community short notes
community short notes
community short notes
studocu
Module- 1 Unit-
1 Community
meaning
• Economic system regulates the factors of production, including land, capital, labor and
physical resources
• An economic system encompasses many institutions, agencies decision making process
and patterns of consumption that comprise the economic structure of a given community
Types of economic system
1 Capitalism
2. Socialist economy
3. Mixed economy
Cbaracteristics of economic system
1 Capitalism
• Right to private properp
• Profit motive
• Freedom of choice
• Market forces
• Minimal role of government
2. Socialist economy
• Social u'e1fare motive
• Limited right to private motive
• Central planning
3 Mixed economy
• Resources are owed both by the government as well as private individuals
• Private and public sectors exist side by side
• All basic and heavy industries and other strategic sector of an economy trade are left for
the private sector Political system
• A political system defines the process for making official government decisions
• According to David Easton “a political system can be designated as the interactions
through u'hich values are authoritatively allocated for a sociep” Cbaracteristics of
political system
• Use or threat of use of legal force
• Interactions
• Interdependence of parts
• Comprehensiveness
• Change of boundaq Cultural system
• A cultural system is the interaction of different elements in culture
• While a cultural system is very different from a social system, sometimes both systems
together are reffered to as the socio-cultural s}stein
Legal system
• A legal system is a procedure or process for interpreting and enforcing the law
• Coma
• Confusion
• Delirium
• Disorientation
• Lethargy
• Stupor
Social problems
• The term “social problem” is usually taken to refer to social conditions that disrupt or
damage sociep —crime, racism, and the like.
• A social problem is any condition or behavior that has negative consequences for large
numbers of people and that is generally recognized as a condition or behavior that needs
to be addressed. This definition has both an objective component and a subjective
component
Domination
• Housing
• Employment
• Education
• Health Status
• Leisure/Recreation
• Spiritualip /Religion
• Citizenship and Civic Engagement
• Valued Social Roles (e g., marriage, Parenting)
• Peer Support
• Self-Determination
’spatial practices’ to discuss hon' the experiences of space, of the constructed surroundings,
of a landscape or of a neighbourhood are not static properties but active practices These
practices change over time, as u'ell as for different people. mptions about neighbourhoods,
neighbourhood residents and community
Factors of leadership
Follower:
Different people require different sp les of leadership. For example, a new hire requires more
supervision Than an experienced employee A person who lacks motivation requires a different
approach than one With a high degree of motivation. You must know your people! The
fundamental starting point is having a Good understanding of human nature, such as needs,
emotions, and motivation. You must come to know’ Your employees’ be, know, and do attributes.
Leader:
You must have an honest understanding of who you are, what you know, and what you can do
Also, note That it is the followers, not the leader who determines if a leader is successful. If they
do not trust or lack Confidence in their leader, then they u'ill be uninspired. To be successful you
have to convince }our Follou'ers, not yourself or your superiors, that } on are worthy of being
fo11ou'ed
You lead through two-way communication Much of it is nonverbal For instance, u'hen you “set
the Example,” that communicates to your people that you would not ask their to perform
anything that you Would not be willing to do What and hon' you communicate either builds or
harms the relationship Bemeen you and your employees
To reduce conflict, relieve tense situations and do not annoy the team, an organizer must know
how to be funny
Fearlessness:
Grassroots organizing means leading the army ground forces of an organization to take real
risks and must be unafraid of the consequences Ability to hear:
Good organizers are able to hear what people say and reflect on it
Awareness of their own-interest.
