Synthesis to Application
Synthesis to Application
Synthesis to Application
Unni Krishnan, Manjot Kaur, Kulwinder Singh, Manjeet Kumar, Akshay Kumar
PII: S0749-6036(18)32439-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2019.02.005
Reference: YSPMI 6026
Please cite this article as: U. Krishnan, M. Kaur, K. Singh, M. Kumar, A. Kumar, A synoptic review of
MoS2: Synthesis to applications, Superlattices and Microstructures (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.spmi.2019.02.005.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Contents
1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Bulk to Nano MoS2 ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4
PT
2.1 1T (tetragonal) .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
2.2 2H-MoS2 and 3R MoS2 .................................................................................................................................................................... 7
RI
3. Synthesis Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................... 9
3.1 Mechanical exfoliation ............................................................................................................................................................... 13
SC
3.2 Chemical exfoliation .................................................................................................................................................................. 13
3.3 Chemical vapor deposition/vapor-phase growth process (CVD) ............................................................................................... 15
U
4. Allotropes .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
AN
5. Properties ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 23
5.1 Electronic and electrical properties ............................................................................................................................................ 23
M
5.2 Optical properties ....................................................................................................................................................................... 25
5.3. Raman spectroscopy and phonon and photon interaction .......................................................................................................... 26
D
5.4 Mechanical properties ................................................................................................................................................................ 28
TE
6. Application ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 29
6.1 Mechanical ................................................................................................................................................................................. 33
EP
6.2 Bio sensors ................................................................................................................................................................................. 35
6.3 Gas sensing ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 37
C
PT
Advanced Functional Materials Laboratory, Department of Nanotechnology, Sri Guru Granth Sahib
World University, Fatehgarh Sahib-140 406 Punjab, India
RI
b
Department of Electrical Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, 406 772, South Korea
SC
Abstract: Molybdenum disulphide is established as multi-functional and multi-utility material due to
its capability to display varying properties as it transforms from bulk to nanoscale. It has strengthened
U
its importance in conventional industry in its bulk form as efficient lubricant. Its conversion from
AN
indirect to direct band gap with change of size has led to its usage as semiconductors in electronics
M
industry. Few prominent domains which have recently found its utility are in flexible electronics,
transparent transistor devices, and other co-opted fields for biological and chemical applications etc.
D
In this work, an attempt is made to compile and encapsulate all aspects related to material with a brief
TE
description of structure, synthesis, properties and applications, so as to provide useful information for
Keywords: MoS2; biosensors; hydrogen evolution reaction (HER); dry lubricants; catalysis.
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
1. Introduction
Development of materials with desired properties and characteristics has been a fundamental
challenge since decades. Nanotechnology has opened gates for tailoring the structure, shape of
PT
material at nano levels to achieve diversified properties. Tuning of chemical, electrical, optical and
electronic properties has ensured applications in major domains like mechanical, optoelectronic etc.
RI
During last decade carbon nanotube was seen as promising member for electronics [1,2] and other
varied fields [3,4]. However, it has inability to differentiate metallic and semiconducting phases
SC
evidently. This limitation has attracted intense research interest and evolution of quasi two
U
dimensional (Q2D) materials family consisting of graphene [5], hexagonal boron nitride [6], two-
AN
dimensional (2D) honeycomb silicon [7], layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) (including
molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) and tungsten disulphide (WS2)), black phosphorus [8], and 2D ZnO
M
[9] etc. Graphene was favourite due its extraordinary properties like high electrical conductivity (~104
Ω-1 cm-1) and high Young's modulus (1.1 TPa) [10,11]. Fermi surface of graphene is a junction of
D
valence band and conduction band, ensuring it to be a zero gap material [10]. Though it ensures
TE
excellent electrical property, its applications in logical circuits for low-power electronic switching is
hampered due to absence of direct band gap [12,13]. After graphene, TMDs [14] forming layered
EP
structure like disulphides, diselenides, ditellurides and fluorides of molybdenum, titanium, vanadium
and chromium have dominated the research filed [14,15]. TMDs possess transition metal from group
C
AC
IV to VI and chalcogens (S, Se and Te) [14]. TMD family has over 40 different combinations of
multilayered elements like black phosphorous [16] and quintuple layer of Se [17,18]. Material
characteristics and electronic properties of bulk TMDs depended on d-electrons of transition metal
atoms. Applications of TMDs in various domains are strongly influenced by their synthesis process.
Synthesis process like mechanical, chemical vapor deposition techniques etc. decide their field of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
application [19]. Molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) which is a prominent member of TMDs exhibits
this property seamlessly. It possess a layered structure, with an ability to transform from indirect
band gap of 1.2 eV to direct band gap of 1.9 eV [20,21]. In a monolayer form it exhibits a high
on/off current ratio (108) a decent mobility of 200 cm2(V-s)-1 at room temperature [22]. Thus
PT
properties depending on its thickness [22,23] makes it suitable for diverse applications specially in
RI
optoelectronics [24]. MoS2 is a layered material with molybdenum sandwiched between two sulfide
layers (S-Mo-S). Strong covalent bond exists between atoms within the crystal and weak Vander
SC
Waals forces exist within layers. This configuration defines its application as dry lubricants which
are used in aerospace machines [25,26]. Additionally, single layered MoS2 displayed properties,
U
which have marked variations from their parent bulk structures. Thus MoS2 was highly researched
AN
element; the number of papers published against MoS2 is shown in Figure 1 MoS2 gained popularity
as an replacement for graphene in electronics domain, further found applications in various sectors
M
like hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [27,28], energy storage & conversion [29–31] and as
D
electrodes in sodium [32] and lithium batteries [33]. The direct band gap and ability to produce
TE
oscillating piezoelectric voltage and current outputs guaranteed the application in flexible electronics
Bulk MoS2 crystal structure has a configuration of stacking Mo between six S atoms. It belongs to
class of TMDs which have three atoms thick layers. In them neighboring layers are connected by
weak Van der Waals forces which enable layers to slide one over other, facilitating shear along the
basal plane of crystals. This phenomenon at atomic dimensions which was achieved by ion beam has
been studied by Kim and Coworkers [37]. It was found that shear strength under normal load is 24.6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
MPa, thus exhibiting different mechanical properties and characteristics, giving birth to super-
lubricity.
Like TMD materials, it display rich polytypism [38] with three different polytypes format, namely
PT
1T [39,40], 2H [41,42] and 3R. The point group of 1T, 2H and 3R are D6d, D6h and C3v respectively.
Additionally, a hypothetical tetragonal 2T structure is also reported [43]. First digit indicates the
RI
number of layers and later alphabet defines crystallographic structure. In this ‘T’ denotes trigonal, ‘H’
SC
denotes hexagonal and ‘R’ indicates rhombohedral structure as shown in Figure 2. Further with a few
modifications in synthesis various morphology and allotropies like zero dimensional (nanoplatelets),
U
one dimensional (nanorods, nanowires) and two dimensional to demonstrate unique properties can be
AN
molded. 2D MoS2 which has largest applications is obtained as monolayers and multilayers to form
flower [44], dandelion, snowflakes . Natural and stable MoS2 is composed of 2H with less than 3% of
3R. It commonly has Trigonal prismatic coordination (D3h) of molybdenum atoms but with varied
D
stacking order.
TE
2.1 1T (tetragonal)
EP
displays metallic and paramagnetic behavior [45,46] with lattice parameters a = 5.60 Å, c = 5.99 Å
C
and an edge sharing octahedral. Great enthusiasm was reported in research of metastable phases of
AC
MoS2. Pathway for formation of final 1T phase consists of three intermediate superstructures/
metastable polymorphs. First one forms after 15 min of oxidation with an a X 2a superstructure and
second after 60 min of extended oxidation, which results in a metallic 2a x 2a with a d3 electronic
configuration. Further strong oxidation leads to formation of superstructure of a√3 X a√3 [45,47].
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
These three metastable polymorphs i.e. 1T’, 1T’’ and 1T’’’ are shown in Figure 3 [48]. Scanning
transmission electron microscopy (STEM) reveal that all three metastable phases can exists in a
single monolayer. 1T’ is formed due to dimerization of Mo atoms and the other two are formed due
to trimerization of Mo atoms [49]. Due to lower formation energy 1T’’ was reported to be more
PT
stable than the other two [50]. It is normally synthesized by hydration of MoS2 which was processed
RI
by intercalation compound Ki (H2O) y and then oxidized. Hydration and intercalation process supply
extra electron which helps in forming an octahedral structure. Later during oxidation these electrons
SC
are removed and octahedral form is retained with a distortion [45]. Another prominent method of
synthesis is by restacked MoS2 method [51] which involves precipitation of suspended intercalation –
U
MoS2(LixMoS2). The basic concept for stabilization is related to the amount of excess electrons
AN
available by doping, which is confirmed during Re-doping of nanotube [52,53].
M
This compound is stable for a few days and by just annealing or by ageing it transforms to more
stable form of 2H-MoS2, which is identified by exothermic peak. 1T-MoS2 undergo transition to
D
disordered 2-MoS2 at constant mass T 95 °C [45]. 1T-MoS2 has excellent application as source and
TE
drain electrodes [54] in filed effect transistor (FET) devices, which are made of 2H-MoS2
semiconductors [55]. Due to structural and electrical matching with base material (2H-MoS2), they
EP
provide low contact resistance (∼200 Ω µm) resulting in high efficiency and performance. For these
C
special applications, 1T-MoS2, is synthesized by electron beam process [53]. However, the most
AC
and does not accept foreign atoms, thus 1T polytype is a better option for intercalation. They can host
other materials and modify their characteristics, from n-type to p-type. M. Mortazavi et al. has
conducted intercalation experiments using Na and has reported that 1T-MoS2 was more stable
compared to its 2D version [56]. This phenomenon can be attributed to symmetry induced splitting,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
of Mo-4d of MoS2 [46,57]. Mo-d orbital of the D3h-MoS6 unit is fully occupied. Electron of
intercalation material is normally accommodated in 4dxy and 4d orbitals. 1T-MoS2 has
partially occupied 4dxy, 4dyz and 4dxz, which are of lowest energy, can accommodate electron from
PT
to 1T phase. Similar application as electrode in lithium ion battery is also reported [33,58]. Success
RI
of electrodes of 1T phase contacts can be understood from table 1.
Table 1 Comparison of device properties of FETs with 2H phase and 1T phase electrodes . [54]
SC
Property 1T phase contacts 2H phase contacts
Mobility (cm2/V s) 56 24
2H-MoS2 (lattice parameters a = 3.15 Å, c = 12.30 Å) is the most stable form of MoS2. Its Bravais
TE
lattice structure is hexagonal and space group of the crystal is P63/mmc. It is stable up to ~1203 °C
after which it converts to Mo2S3. It possesses an n-type of semiconductor property with a charge
EP
carrier capability of 100 cm2V-1s-1. It shows two prominent peaks at 1.9 eV (λ~ 640 nm) for A1 and
C
2.1 eV (λ~ 580 nm) for B1 exciton in UV-Vis spectrum. Similarly, Raman scattering has four
AC
characteristic vibration modes i.e. E2g2 mode (33 cm-1, weak), E1g mode (287 cm-1, weak), E12g mode
(383 cm-1, strong) and A1g mode (409 cm-1, strong). Two spin-antiparallel 4d electrons result in its
can be induced by alkali atoms intercalation [59] and ionic liquid gating [60]. It has been synthesized
by hydrothermal, ball milling method, chemical vapor deposition process to achieve 2D structures
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8
which has a paramount application. Though it has semiconducting features, it can be converted to
metallic when heated beyond 800 °C under high pressures. Further it converts from semiconducting
temperatures of 6.9 K [61]. It normally consists of 3R-MoS2 in very minute quantity in its stable
PT
state. In bulk form it is used as dry lubricants. 2D-MoS2 has profound application in removal of sulfur
RI
from organic compounds and fuel to achieve clean fuel via process called hydrodesulfurization.
3R-MoS2 is another stable form of MoS2 which is (found in less than 3% in natural
SC
molybdenite ore) rhombohedral –MoS2 with space group R3m and lattice parameters, a = 3.17Å, c =
18.38 Å. The unit cell contains three alternating S-Mo-S layers with a trigonal prismatic coordination
U
(D3h). 3R-polytype transforms into 2H-polytype upon heating. 3R MoS2 crystals exhibit excellent
AN
nonlinear optical properties due to broken inversion symmetry resulting prospective application in
ultra nonlinear optical devices [62]. Synthesis of single and multilayer 3R is done by mechanical
M
exfoliation technique [63]. 3R polytypes along with 2H are used as dry lubricants [64,65].
D
Further, differently stacked 3R-MoS2 polytype and 2H-MoS2 possess a similar density of states
TE
(DOS) [66]. One major difference between 3R-MoS2 and 2H-MoS2 is the band structure and UV-Vis
absorption spectrum. The basic differentiation being change in ionic coordination within interlayer in
EP
comparison to 2H-MoS2, is due to different stacking order. Thus, A1 and B1 exciton absorption peaks
C
Synthesis process involves conversion of MoOx- based precursor wires when exposed to H2S
atmosphere at a temperature above 800 °C. This would yield MoS2 ribbons which are predominantly
made of 3R-MoS2. 3R polytype shows valley polarization regardless of the number of layers, since it
Stacking has a prominent factor in deciding electronic band structure for bilayer MoS2. Wickman et
al. has described stacking order of different polytypes and theoretically proposed 112 possible
polytypes with less than seven layers [67]. Stacking sequence is layer dependent and would affect its
electronic property. Figure 4 illustrates various format of stocking layer for 2H and 3R phases in
PT
single-layer, bilayer and trilayer configuration [68]. Mo is eclipsed over S, having an inversion
RI
symmetry between two layers in the bilayer of MoS2 with 2H -phase. It has stacking sequence as AA’,
which has the least energy. 3R –phase with a bilayer has a stacking sequence of AB, with no inversion
SC
symmetry between layers. It is reported that a new stacking sequence, (AA’)B, with symmetry
breaking feature is considered as most stable configuration, which has immense application in
U
electronics and valley polarization studies [69].
