The Mechanism of Alkali Doping in CSPBBR: A First-Principles Perspective
The Mechanism of Alkali Doping in CSPBBR: A First-Principles Perspective
The Mechanism of Alkali Doping in CSPBBR: A First-Principles Perspective
CrossMark
View Export
Online Citation
Xuyang Zhang,1 Qingwei Ma,1 Ruiping Li,1 Changqing Lin,2 Dan Huang,2,a) and Yingchun Cheng1,a)
AFFILIATIONS
1
Key Laboratory of Flexible Electronics (KLOFE) & Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation
Center for Advanced Materials (SICAM), Nanjing Tech University (NanjingTech), 30 South Puzhu Road, Nanjing 211816, China
2
Guangxi Key Laboratory for Relativistic Astrophysics, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Novel Energy Materials
and Related Technology, Guangxi Novel Battery Materials Research Center of Engineering Technology, School of Physical
Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
a)
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] and [email protected]
ABSTRACT
All-inorganic CsPbBr3 perovskite doped with alkali metal atoms has been attracting increasing attention due to its superior optoelectronic
properties. However, there still exists significant uncertainty regarding the doping mechanism. One view of the mechanism is that alkali
CALCULATION METHOD where εα(q/q0 ) is the charge transition energy level of defect α
All calculations are carried out by using the Vienna between charge states q and q0 . Ef(α,q) is the formation energy of
ab initio simulation package (VASP).30 The core-valence inter- defect α in charge state q.
action is described by a projector-augmented-wave (PAW)31
method, and the exchange-correction interactions are described RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
by the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)32 functional. The van
Orthorhombic CsPbBr3 in the Pmnb space group34
der Waals interactions are described by the Grimme DFT-D3
(ICSD-28312) is used for defect calculations. The crystal structure
approach.33 A cutoff energy of 500 eV is used. A 4 × 2 × 1
is shown in Fig. 1(a). The optimized lattice constants are
supercell containing 160 atoms is used for the defect calcula-
a = 4.61 Å, b = 9.90 Å, and c = 17.14 Å, which are consistent with
tions. All structures are optimized until the residual force is
experimental results (a = 4.60 Å, b = 9.72 Å, c = 16.81 Å).35 Various
below 0.01 eV/Å, and the convergence threshold of electronic
point defects are simulated within a 4 × 2 × 1 CsPbBr3 supercell,
energy is set to 10−5 eV.
which is large enough to prevent defect interactions. Taking Li
The formation energy Ef(α,q) of a defect α ionized to a charge
doping as an example, a series of Li-related impurity point defects
state q is determined as
are created, including LiCs (Cs substituted by Li), LiPb (Pb substi-
X tuted by Li), LiBr (Br substituted by Li), and Lii (interstitial Li).
Ef (α, q) ¼ E(α, q) E( perfect) i
ni (Δμi þ μsolid
i ) To grow high-quality CsPbBr3 crystals, it is vital to control the
chemical potentials of various elements.36–38 All nine phases, con-
þ q(EF þ EVBM ): (1) sisting of Cs, Pb, and Br elements, are investigated, with the results
shown in Table S1 in the supplementary material. The chemical
Ef(α,q) is a function of both the electron Fermi energy EF potential range in the purple area of Fig. 1(b) indicates the thermo-
and relative chemical potential Δμi. E(α,q) is the total energy of dynamic stability of CsPbBr3. In other words, the point (ΔμCs,
the supercell, including that of α. E(perfect) is the total energy of ΔμPb, ΔμBr) in the purple area is the optimum chemical potential
pristine supercell. ni is the number of atoms of type i added condition for growing CsPbBr3 crystals. The purple area is a
(ni > 0) or removed (ni < 0) from the perfect crystal supercell narrow quadrilateral, indicating that the chemical potentials of the
when a defect α is created. Δμi is the relative chemical potential various elements should be carefully controlled when growing
of element i, and μsolid iis the chemical potential of the elemen- CsPbBr3. The critical points of the purple area (points D, E, F, and
tal solids consisting of element i. EF is the Fermi energy and G), as well as their corresponding chemical potential values, are
FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of CsPbBr3 in the space group Pmnb. (b) Chemical potential range for growing CsPbBr3 crystals.
