Electrospun Nanofibers New Generation Ma Free Good
Electrospun Nanofibers New Generation Ma Free Good
Electrospun Nanofibers New Generation Ma Free Good
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Electrospinning (E-spin) is a unique technique to fabricate polymeric as well as metal oxide nanofibers.
Received 6 October 2016 Research on electrospun nanofibers is a very active field in material science owing to their novel appli-
Received in revised form 10 December 2016 cations in diverse domains. The main focus of this review is to provide an insight into E-spin technique
Accepted 3 January 2017
by understanding the working principle, influencing parameters and applications of nanofibers in differ-
Available online 25 January 2017
ent walks of life. Several hundreds of papers are published on the preparation, modification and applica-
tions of nanofibers produced by E-spin technique in the areas like sensor development, decontamination,
Keywords:
energy storage, biomedical and catalysis etc. Details on the industrial scale development of E-spin tech-
Electrospinning technique
Nanofibers
nique, current scenario and future developments are also covered in this review.
Adsorbent Ó 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Catalyst
Sensor
Biomedical
Energy & environment
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2. History and evolution of E-spun NFs research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3. Working principle, instrumentation and operational parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.1. Working principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.2. Instrumentation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.3. Operational parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.3.1. Solution parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.3.2. Instrumental parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.3.3. Ambient parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4. Applications of electrospun nanofibers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.1. Biomedical applications of E-spun nanofibers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.1.1. Wound dressing material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.1.2. Scaffolds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.1.3. Drug delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.2. Applications of E-spun NFs in chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.2.1. Catalyst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.2.2. Cells and batteries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.3. Applications of E-spun nanofibers in defence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.3.1. Protective clothing and sensors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.4. Applications of E-spun nanofibers in environmental protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.4.1. Removal of toxic wastes by NFs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
⇑ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (N. Dharmaraj).
URL: http://ndharmaraj.wix.com/inrl (N. Dharmaraj).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2017.01.001
0921-5107/Ó 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48 37
Table 1
A comprehensive account on the advancements in E-spin technique.
Fig. 2. Images of three different electrospinning heads; series, elliptic and concen-
tric pipes. Reprinted from ref [30].
Table 2
List of category-wise factors influencing E-spin process.
Table 3
Various solvents and precursors used for the fabrication of ceramic NFs.
large production of fibers. Co-axial E-spin consists of two syringe ite. An increase in the concentration of polymer solution from 8 to
and single needle; both the syringes contain solutions of different 12 wt% increased the fiber diameter by 50 nm due to the viscosity
polymers/precursors those are probably immiscible and hence change of the spinning solution (Fig. 3). Similar observation on the
impossible to use mono axial E-spin instrument. Co-axial E-spin effect of solution viscosity on the size of the nanofibers was
has got much attention due to the formation of modified NFs such reported earlier [41].
as, hollow NFs, core-sheath NFs and uni-axially aligned NFs. In the case of composite nanofibers, the polymer solution is
Waclaw Tomaszewski and Marek Szadkowski investigated the mixed with the precursor solution and then fed to E-spin for the
use of multi-jet E-spin for the fabrication of NFs. They utilized fabrication. The precursor may be a metal salt solutions (or)
three types of spinning pipes’ of E-spin heads such as series, elliptic nanoparticles. They are mixed with the suitable solvent (or) poly-
and concentric (Fig. 2) and proved that the latter two facilitated the mer solution to attain the required viscosity for electrospinning.
process by using 10 or more spinning pipes [30]. During the fabrication, the solvent gets evaporated due to its travel
The other major part of E-spin is the collector. They are of many from the tip of the nozzle to the collector. For this reason, suitable
types which include drum collector, plate collector, parallel plate, solvents need to be selected for a particular precursor. Table 3
cocoon, and disc collector etc. The choice of a suitable collector gives an account on the solvent, precursor, applied voltage and
depends mainly on the nature of application associated with the diameter of the fibers formed from electrospinning with identical
fabricated nanofibers. However, drum collectors are mostly used instrumental parameters.