AN
M
3. Synthesis methods
In this part of review, various methods of synthesis will be discussed along with
D
advantages/disadvantages and corresponding modification they incur. MoS2 has very rich diversity of
TE
structures and extends a wide range of properties. Various methods for MoS2 production are vapor
deposition, chemical synthesis, ultrasonication, hydrothermal synthesis, the sol-gel process, thermal
EP
decomposition, etc. Large scale synthesis is an important feature for success of any material. Large
C
scale monolayer crystals have been fabricated by exfoliation of bulk MoS2 via Li intercalation
AC
process. However, large-area film production is a major hurdle due to high synthesis temperature
(800 °C and above), which are later addressed by plasma-assisted synthesis. The various methods
assist in obtaining MoS2 particles with different shapes, sizes and spatial structures. These methods
10
PT
Method precursors Synthesis conditions Properties and applications Refer
RI
Hydrothermal-cum LiOH, ethylene glycol and MoS2 bulk Filtering by porous poly-vinylidene Uniform Large nanosheets of 4.68 nm
Intercalation crystals fluoride photovoltaic and photo- [70]
SC
Drying at 60 °C. electrochemical
Hydrothermal Sodium molybdate thioacetamide In autoclave at 200 °C for 24 h, Mesoporous MoS2 crystal lattice [71]
U
method deionized (DI) water centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min fringes were about 0.64 ± 0.05 nm
AN
dried at 60 °C for 10 h. electrochemical and super-capacitors
application
M
Ammonium molybdate ((NH4)6Mo7O24 In autoclave to 180 °C in an air oven Ultrathin nanosheets [72]
.4H2O) elemental sulfur (S) powders for 40 h. centrifuged at 10000 rpm photoluminescence, photocatalytic,
photodevice and photochemical
D
hydrazine monohydrate (N2H4 -H2O)
catalyst.
TE
Na2MoO4, NH2OH.HCl, Na2S, DI-water, In autoclave to 180 °C in an air oven Nanoparticles with diameter of 5–20 [73]
F-127 (H(OCH2CH2)100(OCH3CH-CH2)70 for 40 h. centrifuged at 10000 rpm nm, large-scale synthesis of
EP
(O–CH2CH2)120) flowerlike MoS2 hollow microspheres
Thermal MoO3 powder on quartz substrate, Sulfur Annealing at 750 °C to 830 °C for 1h Flakes of 5 to 50 nm thicknesses [74]
evaporation powder Argon environment / flow rate of fabrication of flexible electronic
C
Thermal Ammonium hepta-molybdate Ball milled for 1 hour in inert Co-promoted catalyst amorphous [75]
decomposition ((NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O) to ammonia and atmosphere MoS2 for HDS application
bubbling H2S
ammonium-tetrathiomolybdate
((NH4)2MoS4),
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
11
PT
(CH3CSNH2), sulfocarbamide (CSN2H4), Calcination at 700 °C for 6 h electrochemical intercalation
potassium sulfocyanide (KSCN), and
carbon disulfide (CS2)
RI
Rheological phase NH4)6Mo7O244H2O, sulfocarbamide Autoclave for 200 °C /24 hrs. MoS2 nanoflakes has better properties [33]
reaction method (CS(NH2)2), and oxalic acid Later calcined in a tube furnace at than their nano particles
SC
(H2C2O42H2O) 500 °C for 2 hrs under a flow of Lithium ion battery applications
argon gas. Promising anode material
U
Co-precipitation Ammonium hepta-molybdate tetra 150 °C on a hot plate with magnetic Continuous with diameter 20–150 [77]
method hydrate citric acid, distilled water under stirring for 30 min. nm, Rod-like MoS2 tunable
AN
magnetic stirring. Dried and calcinated at 250-800 °C, nanoelectronics, HDS and good
tribological characteristics
M
Ball–milled method Elemental molybdenum and sulfur Planetary ball milled at 400 rpm with Uniform MoS2 microspheres with an [78]
powders ethanol for 10 h average diameter of about 1 µm.
D
Tube furnace at 850 °C at a rate of Nanosheets of wall thickness 19−23
TE
EP 10 °C/min for 1 h in N2 atmosphere nm.
Ultrasound-assisted MoS2 powder chloroform, acetonitrile Pulsed ultrasonic irradiation Nanosheets 200 nm [79]
liquid method treatment for 1hr Exfoliated MoS2 6 nm to 12 nm.
Centrifuged for 3000 rpm for 30 min
C
Annealing MoS2 powders, Sulfur vapor Annealing in Sulfur vapor. Triangular monocrystals of MoS2& [80]
AC
12
PT
MoS2 n-butyl lithium for 48 h phased MoS2
Bulk crystalline MoS2 to Li+(MoS2)- Dried at 20 ºC and heated at 150 ºC / Photosensitive at 300-800 nm,
RI
Exfoliation- 2 hrs/vaccum. max photocurrent under
Restacking Method photoexcitation at ~ 440 nm. [82]
SC
Surface Na2MoO4.2H2O, stearic acid, DI water Filtered, washed with hot ethanol, 38.7% enhanced thermal conductivity [83]
modification with absolute alcohol at 80 °C. N2H4.H2O, and dried overnight in a vacuum at of MoS2 nanofluid.
U
stearic acid HCL and sodium sulfide 60 °C.
AN
Optimized solution- Bulk MoS2 Large-area flakes of thin layer MoS2 [84]
Ultrasonication and mild agitation,
based exfoliation acetonitrile as an aprotic solvent with average sizes of tens of microns
M
method and thicknesses as low as 10 nm.
pH-sensor, photoconductivity photo
D
illumination.
Redox reaction Ammonium molybdate Precursors are mixed along with HCl Nanorod with length of 50-150 nm [85]
TE
method ((NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O), and vigorously stirred. Mixer is kept and diameter of 20-40 nm,
sodium sulfide (Na2S.9H2O), at 90 °C for till black colour MoS2
hydrochloric acid and hydro-xylamine
EP
residual is formed. It is washed with
hydrochloride (NH2OHIHCl)
distilled water.
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
Novoselov et al. [86] was the first to synthesis few or single-layered graphene using Scotch tape
method. Some of the basic preferred qualities for this method are strong optical contrast between
substrate and flakes along with appreciable adhesive property. Silicon oxide [22,87–90] of
PT
thickness of 270-300 µm is the most successful substrate for MoS2. Only disadvantage of this
RI
procedure is low yield, however this is preferred by researchers as it produces MoS2 layers of
thickness ranging from few to tens of micrometers accurately. Another interesting and modified
SC
method which promises higher yield than the former method is wafer anodic bonding [91]. In
this bulk crystalline MoS2 is placed on a piece of Pyrex glass is made anodic and cathode is
U
given to back surface of Pyrex glass. Whole setup is subjected to a voltage of 200-1500 V at a
AN
temperature of 130-200 ºC, under these conditions adhesive tape is used to mechanically peel of
M
flakes to produce thin film on substrate. Monolayer crystals formed by exfoliation of bulk MoS2,
Existence of unique features of MoS2 has led to exploration and maturation of a novel kind of
techniques to synthesize the compound. The most striking being chemical exfoliation, as it has
C
overcome low yield problem present in mechanical exfoliation. It has brought in huge interest
AC
due to advancements in physics and material technology. There are two basic approaches,
foremost being the ion intercalation and latter is solvent-based exfoliation. Jensen et al. [92], was
the first to use ion intercalation method (also called Morrison method). This method consists of
two steps, first being introduction of small size ions, like lithium, is inserted into gaps of layers
of MoS2, widening and weakening it. As a second step this intercalation flakes are subjected to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
14
reaction with water, wherein ions react with water releasing hydrogen gas. This separates layers,
resulting in single sheet layers, which are suspended in solution. This procedure is improvised by
using solvents like methanol, ethanol and isopropyl alcohol, instead of water, along with slight
heating, for better results. Resultant products are called restacked MoS2. Few disadvantages of
PT
this procedure are the prolonged length of reaction time (3 days) and lack of control during
RI
intercalation process. Decreased intercalation process leads to low yield and higher level would
SC
semiconducting) into an 1T-MoS2 (octahedral , metallic) [93], which is not preferred form for
U
convert 1T to 2H-MoS2. Mild annealing can restore semiconducting phase of chemically
AN
exfoliated MoS2 crystals gradually. Further annealing above 300 °C is reported to exhibit band
gap photoluminescence [39]. Microwave assisted processes have been proposed to reduce
M
reaction time [94]. Additionally, microwave energy is also utilized as a strategy for preparation
D
Electrochemical method is another modified method in which instead of lithium in hexane for
intercalation, a voltaic cell is prepared using MoS2 as a cathode and lithium foil as anode. As this
EP
acts like a galvanic cell, measured amount of voltage and the discharge offered a better control
over complete intercalation process [93]. Solvent-based exfoliation is also known as Coleman
C
method [95]. Principle of reducing of energy for layer separation is followed, by mixing bulk
AC
crystal of MoS2 in organic solvents like iso propyl alcohol, N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) and
followed by sonication. This results in 2D layers of MoS2 flakes suspended in organic solution
which are useful for optical, vibrational and bio sensing applications. This method is also used to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
15
preserve 2H-MoS2 crystal structure [96] and these suspensions are particularly compatible with
PT
CVD synthesis process adopts a bottom-up approach, to control morphology, crystallinity and
defects. This method extends control of different process parameters so as to obtain high quality,
RI
high purity 2-D nanomaterial with controlled properties. This method facilitates development of
SC
novel types of 2-D nanosheets and their hybrids, by combining variety of precursors in different
forms.
U
CVD indicates development of thin films in large scale by chemical reaction of vapors over
AN
substrate. Figure 5 shows the schematic diagram of this method. Basic CVD method, is a direct
evaporation also called vapor solid growth method. It yields small flakes of less quantity but of
M
high quality as a single layer on a substrate. However, it suffered from discontinuous 2D-MoS2
D
films, contributing to development of vapor phase growth. In this, thin molybdenum layer of
TE
required length is formed on substrate and sulfur vapor is made to flow over it.
Numerous vapor chemical deposition methods have been developed for wafer scale growth,
EP
which resulted in large sided triangular morphologies of 2D MoS2 [74,98,99]. CVD methods
utilizes one of the three different types of precursors. First one being ammonium thiomolybdate
C
104], and third is elemental molybdenum [99,105]. When using first type of precursor the
compound is made to decompose during various annealing stages to produce MoS2 film. Crystal
grain sizes are dependent on type of substrates utilized for growth of MoS2 film. Larger crystal
sizes are formed while using sapphire substrate than by SiO2. FETs with n-type behavior are
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
16
fabricated by using MoS2. They had a field–effect mobility of 6 cm2/Vs along with an on/off
ratio of about ~10 5. It was reported that when graphene on Cu foil [100] was used as substrate in
an environment of argon gas, the resultant was a 2-5 nm grain size. Additionally, MoS2
PT
(NH4)2MoS4 was dip-coated [98] on an insulating substrate, it produces transferrable, high-
RI
crystalline three-layer MoS2.
SC
Balendhran et al. [74] developed a bulk synthesis methodology in which two step process is used
when second type of precursor (MoO3) is used. MoO3 is first evaporated on an arbitrary
U
substrate, followed by sulfidation process in a quartz tube. This two-step method is more
AN
preferred because of higher electron mobility. FET of n-type, produced by this method exhibited
an on/off ratio of ~104 along with field –effect mobility of 0.02 cm2/Vs. Various combinations of
M
temperatures and steps were experimented and reported to customize electronic property as per
need of FET devices and applications. It was reported that when process was conducted using
D
powdered MoS2 [106] instead of MoO3, it yielded MoS2 flakes having triangular shape with high
TE
crystallinity. Further MoCl5 and elemental sulfur were used as precursors to produce uniform
and high quality mono and bilayer MoS2 film of grain size ranging from micro to few
EP
nanometers [107].
C
While using third type of precursor, a thin layer of molybdenum film is made to absorb into SiO2
AC
substrate and sulfurized at high temperature in inert atmosphere [99,105] . Film formed by this
precursor was a function of area covered by molybdenum absorbed over substrate, process
temperature and type of substrate. Resultant reported by this were both n-type and p-type
behavior films of MoS2 with higher mobility ratios ranging from .004 cm2/Vs to .04 cm2/Vs with
grain sizes of 5 nm to 30 nm. This process effectively grows MoS2 atomic layers by coalescence
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
17
of triangularly shaped single crystals, which results in large scale and few-layered MoS2
displaying a high level of crystallinity. Few limitations reported in this method are lack of
pattern-ability due to random nucleation of precursor and scalability. Primary reason is attributed
to competition between lateral growth, which increases size of product and vertical growth,
PT
resulting in increased layers, especially under prolonged reaction.
RI
It was also reported that by using CVD process (by using second precursor) aligned edge –
SC
terminated vertically stacked MoS2 sheets were also formed, which finds a prominent place as
biosensor and catalyst, due to exposed active of MoS2 sheets. Similarly, nanosheets can easily be
U
doped and functionalized by introducing one additional precursor source in mixture. In contrast,
AN
tailoring atomic level properties, controlling stoichiometry and defects in 2-D materials will
require further optimizations, and remains significant challenge in growth of CVD. Synthesis
M
advantages like higher MoS2 active edges and more amount of surface area. Low yield and
D
random landing of 2D MoS2 flakes on substrates are problematic, especially for large-scale
TE
production.
EP
Unlike methods used for MoS2, slight modification and unconventional methods are adopted for
producing single layer MoS2 (SL-MoS2) or few layered. Few Prominent methods are thermal
C
annealing, and laser thinning method. In later method laser from a Raman system is used and
AC
made to systematically scan at higher power over thick flake of MoS2. Thermal annealing is
conducted in an inert argon environment, at 650 °C, on flakes causing sublimation. Another
method to modify exfoliation process is by ultrasound [108] which causes cavitation effect and
microjet effect. Cavitation causes bubbles at interface in a solvent and when they burst, they
Industrial production can be successful only if large scale production is economical and easy.
