4 Cardinal Sins of Bridge
4 Cardinal Sins of Bridge
4 Cardinal Sins of Bridge
Philosophical Approach
In Bridge there are many things to learn and to remember. We are often taxed in keeping too
many things straight in our heads. But even more important than remembering any specific
piece of information about how to play bridge is to have the “correct perspective” on the game
– to be able to play bridge with the correct philosophical approach. If you approach each
situation with the same set of philosophies, both you and your partner will be far more
successful.
Much of the philosophical approach that governs your play will depend on your partnership
style – how you like to play the game of bridge! However, there are some core philosophies
that are over-arching to all good bridge players and bridge partnerships. You will find that
taking actions that are in line with these core philosophies will help keep you out of many
difficult situations. Conversely, when you don’t follow these general ideas, you will cause both
you and partner far greater difficulty. Actions that violate these core philosophies of the game
are what I call “The Cardinal Sins of Bridge.”
opponents will guess correctly and sometimes they will not – but the key is that you have made
their lives difficult by making them guess.
If you open the bidding with a weak bid and later bid again (when you have not been invited to
do so by your partner), then you have violated one of the major philosophies of playing bridge -
- “make your opponents guess last.” Additionally, you will have given the opponents an
opportunity to survive (get a good board) when they might have been headed for disaster. If
your hand is so good that you are not going to be happy passing after preempting, then don’t
preempt – either pass or open at the 1-level.
Example
You hold a hand with 8 HCP and 6-1-4-2 distribution. You open the bidding with 2♠ and the
auction progresses from there:
2♠ (3♥) 3♠ (4♥) ??
Your only option is to PASS! You were not invited to bid! Your partner is the captain – he may
want to double 4♥ for all you know. That might have been his only reason for bidding 3♠ in the
first place!
Note: In the vernacular of bridge we call the player on our right “right hand opponent” (or
RHO), and the player on our left “left hand opponent” (or LHO.) When your partner does
something like preempting and bidding again, then he has become your “Center Hand
Opponent!” – try to be a good partner, not another opponent!
Some Philosophical Approaches to playing bridge that are important here – and the violations
of which make this a cardinal sin are:
Get into and out of the auction as quickly as possible with weak hands.
If you can, try to describe your hand in one bid.
Make the opponents guess last.
Help partner make good decisions (don’t be his opponent).
Give partner a chance to make a winning decision.
Example
With 12 HCP and 1-3-4-5 distribution, if you open 1♣ (your longest suit) and partner responds
1♠, you cannot rebid 1NT. 1♣-1♠-1NT shows a balanced (or semi-balanced) hand with 12-14
HCP. Thus, you must either rebid 2♣ (not great), or better yet, open 1♦ and rebid 2♣ (1♦-1♠-
2♣), showing an unbalanced hand with 12-17 HCP.
Some Philosophical Approaches to playing bridge that are important here – and the violations
of which make this a cardinal sin are:
Try to communicate general information (Hand Type) before specific information.
Give partner what he expects or more (keep expectations clear).
Help partner make good decisions (don’t be his opponent).
partner will often compete too high in our short suit – and the doubled contract that will likely
ensue will be very expensive for our side!
Not Getting Your Hand Off Your Chest Early in the Auction
When you don’t bid enough early in the auction you often are faced with having to make
difficult decisions later in the auction – that never leads to winning bridge! Bid early, bid often,
then get out of the way!
Conclusion
Throughout this Lesson Series you will find that I discuss bridge philosophy and use certain
types of reasoning and principles to help govern our decision making processes. Starting your
decision making process off with the right foundation or approach to the game is vital to
making good choices in some of the difficult situations in bridge. I hope that you find the
philosophical approach discussions useful – and that they help you craft a new way to view the
game!