﺪﺕ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻀﻐﺎﻁ ﻏﺪﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﺬﻱ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺍﻧﻀﻐﺎﻃﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻳﲔ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﳑﺎ
ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺗﺄﱂ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻧﺴ ﺤﺎﺟﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﺴﻴﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﺘﻠﲔ ﳎﺮﺍﻩ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ
ﻣﻦ ﺭﻳﺎﺡ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻟﺘﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻌﺴﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﻱ ،ﻭﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ
ﳎﺮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻠﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﳍﺎ ﻻ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻀﺮ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺩﻱ ﰲ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺟﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺋﻪ ﻏﺪﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ
ﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺪﺓ ﻓﺴﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻪ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎﹰ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﳌﻌﻮﺟﺔ .ﻭﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﺞ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ؟
ﻭﺟﻮﺍﺑﻨﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳﺞ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻹﻃﺎﻟﺔ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ
ﲤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻓﺈﻥ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺒﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ
ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﲤﺪﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺣﲔ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻃﻮﻟﻪ .ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳﺞ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻃﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﺭﻳﺞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻟﻴﺘﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻟﻠﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ،ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺯ ﻳﺴﲑﹰﺍ ﻻ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻛﻔﻰ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺗﺘﺤﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻟﺒﻘﻲ ﻟﻪ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﲞﺎﺵ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻌﺮﺿﻪ ﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻳﱪﺯ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻭﳜﺘﻔﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺀ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﻳﺪﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺀ ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ
ﺍﳌﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻄﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺠﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺐ ﻭﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻭ ﰱ ﻟﻪ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻠﺒﻪ ﻭﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺃﻗﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﻘﺼﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺧﻠﻔﻪ ﻭﻗﺪﺍﻣﻪ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﺧﺘﻔﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻪ ﻭﺃﻋﺼﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺃﺭﺑﻄﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮ ﺃﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺡ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺩﻡ ﻛﺜﺮ ﺷﺮﻳﺎﱐ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﻻ ﲣﻠﻮ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﺎﱐ ﳍﺎ ﻭﻷﺟﻞ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺨﻦ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ .ﻭﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﻏﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﻥ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﻬﺘﻜﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﻓﻀﺎﺽ ﻭﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺍﻟﺪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﰲ ﺃﺳﻔﻠﻪ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻌﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﻐﺬﻭﻩ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ:
ﺃﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﻹﻣﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻐﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺗﺘﻢ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻀﻠﺔ
ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻡ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﻻ ﳜﺘﺺ ﺇﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﺪﻓﻌﺔ ﰲ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺁﺗﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻷﻥ
ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺄﰐ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻗﻮﻳﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻐﻂ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﺗﻮﻗﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻻ
ﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻟﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﻻ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺋﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺻﻠﺒﹰﺎ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺩﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻷﻧﻪ
ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺳﻄﺤﻴﻪ ﺃﺻﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺇﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﺨﻨﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺍﹰ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻏﲑ
ﳑﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ .ﻭﺇﻻ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﲔ:
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﲪﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺈﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻟﺜﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻼ ﻟﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﹰﺍ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﺑﺎﳌﲏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺑﺎﻹﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺓ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﳚﻒ ﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦﻼ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺪﺩ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ
ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﻨﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳚﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻤﻞ.
ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻌﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﹰﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﻨﺔ ﺣﱴ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﺯﺍﺣﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﱂ
ﻳﺘﻀﺮﺭ ﺑﺼﻼﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﻌﺎﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻠﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﲔ
ﻳﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻈﻢ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻳﻦ.
ﻭﺧﺎﻣﺴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﻈﻢ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻩ
ﻋﻈﻴﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻟﻴﺨﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﻭﻟﻴﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻭﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻘﺼﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺑﻘﺮﺏ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭﻻ ﺑﻄﻮﻳﻞ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻏﻼ ﰲ ﻣﺪﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻔﺴﺪ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻮﺡ ﻟﻠﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ
ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺑﺈﻳﻼﺝ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﺴﺎﻉ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻻﺩﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﻭﳓﻮﻩ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﻠﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﺤﻢ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺤﺮﻕ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﺓ ﲤﺪﺩﻩ ﻟﻴﺘﺴﻊ
ﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻟﻄﻔﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺁﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺳﻔﻞ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﳍﺎ ﺛﻔﻞ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﳋﻠﻘﺔ ﻣﺸﺎﻛﻠﺔ ﻵﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻠﺬﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻪ.
