Yr3 B2 PBSet1
Yr3 B2 PBSet1
Yr3 B2 PBSet1
Caroline Terquem
Problem set 1
Symmetries
a) Show that the action for a free particle is not conserved under this transformation.
However, show that the variation δL of the Lagrangian under this transformation is
a total time derivative, which ensures the transformation is a symmetry.
b) The version of Noether’s theorem derived in the lectures applies when the action
is conserved. For t′ = t, this requires δL = const. Now, consider an infinitesimal
transformation qi (t) → qi′ (t′ ) = qi (t) + ϵηi (qk , t) and t′ = t, such that δL is not
constant but equals ϵdf /dt, where L (qi , q̇i , t) and f (qi , t). Show that this leads to
another form of Noether’s theorem:
X ∂L
ηi − f = const.
∂ q̇i
i
c) Apply this result to the case of a Galilean transformation for a system of N particles.
1
b) Use Noether’s theorem, as established in Problem 2, to show that the following
vector, known as the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector, is a constant of motion:
A = p×L − kmr̂,
where p is the momentum and r̂ is the unit vector in the radial direction. This is a
useful result, as the equation of planetary motion can be derived directly from the
fact that A is constant.
Consider a Lagrangian density L that depends on a field ϕ(r, t), its time derivative ∂t ϕ
and its spatial derivatives ∂i ϕ, but not explicitly on r or t. The action over an arbitrary
spatial domain Ω and between arbitrary times tA and tB is given by:
ˆ tB ˆ
S= dt dv L (ϕ, ∂t ϕ, ∂i ϕ) ,
tA Ω
b) Conservation of energy and the Hamiltonian: Integrate equation (1) over the entire
volume V of the system. Assuming that the field vanishes at the boundaries, show
that: ˆ
∂L
H≡ dv ∂t ϕ − L = const. (2)
V ∂ (∂t ϕ)
Here, H is the Hamiltonian and represents the total energy of the system, so the
expression within the integrand is an energy density. In light of this result, provide
a physical interpretation of equation (1).
2
Here, ϕ(x, t) represents the displacement of the atom located at x from its equilibrium
position, ρ is the mass density, T is the tension, and V(ϕ) is the potential energy
density.
a) Apply the Euler-Lagrange equations for fields to show that this Lagrangian yields
two of Maxwell’s equations in vacuum. How can the other two Maxwell’s equations
be derived?
b) The results from problem 3 can be generalised to a Lagrangian density that depends
on multiple fields ψk and their derivatives. Invariance under time translation then
yields Noether’s theorem in the form ∂t E + ∂i Si = 0, where:
∂L ∂L
E= ∂t ψk − L, Si = ∂t ψk , (6)
∂ (∂t ψk ) ∂ (∂i ψk )
with summation over k implied. Show that:
ϵ0 1 2
E= E+ B − ϵ0 ∇ · (ϕE) .
2 2µ0
The last term is a divergence, representing a flux of energy through a surface when
a volume integral is carried out, and therefore should belong to the flux ∂i Si rather
than the energy density E. Recall that E was derived from the definition of H,
which is an integral over the entire space, under the assumption that divergence
terms do not contribute, as the fields were assumed to vanish at the boundaries.
To remove this term from the energy density, we can apply a gauge transformation
ϕ → ϕ̃ = ϕ − ∂t Γ and A → Ã = A + ∇Γ, where we choose the function Γ such that
∂t Γ = ϕ, i.e. ϕ̃ = 0 (this is called the Weyl, or temporal, gauge). Show that E and
B are invariant under this gauge transformation.
Using the fields ϕ̃ and à as variables for the Lagrangian density, show that:
ϵ0 1 2 1
E= E+ B and S = E×B.
2 2µ0 µ0
3
Problem 5: Lagrangian for the Schrödinger equation
Show that, if ψ and ψ ⋆ are treated as two independent field variables, the Lagrangian
density:
h2 ih ⋆
L = 2 ∇ψ · ∇ψ ⋆ + V ψψ ⋆ − (ψ ∂t ψ − ψ∂t ψ ⋆ ) ,
8π m 4π
leads to the Schrödinger equation:
−h2 2 ih
2
∇ ψ+Vψ = ∂t ψ.
8π m 2π
Calculate the energy density.