S.NO PARTICULARS PAGE NO.

1. INTRODUCTION

SUPPLY SIDE OF PRIVATE EQUITY AND

VENTURE CAPITAL
2.

PRIVATE EQUITY AND VENTURE CAPITAL:

LEGAL AND STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW
3.

4.

1
 Introduction
Private Equity (PE) investments have become an important part of India's financial ecosystem,
providing critical capital and strategic support to businesses at various stages of their growth journey.
From nascent startups to established corporations, PE firms offer a diverse range of investment
solutions, including venture capital, growth capital, buyouts, and distressed investments.
The regulatory landscape for PE investments in India is primarily governed by the Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) through the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012.
PE funds are classified as a type of Alternative Investment Fund (AIF), subject to specific compliance
and reporting obligations to ensure transparency and protect investor interests.
Additionally, the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999, and regulations issued by the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) play a vital role in governing foreign investment in India, including PE
investments. These regulations outline guidelines for foreign investors, covering aspects such as
investment caps, repatriation of funds, and operational requirements.

Types of Private Equity Investments in India

India's dynamic private equity (PE) landscape offers a diverse range of investment strategies catering
to businesses at various stages of their growth journey.

Growth Capital
Growth capital investments provide funding to established companies seeking to expand operations,
enter new markets, or make strategic acquisitions. This strategy enables businesses to scale without
significantly diluting ownership.
Buyouts
Buyouts, particularly Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs), involve acquiring a controlling stake in a company,
often financed through debt. These transactions are governed by the Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI
regulations. Buyouts are a strategic tool for investors to implement operational improvements and
corporate restructuring.
Venture Capital
Venture Capital (VC) investments focus on early-stage companies with high growth potential. SEBI's
Venture Capital Funds Regulations, 1996, provide a structured framework for investors and startups.
VC investments fuel innovation and entrepreneurship, fostering the development of new technologies
and economic growth.
Mezzanine Financing
Mezzanine financing is a hybrid instrument combining debt and equity features. It offers investors the
right to convert debt into equity in case of default. This strategy is governed by the Indian Contract
Act, 1872, and specific contractual agreements. Mezzanine financing provides a balance between risk
and reward, making it a valuable tool for companies in transition or seeking growth without
significant equity dilution.

2
The Process of Private Equity Transactions in India
The journey of a private equity (PE) transaction in India involves a series of critical steps, from initial
deal sourcing to the eventual exit. Each stage requires careful consideration of strategic, financial, and
legal factors, all within the framework of Indian regulations.

The PE Investment Lifecycle

1. Deal Sourcing: PE firms identify potential investment opportunities through a variety of
channels, including industry networks, investment bankers, and direct outreach.
2. Preliminary Assessment: A preliminary assessment is conducted to evaluate the target
company's potential, growth prospects, and alignment with the PE firm's investment thesis.
3. Detailed Due Diligence: A comprehensive due diligence process is undertaken to validate the
company's financial, legal standing, operational efficiency, and market position.
4. Valuation and Deal Structuring: The valuation of the target company is determined using
various techniques, such as Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis, Comparable Company
Analysis, and Precedent Transactions Analysis. The deal structure, including the investment
amount, ownership stake, and exit strategy, is then negotiated.
5. Negotiation and Documentation: The terms of the investment are negotiated, and legal
documents, such as the investment agreement, shareholder agreements, and other relevant
contracts, are drafted and executed.
6. Closing and Monitoring: The transaction is finalized, and the PE firm actively monitors the
portfolio company's performance, providing strategic guidance, financial oversight, and
operational support.
7. Exit: The PE firm aims to realize its investment through various exit strategies, including
Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), strategic sales, secondary buyouts, or buybacks by the original
owners.

Key Considerations in PE Transactions

 Financial Due Diligence: Thorough examination of financial statements, tax compliance, and
financial projections.
 Legal Due Diligence: Review of contracts, legal disputes, regulatory compliance (e.g.,
FEMA for cross-border transactions, Companies Act for corporate governance), and
intellectual property rights.
 Operational Due Diligence: Assessment of the company's operations, market position, and
competitive landscape.
By carefully navigating these stages and addressing the specific challenges of the Indian market, PE
firms can successfully invest in and support the growth of Indian businesses.

3
Factors Driving Private Equity Investment in India
India's emergence as a global economic powerhouse has been fuelled by significant inflows of private
equity (PE) investment. Several key factors have contributed to this trend, making India an attractive
destination for PE firms worldwide.
Government Initiatives and Policy Support the Indian government has taken several proactive steps to
create a conducive environment for PE investments. Key initiatives include:

 Liberalization of FDI Policies: The relaxation of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) norms,
particularly in sectors like defence, telecom, and insurance, has opened up new avenues for
PE investment. This has enabled foreign investors to acquire significant stakes in Indian
companies.
 Ease of Doing Business Reforms: The government's continuous efforts to streamline
business processes, reduce bureaucratic hurdles, and improve regulatory efficiency have
significantly enhanced the ease of doing business in India. These reforms have made it easier
for companies to establish and operate businesses, attracting both domestic and foreign
investors.
 Startup India Initiative: This initiative has fostered a vibrant startup ecosystem in India,
encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship. By providing various incentives and support
programs, the government has stimulated venture capital investment in early-stage startups.
 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016: The implementation of the IBC has
significantly improved the resolution of corporate insolvency, providing a more efficient and
timely process for recovering debts. This has instilled confidence in lenders and investors,
making it easier to finance businesses and recover investments.
 Goods and Services Tax (GST): The introduction of GST has unified the tax system across
India, reducing compliance costs and improving the ease of doing business. This has made it
easier for companies to operate across different states, attracting investments and boosting
economic growth.
By implementing these reforms, the Indian government has created a favourable investment climate,
attracted substantial PE investment and propelling the country's economic growth.

Innovative Funding Structures in Indian Private Equity

Private equity (PE) funds in India are increasingly adopting innovative funding structures to optimize
returns and manage risk. These structures offer flexibility and diversification, making Indian PE
investments more attractive to global investors.