Conventionally MoS2 nanosheets are formed by CVD and later transferred to glass substrate and
patterned by photolithography [109]. It was reported to produce 500 x 500 µm2. However, this
method was plagued with losses during the transfer on to the glass. These losses are attributed to
PT
domain boundaries [110], transfer induced wrinkles and cervices [111] and reduction in back
RI
gate charging effects [112]. Further CVD operates in the 600-800 °C range but the formation of
MoS2 films requires 1000 °C, which is inappropriate for direct synthesis on device substrate.
SC
Plasma assisted synthesis process was established to have potential equivalent to CVD,
magnetron sputtering based synthesis [113] and atomic layer deposition (ALD) [114]. Synthesis
U
temperature of 400 °C was found to be sufficient for uniform growth of few layer MoS2 on
AN
substrates using MoO3 vapor phase combined with H2S plasma [115]. Better atomic and
electronic structured MoS2 are reported to be formed when metallic Mo films are used in
M
comparison to MoOx are utilized [116]. Plasma assisted synthesis at low temperatures are found
D
to be successful for industrial production explored for many materials like chalcogenides [117].
TE
It was reported that conversion efficiency into films, is a function of various plasma parameters
4. Allotropes
C
AC
their energies and properties, understanding of these basic allotropes along with synthesis is
inevitable. They are function of pressure, temperature of synthesis which determine the stability,
and chemical and electronic properties. Figure 6 shows nanoplatelet a zero-dimensional allotrope
H2S atmosphere [120]. This form of MoS2 has maximum reactive atoms at edges, which
augments its hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) , hydro-desulfurization (HDS) and catalytic
property [121,122] . It is a fragment of a MoS2 monolayer with regular triangular shape. Another
PT
morphology version, as hexagonal nanoplatelets, also exists with graphite crystal as support
RI
[123]. Symmetry of triangular nanoplatelets depends on symmetry of substrate as well six-fold
symmetry of bulk MoS2. Platelets have largest quantity of reactive atoms at the edges of S and
SC
Mo, which decides stability of structure. Stability of these allotropes (triangular or hexagonal) is
dependent on size, number of active edges and interplay of the edge reconstruction [124].
U
Platelet with Mo-terminated edges have lowest energies. The binding energies is directly
AN
proportional to cluster size till the bulk limit and is inversely proportional with number of Mo
One dimensional MoS2 allotropes consists of nanorods, nanoribbons (nanostripes) and nanowires
TE
of MoS2 having widths smaller than their lengths. A prominent process for production of
nanorods are redox reaction method using ammonium-molybdenite based precursor [85]. MoS2
EP
nanotubes are produced by MoOx based precursor wires. They are exposed to H2S atmosphere at
high temperature (500-800 °C) [125]. MoS2 nanorods are also reported to be fabricated by CVD
C
on SiO2/Si substrate. The growth of MoS2 is greatly affected by the concentration of the MoO3
AC
gas phase. MoS2 nanorods displayed excellent photo-luminance properties with an ability to tune
morphology of products [126]. Short tubular–like MoS2 can be synthesized by laser ablation
method, utilizing bulk MoS2 in argon atmosphere [127]. MoS2 nanotube with defective structure
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
20
on walls was reported along with high yield, when synthesised by thermal decomposition using
Based on lengthwise terminating edges, nanoribbons can be bifurcated as armchair and zigzag-
PT
nanoribbons. Armchair nanoribbon having semi conducting property has Mo or S atoms
terminating edges, while zigzag terminate displaying metallic behavior has repeated pairs of
RI
Mo/S [129,130] . Magnetic behavior of these polymorph is attributed to magnetic behavior at
SC
edges formed due to combination of sulfur vacancies in S-terminated or Mo- terminated
structure. Additionally, absorption of tertiary compound at edges will create additional magnetic
U
moments. This calls for magnetic property which is different from their parent unit.
AN
2H-phase like nanorods are dependent on set of nanostripes which are associated by the Vander
Waals forces. Electronic properties of these are evaluated by DFT calculations and the band
M
nanotori consisting of enlarged interlayer spaced nanosheets which led to superior properties of
TE
large discharge capacity (1488.1 mAhg-1) and cyclic performance. This hierarchical nanotori
provides large electrode/electrolyte contact interface making them apt in lithium ion batteries
EP
[131].
C
Nanotubes (NT) are another variant of one –dimensional polymorph based on folded, curved and
AC
closed fragments of MoS2 layers (single –layer nanotube is complex and forms nanowires with a
combination of 1T and 2H MoS2 forms). Figure 7 shows the basic construction of zigzag
simulated single-layer MoS2 nanotube and armchair simulated single-layer MoS2, viewed along
the tube axis (middle) and the c-axis (lower). These polymorphs are highly advantageous than
bulk due to activated surface of NT due to non-zero curvature. NT exposes free outer and inner
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
21
surfaces resulting in high specific areas and ability to store high strain energy. The bent tri-layer
does not promote creation of capped tube ends, hence inner volume is accessible while the edge
atoms are reactive [132]. Variants like capped nanotube, T-shaped nanotube and twisted
nanotube are also reported during investigation and experiments. Various synthesis processes
PT
like laser ablation from bulk MoS2, sonoelectrochemical synthesis and thermal decomposition
RI
are utilized for NT. MoS2 nanotube growth can be established by transformation of MoO3
nanobelts [125], sulfurization of Mo6S2I8 nanowires [133] and by heating of MoS2 powder at
SC
1300 °C in Mo environment [134]. Nanotubes are described by index pair (n, m) which
corresponds to circumference of tube. Other parameters like radius R uniquely determines tube
U
geometry. Helicoidal arrangement is determined by chiral angle θ. Three classes of internal
AN
structures can be formulated by combination of above parameters. With θ=30º, n = m we get
armchair nanotubes, when θ=0º n ≠ 0, m=0 we get zigzag nanotubes, and when 0º<θ<30º and n
M
≠m we get chiral nanotubes. Nanotubes are more favorable at higher layers, as same number of
D
layers (above K≈7 ) with an outer diameter of 12 nm , is more stable than equivalent number of
TE
linear layered structures. This happens due to dominance of strain energy in the nanotube with
less layers [135]. Further deviatoric elasticity elaborates the phenomenon of collapse of circle
EP
perimeter of nanotube leading to “∞-like perimeter, when a larger radii nanotube is synthesized
[136]. Stability of MoS2 nanotubes is studied by conventional classical theory of elasticity [137].
C
layers [138] . Stability was evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations, which establishes that
failure of nanotubes is abrupt, initiated by a single atomic defect , which propagates to entire
circumference [138]. Each polymorph exhibits different style of bandgap due to different
confinement effects and tailored tube diameters. Zigzag MNT exhibits small direct band gap and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
22
armchair MNTs, displays indirect band gap [139]. MoS2 nanotube has a marked advantage of
providing accessibility of inner volume and maintaining reactive atoms at edges, additionally it
provides high exposures and specific areas to outer and inner areas. These features results in
highly effective catalyst for methanation [140]. Theoretically it can be proved that the MoS2
PT
Nanotubes should inherit the properties of the metered structures, down to very small radius.
RI
They yield defect free structures with an only constrain of production of NT phase in large scale.
SC
Recently, three dimensional MoS2 nanostructures has attracted tremendous attention due to their
unique properties and potential applications. These are hollow, irregularly faceted shape similar
U
to nanotubes and composed of several nested shells and often addressed as onion-like particle.
AN
Monolayer which form shells are partially curved layers of 2H-MoS2 allotrope. High yield
includes electrodeposition and ultrasonic irradiation [141]. These IF-MoS2 are reported to be
sonoelectrochemical process [141], gas-phase reaction between H2S and MoO3-x [143], the solid-
TE
state reaction between MoO and high temperature reaction between MoO3 nanobelts and sulphur
[144]. The synthesised IF-MoS2 produced by these methods have superior performance, due to
EP
high surface area of 33.4 m2g-1, than the corresponding nanoflowers, nanotube [145] and
C
crystals. Thus they display excellent performance as catalysis, and hydrogen storage. They can
AC
also be produced by simple hydrothermal method [146]. It have immense application because of
excellent tribological properties and lubrication mechanism. Smaller size of inorganic fullerence
(IF) -MoS2, along with reduced agglomeration, allows them to enter more effectively in the gap
between rubbing surfaces, leading to less friction. This above concept depicts the IF-MoS2 to act
5. Properties
5.1 Electronic and electrical properties
After proving itself as an efficient lubricant, MoS2 was investigated for applications as
PT
transistors devices due to its special property of conversion of indirect to direct band gap as it
reached nano scale. Additionally this would result in increase in luminescence quantum yield
RI
(QY) [23]. This increased its dominance over graphene as semiconductor. It has required band
SC
gap to maintain the semiconductor properties of the materials. Greater control over electrical
properties is possible as the electron-free spaces, in between band gaps, allow certain electrons to
U
leap. Further, doping of MoS2 by intercalation has enabled it to maneuver itself both as n-type
AN
and p-type semiconductor as per doping element. Re doping modulated MoS2 into n- type [148–
The change in bandgap of MoS2, follows the following pattern (Figure 8) [155], which is
D
depended on quantum confinement, interlayer interactions and long range Coulomb effects and
TE
material physics.
• Initially in bulk MoS2 where numbers of layers are too high there is an indirect gap (1.29
EP
eV) between valence band maximum (VBM), at point г, to minimum point of conduction
• Conduction band Minima (CBM), value between the г and K keeps changing, as it is
• With further decrease, value VBM which is till now at г point, keeps decreasing and goes
below zero energy band making value at k which is unaffected, as new VBM point.
• In CBM value between г and K, keeps moving upward increasing gap thus making gap at
PT
K as direct and new bandgap (1.9 eV), displaying a semiconductor characteristic.
Further within nanostructures of MoS2 there is a slight change when it comes to different
RI
morphologies. MoS2 NT which is semiconducting has different band gap like direct, moderate
SC
direct and indirect band gap, depending on number of defect edges, so as to close NT [139].
Band structures are highly dependent on crystal structures along with thickness. Figure 9 shows
U
2H-MoS2 with completely filled d and empty dxy and d with a trigonal coordination
AN
resulting in semiconductor property. However these 4d2 orbitals of 1T- MoS2 are split into
configuration of d , d over dxy, dxz,dyz (t2g) orbitals. Metallic state of 1T- MoS2 is decided
M
transport properties with respect to charge and current mobility. For development of electronic
field theoretically density functional theory (DFT) is used along with local density
EP
in bulk is more as electrons have to move to conduction band and flow change direction in
AC
comparison to direct where there is no change in direction. This direct gap has also resulted in
enhancing photoluminescence (PL) property at monolayers level, of the tune of 104 as compared
to bulk form. Negligible QY along with weak phonon-assisted band-gap photoluminescence (PL)
is registered in bulk MoS2.. However increment in PL was registered as we move from few-layer
Unlike graphene, single layer MoS2 is non-centrosymmetric material. It has direct bandgap
which is attributed to role of d-electron orbitals. Additionally high current on-off ratio (108 )
good photoluminescence and efficient valley and spin control by optical helicity [158] are its
PT
merits. There is a marked difference between bulk and nanoscaled MoS2 optical gap. For single
RI
layer MoS2 reflectivity difference is a function of absorption constant [159]. Reflection
spectroscopy showed two peaks namely A1 and B1 at 670 nm and 627 nm respectively, where-in
SC
the energy difference exists due to splitting of VBM at K point. Split in the peaks for multi
layered MoS2 can be attributed to combination of spin-orbit coupling and interlayer coupling.
U
While single layer is due to spin-orbit coupling.
AN
In bulk MoS2, band gap photoluminescence (PL) is attributed to weak phonon assisted process
M
with least QY. PL was found to be inversely proportional to number of layers. PL are affected by
strain, modification to band structure and interlayer intercalation. Strain reduces the intensity
D
and energy of A1 excitation peak, which has different origins as per the number of layers. In
TE
single layer MoS2 there are six CBMs and VBMs which are called as “valleys” at K points.
These valleys are again split based on different spins. Normally single layered 2D-MoS2 has
EP
opposite spins at K and K` valleys in K space. Further because of time reversal symmetry single
C
layer MoS2 lacks inversion symmetry and does not allow inter-valley transition. Since, valley
AC
polarization requires the broken inversion symmetry and the spin orbit coupling, both single and
Trion is another unique feature of MoS2 as a semiconductor which has marked effect on intensity
(electron +hole combination) and an electron leading to formation of negative Trion. This
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
26
neutral exciton. Extra electrons formed get attached to the already existing exciton forming
negative trion. They are formed due to valley and spin polarized holes and have a large binding
energy (20 meV), which is formed at room temperature [160]. Negative conductivity in
PT
monolayer MoS2 can be attributed to trion formation. This happens because of many-body
RI
interactions inside material. This led to formation of charged trion from 2D electron gas [161].
They had heavier effective mass but same charge density. Trions have short life and with long
SC
transport channels and less mobility. However, it would assist in fabrication of miniaturised
devices and higher quality. Trions assist in control the excitons, its associated PL and spin
U
through an applied electric field. Thus, this distinct feature lays the foundation for excitonic and
AN
spintronic devices.
