Kondensator Test
Kondensator Test
Kondensator Test
* Personal favourites!
Sound: The Amp Ohm FP-CA-AU is a very neutral sounding capacitor that takes a nice
smooth and calm approach to the reproduction of music. I found the balance of the
midrange very pleasing letting acoustic instruments keep their natural warm tone.
Absolute detail and air isn't quite up to the level of an Audyn Cap Plus or Mundorf
Supreme but it comes very close although they do need some time to open up so don't
judge them fresh out of the box. Spatiality is broad with reasonable depth but if you
want "bowling alley" depth go for (the much more expensive) Mundorf Silver/Oil.
Compared to the more luxurious Amp Ohm capacitors they are more 2D and a little
rough, but again those cost far more.
Verdict: 8,5
Amp Ohm PF-XAL-AL 300VDC Paper in Oil aluminium foil - 10% tolerance
Sound: The Amp Ohm PF-XAL-AL 300VDC is very rich in harmonic textures and quite
spatious. When fresh out of the box they can be a bit "chesty" or "nasal" sounding but
they mellow out after quite some time of use (several hundred hours). Their tonal
balance is very neutral and smooth, words like natural and analogue come to mind.
Imaging depth is very good but not quite at the same level as their paper-in-wax or
polyester-in-oil stable mates.
Verdict: 10,5
Amp Ohm PF-XAL-AL 630VDC Paper in Oil aluminium foil - 10% tolerance
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "Amp Ohm paper in oil (PIO)
capacitors are hand wound using high aluminum foil. They are oil impregnated before
being assembled and oil filled. The capacitors are then hermetically sealed in an
aluminum housing with phenolic resin and rubber end discs. Each lead is hand solder
sealed to the eyelets in the end discs. The leads are 1.0mm in diameter and made of
tinned copper. All Amp Ohm Audio Capacitors are individually hand tested. Line on label
denotes outer foil."
Sound: The Amp Ohm PF-XAL-AL 630VDC is basically the same type as the above
mentioned capacitor but with a higher voltage rating. The higher rating is obtained using
thicker materials and therefore the 630VDC version (65mm) has a larger diameter than
the 300VDC version (45mm). Both have the same length (95mm). The 630VDC version
reminds me of a can of beer or coke. The higher VDC type is also very rich in harmonic
textures and quite spatious. The tonal balance is very neutral and seems a fraction
smoother than the lower VDC type. Imaging depth is very good but like the 300VDC
version, not quite at the same level as their paper-in-wax or polyester-in-oil stable
mates. My review notes also state: black background.
Verdict: 11-
Amp Ohm PF-XAL-W-AL 630VDC Paper in Wax aluminium foil - 10% tolerance
Sound: The Amp Ohm paper-in-wax alumnium foil type seems a fraction flatter or
condensed sounding when in direct comparison to the Ampohm paper-in-oil alumnium
foil type. It is a little more direct in it's presentation compared to paper-in-oil but more
laid-back when compared to the polyester-in-oil types. I also noted less "fleshy" and a
tad thinner than the Ampohm PIO. There also seems to be a fraction more emphasis on
the frequency extremes giving it a miniscule loudness effect when compared to the very
analogue midrange character of the polyester-in-wax type. This is not meant in a
negative way seeing the overall high quality sound level of this capacitor, as it's
character could prove usefull when fine-tuning a loudspeaker in a certain direction.
Verdict: 10
Amp Ohm FE-XAL-AL 630VDC Polyester in Oil aluminium foil - 10% tolerance
Sound: The Amp Ohm polyester-in-oil alumnium foil is overall very coherent and neutral.
This type has a pleasent midrange-highlight when in direct comparison to the Ampohm
paper-in-wax alumnium foil type. The polyester-in-oil is very rich and extremely good in
retrieving ambient information such as room or hall acoustics. Music is presented in a
natural and full-bodied manner. Compared to the Duelund VSF-Cu copper-foil the image
is more "see through". Compared to the Mundorf Silver-Gold-Oil the presentation is
richer, especially noticable on massed strings or large vocal works. On small jazz-trio's
etc the Silver-Gold-Oil high-lights micro detail a little more but doesn't quite reach the
same level of overall coherence the polyester-in-oil does so well.
Verdict: 11+
Sound: The Ansar CPA has a vibrant, clean and clear nature that seems to be
concentrated more on the top-end of the spectrum. Not completely neutral but therefore
they can be usefull if you want to give a more open sound to a system that sounds a bit
congested in the midrange and / or lower treble, in such a situation the Ansar CPA open's
things up nicely. Used in a tonally neutral system they could do with a bit more presence
and body, they tend to lean towards a slightly thin nature. This nature can make acoustic
instruments like a grand piano or massed strings sound a bit distant. For example a
Jantzen Audio Standard Z-Cap is more neutral and has more body weight but lacks the
top-end "sparkle" the Ansar CPA produces. Nice thing though is that they never get harsh
nor rough around the edges. Image depth is slightly flatter than higher grade capacitors
but compared to other general purpose MKP's they perform very well. Top end detail is
more prominant than the slightly rolled-off nature you find with a Clarity Cap SA. The
Clarity Cap SA in return sounds more up-front in the lower treble range. They are nicely
compact in size, so they can turn out handy when space is critical.
Verdict: 7,5
Verdict: 7
Sound: They sound a bit dull at first because they take a while to burn-in. But after a few
days of normal use they deliver a wide and open sound stage. Nice and neutral, maybe a
slightly warm and lush sound. One of those things that don’t impress at first but sort of
grow on you after a while, you learn to appreciate their qualities - great! If you want a
lively and bright sounding filter then this is not your cap (try a Hovland Musicap instead),
if you are looking for a smooth, warm and relaxed sound then give these a try.
Verdict: 8-
Sound: I find these capacitors to have a pleasently smooth and clear presentation that is
slightly forward if directly compared to bright-ish capacitors like the Jantzen Silver Z-Cap
or Silver Gold Z-Cap. The Auricap retrieve enough amibent information that helps to
make an orchestra properly placed in a concert hall (recording permitting) and project
the image more in the width than in the depth. Overall performance is very satisfactory
and has something correct / complete about it.
Verdict: 9
Sound: I can agree with Audience AV in that the Auricap XO is definitly more transparent
than the standard Auricap. I found the XO to still have a pleasently smooth and clear
presentation but gone is the slightly forward nature. They are more open and have more
fine detail. These characteristics make it easy to follow the leading edge of instruments
and create a greater sense of depth in the recording. Compared to the extremely neutral
Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap there is more clarity, while maintaining a similar level of
neutrality. Although there is lots of detail the XO never becomes edgy or sharp like some
other "detailed" capacitors can sometimes be. Comparing the Auricap XO to the Jantzen
Audio Amber Z-Cap it is obvious what you don't get with the XO: the rich and natural
tone that only true copper foil capacitors can give. But that is an unfair comparsion as
those type of capacitors cost a multitude of the Auricap XO. Overall I found the Auricap
XO to have a nice balance between detail, transparancy and smoothness. I have added it
to my favourites list.
Verdict: 11
Audio Cap PPMF MKP 200VDC - 10% tolerance
Sound: Slightly more detail, depth and separation than a standard Mundorf M-Cap but
slightly less than a Hovland Musicap. The M-Cap has a more round character, the Audio
Cap PPMF a more laid-back character. For the rest I find them reasonably neutral.
Verdict: 7,5
Sound: These caps have a lean, clinical brightness to them and at the same time lack
transparency. A form of artificial clarity is created by means of a treble glare in the top
end - at least they don't have a loudness effect. They work well in opening-up a dull,
lifeless speaker but that's about it. Use them as a small value parallel to a large "dull
sounding" cap only; they will clean up a cheap Intertechnik Audyn Cap nicely.
Verdict: 6,5
Sound: Before I get into talking about how these capacitors sound I would like to say a
few words about the data on these capacitors. First of all I did not make a typo in the
name of these capacitors, they really do have "Audiophiler Mkp kondensotor" printed on
the side. Now I know that the Chinese manufacturer must be trying to look interesting by
writing the name in German, but please, do your homework first. All German nouns start
with a capital and the last word contains a spelling mistake. It should read "Audiophiler
MKP Kondensator". Furthermore, the only information I could find about these capacitors
was from sites such as Ebay, Amazon and AliExpress. "Audiophiler" don't seem to have
their own website (correct me if I am wrong) so lots of misprint or wrong information can
be found. For example some company on AliExpress is selling them as MKP's
(polypropylene) but in their specifications they state that polyester is used as
dialectricum. Some are pictured as "MKP-CYCAP" but sold as "Mkp kondensotor". I found
another company selling them as "Home Amplifier" :-) Also pricing seems to be totally
erratic. Anyway, make sure that you know what you are getting before you buy any. Now
I have got that out of the way, time to explain how they sound. They have a slightly
different character to a standard MKP like the Intertechnik Audyn Cap QS4, just to name
one of many. The "Audiophiler" has an emphasis on the lower treble range making them
a bit upfront or foward sounding. This nature does make them subjecively more dynamic
which can work well in certain systems or with certain types of music such as solo piano
or string quartets. Not completely neutral but they can be usefull in certain situations.
They remind me a bit of the Solen PPE-MKP-FC in their presentation. Play vocals and
they can get a bit shouty sometimes. Compared to a Bennic FPP the "Audiophiler" are
slightly rougher, less smooth. All in all not bad but also nothing special. Like the Solen
they are a good step up from standard MKT capacitors often found in factory built
speakers in being a fraction more spatial and open.
Verdict: 7
Verdict: 6,5
Sound: The Bennic B03 has a slight nasal character and lacks detail. It can be used in
very low cost solutions as long as you take care to voice the system around the B03.
Comparing the B03 to basic MKP's such as the Monacor MKPA or Jantzen Audio Cross Cap
you can here that the extra money spent on an MKP is very much worth it. With such
MKP's you get a gain in transparancy and weight. When complex material is fed to the
B03 they start to get muddy. Personally I would only use the B03 in things like low
frequency correction networks,etc. But I guess that is the only place you would use
bipolar electrolytics anyway.
Verdict: 5+
Sound: The Bennic P03 is similar in character to the B03 although I must say that the
P03 is the more mature sounding of the two. It is better balanced (less nasal) and overall
it sounds smoother. The Bennic P03 has a slight loudness effect to it which can work in
certain systems that are a bit too forward sounding. Actually a bit like the Bennic XPP
although the P03 can get a bit rough around the edges sometimes.
Verdict: 6-
Bennic FPP 400VDC and 630VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Bennic FPP is a reasonably neutral capacitor for basic, allround solutions.
Being neutral it does everything okay in all situations. Okay just about somes it all up
actually. It blends in well into existing loudspeaker crossovers like most standard quality
MKP's do. Compared to a JB Capacitors JSX, the FPP is not as spatial nor as tonally well
balanced, being slightly on the dark side of neutral. Comparing it to a Cornell Dubilier
940C, the 940C gives a more open and dynamic sound that is also more finely detailed.
Just to see how high on the sound quality ladder the Bennic FPP is, I tested it against the
Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap. The Superior was superior (pun intended) in all fields. In
direct comparison the Bennic FPP seemed to lack spatial information and the overall
image was more stuck to the individual loudspeakers rather than floating around them.
But as I said, this is just a reality check, the Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap is more
expensive so you should expect it to do better anyway. Not that price says everything
but over the years the Superior Z-Cap has acted as a solid reference in the mid priced
range of loudspeaker capacitors. It might seem like I am toning down the FPP, on the
contrary, the Bennic FPP is a good quality MKP that will blend into most situations very
easily. Just don't expect miracles from it.
Verdict: 7
Verdict: 6,5
Sound: The Cicada Pure Aluminium Foil capacitor is similar in character to the Mundorf
Supreme in that it has a slight top-end high-lighting except the Cicada lacks the fluidity
and smoothness of the Mundorf. Compared to rich and harmonically natural capacitors
like Jupiter BeesWax and the Obbligato Aluminium type, the Cicada Pure Aluminium Foil
sounds a little rough and technical. After a very long burn-in time they did smooth a lot
but they still maintained a sort of "hifi" sound. They are very accurate and good at
retrieving detail. They put an emphasis on the leading edge of the note and have nice
dynamic snap that can sound exciting on some recordings or types of music. But for me
ultimately they could do with a bit more natural harmonic richness and fluidity to be able
to shine in all situations.
Verdict: 9+
Verdict: 11
Sound: The Clarity Cap range has an overall similarity in tonal balance, going up the
range you gain clarity and spatiality. I found the PW to be quite neutral with a slightly
warmish presentation. Compared to the PX there is a loss of detail but they never sound
dark. Compared to a standard Mundorf M-Cap the stereo-image is a little larger. The
price/quality ratio is very good. I can recommend this capacitor if you have a tight
budget and like a speaker to be as smooth as possible.
Verdict: 7
Sound: To be honest, I can't hear any difference between the Clarity Cap APW and PWA
but that was to be expected, according to Clarity Cap they are the same. I found the
APW also to be neutral with a slightly warmish presentation. Compared to the PX there is
a loss of detail. The price/quality ratio is very good. I can recommend this capacitor if
you are on a tight budget and are looking for a capacitor that doesn't stand-out too
much.
Verdict: 7
Sound: The Clarity Cap range has an overall similarity in tonal balance, going up the
range you gain clarity and spatiality. I found the PX to be neutral with a slightly warmish
presentation. Compared to a standard Mundorf M-Cap the stereo-image is a larger but
less spacious than a Mundorf Supreme or Audyn Cap Plus. Clarity is a good step up from
the PW and also the M-Cap. The price/quality ratio is very good. I can highly recommend
this capacitor if you are looking for a nice, but not too expensive MKP.