 Structured Equity: This hybrid approach combines debt-like features with equity options. It
provides investors with a lower-risk alternative to pure equity investments, offering a balance
of fixed income and growth potential.
 Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) with Equity Warrants: This structure offers a dual
benefit: a fixed income stream from the NCDs and the potential for equity upside through the
warrants. This allows investors to participate in the company's growth while mitigating
downside risk.

4
  Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs): Although relatively new in India, SPACs
are gaining traction. They provide a streamlined path to public markets for private companies,
offering a unique investment opportunity for PE funds.

The Future of Private Equity in India

India's PE landscape is undergoing a transformation, driven by several factors:
 Technological Advancements: The focus on technology-driven startups, renewable energy,
and healthcare reflects India's commitment to innovation and sustainability.
 Government Initiatives: The government's Digital India initiative and supportive FDI
policies are creating favourable conditions for PE investments in sectors like fintech, edtech,
and e-commerce.
 Regulatory Reforms: The introduction of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and
SEBI's reforms have improved the ease of doing business and enhanced foreign investment
flows.
These trends are expected to further fuel the growth of the Indian PE industry, making it an attractive
destination for global investors. The size of the Indian market is a motivational factor. India's market,
compared to any other countries' market, when measuring markets solely by population has a major
advantage as the number of people living in India is high. Although the Indian market is less
developed in comparison to most countries, we have still garnered a lot of interest from international
companies and investors over the years. Despite being far smaller, India's GDP has grown rapidly
establishing the possibility of a new centre for private equity investments.
Since it recognises the Private Equity market's potential, the Indian government is also taking a
number of steps to support market growth and promote international investment in the country such as
the Small Industries Development Bank of India, a government-run fund of funds, invests in start-ups
indirectly to promote entrepreneurship. The government's support for the market not only boosts
economic activity through subsidies, but it also gives foreign investors a stronger feeling of market
stability since it gives them more confidence to see the government actively participating in the
market. The promoters' post-IPO investment lock-in duration was also reduced by SEBI to 18 months,
making it easier for firm owners to wind down their activities. Entrepreneurs are more ready to accept
private equity offers since there are fewer exit barriers, which accelerates the number and velocity of
deals in the PE market as a whole.
Private equity investments in India have shot-up nearly tenfold in just ten years. Private equity in
India has experienced phenomenal development over the years, Despite the likelihood that this value
will level as the market matures, investments have increased and this trend is now continuing.

5
 Venture capital
The Indian venture capital (VC) industry has its roots dating back to 1973 with the establishment of
the Risk Capital Foundation. However, comprehensive data on investment activity is only accessible
from the financial year 1999-2000 onwards. While there are fragmented data points from the Indian
Venture Capital Association and annual reports of various active funds during this period, these
sources lack consistency, hindering their integration with other publicly available data. This time
frame, 1999 to 2016, marks a period of significant growth, deepening, and broadening of the VC
industry, accompanied by substantial evolution in investment practices.

The Evolution of India's Venture Capital Industry

India's venture capital (VC) industry has its origins in the government's early endeavours to provide
risk capital, such as the establishment of the Risk Capital Foundation. Subsequent initiatives like the
Technology Development Fund (TDF) and the Programme for Advancement of Commercial
Technology (PACT) further fuelled the growth of risk funding.
The emergence of institutional VC is often linked to the formation of the Technology Development
and Information Company of India, a joint venture between ICICI Bank and the Unit Trust of India.
This marked a significant milestone in the industry's development.
The industry's evolution can be broadly divided into four phases:
1. Early Phase: Dominated by domestic fund management entities, many of which were state-
owned.
2. Internationalization Phase: Characterized by the entry of foreign funds, exemplified by
William Draper III's establishment of Draper International.
3. Maturation Phase: Increased participation of international players.
4. Rationalization and Revival Phase: Post-technology boom period, marked by industry
consolidation and renewed interest in India's high-growth sectors.
This paper delves into the industry's developments from 1999 onwards, when it began attracting a
diverse range of international investors.

Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV

Pre-1995 1995-97 1998-2001 2002-2005
Total Funds: ($ m) 30 125 2847 5239
Number of Funds 8 20 50 75
Primary Stages Seed, Early-stage Development Early-stage Growth/Maturity
and Sectors and Development – Diversified and – Diversified
– Development
Diversified –
Telecom & IT
Primary Sources of World Bank, Government Overseas Overseas Institutional
Funds Government Institutional

6
The Supply Side of PE and VC
To analyse investment activity from the perspective of PE and VC funds, we examined 849 funds that
were active during the study period. These funds made 8,884 individual investment transactions,
including 792 transactions with undisclosed investors. Fund management organizations typically
manage multiple funds, so we tracked investment activity at the organization level rather than the
individual fund level.
These investments were made in 3,699 startup enterprises, involving 6,044 funding rounds and
resulting in 6,313 enterprise-fund relationships. Notably, 1,195 companies received multiple rounds of
financing.
This data provides valuable insights into the volume and nature of VC and PE activity in India.
Despite data limitations, the sheer scale of investment activity offers significant opportunities for
academic research.

Number of Investments made by VC and PE funds

Mean 7.42
Median 3.00
SD 14.30
Max 169.00
Min 1.00

VC and PE firms are often characterized as small, tightly-knit teams of like-minded professionals.
This is due, in part, to the intensive oversight required to effectively manage investment portfolios.
Industry practitioners suggest that a partner should ideally manage no more than six active
investments at once.
Historically, VC and PE was largely a localized industry. However, the industry has increasingly
internationalized. As the cost of human capital has risen for both funds and portfolio companies, the
capital committed to individual investments has also increased. To manage this growth, fund
management organizations have gradually expanded their teams, raised successive funds and adding
partners to accommodate their growing portfolios.
The data reveals that a substantial portion of VC and PE funds in India have relatively modest
investment portfolios. A significant 580 funds have made five or fewer investments, while only 69
funds have exceeded the 20-investment mark, a threshold typically associated with a well-established
fund management team of at least four partners. Furthermore, a mere 19 funds have achieved a
portfolio size of 50 investments, a benchmark often used to signify a substantial market presence.
This pattern suggests several potential explanations:

1. High Fund Churn: A considerable number of funds may have ceased operations after
deploying their initial capital, limiting their ability to raise subsequent funds and undertake
further investments. This trend has implications for both aspiring fund managers and Limited
Partners (LPs), the investors in VC and PE funds.

