Docucom PDF Trial: Matching Dell
Docucom PDF Trial: Matching Dell
Docucom PDF Trial: Matching Dell
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Do
cu
Matching Dell
Case Commentary by C3
Contents
Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 3
Background ................................................................................................................................................... 4
Problem ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Financial Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 4
al
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Do
cu
Executive Summary
Dell has been incredibly profitable and experienced astounding growth over the last several
years. We are now in 1999 and we must decide if we should buy, sell, or hold Dell stock.
Strategically, Dell has run the table on the market. They have capitalized on a new business
al
model and forged their profits in an industry with very slim profit margins. They benefitted greatly from
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
the expansion of computer use in the late 90s, the explosion of the internet, and the health of the
economy. Dells competitive advantages come from:
Do
cu
easily, and Dell must continue to run its operations tightly if they wish to continue making a profit. Dell
has traditionally targeted its products to a small number of segments. Future success for Dell will
involve breaking into new segments that are controlled by its competitors, IBM and HP.
Financially, Dell is in a very good position. After collecting relevant data, we conclude that the
estimated value of Dell stock is $46.83 per share. Dell has traditionally not paid dividends for a reason.
Our opinion is that the companys earnings will stabilize in 2004. Long term investors of stocks are
encouraged to accumulate the company stock and hold for about four years.
Background
Dell emerged in the mid-1980s, during a period of unimaginable expansion in both the
popularity and purchasing of Personal Computers. During the late 1990s, personal computer purchases
soared as a result of lower prices, easy availability, and the rise of the internet. Just about every family
al
bought a PC for use at home and many jobs began involving computer skills at the work place.
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Consumers were demanding PCs and Dell burst on to the scene with its direct to consumer business
model and grew rapidly. Before Dell, computers were delivered to customers through three channels:
1) Retail Stores
3) Integrated Resellers
Dell quickly exploited a fourth avenue, direct sales to the customer. This strategy enabled Dell
to hold less inventory, improve customer satisfaction, and also increase their ability to provide custom
configured machines in a timely fashion. Previous customizable computers were bought through IBM.
IBM was selling the Model 0, a barebones computer, delivered to an intermediate who would load the
computer with the desired options. This created transportation and logistics costs and increased lead
time. Dells model was a switch in paradigms, and it worked. In 1998, Dell was selling mainly to
businesses and the government (77% of sales). At this time, this segment was purchasing just over 42%
Do
cu
of all PCs in the U.S. Dell began selling to everyday people and their profits soared further.
Problem
Dell has been highly profitable and grown incredibly until this point. Will they continue to be as
profitable and achieve similar levels of growth? Should we buy, sell, or hold Dell stock? The following
Financial Analysis
In FY 1998, Dells Inventory Turnover ratio was 51.78, which was five to ten times higher than
HP, Compaq, and IBM. Only Gateway, which had a similar direct sales network, was close with a ratio of
36.32 (Appendix 1). Dells average Days in Inventory metric was 7.0 days, compared to 10.0 to 70.4 for
their closest competitors. This greatly reduced Dells costs and was a key to their early success.
Dells sales growth from 1991 to 1992 was explosive at an annual rate of 126.29% with a profit
margin of 6%. The yearly return on assets was 9.11% during this period. Dell was however losing money
al
reducing the profit margins to 5% in 1993 as sales increased by an annual rate of 42.65%. Dell
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
experienced stiff competition in price cuts on computers sales from Gateway and other Computer
makers, which resulted in a decline of the sales growth of 20.95% and a loss of over 1%. Dell reacted to
its immediate growth by restructuring its divisions by putting customers into categories of larger and
smaller firms initially, and then by globally accounts of each division. The increase in sales averaged
51.44% over the next four years. The strategic changes paid off with an increase in profit margin of 4%
and 5% in 1995 and 1996 respectively and 7% and 8% in 1997 and 1998 respectively. The return on
assets, averaged 21.68% annually in 98-99, was positively correlated with the increased profit margins.
Investors showed confidence in Dell market value by acquiring the stock, causing the price to
rise. The company management wished to keep the stock price in ranges affordable to all investors.
The stock price was split 2-1 five times but continued to increase at an average monthly rate of 17.2%
Do
cu
during the period between 12/2/1996 to 03/08/1999. The price increase was positively correlated with
the Company Earnings. This profit margin data is tabulated in Appendix 2 and the stock in Appendix 3.
