9694_s24_ms_21
9694_s24_ms_21
9694_s24_ms_21
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2024 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
ANNOTATIONS
Not good enough. Use wherever such a judgment has been made.
Benefit of doubt.
In Qs 2 and 5 and in short questions where indicated, use to indicate that marks have
been capped because an essential element of the answer is absent.
Use when an element of an answer which would normally be credited cannot receive a
mark because of a rubric; e.g., in Q5 use when a type of argument element has
already been credited in the same strand of reasoning.
Use in answers when no other annotations have been used.
Use on blank pages.
There must be at least one annotation on each page of the answer booklet.
1(a) The parent has a vested interest to justify their decision by claiming that it 3
has been successful / to defend any policy which will reduce their son’s
behavioural problems [1]. They are biased in favour of their son [1]. They
have an ability to know (see, etc.) how their son spends his time [1], but not
whether his claims such as speaking Russian are true or not [1]. They appear
to lack expertise in teaching / in evaluating the conspiracy theories their son
encounters on the internet [1].
1(c) (Very) reliably [1]. Although* this government states very basic expectations 3
of parents [1], it neither specifies how those expectations should be met [1]
nor tests how successfully they are achieved [1].
* Award this mark only if “although” or the equivalent is stated.
2 8
1 mark for an explicit supported conclusion
Conclusion
Cap at 7 if conclusion is absent or implicit
To indicate ‘conclusion’.
Indicative content
2 but also why some people would believe they should not be allowed to do
so.
Source D shows disadvantages of homeschooling from the perspectives
of both parents
and children.
The reliability of this Source is strengthened by expertise and ability to
see but weakened by bias and perhaps vested interest.
Although Source E expresses strong support for homeschooling,
it shows that it can be dangerous.
Source A mentions several valid reasons why parents might not want their
children to attend school. By expressing reasons why parents who have
certain religious convictions might want to homeschool or unschool their
children, Source C unintentionally shows why they should not be allowed to
do so.
2
Source D gives several reasons why homeschooling might be a bad choice.
As a representative of a headteachers’ association, the author of this source
has expertise and good ability to see but is biased in favour of school-based
education and may have a vested interest to encourage parents to send their
children to school.
Overall, I think that all children should be compelled to attend school unless
their parents/carers can prove that they are providing another mode of
education which is at least as successful.
Significant omission
Paraphrase
In Q3(a), (c), and (d), if two answers are given, one of which is correct, award 1 mark.
In all parts of Q3, apply guidance relating to additional material only if it constitutes an additional
part of an answer or an alternative answer.
3(c) A reason [1] supporting the intermediate conclusion ‘They will therefore 2
underestimate the unpleasantness and inconvenience that those procedures
will cause to the patients [1].
4(a) The last sentence of the paragraph is an appeal to emotion (fear) [1]. 3
Although it is relevant, as it shows that the subject of the argument is
important [1], it does not support the specific conclusion any more than it
would support its opposite [1].
4(b) Both doctors and computer engineers have a vested interest to recommend 2
business from which they will earn money [1] and their recommendations are
made on the basis of specialist knowledge which is not available to the
general public / in both cases there is no realistic alternative to relying on
professional advice (except seeking a second opinion from another
professional) [1]. However, doctors are subject to long-established
professional codes of ethical practice, whereas computer engineers may not
be [1].
4(c) Benefitting from medical treatment is conflated with surviving for longer having 2
actually been ill [1]. This is a weakness in the reasoning because many
people would consider that being prevented from becoming ill is a benefit [1].
5 8
Reasons 2 marks for three or more reasons supporting conclusions
1 mark for one or two reasons supporting conclusions
Each component of a candidate response may score only once. Where there
is more than one possibility, use the classification which leads to the higher
total mark.
No credit for material unrelated to the claim given on the question paper.
No credit for material reproduced from the passage.
Use highlighter to indicate material which is not relevant to the stated claim
or is derived from the passage.
Some people may think it is a matter of personal choice how much effort they
put in to preserving their own health, but in fact maintaining physical and
mental health is the most important duty everyone owes to others as well as
to themselves. Health is the essential precondition for any worthwhile activity
– such as employment or charitable work – in which anyone might want to
engage. Everyone should want to contribute to the good of their community,
and they will not be able to do that if they are not healthy.
Therefore, everyone should give the highest priority to maintaining their own
health.
At the end of each person’s life, they need to know that they are leaving a
legacy of achievements behind them. It is impossible for anyone’s own health
to survive them, and so there are limits to how much time and effort anyone
should devote to maintaining their health. Giving priority to maintaining one’s
own health would be as pointless as cleaning a car and servicing its engine
but never using it to travel anywhere.
Some would argue that health is an essential precondition for any activity in
which anyone might want to engage, but this is not true in all cases. Some
people – such as the late Professor Stephen Hawking - have achieved great
feats despite enduring severe limitations to their health. So, maintaining one’s
health is not all-important.
Therefore, everyone should not give the highest priority to maintaining their
own health.