7
 2. Geographic Focus: Some funds may have been part of larger regional funds with a broader
investment mandate. Once they had exhausted their allocation for India, they may have
shifted their focus to other geographies.
3. Opportunistic Investing: A significant portion of funds may have made opportunistic
investments in India, lacking a long-term strategic commitment to the country.
To gain a deeper understanding of this phenomenon, it is essential to analyse the entry and exit rates
of funds in the Indian market. The data presented in Table provides insights into the number of funds
making their first and last investments each year.

Entry and Exit of PE and VC Funds

First Last
First Last
Investment Investment Drop
Investment Investment
Year Cumulative Cumulative Out Rate
1998 20 0 20 0
1999 16 0 36 0
2000 30 2 66 2
2001 17 4 83 6
2002 14 2 97 8 8%
2003 8 0 105 8 8%
2004 26 4 131 12 9%
2005 33 4 164 16 10%
2006 86 10 250 26 10%
2007 97 30 347 56 16%
2008 76 35 423 91 22%
2009 26 23 449 114 25%
2010 40 27 489 141 29%
2011 44 36 533 177 33%
2012 60 59 593 236 40%
2013 40 64 633 300 47%
2014 77 159 710 459
2015 107 198 817 657
2016 33 193 850 850

We use the month and year of a fund's first investment as a proxy for its entry into the Indian market.
In the table above, this is referred to as the "First Investment" year. Similarly, we assume that a fund
has exited the market if it has not made any new investments for two years following its last recorded

8
investment. The month and year of this last investment are denoted as the "Last Investment" year in
the table below.
By cumulating the number of funds entering and exiting the market based on these definitions, we
derive the "First Investment Cumulative" and "Last Investment Cumulative" columns, respectively.
We also analysed several metrics related to the investment and portfolio management activities of
Indian VC and PE fund managers. One such metric is the time elapsed between a fund's first and last
investments, which serves as a proxy for the fund's longevity in the market.
As shown in Table below, the mean duration is 51.8 months, while the median is 34.5 months. This
indicates that fewer than half of the funds remain active for even three years. The high standard
deviation suggests that a few funds have been active for significantly longer periods. This observation
aligns with the earlier finding that a small number of funds have made over 100 investments.
Alternatively, the time elapsed between the first and last investments could be interpreted as the time
taken to fully deploy a fund's capital, assuming all investments were made from a single fund. While
successful fund managers often raise multiple funds, if we consider that many of these organizations
raised only one fund during the study period, the time elapsed would represent the commitment period
for that fund. Given the typical seven or ten-year fund life, fund managers aim to commit their capital
within a four-year period. The median of 34.5 months suggests that more than half of the funds are
able to meet this target.
However, the high standard deviation indicates that some funds may struggle to deploy their capital.
This could be attributed to intense competition for investment opportunities, particularly in a market
with a relatively small universe of investible enterprises. Further research is needed to delve deeper
into the dynamics of competition in the Indian VC and PE market.
Time taken to Invest Funds (in months)

Mean 51.8
Median 34.5
SD 56.6
Max 223.2
Min 0.0

To gain a more accurate understanding of the time taken for funds to deploy capital, we excluded
funds that made only one investment and those with unidentified transactions. These exclusions were
necessary because such funds might have made opportunistic investments without a well-defined
India-focused investment thesis, potentially skewing the data.
As shown in Table below, after these adjustments, the dispersion and skewness of the data decreased,
while the mean duration increased. This suggests that a significant proportion of funds remained
active for over six years. Alternatively, this data could further support the argument that some funds
struggled to deploy their capital.

9
 Time taken to Invest funds, net of funds that made just one investment

Stats Months
Mean 77.6
Median 75.1
SD 52.4
Min 1.0
Max 222.2

We find two competing explanations for the time elapsed between a fund's first and last investment:
1. Fund Longevity: A longer duration may indicate the fund's longevity in the market.
2. Difficulty in Finding Deals: A longer duration could also suggest challenges in finding
suitable investment opportunities due to intense competition.
If the latter explanation is accurate, we would expect a low correlation between the time elapsed and
the number of deals. However, we observe a relatively high correlation of 0.44, suggesting that funds
are able to deploy their capital within the commitment period, despite competitive pressures. This
could be attributed to contractual provisions allowing investors to cancel their contributions.
However, it may also indicate that funds are compelled to invest in less attractive opportunities or at
unfavourable valuations, potentially impacting their overall performance.
VC funds are expected to specialize in specific sectors to enhance their post-investment engagement
with portfolio companies and gain a competitive edge. This specialization is often linked to the high
idiosyncratic risk associated with VC portfolios. At the industry level, while the investment portfolio
appears diversified, with only four sectors (BFSI, Energy, Healthcare & Life Sciences,
Manufacturing, and IT & ITES) accounting for over 5% of the total investments, individual fund
portfolios may exhibit greater concentration.
To assess the degree of portfolio concentration, we calculated the percentage of investments in the
highest-investment sector for funds with ten or more transactions. A high percentage indicates a
specialized investment strategy, while a low percentage suggests a more diversified approach.
Table below summarizes the analysis of portfolio concentration for funds with ten or more
investments. The table reveals a wide range in the number of investments per portfolio, as well as the
number of sectors represented within each portfolio. Despite the relatively small average number of
sectors per portfolio (approximately three), the concentration measure, which represents the
proportion of investments in the largest sector, ranges from 9% to a maximum of 33%. managers.