As the Li doping of CsPbBr3 has been widely experimentally defects are very high, indicating difficulty of formation. Under
investigated,21,22,24 we too examine this type of doping. In order to point C conditions, the formation energies of LiCs and LiPb are rela-
find out which lattice site Li prefers, we calculated the formation tively low, thus these two point defects form relatively easily.
energy of Li-related point defects according to Eq. (1). Three chem- Figures 2(a)–2(c) show that the slope of Lii or LiBr is positive
ical potential points (points A, B, and C) in Fig. 1(b) are selected. within the band gap, indicating that Lii and LiBr behave as donors
The chemical potential values of these points are listed in Table S2 and induce n-type conductivity. Similarly, LiPb behaves as an accep-
in the supplementary material, and the chemical potential of Li is tor and induces p-type conductivity. LiCs is an isoelectronic doping
shown in Table S3 in the supplementary material. Figures 2(a)–2(c) which will not introduce excess carriers. If Lii and LiPb simultane-
show the formation energies of Li-related point defects under point ously form in CsPbBr3, there will be a compensation effect between
A, B, and C chemical potential conditions, respectively. Under the two point defects, leading to reduced doping efficiency. To
point A and B conditions, the formation energies of all four point improve the p-type conductivity of CsPbBr3, we expect that more
FIG. 2. (a)–(c) Formation energies of various point defects in Li-doped CsPbBr3 under different chemical potential conditions. (a), (b), and (c) correspond to the chemical
potential conditions of A, B, and C points in Fig. 1(b) respectively. (d) Defect charge transition energy levels in Li-doped CsPbBr3.
efforts should be made to dope Li into Pb sites. Figures 2(a)–2(c) acceptor level at 0.31 eV above the valence band maximum,
show a comparison of the formation energies of LiPb under three which is a relatively shallow level; and Lii introduces a donor
different chemical potential positions; point C is the best chemical level at 0.08 eV below the conduction band minimum, which is
potential condition for the p-type doping of CsPbBr3. also a shallow level. The formation energy of LiBr is so high that
A defect transition between different charge states plays an LiBr forms with great difficulty. Therefore, Li doping mainly
important role in the electrical properties of a host material.44–50 introduces shallow levels within the band gap, conducive to
The defect charge transition levels of Li-related point defects are improving the electrical conductivity of CsPbBr3. Because the
shown in Fig. 2(d). The lines represent impurity transition levels, radius of Na is similar to that of Li, the scenario of Na doping in
and the solid/hollow points represent donor/acceptor defects. (0/−) CsPbBr3 is similar to that of Li doping, as shown in Fig. S1 in the
represents εα(0/−1), that is, the transition level between charge supplementary material.
states 0 and −1. LiCs is an isoelectronic doping, which does not The radii of K and Rb are much larger than those of Li and
change its charge states with Fermi energy. LiPb introduces an Na, and similar to that of Cs. Here, we take K as an example to
FIG. 3. (a)–(c) Formation energies of various point defects in K-doped CsPbBr3 under different chemical potential conditions. (a), (b), and (c) correspond to the chemical
potential conditions of A, B, and C points in Fig. 1(b) respectively. (d) Defect charge transition energy levels in K-doped CsPbBr3.
investigate doping effects in CsPbBr3. Figures 3(a)–3(c) show the radius on the doping site. Therefore, to determine the alkali doping
formation energies of K-related point defects under point A, B, and site, one should consider the chemical potential of the synthesis
C chemical potential conditions, respectively. The chemical poten- conditions, dopant valence state, and the atomic radius.
tial of K is shown in Table S5 in the supplementary material.
Because of its large atomic radius, it is difficult for the K atom to CONCLUSIONS
perform interstitial doping in CsPbBr3. Under point A conditions,
In summary, we investigate the mechanism of alkali metal
the formation energies of all three point defects are very high, indi-
atoms doping in CsPbBr3 using first-principles calculations. By
cating difficulty in formation of the defects. Under point B condi-
evaluating the chemical potential range for CsPbBr3 crystal growth,
tions, the formation energy of KCs is relatively low, so K tend to
we find two precursor groups for growing CsPbBr3 (PbBr2 and
replace Cs in CsPbBr3. Under point C conditions, the formation
Cs4PbBr6; PbBr2 and CsBr). Alkali metal atoms energetically prefer
energies of KCs and KPb are relatively low, thus both KCs and KPb
to replace Cs or Pb atoms in CsPbBr3 crystals. Cs replaced by alkali
can form.
is isoelectronic doping, and Pb substituted by alkali is p-type
The slopes of the formation energies of various point defects
doping. For Li (or Na) doping, Lii is n-type doping, which will
shown in Figs. 3(a)–3(c) indicate that KBr behaves as a donor and
compensate holes induced by LiPb. For K (or Rb) doping, there are
KPb as an acceptor. KCs is an isoelectronic doping which will not
no n-type point defects compensating holes induced by KPb.
introduce excess carriers. In contrast with the Li doping shown in
Therefore, K doping and Rb doping are efficient ways to improve
Fig. 2, it is difficult to produce K interstitial doping. Because no
the p-type conductivity of CsPbBr3 than Li doping or Na doping.