to get well aligned and nanosized fibers in laboratory level exper- Viscosity, surface tension and conductivity are the major inter-
iments. Aluminium foil surrounded on the drum collector acts as related solution properties that directly influence the spinability of
the conducting material which collects the fibers. the solution. Viscosity of the spinning solution is one of the critical
Instrumental parameters such as needle tip, solution volume, aspects in fiber forming technology that can be determined by
gauge diameter and modified syringe could be selected based on varying the concentration of the polymer solution [54]. Solutions
the needle type of E-spin instrument. Needleless type of E-spin is with optimum viscosity only yield the respective fibers in the
beneficial for the large scale production of nanofibers in industries. micro to nano scale diameters. On the other hand, solutions with
both very low and high viscosity led to the formation of beaded
3.3. Operational parameters fibers.
Surface tension is defined as the force exerted in the plane of
Various parameters those influence the spinning of polymer the surface per unit length [1]. During E-spin process, the applied
solution are provided in Table 2. voltage needs to be high enough to overcome the surface tension
of the spinning solution to produce nanofibers. Solvents also fluc-
3.3.1. Solution parameters tuates the surface tension to some extent. Yang and his group
Selection of a suitable polymer for electrospinning depends on reported that the different solvents exert different surface ten-
the end use of NFs. Nanotube encapsulated nanofibers of conduc- sions. They reported that by reducing the surface tension of the
tive polymers find applications in/as sensors, electrode materials solution without changing the concentration, beaded fibers could
and bio-active materials due to their ability to stimulate electrical be converted into smooth fibers [55].
charges present inside the molecules. Nanofibers of chitosan, the Conductivity of the solution plays a key role in fiber formation
natural, crystalline biopolymer were fabricated by Kumber et al., process. Ce Wang and co-workers observed that the natural poly-
[40]. They prepared chitosan NFs using the derivative of 2- mers show higher surface tension (due to its polyelectrolytic nat-
nitrobenzyl-chitosan obtained by mixing different concentration ure) under the electric field in contrast to the synthetic polymers.
of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde with chitosan. These imino-chitosan Therefore, it results in a poor fibers formation when compared to
derivatives are very good candidates for protection against bacte- synthetic one. Conductivity of the spinning solution can be
ria, fungi and yeast. increased by adding salts such as NaCl, KCl and KBr. Generally,
The molecular weight (M. wt.) of chosen polymer is an impor- increase in conductivity results in the decrease in the diameter of
tant factor that alters the characteristics of NFs. Same polymer of the fibers and thus produce thinner fibers [53].
different molecular weight produces fibers of different diameter
[41,42]. Polymers of optimal molecular weight should be selected 3.3.2. Instrumental parameters
for smooth and continuous NFs. In 2012, Sahoo and Panda reported Flow of the solution by applied pressure is called as flow rate.
the preparation and characterisation of barium titanate nanofibers Generally, lower flow rate of the solution favours the polarisation
using E-spin technique. They made a concentration dependent of the polymer solution. The increase in flow of 1 mL/min leads
study with PVP using 8–12% weight with barium titanate compos- to the formation of beaded fibers. Diameter and shape of the gauge
40 S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48
changes the fibers diameter and morphology respectively. Increase The alignment/orientation of the fibers primarily depends on
in gauge size effects the fibers of micro scale diameter meanwhile the type of collector used such as pin, plate, cross bar, rotating rods
change in the shape of gauge (sphere and elliptic) will affect the or wheels, drum, liquid bath and disk etc. Generally, nanofibers of
fibers morphology. proper orientation are fabricated using a disk collector. Younan Xia
Diameter of the E-spun fibers changes with the change in the et al., designed a home-made collector by introducing a novel gap
applied voltage. Several research groups have demonstrated that technique for aligned fibers of PVP/tetramethyl ammonium chlo-
the fiber diameter varies by changing the applied voltage [27,56– ride solution using two silicon stripes (with certain gap) as collec-
58]. Compared with other instrumental parameters of E-spin, tor [60]. In this technique, the NFs experienced two types of forces,
applied voltage has limited influence on the diameter of nanofi- one from the splitting applied voltage and the other charges on the
bers. The distance from the tip of the needle to collector gives an surface of the silicon stripes by charged electrospun NFs. They
ample opportunity for the solvent to get evaporated. Lesser the dis- reported that the denser NFs could be obtained by increasing the
tance, thicker/beaded fibers might be formed whereas more dis- collection time and reducing the gap between the Si stripes as
tance results in the discontinuous fibers. Hence, by fixing other shown in Fig. 4. Interestingly, some NFs changed their direction
thing constant, variation in the distance between tip and collector perpendicular to the edges (marked by arrows in Fig. 4d) before
will have a pronounced effect on the fibers morphology [59]. entering the Si stripes. These change in orientation further sup-
ported the two types of forces on the fibers.
