SILO_BREAKTHROUGHS
SILO_BREAKTHROUGHS
SILO_BREAKTHROUGHS
The executive was frustrated. He frequently was mediating conflicts between his direct
reports. How was it that people responsible for large business units were unable to get
along? He did not have time to deal with their issues. Why wasn’t there more
cooperation and coordination among his direct reports? Maybe he needed to talk to
Human Resources about bringing in some “real” team players for his unit.
Working with managers, from front line supervisors to heads of business units, one will
find there are predictable patterns of disconnection between functional managers
across the organization. These patterns, identified by Barry Oshry (1994, 1995),
include: poor communications, duplication of work, internal competition, lack of
synergy, and shortsighted solutions. When there is a silo mentality it is thought to be a
function of a person or of the organizational structure. The real cause of this
dysfunction is systemic, predictable and fixable.
Middle Space
“I don’t see that it’s worth a lot of my energy to meet separately with my peers. They’re
not the ones that make things happen around here. I don’t trust some of them, with
others I have conflicts over goals, others are trying to look good, and the rest have
nothing to do with me getting my job done. I have so much on my plate, the last thing I
need is another meeting.”
The middle of an organization is often a painful place to live. By virtue of their position,
middles are pulled in many directions. It is difficult to please anyone. Their bosses
expect them to get certain results from their staffs. Their staff expects them to get
resources from the bosses. Customers, other departments, and productivity goals all
pull at them. Because middles are pulled apart from each other and dealing with their
own agendas, they do not see the value in getting together with other middles. Many
middles feel isolated. Without understanding or an intervention, alienation from one
another results. Alienation leads to competition, to judging one another or not trusting
one another.
The middle dis-integration is not because middles are inherently poor team players; it
is because middles don’t understand why they are alienated. And more importantly
they don’t see the value of integration. Even if they come to see the potential benefits of
integration, most find it difficult to start because of poor peer relationships or because
of their over-loaded calendars.
Middles and their failure to integrate is one of the great organization tragedies. They
have such potential power to positively impact a system. The system needs those in
the middle of an organization to share information, work information, solve common
problems, and support one another. Middles are uniquely positioned to deal with
common organization maladies - poor communication, poor coordination across silos
and frustrated change efforts. Yet it rarely happens.
Breaking through the silo boundaries is critical for organizational success. Ongoing
Silo Breakthrough Teams™ provide a powerful mechanism to bridge the white space in
organizations. These can be initiated by upper management, Human Resources or the
middles themselves.
Commit to meet over time. Organizations need ongoing middle integration. Meeting
periodically ensures learning translates into action. Also, it takes time to overcome the
effects of alienation. After several meetings, relationship and trust are strengthened;
then learning can occur.
Getting Results through Silo Breakthrough Teams™ Here are some examples of results
achieved by middles breaking through silos:
Thinking and acting systemically. The team of cross-functional middle managers had
spent the meeting addressing individual work challenges when they discovered a
common denominator in each of these challenges. The way they managed and
tracked customer files was broken. Up until this meeting, they were each trying to fix
aspects of this individually. But now they could see how the problem was systemic.
Instead of working the issue separately, they worked together to fix the process,
identified someone at a higher level who could sponsor their efforts and solved the
issue within 3 months. - - Insurance Team
Coordinating efforts. After 3 months in our new job, most of us wanted to quit. We each
had a different client base to serve. We were going crazy trying to address the
expectations of the clients and the expectations of the corporate office. Once we
began to meet and reflect regularly, we saw opportunities to divide and conquer. We
also used the time to coach each other about how to manage this difficult job. The
coaching and finding ways to avoid duplication freed us up to be more strategic. It is
hard blocking a day every few months to meet, but I DON’T have time NOT to meet. --
Human Resource Team
Becoming a better leader and coach. “I am now learning to ask a lot of questions to
help people come up with their own solutions rather than me giving them all the
answers. Often it even happens in the hallway now. When my employee asked me
what to do about his project, I asked him what he would do if he had to make a
decision tomorrow, told him to think about it overnight and get back to me in our one-
on-one meeting the next day. In the past I would have likely given him my answer,
rather than helping him learn to make tough decisions and helping my team stand on
their own two feet.” -- IT Director
References
Ginny Belden-Charles and Marcia Hyatt. Waterline Action Learning Handbook (St.
Paul, MN, Waterline Consulting, 2004).