Organizers understand u'hat they want to get out of a situation
Ability to be self-critical:
Organizers are not simply brainless hooligans ing to pick a quarrel, but people able to consider
what could potentially happen if they take a course of action Willingness to share power:
Organizers have to be willing to give up power, let members make decision, and ultimately be
willing to win or to lose if that's where's members' decisions lead The Role of a Community
Organizer
• Ensures Security and Communal Protection
• Maintains Togetherness of the Neighbors
• Conveys the Minds of the People to Authorities
• Drives Economic Expertise
• Plans Social Activities
• Schedules Organizational Tasks
• Maintains Accountability and Transparency
• Generates Queries and Responds to the Same
• Recruits Leaders
Security and Communal Protection
A Community Organizer (CO) is responsible for the safe dwelling of his community He is
required to engage security agents in cases of insecuritv and threat to the community He is also
Üo'
• Voluntary cooperation
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran gmail .com)
• Self-help
• Development of local leadership (indigenous leadership)
• Education
If this model is used u'hile u'orking w'ith the communities, one can see Increase in local people's
participation in all the programmes It increases The capabilities of local people. Because of
increase in cooperation, Development of local leadership is promoted. The ultimate result of this
Model show's einpou'erinent of people. The main challenge to the Community worker using
locality development model is how to increase the Community participation. For understanding
the community, he/she has to Use different strategies and techniques such as meeting and
interviewing key Informants and conducting focus group discussions The communip worker
Should make special efforts to involve communiq and political leaders, Members of agencies
working in that area and other professionals. She/he Should ensure that marginalized people also
participate in the assessment of Common needs and interests. The cominunip u'orker also has to
create Opportunities for equal participation especially during the process of Problem-solving and
decision-making. Identi ing common interests and Needs, and accordingl} deciding common
goals/objectives for development Is an important part in the u'hole process. The major role of the
communip Worker in implementing locality development model is that of an enabler And a
catalyst. She/he brings people together (organizational skills), initiates Communication (problem
solving), and develops understanding to promote Interpersonal relationship among the
communip members. The NGOs who Want to implement various schemes and programmes to
fulfill the needs of a Particular area or community may use this model It involves netu'orking
And coordination with various agencies who offer different services for the Welfare of
communities
Social Planning Model
Social planning model is basically concerned with social problems Its main Goal is to solve
community problems. It emphasizes a technical process of Problem-solving with regard to social
problems such as housing, health, etc. As stated by Rothman, rational, deliberatively planned and
controlled Change has a central place in this model The community u'orker can collect
Information regarding the needs of the community and services available in That particular
community/area Based on this, he can suggest solutions to Get the maximum benefits from these
services For example, problems of housing, illiteracy, non-availability of appropriate health
services, etc. are important issues which need attention. Once the data is collected, the analysis of
the data may be done by the u'orker or professionals. Accordingly, decisions are taken by
professionals. Issues are prioritized by service providers. At this stage, the involvement of
communip people in planning is almost negligible. In other words, the power remains with
planners and service providers. In this process, conflict may arise between the community and
service providers. In this model, planning is done for and not with community people.
Someu'here, the feeling of donor and receiver comes. This also increases dependency on
outsiders. In short, capacity building and empowerment of coinmunip people for development is
not a major goal of this model. The planner normally establishes contacts with the organization
and/or government body and makes arrangement to deliver services which fulfill the needs of the
community. By using this model, there might be either consensus or conflict with the people
There are various services to cater to the needs of a society such as health, education, sanitation,
employment, etc Social planning model presupposes that change requires expert planners.
Through expert's technical abilities and skills of dealing with bureaucrats, they can bring the
desired change. The focus here is on establishing, arranging, and delivering goods and services to
people who need them. The role of a community worker in this model is that of a researcher
(u'ho can collect data), programme implementer, and spokesperson (if required) with bureaucrats.
