>Warning # 849 in column 23.

Text: in_ID
>The LOCALE subcommand of the SET command has an invalid parameter. It could
>not be mapped to a valid backend locale.

Your temporary usage period for IBM SPSS Statistics will expire in 4106 days.

GET
FILE='C:\Users\Arif Kurniawan\Downloads\Data set5.sav'.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
GET
FILE='C:\Users\Arif Kurniawan\Downloads\Data set5 (1).sav'.
DATASET NAME DataSet2 WINDOW=FRONT.
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=NRF_S_K BY JK Usia Usia_K Usia_K2 IMT IMT_K LOS Pekerjaan Suku Gejal
a_Utama T N M TMN
Stadium PS S_Merokok IB
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR RISK
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs
[DataSet2] C:\Users\Arif Kurniawan\Downloads\Data set5 (1).sav

Page 1
 Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Jenis Kelamin
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Usia
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Usia (Kategorik)
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Usia (Kategeorik)
NRF Serum Kategorik * IMT 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

NRF Serum Kategorik * IMT 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

(Kategorik)
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Lenght of Stay
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Pekerjaan
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Suku
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Gejala Utama
NRF Serum Kategorik * 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Stadium Tumor
NRF Serum Kategorik * 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Stadium Node
NRF Serum Kategorik * 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Stadium Metastase
NRF Serum Kategorik * 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Stadium TMN
NRF Serum Kategorik * 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Stadium TMN
NRF Serum Kategorik * PS 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%

NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

Status merokok
NRF Serum Kategorik * 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Indeks Brinkman

NRF Serum Kategorik * Jenis Kelamin

Page 2
 Crosstab
Count
Jenis Kelamin
Laki-laki Perempuan Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1 0 1
>0.835 37 17 54
Total 38 17 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,456 a 1 ,500

Continuity Correction b ,000 1 1,000

Likelihood Ratio ,748 1 ,387

Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,691
Linear-by-Linear ,447 1 ,504
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,31.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Error a Approximate
b
Value Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,091 ,047 ,665 ,509 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,091 ,047 ,665 ,509 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 3
 Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Jenis Kelamin = 1,459 1,218 1,749
Laki-laki
N of Valid Cases 55

NRF Serum Kategorik * Usia

Crosstab
Count
Usia
18,00 19,00 20,00 21,00 25,00 27,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 2 1 1 1 1 3
Total 2 1 1 1 1 3

Crosstab
Count
Usia
28,00 30,00 31,00 32,00 34,00 36,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 1 1 3 1 2 1
Total 1 1 3 1 2 1

Crosstab
Count
Usia
37,00 38,00 40,00 41,00 42,00 44,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 1 0 0 0
>0.835 1 1 0 2 1 3
Total 1 1 1 2 1 3

Page 4
 Crosstab
Count
Usia
46,00 48,00 49,00 50,00 51,00 52,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 1 2 1 2 1 2
Total 1 2 1 2 1 2

Crosstab
Count
Usia
53,00 55,00 57,00 58,00 59,00 61,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 2 2 1 3 2 2
Total 2 2 1 3 2 2

Crosstab
Count
Usia
63,00 64,00 66,00 72,00 78,00 80,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 1 1 1 1 2 1
Total 1 1 1 1 2 1

Crosstab
Count

Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1
>0.835 54
Total 55

Page 5
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 55,000 35 ,017

Likelihood Ratio 9,996 35 1,000

Linear-by-Linear ,114 1 ,736
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 72 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,02.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,046 ,029 ,334 ,740 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,060 ,042 ,438 ,663 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Usia (Kategorik)

Page 6
 Crosstab
Count
Usia (Kategorik)
<50 tahun >= 50 tahun Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1 0 1
>0.835 30 24 54
Total 31 24 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,789 a 1 ,375

Continuity Correction b ,000 1 1,000

Likelihood Ratio 1,161 1 ,281

Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,564
Linear-by-Linear ,774 1 ,379
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Error a Approximate
b
Value Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,120 ,061 ,878 ,384 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,120 ,061 ,878 ,384 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 7
 Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
For cohort Usia (Kategorik) 1,800 1,418 2,285
= <50 tahun
N of Valid Cases 55

NRF Serum Kategorik * Usia (Kategeorik)

Crosstab
Count
Usia (Kategeorik)
<= 50 tahun 51-64 tahun >= 65 tahun Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1 0 0 1
>0.835 32 17 5 54
Total 33 17 5 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,679 2 ,712

Likelihood Ratio 1,034 2 ,596

Linear-by-Linear ,558 1 ,455
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,09.