Verdict: 7,5
Sound: The Clarity Cap range has an overall similarity in tonal balance, going up the
range you gain a bit in clarity and spatiality. I find the SA to be neutral with a slightly
warmish presentation but also a bit closed-in. Compared to the Clarity Cap PX definition
and separation are better, the stereo-image is also little larger. I did find the top end to
be slightly rolled-off, not that they lacked detailed but on some recordings I wanted a
fraction more transparency - but all in all still very nice. On the downside the "S" and "T"
in vocals can be a bit plasticy, this is probably due to the lack in transparany in the top
octave, making the octaves below sound a little masked. Making a capacitor using about
90% Clarity Cap SA and about 10% Mundorf Supreme works very well, this tends to
open up the top end just nicely without altering anything else.
Verdict: 8
Sound: Similar in overall character to the Clarity Cap SA but with more clarity and
therefore a fraction more spatial. Like the SA they could still do with a bit more
transparency but with a small capacitor placed parallel to the ESA this can be improved.
The ESA also has a slightly warmish presentation and also benefits from making a total
value using about 90% Clarity Cap ESA and about 10% Mundorf Supreme. This opens up
the top end just nicely without altering anything else. Good overall qualities and an
upgrade from the standard Clarity Cap SA.
Verdict: 8,5
Clarity Cap CSA MKP 250VDC and 630VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The tonal character of the Clarity Cap CSA has in common with all Clarity Cap
capacitors that is well balanced and never fatiguing. The CSA shows a pleasent intimacy
combining the clarity (pun intended) of the ESA with the smoothness of the larger MR.
Relatively speaking, I actually found the step up in sound quality from the ESA to the
CSA to be greater than from an MR to a CMR. Both the CSA and CMR use Clarity Cap's
Copper Connect Technology but it seems to have a greater effect on the SA range than of
the MR range. Maybe it's easier to improve lower down the scale than further up it, I
don't know, but that is how it cames across to me. Anyway, in direct comparison to the
CSA the ESA sounds a little rougher, the CSA seems to produce a more civilized image
that is at the same time more neutral. "S" and "T" sounds that were first maybe a little
bit rough around the edges with the ESA (I am being very nit-picky here) become free
from grain with the CSA. I also found the CSA to mix extremely well with the Jantzen
Audio Alumen Z-Cap. A mix of a minimum of 20% Alumen Z-Cap with the rest Clarity
Cap CSA enhanced realism of space and lushness of tone. They blend together
seamlessly. All in all the Clarity Cap CSA is a well balanced, neutral capacitor that is a
welcome addition to capacitors in the lower price range.
Verdict: 9
Clarity Cap MR MKP 630VDC - 3% tolerance
Sound: Like the Clarity Cap DTAC, the Clarity Cap MR doesn't have that dark character of
the standard Clarity Caps and sounds in comparison very spatial and clear. Spatiality is
one of the main strengths of this capacitor supported by very good separation of the
individual instruments and vocals. The music is placed before a very quiet background
with lots of detail making retrieval of ambient information like the natural reverberation
of a concert hall easily distinguishable. Compared to a Mundorf Silver-Gold-Oil they are
ultimately a little less transparent, presenting the information more up-front with a slight
focus on the lower treble range. In comparsion the Mundorf SGO has a slight focus on
the upper treble range.
Verdict: 10,5
Clarity Cap CMR MKP 400VDC and 630VDC - 3% tolerance
Sound: I found the Clarity Cap CMR to have a very neutral and "mature" sound. There is
absolutely no artificial enhancement of any part of the spectrum making this capacitor
extremely well balanced. Compared to a Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap, that I have
grown to know as also being very well balanced, you get a tad more richness of tone with
the Jantzen but I would say that the Clarity Cap is even more close to absolute ruler flat
neutrality. Compared to a Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap, the CMR has a less contrast but
again it is closer to absolute ruler flat neutrality. Down to a matter of implementation
which is best I would say. In a direct A-B comparison with some top of the range Mundorf
capacitors the CMR can sound a little midrange forward but that actually says more about
the character of the Mundorf's rather than that of the CMR. All is relative. The CMR has a
very good leading edge with convincing dynamics and the whole image seems very
coherent. I also did a cross check with the Clarity Cap MR on which the CMR is based to
hear if this "Copper Connect Technology" does anything. The CMR comes across to me as
being more complete and more organic. The MR seems to have a bit more bass and a bit
more air giving it (relatively speaking) a sort of very mild loudness effect. If you had to
choose between the two, I would say that the MR has a bit more "flair" and the CMR is
smoother. I can imagine if a high resolution system has already been tuned using Clarity
Cap MR capacitors, replacing them all with Clarity Cap CMR could possibily make the
system sound a little too neutral and you might find the need to tweak around a bit. But
in the end I would choose the CMR over the MR for it's coherency and good long term
listening qualities. The Clarity Cap CMR is simply spot-on, a no-brainer. I have added it
to my favourites list.
Verdict: 11
Clarity Cap DTAC MKP 630VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Clarity Cap range has an overall similarity in tonal balance except for the
DTAC. It doesn't have the rounded character of the other Clarity Caps and sounds in
comparison much cleaner. I may be exaggerating a little here, but the DTAC makes a
Clarity Cap SA sound a bit cheap. Compared to a Mundorf Silver/Gold they still seem a
fraction rounder and they are as transparent and clear as a Jantzen Audio Silver Z-Cap
without being over bright. If you were looking for lots of depth, ambient information and
concert-hall reverberation then I would advise to look at the Mundorf Silver/Gold, but if
you prefer a slightly smoother top-end then the Clarity Cap DTAC is an interesting
alternative.
Verdict: 10
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "Type 940 round, axial leaded film
capacitors have polypropylene film and dual metallized electrodes for both self healing
properties and high peak current carrying capability. This series features low ESR
characteristics, excellent high frequency and high voltage capabilities; high dV-dt for
snubber applications; capacitance range 0,01 to 4,7µF; capacitance tolerance ±10%;
rated voltage 600 to 3000 VDC (275 to 500 VAC, 60 Hz); operating temperature range
with ripple 55ºC to 105ºC / full rated voltage at 85ºC - derated linearly to 50% rated at
105ºC; insulation resistance more than 100.000 MO x µF; test voltage between terminals
@ 25ºC 160% rated DC voltage for 60s; test voltage between terminals & case @ 25ºC
3kVac @ 50/60 Hz for 60s; life test 2000 h @ 85ºC, 125% rated DC voltage; life
expectancy 60.000 h @ rated VDC 70ºC; case material UL510 polyester tape wrap; resin
material UL94V-0 epoxy fill; terminal material tin plated copper."
Sound: The Cornell Dubilier 940C is a well balanced souding capacitor in which nothing is
exaggerated and that is a good thing. The general timbre seems quite natural, for
example the voice of Marco Horvat on "Il Giardino di Giulio Caccini " is well rendered, has
a certain warmth to it and his voice doesn't "shout". Furthermore the retrieval of ambient
information is done rather well by the 940C making it easier to visualise the size of the
building in which this recording was made. The overall sound of the Cornell Dubilier 940C
is quite pleasing, in some respects it reminds me a bit of the Clarity Cap ESA with its nice
balance between warmth and the amount of detail. There is more space, especially
depth, when in a direct A-B comparison with the Clarity Cap SA, which in return sounds a
tad forward and also veiled. Other things I wrote down during the extensive listening
sessions were: nice ping on ride cymbals, convincing and realistic percussion. I think I
will add the Cornell Dubilier 940C to my favourites list :-)
Verdict: 8,5
Cornell Dubilier 940C / 0,01uF / 3000VDC bypass - 10% tolerance
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "Type 940 round, axial leaded film
capacitors have polypropylene film and dual metallized electrodes for both self healing
properties and high peak current carrying capability. This series features low ESR
characteristics, excellent high frequency and high voltage capabilities; high dV-dt for
snubber applications; capacitance range 0,01 to 4,7µF; capacitance tolerance ±10%;
rated voltage 600 to 3000 VDC (275 to 500 VAC, 60 Hz); operating temperature range
with ripple 55ºC to 105ºC / full rated voltage at 85ºC - derated linearly to 50% rated at
105ºC; insulation resistance more than 100.000 MO x µF; test voltage between terminals
@ 25ºC 160% rated DC voltage for 60s; test voltage between terminals & case @ 25ºC
3kVac @ 50/60 Hz for 60s; life test 2000 h @ 85ºC, 125% rated DC voltage; life
expectancy 60.000 h @ rated VDC 70ºC; case material UL510 polyester tape wrap; resin
material UL94V-0 epoxy fill; terminal material tin plated copper."
Sound: Using the 3000VDC Cornell Dubilier 940C as a bypass capacitor in the value
0,01uF really is the "icing on the cake" when you are looking for a low cost bypass
capacitor that gell's everything into one coherent sound. Best bang for the buck! Over
the years I have used these in many different combinations and everytime they just
added more to the overall sound. More coherency and more ease. Especially when you
have been "cooking" to find your favourite mix of capacitors and only need to cement the
different characters together. Adding the 940C creates an overall more mature sounding
speaker. And no, they are not better than the Duelund or VCap bypass capacitors that
excel's in naturalness and richness of tone and in transparancy and air. The Duelund and
VCap are in another league, not only in sound quality but also in price ;-) Compared to
the Jupiter Copper Foil Paper & Wax used as a bypass, the Jupitor is has richer overtones
and has a tonally slightly warmer balance. The Vishay MKP1837 used to be my favourite
low cost bypass capacitor but now it is the Cornell Dubilier 940C / 0,01uF / 3000VDC. It
surpasses the Vishay with quite some margin :-)
Sound: Things like hall acoustics and richness of tone are two of the Cornell Dubilier SF's
strong points. This richness in tone is nowhere near as good as that of real copper foil
capacitors but far better than that of standard MKP's. Compared to the extremely neutral
Panasonic EZPE the Cornell Dubilier SF sounds more spatious, smooth and open. Tonally
the SF is on the smooth, or even dark side of neutral which makes them ideal if your
system is on the "hot" side of neutral. In such cases the SF Polypropylene in Oil will bring
some welcome warmth to make the system more balanced. The soundstage is portrayed
a little further back than most MKP's, again adding to the "easy listening" character of
the Cornell Dubilier SF Polypropylene in Oil. I also found them to score points for good
decay of notes and realistic room ambience. So all in all maybe not ruler flat neutral, but
still very pleasing to use.
Verdict: 9-
Sound: This industrial type capacitor (like the ASC and Inco) is quite nice! They sound a
bit dull at first because they take a while to burn-in. But after a few days of normal use
they deliver a reasonably wide and open sound stage. Nice and neutral, maybe a slightly
warm sound. One of those things that don’t impress at first but sort of grow on you after
a while, you learn to appreciate their qualities – great! Not the ultimate in sound staging
or micro-detail and if you want a lively and bright sounding filter then this is not your
cap. But if you are looking for a smooth, warm and relaxed sound then give these a try.
Verdict: 7,5
Sound: I found the Duelund VSF-Cu to have a very natural timbre, smooth, clear, open,
and at the same time they stay calm and controlled but delivering dynamics when the
music calls for it. The tonal balance is near perfection, especially audible on well recorded
acoustic instruments and the human voice. This makes my classical music collection so
much more realistic. I was also very pleased with the separation of every individual
instrument in an orchestra, the string section is much more a group of individuals rather
than just a group. In direct comparison to the Duelund I found the Mundorf Silver/Gold to
be a little over-etched sometimes, they seem to have a slight top-end emphasis. The
Duelund VSF-Cu in return has a slight top-end roll-off. Which would be best for you will
depend on the rest of your system and personal taste.
Verdict: 12,5
Sound: After many hours of burn-in time the main thing that I kept writing about in my
notes was how natural the Duelund RS-Cu sounds. This is one of the few capacitors with
which I didn't have the urge to do some fine-tuning or mixing with other types / brands
to reach an optimum result. In all the loudspeaker crossovers I tested them in, they just
sounded so logical everytime. It didn't seem to matter if the tweater had a textile,
magnesium, ceramic or beryllium dome - the Duelund RS just portrayed the sonic
signature of the tweeter as it was. Nothing added, nothing hidden, no need to tweak, a
real no brainer. Comparing the Duelund RS to the old Rike Audio S-Cap I found the RS to
give a richer tonal balance, like most copper versus aluminium caps do. The old Rike
Audio S-Cap seemed more up-front and a little more forward in the lower treble. In direct
comparison the Duelund RS had more depth and was a fraction more forgiving to the
ear. Not that the old S-Cap is rough, not at all, but the RS just seemed to "flow" a little
more. Focussing on the highest frequencies, again the Duelund RS seemed to sound the
most natural. Various high-grade Mundorf capacitors that I compared the RS to all
seemed to high-light that area a bit. This can be usefull or pleasent in some cases, but
for me, they were not strictly neutral. Compared to the Duelund VCF-Cu the top-end has
improved. Although a very nice capacitor, I always found the VSF-Cu to have a slightly
rolled-off top-end. The Duelund RS, like the CAST-Cu, has more top-end clarity and
together with that, more spatiality. Are we then looking at a CAST-Cu in disguise? No,
the CAST-Cu still is the no-compromise capacitor with a blacker back-ground, making it
more silent than the RS. Also the RS-Cu doesn't quite have the same image depth as the
CAST-Cu. But like I stated earlier, the Duelund RS Copper Capacitor is a real no brainer,
once you have put this capacitor in your loudspeaker crossovers you will never need to
tweak again! Everything just sounds so logical.