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran No' gmail .com)
Social Action Model
Each society has small communities and groups They are directly controlled by the
governments' policies and laws Informally, they are controlled by the customs, traditions and
beliefs of the respective community as well. All these factors decide the social rights of an
individual The macro level policies affect the micro level people This model aims to change
decisions, societal structures and cultural beliefs. Social action is a strategy used by groups or
communities who feel that they have inadequate pou'er and resources to meet their needs. This
model presupposes a disadvantaged segment of the population that needs to be organized, in
order to make adequate demands They are deprived of resources. To give them social justice and
bring democracy, equalip in real sense of the word, this approach is practiced. To bring equalip,
one has to confront the pou'er structure It aims at making basic changes in major institutions or
community practices. This model emphasizes on social justice, equalip, redistribution of pou'er
and resources, participation in decision-making and/or changing basic policies of formal
organizations It demands for improved treatment Conflict as a method is used to solve their
issues related to inequalities and deprivation, especially for the issues like women's liberation,
reservation policy, right to information, etc. Social action model focuses on the review of social
policies and practices that continue to disempower and oppress the marginalized people. It aims
to achieve social progress by modi ing social policies and changing social legislations (if
required) and welfare services The role of the communip worker may be of an activist or
advocate. She/he creates opportunities for marginalized people to participate, be heard and
makes decisions on activities that affect their qualip of life Social action model use change
tactics of conflict or contrast, such as confrontation and direct action or negotiation. Some of the
tactics usually used in the social action model are campaigns, appeals, petitions, boycotts, strikes,
picketing, sit-ins, etc. But some tactics are non-violent yet illegal and represent a form of civil
disobedience In this model, the community worker uses all means to pressurize the power
structure to give justice to the people The role of a communip worker may be that of an
advocate, activist, agitator, broker, mediator or negotiator, depending on the issues and situations.
This is a long process which goes through different stages. It is ver difficult to predict the
success rate However, the communip worker can sow the seeds of social change The role of a
communip worker also changes at every stage. The u’e1l-knou’n examples of this model are
Narmada Bachao Andolan, Lokpal Vidheyak, and Right to Information Act.
The practice of each of these models may require certain techniques and Skills. Many communip
workers use a combination of more than one model
MODULE-5 APPLICATION OF COMML NITh" ORGANIZATION IN THE ¥’ARIOL S
FIELD OF SOCIAL U'ORK UNIT 15 Social Audit
A social audit is a formal review’ of a company's endeavors, procedures, and code of conduct
regarding social responsibilitv and the company’s impact on sociep. A social audit is an
assessment of how u'ell the company is achieving its goals or benchmarks for social
responsibility
• A social audit is a way of measuring, understanding, reporting and ultimately improving an
organization's social and ethical performance. A social audit helps to narrow' gaps
between vision/goal and reality, between efficiency and effectiveness It is a technique to
understand, measure, verify, report on and to improve the social performance of the
organization
Make sure to veri the processes by visiting the workplace: otherwise, a small mistake in the
social auditing report might leave the accuracy of the whole report in jeopardy #5 Present the
report:
The main purpose of conducting a social audit is to present the report about the work process of
an organization The report is presented to designated management or shareholders, and
sometimes reports are presented publicly
Hou'ever, a company holds the right whether to share report publicly or not. Finally, the required
steps are taken to address the issues.
SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STL DIES
Social impact assessment (SIA) is a methodology to review the social effects of infrastructure
projects and other development interventions Although SIA is usually applied to planned
interventions, the same techniques can be used to evaluate the social impact of unplanned events,
for example, disasters, demographic change, and epidemics SIA is important in applied
anthropology, as its main goal is to be able to deliver positive social outcomes and eliminate any
possible negative or long term effects
• Social impact assessment is a technical means to analyze and evaluate the impact and
result of policies, projects, events, activities, and so on in social aspect.
• Social impact assessments are used to identi and manage the social impacts of
industrial projects
• Social impact assessment is a specific social science research method applied to policies
or projects, which is aimed at understanding the situation, reasons, and results of social
life. Scientific knou'1edge and methods will be used to anal} ze the social changes,
This document is available on studocu
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran No' gmail .com)
impacts, and results caused by policies or projects, and useful knowledge or policies will
be offered to reduce negatives and achieve effective management
PRA/PLA TECHNIQU ES
• Participatoq rural appraisal (PRA) is an approach used by non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and other agencies involved in international development The
approach aims to incorporate the knou'ledge and opinions of rural people in the
planning and management of development projects and programmes.
• PRA(Participatop Rural Appraisal) is a governing famil} of approach and methods to
enable local people to share enhance and analyze their knou'1edge of life and conditions
and to plan, act, monitor and evaluate Robert Chambers
• PRA is also called Participatop Learning Appraisal (PLA) because of the enduring
learning process between the research team and local rural people • The term PLA
introduced in 1995 is sometimes used to describe PRA but is broader and includes other
similar or related approaches and methods.
Various methods of PR.4/PLA
• Social Map and resources map
• Mobilip Map
• Preference Ranking
• Seasonal Calendar
• Timeline
• Well-being ranking
• Transect Map and Walk •
• Circle or Venn Diagram
• Problem Tree
Social Map and resources map
• Social map: Active involvement of people of the communip in drau'ing map of houses,
dharmashala, water tapes, temples, monasteries, pati-pauwa, school, NGO offices, banks,
mills, industries etc located in the community
• Process of preparation: social mapping should not be very big or very small 50-60
houses should be shown in one map The map can be drau'n in paper or on ground
ansectip Map
• Resources flap Collectin•_ information on local rivers. brooks. roads, dams. forests.
hillocks. m inerals. ii ells bonds. and other sources
• Utility • Location of buildings. structures. offices. etc can be traced easily • Enables eas;’
identification of” local resources. use and distrilautions
• Short ing the dail4 Iife of“ the people. economic and social process
• Short iri_• lTlarria•_es relationships. jobs.. entertainments. manual ›i orks. ii a_•es.
medical cares. consumer be hat iors. education. migrations etc
• Utility -Depicts the mobility’ of local people. makes eas} to comprehend sociaL cultural
and econorrlic chan•_es Preference Ranking
• Local people giving priorip and focus on their genuine and immediate problems they are
facing related to development and other tribulations.
• They rank their problems on preferences basis
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran No' gmail .com)
• Utilip -Local problems and preferences can be easily understood.
• Enhances local interests Seasonal Calendar
• Information can be collected from local people and calendar designed on local peoples
professional preoccupations, festivals, processions, feasts, migrating for jobs, epidemic,
diseases, scarcip time of crops etc Timeline
• Collecting information on historical events, epidemics, floods, natural disasters, drought,
heavy rainfalls, fire, constructions of school, offices and other buildings, voluntap
labours, development works, political events etc • All events of the coininunip shou'n
clearly Well-being ranking
• Collecting information of economic status/condition of the people
• Local social/cultural criteria for evaluating economic status. Transect Map and W'alk
• Information collected on— • Geographical location of community
• Structure of land resources
• Soil fertility
• Types of land etc
Circle or Venn Diagram
• Showing government and non-government offices and their impacts(functioning
patterns) on communip in a Venn diagram. Process of Venn Diagram
• This diagram is drawn on paper, blackboard, or ground
• Active participation of people Problem Tree
• Problem tree drau'n on paper, blackboard or ground
• Poverty, illiteracy, superstition, diseases, drug addiction, alcoholism, all social, cultural,
economic & political deformities discussed & drawn
• On one branch of the problem tree, only one problem is shown, reasons revealed UNIT-
16
ON GOING COM4IL NITN" PROGRAMMES AT THE GRASS ROOT LEVEL
The process of social planning largely denotes sketching of the blueprint of predetermined social
and economic goals, in both spatial and temporal context It involves prioritizing needs and
setting up of clearly defined goals It also includes critical analysis of the existing and to be
acquired resources in terms of men, money, materials, organisations and technologies, so as to
obtain maximum result sat minimum costs. Social planning is done with the inherent goal of
obtaining economic growth with social justice, maximizing work opportunities, self-reliance,
enhancing income, removing regional and caste-class disparities, alleviating poverty, and in sum,
to improve the quality of life of the nation as a whole.