Portfolio Concentration

Statistic No of Investments No of Sectors Percentage

Mean 33.29 2.91 0.33
Median 19.00 2.30 0.30
Std Devn 37.06 1.91 0.16
Max 281.00 11.80 0.90
Min 10.00 1.00 0.09

10
 Literature Review
According to Subash and Nair (May 2005), while the modern concept of venture capital emerged in
1946 and is now widely practiced globally, venture capital activity has slowed down since 2000. This
may be due to increased risk aversion among investors. A significant portion of global venture capital
investment is directed towards later-stage ventures, with only about 5% allocated to early-stage
opportunities. Despite this trend, the potential of venture capital to stimulate economic growth,
improve living standards, create jobs, and generate government revenue remains recognized
worldwide.
Kumar (June 2003) advocates for a greater focus on early-stage business opportunities, citing the
exceptional returns generated by such investments in the United States. He also suggests that
individual capitalists should adopt a focused investment strategy within a specific technology
segment.
Kumar (March 2006) identify four key factors that venture capitalists consider when screening new
venture proposals:
 Strong and focused venture teams: Successful teams are dedicated to their target markets
and meticulous in their approach.
 Proven experience in risk management: Successful teams have a history of effectively
navigating risk.
 Market-focused strategy: Successful ventures prioritize market share and profitability.
 Risk evaluation skills: A strong ability to assess and respond to risk is crucial for venture
success.
The study highlights that while Indian venture capitalists may not be as enthusiastic about technology-
driven ventures, successful ventures in India often share common characteristics, such as a strong
focus on established markets, meticulous attention to detail, and a proven ability to manage risk.
According to Kumar (May 2004), the Indian venture capital industry has adhered to the traditional
venture capital financing model, with a significant portion of investments allocated to early-stage
funding, including seed, start-up, and early-stage rounds. When making investment decisions, venture
capitalists prioritize specific factors, such as geographic location and ownership structure.
Seed-stage financing is provided to nascent companies to support product development and initial
marketing efforts. These companies may be in the early stages of business setup or may have been
operating for a short period but have not yet reached commercialization.
Kumar (March 2004) emphasizes the importance of focusing on early-stage business opportunities,
citing the substantial returns generated by such investments globally, particularly in the United States.
He recommends that venture capitalists maintain their risk-taking nature, even in challenging
economic conditions. While it may be tempting to pursue less risky opportunities, the essence of
venture capital lies in high-risk, high-reward investments.
Chary (September 2005) notes that extensive research on venture capital finance has aided
practitioners, such as venture capital firms and fund managers, in better understanding its role in
economic development. While numerous studies have examined venture capital and venture capitalist
activities in developed countries, further research is needed to address specific challenges and
opportunities in emerging markets.
Vijayalakshman (January 2006) argue that traditional policy measures, such as tax breaks, are
insufficient to stimulate the growth of the venture capital industry. A more comprehensive approach is

11
required, including a thorough understanding of industry needs, strategic policy frameworks, and
simplified regulatory procedures. Despite the potential benefits, venture capital funds in India are not
even registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). To foster industry growth,
policymakers should consider implementing measures such as simplified exit procedures, increased
transparency, and stronger legal protections for investors.
Kumar (July 2005) highlights the importance of the relationship between venture capitalists and
entrepreneurial teams. Rosenstein (1988) examined this relationship in the context of small and large
firms, finding that board interaction is crucial for small firms but often undermined in larger,
conventional firms. Rosenstein et al. (1993) delved deeper into the role of boards in venture-funded
companies in the US, analysing changes in board size, composition, and control. Their findings
suggest that venture funding often leads to increased board size, indicating greater transparency and
oversight. Lloyd et al. (1995) explored deal structuring, post-investment staging, and co-investment
strategies. The study revealed that while venture capitalists set tight milestones and timelines, they
may inadvertently contribute to delays due to hierarchical structures and a lack of clarity among co-
investors regarding their individual roles in portfolio company development.
Robbie (1997) examined venture capitalist monitoring practices, focusing on performance targets,
monitoring information, and monitoring actions. Through a survey of British Venture Capital
Association members, the study provided valuable insights into these aspects of venture capital. The
findings contributed to the understanding of board of directors' roles in venture-backed companies.
Fried (1998) highlighted the increased involvement of board members in venture-backed firms with
significant ownership stakes, demonstrating the impact of board composition on performance
management.
Mishra (July 2004) reviewed empirical research on venture capital investment evaluation criteria in
developed countries. Zopunidis (1994) provides a comprehensive summary of previous research in
this area. Various methodologies have been employed to identify selection criteria, including simple
rating, construct analysis, verbal protocols, and quantitative models. Additionally, multi-method
approaches have been used to gain a deeper understanding of investment criteria and other aspects of
the investment process, such as deal structuring and divestment.
R Goswami’s study examines the impact of venture capital (VC) investments on the valuations of
privately held firms in India. The research focuses on the period 2007-2015 and utilizes a dataset of
1229 funding rounds sourced from Venture Intelligence. The study employs an OLS regression
analysis to investigate the relationship between VC stake acquisition, fund size, revenue multiple, and
firm valuation.
One key finding is that a higher VC stake is associated with a decrease in firm valuation. This
suggests that promoters may opt to liquidate additional stakes when they perceive the firm's valuation
to have reached its peak. This observation contradicts the conventional wisdom that VC investment
positively influences firm valuations.
Furthermore, the study establishes a positive correlation between revenue multiple and valuation,
indicating that firms with higher revenue multiples tend to be valued more highly. This finding aligns
with existing research on valuation methodologies.
Interestingly, the study challenges the U-shaped relationship between fund size and firm valuation
observed in developed markets. In the Indian context, no such relationship is evident. This suggests
that the impact of fund size on firm valuations may vary across different economic contexts.
Overall, this research contributes to the understanding of the dynamics of VC investment in India. It
provides insights into the factors that influence firm valuations in this emerging market and highlights
the potential complexities of the relationship between VC stake acquisition and firm value.