Fig. 5. SEM images of E-spun PLLA fibers as a function of collector temperature; (a) room temperature (21 °C), (b) 40 °C, (c) 50 °C, (d) 60 °C and (e) 70 °C.
S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48 41
Fig. 6. Diagrammatic illustration to high light the practical applications of E-spun NFs
High humidity will lead to thick fibers of enlarged diameter. Rabolt cles are reported to exhibit efficient antimicrobial potential for bet-
et al., reported that the increase in humidity produces porous NFs. ter curing. Recently, attention turn on nanofibers decorated with
The optimised humidity for the fabrication of polystyrene NFs was nanoparticles and their activity against micro-organisms. In
less than 25% [62]. Hence, optimum level of humidity should be 2014, the work published by Il Keun Kwon et al., has well demon-
maintained for appropriate porous NFs. strated that the silver nanoparticles containing chitosan (CS) NFs
were prepared using E-spin technique. The prepared NFs showed
4. Applications of electrospun nanofibers chelate ion between silver and amine group of chitosan. CS NFs
were tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and
E-spun nanofibers are characterised with large surface area to Methicillin-resistant Stapylococcusaureus (MRSA) which revealed
volume ratio, a beneficial property for application as scaffolds, sen- that NFs are more effective on P. aeruginosa than MRSA [63]. This
sors, filters, membranes, batteries, protective clothing, wound study demonstrated that the chitosan was inactive against the
dressing and catalyst. In the early stages, applications in biomedi- tested micro-organisms, wherein silver nanoparticles loaded chi-
cal and tissue engineering field enlightened research on nanofibers. tosan NFs exhibited significant activity by restricting the respira-
Over the years, applications were also extended to many fields tion of micro-organism due to attraction of positively charged
(Fig. 6) based on the surface and chemical properties of nanofibers. silver nanoparticles on the negatively charged cell membrane.
Table 4 lists few applications of NFs prepared by E-spin technique. Mathew group [92] also reported the formation of chitosan/PEO
nanofibers reinforced with chitin nanocrystals isolated from crab
4.1. Biomedical applications of E-spun nanofibers shells using hydrochloric acid. They prepared two different NF
mats, without chitosan (M100) as control and the other was chitin
4.1.1. Wound dressing material reinforced mats (M50ChNC50) with random and cross-linked ori-
Wound dressing is an essential step for rapid healing of the entations. They have added ‘‘genipin solution” to both M100 and
affected part and also offers protection against infection due to M50ChNC50 NFs for the preparation of cross-linked mats XM100
micro-organisms. Conventional wound dressing materials include and XM50ChNC50 respectively. SEM and AFM images of the sam-
hydrocolloids, hydrogels and alginate salts. Also, silver nanoparti- ples are shown in Fig. 7A and B, respectively. Randomly oriented,
42 S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48
Table 4
Applications of E-spun NFs in different fields.