Verdict: 12,5
Sound: The CAST capacitor has all the same characteristics as the VSF but with added
top-end clarity and together with that, more spatiality. They are (like the VSF) super
natural, smooth, clear and open. The tonal balance is extremely neutral, especially
audible with good recordings of acoustic instruments and the human voice, so mainly
with classical music. This is the closest to absolute, ruler flat neutrality you can get! Like
the VSF the separation of the individual instruments is very good and in an orchestra, the
string section is a group of individuals rather than just a group. Soprano's have clarity
without becoming hard to the ear, wind instruments (especailly the copper section) have
that nice "metal" edge without becoming rough. Where in the past you had to choose
between a Mundorf Silver/Gold/Oil (very good depth, imaging and top-end detail) or a
Duelund VSF (extremely neutral presentation) you can now have the best of both worlds
in the form of the Duelund CAST-Cu. I did find they needed quite a while to fully come to
bloom, so give them a chance to burn-in. The Duelund CAST-Cu is one of the most
neutral sounding capacitors available.
Verdict: 14
Sound: The CAST copper silver hybrid capacitor is very similar to the pure copper version
but with added top end openness. The hybrid is same as the CAST-Cu in regards to
having an extremely neutral tonal balance with very life like harmonics, especially
audible with acoustic instruments but things ssem a little clearer, more "there". For
example, William Lawes' "Consort Sets in Five & Six Parts" (performed by Jordi Savall
with Hesperion XXI) is known for it's rich and structured nature, with the Duelund CAST-
Cu-Ag Hybrid this layered form of music becomes more obvious, more tangible than with
the pure copper version. It seems like the silver content makes the top end "shine" a
little more, making it easier to differentiate between all the rich harmonic overtones this
type of music is well known for. In direct comparison to a Mundorf Supreme EVO Silver
Gold Oil they sound darker but that is only relative because the Mundorf focusses on the
top end with (to my ears) a little too much energy. The Duelund CAST-Cu-Ag Hybrid
simply sounds so much more like real music to me, more intimate as well. The Duelund
copper silver hybrid has a natural ease, is just about tonally perfect, spatious, smooth
and open at the same time. Comparing it with the lower cost Duelunds such as the Rs-
Cu, the RS seems a little "calmer" and less well defined in the top octave. Now, I did find
rating this capacitor to be a little difficult because one could be inclined to say that the
Duelund CAST-Cu-Ag Hybrid must be "at least 2 points better" than the Duelund CAST-
Cu, especially after having such great results with Duelund's seperate 0,01uF pure silver
bypass capacitors. I would be more inclined to say that if you have a system that is
performing extremely well, tonally well balanced, coherent and musical and you want to
get some more "life" out of it, the Duelund CAST-Cu-Ag Hybrid is the only way to go. As
from now I will be supplying the Plutone loudspeaker with this capacitor as an optional
extra. That prooves just how good it is. You won't be dissapointed :-)
Verdict: 14,5
Sound: It is hard to describe what Duelund CAST Cu-Sn tinned copper foil capacitors can
do but they have a certain richness and colour that makes things like voices and acoustic
instruments sound very convincing. With "colour" I don't at all mean "coloured", it is
more like richer and deeper colours with more nuances. I guess "tangible" is a good word
to use to describe them. The sound is intimate and at the same time open. Smooth but
never dark. In direct comparison, the CAST-Cu (not tinned) sounds some what stark. I
have to be careful here because the CAST-Cu is the most neutral sounding capacitor I
know. Saying that the CAST Cu-Sn sounds different could mean that it isn't neutral. But
for some reason it simply does come across as the more realistic of the two. I also tried
bypassing the CAST Cu-Sn with the 0,01uF Pure Silver Foil. Thinking that this would be
turn out extremely good, after all the CAST Cu-Ag is proof that adding a little bit of silver
into the mix can realy make a difference. But I prefer the Cu-Sn on it's own. Adding the
bypass capacitor does increase the amount of detail but the total sound becomes less
coherent (not a good thing), sometimes even a bit "nervous". Comparing the Duelund
CAST Cu-Sn to other capacitors, the Cu-Sn seemed to sound more "mature" than for
example the Jupiter Copper Foil Paper & Wax. This sense of "matureness" was created by
a slightly bigger and more spatious presentation. Swapping the Cu-Sn for the Mundorf
Supreme Classic Silver Gold Oil did give an increase in top end detail but at the same
time the overall sound was less spatious, actually even a bit flat and technical sounding.
Now I am nitpicking here, the Mundorf is an extremely good capacitor, it's just that the
Duelund is even better. I could get carried away here if I let personal taste get in the
way too much. So as a reality check I tried the much lower cost and still very good
Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap, just to see if I should indeed rate the Duelund so high. The
Jantzen Audio capacitor is a 100VDC aluminium foil type, the Duelund CAST Cu-Sn a
100VDC copper foil type: huge difference! With the Duelund CAST Cu-Sn all types of
music flow, become more involving, to such an extent that I was forgetting that I was
testing capacitors - I haven't had that experience for years. For example, listening to
Kendrick Lamar's album Damn, it seemed as if Lamar was even "cooler" than usual
("cool" = "swag" for all you youngsters out there). When direct A-B comparing between
the Duelund CAST CU-Ag and CAST Cu-Sn I would say that with the Cu-Ag the sound is a
fraction more detailed at the very top end where as with the Cu-Sn the overall sound has
a fraction more body to it. So by now you must know that I like my music to be as
neutral and natural as possible and as coherent as possible. The Duelund CAST Cu-Sn
does all these things at an extremely high level - plus it also adds a "being there" effect.
The CAST Cu-Sn tinned copper foil capacitor is something special.
Verdict: 15
From left to right: Duelund CAST Cu copper foil / CAST Cu-Sn tinned copper foil / CAST
Cu-Ag copper and silver foil hybrid. At the rear a pair of Duelund RS-Cu. All the
capacitors have the same value of 3,3uF / 100VDC.
Sound: These 0,01uF tinned copper foil bypass capacitors are really fun to work with.
Like most copper foil bypass capacitors you get that increase in realism of tone, intimacy
and a richness in the harmonic overtones. In direct comparison to the V-Cap CuTF they
sound a fraction more forward but that's more down to personal taste and system
matching, rather than anything to do with sound quality difference. Top of the range
Mundorf capacitors in the value 0,01uF seemed in comparison to add brightness but this
brightness was sort of sitting on top of the recording, not merging into it. The Mundorf's
came across a tad artificial in that respect. Compared to the silver bypass, I find the
tinned copper bypass to be a little darker but all the information contained in the
recording does seem to come across in a more natural way, there is more drive and more
body. Maybe it's they way I listen to music in general so let me explain this in more
depth. My wife and I both come from families where playing a musical instrument is a
normal, everyday thing to do. We continue this with our own family, our main
instruments being the violin and double bass and our children play acoustic drums, piano
and have stared in opera's and theatre productions. All of the instruments are acoustic
instruments, which are very complex things to reproduce via loudspeakers. If I just stick
to my double bass: it is far more than just low notes, the sound of an acoustic upright
bass is a complex mixture of a spruce and maple body resonating, of stainless steel
strings vibrating on an ebony fingerboard, of callus covered fingertips plucking or resin
covered horse tail's hair bowing the strings. With the Duelund Tinned Copper bypass this
complex mix and interaction of timbres comes across in an extremely natural manner, so
it just lets me get deeper into the music. It's closer to real music for me. Where I found
the Duelund Cu-Ag bypass to perform best parallel to a woofer or midrange driver in a
low-pass network, the Duelund Cu-Sn bypass seems to work best when placed parallel to
the series capacitor of a midrange or tweeter high-pass network. Since spring 2020,
when Duelund moved production in house, the Duelund Cu-Sn Tinned Copper Foil Bypass
Capacitor has been significantly reduced in price. With this new lower price it has become
a real no-brainer that should be part of every DIY audio enthousiasts tool box.
Verdict: add about 2 points to whatever capacitor you are connecting it in parallel to.
Sound: I have used these 0,01uF pure silver foil capacitors as bypass capacitors in many
different systems. In just about every case there was an improvement in overall
openness and realism of tone. With realism of tone I mean that acoustic instruments and
vocalists seemed much more tangible, more intimate. The Duelund Silver Bypass
Capacitor brings out a certain harmonic richness in overtones, for example with brass
wind instruments the tone gets a sort of "glow" or "shine" making them so much more
realistic. Big-band music is bright and warm at the same time if you know what I mean,
just like in real-life. And now for a cliché: the Duelund Silver Bypass Capacitor really does
remove a curtain from the sound, creating more depth and insight to the recording and it
generally does a very good job in cleaning things up. It does this without getting harsh
nor adding artificial emphasis on any part of the spectrum, something that can happen
with certain types of bypass caps. Compared to the Duelund Cu-Sn Tinned Copper
bypass the Silver Foil bypass is a little brighter and a tad dryer. This brings me to where
I like to use them the most: parallel to the capacitor in a second or third order low-pass
network of a (mid)woofer crossover. Their clarity and openness makes (for example) an
acoustic drumset sound more realistic. It improves the definition of a bass drum by
providing a clearer image of the beater-head hitting the skin of the drum. Without the
Cu-Ag bypass it just sounds like any bass-drum, with the Cu-Ag connected across the
woofer low-pass capacitor it makes it easier to determine if you are listening to a Pearl,
Yamaha, Ludwig or Gretsch drum kit, if you know what I mean. Quite interesting what
such a small value capacitor can do. Since spring 2020, when Duelund moved production
in house, the Duelund Cu-Ag Pure Silver Foil Bypass Capacitor has been significantly
reduced in price. With this new lower price it has become a real no-brainer that should be
part of every DIY audio enthousiasts tool box.
Verdict: add about 2 points to whatever capacitor you are connecting it in parallel to.
Duelund JDM Tinned Copper Foil Bypass 0,01uF / 600VDC - no tolerance rating
Sound: Initialy I didn't find the difference to be that much between the old tinned copper
bypass capacitor and this new version. I was expecting more after first having tested the
new JDM Silver bypass capacitors. But after a longer burn in things started to improve.
Maybe due to the clearer nature of the silver bypass the difference was more obvious
with those from the start. The JDM tinned copper, being slightly darker in character,
seemd to be more of a "wallflower". Anyway, with burn-in out of the way I found the JDM
tinned copper bypass capacitor to be similar in character to the old model with a rich and
organic character. I would describe the relative difference to the old type in a positive
way as more of the same. So even more rich in harmonic overtones and more organic
than the old model. For example if the treble in your loudspeakers is well rendered and
already neutral in tone, then adding a JDM tinned copper bypass parallel to the main
tweeter capacitor will make the overall sound more convincing. I used to prefer the
Tinned Copper Foil bypass over the Pure Silver Foil bypass on overall performance but
now the relative difference is smaller. It's more music / recording quality / personal taste
/ system dependent. So if you are looking to add richness and realism of tone to your
system, I can highly recommend to use the Duelund JDM Tinned Copper Foil bypass
capacitors.
Verdict: add about 2 points to whatever capacitor you are connecting it in parallel to.
Sound: The JDM Silver's are similar in character to the old model, so clarity and
openness combined with a "glow". Compared to the old model there is an increase in
smoothness. This added smoothness makes them suitable for an even larger range of
applications. I used to prefer the Tinned Copper bypass on overall performance but now I
am leaning more towards the JDM Silver over the JDM Tinned Copper. Their blend of
clarity and smoothness can become addictive, I realy like the JDM Silvers on percussion
instruments, for example stick definition is wel defined with the correct balance between
attack, brightness and warmth. A simliar effect can be found when listening to brass wind
instruments. For example the opening number "Money" on Moonchild's NPR Music Tiny
Desk Concert starts with an intro of alto saxophone, tenor saxophone and flugelhorn. The
three gel together very nicely with the lush wind noise of the instruments being outligned
by a bright and at the same time warm leading edge. Vocals also benefit, becoming more
tangible. So, like the JDM Tinned Copper bypass highly recommended.
Verdict: add about 2 points to whatever capacitor you are connecting it in parallel to.
Sound: The Elcod K78-19 is a neutral, well balanced and coherent sounding capacitor.
The overall sound has body and seems to do quite well with all types of music in many
different systems. Spatial information is above average in this price-range and it's
slightly warm presentation makes it ideal for long listening sessions. Furthermore the
level of detail is just right, not too much nor not too little. Again, overall very well
balanced. Comparing the K78-19 to the K78-34 you do hear that the K78-19 is a little
more forward sounding and less spatious than the K78-34 which in turn is more laid-
back.
Verdict: 7,5
Epcos B32523-Q3475-K26 MKT 250VDC - 10% tolerance
Sound: Suprisingly good sounding polyester type. For tonal balance I actually prefer
them to the Epcos B32656 MKP type. Not quite as coherent as the Vishay MKT1822 but
still pleasent. I can imagine them to work well in woofer impedance correction networks,
where as the Vishay MKT1822 actually works well in the direct signal path.
Verdict: 6
Sound: Sounds kind of "plastic" with a rather 2D, flat image. Midrange is snappy and
there is some pleasent treble bite that brings them just above basic quality
polypropylene types. Fine for parallel sections in woofer and midrange sections of a
loudspeaker crossover, but personally I would not use them in the direct signal path of a
tweeter.
Verdict: 7
Epcos B32774-D1505-K MKP 1300VDC - 10% tolerance
Sound: Similar in looks and sound to the Evox-Rifa PHE 426. Snappy and dynamic but
rather up-front and forward in the midrange. The top-end treble has a slight glaze over it
(not quite as strong as the Evox-Rifa) and therefore lacks a bit of sparkle and
transparancy. Less of a "plastic" taste to it than the Epcos B32656-A6475-J. Fine for
parallel sections in woofer and midrange sections of a loudspeaker crossover, but
personally I would not use them in the direct signal path of a tweeter.