Page 8
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,102 ,052 ,744 ,460
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,109 ,055 ,795 ,430

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * IMT

Crosstab
Count
IMT
16,80 17,20 17,40 17,60 18,10 18,20
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 3 1 1 1 1 4
Total 3 1 1 1 1 4

Crosstab
Count
IMT
18,30 18,40 18,60 18,80 19,40 19,70
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 1 3 4 3 1 2
Total 1 3 4 3 1 2

Page 9
 Crosstab
Count
IMT
19,80 20,20 20,30 20,40 20,50 20,60
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 2 1 1 4 2 4
Total 2 1 1 4 2 4

Crosstab
Count
IMT
20,80 21,20 21,40 21,60 21,80 22,40
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 1 0
>0.835 3 1 1 3 2 1
Total 3 1 1 3 3 1

Crosstab
Count
IMT
22,60 22,70 22,80 24,70 Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 1
>0.835 1 1 1 1 54
Total 1 1 1 1 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 17,654 27 ,914

Likelihood Ratio 6,177 27 1,000

Linear-by-Linear 1,259 1 ,262
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 56 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,02.

Page 10
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,153 ,078 -1,125 ,266
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,180 ,090 -1,334 ,188

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * IMT (Kategorik)

Crosstab
Count
IMT (Kategorik)
Underweight Normal Overweight Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 1 0 1
>0.835 16 37 1 54
Total 16 38 1 55

Page 11
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,456 2 ,796

Likelihood Ratio ,748 2 ,688

Linear-by-Linear ,317 1 ,573
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,02.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,077 ,041 -,559 ,578 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,080 ,042 -,584 ,561 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Lenght of Stay

Page 12
 Crosstab
Count
Lenght of Stay
4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 8,00 9,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 1 0 0 0
>0.835 1 2 4 13 9 10
Total 1 2 5 13 9 10

Crosstab
Count
Lenght of Stay
10,00 11,00 12,00 14,00 15,00 18,00
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 0 0
>0.835 2 4 4 1 3 1
Total 2 4 4 1 3 1

Crosstab
Count

Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1
>0.835 54
Total 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 10,185 11 ,514

Likelihood Ratio 4,992 11 ,932

Linear-by-Linear 1,030 1 ,310
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 21 cells (87,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,02.

Page 13
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,138 ,069 1,015 ,315
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,191 ,094 1,417 ,162

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Pekerjaan

Crosstab
Count
Pekerjaan
PNS Wiraswasta IRT Pensiunan Petani
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 0 0 1
>0.835 8 16 11 2 7
Total 8 16 11 2 8

Crosstab
Count
Pekerjaan
Lainnya Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 1
>0.835 10 54
Total 10 55

Page 14
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 5,984 5 ,308

Likelihood Ratio 3,968 5 ,554

Linear-by-Linear ,960 1 ,327
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 7 cells (58,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,04.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,133 ,069 -,979 ,332 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,118 ,063 -,868 ,389 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Suku

Page 15
 Crosstab
Count
Suku
Bugis Makassar Toraja Mandar Lainnya Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1 0 0 0 0 1
>0.835 26 13 4 2 9 54
Total 27 13 4 2 9 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1,056 4 ,901

Likelihood Ratio 1,442 4 ,837

Linear-by-Linear ,607 1 ,436
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 7 cells (70,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,04.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,106 ,053 ,776 ,441 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,129 ,065 ,948 ,347 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 16
 Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Gejala Utama

Crosstab
Count
Gejala Utama
Batuk Batuk darah Sesak napas Nyeri dada Total
NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 0 1 0 1
>0.835 17 2 21 14 54
Total 17 2 22 14 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1,528 3 ,676

Likelihood Ratio 1,860 3 ,602

Linear-by-Linear ,117 1 ,732
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,04.

Page 17
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,047 ,029 -,339 ,736
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,023 ,028 -,165 ,869

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Stadium Tumor

Crosstab
Count
Stadium Tumor
T1 T2 T3 T4 Total
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 3 6 13 15 37
Total 3 6 13 15 37

Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Page 18
 Symmetric Measures
Value
a
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum .
Kategorik (>0.835 / .)