The Corporate earnings were $0.65 per share in December 1999 but earnings were based on
more shares outstanding. Dell has room for growth particularly among new buyers who did not own a
computer as well as repeat buyers wishing to replace old models with the new models with the latest
technology. Computer technology has been changing rapidly during the past decade and is expected to
continue likewise. Dell should continue on investing in research and development in order to keep up
with the new technology introduced by hardware makers. Software and hardware continues to change,
and Dell will always be able to sell the new equipment to people wanting an upgrade. Dell will however
be able to control their profit margins since the company builds computers after receiving orders from
the customers unlike other companies that forecast demand and build units with no committed buyer.
al
The Personal Computer industry has suffered from increasing sales and dwindling profits. There
was only a small demand for computers during the early 1990s and when the demand started to grow
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
in the mid 1990s, the producers faced increasing competition and decreasing prices. The first factor for
declining prices was increase competition at several levels. There were many firms selling PCs to
consumers and there were many firms making components and selling them to the companies such as
Dell. Computer component prices typically fell 25-30% each year.
The second factor in the decline of prices was the expectations of the customer. Dell helped
drive down the cost of computers by making its operations as lean as possible, and then offering direct
sales to the customer. For many competitors, this caused a rapid attempt to change their operating
structure. HP launched the HP Shopping Village, Compaq launched their Optimized Distribution Model
(ODM), and IBM started their Authorized Assembly Program (AAP). They wanted to copy Dell.
A third factor was the relative ease required to enter the market. Capital requirements to set up
Do
cu
an assembly line to produce PC's are also relatively low and assembly is not very complicated.
Another factor of price decline was that the capabilities of the components were advancing so
rapidly that a large inventory of older parts could easily become obsolete before they were all sold.
Prices for older systems would plummet when new ones were introduced.
manufacturers, whose strategy it was to stock computers and parts for quick delivery, holding a near
worthless inventory when newer components were released. In 1998, computer prices fell by an
estimated 1% every week.
Segment Analysis
In 1998, Dell defined 4 major markets for the industry. Their market share percentage in dollars
and units is shown in the table below.
% of Market
Share (Units)
38.5%
23.3%
33.7%
5.8%
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
% of Market
Share (Dollars)
42.3%
23.7%
28.7%
5.4%
al
Segment
All of these market segments held some advantage over the industry. The most influential of the
segments was the large to midsized businesses and government. The financial market share of this
segment was higher than the unit share, resulting in the trend for prices for this segment staying higher
than for other segments. Manufacturers had to commit for a long term of warranty and replacement
parts to lure business. In the home consumers segment, the reverse situation exists; the unit share is
larger than the financial share. This segment is price sensitive. This segment typically purchased
computers infrequently (transactional customers, as Dell categorized them) they had no shifting costs
(to change brands) nor did they have loyalty to a special brand. This segment typically bought from the
Do
cu
lowest priced manufacturer. In 1998, 30% of this segment was first time buyers.
Dells business strategy involved receiving orders directly from customers and avoiding
distribution channels. This enabled Dell to attain cost leadership and competitive advantage in the PC
market. The decision to eliminate wholesale and retail dealers proved to be a significant cost cutting
measure. It also provided for a less expensive and efficient way of distribution and production of
computers. Furthermore the direct model also gave Dell a better understanding of their customers, as
their sales team remained in close contact with them, versus their resellers and distributors.
Dell was able to accomplish this by aligning and integrating their supply chain directly with
customer expectations. The company built highly integrated and efficient external and internal sales
forces. The external sales force was entrusted with the responsibilities of understanding customer
expectations and making sure that each and every aspect of the PC was build according to customer
al
specifications, and concentrated on Relationship Customers, while the internal sales force
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
concentrated on the Transactional Customer, and focused on providing information to callers to the
Dell phone hotline.
The competitive advantage they held over the competition is difficult to quantify. In general,
Dells competitive advantage is derived from 3 sources, namely:
Do
cu
1998, this advantage was 6% to 29% in both markets (although Dell temporarily lost competitive
advantage against Gateway in 1998).
Dells Weaknesses include their small market share in the workstation and business server
market. They also need to fight declining PC prices and the easy entry by competitive firms.