Verdict: 7+
Sound: Compared to the Transient-X from the same brand, the Pulse-X sounds rather
dull and 2D. The treble is produced in a slightly "mushy" manor. This is fine when used in
parallel sections and as a less critical midrange series capacitor but if you are looking for
something in the tweeter's direct signal path, go for the Transient-X that is far more
open, dynamic and has less background noise. Things like massed baroque choir become
a mess, the Erse Pulse-X doesn't seem to keep a clear overview when the programme
material gets complex. But the Transient-X is in another price-range, so not a fiar
comparison. The Pulse-X basically is in the same league as capacitors like the Axon True
Cap, Intertechnik Audyn Cap QS, Jantzen Audio Cross Cap, SCR Chateauroux MKP-PB,
Solen Fast Cap PB-MKP-FC, etc. It's a fine overall standard quality capacitor for use when
your budget is very tight.
Verdict: 6,5
Sound: The Erse Transient-X has lots of "in your face" detail without getting aggresive, it
does a good balancing act in hearing enough detail but not too much. These capacitors
are very usefull if you need to add some clarity to your system. They seem to do well in
improving stick definition on the ride cymbal of a drum-set, like going from a hickory 5A
to a 7A stick size. They also bring out the leading edge of a guitar nicely. The character
of the Erse Transient-X is less well suited for classical music, it lacks some harmonic
coherence at the top end, most noticable on un-processed acoustic music. So summing
things up: they are very good in clearing up a dull system but only if you don't listen to
classical music ;-)
Verdict: 9,5
Sound: Similar to the Evox-Rifa PHE 450, the PHE 426 is transparent and clear sounding
but less grainy. The treble still has a slight glaze over it, but it can be removed by putting
a 0,01uF Vishay MKP1837 parallel to it. Imaging is quite good with a nice sized sound
stage but only average separation. Dynamics are nice and snappy and the treble is well
detailed. Similar in character to the Obbligato aluminium dry type, only it misses the
analogue feeling to it. Compared to a Mundorf RXF it is a little brighter. This capacitor
has a high price/quality ratio and matching it with other capacitors to create a custom
capacitor gives very good results.
Verdict: 7+
Evox-Rifa PHE 450 MKP 250VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Evox-Rifa PHE 450 is a very transparent and clear sounding capacitor, some
times a little too "fresh" sounding but this character can be compensated by adding a
capacitor with a more round character – I had very good results with about 10% of the
total value made up from Angela (Jensen) paper in oil. On its own I find the midrange a
little under exposed and the treble has a slight glaze over it, which again can be removed
by putting a 0,01uF Vishay MKP1837 parallel to it. Imaging is quite good with a nice
sized sound stage but only average separation. Dynamics are nice and snappy and the
treble is well detailed. It might seem that I am not too keen on the PHE 450 but this is
just a way of trying to describe its character in words – I still find it a very nice little
capacitor considering the price. This capacitor has a high price/quality ratio and matching
it with other capacitors to create a custom capacitor gives very good results.
Verdict: 7
Sound: Very compact little capacitor that sounds slightly on the bright side of neutrality.
It is clearer than a Clarity Cap APW or PWA for example and has a reasonably wide image
but lacks depth. So the sound stage is good in left to right positioning but poor in front to
back placement, rather 2D. Its sonic character is quite close to that of the polyester
Vishay MKT1822. The nice compact build designed for use on PC's can be the reason why
one may prefer it above other low priced brands.
Verdict: 6
Sound: The Fostex CS with it's calm, mellow and smooth nature has lots of flow and
texture. It is all about intimacy and richness of tone. Vocals appear more to the front of
the soundstage, that combined with the tone being on the warm side of neutral, give
them that intimate character. Fresh out of the box they can emphasize "S" and "T"
sounds a bit, but they mellow out after about 100 hours of normal use. I found the
Fostex CS to be more lush when compared directly to the Duelund RS, Jantzen Audio
Alumen Z-Cap and Jantzen Audio Amber Z-Cap but at the same time to have a little
more open top-end. This open top end reminded me of the Mundorf Supreme Classic
Silver Gold Oil due to the fact that it outlines vocals nicely, making them easy to follow.
The Mundorf SGO is a little more transparant, more finely detailed and accurate in the
way it does that, the Fostex CS more lower treble forward. The Fostex CS seems to have
overall more character (or colour if you wish) than some other high quality capacitors, so
this can make them a little more critical to implement. If you have speakers that have
lots of detail then upgrading to the Fostex CS will add smoothness and warmth, thus
creating a more neutral presentation. If your system is already pleasently intimate and
mellow, then the Fostex CS could be too much of a good thing if you are striving for ruler
flat neutrality. Even though the Fostex CS is not completely neutral, I still like them a lot
;-).
Verdict: 12
Sound: "Musicaps deliver fine dynamics, speed, focus, correct timbre and depth of field,
and good inter-transient silence" I can't agree more on this! But I must say I have a
love/hate relationship with them: they don't mate with all types of tweeters. If in series
with a very nice soft-dome tweeter they seem to bring out more detail than usual from
such a tweeter compared to when used with other caps. I had good results with Scan
speak soft domes and for the Dynaudio D260 Esotec I couldn't imagine a better cap in
this price range. But if the tweeter tends to be a tad on the bright or clinic side they
sound awful. Of course you do get more detail and a better sound-stage compared to if
you used an Audyn Cap or Le Clanché but for example I tried them with the Focal
tweeter in the Auriga and this didn't work at all! It hurt my ears! Here's a good tip: When
tweaking a combo with a Scan speak D2905-9700 I found the best to be a 50/50%
combination of the Hovland Musicap with a Mundorf Supreme Cap.
Verdict: 8
Sound: Quite detailed without getting edgy or aggressive. High in contrast with a slight
emphasis on the top end but always smooth souding. More lush and warm than, for
example, a Jantzen Audio Silver Z-Cap. On occasions I could hear a slight "loudness"
character in the treble range but nothing to worry about. The overall clean and intimate
character combined with good image depth lets you pick out things in the background
that would otherwise (with standard quality MKP's) get lost in the total mass of musical
information. This character also lets you judge the sound quality of the programme
material very well, they are honest. A quality I rather like.
Verdict: 10
Inco Sintex 45T D2BS MKP 425VAC - 5% tolerance
Sound: This industrial type capacitor (like the ASC)is quite nice! They sound a bit dull at
first because they take a while to burn-in. But after a few days of normal use they deliver
a reasonably wide and open sound stage. Nice and neutral, maybe a slightly warm
sound. One of those things that don't impress at first but sort of grow on you after a
while, you learn to appreciate their qualities – great! Not the ultimate in sound staging or
micro-detail and if you want a lively and bright sounding filter then this is not your cap.
But if you are looking for a smooth, warm and relaxed sound then give these a try.
Verdict: 7,5
Intertechnik Audyn Cap Fine First FFC alu-foil / paper in oil 400VDC - 20% tolerance
Sound: I find the Intertechnik Audyn Fine First Cap to be smooth and calm in it's
approach to music. It will play loud and always stay civilized. The texture of acoustics
instruments is quite natural, big-band's sound lush and rich but sometimes I miss that
nice rough edge and sense of power you get with massed brass going full steam. Large
symphony orchestra's are well spaced out around a realistic and not over-sized sound
field. The FFC is not as spatious, nor does it have as much depth as the higher grade
Mundorf capacitors but what it projects is still very convincing and realistic. The Fine First
Cap scores lots of points for solo piano music giving a very believable presentation of the
instrument in size and texture. Natural timbre with rich, although slightly rolled-off
harmonic overtones. Works well as a series capacitor for compression drivers.
Verdict: 10+
Intertechnik Audyn Cap KP SN 160VDC - 2% tolerance
Sound: The Intertechnik Audyn Cap KP SN has a slightly flat image when compared with
higher grade capacitors but does perform better than basic quality MKP's with a tad more
detail. On loud passages things can a bit compressed, but again that is only when
comparing them with capacitors of many times the price. So basically the Intertechnik
Audyn Cap KP SN seems to fill the sonic gap between standard MKP's and high-grade
types quite nicely. A good step up from it's cheaper brother the Audyn Cap MKP-QS.
Verdict: 8,5
Sound: The Audyn Cap is a good step–up from cheap electrolytic capacitors often found
in standard quality factory built speakers. Nothing wrong with them but also nothing
exciting. Compared with electrolytics they have much more detail, smoothness and a
wider stereo image. Compared to an Audyn Cap Plus they sound dull, mushy and closed-
in. Your basic good old MKP for all simple filter applications, especially when not in the
signal path. A good substitute for bi-polar electrolytics.
Verdict: 6,5
Intertechnik Audyn Cap Plus MKP 800VDC - 2% tolerance
Sound: The Audyn Cap Plus is a nice capacitor! They sound a bit hard and up-front at
first and have a sort of midrange haze because they take quite a while to burn-in. But
after a few weeks of normal use they deliver a spatial sound with lots of depth that only
gets better as time passes. Good reproduction of musical nuances. Clarity, depth, detail
and openness are there. When I first switched over to these I thought "this is it!" (but
that was a few years ago). They do sound a little more mid-range forward compared to
the equally good but more transparant sounding Mundorf Supreme Cap.
Verdict: 9-
Sound: The Audyn Cap Reference is a very nice capacitor! After plenty of burn-in time
they produce very good lower treble articulation. In direct comparison to an Erse
Transient-X of Mundorf Supreme Silver Gold they are not as direct, but personally I like
that. They make a Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap seem a little nervous. The Intertechnik
Audyn Cap Tri-Reference is very coherent, maybe not as "round" as a Clarity Cap MR or
Jupiter Condensers BeesWax, but a little clearer with a blacker background. I find the Tri-
Reference to be spatious and have good seperation of the individual instruments with a
realistic amount of fine detail. They let you hear deep into the recording without ever
exaggerating any part of the spectrum. There seems to be a nice "one-ness" feel about
their overall character.
Verdict: 11+
Sound: The Audyn True Copper Cap is quite spatial with lots of air around the individual
instruments. Very nice and coherent sounding with rich natural harmonics, all in all
rather musical. Woodwind instruments come across with natural ease and brass
instruments sound bright and warm at the same time - very convincing. The Audyn True
Copper Cap has a perfect balance between warmth and detail. The amount of detail and
spatial information lets you hear the acoustics of the recording venue well, placing an
orchestra correctly about the stage (recording quality permitting of course). Very nice
indeed and one of my personal favourites!
Verdict: 12+
Sound: The Audyn True Copper Max is expremely honest, neutral and natural. Like the
Audyn True Copper Cap, the True Copper Max has a very nice and coherent sound with
rich natural harmonics and does so in an even more convincing manner than the already
excellent Copper Cap. Woodwind instruments come across with natural ease and brass
instruments sound bright and warm at the same time. The Audyn True Copper Cap has a
perfect balance between warmth and detail. Vocals are tangible and have space around
them. The amount of detail lets you hear the acoustics of the recording venue well
without ever getting too detailed. For example, in direct A-B comparison to the higher
grade Mundorf capacitors, the Copper Max might seem to focus a tad more on the lower
treble but that is only because the Mundorf's put most of their energy in high-lighting the
top octaves. The Copper Max has a much more rich and full bodied sound than the
Mundorf Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil, maybe not quite as rich as the Jupiter Copper Foil
Paper & Wax, but not far off. Comparing the Intertechnik True Copper Max to various
Duelund capacitors I found the Duelund "signature" in general to be just a tad richer, but
again the Copper Max wasn't far off. Very nice indeed and one of my personal favourites.
They are now used in the Plutone DIY loudspeaker kit as standard!
Verdict: 12,5
Sound: The Intertechnik Audyn Cap True Silver can be a bit "toppy" sometimes, it
depends a bit on the system you use it in and the programme material you feed it. The
Audyn Cap True Silver reminds me of the Jantzen Audio Silver Z-Cap in character
although I do find the Audyn Cap True Silver to be the more neutral of the two. There is
heaps of detail and lots of transparancy, all well in balance with it's other qualities, but it
does need some attention when implementing it as an upgrade in an existing system. If
you will be using this capacitor as the bases for a new crossover-design in which you can
create good synergy with the rest of the system, then you will be rewarded with music
that sounds rich detail, well balanced and never over-etched. It lets you look deep into
recordings like Consort Music by William Lawes for example with all it's complex textural
interaction.
Verdict: 11-
Sound: Like many basic quality MKP's they lack sophistication but their overall tonal
balance is quite neutral. Due to their very low cost they are ideal for parallel capacitors in
the low-pass of a woofer for example where in low budget systems electrolytics are often
found. Also fine in basic quailty parallel correction networks. They are also quite compact
in size, so they can turn out handy when space is critical.
Verdict: 7+
Sound: A step up in clarity from the Jantzen Audio Cross Cap but they lack the
sophistication of the Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap. After extensive burn-in they smooth
out nicely. In a direct A-B comparison they make the Cross Cap sound a little midrange
forward. The Superior Z-Cap paints a bigger and quieter image. The Standard Z-Cap is
good if you are looking for a capacitor that renders well without getting too bright.
Compared to the Mundorf EVO I would say the Standard Z-Cap is a fraction more neutral
but the difference is small. The Standard Z-Cap doesn't have that "mushy" sound the
Audyn Cap QS has and their tonal balance is quite neutral. They do emphasise "S" and
"T" sounds a little, but that is quite normal for all low-cost capacitors. Due to their low
cost they are ideal for budget sensitive systems in the series signal path or for higher
grade parallel capacitors in the low-pass of a woofer for example where in low budget
systems electrolytics are often found. They are compact in size, so they can turn out
handy when space is critical.