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺁﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﻖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳊﻴﺾ ،ﻭﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﺎﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﹰﺍ ﻣﻘﻠﻮﺑﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ.
ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﺼﻔﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﻴﺲ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻲﺀ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ .ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺘﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ
ﳏﺼﻮﺭﺗﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﻦ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻣﺪﻓﻮﻧﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻟﻮ ﱂ
ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﻹﺣﺒﺎﻝ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺒﺎﻝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻣﻊ ﺇ ﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ،
ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻴﻀﱵ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﳐﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻟﺒﻴﻀﱵ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﲟﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻟﺘﻌﺬﺭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻹﻧﺰﺍﻟﲔ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻣﲏ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﺑﺄﺩﱏ ﺷﻬﻮﺓ ﻭﳜﺮﺝ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﲏ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ،
ﻓﻠﻮﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻴﻀﱵ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻭﺑﺮﻭﺯﳘﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﻧﺰﺍﻟﻪ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺣﲔ ﺇﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ .ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻀﱵ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻭﺗﺴﺨﻨﻬﻤﺎ
ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﻧﺰﺍﳍﻦ ﻳﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻮﺍﰲ ﺇﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﰒ ﻳﻨﺜﲏ ﻫﺎﺑﻄﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﺮﺟﹰﺎ ﻣﺆﺭﺑﹰﺎ ﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻧﻀﺞ ﺍﳌﲏ ،ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺼﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺠﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻭﻻ ﲤﺎﻧﻌﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻮ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﲤﺎﻡ ﺇﻧﻀﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻳﺘﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻭﺑﻘﺎﺅﻩ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻧﻀﺞ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺔ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻄﻮﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺞ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﲔ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻔﺬﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﺍﺗﺼﻼ ﲟﺠﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ
ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻴﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻓﻴﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺗﲔ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺮﻧﲔ.
ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﲤﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺗﲔ ﻭﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﲏ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﰲ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺛﻘﺒﲔ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲔ ،ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺋﲔ ﻳﺘﺼﻼﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﲔ
ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﲎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﳝﻦ ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻷﻳﺴﺮ ،ﻭﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮﻯ ﻭﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻌﹰﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺟﻬﺘﻪ ﰒ ﻳﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻴﻔﻀﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ
ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺀﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻮﺟﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺋﺮﺓ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﳍﻦ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﳝﺘﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻦ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﱪﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎ
ﻓﺮﻭﺟﻬﻦ.
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﲔ ﳌﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻌﻮﺍﺟﻬﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﺮﺗﲔ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻻ
ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻂ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺕ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺴﻊ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻮﺍﺝ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎ ﻉ ﺇﺫﺍ ﲤﺪﺩ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ
ﻟﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲤﺪﺩ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻧﲔ ﻭﺍﳒﺬﺏ ﻃﺮﻓﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺬﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﺎﻧﺒﲔ ﻷﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳚﺬﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺗﺴﺎﻋﻪ ﻓﻴﺠﻮﺩ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻃﻮﳍﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺳﺖ ﺃﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺇﺻﺒﻌﹰﺎ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻻ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ،
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﻳﻄﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﺗﺮﻛﻪ .ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺰﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻦ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﺗﻘﺼﺮ.
ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻦ ﻳﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﳊﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻓﺒﻀﻴﻖ ﻭﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﳑﺎﻧﻌﺘﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻈﻦ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﻠﺐ.
ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻟﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻦ ﺗﻮﺟﺐ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻠﻴﲔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺃﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻔﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﻢ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺝ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ
ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻢ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻊ ﻗﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮﺍﻫﺎ
ﻓﻮﻕ ﳎﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺃﻱ ﻋﻨﻘﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻓﺘﻀﺎﺽ ﺍﳉﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺭﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺪ ﻓﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻖ ﰲ ﺯﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻐﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻀﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﺃﻋﲏ ﰲ ﻛﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﺲ ﻣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺴﻬﻞ
ﺍﳔﺮﺍﻗﻪ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﻹﻳﻼﺝ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺻﻔﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ .ﻭﺍﷲ ﻭﱄ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻓﻴﻖ.
ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺦ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﲪﺔ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﻠﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﲏ ...ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻟﺪ ﱂ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻡ.
ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺡ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﲢﻘﻘﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺼﻮﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻋﻴﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ،ﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺱ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﳏﺎﻝ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﰲ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ
ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻭﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﺨﻨﺖ ﺑﺈﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺗﻌﺬﺭ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭﻳﺔ،
ﻭﺇﻬﻧﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺮﺩﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺕ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﱂ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ
ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻨﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺪ ﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺼﻠﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻋﺪﻬﺗﺎ ﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳍﺎ
ﻭﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻟﻜﺮﻣﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻘﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻘﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠﻄﺎ ﻭﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﱐ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺰﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻴﲔ ﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ،ﻭﺣﺼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ.
ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﺰﺍﺝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺇﱃ ﻣﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺣﱴ ﺇﻧﻪ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ
ﺍﻻﺭﺗﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺯ ﻟﻠﺘﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﻟﻮ ﻻ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻄﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﻧﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺯ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ
ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﳌﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ .ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻻﻗﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺍﻟﺘﺬ ﺑﻪ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﺜﲑﹰﺍ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﲟﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﻓﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﲔ ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎﺀ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﺻﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺮﺩ ،ﻭﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺬﺍﺫ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻻ
ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺗﺄﱂ ﲟﺎ ﳛﺪﺛﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﲝﺪﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﻉ ،ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﺘﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﺬﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪﺓ
ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﱂ ﻓﻴﺸﺘﺎﻕ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﳌﺆﱂ ﻭﻣﲏ ﺍﳌﺮﺃﺓ ﺭﻃﺐ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻟﺪﻓﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﱂ ﻓﻴﻨﺠﺬﺏ ﺍﳌﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻬﺎ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳍﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﻳﺆﺩﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻄﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺎﺋﻊ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ .ﻭﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﹰﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺍﳌﻨﻴﲔ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺰﺍﺝ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﹰﺎ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻜﺎﻓﺆ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺮﻭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺐ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﳊﺼﻮﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ
ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﻟﻠﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻨﺘﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﻧﹰﺎ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﻴﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺑﺪﻧﹰﺎ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺎﹰ ،ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻴﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻏﲑ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻘﺒﺾ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﳍﺎ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ
ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻩ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ .ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﻭﺡ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺰﺝ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻭﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ .ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﺨﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺃﲞﺮﺓ ﻟﻄﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﲞﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻻ
ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺩﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻤﻞ ﻧﻀﺠﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﻠﻄﻔﺖ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﲣﺎﻟﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻧﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﻷﻡ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺭﻭﺣﹰﺎ .ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻳﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ
ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺮﻭﺡ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳏﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻴﻌﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺮﻛﺎ ﻣﻨﻴﲔ ﰲ ﻓﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﳘﺎ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌ ٍﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻮﻻ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳍﻤﺎ
ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺤﺼﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳍﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻳﻨﺤﺼﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﻮﻳﻒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﰎ ﺧﻠﻘﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻄﻦ.
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻠﺒﻪ ﺑﺘﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩﹰﺍ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻋﻀﻮ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﲤﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﲢﺪﺙ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﶈﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ .ﻭﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺼﲑ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺣﻴﹰﺎ ﻣﻐﺘﺬﻳﹰﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻛﹰﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ ﺣﱴ
ﳝﻜﻦ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻌﻀﻮ ﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﺭﻃﺐ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺣﺎﺭﺓ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﻳﺔ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ
ﻳﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﻀﻮ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﺐ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻪ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻥ ﲤﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺃﻗﺒﻞ
ﻟﻼﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲤﺎﻡ ﲣﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﰒ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻷﻡ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺫﻱ ﻟﻠﺒﺪﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻷﻡ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﳊﺪﺗﻪ ﻭﻳﺒﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻝ ﻭﻳﻨﺼﻠﺢ ﻣﺰﺍﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ،
ﻭﺭﲟﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺭﻃﺐ ﲞﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ .ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻻﻥ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﱵ
ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ .ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ.