n-type point defects can compensate with KPb, K doping is a more
Moreover, by comparing the formation energies of various point
efficient way than Li doping to improve the p-type conductivity of
defects under different chemical potential conditions, point C in
CsPbBr3. To obtain this improvement, more efforts should be
Fig. 1(b) proves to be the best condition for the p-type doping of
made to dope K into Pb sites. Figures 3(a)–3(c) show that the for-
CsPbBr3. Alkali metal atoms doping mainly introduce shallow
mation energy of KPb decreases, so point C is the best chemical
levels within the band gap, conducive to improving the p-type con-
potential condition for the p-type doping of CsPbBr3. Figure 3(d)
ductivity of CsPbBr3.
shows the defect charge transition levels of K-related point defects.
KCs is an isoelectronic doping and will not change its charge states
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
with Fermi energy variation. KPb introduces an acceptor level at
0.31 eV above valence band maximum, indicating the KPb defect See supplementary material for impure phases that may form
state comprises a relatively shallow doping. KBr forms with great during CsPbBr3 growth as well as corresponding chemical potential
thermal stability for efficient solar cells,” Adv. Energy Mater. 6(8), 1502458 of halide perovskites with Ion intercalation,” ACS Nano 11(1), 1073–1079
(2016). (2017).
5
R. E. Beal, D. J. Slotcavage, T. Leijtens, A. R. Bowring, R. A. Belisle, 22
Q. Jiang, X. Zeng, N. Wang, Z. Xiao, Z. Guo, and J. Lu, “Electrochemical
W. H. Nguyen, G. F. Burkhard, E. T. Hoke, and M. D. McGehee, “Cesium lead lithium doping induced property changes In halide perovskite CsPbBr3 crystal,”
halide perovskites with improved stability for tandem solar cells,” J. Phys. Chem. ACS Energy Lett. 3(1), 264–269 (2018).
Lett. 7(5), 746–751 (2016). 23
G. Shao, S. Liu, L. Ding, Z. Zhang, W. Xiang, and X. Liang, “KxCs1-xPbBr3
6
C. Yi, J. Luo, S. Meloni, A. Boziki, N. Ashari-Astani, C. Gratzel, NCs glasses possessing super optical properties and stability for white light emit-
S. M. Zakeeruddin, U. Rothlisberger, and M. Gratzel, “Entropic stabilization of ting diodes,” Chem. Eng. J. 375, 122031 (2019).
mixed A-cation ABX3 metal halide perovskites for high performance perovskite 24
Y. Li, J. Duan, H. Yuan, Y. Zhao, B. He, and Q. Tang, “Lattice modulation of
solar cells,” Energy Environ. Sci. 9(2), 656–662 (2016). alkali metal cations doped Cs1-xRxPbBr3 halides for inorganic perovskite solar
7
Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Duan, X. Yang, and Q. Tang, “Divalent hard Lewis acid cells,” Sol. RRL 2(10), 1800164 (2018).
25
doped CsPbBr3 films for 9.63%-efficiency and ultra-stable all-inorganic perov- R. Zhang, Y. Yuan, J. Li, Z. Qin, Q. Zhang, B. Xiong, Z. Wang, F. Chen, X. Du,
skite solar cells,” J. Mater. Chem. A 7(12), 6877–6882 (2019). and W. Yang, “Ni and K ion doped CsPbX3 NCs for the improvement of lumi-
8
R. Begum, M. R. Parida, A. L. Abdelhady, B. Murali, N. M. Alyami, nescence properties by a facile synthesis method in ambient Air,” J. Lumin. 221,
G. H. Ahmed, M. N. Hedhili, O. M. Bakr, and O. F. Mohammed, “Engineering 117044 (2020).
26
interfacial charge transfer in CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals by heterovalent H. Zhang, R. Yuan, M. Jin, Z. Zhang, Y. Yu, W. Xiang, and X. Liang,
doping,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(2), 731–737 (2017). “Rb+-doped CsPbBr3 quantum dots with multi-color stabilized in
9
J. Yin, G. H. Ahmed, O. M. Bakr, J. -L. Bredas, and O. F. Mohammed, borosilicate glass via crystallization,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 40(1), 94–102
“Unlocking the effect of trivalent metal doping in all-inorganic CsPbBr3 perov- (2020).
skite,” ACS Energy Lett. 4(3), 789–795 (2019). 27
J. Li, X. Du, G. Niu, H. Xie, Y. Chen, Y. Yuan, Y. Gao, H. Xiao, J. Tang,
10
Z. -L. Yu, Y. -Q. Zhao, Q. Wan, B. Liu, J. -L. Yang, and M. -Q. Cai, A. Pan, and B. Yang, “Rubidium doping to enhance carrier transport in CsPbBr3
“Theoretical study on the effect of the optical properties and electronic structure single crystals for high-performance x-ray detection,” ACS Appl. Mater.
for the Bi-doped CsPbBr3,” J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 32(20), 205504 (2020). Interfaces 12(1), 989–996 (2020).