Verdict: 8-
Sound: Very neutral and coherent balance, they don't seem to high-light anything and I
mean that in a positive way! They are a little flatter in presentation than their more
expensive brother, the Silver Z-Cap but still better than the Clarity Cap ESA in depth and
spatial information. In direct comparison with a Clarity Cap ESA they are less up-front in
the lower treble and have a better texturing of acoustic instruments like a violin for
example. In the upper treble they are slightly clearer than a Mundorf Supreme
Silver/Gold which probably explains the good spatial information and separation.
Compared to the Jantzen Audio Silver Z-Cap I find them the more musical of the two.
The Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap is a no-brainer if you are looking for a capacitor that
performs well in all area's and is very well balanced. One of my personal allround
favourites :-)
Verdict: 10+
Sound: More transparent than the slightly less expensive Superior Z-Cap, very detailed.
This can make them less coherent than the Superior Z-Cap but this can only be an issue
in systems that are already on the bright side of neutral. They give some emphasis on
the upper treble but are still more civilised than a Clarity Cap ESA for example; they
have a so-called "high-end" flair. Objectively speaking they are better than the Superior
Z-Cap but I prefer the Superior Z-Cap for it is more neutral presentation. I guess you
could call the Jantzen Audio Silver Z-Cap the "audiophile" capacitor and the Jantzen
Audio Superior Z-Cap the "musical" capacitor.
Verdict: 11-
Jantzen Audio Silver Gold Z-Cap 250VDC - 2% tolerance
Sound: Also like the Silver Z-Cap, the Janzten Silver Gold Z-cap is very detailed and
sometimes too detailed for my liking, although I do find them less analytic than the Silver
Z-Cap, they are smoother and therefore more pleasant to listen too. They do well in
upgrading existing crossovers of speakers that are a bit on the laid-back side of neutral,
they will pump some life and energy into such a system. Jantzen Audio themselves state:
"more resolution, more sound stage. Lots of dynamics. Fast reaction, live feeling and
natural sound" I would say the same except for the last bit, live pop-music feeling yes,
live classical music feeling and natural sound, no. But still overall a very nice capacitor.
Verdict: 11-
Sound: Jantzen Audio seem to know what they are doing with this Alumen Z-Cap. They
have created a modern day capacitor that doesn't sound "modern". This might be a
strange way of describing what I mean, but to me it combines the best of both "modern"
and "vintage" worlds. The music flows, has a smooth presentation and at the same time
it is high in contrast. The Alumen Z-Cap has high resolution in a natural way, it is without
glare that you usually get with some of those "high-end" capacitors. There is an adictive
balance between warmth on one side and and openness on the other. Tonally speaking it
is the exact opposite of the Mundorf Supreme EVO Gold Oil that is at a similar high
quality level. The Mundorf MCap Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil is a very clean, detailed
and open sounding with lots of contrast, great depth and heaps of micro detail. The
Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap is also open and also has lots of contrast but does it with a
warmish undertone. Where as the Mundorf can get a bit on the lean side of neutral in
some situations, the Jantzen maintains coherency under all conditions. The combination
of and balance between these characters is spot on and make the Jantzen Audio Alumen
Z-Caps create music with a great sense of realism. Comparing the Alumen Z-Cap to
other aluminium foil capacitors like the Jupiter HT BeesWax Paper you understand what I
mean with a modern day capacitor that doesn't sound "modern". The Jupiter HT Beeswax
has a similar clear and open presentation but also slightly rounder and softer, more
"vintage" if you like. In direct comparison the Alumen Z-Cap is more neutral (as you
might of guessed by now, I like my music to sound neutral). Compared to the extremely
neutral Duelund RS copper foil, the Duelund gives you richer harmonic overtones but
with slighlty less sparkle at the top. In the end the Duelund does show you what real
absolute neutrality is - although to obtain that you need to spend a lot more money.
Taking that into consideration, the Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap is an absolute bargain! I
also found the Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap to mix extremely well with the Clarity Cap
CSA and CMR. Both types blend together seamlessly with the Alumen Z-Cap. Overall the
combo with the CMR is more lush and spatious with a wide and deep image. It paints a
bigger image. The combo with the CSA projects the image more forward and sounds a
little brighter. Although the slightly brighter presentation with the CSA can be welcome in
some cases / recordings, over extended periods of time I prefered the smoother sound of
the Clarity Cap CMR with the Alumen Z-Cap. The Alumen is a very nice capacitor with a
nice balance between clarity, timbre and texture. Very good price / performance ratio.
Objectively speaking the Amber are better, but they just cost a lot more to get you from
11,5 points to 12,5 points ;-) I have added the Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap to my
favourites list.
Verdict: 11,5
Sound: In general (like all copper foil types) the Jantzen Audio Amber Z-Cap has a nice
realism of tone, very convincing in the way it portrays vocals and acoustic instruments.
The Amber Z-Cap is extremely neutral, nothing stands out (in a positive way) so I would
group it with other very neutral copper foils like the Duelund RS and Audyn True Copper
Max. Not quite as dynamic as the Rike Audio S-Cap nor as rich and lush as the Jupiter
copper foils and Duelund CAST Cu-Sn, just simply middle of the road neutral which I find
to be very pleasing when listening to a wide range of music types and recording qualities.
Basically copper foil capacitors can be split into two camps, one that is absolutely neutral,
the other that has a slightly more "character" to the tone. I would consider the Audyn
Cap True Copper Max, Duelund RS, Jantzen Audio Amber Z-Cap and Miflex KPCU-01 to
be very neutral. All Jupiter types, Duelund CAST series, Rike Audio Q-Cap have a bit
more character or colour. It's up to you which suits your system and taste the best! I
have added the Jantzen Audio Amber Z-Cap to my favourites list.
Verdict: 12,5
Sound: First of all I must mention that JB Capacitors were very kind to send me a large
selection of different values and voltage ratings of their JFX capacitors. This made it
easier to test the capacitors in a large range of different loudspeakers and I could also
check the tolerance ratings. All the capacitors that I received measured well within the
5% tolerance rating. How do they perform? Well, after plenty of burn-in time (that they
need to open-up) they deliver a wide and open sound stage. Nice and neutral, but the
signature can be a bit upfront and flat. In some cases the "flat" sound can work well, for
example if you just want to keep things tame or if you are replacing some old
electrolytics or MKT's and don't want to shift the tonal balance too much. One of those
things that doesn't impress at first but sort of grows on you after a while. They are also
fine when used in parallel woofer sections or as a less critical midrange series capacitor.
But if you are looking for something in the tweeter's direct signal path I would advise to
look elsewhere - in a similar range their JSX types for example are more open and clear,
especially the higher voltage types. During testing, the JB Capacitors JFX actually
reminded me quite a lot of the Erse Pulse-X that I tested a couple of years ago, so I got
the Erse out again and plugged them into the same test loop. They seem so similar that,
to be honest, I couldn't tell if I was listening to a JB Capacitors JFX or an Erse Pulse-X!
With the JFX things like massed baroque choir become muddled, they don't seem to keep
a clear overview when the programme material gets complex. Also brass missed that
shine that is so typical for such wind instruments. I guess I would add the JB Capacitors
JFX to the list of capacitors like the Axon True Cap, Intertechnik Audyn Cap QS, Erse
Pulse-X, etc. The price / quality ratio is very good. I can highly recommend this capacitor
if you are looking for a nice, but not too expensive MKP.
Verdict: 6,5
Sound: Sound: The JB Capacitors JFX Premium sounds quite organised when compared
with other standard MKP's in this price range. Like all basic MKP's thay can get a bit
muddled when complex progamme material is fed to them but they do have a certain
tidyness to them which makes them go further before that sets in. The JFX Premium is
reasonably well balanced and neutral and in a positive way nothing sticks out. If you are
looking for a basic MKP at a very fair price then the JB Capacitors JFX Premium is a good
contender.
Verdict: 7
JB Capacitors JLX 100VDC - 3% tolerance
Sound: The physical size and shape of the JB Capacitors JLX is very similar to that of the
Jantzen Audio Alumen Z-Cap 100VDC and Cicada Pure Aluminium Foil 100VDC. The JLX
has a clear top end, more detailed than that of the Alumen Z-Cap but therefore less
smooth. The Alumen's smoother nature makes it sound more intimate in a direct A-B
comparison. Furthemore the Alumen had better depth, imaging and a slightly richer tone.
Compared to the Cicada Pure Aluminium Foil the JLX Aluminum Foil and Metallized
Polypropylene is far more open and clear, it just sounds less closed-in. If we go to a
different breed of capacitors from the Mundorf stables the Supreme Classic sounds less
mature than the JLX although it does have a similar amount of clarity in the top end.
Vocal with the JLX have more richness making the Supreme Classic sound a little
forward, a little more in your face. From Mundorf's EVO range, the Supreme EVO Oil also
lacks a little overview compared to the JLX. But if we go up the Mundorf scale to the
Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil we get far better reverberation information and heaps more
low level detail. This makes the Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil keep the overview in
complex orchestral music where the JLX tends to get muddled up. In direct comparison
the JLX sounds rather bland. So all in all I found the JLX to be the best capacitor so far
from JB Capaitors that I have tried. Maybe not quite at the same level as the higher
grade Mundorfs or Jantzen Audio's aluminium foil Alumen Z-Cap but still a reasonably
neutral and very usable capacitor.
Verdict: 11
JB Capacitors JSX 250VDC and 630VDC - 5% tolerance (old model)
Sound: First of all I must mention that JB Capacitors were very kind to send me a large
selection of different values and voltage ratings of their JSX capacitors. This made it
easier to test the capacitors in a large range of different loudspeakers and I could also
check the tolerance ratings. All the capacitors that I received measured well within the
rated 5% tolerance. Soundwise you can hear that the JSX comes from the same family
as the JFX but I prefer the JSX to the JFX because they are clearer (especially the higher
voltage types) which makes them less muddled and therefore easier to follow the musical
content. When compared to one of my favourite low-cost capacitors, the Mundorf EVO
Oil, it is evident that the JB Capacitors JSX still lacks some clarity and sound a bit
forward. The Mundorf EVO Oil emphasizes the top-end a fraction anyway, so maybe that
comparison is not completely fair. But on the otherhand it does explain on which side of
neutral both capacitors stand regarding the amount of top end clarity. What the EVO Oil
does do much better is reproducing spatial information, the image lacks some depth with
the JSX but not as much as with the JFX. Comparing the JB Capacitors with other low
cost types I would say that it comes closest to the Jantzen Audio Cross Cap or Jantzen
Audio Standard Z-Cap. Comparing them to the Obbligato aluminium-foil MKP there are
similarities in that they are both a little upfront sounding when compared to higher grade
types, but at least the Obbligato aluminium-foil MKP shows a more open tonal balance.
Like many of these basic quality MKP's JB Capacitors JSX lacks some sophistication but
their overall tonal balance is reasonably neutral. The price / quality ratio is very good. I
can highly recommend this capacitor if you are looking for a nice, but not too expensive
MKP. Good overall qualities and an upgrade from the standard JFX.
Verdict: 7,5
Verdict: 7+
Sound: I found the Jupiter HT BeesWax Paper to be very spatious and rich in harmonic
texture. They are clear and open but there is never and over-emphasis on any area.
Compared to AmpOhm aluminium foil types the Jupiter has more air and they produce a
wider image where as the AmpOhm project more front to back. Still not quite as neutral
and coherent sounding as the Duelund VSF but at the same high quality level as the top
of the range Mundorf's. They have a nice fleshy treble with a rich midrange to match.
They act well under all conditions and don't seem to have any preferences. I find them
very pleasing to listen to.
Verdict: 11,5
Jupiter Condenser Flat Stacked Beeswax Cryo Capacitors 100VDC / 300VDC / 400VDC -
5% tolerance
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "Jupiter Condenser have applied
the same materials and processes used to make their HT line of capacitors to make there
all new Flat Stack capacitors, the VT range is rated at 100V and has been specifically
designed for loudpeaker crossover use. They feature a reinforced beeswax paper
dielectric cased in a non-drip/melt casing and can withstand higher operating
temperatures. Available values are 1uF to 15uF. For higher voltage application there is
the Flat Stack HT range. For production, a computer controlled wax vacuum impregnation
system was engineered and built by Jupiter Condenser and section processing is based
on techniques developed by Western Electric and RCA. This is capable of deep vacuum
and high pressure, providing consistent impregnation with more gas and moisture
removal. New proprietary measures of strengthening dielectric properties have been
developed and employed which yield higher insulation resistance and allow greater
operating temperatures. Wax and paper construction yields a very well mechanically
damped capacitor, free from electrostatic and mechanical ringing. Tolerance ±5%
standard; Rated voltage 100VDC (VT type) 300VDC and 400VDC (HT types); Pure silver
leadouts 1mm diameter; Max temperature +70°C; Beeswax impregnated paper
dielectric; Aluminum Foil electrode material; Cryogenically treated."
Sound: The Jupiter Flat Stacked capacitors are similar in sound to the HT BeesWax Paper
types in that they are very spatious and have a nice fleshy treble and a rich harmonic
texture. Compared to the HT BeesWax Paper types the Flat Stacked capacitors are
actually even meatier and more intimate, in a direct A-B comparsion the HT BeesWax
sounds a tad more forward. The Flat Stacked are warmer and richer in texture than the
Rike Audio S-Cap but also a little more laid-back in presentation, slightly romantic
sounding if you like but never to the point where you could call them "slow" - on the
contrary. The Rike Audio S-Cap seems a little more dynamic and open but also more "in
your face" than the Jupiter's. When comparing the Flat Stacked to a Jantzen Audio
Superior Z-Cap you get a more rich and colourfull image with the Flat Stacked, especially
noticable when listening to things like a solo piano where the harmonic overtones have
more layers to the texture making things more convincing. I found the Jupiter's to take
all types of music with no particular preference for one type over another, which is a
good thing in my opinion. Also, the higher voltage types seemed to sound a tad more
spatious, not much, but noticable in a direct AB comparison. Overall very nice indeed!