Fig. 7. (A) SEM images of (a) M100, (b) M50ChNC50 (c) XM100 and (d) XM50ChNC50 (B) AFM images of (a) M100, (b) M50ChNC50 and (c) XM50ChNC50. Reprinted from ref
[92], copyright 2014, with permission from Elsevier.
S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48 43
porous, smooth fibers of simple chitosan/PEO (M100) with dis- of 4 h. The release mechanism proved that the initial burst fol-
persed nanocrystalline chitin were observed from Fig. 7A (a). How- lowed by sustained release of CZ as a result of dissolution of sur-
ever, cross linking with genipin solution altered the morphology face moieties followed by layer by layer as discussed in Higuchi’s
and porous structure of the resulting nanofiber as a function of pseudo steady state approach. These nanofibrous mats also exhib-
concentration of PEO and chitin as well as the solubility of PEO ited very good antimicrobial activity with less toxicity.
in water (Fig. 7A (c and d)). AFM images (Fig. 7B) also supported
the results of the SEM images related to the fiber morphology 4.1.3. Drug delivery
and number of pores after cross linking of M100 and M50ChNC50 In vitro studies on the delivery pattern of an antibiotic drug
NFs. An essential criterion for better wound dressing material is a loaded into nanofibrous mats was carried out by Zong et al. They
good water transmission quality. All the above four samples have produced mefoxin loaded PDLLA NFs by optimising the instrumen-
very good water holding capacity by adsorption and swelling. Par- tal parameters such as electric field, concentration, salt addition
ticularly, cross linked fibers possess more tensile strength and high and feeding rate. As-prepared NF membrane was treated in a
Young’s modulus with appropriate flexibility. Cyto-compatibility 20 mL buffer solution for in vitro drug release study. Complete
test done using cells comprising adipose derived (ASCs) stem cells release of the drug at 48 h was confirmed from the release profile
and L929 cell line demonstrated that all those mats were compat- [56].
ible with adipose derived stem cells after 7 days and hence a Recently, several new drugs are designed to cure cancer disease
potential candidate for wound dressing application. efficiently. Common cancer treatments have many limitations such
as clinical toxicity in radiotherapy, toxicity to healthy cells by over-
4.1.2. Scaffolds dose of drugs in chemotherapy and limited distribution of drugs in
Experiment to grow cells and tissues in laboratory is an intense blood vessels. In this connection, nanofibers extend its role in can-
field of research for human welfare. One of the major develop- cer therapy by easier drug carrier and release material. Shaobing
ments behind tissue engineering is the scaffold formation. The Zhouand co-workers developed a new device with core-shell nano-
polymers for scaffold materials are chosen by their hydrophobic fibers as implant material for safe and effective cancer treatment. It
and hydrophilic nature, drug adhesion and release tendency as is an excellent work in which the folate-conjucated PEG/PCL
well as the type of mat structure. High surface area and short dif- copolymer layered micelle with drug (doxorubicin) loaded nanofi-
fusion passage length of nanofibers increased their use as scaffold bers prepared by co-axial E-spin technique (Fig. 8). Core and shell
material by higher rate of drug release than the bulk material. of the nanofibers were micelle/PVA and gelatin solution respec-
Nanofibers are reported to possess control over the drug release tively. These nanofibrous mats with the micelle examined for ther-
and hence improved its efficiency towards the sustained discharge apeutic action revealed efficient killing of tumour cells, with
of drug rather than the burst release. Protein drug loaded nanofi- minimal loading of drug and reduced frequency of drug adminis-
brous scaffold prepared by Unnithan and Kim group consisted of tration and thereby improved the survival of affected people
Polyurethane (PU)/cellulose acetate (CA)/zein composite NFs mats [93]. Though many advantages are associated with core-shell
loaded with streptomycin, an antimicrobial drug [67]. Soft, model, it suffers from limitations such as barrier to cross the blood
hydrophobic and good oxygen permeable PEO was mixed with vessels, limited solubility and nonspecific uptake of the drug.
hydrophilic CA for adsorption of moisture or pus from the wound.