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Stadium Node

Crosstab
Count
Stadium Node
N0 N1 N2 N3 Total
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 11 4 7 15 37
Total 11 4 7 15 37

Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Page 19
 Symmetric Measures
Value
a
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum .
Kategorik (>0.835 / .)

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Stadium Metastase

Crosstab
Count
Stadium Metastase
M0 M1a M1b M1c Total
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 11 14 6 6 37
Total 11 14 6 6 37

Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Page 20
 Symmetric Measures
Value
a
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum .
Kategorik (>0.835 / .)

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Stadium TMN

Crosstab
Count
Stadium TMN
IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IIIC
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 1 1 2 3 2 2
Total 1 1 2 3 2 2

Crosstab
Count
Stadium TMN
IVA IVB Total
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 19 7 37
Total 19 7 37

Page 21
 Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .a

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum .a
Kategorik (>0.835 / .)

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Stadium TMN

Crosstab
Count
Stadium TMN
I-IIIA IIIB-IV Total
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 7 30 37
Total 7 30 37

Page 22
 Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .a

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum .a
Kategorik (>0.835 / .)

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

NRF Serum Kategorik * PS

Crosstab
Count
PS
1,00 2,00 Total
NRF Serum Kategorik >0.835 19 18 37
Total 19 18 37

Page 23
 Chi-Square Tests
Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Symmetric Measures
Value
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .a

N of Valid Cases 37

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum .a
Kategorik (>0.835 / .)

a. No statistics are computed because NRF Serum Kategorik is a constant.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Status merokok

Crosstab
Count
Status merokok

Perokok aktif Perokok pasif Tidak merokok Total

NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 1 0 0 1
>0.835 25 9 20 54
Total 26 9 20 55

Page 24
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1,136 2 ,567

Likelihood Ratio 1,519 2 ,468

Linear-by-Linear ,963 1 ,327
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 3 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,16.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,134 ,067 ,981 ,331 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,135 ,068 ,995 ,324 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

NRF Serum Kategorik * Indeks Brinkman

Page 25
 Crosstab
Count
Indeks Brinkman

Bukan perokok Ringan Sedang Berat Total

NRF Serum Kategorik <=0.835 0 1 0 0 1
>0.835 29 6 8 11 54
Total 29 7 8 11 55

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 6,984 3 ,072

Likelihood Ratio 4,255 3 ,235

Linear-by-Linear ,000 1 ,988
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,13.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,002 ,018 ,015 ,988
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,047 ,040 -,341 ,735

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 26
 Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for NRF Serum
Kategorik (<=0.835 / >0.
835)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=JK Usia Usia_K Usia_K2 IMT IMT_K LOS Pekerjaan Suku Gejala_Utama T N
M TMN Stadium PS
S_Merokok IB BY NRF_B_K
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ CORR RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jenis Kelamin * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Usia * NRF BAL Kategorik 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

Usia (Kategorik) * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

Kategorik
Usia (Kategeorik) * NRF 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
BAL Kategorik
IMT * NRF BAL Kategorik 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
IMT (Kategorik) * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Lenght of Stay * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Pekerjaan * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Kategorik

Page 27
 Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Suku * NRF BAL Kategorik 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

Gejala Utama * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%

Kategorik
Stadium Tumor * NRF BAL 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Stadium Node * NRF BAL 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Stadium Metastase * NRF 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
BAL Kategorik
Stadium TMN * NRF BAL 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Stadium TMN * NRF BAL 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
PS * NRF BAL Kategorik 37 67,3% 18 32,7% 55 100,0%
Status merokok * NRF BAL 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
Kategorik
Indeks Brinkman * NRF 55 100,0% 0 0,0% 55 100,0%
BAL Kategorik

Jenis Kelamin * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 28
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki Count 18 20 38
% within Jenis Kelamin 47,4% 52,6% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 75,0% 64,5% 69,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 32,7% 36,4% 69,1%
Perempuan Count 6 11 17
% within Jenis Kelamin 35,3% 64,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 25,0% 35,5% 30,9%
Kategorik
% of Total 10,9% 20,0% 30,9%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Jenis Kelamin 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,696 a 1 ,404
b
Continuity Correction ,292 1 ,589

