GD Report

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

IS GST REALLY A ONE NATION , ONE TAX SYSTEM ?

Swetha Suresh Kumar


BBA LLB (Sem 9)

INTRODUCTION

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is an indirect tax that has fundamentally changed the

taxation landscape in India. The notion of introducing a unified Goods and Services Tax (GST)

in India was initially presented in 2000, when then-Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee formed

a committee to develop a GST model for the country. The discussions and developments related

to GST continued throughout the years, with different governments attempting to refine the

framework. It wasn't until 2006, when then-Finance Minister P. Chidambaram said in his budget

speech that the government planned to adopt GST on April 1, 2010. However, even then due to

political conflicts and practical challenges, the implementation was delayed.

The final push came from the Modi government, which took major steps to address these issues

and pass the legislation. Following which, the Parliament passed the GST Bill in 2016, and the

new tax system went into effect on July 1, 2017. Its purpose was to simplify the tax system by

replacing a myriad of indirect taxes such as service tax, excise duty, and value-added tax . The

introduction of GST has garnered mixed responses. Many are in favor of the system due to the

simplicity it has brought into tax payments. Businesses, particularly those involved in

manufacturing and services, have benefited from GST as it has reduced the burden of multiple

taxes, making compliance easier. The system has also been praised for encouraging foreign

investment, as many global businesses are already familiar with similar tax systems in their

home countries. Further, the implementation of GST has increased the number of taxpayers and

made it more difficult to evade taxes, thus boosting government revenues. This increase in

1
revenue has contributed to national development, with funds being used for various

infrastructure and welfare projects.

A NEW CONCEPT

One of the game changers of GST was the introduction of a new concept named “one nation, one

tax” philosophy, which aimed at unifying the country under a single taxation system, thus

eliminating the complexities of having different taxes across states and sectors. It also ensures

that goods and services are taxed at uniform rates across the country, leading to a more

transparent and streamlined process for both businesses and consumers. However, not everyone

is equally satisfied with the GST system. Some critics point out that GST has increased the

overall tax burden on certain goods and services. For instance, prior to GST, tax rates for many

items were between 8% to 15%, but with GST, the rates now range from 0% to 28%, depending

on the product category. While basic necessities fall under the 0% tax bracket, luxury items are

taxed at 28%, which some argue is too high. The higher tax rates have particularly impacted

industries such as automobiles and electronics, where consumers now have to pay more for

products that were previously taxed at lower rates.

Another point of criticism relates to the implementation of GST at the state level. The system

requires both Central GST (CGST) and State GST (SGST) to be collected on transactions, which

has caused some friction between state governments and the central government. States

previously had the autonomy to set their own tax rates and collect revenues, but with GST, a

significant portion of the tax is now controlled by the central government. This has led to

concerns over the unequal distribution of GST revenues, with some states feeling that they are

not receiving their fair share of the funds collected.

2
The additional accounting and compliance burden that GST has introduced cannot be

overlooked. Businesses, especially small traders and startups, have to file regular returns and

deal with frequent changes in the system, such as filing monthly or quarterly returns and

reconciling their accounts with the GST portal. Non-compliance can result in penalties, late fees,

and interest charges, adding to the challenges faced by smaller entities. While large businesses

with robust accounting systems have been able to adapt, smaller traders often struggle with the

administrative demands of GST, which has been a point of contention. From a broader

perspective, while GST has succeeded in reducing corruption in tax collection by making the

process more transparent and accountable, there are still concerns about its overall impact on the

Indian economy. Some argue that GST has led to increased costs in certain areas, especially for

businesses dealing with goods that fall under higher tax brackets. Additionally, critics point out

that although GST has curbed tax evasion to some extent, other forms of corruption remain

rampant in different government departments, where bribes and delays are still prevalent.

In conclusion, GST has brought a mixed bag of advantages and challenges to India's economic

system. It has undoubtedly simplified the tax structure and promoted transparency, but it has also

introduced new complexities, particularly for smaller businesses and individual consumers. The

long-term effects of GST on India's economy remain to be fully realized, but for now, it stands as

a major reform that has reshaped the way taxes are collected and distributed in the country.

Going forward, addressing some of the shortcomings, such as simplifying compliance for small

businesses and ensuring equitable distribution of tax revenues, will be important in maximizing

the benefits of GST for all stakeholders

You might also like