Another plus point: their tolerances are relatively small for paper based capacitors, you
usually see higher tolerances with this type of capacitor.
Verdict: 12
Sound: The Jupiter Copper-Foil Paper & Wax seems to have everything you are looking
for in a capacitor: a coherent and organic presentation, detail and smoothness come
hand-in-hand, a well controlled and focussed image, rich and transparant overtones, they
are all there. The image is produced against a quiet background making it sound spatious
with good retrieval of the recording venue. For example on Jordi Savall's mulit-channel
recording of "Esprit d'Armenie", when you close your eyes it is as if you are sitting there
in the old church building with the musician's only a few metres away. The texture and
timbre of acoustic instruments seems very realistic. Comparing the Jupiter with other
high quality capacitors, you get similar amounts of fine detail as you do with the Mundorf
Supreme Silver Gold Oil but with more weight and coherence. The top end clarity of the
Jupiter also has certain richness to it. It's organic texture and smoothness is very similar
to that of the Duelund RS but with a tad more "shine" in the top octave. I guess if you
want to be as close to absolute, ruler flat neutrality as possible then the Duelund RS
would be your favourite. If you are looking for a tad more air at the top, then the Jupiter
Copper-Foil Paper & Wax is a serious alternative. A matter of personal taste I would say.
Switching to a different copper-foil capacitor, the Rike Audio Q-Cap, you get more body
especially noticable with solo piano. But the Q-Cap doesn't have that same lush and
intimate character that makes the Jupiter so convincing and lovable. Comparing the
Jupiter with the Duelund CAST-Cu, I found there was a tad more blacker background and
a little more "being there" effect with the CAST-Cu but the Jupiter did seem more airy
than the Duelund. Anyway, the Jupiter Copper Foil Paper & Wax is one of my favourite
capacitors!
Verdict: 13,5
Jupiter Condenser Copper Foil Paper & Wax / 0,01uF / 600VDC bypass - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Jupiter Copper-Foil Paper & Wax used as a bypass capacitor in loudspeaker
crossovers creates a nice balance between warmth and detail creating a very pleasent
overall sound. I found myself plugging them in and leaving them there, easy to listen to.
Comparing the Jupiter with the Duelund bypass types, I found there was a more black
background and a more "being there" effect with the Duelunds but the Jupiter only costs
about half, so very well done Jupiter! Compared to the low cost Cornell Dubilier 940C /
0,01uF / 3000VDC the Jupiter sounds more mature with more natural harmonic
overtones.
Verdict: A very affordable ticket to the world of high quality copper foil bypass
capacitors!
KZK K78-34 250VAC / 375VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The KZK K78-34 is a full bodied, slightly warmish sounding capacitor with a very
smooth top end. The tonal balance gives slightly more attention to the lower part of the
treble making it not as finely detailed as Mundorf capacitors for example but which does
give it a nice intimate character that is very pleasing on long term listening sessions. The
smooth top end gives a calm and natural presentation that is slightly on the dark side of
neutral. As a reality check I compared the K78-34 with the absolutely ruler flat (and far
more expensive) Duelund RS-Cu. The Duelund sounded in a direct A-B comparison more
open in the top end and overall more balanced. Switching to the other end of the scale,
comparing the K78-34 with standard quality MKP's such as the Intertechnik Audyn Q4 or
Solen Fast Cap PB-MKP-FC, you notice how nicely full-bodied and rich the presentation of
the K78-34 is. It can get a little bit muddy on complex orchestral works or massed choir
music but I guess that is due to it being slightly on the dark side of neutral. The
soundstage is placed slightly in front of the speakers, again making the overall sound
quite intimate. In contrast to various Mundorf capacitors that tend to place the
soundstage a little more to the back. That the K78-34 doesn't have heaps of outlined
detail at the top end can be quite usefull at times, for example, if your system is a bit on
the hot side of neutral the K78-34 should bring everything nicely back into balance.
Verdict: 8,5
LCR Capacitors FSC tubular foil polystyrene 0,01uF 160Vdc - 2,5% tolerance
Sound: Like the Vishay MKP1837 they really clear things up when used as a small parallel
capacitor. They take away the grainy edge from most capacitors. They give a gain in
clarity and detail making instruments better separable from each other, the violins in an
orchestra are a group of individual violins instead of one mass. They don't do the
disappearing-act quite as well as the Vishay MKP1837 but they come close. I also find
them to match well with "analogue" sounding capacitors like paper-in-oil types, etc in
which they improve clarity at the top end of the spectrum.
Verdict: An alternative to the Vishay MKP1837 if you are looking for a detailed sounding
bypass capacitor. They should be implemented with care, using them through out your
loudspeaker crossovers could tip the tonal balance a little towards the bright side.
Sound: Similar in character to the Mundorf M-CAP but with more detail right down into
the midrange. Pleasant open sounding and smooth. Less depth than the ASC MKP in oil. I
quite like these!
Verdict: 7,5
Sound: The Lefson C-MON SPK brings flow to the music with a clear, neutral and tangible
midrange without any rough edegs. This clear and smooth timbre is similar to what you
get with silver foil capacitors, it wouldn't surprise me if inside the potted enclosure there
is a small silver foil bypass capacitor added into the mix. But that is just speculation.
Although it doesn't have the nice, rich organic qualities of a copper foil capacitor the C-
MOD SPK does gain points for its addictive "see through" nature. Compared to a Jantzen
Audio Alumen Z-Cap the Jantzen has more contrast but the Lefson presents the image in
a more mature way, also slightly bigger. The amount of clarity that the Lefson produces
is similar to that of the Mundorf Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil but without the edge,
therefore being more pleasent to the ear. Solo piano music is well defined and above
middle C realistically dynamic. The Mundorf has a bit more emphasis on the very top end
making it do things like brass instruments sound nice and shiny. The Lefson C-MOD SPK
doesn't high-light anything and is (in direct A-B comparison) a tad more forward
sounding in the lower treble making it smoother and therefore better suited for long term
listening sessions. Long term listening is something that the Jupiter BeesWax HT is well
suited for, comparing the Lefson with that capacitor shows that the BeesWax HT is more
intimate and warmer than the C-MOD SPK. In a direct A-B comparison the Lefson sounds
a bit flatter and less liquid than the Jupiter, on the other hand the Lefson has this "see
through" nature that I mentioned earlier. But everything is relative, the BeesWax HT
might be more intimate than the Lefson in certain situations but in turn I found the
Lefson to be more intimate than a Mundorf Supreme Silver Gold Oil. Especially noticable
with vocals. For example Diana Krall singing "Day in, Day out" on her album "From this
moment on" was more in my listening room with the Lefson. My listening notes also
stated good seperation of individual choir members and the acoustics and reverberation
of the concert hall can be easily distinguished. Very good on big-band music and large
symphony orchestra's. Smooth, neutral and detailed at the same time, I quite like these!
Verdict: 12,5
Miflex MKP-10 600VDC - 2% tolerance
Sound: Neutral and coherent but slightly midrange forward which can make them sound
subjectively louder than more "laid back" capacitors. In that respect they remind me a
little of the Intertechnik Audyn Cap Plus, although overall I do rate the Audyn Cap Plus
higher. For fun I also compared the Miflex MKP-10 to the Wima MKP-10 seeing that they
both have the same type number: the Miflex sounded a little congested in direct
comparison to the Wima. Comparing then with all the Clarity Caps I would say that they
are just about on the same level as the Clarity Cap PX or SA but without the hint of
warmth you get from Clarity Cap. If that is a good thing or a bad thing is up to you to
decide, personally I preferred the Clarity Cap's. And to put things into perspective: the
Clarity Cap CSA was more intimate and had a tad more top end detail and the higher
range Clarity Cap CMR was much more spatious. Comparing the Miflex MKP-10 to the
Intertechnik Audyn Cap MKP-QS turned out in favour of the Miflex for sounding a little
fuller, although there was still that hint of midrange forwardness with the Miflex. I guess
this forwardness is also partly to do with a slightly rolled off top end of the MKP-10. This
can make lesser quality recordings sound a bit in your face at times. But if the character
of the Miflex MKP-10 is taken into consideration when voicing your loudspeakers, they
can be a nice alternative.
Verdict: 8-
Miflex KPCU-01 600VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Miflex KPCU-01 brings texture to music in a nice organic manner. At times
the presentation can be quite tangible. For example on Garry Willis' album Retro it
sounds like he has just re-strung his five-string bass. The harmonic overtones of the
instrument become more evident making the bass-lines easier to follow. This is not done
by artificial emphasis on the top end, it is more "just right". Long term listening sessions
are very pleasent which shows that there is nothing artificial about the sound at all - on
the contrary. The sound sort of grows on you after a while. Comparing the KPCU-01 to
other foil capacitors I found it to be more forward sounding than the both the Duelund
CAST Cu and the CAST Cu-Sn and the Jupiter Copper Foil Paper & Wax. In direct
comparison the KPCU-01 is a little less transparant in the top end but still rich in tone,
smooth and coherent. Although with the Jupiter Copper Foil Paper & Wax music did seem
to sound more "complete". A-B switching between the Miflex KPCU-01 and the Duelund
RS-Cu revealed that the RS-Cu is more ruler flat neutral of the two but the KPCU-01 did
very convincing harmonic overtones. On the other hand, comparing it to the Jantzen
Audio Alumen Z-Cap you get a richer tone with more flow and air with the Miflex.
Another example: the Mundorf Supreme Classic Silver Gold Oil sounds in direct A-B
comparison to have less body and a less natural tonal palette than the Miflex. A very nice
capacitor, the KPCU-01.
Verdict: 13+
Monacor MKPA 250VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Monacor MKPA reminds me a bit of the Solen Silver Sound but less
sophisticated. Compared to the Solen PPE-MKP-FC I actually prefer the Monacor for being
a little smoother, with the Solen PPE-MKP-FC piano can sometimes sound a bit hard. The
Monacor doesn't have this "problem". So all in all I can say that the Monacor is a good,
general purpose capacitor.
Verdict: 7+
Sound: The Mundorf MCap 250VDC has exactly the same tonal balance as the 400VDC
type I originally tested. The only difference being a very small lack of fine detail and
image size compared to the higher VDC rating MCap's.
Verdict: 7-
Mundorf MCap MKP 400VDC - 3% tolerance
Sound: I find the Mundorf MCap a little better than the Intertechnik MKP QS. Nothing
extreme, but noticeable, especially if all capacitors in your filter are MCap's. A little more
lively and with better speration than the Audyn Cap MKP-QS with slightly more midrange
openness.
Verdict: 7
Sound: The Mundorf MCap is available in three different VDC ratings (250/400/630VDC).
What seems to happen whith an increase in VDC rating, is the more you get regarding
terms as seperation of the individual instruments (massed violins for example), the
deeper the image size and there is also an increase in the amount of fine detail. The
differences are very small and there is absolutely no change in tonal balance, they all
have the same character. On some types of music I couldn't hear any differences at all
but with high quality recordings on a high quality system the relative differences could be
heard - nothing shocking, but noticable most of the time. Also these relative differences
could only be distiguished when A-B switching between the three, I mean sometimes I
was listening to (what turned out to be) a 250VDC type and said "this sounds great"
(thinking this must be the 630VDC MCap), then when switched to another VDC rating I
sensed a very slight improvement. So one could be perfectly happy with the lower VDC
capacitors but if one has the possibility to choose, go for the MCap 630VDC types.
Verdict: 7+
Sound: I found the Mundorf MCap ZN Classic to produce a clean an accurate midrange
combined with a detailed top end. The overall precise and pleasent nature is clear but
never edgy. In direct comparison to the also precise sounding Mundorf EVO Silver Gold
Oil (that costs roughly twice the price) the ZN Classic comes across slightly less civilized
but I did find vocals to be more realistic than the EVO Silver Gold, they had a little more
body with the ZN Classic. Comparing the tin foil ZN Classic with the copper foil Fostex CS
you notice that with copper foil you get more body and more weight. But again, copper
foil capacitors are far more expensive so this is just to find where the ZN Classic sits in
the range. The ZN Classic is less "toppy" than the standard EVO Oil which gives it a bit
more body. Compared to capacitors that are more midrange quality focussed (like the
Duelund RS) the Mundorf ZN Classic would appear to have a mild loudness character. But
again, all is relative. All in all the Mundof ZN Classic gains points for it's nice balance
between clarity, openness wihtout getting rough around the edges.
Verdict: 9
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "With the MCap RXF (Radial Xtra
Flat), Mundorf presents an entirely new, innovative type of capacitor. The benefits of the
special winding geometry, starting with the extremely compact shape, easily appeal to
both the professional audio developer as well as the ambitious hi-fi amateur. The large
winding diameter with its internal contact surface, designed to be as large as possible,
and the exceptionally large design of the connection endplates guarantee the shortest
signal paths with little loss. This in turn results in an extremely low rest resistance and
very low equivalent series inductivity. The polypropylene foil used was dampened with a
metal layer of maximum thickness. The additional grouting of the winding in the casing
provides the capacitor with sustained protection from microphonic effects and
furthermore prevents the winding from vibrating. This all has the objective of achieving
the lowest loss of energy and distortion in tone. The MCap RXF will convince you of its
appeal on the first go with a strikingly natural, tonal liveliness and the transparent
nuanced dynamic of the music sound with which it once more sets the appropriate
musical benchmark for all capacitors which, in their case, must forego the expensive
Supreme winding technology for reasons of cost."