Likelihood Ratio ,705 1 ,401

Fisher's Exact Test ,558 ,296
Linear-by-Linear ,684 1 ,408
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,42.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Page 29
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,113 ,132 ,824 ,413
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,113 ,132 ,824 ,413

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Jenis 1,650 ,506 5,376
Kelamin (Laki-laki /
Perempuan)
For cohort NRF BAL 1,342 ,650 2,773
Kategorik = <= 1.412
For cohort NRF BAL ,813 ,512 1,292
Kategorik = > 1.412
N of Valid Cases 55

Usia * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 30
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Usia 18,00 Count 2 0 2
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 0,0% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 0,0% 3,6%
19,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
20,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
21,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
25,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
27,00 Count 2 1 3
% within Usia 66,7% 33,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 3,2% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 1,8% 5,5%
28,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
30,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%

Page 31
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
31,00 Count 2 1 3
% within Usia 66,7% 33,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 3,2% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 1,8% 5,5%
32,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
34,00 Count 0 2 2
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 6,5% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 3,6% 3,6%
36,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
37,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
38,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
40,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%

Page 32
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
41,00 Count 0 2 2
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 6,5% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 3,6% 3,6%
42,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
44,00 Count 0 3 3
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 9,7% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 5,5% 5,5%
46,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
48,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Usia 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
49,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
50,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Usia 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%

Page 33
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
51,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
52,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Usia 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
53,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Usia 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
55,00 Count 0 2 2
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 6,5% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 3,6% 3,6%
57,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
58,00 Count 1 2 3
% within Usia 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 6,5% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 3,6% 5,5%
59,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Usia 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%

Page 34
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
61,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Usia 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
63,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
64,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Usia 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
66,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
72,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
78,00 Count 2 0 2
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 0,0% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 0,0% 3,6%
80,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Usia 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%

Page 35
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Usia 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 34,671 35 ,484

Likelihood Ratio 47,260 35 ,081

Linear-by-Linear ,176 1 ,675
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 72 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,057 ,140 -,416 ,679 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,016 ,143 -,118 ,907 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 36
 Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Usia (18,00 /
19,00)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Usia (Kategorik) * NRF BAL Kategorik

Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Usia (Kategorik) <50 tahun Count 13 18 31
% within Usia (Kategorik) 41,9% 58,1% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 54,2% 58,1% 56,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 23,6% 32,7% 56,4%
>= 50 tahun Count 11 13 24
% within Usia (Kategorik) 45,8% 54,2% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 45,8% 41,9% 43,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 20,0% 23,6% 43,6%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Usia (Kategorik) 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Page 37
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,084 a 1 ,773
b
Continuity Correction ,000 1 ,988

Likelihood Ratio ,084 1 ,773

Fisher's Exact Test ,791 ,493
Linear-by-Linear ,082 1 ,775
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Error a Approximate
b
Value Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,039 ,135 -,284 ,778 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,039 ,135 -,284 ,778 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Usia ,854 ,292 2,499
(Kategorik) (<50 tahun / >=
50 tahun)
For cohort NRF BAL ,915 ,502 1,668
Kategorik = <= 1.412
For cohort NRF BAL 1,072 ,667 1,722
Kategorik = > 1.412
N of Valid Cases 55

Usia (Kategeorik) * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 38
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Usia (Kategeorik) <= 50 tahun Count 14 19 33
% within Usia (Kategeorik) 42,4% 57,6% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 58,3% 61,3% 60,0%

Kategorik
% of Total 25,5% 34,5% 60,0%
51-64 tahun Count 5 12 17
% within Usia (Kategeorik) 29,4% 70,6% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 20,8% 38,7% 30,9%

Kategorik
% of Total 9,1% 21,8% 30,9%
>= 65 tahun Count 5 0 5
% within Usia (Kategeorik) 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 20,8% 0,0% 9,1%

Kategorik
% of Total 9,1% 0,0% 9,1%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Usia (Kategeorik) 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 7,877 2 ,019

Likelihood Ratio 9,769 2 ,008

Linear-by-Linear 1,741 1 ,187
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,18.