An antimicrobial drug was incorporated into the NFs to inhibit the 4.2. Applications of E-spun NFs in chemistry
growth of micro-organism. Then, the mat was loaded with zein
protein for better attachment and proliferation of cells with good 4.2.1. Catalyst
blood clotting ability. These composite NFs showed efficient anti- Ramakrishna et al., published a review article in 2012 on the E-
bacterial activity, blood clotting and platelet activation ability. spun composite NFs and their multifaceted applications in various
Blood clotting and platelet activation study was done by optical fields such as energy, filter membranes, smart materials, sensors
density measurement. Cell attachment study was conducted using and biotechnology [39]. E-spun nanofibers proved to be an excel-
3T3-L1 fibroblast cell and quantified by MTT assay. Composite lent material as catalyst for organic transformations. Among the
fibers allowed the growth of cells inside the nanofibers where as several hundreds of reports compiled with nanofibers, significant
it was on the surface in neat PU fibers. Presence of hydrophilic zein numbers of them related to their applications as catalysts are
protein improves the cell attachment and cellulose acetate explained below. Nanofibers of poly(ethyleneimine)/poly(vinylalco
enhances the cell growth. Drug compound inhibits the growth of hol) (PEI/PVA) immobilized with gold nanoparticles were prepared
Escherichia coli K12-MG1655, Salmonella typhimurium, Vibrio vul- and utilized as a catalyst for reduction reaction [73]. It was found
nificus CMCP6, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 and Bacillus sub- that Au NPs of 11.8 nm size immobilized on PEI/PVA NFs of
tilis by the addition of Streptomycin drug on the NFs. 490 nm displayed excellent catalytic activity and re-usability for
Commercially formulated candidiasis of lozenges, mouthwash, the transformation of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol.
oral gels and suspensions exhibited initial burst and rapid decline Hiroyoshi Kawakami and group successfully prepared a position
to sub-therapeutic concentrations. To achieve the sustained release controlled porphyrin moieties on E-spun NFs by controlling the
of the drug as well as better therapeutic usage, micro-adhesive electrospinning parameters and considering the characteristics of
properties are needed for the scaffolds. Recently, a novel scaffold porphyrin moieties [94]. They prepared three different samples
for oral candidiasis application was reported by Praneet Opanaso- of NFs using 5,10,15,20-tetrakisphenyl-21-H,23-H-porphyrin(TP
pit and his group in the year 2015 using E-spin technique [70]. P),5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-yridyl)-21,23-H-porphyrin
Micro-emulsion was prepared by mixing oleic acid, Tween 80 (TMPyP) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)-porphyrin-
and co-surfactants like, benzyl alcohol (BzOH), ethyl alcohol, and manganese(III) chloride (Mn-TMPyP). In this study, the authors
isopropyl alcohol. Then, clotrimazole (CZ) was loaded on micro made a new kind of claim that the repulsion among cationic por-
emulsion and fabricated using chitosan/PVA polymer composite. phyrin molecules during E-spin process led to their arrangement
The fibrous mat showed very good CZ entrapment efficiency of at specific positions on the nanofibers. One of the types of NFs,
approximately 72.58–98.10%. Drug entrapment and delivery stud- Mn-TMPyP tested for anti-oxidant property by ‘‘Cytochrome C”
ies conducted for nanofibrous mat. The drug delivery rate could be method revealed a new way of radical scavengers for oxidative
altered by applying different formulation of micro emulsion. The stress therapies. Cellulose nanofibers functionalised with different
extent of drug release was found to be 64.81–74.15% after a period anions were prepared and properly decorated with noble metal
44 S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48
Fig. 8. Folate-conjucated PEG/PCL copolymer layered micelle (doxorubicin drug loaded) nanofibers prepared by co-axial E-spin technique. Adapted with permission from ref
[93], Ó 2015 American Chemical Society.
nanoparticles (Ru & Au) by Karvembu and his group [95]. They
applied this nanoparticles decorated NFs to understand the cat-
alytic behaviour towards the aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol
and aza-Micheal reaction. Surprisingly, they got 100% selectivity
with good yield (89% & 99%) in both type of reactions. Proposed
mechanism clearly explains the catalytic efficiency of Ru and Au
nanoparticles decorated on the cellulose acetate nanofibers. They
have checked the reusability and heterogeneity of the catalytic sys-
tem which reveals that catalyst could be reused efficiently up to
three times.