Dells Opportunities are areas for Dell to expand. They have saturated their existing markets and they
need to find new markets to sell their PCs. Additionally, Dell can try to develop new products for its
existing markets and to try to break into the workstation market and sell service contracts.
Dells Threats include more copycat firms, saturated markets, and the problems created from
trying to maintain their corporate culture. A graphical breakdown of the SWOT analysis is in Appendix 6.
Out of this era emerged Dell; profitable and excelling in an industry that faced declining profits.
From 1995 to 1998, Dells profit margin increased, from 4.29% to 7.66%. By comparison, Compaq
slipped from 5.35% to a net loss, and Gateway from 4.71% to 4.5%. IBM increased slightly and HP
decreased slightly as corporations, but these companies were much more diversified. In 1998, IBM and
al
HPs computer business accounted for 20% and 25% (respectively) of their entire business. These two
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
companies are not pure play comparators because the computer business accounted for a much smaller
percentage of overall revenue than the 90% for Dell, Compaq, and Gateway.
Conclusion
Dell has created tremendous value over a long period of time. At this point, it is a mature
company with fewer growth prospects than it previously had. A large majority of the customers who
wanted a personal computer have purchased one. Dell needs to figure out if there are additional
computing products that they can sell to existing markets. Dells future growth also relies upon finding
new markets for personal computers. Additionally, Dells growth relies upon it breaking into the
workstation and server market that is held tightly by HP and IBM. These opportunities will
We do not recommend Dell stock because we feel there are other companies that will give a better
Do
cu
After collecting relevant data and make needed computations, an estimate of the market value
of Dell Inc. was completed. The estimated value was $46.83 per share*. Our opinion is that the
companys earnings will stabilize in 2004. Long term investors of stocks are encouraged to accumulate
the company stock and hold for about four years. Dell has traditionally not paid dividends for a reason.
Management is confident of the corporations performance and continues to invest retained earnings.
GM / Revenue NI / Rev
23%
8%
37.20%
-8.80%
57.80%
-4.40%
31.90%
6.30%
20.20%
4.50%
Inventory Turnover
51.78
10.66
7.38
5.19
36.32
al
Dell
Compaq
IBM
HP
Gateway
Ratio Analysis
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
FY 1998
1995
5.35%
4.29%
4.71%
7.72%
5.81%
1996
0.07%
5.14%
4.99%
6.73%
7.15%
1997
7.55%
6.68%
1.75%
7.27%
7.76%
1998
-8.80%
7.66%
4.52%
6.26%
7.75%
Do
cu
% Change
Between
Splits
Average
Monthly
Rate
Stock
Price
Date of
Split
Stock
Price
%
Change
12/02/1996
$113.50
12/09/1996
$60.50
1.65%
07/25/1997
$163.50
07/28/1997
$78.87
-0.88%
170.2%
7.60
22.4%
03/06/1998
$138.50
03/09/1998
$63.13
-2.21%
75.6%
7.37
10.3%
09/04/1998
$109.50
09/08/1998
$59.94
2.37%
73.5%
5.97
12.3%
03/05/1999
$145.38
03/08/1999
$86.00
4.58%
142.5%
5.93
24.0%
Date Before
Split
No of Months
Between Event
17.2%
Competitor
Price
Gross
Margin
Dell
Compaq
HP
$
$
$
2,848
3,299
3,198
22.5%
31.4%
31.9%
Gateway
2,439
20.2%
20%
$
$
$
2,555
3,077
3,497
Gateway
2,208
22.5%
31.4%
31.9%
9%
9%
6%
6%
10.05
9%
6%
20%
20.2%
1.00%
7.05
34.22
70.38
9%
9%
6%
6%
10.05
9%
6%
cuC
Dell
Compaq
HP
7.05
34.22
70.38
Do
Competitor
Price
Gross
Margin
ww o
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
ia
1.00%
COGS
(Per Unit)
JIT Purchase of
Components
(Savings - Lower
COGS result from
JIT purchasing)
Lower
Inventory
Costs
No
Channel
Related
Costs
No
Channel
Markup
Dell
Dell
Advantage
Advantage
/ Price
$ 2,207.20
$ 2,263.11
$ 2,177.84
55.914
-29.362
$
$
32.87
76.59
$ 170.88
$ 170.88
$ 198.65
$ 198.65
$
$
458.31
416.76
16%
15%
$ 1,946.32
-260.878
3.63
$ 170.88
$ 198.65
112.28
4%
Lower
Inventory
Costs
No
Channel
Related
Costs
No
Channel
Markup
Dell
Dell
Advantage
Advantage
/ Price
COGS
(Per Unit)
JIT Purchase of
Components
(Savings)
$ 1,980.13
$ 2,110.82
$ 2,381.46
130.697
401.332
$
$
29.49
68.71
$ 153.30
$ 153.30
$ 178.21
$ 178.21
$
$
491.69
801.56
19%
31%
$ 1,761.98
-218.141
3.26
$ 153.30
$ 178.21
116.63
5%
Competito
r
Price
Dell
Compaq
HP
Gateway
$
$
$
$
1,838
2,448
2,459
1,825
Gross
Margin
22.5%
31.4%
31.9%
20.2%
20%
$
$
$
$
2,023
2,040
2,400
1,499
22.5%
31.4%
31.9%
20.2%
20%
7.05
34.22
70.38
10.05
cuC
Dell
Compaq
HP
Gateway
7.05
34.22
70.38
10.05
9%
9%
9%
Do
Competito
r
Price
Gross
Margin
ww o
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
ia
9%
9%
9%
6%
6%
6%
1.00%
6%
6%
6%
1.00%
COGS
(Per Unit)
$
$
$
$
1,424.45
1,679.33
1,674.58
1,456.35
COGS
(Per Unit)
$
$
$
$
1,567.83
1,399.44
1,634.40
1,196.20
JIT Purchase of
Components
(Savings - Lower
COGS result from
JIT purchasing)
254.878
250.129
31.9
JIT Purchase of
Components
(Savings)
-168.385
66.575
-371.623
No
Channel
Related
Costs
No
Channel
Markup
Dell
Dell
Advantage
Advantage
/ Price
21.21
49.43
2.34
$ 110.28
$ 110.28
$ 110.28
$ 128.20
$ 128.20
$ 128.20
$
$
$
Lower
Inventory
Costs
No
Channel
Related
Costs
No
Channel
Markup
Dell
Dell
Advantage
Advantage
/ Price
$ 121.38
$ 121.38
$ 121.38
$ 141.10
$ 141.10
$ 141.10
$ 117.45
$ 383.46
$ (106.56)
Lower
Inventory
Costs
$
$
$
$
$
$
23.35
54.41
2.58
514.57
538.04
272.72
28%
29%
15%
6%
19%
-5%
ww o
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
ia
Strengths:
Just In Time
Direct to Consumer
Brand Image
Weaknesses:
Workstation Market
Declining PC Prices
cuC
Opportunities:
Threats:
Copycats
Saturated Markets
Service Contracts
Maintaining Culture
Do
DuPont Analysis
Sales
Total Assets
Total Equity
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
51
102
-36
149
272
518
944
1460
890
2014
2873
3475
5296
7759
12327
18243
560
927
1140
1594
2148
2993
4268
6877
274
369
471
652
973
1085
1293
2321
19%
28%
-8%
23%
28%
48%
73%
63%
6%
5%
-1%
4%
5%
7%
8%
8%
159%
217%
252%
218%
247%
259%
289%
265%
204%
251%
242%
244%
221%
276%
330%
296%
9.11%
11.00%
-3.16%
9.35%
12.66%
17.31%
22.12%
21.23%
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Net Income
1992
al
DuPont Identity
Operating Efficiency
(Profit Margin)
Equity Multiplier
(Financial Leverage)
Do
cu
Return on Assets
2002
2003
2004
18,243
27,000
39,959
59,140
87,527
G ros s Margin
4,106
6,077
8,994
13,311
19,700
S G &A
1,788
2,646
3,916
5,796
8,579
272
403
596
882
1,305
Net Income
Net C as hflows
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
R es earch & D ev
al
R evenue
2001
2,046
Dis c R ate)
3,028
4,482
6,633
9,816
157,736
2,046
3,028
4,482
6,633
167,553
0.9140
0.8354
0.7635
0.6979
0.6378
1,870
2,530
3,422
4,629
106,873
$119,323
Market Value
2548
$46.83
S hares
Do
cu
9,816 x
1 + .03
0.0941 -
0.03
10,111
0.0641
$157,736
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Percent of
1999 Sales
890
2,014
2,873
3,475
5,296
7,759
12,327
18,243
100.0%
Gross Margin
282
449
433
738
1,067
1,666
2,722
4,106
22.5%
SG&A
182
268
423
424
595
826
1,202
1,788
9.8%
33
42
49
65
95
126
204
272
1.5%
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
al
Revenue
69
139
(39)
249
377
714
1,316
2,046
11.2%
Net Income
51
102
(36)
149
272
518
944
1,460
8.0%
Do
cu
Operating Income
337.0
410.8
220.3
80.3
1,048.4
527.2
538.0
292.9
112.2
1,470.4
646.0
726.0
429.0
156.0
1,957.0
1,352.0
903.0
251.0
241.0
2,747.0
1997
1,844.0
1,486.0
233.0
249.0
3,812.0
1998
3,181.0
2,481.0
273.0
404.0
6,339.0
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
95.3
374.0
303.2
80.2
852.8
1996
al
1992
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Inventory
Other Current Assets
Total Current Assets
Fixed Assets
PPE
Investments
Intangible Assets
Other Assets
Total Assets
BALANCE SHEET
1993
1994
1995
Debt-to-Asset Ratio
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
Current Ratio
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Current Ratio
4,132.0
2,678.0
391.0
480.0
7,681.0
70.4
3.8
927.0
86.9
5.2
1,140.5
117.0
6.7
1,594.0
179.0
12.0
2,148.0
235.0
11.0
2,993.0
342.0
14.0
4,168.0
523.0
15.0
6,877.0
765.0
2,721.0
304.0
11,471.0
8.5
295.1
27.2
163.0
494
48.4
15.6
369.2
927
282.7
17.6
237.7
538
100.0
31.4
0.013
471.1
1,140
0.4
447.1
24.9
279.0
751
113.4
77.4
0.013
651.7
1,594
60.0
466.0
413.0
939
113.0
123.0
0.001
973.0
2,148
27.0
1,040.0
591.0
1,658
18.0
232.0
279.000
806.0
2,993
146.0
1,643.0
908.0
2,697
17.0
261.0
1,293.0
4,268
2,397.0
1,298.0
3,695
512.0
349.0
2,321.0
6,877
3,538.0
1,654.0
5,192
508.0
463.0
5,308.0
11,471
2.59
(1.06)
3.15
2.65
2.70
2.56
1.05
2622
2517
0.61
2548
157
149
166
51.0
2.59
19.7
19
102.0
(1.06)
(96.2)
(96)
(36.0)
3.15
(11.4)
(11)
149.0
2.65
56.2
56
272.0
2.70
100.7
100
518.0
2.56
202.3
202
944.0
1.05
899.0
899
1,460.0
0.61
2,393.4
2,393
64.0
927.0
131.4
1140.5
190.9
1594.0
236.0
2148.0
250.0
2993.0
278.0
4168.0
861.0
6877.0
971.0
11471.0
6.90%
11.52%
11.97%
10.99%
8.35%
6.67%
12.52%
8.46%
64.0
369.2
0.173
131.4
471.1
0.279
190.9
651.7
0.293
236.0
973.0
0.243
250.0
1085.0
0.230
278.0
1293.0
0.215
861.0
2321.0
0.371
971.0
5308.0
0.183
times
times
times
times
times
times
times
times
1,470.4
751.4
1.96
1,957.0
939.0
2.08
Do
cu
1999
852.8
493.8
1.73
1,048.4
538.0
1.95
194
192
2,747.0
1,658.0
1.66
3,812.0
2,697.0
1.41
6,339.0
3,695.0
1.72
7,681.0
5,192.0
1.48
PPE
Investments
Intangible Assets
Other Assets
Liabilities
Source
3,181.0
2,481.0
273.0
404.0
6,339.0
523.0
15.0
538.0
4,132.0
2,678.0
391.0
480.0
7,681.0
765.0
2,721.0
304.0
3,790.0
15.0
15.0
2,397.0
1,298.0
3,695.0
861.0
349.0
1,210.0
3,538.0
1,654.0
5,192.0
971.0
463.0
1,434.0
1,141.0
356.0
1,497.0
110.0
114.0
224.0
Use
951.0
197.0
118.0
76.0
1,342.0
242.0
2,721.0
304.0
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Assets
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Inventory
Other Current Assets
1998
al
1998
Debt/Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Income Tax Payable
Other Current Liabilities
Long Term Debt
Other Liabilities
$1,736.0
$4,609.0
Do
cu
Net Source/Use
3,267.0
1992
Net Sales
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
126.29%
42.65%
20.95%
52.40%
46.51%
58.87%
47.99%
Forecast
48.00
Cash
10.71%
16.73%
18.35%
18.59%
25.53%
23.77%
25.81%
22.65% 23.00
Accounts Receivable
42.02%
20.40%
18.73%
20.89%
17.05%
19.15%
20.13%
14.68% 15.00
Inventory
34.07%
10.94%
10.20%
12.35%
4.74%
3.00%
2.21%
2.14%
2.14
9.02%
3.99%
3.91%
4.49%
4.55%
3.21%
3.28%
2.63%
2.63
Accounts Payable
33.16%
14.04%
15.56%
13.41%
19.64%
21.18%
19.45%
Net Income
34.07%
10.94%
10.20%
12.35%
4.74%
3.00%
2.21%
19.39% 19.40
2.14%
2.15
0.044530395
R S quare
0.001982956
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Multiple R
-0.01971307
S tandard E rror
0.045946667
O bs ervations
ANO V A
48
df
R egres s ion
R es idual
T otal
al
SS
0.00019295 0.000192948
46
0.09711042 0.002111096
47
0.09730337
Intercept
S ignificance F
0.0913972 0.76377113
t S tat
P -value
0.014929
0.010840
1.377214
0.175111
(0.006891) 0.036748
0.989788
3.273978
0.302320
0.763771
(5.600388) 7.579964
Do
cu
X Variable 1
MS
Pre-Tax
After Tax
5.36%
Cost of Equity
Cost of Capital
0.99
7.53%
7.53%
65.00%
4.89%
4.09%
9.41%
Risk Premium
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
7.53%
al
4.89%
19.52%
9.41%
80.48%
8.53%
Amount of Debt
236
1209
19.5%
Amount of Equity
973
1209
80.5%
Capitalization
1209
100.0%
9.45%
8.20%
7.86%
7.86%
7.22%
7.02%
7.02%
7.53%
4.09%
Bi
Ba3
Baa1
Baa1
A3
A3
5.36% =
Do
cu
Discount Rate
Risk free
Rate
=(
5.36% )+(
0.99
Market Rate
Beta
)(
9.45%
5.36%
9.41%
Close
636.01
640.43
645.5
654.18
669.14
670.64
639.95
651.99
687.31
705.27
757.02
761.75
794.67
817.68
814.9
804.13
851.87
902.09
957.73
964.17
960.59
983.12
964.55
716.69
729.55
773.43
756.13
733.54
793.21
838.82
884.54
893.34
899.47
855.27
900.61
757.02
740.74
786.16
790.82
757.12
801.34
848.28
885.14
954.29
899.47
950.92
914.62
740.74
786.16
790.82
757.12
801.34
848.28
885.2
954.31
899.47
947.28
914.62
955.3984
986.25
992.65
1,051.66
1,113.07
1,132.98
1,130.52
1,145.15
1,190.58
1,121.79
1,066.11
1,103.78
1,192.97
924.92
912.83
980.28
1,030.87
1,076.70
1,074.39
1,074.67
1,119.44
957.42
939.98
923.32
1,098.67
955.4
970.43
980.28
1,049.34
1,101.75
1,111.75
1,090.82
1,133.84
1,120.67
957.28
1,017.01
1,098.67
970.43
980.28
1,049.34
1,101.76
1,111.75
1,090.82
1,133.86
1,120.73
957.43
1,017.06
1,098.69
1,163.70
1,244.93
1,280.40
1,283.91
1,323.88
1,371.67
1,375.98
1,372.93
1,420.14
1,382.75
1,361.39
1,373.18
1,425.31
1,136.89
1,207.83
1,213.50
1,216.03
1,282.55
1,277.31
1,277.51
1,328.49
1,267.73
1,256.29
1,245.39
1,346.48
1,175.28
1,229.23
1,275.93
1,238.33
1,286.37
1,335.18
1,301.84
1,372.71
1,328.72
1,320.41
1,282.71
1,362.93
1,229.40
1,279.64
1,238.33
1,286.41
1,335.18
1,301.85
1,372.86
1,328.72
1,320.41
1,287.53
1,363.27
1,389.41
12/31/1999
1,473.16
1,387.44
Average Rate from 1993 to 1999
1,388.91
1,469.25
1/31/1996
2/29/1996
3/29/1996
4/30/1996
5/31/1996
6/28/1996
7/31/1996
8/30/1996
9/30/1996
10/31/1996
11/29/1996
12/31/1996
1/31/1997
2/28/1997
3/31/1997
4/30/1997
5/30/1997
6/30/1997
7/31/1997
8/29/1997
9/30/1997
10/31/1997
11/28/1997
Do
cu
12/31/1997
1/30/1998
2/27/1998
3/31/1998
4/30/1998
5/29/1998
6/30/1998
7/31/1998
8/31/1998
9/30/1998
10/30/1998
11/30/1998
12/31/1998
1/29/1999
2/26/1999
3/31/1999
4/30/1999
5/28/1999
6/30/1999
7/30/1999
8/31/1999
9/30/1999
10/29/1999
11/30/1999
Change
20.08
4.42
5.07
8.68
14.96
1.5
-30.69
12.04
35.32
17.96
51.75
-16.28
45.42
4.66
-33.7
44.22
46.94
36.92
69.11
-54.84
47.81
-32.66
40.7784
al
low
597.29
633.71
627.63
624.14
630.07
658.75
605.88
639.49
643.97
684.44
701.3
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
High
636.18
664.23
656.97
656.68
681.1
680.32
675.88
670.68
690.88
714.1
762.12
15.0316
1.57%
9.85
1.02%
69.06
7.04%
52.42
5.00%
9.99
0.91%
-20.93
-1.88%
43.04
3.95%
-13.13
-1.16%
-163.3
-14.57%
59.63
6.23%
81.63
8.03%
65.01
5.92%
65.7
5.65%
50.24
4.09%
-41.31
-3.23%
48.08
3.88%
48.77
3.79%
-33.33
-2.50%
71.01
5.45%
-44.14
-3.22%
-8.31
-0.63%
-32.88
-2.49%
75.74
5.88%
26.14
1.92%
79.84
5.75%
0.37786543 4 =
9.96%
10.09%
7.22%
9.45%
10/1/1996
11/1/1996
12/2/1996
1/2/1997
2/3/1997
3/3/1997
4/1/1997
5/1/1997
6/2/1997
7/1/1997
al
77.37
81.50
101.75
53.13
66.62
71.12
66.75
84.12
114.00
117.69
88.75
102.62
115.00
72.37
76.00
75.62
85.25
115.75
123.50
173.50
75.62
76.87
51.00
49.88
59.88
60.75
66.12
83.62
102.62
77.00
81.37
101.62
53.13
66.12
71.12
67.62
83.69
112.50
117.44
85.50
123206200
144458500
123662200
85929700
110294300
86682900
91510200
117646300
98290900
119329700
2.5
3.2
3.3
4.1
4.5
4.2
5.2
7.0
7.3
10.7
86.50
83.00
98.00
82.12
85.56
84.81
101.12
141.75
68.00
81.87
81.31
94.12
108.00
102.62
63.13
66.56
59.63
74.87
101.87
80.06
41.69
41.63
34.44
37.06
40.38
48.25
40.13
40.00
42.81
88.12
101.25
103.87
87.25
96.25
101.06
140.38
143.88
81.37
98.50
95.56
118.25
129.38
115.50
66.31
73.50
75.81
100.37
110.00
87.50
48.98
45.06
39.44
44.63
49.06
49.94
46.50
45.13
53.97
75.00
82.87
73.00
70.00
75.25
79.37
100.87
61.00
62.63
80.75
77.25
90.00
98.25
53.00
40.75
59.88
59.56
73.44
77.37
35.38
35.38
32.88
31.37
35.75
37.56
41.75
37.38
39.31
40.50
82.06
96.87
80.12
84.19
84.00
99.44
139.88
67.75
80.75
82.41
92.81
108.59
100.00
65.75
65.50
60.81
73.19
100.00
80.12
40.88
41.19
34.44
37.00
40.88
48.81
41.81
40.13
43.00
51.00
68189700
55297200
82255200
83280700
79134200
80488800
90542000
77806500
43955900
79697300
61258700
71408500
102322700
73222300
77984800
51471400
31833800
39935100
79858400
41653600
30127200
31323000
23566700
22462900
32116500
25101000
27142500
29162900
28781800
10.3
12.1
10.0
10.5
10.5
12.4
17.5
16.9
20.2
20.6
23.2
27.2
25.0
32.9
32.8
30.4
36.6
50.0
40.1
40.9
41.2
34.4
37.0
40.9
48.8
41.8
40.1
43.0
51.0
Do
cu
8/1/1997
9/2/1997
10/1/1997
11/3/1997
12/1/1997
1/2/1998
2/2/1998
3/2/1998
4/1/1998
5/1/1998
6/1/1998
7/1/1998
8/3/1998
9/1/1998
10/1/1998
11/2/1998
12/1/1998
1/4/1999
2/1/1999
3/1/1999
4/1/1999
5/3/1999
6/1/1999
7/1/1999
8/2/1999
9/1/1999
10/1/1999
11/1/1999
12/1/1999
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
Da te
Open
Hi gh
1/3/1995
40.88
2/1/1995
43.00
3/1/1995
41.88
4/3/1995
43.63
5/1/1995
54.63
6/1/1995
50.63
7/3/1995
60.25
8/1/1995
65.00
9/1/1995
76.50
10/2/1995
85.00
11/1/1995
46.25
12/1/1995
44.00
1/2/1996
35.38
2/1/1996
27.00
3/1/1996
32.13
4/1/1996
34.13
5/1/1996
45.75
6/3/1996
55.25
7/1/1996
51.13
8/1/1996
55.38
9/3/1996
65.87
636.01
640.43
645.5
654.18
669.14
670.64
639.95
651.99
687.31
705.27
757.02
740.74
786.16
790.82
757.12
801.34
848.28
885.2
954.31
899.47
947.28
914.62
955.3984
970.43
980.28
1,049.34
1,101.76
1,111.75
1,090.82
1,133.86
1,120.73
957.43
1,017.06
1,098.69
1,163.70
1,229.40
1,279.64
1,238.33
1,286.41
1,335.18
1,301.85
1,372.86
1,328.72
1,320.41
1,287.53
1,363.27
1,389.41
1,469.25
0.006934
0.007917
0.013431
0.022853
0.002257
-0.045748
0.018814
0.054203
0.026101
0.073376
-0.021505
0.061317
0.005928
-0.042614
0.058406
0.058577
0.043453
0.078146
-0.057466
0.053154
-0.034478
0.044587
0.015732
0.010150
0.070449
0.049946
0.009076
-0.018826
0.039438
-0.011615
-0.145797
0.062396
0.080294
0.059126
0.056375
0.041009
-0.032283
0.038794
0.037944
-0.024970
0.054438
-0.032046
-0.006254
-0.028552
0.062539
0.019062
0.057844
-0.050904
42.63
41.5
43.75
54.75
50.38
60.13
65
77
85
46.63
44.25
34.63
27.37
34.38
33.5
45.88
55.38
50.88
55.5
67.12
77.75
81.37
101.62
53.13
66.12
71.12
67.62
83.69
112.5
117.44
85.5
82.06
96.87
80.12
84.19
84
99.44
139.88
67.75
80.75
82.41
92.81
108.59
100
65.75
65.5
60.81
73.19
Dell's Returns
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.008
0.006
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
ww Co
w.p m
dfw P
iza D
rd. F
com Tr
i
al
S&P Index
Returns
Do
cu
1/31/1996
2/29/1996
3/29/1996
4/30/1996
5/31/1996
6/28/1996
7/31/1996
8/30/1996
9/30/1996
10/31/1996
11/29/1996
12/31/1996
1/31/1997
2/28/1997
3/31/1997
4/30/1997
5/30/1997
6/30/1997
7/31/1997
8/29/1997
9/30/1997
10/31/1997
11/28/1997
12/31/1997
1/30/1998
2/27/1998
3/31/1998
4/30/1998
5/29/1998
6/30/1998
7/31/1998
8/31/1998
9/30/1998
10/30/1998
11/30/1998
12/31/1998
1/29/1999
2/26/1999
3/31/1999
4/30/1999
5/28/1999
6/30/1999
7/30/1999
8/31/1999
9/30/1999
10/29/1999
11/30/1999
12/31/1999