Page 39
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,180 ,129 -1,329 ,190
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,109 ,138 -,799 ,428

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Usia
(Kategeorik) (<= 50 tahun /
51-64 tahun)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

IMT * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 40
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
IMT 16,80 Count 3 0 3
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 0,0% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 0,0% 5,5%
17,20 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
17,40 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
17,60 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
18,10 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
18,20 Count 1 3 4
% within IMT 25,0% 75,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 9,7% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 5,5% 7,3%
18,30 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
18,40 Count 0 3 3
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Page 41
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 9,7% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 5,5% 5,5%
18,60 Count 3 1 4
% within IMT 75,0% 25,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 3,2% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 1,8% 7,3%
18,80 Count 1 2 3
% within IMT 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 6,5% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 3,6% 5,5%
19,40 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
19,70 Count 0 2 2
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 6,5% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 3,6% 3,6%
19,80 Count 0 2 2
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 6,5% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 3,6% 3,6%
20,20 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
20,30 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Page 42
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
20,40 Count 3 1 4
% within IMT 75,0% 25,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 3,2% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 1,8% 7,3%
20,50 Count 1 1 2
% within IMT 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
20,60 Count 2 2 4
% within IMT 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 6,5% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 3,6% 7,3%
20,80 Count 0 3 3
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 9,7% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 5,5% 5,5%
21,20 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
21,40 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
21,60 Count 1 2 3
% within IMT 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%

Page 43
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 6,5% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 3,6% 5,5%
21,80 Count 2 1 3
% within IMT 66,7% 33,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 3,2% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 1,8% 5,5%
22,40 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
22,60 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
22,70 Count 1 0 1
% within IMT 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
22,80 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
24,70 Count 0 1 1
% within IMT 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Page 44
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within IMT 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 31,621 27 ,246

Likelihood Ratio 42,082 27 ,032

Linear-by-Linear 1,569 1 ,210
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 56 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,170 ,130 1,259 ,213 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,136 ,139 1,003 ,321 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 45
 Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for IMT (16,80 /
17,20)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

IMT (Kategorik) * NRF BAL Kategorik

Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
IMT (Kategorik) Underweight Count 9 7 16
% within IMT (Kategorik) 56,3% 43,8% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 37,5% 22,6% 29,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 16,4% 12,7% 29,1%
Normal Count 15 23 38
% within IMT (Kategorik) 39,5% 60,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 62,5% 74,2% 69,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 27,3% 41,8% 69,1%
Overweight Count 0 1 1
% within IMT (Kategorik) 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within IMT (Kategorik) 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Page 46
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 2,077 2 ,354

Likelihood Ratio 2,440 2 ,295

Linear-by-Linear 1,863 1 ,172
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,186 ,129 1,376 ,175 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,181 ,131 1,340 ,186 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for IMT
(Kategorik) (Underweight /
Normal)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Lenght of Stay * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 47
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Lenght of Stay 4,00 Count 1 0 1
% within Lenght of Stay 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 0,0% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 0,0% 1,8%
5,00 Count 1 1 2
% within Lenght of Stay 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
6,00 Count 3 2 5
% within Lenght of Stay 60,0% 40,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 6,5% 9,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 3,6% 9,1%
7,00 Count 2 11 13
% within Lenght of Stay 15,4% 84,6% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 35,5% 23,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 20,0% 23,6%
8,00 Count 3 6 9
% within Lenght of Stay 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 19,4% 16,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 10,9% 16,4%
9,00 Count 4 6 10
% within Lenght of Stay 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 16,7% 19,4% 18,2%
Kategorik
% of Total 7,3% 10,9% 18,2%
10,00 Count 2 0 2
% within Lenght of Stay 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 0,0% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 0,0% 3,6%
11,00 Count 3 1 4
% within Lenght of Stay 75,0% 25,0% 100,0%

Page 48
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 3,2% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 1,8% 7,3%
12,00 Count 2 2 4
% within Lenght of Stay 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 6,5% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 3,6% 7,3%
14,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Lenght of Stay 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
15,00 Count 3 0 3
% within Lenght of Stay 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 0,0% 5,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 0,0% 5,5%
18,00 Count 0 1 1
% within Lenght of Stay 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 3,2% 1,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 1,8% 1,8%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Lenght of Stay 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Page 49
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 16,202 11 ,134