12
Article: Unveiling Latent Structure of Venture Capital Syndication Networks
Venture capital (VC) firms play a crucial role in fostering innovation and fuelling the growth of
startups. However, the investment decisions of individual VCs are often influenced by collaboration
with other firms through syndication networks. These networks, formed through joint investments in
startups, create a complex web of relationships with underlying patterns and dynamics.
The study, "Unveiling Latent Structure of Venture Capital Syndication Networks," aims to shed light
on these hidden structures. Existing research acknowledges the importance of VC syndication
networks .Studies have explored how these networks impact factors like information sharing,
geographic reach of investments, and even exit strategies for VCs.
However, a gap exists in our understanding of the internal structure of these networks. Current
methods might rely on subjective criteria or predetermined categories to classify VC firms. This can
limit our ability to capture the full spectrum of investment behaviours and interactions.
Key Contribution of the Study:
This study proposes a novel approach to address this gap. The authors introduce the iterative Loubar
method based on the Lorenz curve. This method allows for objective classification of VC
institutions within the syndication network. Unlike traditional methods, it avoids the need for pre-
defined categories or arbitrary thresholds.
By analysing the distribution of investment activities, the Loubar method can identify distinct groups
of VCs based on factors like activity level and risk tolerance. This categorization provides valuable
insights into the heterogeneity of VC firms within the syndication network.
Furthermore, the study goes beyond classification by exploring the latent structure of these
relationships. Network embedding techniques are utilized to uncover hidden patterns within the
network. By analysing the embedded representations of VCs, the research aims to identify:
 Influential players: VC firms with a central position in the network likely play a significant
role in deal flow and information dissemination.
 Emerging trends: Identifying how VCs connect with each other can reveal evolving
collaboration patterns and potential areas of future investment focus.
 Potential territories: The study explores the possibility of "territories" within the network,
where certain top-ranked VCs dominate specific investment areas.
Significance of the Research:
This research holds significant value for both VCs and the broader entrepreneurial ecosystem. By
understanding the objective classification of VC firms and their investment behaviours,
entrepreneurs can target fundraising strategies towards VCs with a better fit for their needs.
Additionally, the insights into network structure can help them identify potential partners and
collaborators within the VC landscape.
For VCs, the study provides valuable knowledge to refine their investment strategies.
Understanding their position within the network and the behaviour of different VC categories allows
for more informed decision-making. Furthermore, the identification of emerging trends and potential
collaborators can assist VCs in navigating the ever-evolving landscape of venture capital.
Overall, "Unveiling Latent Structure of Venture Capital Syndication Networks" offers a novel
approach to understanding the complex dynamics of VC collaboration. By objectively

13
classifying VCs and uncovering hidden structures within the network, the research provides
valuable insights for both VCs and entrepreneurs, ultimately contributing to a more efficient
and effective venture capital ecosystem.
The article "Amortizing Volatility Across Private Capital Investments" delves into the
complexities of managing risk in private capital investments. These investments, often characterized
by their illiquid nature and long-term horizon, are inherently volatile. Private capital managers employ
various strategies to mitigate this volatility, including strategic valuation techniques and portfolio
diversification.
One key strategy is the use of managerial discretion in valuation. Managers can choose between
mark-to-market and mark-to-model approaches. Mark-to-market relies on observable market prices,
while mark-to-model involves using financial models to estimate fair value. By strategically selecting
valuation techniques and timing adjustments, managers can smooth out the volatility of their
portfolios.
Another crucial strategy is portfolio diversification. By investing across various private capital asset
classes, geographic regions, and industries, managers can reduce exposure to specific risks.
Additionally, techniques like hedging and stress testing can further mitigate downside risk.
Investors should be aware of the underlying volatility of private capital investments, even if it may be
masked by return smoothing techniques. They should conduct thorough due diligence on the valuation
practices employed by managers and adopt a long-term perspective. Engaging experienced and skilled
private capital managers can enhance the probability of achieving superior risk-adjusted returns.

14
 Private Equity and Venture Capital
Private equity investments in India: A legal and structural overview
The Indian private equity scenario has undergone a sea change over the last five years or so. There has
been a considerable interest, both domestic as well as international, in the private equity sector which
is evident from the fact that the total private equity funds (more commonly understood in the Indian
context as venture capital funds (VCF)) committed to investments in India has increased
exponentially.
Though these numbers may not look substantial when compared to funds committed in other
countries like the US and Israel, they go a long way in demonstrating the rise of private equity
investments in India.
Structuring of venture capital funds
Structuring of private equity or venture capital funds in India requires special considerations from the
regulatory and tax perspective. This article endeavours to demystify the legal and regulatory concerns
surrounding the private equity funds in India.
Domestic funds
For domestic venture funds (in which the funds are raised within India), the structure that is most
commonly used is that of a domestic vehicle for the pooling of funds from the investors and a separate
investment adviser for carrying on asset management activities. For the domestic vehicle, there are
two options viz a trust or a company. India at present does not have a limited partnership structure
which is a common choice in countries like the US.
The ‘trust’ structure has been more commonly used since the company structure does have some
drawbacks mostly arising from the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 which may conflict with
some of the basic underlying principles of venture capital investments. Some of these concerns are:
 Difficulty in return of capital: Redemption of securities by companies (i.e. buyback of
securities) can be made only out of profits or proceeds of a fresh issue of securities.
Furthermore, the buyback of securities by a company in any one financial year is restricted to
a maximum of 25% of its total paid-up capital. This restriction restrains the ability of a
venture capital company to return the capital to its investors if the investments made by it are
sold at a loss.
 Difficulty in distributing returns: A company can declare dividends only if the company
has profits. There are also statutory requirements whereby if the dividends declared are more
than 10% of the par value (i.e. nominal value) of the shares, a certain portion of the
distributable profits would have to be transferred to general reserve.
 Difficulty in termination: At the time of termination of the fund, if the fund is structured as a
company, winding up procedures are extremely time consuming and also requires high court
approval. This could make the winding up process quite cumbersome.

Though some of the above shortcomings of the ‘company’ structure can be addressed by carefully
structuring the investment instruments, Indian venture capitalists have found the ‘trust’ structure to be
more favourable as it offers them more flexibility.

15
Offshore funds
Commonly there are two alternatives available to offshore investors participating in Indian venture
capital investments. The offshore investors can either use an ‘offshore structure’ or a ‘unified
structure’.

Offshore structure
Under this structure an investment vehicle, which could be a LLC or an LP organized in a jurisdiction
outside India, makes investments directly into Indian portfolio companies. There would generally be
an offshore manager for managing the assets of the fund and an investment advisor in India for
identifying deals and to carry out preliminary due-diligence on prospective investment opportunities.

Unified structure
This structure is generally used where domestic (i.e. Indian) investors are expected to participate in
the fund. Under this structure, a trust or a company is organized in India. The domestic investors
would directly contribute to the trust whereas overseas investors pool their investments in an offshore
vehicle and this offshore vehicle invests in the domestic trust. The portfolio investments are made by
the trust. The trust would generally have a domestic manager or an adviser. The offshore fund may
also have its own offshore manager/adviser. This structure also enables the domestic manager to draw
its share of carry directly from the trust.

The regulatory framework

In India, both domestic and offshore venture capital funds investing in India are regulated by the
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Until recently, SEBI only regulated the domestic
VCFs vide its SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations, 1996 (as amended by SEBI (Venture
Capital Funds (Amendment)) Regulations 2000) (VCF Regulations).
However, in September 2000, SEBI announced a new set of guidelines enabling foreign venture
capital and private equity investors to register with itself. The new guidelines are called the SEBI
(Foreign Venture Capital Investors) Regulations, 2000 (FVCI Regulations).

The SEBI (Venture Capital Funds) Regulations, 1996

Under the VCF Regulations, a venture capital fund can be organized either in the form of a trust or as
a company. Though the guidelines do not appear to make registration with SEBI mandatory, SEBI has
made its intention clear to regulate all domestic VCFs.
The VCFs are permitted to invest only in venture capital undertakings (VCUs) which are not engaged
in activities which have been classified under the negative list which broadly includes undertakings
engaged in real estate business, non-banking financial services, gold financing etc. Furthermore, the
VCU has to be a domestic company whose shares are not listed on a recognized stock exchange which
means that domestic VCFs are not permitted to invest in securities of foreign companies.

16
Eligibility criteria
For registering as a VCF, the VCF Regulations, require, inter alia, that:
 the main objective of the VCF (whether a company or a trust) should be to carry on the
activity of a venture capital fund;
 the constituting documents (memorandum and articles of association in the case of a company
and the trust deed in case of a trust) should contain a prohibition from making an invitation to
the public to subscribe to its securities.
 However, it should be noted that VCF Regulations do permit domestic VCFs to list their
securities after a period of 3 years from the date of issuance of these securities; and
 in the case of a trust seeking registration, the eligibility criteria prescribed requires that, the
instrument of trust should be registered under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 of
India.

Investment conditions and restrictions

SEBI has prescribed certain investment restrictions on the VCF both in terms of acceptance of
contributions as well as for making downline investments in portfolio companies. These are as
follows:
 Minimum investment to be accepted from any investor should be Rs 500,000 (approximately
$11,500) except in the case of employees, principal officers or directors of the VCF,
employees of the manager of the VCF where lower amounts may be accepted.
 Minimum firm capital commitments from its investors should be Rs 50 million.
 A VCF is not permitted to invest more than 25% of its corpus in any one VCU and at least
75% of its investible funds are required to be invested in unlisted equity shares or equity
linked instruments: Provided, if the VCF wants to gain the tax benefits, it will have to exit
from such investments within a period of one year from the date of listing of the shares of the
VCUs on a recognized stock exchange in India.
 A VCF may also invest up to 25% of its investible funds by way of: (i) subscription to an
initial public offering of a VCU whose shares are proposed to be listed on a recognized stock
exchange subject to a lock in period of one year; or (ii) in debt or debt instruments of a VCU
in which it has already made an investment by way of equity.
 A VCF is also not permitted to invest in associated companies which have been defined to
mean companies which exercise control over the VCF or where VCF exercises control over
the companies
The mandatory exit clause in respect of unlisted investments has generated very strong negative
reactions among the venture capital community in India and overseas and have demanded that in
order to foster growth of venture capital industry in India, such restrictive clauses should be removed
from the VCF Regulations. The Finance Minister has also made press statements in which he has
indicated that this clause will be deleted in the near future.

The SEBI (Foreign Venture Capital Investor) Regulations, 2000

17
An FVCI has been defined under the FVCI Regulations to mean an investor incorporated or
established outside India, which proposes to make investments in venture capital fund(s) or venture
capital undertakings in India and is registered under these Regulations.
Unlike the VCF Regulations which seem to make it mandatory for VCFs to register with the SEBI,
the FVCI Regulations does not make it mandatory for an offshore venture capital investor to register
with SEBI as an FVCI. Also, the SEBI’s intention is really not to regulate the FVCIs but to monitor
the foreign investments coming into the domestic venture capital sector.
Eligibility criteria
In order to determine the eligibility of an applicant, SEBI would consider, inter alia, the applicant’s
track record, professional competence, financial soundness, experience, whether the applicant is
regulated by an appropriate foreign regulatory authority or is an income tax payer or submits a
certificate from its banker of its or its promoter’s track record where the applicant is neither a
regulated entity nor an income tax payer. The applicant can be a pension pund, mutual fund,
investment trust, investment company, investment partnership, asset management company,
endowment fund, university fund, charitable institution or any other investment vehicle incorporated
and established outside India.
Investment conditions and restrictions
The investment restrictions applicable to FVCI are similar to those applicable to VCFs under the VCF
Regulations (as listed above) except for the following:
 no minimum corpus or capital commitment requirement for FVCIs;
 no minimum individual contribution prescribed under the FVCI Regulations;
 no mandatory exit clause in respect of investments by an FVCI in unlisted securities; and
 for determining the maximum investment in a single VCU (i.e. 25% of the corpus), the funds
earmarked for India will be taken into consideration.
The FVCI Regulations make it mandatory for a FVCI to appoint a domestic custodian for the purpose
of custody of securities and for entering into an arrangement with a designated bank for the purpose of
opening a special non-resident Indian rupee or foreign currency account. SEBI acts as a nodal agency
for all necessary approvals including the permission of the Reserve Band of India for opening of the
bank account.
In addition to the above investment conditions and restrictions, there are certain reporting and
disclosure requirements that need to be satisfied by a registered FVCI on an continuing basis.
Taxation
Domestic VCFs
Domestic VCFs are entitled to tax benefits under Section 10(23FB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(ITA). As per this section, any income earned by a SEBI registered VCF (which could be a trust or a
company) set up to raise funds for investment in a venture capital undertaking is exempt from tax.
This section has to be read with Section 115U of the IT Act which gives SEBI registered VCFs a pass-
through status whereby the investors in the VCF are directly taxed on any income distributed by the
VCFs as though the investors have made direct investment in the portfolio companies. The taxation of
such income in the hands of the investors will depend on the nature of income which will remain the
same as in the hands of the VCFs.