M
Phonon properties assists in extracting critical information like number of layers, strain in system
TE
and doping characteristics of any material. Subjecting MoS2 to IR scattering would result in two
modes (A2u and E1u) and E1g, E2g1, A1g, and E2g2 as four Raman-active modes [162,163]. Figure
EP
10 show the Raman scattering spectrum of 2H-MoS2 single crystal [164]. E2g1 represents
vibration due to two S atoms in-plane vibrating in opposite direction as per Mo between them,
C
while A1g mode represents opposite directions vibrations of out-of-plane S atoms. MoS2 forms
AC
two peaks prominently E2g1 has a value of 383 cm-1 for bulk and 385 cm-1 for monolayer and
A1g was found to be 408 cm-1 for bulk and 404 cm-1 for monolayer. As we progress from
monolayer to bulk, the E2g1 was reported to show anomalous stiffening, due to stronger dielectric
screening and long-range columbic interaction between the Mo atoms. E2g1 undergoes red shift
while A1g mode undergoes a blue shift in accordance with increase in number of layers (see
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
27
Figure 11(a)). This led to weakening of interlayer coupling. Thus, frequency of E2g1 mode
increases as the number of layers decreases while frequency of A1g mode decreases. The A1g
mode is less influenced by interlayer interactions but is a function of electron doping and
adsorbents on MoS2 surface. Additionally, A1g mode displays a red shift, due to stronger
PT
electron-phonon coupling occurs along with an increase in peak width with increasing doping
RI
levels. Number of layers can be related to change in frequency or frequency-shift difference,
SC
Further when more than one layer is present the shear modes (E2g2) and low-frequency interlayer
U
breathing (B2g2) can also be used to find layer number and evaluate structural properties of MoS2
AN
flakes with few-layer. Hence, increase in layer number leads to blue shift of shear mode (E2g2),
Peaks of Raman spectroscopy is a function of variables like temperature which causes the
D
quantifiable red shift of E2g1 and A1g and also direct proportionate bearing on the full width at
TE
half maximum (FWHM) values and intensity. Strain is another important variable, though A1g is
robust against tensile strain, E2g1 shows a red shift with increasing strain at low strain values with
EP
softened peaks. However, at higher strain there is a change in crystal symmetry and thus double
degeneracy of E2g1 vibration mode is lifted leading to splitting into two peaks. Further position of
C
each vibration mode of MoS2 from zero-strain reference mode, is dependent on the applied
AC
strain. Another factor effecting peaks is the substrate used for MoS2. Similarly, there are various
factors which affect Raman mode. All factors discussed above are of first order in which non-
zero momentum phonons (q=0) do not participate. When these non –zero phonons participate
then second order resonant process are observed, as electron and phonon dispersions are
involved. MoS2 monolayer, bilayer and few –layers when examined with laser energy of 632 nm
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
28
many new Raman phonon modes were observed. For multilayer MoS2 films, as the laser energy
Intensities of 2E2g1, E2g1,+A1g and 2A1g phonons modes were strengthened when a 325 nm
PT
ultraviolet laser was used, due to electron-two-phonon modes coupling. It was discovered that
RI
for monolayer several high energy bands in U-V frequency range have higher intensity peaks
than A1 and B1 exciton peaks. Few layer MoS2 displayed a stable, rapid and completely
SC
reversible photocurrent response under UV light illumination. These above facts substantiate the
application in nanodevices. This includes Young`s modulus, yield stress, bending modulus and
D
buckling phenomenon. Atomically thin MoS2 is a strong semiconducting material can withstand
TE
elastic deformations up to 25% before rupture [165–167]. Further it has good intrinsic bandgap
[168] and large Seebeck coefficient [169] , in comparison to graphene. Young`s modulus is
which is dependent on h. It is given by =
EP
experiments. Experiments for analysis of yield stress in single layered MoS2 is very limited,
AC
however nanoindentation experiments have evaluated yields stress as 16.5 to 15 Nm-1 [165,166].
Monolayer MoS2 has an in-plane stiffness of 180 ± 60 Nm–1. It exhibited an effective young’s
modulus compared to steel in the range of 270 ± 100 GPa. Average breaking strength was
reported as 15 ± 3 Nm–1 (23 GPa) and at an effective strain of 6 to 11% breaking occurs [165].
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29
Bending modulus of MoS2 is greater than graphene due to greater terms resisting the bending
motion, for example single layer of S atom represents 1.75 eV bending modulus It is calculated
by geometric method or by using thin shell theory using Stillinger-Weber (SW) potential and
was found to be 9.61 eV [170] . Bending modulus is calculated using formula below where-in W
PT
is bending energy density, k is bending curvature and ‘ ’ & ‘ ’ are geometrical parameters in
RI
the expression. Bending motion of single layered MoS2 will be counteracted by increasing cross-
plane interactions.
SC
= +
U
AN
Buckling under uniaxial compression is of paramount importance when being applied to
[171,172]. Euler buckling theory states that buckling strain is proportional to bending modulus to
D
in-plane stiffness ratio [173]. The buckling critical strain is dependent on length of the layer,
$.&
which is calculated by !" = −
TE
critical strain is independent of temperature beyond which it increases with temperature due to
EP
thermal assisted healing mechanism similar to carbon materials [174] . Buckling critical strain of
single layered MoS2 is twenty times larger than graphene making it better choice. Figure 12
C
shows relationship between the length and the critical strain for different initial strain load [175].
AC
6. Application
MoS2 has found applications in all primary fields like mechanical, electronics and co-opted fields
like photoelectric, electromechanical fields and biochemical fields. We have tried and review
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
30
most of applications for quick understanding along with reasoning. Figure 13 Shows domains
where MoS2 has excelled in performance. Researchers have combined MoS2 with other
successful material, to utilize their advantages to attain better applications. Table 3 shows the
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
31
PT
MoS2 Nanoflakes 50% Re-50% -- Stable distorted low onset HER with low [176]
alloyed with Mo tetragonal potential hydrogen adsorption
rhenium structure of 90 mV energies of
RI
(Re). Tafel slope 0.06 eV.
of 56 mV
SC
dec−1
U
d g-C3N4 ultrathin adsorption of about 100 sites, aligned degradation of
nanosheet nanosheets self-assembly nm energy levels organic pollutants
AN
composites with MoS2 process followed and efficient
by hydrothermal electron transfer
M
method.
Cobalt Covalent MoS2 shell Mo/Co ratio Vapor phase fiber core with HER and OER HER and OER Bi- [178]
Doping in MoS2 fiber network of 8:1 hydrothermal an external onset potentials functionality for
D
to Induce structure with optimal Co layer-structured as -0.02 and Water Splitting High
TE
fiber doping 1.45 V current densities at
diameters density of low HER and OER
between 1.62 over potentials
EP
40 and 60 nm
Graphite / graphite, ß- Ultrasonictation whisker ß-MnO2 Oxygen Reduction [179]
C
Fe@MoS2 2D-MoS2 MoS2 powder Solvothermal and Core-shell Efficient Microwave [180]
composite nanosheets zinc acetate heat treatment by structure . microwave absorption and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
32
PT
Quasi 0D/2D 0D/2D MoS2 powder liquid phase nanosheets have boosted [181]
ZnO/MoS2 ZnO/MoS2 zinc acetate ultrasonic a lateral size in interfacial charge
Nanocomposite dihydrate exfoliation the range of transfer, suppression
RI
(C4H10O6Zn), 100- of carrier
monoethanola 200 nm. recombination,
SC
mine ZnO NPs whose extended
size ranges from light absorption
5-10 nm. window
U
AN
MoS2 and PPy ultrathin scalable solution- Metallic nature high performance [182]
polypyrrole films on 2D based of 1T phase supercapacitor
(PPy) MoS 2 approach MoS2, mono electrodes.
M
composite monolayer layers, strong
interface
interaction
D
between PPy
TE
and
MoS2
.
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
33
6.1 Mechanical
The capability to demonstrate diversified properties by altering structure and number of layers
PT
ranging from lubricants to petrochemical industry, space machines and also as mechanical
resonates. Solid lubricants reduce friction between surfaces in many extreme environments
RI
including those with high and low temperature, high and low pressure, and high shaft speed
SC
where liquids and oils cannot be used. This is an attractive alternative to fluid lubricants for
minimizing friction and preventing seizing and galling, especially in high or low temperature
U
environments where fluids may freeze or vaporize. The application of molybdenum disulfide as a
AN
lubricant in its bulk form with a hexagonal layer lattice structure has been a great success due to
its low frictional and excellent adherence to many materials. Further, large spacing in lattice
M
structure with layered form of construction, weak vander waals bonding along with a good
D
thermal stability has increased its success rate as lubricants. These advantages of low friction can
TE
be attributed to sliding one layer over the other and due to six nonbonding electrons which
completely fill conduction band and confining them to structure, resulting a net positive charge
EP
on the surface of MoS2 layer. Miura et al. has reported that Amontons-Coulomb law would
friction, down to 0.003, was observed between two MoS2 surfaces [183]. On the study of
AC
tribological studies it was proved that nanolamellar [184] structure of MoS2 has maximum
advantage in this direction, which is depicted in Figure 14. MoS2 is most useful where metal to
metal contact exists in boundary lubrication regime, as MoS2 grease thickeners where high loads,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
34
low speeds, high temperatures and stop-start conditions exists. Major sectors where MoS2 is used
MoS2 is not reactive to most metals or acids other than hot and highly concentrated sulphuric and
PT
nitric acids. They are prone to change in lubrication property with increase in humidity,
RI
temperature beyond 400 °C (where it oxidizes to MoO3) and also due to smaller particle size as it
leads to increase in oxidation. Increase in oxidation has a considerable effect like increase in
SC
corrosion, increase in friction and lower shelf life and operating temperature of lubricant due to
splits disulphide decomposition. At 400 °C, molybdenum disulfide exhibits two characteristics;
U
significant instability and high coefficient of friction.
AN
In addition to profound applications of MoS2 grease to minimize friction it is also used as
M
nanofluids for efficient heat transfer. They are mixed in specific concentrations in various heat
transfer oils and gear oils to aid in friction and temperature reduction, at boundary lubrication
D
Solid nanoparticles were first introduced to nano fluids by Choi et al. [185] to improve its heat
EP
transfer and thermal characteristics of fluids. Modified ligand is effective to improve lipophilic
property of MoS2 nanoparticles [83]. Thermal conductivity measurements reveal that thermal
C
conductivity enhancement reaches up to 38.7% at a mass fraction of only 1.0% at 180 °C.
AC
However, this property decreases beyond 200 °C as it reaches the flash point of the organic base
oil we use, due to splitting of carbon bonds in base organic oils. Thermal conductivities have
been determined experimentally as a function of mass fraction and temperature and increases
accordingly.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
35
Thin two-dimensional crystals like graphene and other atomically layered structure were found
band gap, it is established as mechanical resonators [186] as mass and pressure sensors. Basic
PT
properties of large surface area and small masses and high Q-factor are main attributes for
RI
6.2 Bio sensors
SC
Unique features of MoS2 at monolayer form in domain of electrical, optical and vibration
characteristics along with a high surface to volume ratio has proven to be advantageous for
U
formulation of biosensors [187–189]. The high response and sensitivity of MoS2 which is found
AN
to be greater than 700 for a change of pH by one unit and signal to noise ratios is almost one
order of magnitude greater than graphene. These were few primary reasons for development of
M
more field effect biosensors based on MoS2 than from graphene. Development of biosensors
D
over the surface of MoS2. Prerequisite being morphology of MoS2 should be 2D format with
EP
large surface exposure and can accommodate a large capacity of chemical or bio species.
C
As explained before change in charge or mass over the surface of 2D MoS2, leading to an
AC
electron transfer, leads to transconductance changes [190] like change in threshold voltage in
FET devices. Additionally their ultra-response and ultra-sensitivity is also function of number of
layers of MoS2 , certain specific biospecies/chemicals and concentration which is concept behind
development of label free field effect biosensors for certain proteins DNA [191,192] and also as
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
36
pH sensors. When a top-gated 2D MoS2 FET is immersed in an electrolyte, which can behave as
a top gate electrode, the surface of gate oxide is naturally decorated with OH moieties. Therefore
protonation (low pH) or deprotonation (high pH) changes surface potential of the gate oxide,
PT
resembling gate effect leading to development of label-free sensor for pH. When target flows
over 2D MoS2, change in current occurs due to charge transfer from target to MoS2 layer with a
RI
change in Fermi level thus forming gas sensor. When same 2D MoS2 is used as electrode in a
SC
solution to judge a change in concentration with respect to current ratio/bandgap/charge
transport, it is called electrode bio sensor. On similar lines it is also compared by a reference
U
electrode like noble metal to compare changes. 2D MoS2 flakes have affinity towards single
AN
stranded DNA (SS-DNA) than to a double stranded DNA. When a complementary strand is used
to bring out dye, leaving behind the SS-DNA would lead to a development of Fluorescence
M
When target biomaterials immobilize on 2D MoS2 surface then interaction takes place and would
TE
call upon change in PL state and energy state thus forming optical based biosensors. These PL
changes are associated with electronic energy transfer (EET) and resonance energy transfer
EP
(RET) phenomenon [193,194]. Surface roughness and permittivity are few primary influential
Plasmonic of highly doped 2D MoS2 flakes can be used for biosensing. In these sensors doping
is a critical issue, they decide the adhesion of biomaterials on to 2D flakes. Further they change
PT
There are also various biosensors being engineered utilizing composites of MoS2, which are
RI
formed in combination with inorganic compounds like graphene, carbon nanotubes, and various
other polymers. With composites in addition to edges and properties of MoS2, another member
SC
called heterojunctions/junction effects comes into action which has profound effect on the
U
AN
Intercalation of few biological ions can reduce bandgap of 2D MoS2, leading to a quench to PL
at different levels. Only precondition for these types of sensors are they have to be engineered
M
accurately for specific ions and concentration, additionally an external electrical field which is
required for intercalation process has to be accurate as voltage across the bilipid membrane of
D
Junction formed by substrate and MoS2 does sensing using MoS2. One such sensing
component other than electrochemical [195] and biomolecular sensors are gas sensors. MoS2 are
C
being used for sensing NO2 [196], ammonia and H2 [197] and many other toxic and non-toxic
AC
gases. Further basing on same principle pH level detectors are also being designed. Exposure of
junction of the target material will bring on electrical conductivity changes, the sensitivity can be
as low as 1.2 ppm, which can produce high signal to noise ratio. This is further enhanced by the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
38
gate effect or light illumination. In this, exposure time and the number of layers provides good
chance, since thicker layers define greater charge concentration and higher on/off ratio.