Likelihood Ratio 19,726 11 ,049

Linear-by-Linear 1,110 1 ,292
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 20 cells (83,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,44.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,143 ,139 -1,055 ,296 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,168 ,140 -1,244 ,219 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Lenght of
Stay (4,00 / 5,00)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Pekerjaan * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 50
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Pekerjaan PNS Count 3 5 8
% within Pekerjaan 37,5% 62,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 16,1% 14,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 9,1% 14,5%
Wiraswasta Count 8 8 16
% within Pekerjaan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 33,3% 25,8% 29,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 14,5% 14,5% 29,1%
IRT Count 4 7 11
% within Pekerjaan 36,4% 63,6% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 16,7% 22,6% 20,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 7,3% 12,7% 20,0%
Pensiunan Count 2 0 2
% within Pekerjaan 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 8,3% 0,0% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 0,0% 3,6%
Petani Count 4 4 8
% within Pekerjaan 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 16,7% 12,9% 14,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 7,3% 7,3% 14,5%
Lainnya Count 3 7 10
% within Pekerjaan 30,0% 70,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 22,6% 18,2%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 12,7% 18,2%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Pekerjaan 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Page 51
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4,094 5 ,536

Likelihood Ratio 4,859 5 ,433

Linear-by-Linear ,094 1 ,760
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 8 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,87.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,042 ,133 ,304 ,763 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,038 ,134 ,275 ,784 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan
(PNS / Wiraswasta)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Suku * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 52
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Suku Bugis Count 11 16 27
% within Suku 40,7% 59,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 45,8% 51,6% 49,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 20,0% 29,1% 49,1%
Makassar Count 7 6 13
% within Suku 53,8% 46,2% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 29,2% 19,4% 23,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 12,7% 10,9% 23,6%
Toraja Count 0 4 4
% within Suku 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 0,0% 12,9% 7,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 0,0% 7,3% 7,3%
Mandar Count 1 1 2
% within Suku 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
Lainnya Count 5 4 9
% within Suku 55,6% 44,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 20,8% 12,9% 16,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 9,1% 7,3% 16,4%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Suku 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Page 53
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4,293 4 ,368

Likelihood Ratio 5,771 4 ,217

Linear-by-Linear ,211 1 ,646
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 5 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,87.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,063 ,136 -,456 ,650 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,051 ,135 -,371 ,712 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Suku (Bugis
/ Makassar)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Gejala Utama * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 54
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Gejala Utama Batuk Count 5 12 17
% within Gejala Utama 29,4% 70,6% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 20,8% 38,7% 30,9%
Kategorik
% of Total 9,1% 21,8% 30,9%
Batuk darah Count 1 1 2
% within Gejala Utama 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 4,2% 3,2% 3,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 1,8% 1,8% 3,6%
Sesak napas Count 14 8 22
% within Gejala Utama 63,6% 36,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 58,3% 25,8% 40,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 25,5% 14,5% 40,0%
Nyeri dada Count 4 10 14
% within Gejala Utama 28,6% 71,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 16,7% 32,3% 25,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 7,3% 18,2% 25,5%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Gejala Utama 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 6,301 3 ,098

Likelihood Ratio 6,390 3 ,094

Linear-by-Linear ,359 1 ,549
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 2 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,87.

Page 55
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,082 ,130 -,595 ,554
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,031 ,135 -,223 ,825

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Gejala
Utama (Batuk / Batuk
darah)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Stadium Tumor * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 56
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Stadium Tumor T1 Count 1 2 3
% within Stadium Tumor 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 9,1% 8,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 5,4% 8,1%
T2 Count 4 2 6
% within Stadium Tumor 66,7% 33,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 26,7% 9,1% 16,2%
Kategorik
% of Total 10,8% 5,4% 16,2%
T3 Count 6 7 13
% within Stadium Tumor 46,2% 53,8% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 40,0% 31,8% 35,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 16,2% 18,9% 35,1%
T4 Count 4 11 15
% within Stadium Tumor 26,7% 73,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 26,7% 50,0% 40,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 10,8% 29,7% 40,5%
Total Count 15 22 37
% within Stadium Tumor 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 3,131 3 ,372

Likelihood Ratio 3,161 3 ,367

Linear-by-Linear 1,275 1 ,259
Association
N of Valid Cases 37

a. 4 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,22.