Inc.
2 1989-micro denier fibers DuPont [101]
150
3 1995-E-spin of nanofibers Reneker [23]
4 2008-Multinozzle electrospinning Finetex [102]
100 5 2009-Nozzle conjucate melt Teijin Fibers Ltd [103]
spinning
50 6 2011-Nozzle centrifugal spinning Fibe Rio Tech [104]
7 2012-Nozzless electrospinning Elmarco [105]
0
Biomedical
Defense Though the E-spun NFs have unique applications, still they
Environmental encounter some challenges in the production stage: (i) large vol-
Catalyst
protecƟon
ume processing (ii) reproducibility and (iii) safety. Some compa-
Fig. 11. PubMed results of ‘‘applications of electrospun nanofibers”. nies have contributed their efforts on it and constructed
equipment which could overcome these issues [101–105]. To
reduce the heavy power consumption during E-spinning and make
nitrogen fixation (urea) and abundant micro-nutrient (Co NPs). The it compatible, a battery operated handy E-spin instrument with
dissolution and release of PVP/urea/Co NPs was reported that the small volume (10.5 5 3 cm3) and light weight (about 120 g)
initial burst of PVP and then slow release of urea and cobalt was developed and tested in the laboratory level, recently [106].
enhances the germination and growth of the seed. By this method,
seeds of rare species could be stored for the long time and used at
appropriate time. Hence, this strategy will have much scope in 6. Current scenario and future work
future to explore a green revolution in agricultural sector.
To highlight the significance of E-spun nanofibers, a compara- Electrospinning is a promising technology to produce submi-
tive study on their applications was made with the help of ‘‘Pub- cron size fibers i.e., NFs from the laboratory level to industrial level.
Med” search engine and furnished in Fig. 11. The key words used Several hundreds of papers reported the preparation, characteriza-
for the search is ‘‘applications of electrospun nanofibers as wound tion and applications of NFs. Generally, nanomaterials possess
dressing, scaffold & drug delivery (collectively written as Biomed- large surface area, which is considered as an advantage for applica-
ical), sensors & protective clothing (mentioned as defence), solar tions in many fields. Particularly, electrospun nanofibers received
cell, batteries & adsorbent (denoted as environmental protection) special attention in biomedical field due to their biocompatibility,
and catalyst” as well as filters applied are journal article and adhesiveness and sterile nature. Applications are also extended to
5 years. areas like, filters, protective clothing, membranes, sensors, energy
storage devices and catalysis.
Currently, NFs are considered as suitable candidates in wound
5. Laboratory to industry dressing materials, scaffold materials, drug delivery systems, filtra-
tion membranes, catalyst for reduction, oxidation and coupling
In industries, large scale production of fibers is carried out reactions. Recently, few companies put forward their work on sup-
mainly by three types of spinning technologies. Melt spinning, ply of nanofibers for medical appliances. Batteries and fuel cells
solution spinning and emulsion spinning. Large scale production also utilize NFs as new material with enhanced energy storage
prefers melt spinning for the beneficial of environment (i.e., solvent capacity.