11 28
G. Huang, C. Wang, S. Xu, S. Zong, J. Lu, Z. Wang, C. Lu, and Y. Cui, S. Li, Z. Shi, F. Zhang, L. Wang, Z. Ma, D. Yang, Z. Yao, D. Wu, T. -T. Xu,
“Postsynthetic doping of MnCl2 molecules into preformed CsPbBr3 perovskite Y. Tian, Y. Zhang, C. Shan, and X. J. Li, “Sodium doping-enhanced emission
nanocrystals via a halide exchange-driven cation exchange,” Adv. Mater. 29(29), efficiency and stability of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals for white light-emitting devices,”
1700095 (2017). Chem. Mater. 31(11), 3917–3928 (2019).
12
D. Parobek, Y. Dong, T. Qiao, and D. Son, “Direct hot-injection synthesis 29
P. Todorovic, D. Ma, B. Chen, R. Quintero-Bermudez, M. I. Saidaminov,
of Mn-doped CsPbBr3 nanocrystals,” Chem. Mater. 30(9), 2939–2944 Y. Dong, Z. -H. Lu, and E. H. Sargent, “Spectrally tunable and stable electrolumi-
(2018). nescence enabled by rubidium doping of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals,” Adv. Opt.
13
F. Li, Z. Xia, Y. Gong, L. Gu, and Q. Liu, “Optical properties of Mn2+ doped Mater. 7(24), 1901440 (2019).
46
spontaneous emission and lasing form colloidal nanocrystals of caesium lead X. L. Wu, Y. F. Mei, G, G. Siu, K. L. Wong, K. Moulding, M. J. Stokes,
halide perovskites,” Nat. Commun. 6, 8056 (2015). C. L. Fu, and X. M. Bao, “Spherical growth and surface-quasifree vibrations of Si
41
M. Kulbak, D. Cahen, and G. Hodes, “How important Is the organic part of nanocrystallites in Er-doped Si nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(14),
lead halide perovskite photovoltaic cells? efficient CsPbBr3 cells,” J. Phys. Chem. 3000–3003 (2001).
Lett. 6(13), 2452–2456 (2015). 47
X. L. Wu, S. J. Xiong, G. G. Siu, G. S. Huang, Y. F. Mei, Z. Y. Zhang,
42
M. Kulbak, S. Gupta, N. Kedem, I. Levine, T. Bendikov, G. Hodes, and S. S. Deng, and C. Tan, “Optical emission from excess Si defect centers in Si
D. Cahen, “Cesium enhances long-term stability of lead bromide perovskite- nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(15), 157402 (2003).
based solar cells,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(1), 167–172 (2016). 48
H. T. Chen, S. J. Xiong, X. L. Wu, J. Zhu, J. C. Shen, and P. Chu, “Tin oxide
43
A. F. Akbulatov, L. A. Frolova, N. N. Dremova, I. Zhidkov, V. M. Martynenko, nanoribbons with vacancy structures in luminescence-sensitive oxygen sensing,”
S. A. Tsarev, S. Y. Luchkin, E. Z. Kurniaev, S. M. Aldoshin, K. J. Stevenson, and Nano Lett. 9(5), 1926–1931 (2009).
P. A. Troshin, “Light or heat: What is killing lead halide perovskites under solar 49
X. L. Wu, S. J. Xiong, J. Zhu, J. Wang, J. C. Shen, and P. K. Chu,
cell operation conditions?,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11(1), 333–339 (2020). “Identification of surface structures on 3C-SiC nanocrystals with hydrogen
44
C. Persson, Y. -J. Zhao, S. Lany, and A. Zunger, “N-type doping of CuInSe2 and hydroxyl bonding by photoluminescence,” Nano Lett. 9(12), 4053–4060
and CuGaSe2,” Phys. Rev. B 72(3), 035211 (2005). (2009).
45
S. -H. Wei, “Overcoming the doping bottleneck in semiconductors,” Comput. 50
J. Fan, X. Wu, and T. Qiu, “Experimental evidence for quantum confinement
Mater. Sci. 30(3), 337–348 (2004). in 3C-SiC nanoparticles,” Physics 34(8), 570–572 (2005).