Private Equity and Venture Capital

18
2023 witnessed a notable shift in the Indian Private Equity and Venture Capital (PE-VC) landscape,
marked by a significant decline in deal activity compared to the previous year. This downturn, largely
attributed to global factors such as weakened investor sentiment, rising interest rates, and geopolitical
tensions, led to a 35% reduction in overall deal value.
Despite this overall slowdown, traditional sectors like healthcare and advanced manufacturing
emerged as relative bright spots. Healthcare investments reached a record high, driven by increased
consolidation in multi-specialty providers and the emergence of specialized healthcare assets.
Advanced manufacturing also witnessed robust growth, fuelled by global supply chain diversification
and government incentives.
In contrast, the technology sector, particularly SaaS and new-age tech, experienced a sharp decline in
investment. Investors became increasingly cautious, prioritizing businesses with proven business
models and strong economic performance. This shift in investor sentiment led many well-funded SaaS
companies to remain on the sidelines.
While deal activity slowed, 2023 proved to be a strong year for exits. Exit value surged by 15%,
driven by a rise in public market sales and increased domestic investor participation. This trend
highlights the deepening of India's public markets and the growing confidence of domestic investors.
India's rising prominence in the global PE-VC landscape continued in 2023, with the country
accounting for approximately 20% of all PE-VC investments in the Asia-Pacific region. This
increased interest from both domestic and global investors has led to significant expansion of Indian
PE-VC teams, as funds seek to capitalize on the country's long-term growth potential.
Looking ahead, the near-term outlook for Indian PE-VC remains tempered due to ongoing global
uncertainties. However, traditional sectors and sectors benefiting from global supply chain
diversification are expected to continue attracting significant investments. As India's economy
continues to grow and mature, the PE-VC industry is poised to play a crucial role in driving
innovation and economic development.

Global Investment Trends

19
In 2023, the global private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) landscape faced significant
headwinds. A confluence of factors, including persistent economic challenges such as elevated interest
rates, weakened consumer spending, and geopolitical tensions, led to a substantial decline in
investment activity. As a result, global deal values contracted by 30-40% year-over-year. To navigate
this challenging environment, investors shifted their focus towards existing portfolio companies,
prioritizing strategies to optimize returns and provide liquidity to their limited partners. This shift in
focus away from new deals was a direct response to the uncertain market conditions.
The Indian Context
The Indian PE and VC market mirrored the global trend, experiencing a decline of approximately
35% in deal activity, bringing it back to pre-pandemic levels. While both PE and VC investments
contracted, the impact was more pronounced on VC deals, which witnessed a sharp 60% decline. This
significant drop in VC activity can be attributed to increased investor caution and a heightened focus
on the profitability of business models. In contrast, PE investments exhibited greater resilience,
declining by around 20%.
Underlying Factors
Several factors contributed to the overall slowdown in PE and VC investments:
 Weakened Macroeconomic Sentiment: A pessimistic outlook on global and domestic
economic conditions dampened investor confidence.
 Rising Interest Rates: Higher borrowing costs reduced the availability of capital and
increased the cost of capital for businesses.
 Valuation Mismatches: Disagreements between buyers and sellers regarding asset valuations
hindered deal closures.
The 2023 investment landscape was characterized by a significant decline in both PE and VC activity,
driven by a combination of economic factors and changing investor sentiment. While PE investments
displayed relative resilience, VC investors adopted a more cautious approach, prioritizing profitable
business models and focusing on existing portfolio companies.
 Global firms diversified production outside China to mitigate sourcing and supply chain risks
caused by Covid-19 led disruptions in production and continued US-China decoupling
 Favourable policies in India such as PLIs, export promotion initiatives, customs duty
rationalization, etc., drove some shift in economic activity and subsequent investments to
India
 Increased domestic consumption on the back of expanding middle class (~330M in 2016 to
~430M in 2021), growing working age population (~810M in 2016 to ~875M in 2021)
 Scale adoption of digital rails (e.g., UPI, OCEN) and effective fiscal and monetary policy
discipline.

20
A Shift Towards Fundamentals: A Sector Deep Dive
The 2023 Investment Landscape
In 2023, the investment landscape underwent a significant shift. As economic uncertainties persisted,
investors increasingly gravitated towards traditional sectors with established business models and
long-term growth potential. This trend was evident in the allocation of capital, with approximately
75% of investments directed towards traditional sectors, compared to 60% in the previous year.
Healthcare: A Sector on the Rise
The healthcare sector emerged as a standout performer, attracting a record-breaking $5.5 billion in
investments. This surge was primarily driven by a threefold increase in deals involving healthcare
providers. The ongoing consolidation of multi-specialty healthcare providers and the emergence of
scalable single-specialty assets with attractive business profiles were key factors contributing to this
growth.
Advanced Manufacturing: A Promising Future
Advanced manufacturing also witnessed substantial growth, with investments increasing by
approximately 20% CAGR over the 2021-2023 period. This growth was fueled by several factors,
including supply chain diversification, government incentives, and the availability of numerous scale
assets.
IT/ITeS and Tech: A Period of Consolidation
In contrast, the IT/ITeS and technology sectors experienced a decline in deal activity. The high
valuations of IT/ITeS companies and subdued demand in end markets led to a 65% decrease in
investments. Similarly, the SaaS and new-age tech sectors faced a 60% decline, as investors
prioritized profitability over growth and well-funded scale SaaS companies remained on the sidelines.
Outlook for 2024
Looking ahead to 2024, a strong deal pipeline is anticipated in the healthcare and advanced
manufacturing sectors. In healthcare, continued deal activity is expected across both multi-specialty
and single-specialty providers. Additionally, numerous scale pharma and MedTech deals are likely to
come to market.
Within advanced manufacturing, the packaging, electronics, and electric vehicle (EV) sectors are
poised for growth. Scale assets in globally competitive niches are expected to attract significant
investor interest, while government support is driving rapid expansion in electronics manufacturing.
Furthermore, the increasing penetration of EVs is creating new opportunities for investment.
The 2023 investment landscape highlighted a shift towards traditional sectors with proven business
models. While the technology sector experienced a slowdown, the healthcare and advanced
manufacturing sectors emerged as key areas of focus. As we move into 2024, these sectors are
expected to continue to drive deal activity and shape the future of the investment landscape.

21
A Year of Exits: Public Markets Take Centre Stage
In 2023, the Indian private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) landscape witnessed a notable
increase in exit activity, with exit values rising by approximately 15% to reach $29 billion. This surge
was primarily driven by a significant uptick in public market sales, which accounted for nearly half of
the total exit value.
The Rise of Indian Public Markets
Indian public markets have experienced substantial growth in recent years, outperforming many major
global markets. This growth has been fuelled by a significant increase in domestic investor
participation, encompassing both retail and institutional investors. This increased investor interest has
extended across various sectors and companies, making the Indian public market an attractive avenue
for exits.
Exit Mechanisms
Non-initial public offering (IPO) block and bulk trades were the dominant exit mechanism in 2023,
contributing to 90% of the total exit value. This method was particularly prevalent in both traditional
and new-age sectors for listed companies.
While IPOs remained a viable exit route, they were primarily concentrated in traditional sectors. New-
age sectors with high private market valuations were less likely to pursue IPOs, as the public market
valuations often did not align with their private market valuations.
Sponsor-to-Sponsor Exits
Sponsor-to-sponsor exits maintained a steady pace in 2023, primarily supported by large deals in the
healthcare provider space. Notable examples include the exits of Manipal Hospitals, Indira IVF,
CARE Hospitals, and KIMS Hospitals.
2023 was a significant year for PE and VC exits in India. The increasing depth and liquidity of Indian
public markets, combined with the diverse range of exit mechanisms available, provided ample
opportunities for investors to realize returns on their investments.

22
 Healthcare saw large provider exits (Manipal, Indira IVF, CARE, KIMS) via sponsor-to-
sponsor exits as funds doubled down on scale assets driven by strong growth outlook for
providers.
 Increase in SaaS and consumer tech exits driven by a few high-value transactions (Flipkart,
Freshworks, Lenskart, IBS Software).
 Fintech exits surged ($1.3B in value, 7x in volume), driven by block/bulk trades in Paytm, PB
Fintech & CAMS, insurgents acquiring smaller start-ups (e.g., CRED acquired Spenny,
Perfios acquired Fego.ai)
 India's strategic sectors, including healthcare, advanced manufacturing, infrastructure, and
renewable energy, are likely to witness substantial investment inflows. This is shown by a
combination of strong fundamentals, supportive government policies (such as production-
linked incentives and tax breaks), and the emergence of large-scale domestic players across
various sub-segments.
 Moreover, the global trend of supply chain diversification is expected to favour Indian
manufacturers in export-oriented sectors like electronics, pharmaceuticals (particularly APIs
and CDMOs), and specialty chemicals. These sectors, characterized by globally competitive
Indian companies and robust government support, are well-positioned to capitalize on this
opportunity.

23
Global Economic Outlook Remains Uncertain
 Persistent High-Interest Rates: Elevated interest rates are expected to continue through the
first half of 2024, limiting capital availability and increasing borrowing costs.
 Geopolitical Tensions: Ongoing geopolitical uncertainties could lead to commodity price
spikes and trade disruptions, potentially impacting sectors like pharmaceuticals and
manufacturing.
 Global Growth: Global GDP growth is projected to slowdown in 2024, especially in
advanced economies, leading to slower deal activity in the IT and ITeS sectors.
Despite the challenging global backdrop, India is poised to attract significant capital inflows.
 Robust Economic Growth: India is expected to be the fastest-growing major economy in
2024, with a projected GDP growth rate of 6.5%.
 Stable Macroeconomic Environment: A stable economic landscape, supported by
disciplined fiscal and monetary policies, is expected to drive investments.
 Government Support: Supportive government policies, including production-linked
incentives, tax incentives, and import duties, are aimed at boosting economic activity and
attracting investments, particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, and
renewable energy.
India's Manufacturing Sector: A Global Beneficiary
The global trend of supply chain diversification is expected to benefit Indian manufacturers with
proven international capabilities.
 Electronics: The emergence of 10-15 large-scale EMS assets is likely to drive deal activity in
mobile, consumer electronics, and IT hardware segments.
 Pharmaceuticals: Scale assets in APIs, CDMOs, and specialty products with global
competitiveness and high-quality standards are poised to attract significant investment.
 Chemicals: A few scale assets in agrochemicals and specialty chemicals are expected to drive
deal activity, with potential for platform plays to further fuel interest in specialty chemicals.
While global economic uncertainties persist, India's strong fundamentals, supportive government
policies, and growing manufacturing capabilities position the country as a promising investment
destination.

24
Conclusion: India's Rise as a Global PE Hub
India's burgeoning economy, coupled with a supportive regulatory environment, is making it an
increasingly attractive destination for global private equity (PE) investments. Government-led
initiatives, such as 'Make in India' are driving growth across sectors like infrastructure, technology,
healthcare, and renewable energy.
Key factors contributing to India's appeal to PE investors include:
 Strong Economic Fundamentals: India's robust economic growth, coupled with a large and
growing middle class, offers significant investment opportunities.
 Favourable Regulatory Environment: The Indian government's focus on regulatory
reforms, including the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and Goods and Services Tax
(GST), has improved the ease of doing business and investor protection.
 Supportive Policy Framework: Initiatives like 'Make in India' are encouraging domestic
manufacturing and attracting foreign investment.
 Skilled Workforce: India boasts a large pool of skilled and cost-effective labour, making it an
ideal location for businesses.
By creating a conducive investment climate, India is positioning itself as a global PE powerhouse. As
the country continues to liberalize its economy and strengthen its regulatory framework, it is poised to
attract significant PE investments in the years to come.
India's Private Equity industry has created the conditions for both domestic and foreign investors to
participate completely. The private equity market in India is thriving, just like the country's overall
economy. The Indian PE market has a promising future ahead of it, with more success stories and
well-crafted regulations opening the way for more expansion as the market eventually matures.
Furthermore, it appears that this market isn't just a bubble, given the PE market's rapid expansion
worldwide and the broader move away from public equities. It appears to be well-positioned to last
for the foreseeable future. There will surely be excellent chances given India's robust economy, a
developing and progressive regulatory structure, and a highly entrepreneurial environment.

25
Annexure:

26
27