Page 57
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,188 ,162 1,133 ,265
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,225 ,159 1,364 ,181

N of Valid Cases 37

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Stadium
Tumor (T1 / T2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Stadium Node * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 58
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Stadium Node N0 Count 4 7 11
% within Stadium Node 36,4% 63,6% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 26,7% 31,8% 29,7%
Kategorik
% of Total 10,8% 18,9% 29,7%
N1 Count 2 2 4
% within Stadium Node 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 13,3% 9,1% 10,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,4% 5,4% 10,8%
N2 Count 3 4 7
% within Stadium Node 42,9% 57,1% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 20,0% 18,2% 18,9%
Kategorik
% of Total 8,1% 10,8% 18,9%
N3 Count 6 9 15
% within Stadium Node 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 40,0% 40,9% 40,5%
Kategorik
% of Total 16,2% 24,3% 40,5%
Total Count 15 22 37
% within Stadium Node 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,246 3 ,970

Likelihood Ratio ,244 3 ,970

Linear-by-Linear ,014 1 ,905
Association
N of Valid Cases 37

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,62.

Page 59
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,020 ,163 -,118 ,907
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,016 ,163 -,096 ,924

N of Valid Cases 37

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Stadium
Node (N0 / N1)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Stadium Metastase * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 60
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Stadium Metastase M0 Count 6 5 11
% within Stadium 54,5% 45,5% 100,0%
Metastase
% within NRF BAL 40,0% 22,7% 29,7%
Kategorik
% of Total 16,2% 13,5% 29,7%
M1a Count 5 9 14
% within Stadium 35,7% 64,3% 100,0%
Metastase
% within NRF BAL 33,3% 40,9% 37,8%
Kategorik
% of Total 13,5% 24,3% 37,8%
M1b Count 3 3 6
% within Stadium 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Metastase
% within NRF BAL 20,0% 13,6% 16,2%
Kategorik
% of Total 8,1% 8,1% 16,2%
M1c Count 1 5 6
% within Stadium 16,7% 83,3% 100,0%
Metastase
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 22,7% 16,2%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 13,5% 16,2%
Total Count 15 22 37
% within Stadium 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%
Metastase
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%

Page 61
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 2,672 3 ,445

Likelihood Ratio 2,829 3 ,419

Linear-by-Linear 1,498 1 ,221
Association
N of Valid Cases 37

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,43.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,204 ,152 1,233 ,226 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,197 ,158 1,189 ,242 c

N of Valid Cases 37

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Stadium
Metastase (M0 / M1a)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Stadium TMN * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 62
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Stadium TMN IB Count 1 0 1
% within Stadium TMN 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 0,0% 2,7%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 0,0% 2,7%
IIA Count 1 0 1
% within Stadium TMN 100,0% 0,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 0,0% 2,7%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 0,0% 2,7%
IIB Count 1 1 2
% within Stadium TMN 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 4,5% 5,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 2,7% 5,4%
IIIA Count 1 2 3
% within Stadium TMN 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 9,1% 8,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 5,4% 8,1%
IIIB Count 1 1 2
% within Stadium TMN 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 4,5% 5,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 2,7% 5,4%
IIIC Count 1 1 2
% within Stadium TMN 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 4,5% 5,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 2,7% 5,4%
IVA Count 8 11 19
% within Stadium TMN 42,1% 57,9% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 53,3% 50,0% 51,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 21,6% 29,7% 51,4%
IVB Count 1 6 7
% within Stadium TMN 14,3% 85,7% 100,0%

Page 63
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
% within NRF BAL 6,7% 27,3% 18,9%
Kategorik
% of Total 2,7% 16,2% 18,9%
Total Count 15 22 37
% within Stadium TMN 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 5,242 7 ,630

Likelihood Ratio 6,218 7 ,515

Linear-by-Linear 2,821 1 ,093
Association
N of Valid Cases 37

a. 14 cells (87,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,41.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,280 ,148 1,725 ,093 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,287 ,149 1,771 ,085 c

N of Valid Cases 37

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Page 64
 Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Stadium
TMN (IB / IIA)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Stadium TMN * NRF BAL Kategorik

Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Stadium TMN I-IIIA Count 4 3 7
% within Stadium TMN 57,1% 42,9% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 26,7% 13,6% 18,9%
Kategorik
% of Total 10,8% 8,1% 18,9%
IIIB-IV Count 11 19 30
% within Stadium TMN 36,7% 63,3% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 73,3% 86,4% 81,1%
Kategorik
% of Total 29,7% 51,4% 81,1%
Total Count 15 22 37
% within Stadium TMN 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%

Page 65
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,987 a 1 ,320
b
Continuity Correction ,320 1 ,571

Likelihood Ratio ,970 1 ,325

Fisher's Exact Test ,408 ,283
Linear-by-Linear ,961 1 ,327
Association
N of Valid Cases 37

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,84.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
Standard Error a Approximate
b
Value Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,163 ,166 ,980 ,334 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,163 ,166 ,980 ,334 c

N of Valid Cases 37

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Stadium 2,303 ,433 12,246
TMN (I-IIIA / IIIB-IV)
For cohort NRF BAL 1,558 ,703 3,453
Kategorik = <= 1.412
For cohort NRF BAL ,677 ,276 1,661
Kategorik = > 1.412
N of Valid Cases 37

PS * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 66
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
PS 1,00 Count 8 11 19
% within PS 42,1% 57,9% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 53,3% 50,0% 51,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 21,6% 29,7% 51,4%
2,00 Count 7 11 18
% within PS 38,9% 61,1% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 46,7% 50,0% 48,6%
Kategorik
% of Total 18,9% 29,7% 48,6%
Total Count 15 22 37
% within PS 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 40,5% 59,5% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,040 a 1 ,842
b
Continuity Correction ,000 1 1,000

Likelihood Ratio ,040 1 ,842

Fisher's Exact Test 1,000 ,554
Linear-by-Linear ,039 1 ,844
Association
N of Valid Cases 37

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,30.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Page 67
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,033 ,164 ,194 ,847
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,033 ,164 ,194 ,847

N of Valid Cases 37

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for PS (1,00 / 1,143 ,307 4,254
2,00)
For cohort NRF BAL 1,083 ,495 2,369
Kategorik = <= 1.412
For cohort NRF BAL ,947 ,557 1,612
Kategorik = > 1.412
N of Valid Cases 37

Status merokok * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 68
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Status merokok Perokok aktif Count 13 13 26
% within Status merokok 50,0% 50,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 54,2% 41,9% 47,3%
Kategorik
% of Total 23,6% 23,6% 47,3%
Perokok pasif Count 3 6 9
% within Status merokok 33,3% 66,7% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 12,5% 19,4% 16,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 10,9% 16,4%
Tidak merokok Count 8 12 20
% within Status merokok 40,0% 60,0% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 33,3% 38,7% 36,4%
Kategorik
% of Total 14,5% 21,8% 36,4%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Status merokok 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%
% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square ,924 2 ,630

Likelihood Ratio ,931 2 ,628

Linear-by-Linear ,499 1 ,480
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 1 cells (16,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,93.

Page 69
 Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R ,096 ,134 ,703 ,485
c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation ,099 ,135 ,727 ,470

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Status
merokok (Perokok aktif /
Perokok pasif)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Indeks Brinkman * NRF BAL Kategorik

Page 70
 Crosstab
NRF BAL Kategorik
<= 1.412 > 1.412 Total
Indeks Brinkman Bukan perokok Count 11 18 29
% within Indeks Brinkman 37,9% 62,1% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 45,8% 58,1% 52,7%

Kategorik
% of Total 20,0% 32,7% 52,7%
Ringan Count 2 5 7
% within Indeks Brinkman 28,6% 71,4% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 8,3% 16,1% 12,7%

Kategorik
% of Total 3,6% 9,1% 12,7%
Sedang Count 3 5 8
% within Indeks Brinkman 37,5% 62,5% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 12,5% 16,1% 14,5%

Kategorik
% of Total 5,5% 9,1% 14,5%
Berat Count 8 3 11
% within Indeks Brinkman 72,7% 27,3% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 33,3% 9,7% 20,0%

Kategorik
% of Total 14,5% 5,5% 20,0%
Total Count 24 31 55
% within Indeks Brinkman 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

% within NRF BAL 100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Kategorik
% of Total 43,6% 56,4% 100,0%

Page 71
 Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4,937 3 ,176

Likelihood Ratio 5,005 3 ,171

Linear-by-Linear 2,820 1 ,093
Association
N of Valid Cases 55

a. 5 cells (62,5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,05.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic
a
Standard Error Approximate
Value Approximate Tb Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R -,229 ,132 -1,709 ,093 c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -,203 ,134 -1,508 ,138 c

N of Valid Cases 55

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate
Value
a
Odds Ratio for Indeks
Brinkman (Bukan perokok /
Ringan)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

Page 72