PT
MoS2 has same basic chemical property in bulk and nano stage. Due to change in energy levels
RI
and availability of electrons at nano forms, MoS2 performs as good catalysis agent for
hydrodesulfurization, hydrogen evolution reactions and also as gas sensors. Special applicability
SC
was monitored when property change in 2D MoS2, with respect to electron availability and edges
of structure with sulfur, lead to development of gas sensors when utilized along with FET
U
devices. Adsorption of various moieties on 2D MoS2 often changes its properties as well as
AN
properties of target molecules. Detection of such changes open up possibility of developing 2D
MoS2 based sensors. It is highly influenced by size and temperature of synthesis as this opens up
M
active edges for catalysis process. Unsupported MoS2 is also an important catalyst in heavy oil
D
hydrocracking.
TE
High levels of catalyst dispersion, and hence activity, can usually be achieved by introducing
water- or oil-soluble catalyst precursors to feed that decompose and form active metal sulfide in
EP
situ [12].
C
Environmental protection and emission control policy has made super –low sulfur gasoline and
AC
mandatory activity, for which metal sulfides [198] have received appreciable attention in recent
decade. This is achieved by two methods; first involves removal of sulfur by designing catalysts
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
39
for hydrodesulphurization [199–201]of high efficiency and later is to improve sulfur tolerance of
It is highly influenced by size and temperature of synthesis as this opens up active edges for
PT
catalysis process. Higher synthesis temperature would increase crystal growth and alter size and
RI
distribution, along with its Mo and active sites distribution. As crystal size of MoS2 is very small,
numerous Mo atoms are on lattice fringe producing lot of heavy sulfur vacancies creating a
SC
highly appropriate climate for catalytic hydrogenation process [203]. It was also proven in many
studies that concentration of reactants and pH values also influence microcrystal structure which
U
effect morphology and surface area of MoS2 laying marked impact on number of surface defects
AN
and active sites. Microcrystal nanowires stack of MoS2 with an average length of 30-40 nm,
diameter of 2-3 nm and stack number less than 8 have high degree of active sites (depending on
M
diesel oil [204]. However, increasing hydrothermal temperature beyond a limit leads to
TE
formation of micro-porosity making surface area of MoS2 very low. Sulfur and sulfur containing
species has to be removed from oil at refineries to meet environmental regulations [205]. MoS2
EP
and few of its composites acts like hydrodesulfurization reaction (HDR) catalysis due to its
active sites [206]. In few occasions HDR has to be tailored as per the fuel specifications, as in
C
few cases Mo-edge active sites are recommended than active S site [207]. Figure 15 shows
AC
different Mo and S edged MoS2. Water or oil soluble precursors to feed, had an important role in
catalyst dispersion and rate of activity [208]. molybdenum naphthenate (MoNaph) derived MoS2
catalyst is reported to provide higher hydrogenation and HDN activity. However is showed lower
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
40
HDS in comparison to exfoliated MoS2 [209]. It was reported that 3.5 fold increase of activity by
exfoliated MoS2 compared to crystalline MoS2 due to increase in active edge sites [209].
PT
RI
MoS2 had immense application in chemical industry. Theoretical [210] analysis and later by
experimental [211] results confirmed the credit of HER capability to active edges of MoS2
SC
planes. Hydrogen is considered as the next clean fuel to replace petrochemical and other fuel
sources. It is an efficient carrier which provides high combustion heat and displays high
U
chemical stability in acid environment after certain modification [212]. Thus, this domain
AN
generated considerable demand for exploration. Production of hydrogen is done in two modes by
Earlier MoS2 was favorite material due to its inertness to strong material, which is prominent
D
feature of electrolyte. However, it was not persuaded further for research, as bulk form MoS2
TE
exposes mostly closed planes of 3-fold coordinated sulfur atoms to electrolyte. To resolve the
disadvantage, research increased towards enhancement of active sites of MoS2. There were two
EP
In former method where only Mo was active sties, few modifications like doping were
conducted with Co that can lower the hydrogen binding energy at the sulfur thus making both
the Mo and S edge site more active. Another method to achieve same output is to make MoS2 in
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
41
1T-MoS2 form (metallic), as sulfur planes are inactive in 2D-MoS2 form (semiconducting).
current. MoS2 nanotubes is reported to have ability to store large quantity of hydrogen (up to
PT
1.2 Wt%) by gaseous form and electrochemical storage [213,214].
RI
It was reported that MoS2 has strong photocatalyst properties, which is used in identifying and
removal of the dyes of textile industry. In this the external light sources excite the electrons and
SC
shift them from the valance band to the conduction band and then to the target molecule for
transformation. Degradation of methylene blue is an apt example [215]. Various MoS2 based
U
nanocomposites are also fabricated for better photocatalytic behaviour [216–219].
AN
6.6 Optoelectronic devices
M
Good mechanical properties, like the high stiffness and breaking stress, along with the unique
optoelectronic properties makes 2D-MoS2 as most promising and suitable material for flexible
D
electronics. Only the substrate, has to be investigated more in addition to already existing
TE
polyimide. Stability in air, tunable doping, low thermal effects and manufacturing cost are few
hindrances. Epoxy based photoresist (SU8) is used as non-degenerate n-doping and integrated
EP
with flexible MoS2 as encapsulation layer for promising results [220]. Electroluminescence is
C
another fundamental feature due to direct bandgap in MoS2 semiconductors, which has
AC
prominent application for light emitting devices. In these devices, electroluminescence is created
without the formation of p-n junction but by using the excitons. These excitons are created when
highly excited electrons are injected into the conduction band of the material through the
2D-MoS2 has an application in the photovoltaic cell as an active layer in hetro-junction solar cell
with different substrates like the Al, Si and Ag. It is reported to have attained an efficiency of
5.23% [221]. MoS2 has also proved to have power conversion efficiency of 8.11% when directly
PT
in photovoltaic cell operation. This can be attributed to its band structure, chemical stability and
dangling bonds. Recently, MoS2 based nanocomposites are utilized as counter electrode in dye-
RI
sensitized solar cells, achieving energy conversion efficiency of 3.69% [222]. MoS2 forming
SC
hybrid phototransistor in collaboration with other materials is deemed to open new
U
nanosheets and quantum dots of MoS2 has led to development of phototransistor rendering
AN
photovoltaic efficiency of 3.03% [223].
Additionally, due to direct bandgap properties, MoS2 shows a special property known as
M
photothermoelectrical effect. If illumination light of lower energy than the direct bandgap is
D
incident at the junction of the electrode and the 2D single layer MoS2, then unlike other
TE
semiconductors, there is a photocurrent which flows at the junction due to mismatch between the
seeback coefficients. This is called photothermoelectrical effect. It does not follow the
EP
phenomenon of exciton separation across the Schottky barriers at interface. The seeback
coefficient for SLMoS2 is tuned to -4 x 102 and -1 x 105 µVK-1 [169]. Further theoretical study
C
has proved that SLMoS2 shows photothermoelectric properties due to broken inversion
AC
6.7 Supercapacitors
Porous morphology of MoS2 enhances electrochemical performance due to large contact area
between active materials and electrolyte with fast ion/electron transfer. Elevated qualities like
PT
high-rate charge carrying capability and long cycling life are expected from MoS2 nanostructure-
based capacitors. Capacitors with mesoporous MoS2 electrodes exhibited an enhanced specific
RI
capacitance of 376 to 403 F g-1 at a scan rate of 1 mV S-1 with an excellent long term cycling
SC
stability of retaining 80% of charge even after 2000 cycles [71]. This feature is attributed to two
mechanisms. One is pseudocapacitive behaviour due to Faradaic charge transfer process. Second
U
is non-Faradaic process happening at the electrode/electrolyte interface, forming double layer.
AN
Further it is opined as an pure surface phenomenon [225].
M
After graphene, MoS2 is considered as an interesting element for investigation by researches due
TE
to its applications in multiple domains and change of property with transformation from bulk to
nano scale. The review provides a comprehensive appreciation of the MoS2 on lines its structure
EP
and phases, along-with discussion on various synthesis methods, properties and applications in
various fields. The review is basically formulated as a capsule information, to the ab-initio level
C
researcher to comprehend all the important aspects before he takes up the further investigation.
AC
Emphasis is placed for its role in hydrogen production and hydrodesulfurization process which is
of paramount importance for environmental safety. An overview of few specialist areas like the
vibrational and optical property of the MoS2 and its related applications in various domains were
also discussed. Significantly, some future prospects for use of MoS2-based nanocomposites are
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
44
also talked about. Though the element has huge potential applications, it has large number of
inherent hurdles like the large-scale production of high quality continuous and single layered
MoS2. Actual application and trials in biomedicines are still proven only at laboratory levels.
PT
Heterojunctions and heterostructures are still under investigations which requires much further
RI
8. References
SC
[1] M.F.L. De Volder, S.H. Tawfick, R.H. Baughman, A.J. Hart, Carbon Nanotubes: Present
and Future Commercial Applications, Science. 339 (2013) 535-539. doi:
10.1126/science.1222453.
U
[2] E. Frackowiak, F. Béguin, Carbon materials for the electrochemical storage of energy in
capacitors, Carbon N. Y. 39 (2001) 937–950. doi:10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00183-4.
AN
[3] X. Wang, W. Li, Z. Chen, M. Waje, Y. Yan, Durability investigation of carbon nanotube
as catalyst support for proton exchange membrane fuel cell, J. Power Sources. 158 (2006)
154–159. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.09.039.
M
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.155501.
[8] L. Li, Y. Yu, G.J. Ye, Q. Ge, X. Ou, H. Wu, D. Feng, X.H. Chen, Y. Zhang, Black
phosphorus field-effect transistors, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 (2014) 372.
doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.35.
[9] B. Saravanakumar, S.-J. Kim, Growth of 2D ZnO Nanowall for Energy Harvesting
Application, J. Phys. Chem. C. 118 (2014) 8831–8836. doi:10.1021/jp502057p.
[10] M.J. Allen, V.C. Tung, R.B. Kaner, Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene, Chem.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
45
PT
10 (2010) 715–718. doi:10.1021/nl9039636.
[13] J.-W. Jiang, Graphene versus MoS2: A short review, Front. Phys. 10 (2015) 287–302.
doi:10.1007/s11467-015-0459-z.
RI
[14] M. Chhowalla, H.S. Shin, G. Eda, L.-J.L.-J. Li, K.P. Loh, H. Zhang, The chemistry of
two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets, Nat. Chem. 5 (2013)
SC
263. doi:10.1038/nchem.1589.
[15] E.S. Vasilyeva, O. V Tolochko, B.K. Kim, D.W. Lee, D.S. Kim, Synthesis of tungsten
disulphide nanoparticles by the chemical vapor condensation method, Microelectronics J.
40 (2009) 687–691. doi:10.1016/j.mejo.2008.11.066.
[16]
U
Z. Wang, R. Zhao, J. He, B. Zhang, J. Ning, Y. Wang, X. Su, J. Hou, F. Lou, K. Yang, Y.
AN
Fan, J. Bian, J. Nie, Multi-layered black phosphorus as saturable absorber for pulsed
Cr:ZnSe laser, Opt. Express. 24 (2016) 1598–1603. doi:10.1364/OE.24.001598.
[17] G. Zhang, H. Qin, J. Teng, J. Guo, Q. Guo, X. Dai, Z. Fang, K. Wu, Quintuple-layer
epitaxy of thin films of topological insulator Bi2Se3, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 (2009) 53114.
M
doi:10.1063/1.3200237.
[18] H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators in
D
Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface, Nat. Phys. 5 (2009)
438. doi:10.1038/nphys1270.
TE
[19] S.A. Han, R. Bhatia, S.-W. Kim, Synthesis, properties and potential applications of two-
dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nano Converg. 2 (2015) 17.
doi:10.1186/s40580-015-0048-4.
[20] X. Li, H. Zhu, Two-dimensional MoS2: Properties, preparation, and applications, J. Mater.
EP
PT
330–331 (2015) 448–460. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2015.01.011.
[27] D. Voiry, M. Salehi, R. Silva, T. Fujita, M. Chen, T. Asefa, V.B. Shenoy, G. Eda, M.
Chhowalla, Conducting MoS2 Nanosheets as Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction,
RI
Nano Lett. 13 (2013) 6222–6227. doi:10.1021/nl403661s.
[28] Y. Li, H. Wang, L. Xie, Y. Liang, G. Hong, H. Dai, MoS2 Nanoparticles Grown on
Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction, J. Am. Chem.
SC
Soc. 133 (2011) 7296. doi:10.1021/ja201269b.
[29] X. Yinghui, Z. Qin, W. Wenjie, C. Hui, Y. Quanhong, F. Lei, Opening Two-Dimensional
Materials for Energy Conversion and Storage: A Concept, Adv. Energy Mater. 7 (n.d.)
U
1602684. doi:10.1002/aenm.201602684.
[30] Y. Xin-Yao, H. Han, W. Yawen, C. Hongyu, L.X.W. (David), Ultrathin MoS2 Nanosheets
AN
Supported on N-doped Carbon Nanoboxes with Enhanced Lithium Storage and
Electrocatalytic Properties, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 54 (n.d.) 7395–7398.
doi:10.1002/anie.201502117.
M
doi:10.1002/anie.201706426.
[32] X. Xie, T. Makaryan, M. Zhao, K.L. Van Aken, Y. Gogotsi, G. Wang, MoS2 Nanosheets
TE
[33] C. Feng, J. Ma, H. Li, R. Zeng, Z. Guo, H. Liu, Synthesis of molybdenum disulfide
(MoS2) for lithium ion battery applications, Mater. Res. Bull. 44 (2009) 1811–1815.
doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2009.05.018.
C
[34] J. Pu, Y. Yomogida, K.-K. Liu, L.-J. Li, Y. Iwasa, T. Takenobu, Highly Flexible MoS2
Thin-Film Transistors with Ion Gel Dielectrics, Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 4013–4017.
AC
doi:10.1021/nl301335q.