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺴﻂ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﺣﺠﻤﻪ .ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﲏ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ،ﻭﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﺰﺝ ،ﻭﻛﻞ ﻟﺰﺝ ﻻﻗﻰ ﺳﻄﺤﹰﺎ ﺣﺎﺭﹰﺍ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﻢ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﻄﺢ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺳﺎﺧﻨﺔ ﻭﺿﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﻘﻀﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻷﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﻤﺚ ﻭﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﺪﻳﲔ ﻓﻴﺤﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﱭ
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺭﺩﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻟﻠﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻷﻬﻧﺎ
ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﺧﺸﻨﺔ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺘﺼﻖ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻴﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻔﺸﺶ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﳉﺮﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺳﻂ ﻟﻪ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺠﻤﻪ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﻨﺰﻝ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﳑﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ
ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺼﻘﺔ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻣﻼﺯﻣﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻓﺎﻣﺘﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺧﻴﻮﻃﹰﺎ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻷﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ
ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﻧﺰﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻧﻔﺬ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺗﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﳎﻮﻓﺔ ﻛﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﺻﻼﺕ ﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺷﺮﺍﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺗﺘﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻏﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﰲ
ﻛﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﻭﺗﺘﺤﺪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻓﺘﺼﲑ ﻋﺮﻗﹰﺎ ﻭﻭﺍﺣﺪﹰﺍ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺗﻌﺪﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﻤﲏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺴﺨﻦ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻳﺮﺑﻮ ﻭﻳﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ
ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻋﺮﻭﻗﹰﺎ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﳌﲏ
ﻷﺟﻞ ﻟﺰﻭﺟﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺗﻠﺘﺼﻖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻨﻌﻄﻔﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﲣﻠﻠﺖ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺿﻤﺮ
ﻭﺻﻐﺮ ﺣﺠﻤﻪ ﻋﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﺯ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲤﺪﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ
ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻏﲑ
ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻭﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻟﺼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻤﻌﻪ
ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻣﺘﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﻔﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﲣﻠﺨﻞ ﺣﱴ ﻻﻗﻰ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﻧﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻓ ﻼﻗﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ
ﺣﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﲢﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ ﻭﲨﻠﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ
ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ .ﻭﺳﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪ.ﻃﻒ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺨﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﻭﺍﺭﺗﻔﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ
ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻟﺼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﰒ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﱃ ﲡﻤﻌﻪ
ﻛﺮﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻣﺘﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻒ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﱴ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﻔﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺇﺫﺍ
ﺗﺴﺨﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﲣﻠﺨﻞ ﺣﱴ ﻻﻗﻰ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﻱ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ ﻧﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻮﻳﺔ ﻓﻼﻗﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ
ﺣﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﲢﻔﻆ ﺃﻭ ﺿﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ
ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﻳﻦ ﻭﲨﻠﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ
ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﻏﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ .ﻭﺳﻨﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺯﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﲢﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﳌﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺗﺴﺨﻨﻪ ﲝﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ .ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﻳﻨﺎﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ،
ﻭﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻲ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺟﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﺱ .ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻴﲔ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻷﺟﻞ
ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺋﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ .ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﻟﺪﺓ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﺩﺓ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺫﻳﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺔ
ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻴﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﱐ ﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺣﻴﻮﺍﱐ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ
ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﻭﺣﺪﺙ ﳍﺎ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻨﻀﺠﺔ ﻏﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺐ ﳍﺎ ﺯﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﻭﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﻳﺒﻴﺾ ﻟﻮ ﻧﻪ ﻭﻳﻐﻠﻆ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ
ﻏﻠﻈﹰﺎ ﻏﲑ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺑﺪﻳﺔ ﺭﻕ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻴﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭﻛﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻧﻔﺦ ﳝﺘﻸ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺡ
ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺦ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﱐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺦ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ،ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺭﻗﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﻠﺐ
ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ
ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺟﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺗﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ
ﻛﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﺗﻪ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺾ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻳﺘﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺃﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﻭﻧﺴﻴﻢ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﺍﻥ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻳﺘﺤﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺮﻕ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﺗﻪ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﺔ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﳛﻜﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺇﻥ ﺻﺢ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ ﻓﺎﳌﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺋﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ.
ﺃﻗﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻳﻨﺨﻠﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻗﻮﺓ ﲢﺪﺙ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺔ
ﻫﻲ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻣﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ .ﻭﻷﻬﻧﺎ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ﲡﺬﺏ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺬﻭﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻻ ﺑﺈﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﳍﺎ .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣﻘﻘﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ.
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺑﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻓﻀ ﹰ
ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻷﻡ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻼﺯﻡ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺏ ﺗﻘﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻻ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺇﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻵﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺇﻥ
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻣﺎﺩﺗﻪ.
ﻭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﺚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻳﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﺔ
ﲪﺮﺍﺀ ﺗﺸﺘﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺍ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻣﺎﹰ ،ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺣﺪ
ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺗﻜﻮ ﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﹰﺍ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻋﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ
ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺍﺀ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﻜﺜﲑ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ؟ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ :ﺇﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻜﻮﻧﹰﺎ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻋﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺻﻞ
ﺍﳌﲏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺖ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﺎﻍ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺗﺼﻌﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﲡﺬﻬﺑﺎ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﹰﺎ ﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ
ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﹰﺎ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻌﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ .ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﳏﺼﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺟﺮﺍﻡ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺼﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﺴﲑ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﲑ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻣﻨﺒﺜﺎﹰ ﰲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳐﺘﻠﻄﹰﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻟﻠﺤﺲ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮ ﺍﳌﲏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺟﻨﺴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﳌﺘﺒﺨﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﺨﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻗﺪﺭ ﳏﺴﻮﺱ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺠﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻄﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺘﻤﻴﺰ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑﻩ ﻭﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ
ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ
ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻧﻔﺨﺔ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ
ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺨﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﰎ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ
ﰲ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻣﺘﻘﺪﻣﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺍﺀ ﻳﺸﺘﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺎ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺎﺧﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﲑ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻛﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﻄﺖ ﺑﺘﺨﻠﺨﻞ ﺟﺮﻣﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﺅﻳﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﺃﺳﻬﻞ
ﻭﺃﻭﺿﺢ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺨﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﲑ ﲡﻮﻳﻔﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻠﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻊ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﰲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻗﺸﺮ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ ﺍﻷﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ
ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ .ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﺪﻭﺭﹰﺍ ﺃﲪﺮ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ
ﲢﺮﻙ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﺫﻛﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻣﲏ ﺳﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﺘﺔ ﺃﻳﺎﻡ ﻭﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺭﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﲪﺮ ﻣﺪﻭﺭ
ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺃﻱ ﻳﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﺃﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺿﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﲢﺮﻙ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺑﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ
ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﻞ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﻂ ﲣﻠﺨﻞ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﺃﺷﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﲏ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺐ
ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺿﻞ ﺃﺑﻘﺮﺍﻁ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻇﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﲑ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻣﺪﻭﺭﹰﺍ ﺃﲪﺮ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺮﻗﻴﻖ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﻟﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﲪﺮ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻓﻬﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﺃﺑﻄﺄ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﺜﻰ ﺃﺑﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻬﺎ ﺃﺑﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ،
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺎﺙ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ،ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﺄﺧﺮ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻭﺑﻠﻮﻏﻬﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﻭﺑﻠﻮﻏﻬﻦ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ
ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻗﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻬﻧﻢ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺭﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﺮ ﻳﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺮﻋﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺘﺠﻔﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﺭﺿﻴﺔ
ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻌﲔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺳﺮﻋﺘﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺪﺩ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺀ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﳑﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻘﺼﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ
ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺳﺮﻉ ﳕﻮﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺒﻴﺎﻥ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻕ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻋﻠﻘﺔ .ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻣﻮﻳﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳌﲏ
ﻳﺴﺘ ﺤﻴﻞ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻘﻮﻱ ﺍﳌﲏ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺘﻪ
ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﺎﻣﺔ ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﲪﺮﺗﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﺔ ﻭﻳﺼﺒﻎ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻓﻴﺼﲑ ﻛﺎﻟﺪﻡ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻷﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﻠﻮﻉ .ﻭﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻘﺒﻪ ﻭﻋﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻛﻔﻴﻪ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻛﺒﻴﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻔﻪ ﺑﲔ
ﺭﻛﺒﺘﻴﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺪﺍﻩ ﻭﺭﺟﻼﻩ ﻻﺻﻘﺔ ﺑﺄﺿﻼﻋﻪ ﻭﺑﻄﻨﻪ .ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﲢﻴﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ :ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ .ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﲏ .ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺣﺪﻭﺛﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺮﻙ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ،ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺍﻧﻔﺘﺢ .ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻔﺸﺖ
ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻪ ﻭﺗﻜﺎﺛﻒ ﺟﺮﻣﻪ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﺇﻳﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﻐﺘﺬﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﳛﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﺷﺮﺍﻳﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻘﺮ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ
ﺃﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺸﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺗﺪﱄ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻄﻮﻝ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺔ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻘﺎﺋﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﻓﺘﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻭﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻘﻴﺔ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀﻩ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﻼ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻟﻪ
ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻴﻨﹰﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻳﺴﻤﻰ ﺑﻼﺳﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﺎﻳﻔﻲ ﻭﻳﻨﺼﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ
ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻳﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺮﺗﻪ ﻭﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻟﺒﺸﺮﺗﻪ ﻳﺆﺫﻳﻬﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻖ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻟﻴﺤﻮﻝ ﺑﲔ
ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺑﺸﺮﺗﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻷﻥ ﺑﻮﻝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﺣﱴ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺿﺮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺸﺮﺓ
ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺗﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﺬﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻼ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺻﻐﺮﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻏﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺪﺓ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ
ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺑﺎﻷﻡ ﺍﻷﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﺤﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﻬﻮﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺳﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻔﺮﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﺤﻮﻡ ﻭﺛﻘﻞ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﺮﺏ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﻳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺛﺎﻥ ﻭﳘﺎ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍ ﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﲢﺪﺙ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳝﺘﺺ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ
ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻣﺘﺄﺧﺮﹰﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺷﻚ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺮﻕ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ
ﻟﻠﺒﺸﺮﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺪﻏﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﺮﺧﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺮﻡ ﳛﻮﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺮﻡ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺸﺎﺋﻴﹰﺎ
ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻊ ﻗﻮﺗﻪ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺰﺍﺣﻢ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻳﻀﻴﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻭﻱ ﻟﻠﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺭﺍﺑﻊ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺎﺟﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﻳﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺬﺍﻥ ﺍ ﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀﺍﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﲨﻠﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺗﻔﻴﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﺔ
ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻘﻄﺎﺕ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ.
ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺣﱴ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇﻧﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ
ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺻﺎﳊﹰﺎ ﺻﺎﻓﻴﹰﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﺍﺯ.
ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻮﻝ ﺍﶈﻮﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﳜﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﶈﻮﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺘﻤﻮﻩ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﰲ ﳎﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ،ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﰲ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻏﺘﺬﺍﺀ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﲎ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻓﺎﺣﺘﻴﺞ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﳑﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺒﺪﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺮﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﺧﻪ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻷﻡ ﻭﺻﲑﻭﺭﺗﻪ ﺩﻣﹰﺎ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ
ﺇﱃ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻛﺒﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻴﺼﻠﺤﻪ ﻭﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﹰﺎ ﲟﺰﺍﺝ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ
ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﲎ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﺐ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﲏ ﻋﻦ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳚﺪ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﹰﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺇﻧﻪ ﳐﻠﻮﻕ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻓﻠﺌﻦ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﺇﻧﻪ
ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺼﺢ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﲔ :ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ :ﺇﻥ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﰲ ﻏﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻟﻠﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻦ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺑﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﳑﺎ ﻻ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﻤﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﹰﺎ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡ
ﺇﱃ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺔ ﺑﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ.
ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﺅﻩ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺘﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﻯ ﻋﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﻷﻡ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ
ﺍﳋﻴﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲢﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺸﺒﺚ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻓﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲢﺘﻬﺎ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﺟﺪﺍﹰ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﻮﻱ
ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻔﺬ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻭﺃﺣﺪﺙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲡﻮﻳﻒ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﱃ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ .ﰒ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﲏ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻣﻦ
ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺛﻘﻮﺑﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ
ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻭﺇﺣﺪﺍﺛﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻮﺏ ﻭﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﰲ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻗﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ
ﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ :ﺇﻣﺎ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﳝﻨﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺧﺎﺻﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﳐﺎﻟﻄﺔ
ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﻔﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻗﺪﺭ
ﻛﺜﲑ ﻭﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺇﺧﺮﺍﺟﻪ ﻟﺌﻼ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺬﺍﺀ ﻭﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺴﻬﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﲨﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺣﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ
ﻭﻳﻔﺴﺪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﻷﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺴﻌﺔ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻬﻲ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻻ ﺗﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ
ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺻﻮﳍﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺋﻪ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ
ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺬ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺐ ﻷﻥ ﻗﻀﻴﺐ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺘﻌﺪﻯ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺘﺎﺝ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ
ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﱃ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﰲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﱵ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﻤﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ
ﻗﻞ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﳜﺸﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﲔ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻔﻲ
ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺜﺮ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻭﻣﻸ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺮﺳﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺧﻠﻄﻴﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﻌﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﻣﺎﺀ ﺻﺮﻓﹰﺎ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ
ﺍﳋﻠﻄﻴﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﺳﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻋﺮﺽ ﳍﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻘﻮﺓ ﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ
ﻼ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﻗﻴﹰﺎ ﻟﺒﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ .ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﻼ ﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﱂﺟﺪﹰﺍ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﺋﺪﺓ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬٍ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻓﻼ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺜﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹰ
ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺆﺫﻱ ﺑﺸﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻷﻥ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﲢﻠﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻓﺄﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻓﻼ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﹰﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻔﻲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺎﻡ
ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻧﻔﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﺒﺸﺮﺓ ﺃﺷﺪ ﺇﺿﺮﺍﺭﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﳍﺎ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺷﺤﺔ .ﺭﻗﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﻻ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳚﻤﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻷﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻃﻮﺑﺔ
ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﻮﻱ ﳛﺲ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﺘﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﻭﻱ ﳍﺎ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺃﺭﻕ ﺃﻏﺸﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻨﲔ ﻭﺃﻏﻠﻈﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺫﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﺘﲔ ﲢﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﺍﳌﺘﻠﻔﻔﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﳌﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﻷﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻪ ﲤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﻜﺜﺮﺗﻪ.
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻕ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﻭﻳﺘﺠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ .ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺩﺓ
ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎﻩ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﻩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺑﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭﻕ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻠﻨﺎﻩ .ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺗﺘﺸﺒﺚ
ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺑﻘﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﻢ ﰒ ﲤﺘﺪ ﻭﺗﻠﺘﻮﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﰒ ﳜﺮﻗﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﻕ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺩﺓ ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﻴﻢ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﲏ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺒﺜﺔ ﺑﺄﻓﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺮ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺼﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺸﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﻗﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﰒ ﻳﻨﻔﺬﺍﻥ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﺮﺓ
ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﰒ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﺨﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳝﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﲔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺖ
ﻣﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ.
ﻭﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ ﺣﺬﻓﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺃﺑﺴﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻭﻧﺴﺘﻘﺼﻲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻇﻪ ﻭﳓﻘﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﺳﻨﻌﻴﺪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺚ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺇﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﰲ ﻓﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻧﻌﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻳﻨﺨﺮﻕ
ﺑﻨﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻭﺡ ﻭﳓﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻏﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻮﺭ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺈﺭﺍﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﻳﻪ ﺳﻬﻮ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺠﺰﻩ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﷲ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ
ﺍﻟﻈﺎﳌﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﳉﺎﺣﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﺮﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﹰﺍ ﻛﺒﲑﹰﺍ .ﻛﻤﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﻨّﺔ ﻭﻧﺴﺄﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺴّﻼﻣﺔ ﰲ ﺩﻳﻨﻨﺎ.