Sound: Compared to the standard MCap they are cleaner and more transparent. The
MCap's are slightly more midrange focussed. The RXF are nicely detailed without being
edgy but could be a little smoother sometimes, they tend to draw your attention to the
top-end more than the rest. This top-end focus does gather points regarding the retrieval
of ambient information and reverberation. But I find the lower treble lacks some
refinement, a bit "in your face". They do get better over time but a slight glare stays. The
Supreme is similar in spatial information but far more refined and therefore better. I also
find the Clarity Cap PX to be smoother, rounder and therefore scores better in long term
listening. This is most evident on well-recorded classical music. Overall I am still very
positive about the RXF (especially considering the price) and see them as a welcome
arrival for the budget sensitive user. They could also be a handy upgrade for existing
crossovers were space is limited because they are built more compact than regular axial
capacitors, especially when you need large values.
Verdict: 8
Sound: The compactly built Mundorf MCap EVO Aluminium is basically overall pleasent to
listen to and has the well kwown Mundorf sound signature. Reasonably neutral with a
slight emphasis towards higher frequencies making it sound a little more transparant
than some darker, more rounded-off types. Compared to the higher grade Mundorf EVO
capacitors is can sound a bit flat at times, lacking some depth in the image but don't lean
too heavy on this - the EVO Aluminium as a low priced capacitor so don't expect
miracles. In direct comparison to a Vishay MKP1839HQ they are more open, in direct
comparison to the more expensive, but also very affordable Intertechnik Audyn Cap Plus
the EVO Aluminium offers more transparancy but at the same time less coherency. The
Audyn Cap Plus has a more balanced and tonally even presentation.
Verdict: 7,5
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "The MCap EVO Oil combines the
MCap EVO's sound characteristic in a perfect way with the acoustical advantages of oil
impregnated capacitors. Furthermore, its additional wrapping as well as its imprint in
red-metallic impart an appropriate quality look and haptic."
Sound: The compactly built Mundorf MCap EVO Oil is a big step up from the basic MCap
EVO Aluminium and actually it is my personal favourite of the three EVO type's although
it's more expensive brother, the EVO Silver Gold Oil, does still excel in fine, airy top-end
detail. I found the MCap Evo Oil to do especially well on vocals, male and female voices
come out well rendered and relatively natural sounding with a certain richness. Wind
instruments (brass or wood) also sound convincing with the EVO Oil, they seem to have a
natural edge to them. Image depth is another strong feature of the EVO Oil although not
up to the high level of Mundorf's Supreme range. All in all the MCap EVO Oil seems to be
the best overall performer of the EVO range unless you are into piano music - then the
MCap EVO Silver Gold Oil scores lots of points for top-register clarity. Brighter than an
Intertechnik Audyn Cap Plus that costs roughly the same but at the same time not as full
sounding. I found that the EVO Oil likes to be mixed with Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Caps,
the slightly bright nature of the EVO Oil blends well with the very neutral and spatious
sounding Superior Z-Cap. For example when used for a large value midrange series
capacitor: mixed at about one third Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap and two thirds Mundorf
MCap EVO Oil, together they form a well-balanced rich and spatious combo at a
reasonable price.
Verdict: 8,5
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "The all-new MCap EVO Silver Gold
Oil unites the audible features of the MCap EVO Oil with those of a Silver Gold
metallization to a breathtakingly beautiful music performance. The beauty of the MCap
EVO Silver Gold Oil's music performance is only surpassed by Mundorf's top-line Supreme
capacitors"
Sound: The Mundorf MCap EVO Silver Gold Oil really stands out when it comes to
instrumental classical music. Especially if you have a fetish for grand piano's you will like
the MCap EVO Silver Gold Oil! The rich clarity in the range from C5 upwards is addictive,
making a Yamaha Concert Grand sound very articulate and realistically bright. The
overall sound is clean and airy with actually more fine detail than the Mundorf Supreme
but the Supreme win's when things get complicated and loud by keeping the overview.
Due to the clear nature of the EVO Silver Gold Oil sibilance is a little more pronounced
than with the MCap Supreme that comes across more civilized and coherent. The MCap
EVO Silver Gold Oil does need some time to burn-in and calm down. Fresh out of the box
I found them rather nervous, give them at least 50 hours to mellow out. One major plus
point about the MCap EVO Silver Gold Oil is it's very compact build, compared to the
MCap Supreme it is only a third to a quarter of the size (depending on the capacitance
value) which makes it handy if you are looking for a high quality capacitor and the
available space is rather limited. The EVO Silver Gold Oil can be slightly on the "toppy"
side of neutral at times, so it does mix well with capacitors that sound a little mid-range
forward, like the Intertechnik Audyn Cap Plus for example.
Verdict: 9,5
Sound: The Mundorf MCap Supreme EVO Oil has a slightly calmer presentation than the
Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil. Also, in direct comparison there is less micro detail, a less
black background and less contrast. But what do you expect at about a quarter of the
price! Going down the scale and comparing them to the Supreme Classic Silver Oil I
found the EVO to be a little clearer and more transparant, the Classic was a little
smoother and had more rich harmonic overtones. For example large crash and ride
cymbals had more "shine" with the Supreme EVO Oil but a more realistic and convincing
"metallic warmth" with the Supreme Classic Silver Oil. But again, what do you expect
with the classic being about three times the price! Next comparison was with the
standard MCap Supreme Classic that is a fraction cheaper the the Supreme EVO Oil. Here
the EVO had the leading edge (literally) with slightly more definition and precision. But
the Supreme Classic was also quite nice with (in direct comparison) a little more warmth
and "lushness". Comparing the new Supreme EVO range in general with the EVO range
and Classic Supreme range it seems that Mundorf has succeeded in combining the
detailed and precise nature of the EVO with the rich and spatious nature of the Supreme.
Sounding more mature than the basic EVO range and having more contrast than the
Supreme Classic range. If you actually need more contrast is up to you.
Verdict: 10,5
Mundorf MCap Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil 800VDC - 2% tolerance
Sound: The Mundorf MCap Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil is a very clean, detailed and
open sounding capacitor. Even more finely detailed than it's stable mate the Supreme
Classic Silver Gold Oil. The soundstage is produced with lots of contrast, great depth and
heaps of micro detail. Due to this very precise nature I found the Supreme EVO Silver
Gold Oil to mate very well with calm and smooth sounding systems, giving them a nice
leading edge without making them too bright. The amount of decay of notes and the
acoustic reverb of the recording venue are other nice attributes to the Supreme EVO
Silver Gold Oil. I know that capacitor choise is also a matter of implementation and
system matching but quite often I found myself preferring the Supreme Classic Silver
Gold Oil over the Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil because the Classic is a little more
forgiving and a tad smoother in the top two octaves. For the Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil
to perform at its best, the rest of the system must be absolutely perfect. If the system
even has the slightest hint of edgyness, the EVO can tip the overall tonal balance too
much in the "accurate" direction, if you know what I mean. I found the best combination
was when it was used with soft dome tweeters, the leading edge of the capacitor mixing
extremely nicely with the smooth character of soft domes. When used with metal domes
the overall sound becomes too bright. Or if you look at it the other way around: first
build your loudspeakers around the Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil and then fine tune the
rest of your system to match it. Comparing the new Supreme EVO range in general with
the EVO range and Supreme Classic range it seems that Mundorf has succeeded in
combining the detailed and precise nature of the EVO with the rich and spatious nature of
the Supreme. Sounding more mature than the EVO range and having more contrast than
the Supreme Classic range. If you actually need more contrast is up to you. All in all I
found the Mundorf MCap Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil to be one of the best capacitors
available, even if it is a little picky in regards to choise of tweeter it is used with. I had
the best results in combination with soft-dome tweeters.
Verdict: 12-
Sound: The MCap Supreme delivers an open and spatial sound with lots of depth. Good
reproduction of the musical nuances with detail and depth from the high treble right
down into the low mid-range without exaggerating things. Clear and transparent
sounding cap with a good sound stage. They provide a good improvement in clarity,
focus and dynamics compared to standard quality MKP's and sound "meatier" than the
Mundorf MCap EVO Silver Gold Oil, more mature and a tad warmer sounding as well. The
degree of improvement is comparable to upgrading to high-end cables and interconnects.
I must say I was impressed when I first auditioned them many years ago and I still like
to use them. Where as cheaper capacitors get can lost when fed complex materal, the
Mundorf MCap Supreme keeps the overview on things like a full scale orchestra. I also
found that the Mundorf MCap Supreme mixes very nicely with Clarity Cap SA capacitors.
Verdict: 10
Sound: The MCap Supreme Silver Oil is one of my favourite capacitors! I can only
underline what Mundorf states: wonderfully spacious and detailed sound reproduction,
full and smooth tonal richness and diversity. This capacitor's ability to bring out the finest
nuances and the subtlest distinctions make the music sound more alive and "juicy".
Music detail and depth throughout from top to bottom. Very smooth and liquid. To
exaggerate things: it makes a standard Supreme Cap sound slightly rough!
Verdict: 11
Sound: Nicely clear and transparent, rich textured treble, very spacious; front to back
and left to right, very good separation of the individual instruments, deep black
background, clean and dynamic, heaps of micro-detail information, the details get high-
lighted a little but nothing to worry about. I know one could easily think that this
capacitor must be good because everyone says so and it is very expensive but I have
tried to keep my objective view and even so I am very impressed. Were I would describe
the Silver/Oil as extremely neutral, I would describe the Silver/Gold as extremely natural
if you know what I mean. Acoustic instruments like a viola da gamba sound really life-
like. In comparison to the Duelund VSF-Cu copper-foil capacitor they can sound a little
bright in the top-end, but this can be a plus point if you want to brighten up a dull
sounding system or you just dig those so-called high-end recordings with bells, chimes
and things. They are by no means harsh, just on the clear side of neutral sometimes.
Verdict: 12-
Technical specifications (according to manufacturer): "The MCap Supreme Silver Gold Oil
is definitely the top-of-the line model of our oil impregnated capacitors. In comparison
with the Silver/Oil version, it technically features a further extended lifetime. More
importantly, sonically the Silver/Gold/Oil version stands out due to its wonderful natural
singing and exceptional micro dynamic, same time. Capacitance: 0.010uF-10uF;
Dielectric: Polyprophylene; Metallisation: 99.99% silver, 1% gold; Purity of silver: min.
99.97% typ. 99.99%; Purity of gold: min. 99.97% typ. 99.99%".
Sound: At this level we are talking about a really serious capacitor, so my findings are
relative to other exotic types. They are richer and better layered than the Mundorf Silver
Gold (without the oil) and they seem more open and more spatial. Compared to the
Duelund VSF-Cu they are not as rich in harmonic overtones. The Duelund VSF-Cu creates
smoother harmonics and a better midrange balance but the Mundorf Silver Gold Oil really
excels in image depth - call it bowling alley depth! In direct comparison, the Duelund
VSF-Cu sounds flatter (a bit more 2D) and a little rounded-off at the top. Like most
Mundorf capacitors, the Silver Gold Oil has a slight hint of top-end emphasis, this
probably contributes to the perceived spatiality and micro-detailing. But I am very happy
to live with that, these capacitors are so quiet and really let you look very deep into the
recording!
Verdict: 12+
North Creek Crescendo Film and Foil MKP 200VDC - 10% tolerance
Sound: Well all the above is just sales talk! Okay, they are very good capacitors with
good separation of the individual instruments and a nice deep sound stage but the major
drawback is they have a sort of loudness built-in, I prefer components to be more
neutral. Like with the Hovland Musicap (of which they remind me of the most) I have a
love / hate relationship with them: they don't mate with all types of tweeters, they dont
make an excellent match for most aluminium and titanium domes. I tried them in the
HATT-MkIII and felt like wanting to increase the L-pad function of the tweeter. If in series
with a very nice soft-dome tweeter they seem to bring out more detail than usual from
such a tweeter compared to when used with other, more round sounding caps. I had
good results with the Seas Excel tweeter used in the (Mezzo) Proteus but other soft-
domes should also benefit the same way. If your system tends to be a little on the bright
or clinic side they might sound awful. But you do get more detail and a better sound
stage compared to if you used an Audyn Cap QS or Le Clanché. Here's a good tip: Use
them in combination with other caps; they will clean up a cheap Intertechnik Audyn Cap
just nicely creating a well-balanced sound.
Verdict: 8
Obbligato aluminium-foil MKP 630VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: Analogue is the word that keeps popping-up in my head when trying to describe
these capacitors. They have a rich texture and produce an open and smooth image with
realistic dynamics and good retrieval of ambient information. They have slightly less
depth than a Clarity Cap DTAC but are also very detailed and never get harsh. They
seem to have a sort of detailed warmth about them. In a direct comparison to the Clarity
Cap PX, I would say that they are in the same league up to / into the midrange; however
the Obbligato have more definition in the upper mid and treble; tones such as an
acoustic guitar or solo violin attacks seem to gain in clarity and have better separation,
the image seems to be less flat. Therefore the timbre of instruments is a bit more
accurate with more air in between, allowing a more naturalness of the sound scene.
Though they have higher definition, they are never harsh nor harsher than the smooth
Clarity Cap PX and let me hear some nice but soft inner details. That's probably why I
define them as "analogue".
Verdict: 10-
Sound: pleasant “analogue” approach to music with a nice clear, smooth presentation
and good separation. Left to right imaging and front to back sound stage is realistic but
not as open as the dry type Obbligato. Also the overall balance is a little more forward
than the Obbligato aluminium foil type, especially fresh out of the box. So give them
some time to burn-in.