[35] X. Cui, Q. Xu, X. Ni, Y. Zhang, Y. Qin, Atomic-thick 2D MoS2/insulator interjection
structures for enhancing nanogenerator output, J. Mater. Chem. C. 6 (2018) 899–906.
doi:10.1039/C7TC05458K.
[36] W. Wenzhuo, Piezotronics in 2D Piezoelectric Semiconductors, (2016).
https://nanohub.org/resources/23882.
[37] J.P. Oviedo, S. Kc, N. Lu, J. Wang, K. Cho, R.M. Wallace, M.J. Kim, In situ TEM
characterization of shear-stress-induced interlayer sliding in the cross section view of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
47
PT
Yamaguchi, H.; Voiry, D.; Fujita, T.; Chen, M. Chhowalla, Photoluminescence from
Chemically Exfoliated MoS2, Nano Lett. 11 (2011) 5111–5116. doi:10.1021/nl201874w.
[40] F. Wypych, T. Weber, R. Prins, Scanning Tunneling Microscopic Investigation of 1T-
RI
MoS2, Chem. Mater. 10 (1998) 723–727. doi:10.1021/cm970402e.
[41] S.H. El-Mahalawy, B.L. Evans, The thermal expansion of 2H- MoS2, 2H-MoSe2 and 2H-
SC
WSe2 between 20 and 800 Deg C, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 9 (1976) 403–406.
doi:10.1107/S0021889876011709.
[42] A.R. Beal, H.P. Hughes, Kramers-Kronig analysis of the reflectivity spectra of 2H- MoS2 ,
2H-MoSe2 and 2H-MoTe2, J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 12 (1979) 881. doi: 10.1088/0022-
U
3719/12/5/017.
AN
[43] A.N. Enyashin, G. Seifert, Density-functional study of Lix MoS2 intercalates (0⩽x⩽1),
Comput. Theor. Chem. 999 (2012) 13–20. doi:10.1016/j.comptc.2012.08.005.
[44] R. Wei, H. Yang, K. Du, W. Fu, Y. Tian, Q. Yu, S. Liu, M. Li, G. Zou, A facile method to
prepare MoS2 with nanoflower-like morphology, Mater. Chem. Phys. 108 (2008) 188–
M
191. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.10.007.
[45] F. Wypych, R. Schollhorn, 1T- MoS2 , a New Metallic Modification of Molybdenum
D
Sadan, G. Seifert, New Route for Stabilization of 1T-WS2 and MoS2 Phases, J. Phys.
Chem. C. 115 (2011) 24586–24591. doi:10.1021/jp2076325.
[47] T. Hu, R. Li, J. Dong, A new (2 × 1) dimerized structure of monolayer 1T-molybdenum
disulfide, studied from first principles calculations, J. Chem. Phys. 139 (2013) 174702.
EP
doi:10.1063/1.4827082.
[48] J. Heising, M.G. Kanatzidis, Structure of Restacked MoS2 and WS2 Elucidated by
Electron Crystallography, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 638–643.
C
doi:10.1021/ja983043c.
AC
[49] J. Heising, M.G. Kanatzidis, Exfoliated and Restacked MoS2 and WS2: Ionic or Neutral
Species? Encapsulation and Ordering of Hard Electropositive Cations, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
121 (1999) 11720–11732. doi:10.1021/ja991644d.
[50] M. Calandra, Chemically exfoliated single-layer MoS2 Stability, lattice dynamics, and
catalytic adsorption from first principles, Phys. Rev. B. 88 (2013) 245428.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.245428.
[51] Y. Lin, D.O. Dumcenco, Y. Huang, K. Suenaga, metallic phase transition in single-
layered MoS 2, (2014). doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.64.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
48
PT
9 (2014) 391. doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.64.
[54] R. Kappera, D. Voiry, S.E. Yalcin, W. Jen, M. Acerce, S. Torrel, B. Branch, S. Lei, W.
Chen, S. Najmaei, J. Lou, P.M. Ajayan, G. Gupta, A.D. Mohite, M. Chhowalla, Metallic
RI
1T phase source/drain electrodes for field effect transistors from chemical vapor deposited
MoS2, APL Mater. 203506 (2014) 92516. doi:10.1063/1.4896077.
[55] R. Kappera, D. Voiry, S.E. Yalcin, B. Branch, G. Gupta, A.D. Mohite, M. Chhowalla,
SC
Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 transistors, Nat. Mater. 13
(2014) 1128. doi:10.1038/nmat4080.
[56] M. Mortazavi, C. Wang, J. Deng, V.B. Shenoy, N. V. Medhekar, Ab initio
U
characterization of layered MoS2 as anode for sodium-ion batteries, J. Power Sources. 268
(2014) 279–286. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.049.
AN
[57] C.M. Julien, Lithium intercalated compounds: Charge transfer and related properties,
Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports. 40 (2003) 47–102. doi:10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00104-3.
[58] J. Xiao, D. Choi, L. Cosimbescu, P. Koech, J. Liu, J.P. Lemmon, Exfoliated MoS2
M
Nanocomposite as an Anode Material for Lithium Ion Batteries, Chem. Mater. 22 (2010)
4522–4524. doi:10.1021/cm101254j.
[59] C. Guo, J. Pan, H. Li, T. Lin, P. Liu, C. Song, D. Wang, G. Mu, X. Lai, H. Zhang, W.
D
[60] J.T. Ye, Y.J. Zhang, R. Akashi, M.S. Bahramy, R. Arita, Y. Iwasa, Superconducting
Dome in a Gate-Tuned Band Insulator, Science. 338 (2012) 1193–1196.
doi:10.1126/science.1228006.
EP
Zhang, Q. Zhang, T.C. Sum, X. Qiu, Z. Liu, X. Liu, 3R MoS2 with Broken Inversion
Symmetry: A Promising Ultrathin Nonlinear Optical Device, Adv. Mater. 29 (2017)
AC
1701486. doi:10.1002/adma.201701486.
[63] G.Z. Magda, J. Pető, G. Dobrik, C. Hwang, L.P. Biró, L. Tapasztó, Exfoliation of large-
area transition metal chalcogenide single layers, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 14714.
doi:10.1038/srep14714.
[64] Y. Epshteyn, T. Risdon, Molybdenum disulfide in lubricant applications–a review, 12
Lubr. Grease Conf. (2010).
[65] E. Sliney, H. E, P.M. Ku, Proceedings of USAF Aerospace Fluids and Lubricants Conf,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
49
in: Proc. USAF Aerosp. Fluids Lubr. Conf, 1963: pp. 350–367.
[66] N.J. Doran, Electronic structure and band theory of transition metal dichalcogenides,
Phys. B+C. 99 (1980) 227–237. doi:10.1016/0378-4363(80)90237-5.
[67] F.E. Wickman, D.K. Smith, Molybdenite Polytypes in Theory and Occurrence. I.
Theoretical Considerations of Polytypism in Molybdenite, Am. Mineral. 55 (1970) 1843–
PT
1856.
[68] A. Yan, W. Chen, C. Ophus, J. Ciston, Y. Lin, K. Persson, A. Zettl, Identifying different
stacking sequences in few-layer CVD-grown MoS2 by low-energy atomic-resolution
RI
scanning transmission electron microscopy, Phys. Rev. B. 93 (2016) 41420.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.041420.
SC
[69] R. Suzuki, M. Sakano, Y.J. Zhang, R. Akashi, D. Morikawa, A. Harasawa, K. Yaji, K.
Kuroda, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, K. Ishizaka, R. Arita, Y. Iwasa, Valley-dependent spin
polarization in bulk MoS2 with broken inversion symmetry, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 (2014)
611. doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.148.
U
[70] Y.D. Liu, L. Ren, X. Qi, L.W. Yang, G.L. Hao, J. Li, X.L. Wei, J.X. Zhong, Preparation,
characterization and photoelectrochemical property of ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets via
AN
hydrothermal intercalation and exfoliation route, J. Alloys Compd. 571 (2013) 37–42.
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.031.
[71] A. Ramadoss, T. Kim, G.-S. Kim, S.J. Kim, Enhanced activity of a hydrothermally
M
hydrothermal method and their methyl orange adsorption capacity, Mater. Res. Bull. 55
(2014) 221–228. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.04.025.
TE
[73] G. Tang, Y. Wang, W. Chen, H. Tang, C. Li, Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization
of novel flowerlike MoS2 hollow microspheres, Mater. Lett. 100 (2013) 15–18.
doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2013.02.103.
EP
doi:org/10.1039/c1nr10803d.
[75] F. Niefind, W. Bensch, M. Deng, L. Kienle, J. Cruz-reyes, J. Mario, D. Valle, Applied
AC
PT
doi:10.1016/j.cap.2013.11.031.
[80] Z. Lin, M.T. Thee, A.L. Elías, S. Feng, C. Zhou, K. Fujisawa, N. Perea-López, V. Carozo,
H. Terrones, M. Terrones, Facile synthesis of MoS2 and MoxW1-xS2 triangular
RI
monolayers, APL Mater. 2 (2014) 092514. doi:10.1063/1.4895469.
[81] Y. Liu, H. Yu, X. Quan, S. Chen, Green synthesis of feather-shaped MoS2/CdS
SC
photocatalyst for effective hydrogen production, Int. J. Photoenergy. 2013 (2013) 1–6.
doi:10.1155/2013/247516.
[82] T.S.Z. A.S. Golub, N.D. Lenenko, E.P. Krinichnaya, O.P. Ivanova, I.V. Klimenko,
Nanostructured films of semiconducting molybdenum disulfide obtained through
U
exfoliation-restacking method, 2 (2013) 2–4.
AN
[83] Y.X. Zeng, X.W. Zhong, Z.Q. Liu, S. Chen, N. Li, Preparation and enhancement of
thermal conductivity of heat transfer oil-based MoS2 nanofluids, J. Nanomater. 2013
(2013). doi:10.1155/2013/270490.
[84] V. Pachauri, K. Kern, K. Balasubramanian, Chemically exfoliated large-area two-
M
[85] Y. Tian, J. Zhao, W. Fu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhu, Z. Wang, A facile route to synthesis of MoS2
nanorods, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 3452–3455. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.012.
TE
[86] T.J.B. K.S. Novoselov, . D. Jiang, F. Schedin, A.. G. V.V Khotkevich, S.V Morozov,
Two-Dimensional Atomic Crystals., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 10452–
10453.
[87] L.. L. Y. H.Lee, X.Q. Zhang, W. Zhang, M.T Chang, C.T. Lin, K.D Chang, Y.C. Yu, J.T.
EP
Wang, C.S.Chang, Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor
Deposition., Adv. Mater. (2012) 2320–2325. doi:10.1002/adma.201104798.
[88] M.S. Bao, W.; Cai, X.; Kim, D.; Sridhara, K.; Fuhrer, High Mobility Ambipolar MoS2
C
Field-Effect Transistors: Substrate and Dielectric Effects., Appl. Phys. Lett. (2013) 102.
doi:10.1063/1.4789365.
AC
[89] Z.. Wu, S.; Ross, J. S.; Liu, G.-B.; Aivazian, G.; Jones, A.; Fei, D.. et al. Zhu, W.; Xiao,
D.; Yao, W.; Cobden, Electrical Tuning of Valley Magnetic Moment through Symmetry
Control in Bilayer MoS2., Nat.Phys. (2013) 149–153. doi:10.1038/nphys2524.
[90] J.L. Q. Liu, L. Li, Y. Li, Z.Gao, Z. Chen, Tuning Electronic Structure of Bilayer MoS2 by
Vertical Electric Field: A First-Principles Investigation, J. Phys. Chem. C. (2012) 21556–
21562. doi:10.1021/jp307124d.
[91] Z.S. Gacem, K.; Boukhicha, M.; Chen, High Quality 2d Crystals Made by Anodic
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
51
PT
Semiconducting Nanosheets: High-Yield Preparation and Device Fabrication, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 11093. doi:10.1002/ange.201106004.
[94] E. Benavente, G. González, G. Benavente, E.; González, Microwave Activated Lithium
RI
Intercalation in Transition Metal Sulfides, Mater. Res. Bull. 32 (1997) 709.
doi:10.1016/S0025-5408(97)00037-8.
SC
[95] R.. S. J.N. Coleman, M. Lotya, A. O’Neill, S.D Bergin, P.J King, U. Khan, K. Young, A.
Gaucher, S De, Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered
Materials, Science (80-. ). 331 (2011) 568–571. doi:10.1126/science.1194975.
[96] R. Ganatra, Q. Zhang, Few-layer MoS2: A promising layered semiconductor, ACS Nano.
U
8 (2014) 4074–4099. doi:10.1021/nn405938z.
AN
[97] A.. Chrimes, A. F.; Khoshmanesh, K.; Stoddart, P. R.; Mitchell, K. Kalantar-zadeh,
Microfluidics and Raman Microscopy: Current Applications and Future Challenges,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 5880–5906. doi:10.1039/C3CS35515B.
[98] K.-K. Liu, W. Zhang, Y.-H. Lee, Y.-C. Lin, M.-T. Chang, C.-Y. Su, C.-S. Chang, H. Li,
M
Y. Shi, H. Zhang, Growth of Large-Area and Highly Crystalline MoS2 Thin Layers on
Insulating Substrates, Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 1538–1544. doi:10.1021/nl2043612.
D
[99] Y. Zhan, Z. Liu, S. Najmaei, P.M. Ajayan, J. Lou, Large-Area Vapor-Phase Growth and
Characterization of MoS2 Atomic Layers on a SiO2 Substrate, Small. 8 (2012) 966-
971.doi: 10.1002/smll.201102654.
TE
[100] A.L.. Shi, Y.; Zhou, W.; Lu, A. Y.; Fang, W.; Lee, Y. H.; Hsu, L.J.. et al. Kim, S. M.;
Kim, K. K.; Yang, H. Y.; Li, van der Waals Epitaxy of MoS2 Layers Using Graphene as
Growth Templates., Nano Lett. (2012) 2784–2791. doi:10.1021/nl204562j.
