Child Rights Andprotection Typography PROJECT
Child Rights Andprotection Typography PROJECT
Child Rights Andprotection Typography PROJECT
in India?
Historically we have witnessed a sea change in laws, policies and the
recognition of human rights and child rights. We have moved from common
law doctrines, which unfortunately favoured the powerful, to a rights-based
approach. Whatever welfare happened to vulnerable communities, including
their children, depending on the dominant sections of society’s generosity and
mercy. The Constitution of India, which came into effect on 26th January 1950,
guarantees children’s rights. Article 21-A guarantees the right to free and
compulsory elementary education for all children in the age group 6-14 years.
Article 24 (a) secures the right to be protected from any hazardous
employment until 14 years. Further children have equal rights as all other adult
citizens of India. Few among them are right to equality (Article 14), right to
personal liberty and the process of law (Article 21), right to being protected
from being trafficked and forced into bonded labour (Article 23) etc. Child
protection laws in India are framed in line with constitutional provisions for
safeguarding child rights. More than 250 statutes in India, passed by the Union
and State Governments, deal with children. In addition to these child
protection laws, we have several criminal laws which give protection to
children. These statutes include the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Evidence
Act, 1872 and Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
The raw act in the Constitution that was amended in the year 2016
can be stated as:
Short Title: The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Long Title: An Act to protect children from offences of sexual assault, sexual
harassment and pornography and provide for establishment of
Special Courts for trial of such offences and for matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto.
However, such a measure had drawbacks since the IPC could not
effectively protect the child due to various loopholes like:
IPC 375 doesn’t protect male victims or anyone from sexual acts of
penetration other than “traditional” peno-vaginal intercourse.
IPC 354 lacks a statutory definition of “modesty”. It carries a weak
penalty and is a compoundable offence. Further, it does not
protect the “modesty” of a male child.
In IPC 377, the term “unnatural offences” is not defined. It only
applies to victims penetrated by their attacker’s sex act and is not
designed to criminalise sexual abuse of children.