Verdict: 9
Sound: I find the Panasonic EZP-E to be one of the most neutral sounding capacitors
available in the low to medium budget range. Nothing stands out and I mean that in a
positive way. Being so neutral means that they can be mixed with a large range of other
capacitors to obtain your favourite "taste". For example I did this with the Tempo Two
loudspeaker: take a neutral woofer, a neutral tweeter, the neutral Panasonic EZP-E and
add a bit of pepper and salt with the Mundorf Supreme EVO Oil. To put is simply: the
Panasonic EZP-E isn't fussy and just gets the job done.
Verdict: 8+
Sound: The Rike Audio M-PP produces a well rendered image placed a little more forward
than for example the Clarity Cap SA and with a fraction more detail than the Audience
Auricap. Relatively speaking the image is also quite large, not as large as what the (more
expensive) Jantzen Audio Superior Z-Cap can do, but bigger than standard MKP's like the
Intertechnik MKP-QS. With the Rike Audio M-PP there seems to be a little emphasis on
the lower treble forming a contrast with capacitors like the Mundorf EVO Oil that have
some emphasis on the top part of the treble. Although they have this tonal balance there
is still a slighty light-weight presentation that could do with a little more "body". But that
is something I often encouter with lower cost capacitors, so nothing to worry about at all.
Verdict: 8
Rike Audio Q-CAP 600VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: I found the Rike Audio Q-Cap to be neutral with a nice balance between dynamics
and smoothness, sort of snappy, tidy and rich at the same. Switching to the Intertechnik
Audyn Cap Tri-Reference seems things to sound a little dull, switching back to the Q-Cap
brings you closer to what is happening. The Tri-Reference is strictly speaking closer to
absolute neutrality. The general overview of the Q-Cap is very good and also has a tad
more dynamic expression than the Jupiter Copper-Paper-Wax, which in a direct A-B
comparsion has a fraction more flow. The Q-Cap has plenty of detail although not to the
same extent and clarity that you get with the Mundorf Supreme Silver Gold Oil. This does
make the overall presentation of the Q-Cap more relaxing to listen to. Comparing the
Rike Audio Q-Cap with the very neutral (and less expensive) Jantzen Audio Superior Z-
Cap you know what you pay the extra for: the Q-Cap produces a bigger image, especially
when it comes to things like the width of the sound-stage. Also there is a more
convincing placing of the instruments in an orchestra. Vocalists and solo violin stand at
the front of the sound-stage. One of the things I listen for when evaluating capacitors is
how well the harmonic overtones, which determine the timbre of an instrument, are
portrayed. This the Rike Audio Q-Cap does very well. Listening to traditional Chinese
guzheng music on 24bit / 96kHz flac's or Armenian duduk ensembles on multi-channel
SACD, I got the impression of a very tangible presentation with rich timbres. In direct
comparison it made the Mundorf Supreme Silver Gold Oil sound a tad "plastic" in the top
most registers of these traditional instruments. On the other hand the Mundorf Supreme
Silver Gold Oil did very well with jazz drum-kits, giving ride cymbals and brushes a bit
more "edge". In general when the Q-Cap is compared to other copper-foil types, you
could say that the other types that use paper between the copper foil could be described
as sounding "traditional" and the Q-Cap that uses polyproylene between the copper-foil
sounds "modern". Neither is better than the other, just different and it will depend on
personal taste and system matching which character you prefer. All in all I quite like the
Rike Audio Q-Cap, a welcome newcomer to the top range of capacitors.
Verdict: 12,5
Rike Audio S-Cap-2 600VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Rike Audio S-Cap-2 produces a well rendered image that is quite spatious.
Nothing is emphasized (a good thing) and the overall tonal balance is quite neutral. If
there is one thing that could be said about their character is that they sound a little more
dynamic than other neutral sounding capacitors. Compared to a totally different kind of
capacitor like the Mundorf Supreme EVO Silver Gold Oil, that has heaps of detail, the
Rike Audio S-Cap-2 sounds a little flatter in presentation but also more "correct" and
overall more pleasent to live with for longer listening sessions. The S-Cap-2 is therefore
easier to implement in a wider range of situations than (for example) the top range
Mundorf's that can sometimes be a bit picky.
Verdict: 11
Technical specifications: Tinned solid-core lead-out version of the Solen Fast Cap PB-
MKP-FC.
Sound: The Solen MKP-PB are a fraction better than the Intertechnik Audyn Cap QS
(what isn't) but are still rather flat and lack depth and transparency. Rather coarse
compared to the cheaper range Clarity Caps like the PW and APW series but they do have
a similar, reasonably neutral tonal balance. What they have going for them is their very
low cost, to get more spatial information and better definition you would have to look at
a slightly more expensive Mundorf RXF for example if you really want to improve things.
Verdict: 6+
Sound: The Solen Fast cap is a good step up from MKT capacitors often found in standard
quality factory built speakers. Like the standard Intertechnik Audyn Cap nothing wrong
with them but also nothing exciting, but if I had to choose between the two I would still
go for the Solen, they seem to have a fraction more musicality to them, small difference
but noticable in a direct A-B comparison. Compared with electrolytics they have much
more detail, smoothness and a wider stereo image. Compared to a Mundorf Supreme
Cap they sound closed-in. Midrange is slightly forward compared to more neutral caps,
they can be a little nasal sounding in some configurations. Due to this character they
would make a good match with Focal tweeters for example. Low priced cap, same quality
as SCR and Angela branded capacitors, same sizes. Why? Because they are exactly the
same! If you have a tight budget then this is a good choice and they are available in a
very wide range of capacitance values, also non-standard values!
Verdict: 6+
Sound: The Solen Fast Cap PPE-MKP-FC is basically a neutral sounding capacitor for
general use. Nothing special but also nothing bad at all. They bring voices and
intruments (in that same frequency range) a little forward on the sound-stage making
things intimate but at times this can make the overall presentation a little congested.
Like the Solen PB-MKP-FE they are a good step up from standard MKT capacitors often
found in factory built speakers. If you are on a tight budget, the Solen Fast Cap PPE-
MKP-FC is a capacitor that should be on your short-list.
Verdict: 7
Solen Fast Cap Silver Sound (AGM) 700VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: The Solen Fast Cap Silver Sound has a lot of clarity, not as much as a Mundorf
MCap EVO Oil but more than the Solen SB tin foil. The overall character is quite pleasent
with a nice balance between clarity and richness of harmonic overtones. These overtones
seem to have more body than the overtones done by the Mundorf. The treble is "fleshy",
clear and open. The overall presentation is not as tangible as with a Mundorf MCap
Supreme EVO Oil, in direct comparison the Silver Sound sounds a tad flatter and
congested. The Mundorf has more top end fine detail which also makes it a tad more
spatious. But the Silver Sound does sound less thin than the Mundorf, with more body,
making it richer when used with classical music and other well recorded acoustic stuff.
Verdict: 8+
Verdict: 9
Sound: Compared to a standard Mundorf M-Cap they are more transparent and clearer
with lots more depth. Putting a 0,01uF Vishay MKP1837 parallel to them (a good tweak
for nearly any capacitor) can create even more detail and separation! They reveal micro-
information in a way that reminds me of a Hovland Musicap but without the Hovland
loudness effect. I didn't find them to mix well with other caps - a 50/50 mix with a
standard Mundorf M-Cap gave me the funny sensation of listening to two different cap's
at the same time. I can advise them if you are looking for a high-end cap but are on a
relatively tight budget. Quite nice :-)
Verdict: 8,5
Super PP capacitor (SPP) MKP 400VDC - 5% tolerance
Sound: First of all they need a much longer burn-in time than most capacitors, in the
beginning they are rather aggressive. After burn-in I still find the top-end over-etched
which gives it a slightly artificial treble. They are well detailed but I find the midrange a
little under exposed, maybe they would work well in a dull sounding speaker. Spatiality is
good, probably due to the high-lighted top-end and this also gives them a tidy charater
with good overview of what's happening all around the sound-stage. Separation is only
average but considering their relatively low price they perform quite well. The top end is
clean and slightly warmish at the same time.
Verdict: 8+
Sound: Their name does describe them a bit: they have a wide dynamic range and sound
fast and quiet - dynamics are nice and snappy, but at the same time they are not very
subtle or delicate, they seem to grab attention and run away with it. Now I do find
dynamics to be one of the most important factors in the aim to reproduce recorded music
in a lifelike manner, but the DynamiCaps seem to lack coherency and make the music
nervous and therefore fatiguing - not relaxing at all. At first they are impressive but soon
they become distracting and get you listening to things like transparency, transients and
detail instead of listening to the music! Use them if you want to spice things up a bit,
some might call them revealing, I find them grainy. Also imaging is a little compromised,
compared to a Clarity Cap PX they sound a little on the flat side, a Clarity Cap PX has
more space and depth. They do form a nice upgrade from standard quality MKP's and
work better as a midrange capacitor than a capacitor in the signal-path of the tweeter.
Verdict: 7,5
VCap CuTF Copper Foil and Fluoropolymer Film 0,01uF 600VDC bypass - 5% tolerance
Sound: After near endless burn-in time the main thing that stands out with the VCap
CuTF used as a bypass capacitor is the great transparancy and air it gives to recordings.
The top end of the spectrum come across with light-footed, fine detail retrieving lots of
ambient information such as concert hall acoustics, etc. This is especially noticable with
recordings of classical music, but popular music also benefits from increased depth in the
sound stage and sort of "high pressure hose down" of the recording. The CuTF can be
used as a bypass capacitor basically anywhere in a loudspeaker crossover, in series and
in parallel positions. Now this is where I find it difficult to say which is "best". Objectively
speaking I would say that the Duelund bypass capacitors and the VCap are on the same
high sound quality level, all letting you retrieve more information from a recording,
resulting in more overall enjoyment :-) Subjectively speaking I would say that I
personally prefer the Duelund JDM Silver bypass as I find it to give me more of what I
am looking for in music: realism and of richness of tone. In contrast I find the
transparancy and air of the VCap CuTF (although fun) to sound like high-end audio. This
overall tidy and transparant character of the CuTF has less of the "being there" effect
that I found the Duelund bypass capacitors to do well, please read my description of the
Duelund tinned copper foil for how I listen to music. So all in all I really like the VCap
CuTF and when used as a bypass capacitor it is equally good as the Duelund Cu-Ag and
Duelund Cu-Sn bypass capacitors, just totally different.
Verdict: add about 2 points to whatever capacitor you are connecting it in parallel to.
Sound: Well balanced, overall coherent sounding capacitor. It doesn't have as much
depth as the more high-end type capacitors and micro-detailing is limited but somehow it
did stay in the back of my head as nice and pleasent to listen to. You can boost the
overall presentation a lot by adding 0,01uF's worth of MKP1837 parallel. So if you are
looking for a cost effective and very compact alternative to MKP capacitors like the Solen
Fast Cap, look no further!
Verdict: 6,5
Vishay MKP1837 / 0,01uF MKP 100VDC - 1% tolerance
Sound: To get straight to the point they don't change a Supreme into a Supreme Silver-
Oil but they really do clear things up. I must admit I was sceptical at first as the value is
only 10nF (0,01uF) - and the caps I was using at the time totalled to 12,6uF. The
difference is most noticeable with classical music but also good quality recordings of jazz
and fusion benefit: No change in sound stage width or depth but there is more concert-
hall acoustics that let you get into the recording more. Not as liquid as a Mundorf Silver
Oil but they did take away the slightly grainy edge from the Mundorf Supreme's. A
noticable gain in clarity and transparency making instruments better separable from each
other, the violins in an orchestra become a group of individual violins instead of one
mass. Jazz drum brushes sound more like a brush than a "shush.
Verdict: 8
Sound: The Vishay MKP1839HQ's main character is that of a certain full-bodied lower
treble range with a calm top-end. Compared to a more bright sounding capacitor like the
Mundorf MCap Evo Aluminium they seem slighty warmer but they do lack some depth,
the overall presentation is a bit flat but in line with other standard quality MKP's. On the
plus side they have a relatively open sound making them good on solo violin or cello for
example. Slightly less well suited for rock music or heavily processed recordings.
Personally I prefer them of capacitors like the Intertechnik Audyn Cap QS or a Solen Fast
Cap for being a tad more lively.
Verdict: 7
Vishay Sprague 730P MKP 250VDC - 10% tolerance
Sound: They remind me a bit of a Hovland Musicap or Dynamicap: they have a wide
dynamic range and sound "fast" and "quiet" - dynamics are nice and snappy, but at the
same time they are not very subtle or delicate. At first they are impressive but soon they
become distracting and get you listening to things like transparency, transients and detail
instead of listening to the music if you know what I mean. Use them if you want to spice
things up a bit. Imaging is quite good and they do form a nice upgrade from standard
quality MKP's but work better as a midrange capacitor than a capacitor in the signal-path
of the tweeter.
Verdict: 8
Sound: Similar in character to its larger brother the WIMA MKP 10 but less clear and with
a smaller sound-stage. Reasonably neutral and never harsh. Compared to a Clarity Cap
APW you get a more open presentation with better separation. Nice compact build
designed for use on PCB's so that can be a reason why one may prefer it above an Axon
True Cap for example.
Verdict: 7-
Verdict: 8
Sound: Good overall neutral sound that is never harsh but does have a bit of a "plastic"
sounding treble. The top-end is silky and smooth. Imaging is a bit flat with not much
depth. In direct comparison to the Vishay MKT1822 there is more transparency but less
coherency.
Verdict: 6
© Humble Homemade Hifi - The Netherlands - June 2002. Updated: May 2003,
September 2003, January 2004, February 2004, October 2004, July 2005, April 2006,
September 2007, March 2008, September 2008, February 2009, June 2009, February
2010, December 2010, December 2011, April 2013, July 2013, April 2014, August 2014,
June 2015, March 2016, May 2017, May 2018. Due to continuous testing Humble
Homemade Hifi has the right to change information without notice.
Last updated 16.2.2024