9084_s24_ms_21
9084_s24_ms_21
9084_s24_ms_21
LAW 9084/21
Paper 2 May/June 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2024 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
The marker should look at the work and then make a judgement about which level statement is the
best fit. In practice, work does not always match one level statement precisely so a judgement may
need to be made between two or more level statements.
Once a best-fit level statement has been identified, use the following guidance to decide on a specific
mark:
If the candidate’s work convincingly meets the level statement, award the highest mark.
If the candidate’s work adequately meets the level statement, award the most appropriate mark
in the middle of the range (where middle marks are available).
If the candidate’s work just meets the level statement, award the lowest mark.
Assessment objectives
AO3 Evaluation
Evaluate legal concepts, principles and rules.
Communicate legal argument coherently on the basis of evidence.
Annotation Use
NAQ Used when the answer or parts of the answer do not answer the question asked.
BOD Used when the benefit of the doubt is given in order to reward a response.
A Used to indicate AO2 Analysis and application in Q1 and AO2 Analysis in Q2(b)
and Q3(b).
SEEN Indicates that content has been recognised but not rewarded.
Section A
Table A
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response for Question 1(a), (b) and (c).
Description Description
3 8 marks
Analysis leading to a developed and
logical conclusion.
Application which is fully developed.
0 0 marks 0 marks
No creditable content No creditable content.
Indicative content
Responses may include:
Application:
Amanda assumes the rights of the owner by treating them as her own
when she takes them home and when she sells them.
Amanda does not commit an offence under s4(3) when she picks the
apples as the trees are wild.
Amanda meets s4(3) when she advertises the apples for sale.
Amanda also meets s4(3) when she sells the apples and gains £20.
Amanda meets s5(1) as Bob owns the forest.
AO1 2
AO2 8
Indicative content
Application:
Charles assumes the rights of the owner when he puts the money in his
pocket.
He treats the excess change as his own when he buys the magazine.
The money Priya gives Charles for shopping belongs to her under s5(1).
Charles meets s5(3) as he is obliged to use the £10 Priya gives him for
shopping and that is what he does.
A-G Ref (No 1 of 1983)(1985) suggests that Charles has a legal
obligation to return the excess change but he buys a magazine.
A-G Ref (No 1 0f 1983)(1985) also suggests that it is sufficient for
Charles just to keep the money-he does not need to spend any of it.
AO1 2
AO2 8
Indicative content
Application:
Maurice appropriates the £5 note as although he comes by it innocently
he assumes the rights of the owner and treats it as his own when he
spends it on his lunch.
Maurice also appropriates the coat and trousers as he assumes the rights
of the owner by taking them.
He meets s5(1) for the £5 note even though the owner is unknown.
He meets s5(1) in relation to the trousers as they are in the marked bin at
the back of the shop and so are still possessed by the charity shop as
suggested in Ricketts v Basildon Magistrates (2011).
Maurice meets s5(1) in relation to the coat as it has been left in the
charity shop doorway and so still belongs to the original owner.
Candidates can be credited for the argument that Maurice cannot establish
ownership of the £5 note as there is no one in sight and so he does not
appropriate property belonging to another.
Accept all valid responses.
AO1 2
AO2 8
Section B
Table B
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response for Question 2(b) and 3(b)
4 9–10 marks
Accurate and detailed
in most relevant areas.
Thorough knowledge
and understanding of
the most appropriate
legal concepts,
principles and rules,
key examples, cases
and/or statutory
authority, and legal
terminology.
EITHER
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
Handling of stolen goods is closely linked to other dishonesty-based
offences but because it can be committed in such a variety of ways it can
be seen as something of a catch-all offence; this can make it very
effective in extending liability.
As the offence is usually committed by someone receiving stolen goods
to use or to sell them it could be said to be effective as there will be less
thieves if the offence works well.
To be guilty of the offence of handling stolen goods, the defendant must
either know the goods are stolen or believe them to be stolen at the time
of handling and they will be taken to know this if the thief tells them that
which can make the law effective.
However, if the defendant doesn’t know for certain that the goods were
stolen, but there was no other reasonable conclusion in the
circumstances, the jury might assume they knew; this can make the law
less effective if juries don’t convict for lack of certainty or do convict when
the evidence is unclear.
Evidence that a defendant has been involved in or convicted of handling
stolen goods can be used to prove whether they knew or believed the
goods to be stolen; this is not normally admissible under the law of
evidence so it can be unfair to the accused and make the law ineffective.
Cases tried in Crown Court can be very complex for juries which can
impact on their decision making and the effectiveness of the law.
AO1 10
AO2 6
AO3 9
OR
Indicative content
AO1 10
AO2 6
AO3 9