India, u'ith almost three-fourths of the rural population, is predominantly an agrarian society
Rural development has a direct bearing on the count ’s economic and social development. So
long as the rural masses remain deprived of adequate developmental opportunities, any thought
of making the county one among the developed nations would be futile. Since independence,
various plans and programmes have been launched for the progress and development of rural
areas For almost four decades, social planning for rural people was governed by ‘trickle down
approach’, as you have already read in the previous units of this block. The institutions of
planning, the officials and administrators at the higher level would decide upon the plans and
This document is available on studocu
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran No' gmail .com)
programmes to be implemented for the rural areas. In spite of all the exhortations and efforts,
Planning from below' remained elusive and non-involvement of the target group, that is, the rural
people, in the planning process remained problem area This had negative repercussions on the
expected outcome of the plans and programmes for rural development
This Act provides a Constitutional status to the Panchayat Raj, plugging in many of the loopholes
observed in the earlier system that existed since the late fifties The new system ensures
involvement of all sections of the society, including the disadvantaged, w'omen, SCs, STs, OBCs,
in the process of economic, social and political development through appropriate reservation of
seats
MEANING AND SCOPE OF GRASSROOTS LE$’EL PLANNING
As u'e already know, rural development bears a special significance in the development of the
count Keeping these considerations in mind, a lot of planning and programme initiations have
been done for rural development. Many steps have been taken for agricultural growih,
employment of rural youth, u'ater supply, infrastructure development, housing, health and
education sectors. Planners at the higher level would formulate programmes and schemes for the
development of rural areas u'ithout being fully aware of the ground realities
lN the post independence period, systematic efforts were made from time to time for the overall
development of rural areas. Community Development Programmes(CDP) were launched in the
first five year plan period Agricultural development was one of the core issues of CDP. People's
participation through certain grassroots level institutions like the block level institutions, village
panchayats, gram Sabha’sl,mahila mandali, youth clubs, krishi charcha mandali, was tried. But
these grassroots level institutions were largely voluntary, u'ithout any statutory back-up A vast
sum of money was spent on rural development through different sectorial departments trying to
reach the rural people directly with skeletal field level functionaries Several new programmes
and schemes were launched even now and then u'ithout paying any attention to the ground
realities and needs and priorities of the rural masses Weak planning capabilities at the block
level and absence of effective village based institutions of the people's participation compounded
the problems of grass roots level planning. Figure 1 gives the flow of planning information and
resources from top In this approach of ‘planning from above’, the target group is the mare
passive receptor of the programmes and services. This short-sightedness was reflected in the
implementation of these programmes and schemes, as they couldn't yield the desired result.
Let us tp to understand the meaning of grass roots level planning It may be defined as the form
of planning lower institutional levels of the block and village, w'here the people from all sections
of the sociep get together and enlist and prioritize the areas of intervention, take a view of their
resources and formulate, execute and supervise the plans for the development of their ou'n
communip by sharing responsibilities among themselves. Figure 2 shows the planning process
and flow of resources and information in the grass roots level planning. It must be emphasized
that grass roots level planning is decentralized planning where the people at the grass roots not
only have the authorip to plan for their own community, but also the power to use resources for
effective implementation and to supervise the whole process. It also involves sharing of
responsibilip and accountabilip among themselves for the socio-economic development of their
own communip as u'ell as that of the nation.
Centre-District-Block- ¥’illage
Under the system of democratic decentralization, which is popularly termed as Panchayat Raj in
the context of rural areas, the rural people elect village Panchayat members, who are responsible
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran No' gmail .com)
for executing the plans and programmes for rural development. The village members participate
in the planning of rural development programmes and its monitoring, supervision and evaluation
through gram sabhas One of the unique features of this democratic decentralization is the
involvement of all sections of the sociep in the planning and execution process.
The weaker sections of the sociep, who have, more or less, never been involved in decision-
making process for community development are given the legal right tube a part of the grass
roots level planning. The scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, the other backward classes and
women have been given due reservation of seat sin various u'ards and constituencies. The
inherent theme behind the involvement of representatives of u'eaker sections has been to secure
the well-being of their respective fellowmen. In the same manner, women are expected to raise
issues related to the welfare and u'ell-being of females during planning process in Panchayat
In the grass roots planning, the village Panchayat deals with many issues pertaining to rural
development like regulating building construction, protection of public lands against
encroachment, maintenance of traditional drinking u'ater sources, collection and disposal of solid
waste and regulation of liquid waste disposal, maintenance of environmental hygiene,
management of public markets, vector control, protection of roads and other public properties,
street lighting and its maintenance, adoption of immunization programmes, agriculture related
activities like cultivating u aste land sand marginal lands, soil protection, encouraging
horticulture and vegetable cultivation and management of Krishi-Bhavans.