EP
[101] T.. Mann, J.; Sun, D.; Ma, Q.; Chen, J.-R.; Preciado, E.; Ohta, M.. et al. Diaconescu, B.;
Yamaguchi, K.; Tran, T.; Wurch, Facile Growth of Monolayer MoS2 Film Areas on SiO2.,
Eur Phys .J B. (2013) 86, 226. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013-31011-y.
C
[102] S. Najmaei, Z. Liu, W. Zhou, X. Zou, G. Shi, S. Lei, B.I. Yakobson, J.-C. Idrobo, P.M.
Ajayan, J. Lou, Vapour phase growth and grian boundary structure of molybdenum
AC
[105] M.R. Laskar, L. Ma, S. Kannappan, P. Sung Park, S. Krishnamoorthy, D.N. Nath, W. Lu,
Y. Wu, S. Rajan, Large area single crystal (0001) oriented MoS2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102
(2013). doi:10.1063/1.4811410.
[106] D.H.. Wu, S.; Huang, C.; Aivazian, G.; Ross, J. S.; Cobden, X. Xu, Vapor Solid Growth
of High Optical Quality MoS2 Monolayers with Near-Unity Valley Polarization, ACS
PT
Nano. (2013) 2768–27772. doi:10.1021/nn4002038.
[107] L. Yu, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Su, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Controlled Scalable Synthesis of
Uniform, High-Quality Monolayer and Few-Layer MoS2 Films., Sci. Rep. (2013) 1866.
RI
doi:10.1038/srep01866.
[108] K.S. Suslick, sonochemistry, NCBI. (1990) 1439–45. doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1439.
SC
[109] H. Kwon, P.J. Jeon, J.S. Kim, T.-Y. Kim, H. Yun, S.W. Lee, T. Lee, S. Im, Large scale
MoS2 nanosheet logic circuits integrated by photolithography on glass, 2D Mater. 3
(2016) 44001. doi:doi:10.1088/2053-1583/3/4/044001.
[110] A.M. van der Zande, P.Y. Huang, D.A. Chenet, T.C. Berkelbach, Y. You, G.-H. Lee, T.F.
U
Heinz, D.R. Reichman, D.A. Muller, J.C. Hone, Grains and grain boundaries in highly
crystalline monolayer molybdenum disulphide, Nat. Mater. 12 (2013) 554.
AN
doi:10.1038/nmat3633.
[111] V.E. Calado, G.F. Schneider, A.M.M.G. Theulings, C. Dekker, L.M.K. Vandersypen,
Formation and control of wrinkles in graphene by the wedging transfer method, Appl.
M
PT
doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2005.10.046.
[120] S. Helveg, J.V. Lauritsen, E. Lægsgaard, I. Stensgaard, J.K. Nørskov, B.S. Clausen, H.
Topsøe, F. Besenbacher, Atomic-Scale Structure of Single-Layer MoS2 Nanoclusters,
RI
Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 951–954. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.951.
[121] H. Topsøe, B.S. Clausen, F.E. Massoth, Hydrotreating Catalysis, in: J.R. Anderson, M.
Boudart (Eds.), Catal. Sci. Technol., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg,
SC
1996: pp. 1–269. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61040-0_1.
[122] A. Jagminas, A. Naujokaitis, R. Žalnėravičius, V. Jasulaitiene, G. Valušis, Tuning the
activity of nanoplatelet MoS2-based catalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution via
U
electrochemical decoration with Pt nanoparticles, Appl. Surf. Sci. 385 (2016) 56–62.
doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.094.
AN
[123] J. Kibsgaard, J. V Lauritsen, E. Lægsgaard, B.S. Clausen, H. Topsøe, F. Besenbacher,
Cluster−Support Interactions and Morphology of MoS2 Nanoclusters in a Graphite-
Supported Hydrotreating Model Catalyst, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 13950–13958.
M
doi:10.1021/ja0651106.
[124] L.S. Byskov, J.K. Nørskov, B.S. Clausen, H. Topsøe, Edge termination of MoS2 and
CoMoS catalyst particles, Catal. Letters. 64 (2000) 95–99.
D
doi:10.1023/A:1019063709813.
[125] F.L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M.J. Yacaman, Structural transformation of MoO3 nanobelts
TE
MoS2 nanorods grown by chemical vapor deposition, J. Cryst. Growth. 430 (2015) 1–6.
doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.08.005.
[127] R. Sen, A. Govindaraj, K. Suenaga, S. Suzuki, H. Kataura, S. Iijima, Y. Achiba,
C
Encapsulated and hollow closed-cage structures of WS2 and MoS2 prepared by laser
ablation at 450–1050°C, Chem. Phys. Lett. 340 (2001) 242–248. doi:10.1016/S0009-
AC
2614(01)00419-5.
[128] C.N. Nath, M. , Govindaraj, A. and Rao, Simple Synthesis of MoS2 and WS2 nanotubes,
Adv. Funct. Mater. 13 (2001). doi:10.1002/1521-4095(200102).
[129] Y. Li, Z. Zhou, S. Zhang, Z. Chen, MoS2 Nanoribbons: High Stability and Unusual
Electronic and Magnetic Properties, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 16739–16744.
doi:10.1021/ja805545x.
[130] C. Ataca, H. Şahin, E. Aktürk, S. Ciraci, Mechanical and Electronic Properties of MoS2
Nanoribbons and Their Defects, J. Phys. Chem. C. 115 (2011) 3934–3941.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
54
doi:10.1021/jp1115146.
[131] K. Xie, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, G. Song, S. Cheng, A facile synthesis of hierarchical MoS2
nanotori with advanced lithium storage properties, New J. Chem. 42 (2018) 10935–10939.
doi:10.1039/C8NJ01877D.
[132] A. Enyashin, S. Gemming, G. Seifert, Nanosized allotropes of molybdenum disulfide,
PT
Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 149 (2007) 103–125. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2007-00246-0.
[133] B. Visic, R. Dominko, M.K. Gunde, N. Hauptman, S.D. Skapin, M. Remskar, Optical
properties of exfoliated MoS2 coaxial nanotubes - analogues of graphene, Nanoscale Res.
RI
Lett. 6 (2011) 593. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-593.
[134] W.K. Hsu, B.H. Chang, Y.Q. Zhu, W.Q. Han, H. Terrones, M. Terrones, N. Grobert, A.K.
SC
Cheetham, H.W. Kroto, D.R.M. Walton, An Alternative Route to Molybdenum Disulfide
Nanotubes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 10155–10158. doi:10.1021/ja001607i.
[135] G. Seifert, T. Köhler, R. Tenne, Stability of Metal Chalcogenide Nanotubes, J. Phys.
Chem. B. 106 (2002) 2497–2501. doi:10.1021/jp0131323.
U
[136] V. Kralj-Iglič, M. Remškar, G. Vidmar, M. Fošnarič, A. Iglič, Deviatoric elasticity as a
AN
possible physical mechanism explaining collapse of inorganic micro and nanotubes, Phys.
Lett. A. 296 (2002) 151–155. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00265-7.
[137] T. Seifert, Gotthard and Frauenheim, On the stability of non carbon nanotubes, J. Korean
Phys. Soc. 37 (2000) 89–92.
M
doi:10.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.454.
[139] G. Seifert, H. Terrones, M. Terrones, G. Jungnickel, T. Frauenheim, Structure and
TE
doi:10.1039/B205109E.
[141] Y. Mastai, M. Homyonfer, A. Gedanken, G. Hodes, Room Temperature
Sonoelectrochemical Synthesis of Molybdenum Sulfide Fullerene-Like Nanoparticles,
C
PT
characterization of 3D flower-like MoS2 microspheres, Mater. Lett. 148 (2015) 67–70.
doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2015.02.027.
[147] R. Rosentsveig, a. Gorodnev, N. Feuerstein, H. Friedman, a. Zak, N. Fleischer, J.
RI
Tannous, F. Dassenoy, R. Tenne, Fullerene-like MoS 2 nanoparticles and their tribological
behavior, Tribol. Lett. 36 (2009) 175–182. doi:10.1007/s11249-009-9472-0.
SC
[148] K.K. Tiong, Y.S. Huang, C.H. Ho, Electrical and optical anisotropic properties of
rhenium-doped molybdenum disulphide, J. Alloys Compd. 317–318 (2001) 208–212.
doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01327-X.
[149] F.L. Deepak, R. Popovitz-Biro, Y. Feldman, H. Cohen, A. Enyashin, G. Seifert, R. Tenne,
U
Fullerene-like Mo(W)1−xRexS2 Nanoparticles, Chem. – An Asian J. 3 (2008) 1568–
1574. doi:10.1002/asia.200800083.
AN
[150] L. Rapoport, A. Moshkovich, V. Perfilyev, A. Laikhtman, I. Lapsker, L. Yadgarov, R.
Rosentsveig, R. Tenne, High Lubricity of Re-Doped Fullerene-Like MoS2 Nanoparticles,
Tribol. Lett. 45 (2012) 257–264. doi:10.1007/s11249-011-9881-8.
M
12549–12562. doi:10.1021/ja074081b.
[153] Y. Shi, J.-K. Huang, L. Jin, Y.-T. Hsu, S.F. Yu, L.-J. Li, H.Y. Yang, Selective Decoration
of Au Nanoparticles on Monolayer MoS2 Single Crystals, Sci. Rep. 3 (2013) 1839.
EP
doi:10.1038/srep01839.
[154] T.S. Sreeprasad, P. Nguyen, N. Kim, V. Berry, Controlled, Defect-Guided, Metal-
Nanoparticle Incorporation onto MoS2 via Chemical and Microwave Routes: Electrical,
C
[155] A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C.-Y. Chim, G. Galli, F. Wang, Emerging
Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2, Nano Lett. 10 (2010) 1271.
doi:10.1021/nl903868w.
[156] W. Zhao, J. Pan, Y. Fang, X. Che, D. Wang, K. Bu, F. Huang, Metastable MoS2: Crystal
Structure, Electronic Band Structure, Synthetic Approach and Intriguing Physical
Properties, Chem. - A Eur. J. (2018) 15942–15954. doi:10.1002/chem.201801018.
[157] J.T. Paul, A.K. Singh, Z. Dong, H. Zhuang, B.C. Revard, B. Rijal, M. Ashton, A.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
56
PT
Commun. 3 (2012) 887. doi:10.1038/ncomms1882.
[159] K.F. Mak, M.Y. Sfeir, Y. Wu, C.H. Lui, J.A. Misewich, T.F. Heinz, Measurement of the
Optical Conductivity of Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 196405.
RI
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.196405.
[160] K.F. Mak, K. He, C. Lee, G.H. Lee, J. Hone, T.F. Heinz, J. Shan, Tightly bound trions in
monolayer MoS2, Nat. Mater. 12 (2012) 207. doi:10.1038/nmat3505.
SC
[161] C.H. Lui, A.J. Frenzel, D. V Pilon, Y.-H. Lee, X. Ling, G.M. Akselrod, J. Kong, N.
Gedik, Trion-Induced Negative Photoconductivity in Monolayer MoS2, Phys. Rev. Lett.
113 (2014) 166801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.166801.
U
[162] T.J. Wieting, J.L. Verble, Infrared and Raman Studies of Long-Wavelength Optical
Phonons in Hexagonal MoS2, Phys. Rev. B. 3 (1971) 4286–4292.
AN
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.3.4286.
[163] C. Lee, H. Yan, L.E.L.E. Brus, T.F.T.F. Heinz, J. Hone, S. Ryu, Anomalous Lattice
Vibrations of Single- and Few-Layer MoS2, ACS Nano. 4 (2010) 2695–2700.
M
doi:10.1021/nn1003937.
[164] C. V Ramana, U. Becker, V. Shutthanandan, C.M. Julien, Oxidation and metal-insertion
in molybdenite surfaces: evaluation of charge-transfer mechanisms and dynamics,
D
doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.035423.
[167] A. Castellanos-Gomez, M. Poot, G.A. Steele, H.S.J. van der Zant, N. Agraït, G. Rubio-
Bollinger, C.-G. Andres, P. Menno, S.G. A., van der Zant Herre S. J., A. Nicolás, R.-B.
C
Gabino, Elastic Properties of Freely Suspended MoS2 Nanosheets, Adv. Mater. 24 (2012)
772–775. doi:10.1002/adma.201103965.
AC
[168] W.J. Yu, Z. Li, H. Zhou, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Huang, X. Duan, Vertically stacked multi-
heterostructures of layered materials for logic transistors and complementary inverters,
Nat. Mater. 12 (2012) 246. doi:10.1038/nmat3518.
[169] M. Buscema, M. Barkelid, V. Zwiller, H.S.J. van der Zant, G.A. Steele, A. Castellanos-
Gomez, Large and Tunable Photothermoelectric Effect in Single-Layer MoS2, Nano Lett.
13 (2013) 358–363. doi:10.1021/nl303321g.
[170] J.-W. Jiang, Z. Qi, H.S. Park, T. Rabczuk, Elastic bending modulus of single-layer
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
57
PT
(2014) 8326–8333. doi:10.1039/C4NR00279B.
[173] S. Timoshenko, S. Woinosky-Krieger, Theory of Plates and Shells Classic, 1959.
RI
[174] J.-W. Jiang, J.-S. Wang, Self-repairing in single-walled carbon nanotubes by heat
treatment, J. Appl. Phys. 108 (2010) 54303. doi:10.1063/1.3481004.
[175] J.-W. Jiang, The Strain Rate Effect on the Buckling of Single-Layer MoS2, Sci. Rep. 5
SC
(2015) 7814. doi:10.1038/srep07814.
[176] S.-Z. Yang, Y. Gong, P. Manchanda, Y.-Y. Zhang, G. Ye, S. Chen, L. Song, S.T.
Pantelides, P.M. Ajayan, M.F. Chisholm, W. Zhou, Rhenium-Doped and Stabilized MoS2
U
Atomic Layers with Basal-Plane Catalytic Activity, Adv. Mater. 30 (2018) 1803477.
doi:10.1002/adma.201803477.
