Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/21 October/November 2020
Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/21 October/November 2020
Cambridge IGCSE™: First Language English 0500/21 October/November 2020
com
Cambridge IGCSE™
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2020 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Note: All Examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the passage.
Question 1
This question tests the following writing assessment objectives (25 marks):
Write the speech you give to your school community, giving your views.
Base your speech on what you have read in both texts, but be careful to
use your own words. Address both of the bullet points.
1 Notes on task:
Text A
Text B
• passion of audience
• powerful force: on a level with traditional sporting events / nations
• live and interactive: access to stars / can post own streams
• finance: attractive to advertisers / global brands
• diversity of audience
• aspirational
Text A
1 Text B
Table A, Writing
3 10–13 • Inconsistent style, expression sometimes awkward but meaning clear. (W1)
• Relies on the sequence of the original text. (W2)
• Vocabulary is simple, limited in range or reliant on the original text. (W3)
• Some awareness of an appropriate register for audience and purpose. (W4)
• Frequent errors of spelling, punctuation and grammar, sometimes serious.
(W5)
0 0 • No creditable content.
Table B, Reading
6 13–15 • Successfully evaluates ideas and opinions, both explicit and implicit. (R1,
R2, R3)
• Assimilates ideas from the text to give a developed, sophisticated response.
(R3, R5)
5 10–12 • Some successful evaluation of ideas and opinions, both explicit and implicit.
(R1, R2, R3)
• A thorough response, supported by a detailed selection of relevant ideas
from the text. (R3, R5)
4 7–9 • Begins to evaluate mainly explicit ideas and opinions. (R1, R2, R3)
• An appropriate response that includes relevant ideas from the text. (R3, R5)
3 5–6 • Selects and comments on explicit ideas and opinions. (R1, R2, R3)
• Makes a general response including a few relevant ideas from the text. (R3,
R5)
1 1–2 • Very limited response with minimal relation to the text. (R1, R2, R3, R5)
0 0 • No creditable content.
Section B: Composition
Questions 2, 3, 4 or 5
2 EITHER 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
3 OR 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
4 OR 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
5 OR 40
Use Table A to give a mark out of 16 for content and structure, and Table B to
give a mark out of 24 for style and accuracy.
6 14–16 General
• Content is complex, engaging and effective. (W1)
• Structure is secure, well balanced and carefully managed for deliberate
effect. (W2)
5 11–13 General
• Content is developed, engaging and effective. (W1)
• Structure is well managed, with some choices made for deliberate
effect. (W2)
4 8–10 General
• Content is relevant with some development. (W1)
• Structure is competently managed. (W2)
3 5–7 General
• Content is straightforward and briefly developed. (W1)
• Structure is mostly organised but may not always be effective. (W2)
2 3–4 General
• Content is simple, and ideas and events may be limited. (W1)
• Structure is partially organised but limited in its effect. (W2)
1 1–2 General
• Content is occasionally relevant or clear. (W1)
• Structure is limited and ineffective. (W2)
0 0 • No creditable content.
0 0 • No creditable content.