The scope of grass roots level planning is too vast. It also includes other crucial areas like animal
husbandry and dairy fanning, minor irrigation, fishing, social forests, small scale industries, rural
housing, u ater supply, electricip and energy, education, public works, public health and
sanitation, social welfare, poverp alleviation, development and welfare of scheduled castes and
scheduled tribes, promotion of sports and cultural affairs, public distribution system, relief work
during natural calamities, etc Apart from all these areas of intervention, it is the dub of the
Panchayat to ensure people's participation in all the activities for the development of the village
and to maintain transparency in their work
THE PA CHAYATI R.4J SY STEM .4ND GRASSROOTS LEVEL PLANNING
Meaning of three tier system of panchayati raj:
Gram Panchayat Sabha (or) village panchayat:
1 This is the village level of the Panchayati system which is also known as the village level
system
1 The Sarpanch is the head of this Sabha and the members of this panchayat are elected once
every five } ears by the Gram Sabha.
Panchayati Samiti:
1 This is the block level of the Panchayati raj system at the tehsil level. 1 This
Samiti is the associate between village level and district level panchayat Zila
Parishad Samiti:
1 This is the district level or the top of the Panchayati raj Samiti. The members of this samiti
govern the advanced system
b) The ou'nership of minor forest produce and to manage all types of village markets.
c) To prevent alienation of land and to take appropriate action to restore any unlau'full}
alienated land of a Scheduled Tribe in the scheduled areas.
d) Exercise control over money-lending to tribals, and control institutions and functionaries
u'orking in the social sectors in the area
e) Control over local plans and its resources including tribal sub-plans.
Major Areas of Grassroots Level Planning
According to the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, there are 29 items, covering different
aspects of socio-economic life of the villages such as regulatory functions to maintain civic
amenities, social service and infrastructure, development and enhancement of economic
resources of the village and welfare and development of ’eaker sections, particularly the families
below the povem, line. The 29 itemstransferred to PR institutions can be grouped into seven
major sectors as follows:
Sector 1: Agriculture and Allied Activities
1)Agriculture and extension
2) Land improvement, land reforms, consolidation, soil and u'ater conservation
3) Minor irrigation
4) Animal husbands, dairying, poultry, etc
5) Fisheries
Sector 2: Forestry and Environment
6) Social and farm forestry
7) Fuel and fodder
8) Minor forest products
9) Non-conventional energy resources
Sector 3: Industries
UNIT — 18
STRATEGIES OF SOCL4L ACTION Collaborative Strategy
In this strategy social workers collaborate with the local authorip and other authorities or
agencies in order to bring about improvements in the existing social policy The underlying
assumption of this approach is homogeneip of values and interests, through which substantive
agreement on proposed interventions is obtained. It doesn't involve loss or gain of power,
authorip or money: change occurs within a consensus that includes both values and interests In
collaborative stratergy the change in the social structure or institution is brought about by
peaceful means u'hich include education, persuasion, demonstration, and experimentation. One
of the premise on which it is based is that all those who have power will not necessarily respond
to change only through the conflictual approach. Through the above techniques, change can be
brought about as for them, the intended change is either the lesser of the two evils, or, they have
themselves identified the factors which affect the very existence of the institution or the
achievement of its goals. They themselves are disenchant
Advocacy And Negotiate Strategy
The second set of techniques are based on the premise that one anticipates some resistance to
change, and the activip of the change agent may have to be accompanied by tactics which are not
persuasive rather seek to affect change through pressure. In this strate contending parties utilize
commonly accepted campaign tactics of persuasion, negotiation and bargaining with the
willingness to arrive at a u'orking agreement.
teacher pours knowledge For Freire education is the practice of liberation both for the student
and the teacher
Freire has influenced education, health and cominunip development workers globally In an
international development context he critiqued the role of agricultural extension
workers and the ‘aid’ or ‘helping’ relationships which are based on an ideology of paternalism,
social control and non-reciprocity betu'een experts and ‘helpees’ Instead he poses an approach
based on equality, the abolition of privilege and non-elitist forms of leadership. This does not de-
role or de-skill the Social Action practitioner Rather it emphasises a different set of skills. These
are: listening; being interested in what matters to peopleasking open questions and listening and
accepting answers (even u'hen they clash u'ith your own values/view of the u'or1d); facilitating
open conversations: humility about what you don't know as well as what you do know Social
Action facilitators engage in dialogue with communip members and learn together how they can
apply their common partial knou'1edge of the subject being problematised Freire challenged the
notion of donors and recipients (see Pedagog} of the Oppressed and Cultural Action for
Freedom). For Social Action this means addressing the power relations bemeen the paid
professional and the ‘service user’ This means making yourself vulnerable as a worker because
you become the co-creators with communip members - the experts in their lives and their world.
Your skills are in facilitating conversations and enabling the ‘experts’ to uncover their worlds
This is what Friere describes as having the abilip to ‘dialogue u'ith educatees in a mode of
reciprocip'’
Social Action has taken his approach and methodolo and developed and adapted it to
work across the human services. Freire's critique of mainstream education in Brazil
resonated with m}/our experience of u'orking in communities and different service user
groups in the UK. For the most part u'e don't come from the communities in which we
practise This difference may be based on geography, class, race, gender, disability, age,
sexuality or other forms of difference. The challenge then is to connect with the group
or individual in a u'ay that generates a creative process.
There are three connected parts to Freire's methods which have influenced and guided
the development of Social Action. 1. Freire's approach is based on a belief that change
ALINSKY
Saul Alinsky, communip activist and writer in the USA in the l950s/60s, wrote Rules for
Radicals, which influenced our early ideas about the relationship between individual action and
social change. He focused on communitv organising and was involved with key social issues of
the period, activating communities to challenge injustice.
“It is a grave situation when a people resign their citizenship or when a resident of a great city,
though he may desire to take a hand, lacks the means to participate. That citizen sinks further
into apathy, anonymity, and de-personalization. The result is that he comes to depend on public
authority and a state of civic-sclerosis sets in” (Alinsky Prologue to Rules for Radicals 197 l)
Alinsky's u'ork connected with Social Action because his philosophy is “anchored in optimism It
must be, for optimism brings u'ith it hope for a future with a purpose - and therefore a will to
fight for a better world. Without optimism there is no reason to carry on.”
Alinsky also had clear ideas on the role of the cominunip organiser and how you must look and
behave to engage in effective community organising “u'ith people who do not participate in the
endless responsibilities of citizenship and are resigned to live lives determined by others”
Because “to lose your identip as a citizen of democracy is but a step from losing your identity as
This document is available on studocu
Downloaded by Athulya Retnakaran (vkretnakaran No' gmail .com)
a person. People react to this frustration by not acting at all” (RE:generate Communip
Organising: 1s it for me? leaflet)
RE:generate go on to summarise what they see as the core ofAlins 's approach, drawn from
Rules for Radicals:
• As a community organizer, start from where the u'orld is and not as you would like it to
be
• People are ready to u'ork to change situations and to tackle problems that most affect and
frustrate them. Organise people around issues and problems that are important to them
• People start to change from where they are and from the realip they know’ best. Change
starts in the minds and hearts of the people
(taken from RE:generate Coininunip Organising: Is it for me? leaflet) Alinsky's
ideas are close to those of Freire's illustrated here.
“People only understand things in terms of their experience, u'hich means you must get within
their experience. Further, communication is a two-way process If you tq to get your ideas
across to others u'ithout paying attention to u'hat they have to say to you, you can forget about
the whole thing” (Ledwith, 2005).