AN
[177] L. Shi, W. Ding, S. Yang, Z. He, S. Liu, Rationally designed MoS2/protonated g-C3N4
nanosheet composites as photocatalysts with an excellent synergistic effect toward
photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants, J. Hazard. Mater. 347 (2018) 431–441.
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.010.
M
[178] Q. Xiong, Y. Wang, P.-F. Liu, L.-R. Zheng, G. Wang, H.-G. Yang, P.-K. Wong, H.
Zhang, H. Zhao, Cobalt Covalent Doping in MoS2 to Induce Bifunctionality of Overall
D
composite with optimized impedance matching for efficient microwave absorption, Appl.
Surf. Sci. 457 (2018) 271–279. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.263.
[181] S.E. Islam, D.-R. Hang, C.-H. Chen, K.H. Sharma, Facile and Cost-Efficient Synthesis of
C
[184] V. An, Y. Irtegov, C. De Izarra, Study of tribological properties of nanolamellar WS2 and
MoS2 as additives to lubricants, J. Nanomaterials. 2014 (2014) 865839.
doi:10.1155/2014/865839.
[185] E. S. U. S. Choi, D. A. Siginer and H. P. Wang, Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids
with Nanoparticles, in Developments and Applications of Non—Newtonian Flows,
PT
ASME FED. 231 (1995) 99–105.
[186] Y. Xu, C. Chen, V. V Deshpande, F.A. DiRenno, A. Gondarenko, D.B. Heinz, S. Liu, P.
Kim, J. Hone, Radio frequency electrical transduction of graphene mechanical resonators,
RI
Appl. Phys. Lett. 97 (2010) 243111. doi:10.1063/1.3528341.
[187] K. Kalantar-zadeh, J.Z. Ou, T. Daeneke, M.S. Strano, M. Pumera, S.L. Gras, Two-
Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides in Biosystems, Adv. Funct. Mater. 25
SC
(2015) 5086. doi:10.1002/adfm.201500891.
[188] P.M. Ajayan, J.M. Tour, Materials Science: Nanotube Composites, Nature. 447 (2007)
1066. doi:10.1038/4471066a.
U
[189] M. Pumera, A.H. Loo, Layered Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides (MoS2 and WS2) for
Sensing and Biosensing, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 61 (2014) 49.
AN
doi:10.1016/j.trac.2014.05.009.
[190] D. Sarkar, W. Liu, X. Xie, A.C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, K. Banerjee, MoS2 Field-Effect
Transistor for Next-Generation Label-Free Biosensors, ACS Nano. 8 (2014) 3992.
M
doi:10.1021/nn5009148.
[191] C. Zhu, Z. Zeng, H. Li, F. Li, C. Fan, H. Zhang, Single-Layer MoS2-Based Nanoprobes
for Homogeneous Detection of Biomolecules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 5998.
D
doi:10.1021/ja4019572.
[192] L. Wang, Y. Wang, J.I. Wong, T. Palacios, J. Kong, H.Y. Yang, Functionalized MoS2
TE
doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.01.129.
[198] X. Ma, K. Sakanishi, I. Mochida, Hydrodesulfurization reactivities of various sulfur
compounds in diesel fuel, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 33 (1994) 218–222.
doi:10.1021/ie00026a007.
[199] J.G. Speight, The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, 2nd ed; Dekker: New York,
PT
1991.
[200] J. Oudar, H. Wise, Deactivation and Poisoning of Catalysts, 1991.
RI
[201] J. Ertl, G., Kno¨zinger, H., Weitkamp, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis; ., Eds.;, in:
Handb. Heterog. Catal., Wiley-VCH: New York, New York, 1997.
[202] K.C. Taylor, NO Catalysts in Automotive Exhaust Systems., Sci. Eng. (1993) 35, 457.
SC
doi:10.1080/01614949308013915.
[203] Y.Q. Zhu, Experimental Study on Unsupported Nano-MoS<sub>2</sub>
Catalyst for Deep Desulfurization Fuel Oil, Adv. Mater. Res. 739 (2013) 16–20.
U
doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.739.16.
[204] Y.Q. Zhu, D.L. Zhou, Study on Unsupported Nano-MoS2 Catalyst for Clean Fuel, Adv.
AN
Mater. Res. 287–290 (2011) 1860–1865. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.287-
290.1860.
[205] I. V Babich, J.A. Moulijn, Science and technology of novel processes for deep
M
23. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2007.07.003.
[207] J.-F. Paul, E. Payen, Vacancy Formation on MoS2 Hydrodesulfurization Catalyst: DFT
Study of the Mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. B. 107 (2003) 4057–4064.
EP
doi:10.1021/jp027668f.
[208] N. Panariti, A. Del Bianco, G. Del Piero, M. Marchionna, P. Carniti, Petroleum residue
upgrading with dispersed catalysts: Part 2. Effect of operating conditions, Appl. Catal. A
Gen. 204 (2000) 215–222. doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00532-9.
C
[209] C.T. Tye, K.J. Smith, Catalytic activity of exfoliated MoS2 in hydrodesulfurization,
AC
[212] C.-B. Ma, X. Qi, B. Chen, S. Bao, Z. Yin, X.-J. Wu, Z. Luo, J. Wei, H.-L. Zhang, H.
Zhang, MoS2 nanoflower-decorated reduced graphene oxide paper for high-performance
hydrogen evolution reaction, Nanoscale. 6 (2014) 5624. doi:10.1039/c3nr04975b.
[213] J. Chen, S.L. Li, Z.L. Tao, Novel hydrogen storage properties of MoS2 nanotubes, J.
Alloys Compd. 356–357 (2003) 413–417. doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00114-2.
PT
[214] J. Chen, N. Kuriyama, H. Yuan, H.T. Takeshita, T. Sakai, Electrochemical Hydrogen
Storage in MoS2 Nanotubes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 11813–11814.
doi:10.1021/ja017121z.
RI
[215] Z. Zhou, Y. Lin, P. Zhang, E. Ashalley, M. Shafa, H. Li, J. Wu, Z. Wang, Hydrothermal
fabrication of porous MoS2 and its visible light photocatalytic properties, Mater. Lett. 131
(2014) 122–124. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.162.
SC
[216] H. Li, K. Yu, X. Lei, B. Guo, H. Fu, Z. Zhu, Hydrothermal Synthesis of Novel MoS2
/BiVO 4 Hetero-Nanoflowers with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity and a Mechanism
Investigation, J. Phys. Chem. C. 119 (2015) 22681–22689. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06729.
U
[217] N. Shao, J. Wang, D. Wang, P. Corvini, Preparation of three-dimensional Ag3PO4/TiO2@
MoS2 for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity and anti-photocorrosion, Appl.
AN
Catal. B Environ. 203 (2017) 964–978. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.008.
[218] Y. Yuan, P. Shen, Q. Li, G. Chen, H. Zhang, L. Zhu, B. Zou, B. Liu, Excellent
photocatalytic performance of few-layer MoS2/graphene hybrids, J. Alloys Compd. 700
M
Type Doping and Encapsulation of Flexible MoS2 Devices with SU8, Adv. Electron.
Mater. 5 (2018) 1800492. doi:10.1002/aelm.201800492.
[221] M.-L. Tsai, S.-H. Su, J.-K. Chang, D.-S. Tsai, C.-H. Chen, C.-I. Wu, L.-J. Li, L.-J. Chen,
EP
J.-H. He, Monolayer MoS2 Heterojunction Solar Cells, ACS Nano. 8 (2014) 8317–8322.
doi:10.1021/nn502776h.
[222] V.H.V. Quy, E. Vijayakumar, P. Ho, J.-H. Park, J.A. Rajesh, J. Kwon, J. Chae, J.-H. Kim,
C
S.-H. Kang, K.-S. Ahn, Electrodeposited MoS2 as electrocatalytic counter electrode for
quantum dot- and dye-sensitized solar cells, Electrochim. Acta. 260 (2018) 716–725.
AC
doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.023.
[223] R.K. Ulaganathan, K. Yadav, R. Sankar, F.C. Chou, Y.-T. Chen, Hybrid InSe Nanosheets
and MoS2 Quantum Dots for High-Performance Broadband Photodetectors and
Photovoltaic Cells, Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 6 (2018) 1801336.
doi:10.1002/admi.201801336.
[224] S. Konabe, T. Yamamoto, Valley photothermoelectric effects in transition-metal
dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B. 90 (2014) 75430. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.075430.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
61
Acknowledgments
PT
This study was funded by the SERB, Department of Science and Technology project no.
RI
EMR/2016/002815.
SC
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
62
Figure Captions
PT
Figure 2 Structural polytypes of layered MoS2: (a) 2H, (b) 3R, (c) 1T and (d) 2T. a, b and c
RI
denote the lattice constants of the hexagonal unit cell. Yellow and purple spheres represent S and
Mo atoms, respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56] Copyright (2014) Elsevier.
SC
Figure 3 Schematic display of suggested three kinds of metal–atom clustering patterns and
superstructures for the 1T-MoS2: (a) a × 2a chain formation, (b) 2a × 2a diamond shape, and (c)
U
a√) X a√) triangular clustering. Reprinted with permission from Ref [47]. Copyright (2013)
AIP Publishing.
AN
Figure 4 Schematic showing the stacking orders for 2H and 3R phases MoS2 in the single-
layer, bilayer and trilayer forms viewed from side and top. Red spheres represent Mo atoms and
M
yellow spheres represent S atoms. Reprinted with permission from Ref [68]. Copyright (2016)
APS Physics Publishing.
D
Figure 6 Atomic models of MoS2 nanoplatelets with triangular shape and zigzag-like S-
EP
terminated edge (1 ), with triangular shape and armchair-like edge (2 ), with hexagonal shape (3 )
and experimentally observed STM images. Reprinted with permission from Ref [123]. Copyright
(2006) ACS Publishing. Reprinted with permission from Ref [120]. Copyright (2000) APS
C
Physics Publishing.
AC
Figure 7 (a) Zigzag simulated single-layer MoS2 nanotube, viewed along the tube axis (middle)
and the c-axis (lower) (b) Armchair simulated single-layer MoS2 nanotube, viewed along the
tube axis (middle) and the c-axis (lower). Reprinted with permission from Ref [134]. Copyright
(2000) American Chemical Societ
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
63
Figure 8 Indirect to direct band gap conversion process. Calculated electronic band structures
of bulk, four-layer, two-layer, and single-layer MoS2 (from left to right). Black arrows indicate
the fundamental transitions. The horizontal dashed lines demonstrate the energy of the highest
occupied states at the K point, which becomes the VBM in single layers. As the number of layers
decrease, the energy at the G point reduces, and it becomes lower than K point state in single
layers, leading to direct gap transition. Reprinted with permission from Ref [155] . Copyright
PT
(2010) American Chemical Society.
RI
Figure 9 (a) The building of bulk 1T and 2H MoS2 and corresponding 4d orbital splitting of
SC
Mo4+. (b, c) Calculated band structures of bulk 1T and 2H phases. Reprinted with permission
from [156] Copyright (2018) John Wiley and Sons.
U
Figure 10 Raman scattering spectrum of 2H-MoS2 single crystal showing the anisotropic
character of the vibrational modes. The interlayer shear mode observed at 33.5 cm-1 is typical of
AN
the trigonal prismatic structure [164]. Open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License.
M
Figure 11) a) Raman spectra of thin (nL) and bulk MoS2films. The solid line for the 2L spectrum
is a double Voigt fit through data (circles for 2L, solid lines for the rest). (b) Frequencies of E12g
D
and A1g Raman modes (left vertical axis) and their difference (right vertical axis) as a function of
layer thickness. (c) Atomic displacements of the four Raman active modes and one IR active
TE
mode (E1u) in the unit cell of the bulk MoS 2crystal. Reprinted with permission from [163]
Copyright (2010) American Chemical Society..
EP
Figure 12 Length dependence (log-log) of the buckling critical strain for the SLMoS2 at strain
rates of 109 s−1, 108 s−1, and 107 s−1, respectively. Simulated data are fitted to the function, which
C
Figure 14 Schematic diagram describing the possible mechanism of the tribological action of
nanolamellar disulfides: (1–3) disassembling the nanolamellar particles under shear stress, (4)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
64
formation of a nanoscale tribofilm [184]. open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License.
Figure 15 (a) A ball-model (top view) of a bulk truncated MoS2 hexagon with Mo and S edges
PT
being exposed. The Mo (blue) atoms at the Mo edges are coordinated to only four S atoms
(yellow), whereas the Mo atoms in the bulk are coordinated to six S atoms. (b)–(d) Side view of
Mo edges. (b) The naked Mo edge in (a). (c) The Mo edges are terminated with S atoms resulting
in S dimers at the edges; i.e., we have 2 S per Mo atom at the edges. In (d) there is only one S
RI
atom per Mo atom at the edges. In this case, the S edge is reconstructed with respect to the S
dimer model in (c). The S atoms move vertically to the Mo plane and shift laterally with half a
lattice constant. (e) A top view of (d). Models (d) and (e) depict the triangular structure observed
SC
in the STM images with the S edge atoms being out of registry with the S atoms in the basal
plane of MoS2. Reprinted with permission from Ref [120]. Copyright (2000) APS Physics
Publishing
U
AN
List of Tables
Table 1 Comparison of device properties of FETs with 2H phase and 1T phase electrodes . [54]
M
Figure 1
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
Figure 2
D
TE
C EP
AC
.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2
Figure 3
PT
RI
U SC
Figure 4
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
3
Figure 5
PT
RI
SC
Figure 6
U
AN
M
D
TE
Figure 7
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4
Figure 8
PT
RI
U SC
AN
Figure 9
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
5
Figure 10
PT
RI
SC
Figure 11
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
6
Figure 12
PT
RI
U SC
AN
Figure 13
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7
Figure 14
PT
RI
U SC
Figure 15
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights
2. Discusses various types of synthesis process along with their merits and demerits.
3. Various properties are discussed with proper references for understanding its unique
PT
features
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC