10-GCC-Annexure-A Performance Reports
10-GCC-Annexure-A Performance Reports
10-GCC-Annexure-A Performance Reports
1.0 The feedback shall be based on records, evidences and documents (hindrance
register, DPR, monthly PRT MoM, contractor's MPR, etc). Due diligence shall be taken
to capture the actual progress, hindrances, if any from the monthly progress report to
be submitted by the concerned agency. As Daily Progress Report / Weekly Progress
Report / Monthly Progress Report are key documents / inputs for Vendor Performance
measurement. Non-submission of the aforesaid documents may also be reckoned as
poor performance.
3.0 This vendor performance rating system is applicable for a particular package being
executed by the vendor. If the same vendor is executing multiple packages in a project
or at number of NTPC projects, the performance report shall be prepared package
wise and the screening committee may then take a final view for evaluating the overall
performance of the vendor before initiating action for issuance of Notice for
Withholding of business dealings with the concerned contractor, in case the
performance is found unsatisfactory.
Page 1 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
* For (iii) & (iv) above - If all drawings/documents due for approval are approved
in Cat-I/IV within approval schedule, then marks allocated against (iii) & (iv)
above shall be clubbed for calculation purpose.
** In case no “DR” proposal is submitted and orders are placed on already
approved vendors, then full marks shall be given for calculation purpose against
item (v).
Page 2 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
Page 3 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
*If Major & Minor Bought out items are not separately identified in L-2 network then both
shall be clubbed into single line item with Max score of 25.
Note: Overall % of actual progress vis-à-vis L2 schedule in Col (B) shall be arrived
in the following manner:
(i) Let there be n type of Items/systems identified in L2/Quantified L2
schedule i.e. E1, E2, E3 …..En.
(ii) Let % progress for each type of Item/system vis-à-vis L2 schedule be %E1,
%E2, %E3……%En.
(iii) Overall % in Col (B) = (%E1+ %E2+ %E3……+%En)/n
Page 4 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
Page 5 of 10
Note: For Physical Progress, overall % of actual progress vis-à-vis quantified L2
schedule in Col (B) shall be arrived in the following manner (Unit of measurement
shall be as per approved BBU for respective activities):
(i) Let there be n category of works identified in L-2/Quantified L2 schedule i.e.
W1, W2, W3 …..Wn.
(ii) Let % progress for each category of work vis-à-vis L2 schedule
be %W1, %W2, %W3……%Wn.
(iii) Overall %in Col (B) = (%W1+ %W2+ %W3……+%Wn)/n
Note:
• All incidences shall be relevant to the current performance evaluation cycle.
• In case of delay in front (including construction drawings for civil packages and
other inputs, if any) release by NTPC, measurement of delay in execution by the
contractor shall be normalized proportionally.
• Contractor will have to submit monthly progress report capturing actual physical
progress viv-a-vis L2 schedule and delay in hand over of front by NTPC, if any. In
case of front delay the same has to be jointly signed by NTPC engineer & Vendor.
Page 6 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
Page 7 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
Page 8 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
Page 9 of 10
PROJECT
PACKAGE
CONTRACTOR
PACKAGE AWARD DATE
PACKAGE COMPLETION DATE
Note: In case of Civil Contracts, score of Engineering & QA and Supply shall be NIL
and weightage of Construction/Installation shall be 0.60.
Performance Rating
Page 10 of 10