free method). Solution spinning requires suitable solvent to dis- Though vast majority of applications are reported already in
solve the precursor for fabrication. Emulsion spinning prefers poly- bio-medical, sensors and photo-catalytic field, still focus should
mers of high melting point [98]. be given in renewable energy storage devices and as catalysts
Laboratory level E-spin was carried out with syringe and needle (Fig. 11) for the synthesis of organic compounds, pharmaceuticals
type. However, manufacturing requires large volume of solution and fine chemicals. As of now, general preparatory methods for
for spinning. Needleless type of spinning consists of spinneret pharmaceuticals involve multiple steps under specialized reaction
(the set up includes syringe and needle) which could transform conditions. Hence, we believe that the electrospun nanofibers
large volume of solution into fibers. The scientific challenges asso- could be utilized as potential heterogeneous catalysts for organic
ciated with large scale production are clogging of the solution in reactions that might simplify the experimental protocol with com-
the holes of the nozzle, influence of electrical charge on the con- plete conversion of substrates to desired products as well as with
ductive nanofibers and inter-jet perturbation in needless spinneret low catalyst loading.
[99].
In 1934, Formhals filed his first patent for the invention of E-
spin instrument which was not much rewarded during that period, 7. Conclusion
due to the lack of characterisation techniques for the nanoscale
materials. After few decades, the development of imaging tech- Electrospinning is a simple and cost effective but fascinating
nique like SEM, TEM, AFM and STM revealed that E-spin is a won- fiber forming technology with less time consumption under opti-
derful technology for the preparation of nanofibers. It is evident mized conditions. This review article is the compilation of most
that studies on E-spun NFs are increasing continually due to their relevant information about the fundamental aspects of E-spin such
potential applications in various fields. Nowadays commercial E- as working principle, factors influencing the fiber formation and
spin equipment, accessories and E-spun fibers are available in proposed practical applications of NFs. Applications of E-spun
the market. List of companies those commercialised E-spin instru- NFs in biomedical, defence, environmental remediation and mate-
ment are given in Table 5. rial chemistry are presented. Particularly, use of E-spun NFs as
S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48 47
wound dressing material, sensors (toxins and gas) and scaffolds for [28] X. Zong, K. Kim, D. Fang, S. Ran, B.S. Hsiao, B. Chu, Polymer 43 (2002) 4403–
4412.
regenerative purpose (both tissue and organ), filters, protective
[29] D. Li, Y. Xia, Adv. Mater. 16 (2004) 14.
clothing, and drug carrier as well as delivery material are discussed [30] W. Tomaszewski, M. Szadkowski, Fibers Textiles 13 (2005) 22–26.
in detail for easy understanding by the readers. From a chemist [31] I.D. Kim, A. Rothschild, B.H. Lee, D.Y. Kim, S.M. Jo, H.L. Tuller, Nano Lett. 6
point of view, NFs are potential materials for fuel cells, solar cells, (2006) 2009–2013.
[32] S. Liao, B. Li, Z. Ma, H. Wei, C. Chan, S. Ramakrishna, Biomed. Mater. 3 (2006)
and batteries for energy harvest and storage drive. Nanofibers 45–53.
functionalized with other materials such as oxime grafted PAN, [33] S. Sundarrajan, S. Ramakrishna, J. Mater. Sci. 42 (2007) 8400–8407.
PAN functionalised with carboxylate anion, Al2O3/PAN NF, Au [34] M.M. Munir, H. Widiyandari, F. Iskandar, K. Okuyama, Nanotechnology 19
(2008) 375601.
incorporated PEA/PVA etc., served as better catalytic systems to [35] T.J. Sill, H.A. Recum, Biomaterials 29 (2008) 1989–2006.
degrade polluting dyes and organic compounds and also as cata- [36] N. Robin, R. Zang, K.K. Yang, N. Liu, S-T. Yang, RSC Adv. 2 (2012) 10110-1–
lysts for reduction, oxidation and coupling reactions. 10110-124.
[37] D. Lin, H. Wu, R. Zhang, W. Pan, Chem. Mater. 21 (2009) 3479.
Even though literature on electrospun NFs are aplenty, much [38] J.S. Park, Adv. Nat. Sci.: Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 1 (2010) 043002.
space is still available to the researchers to explore them with [39] R. Sahay, P. Sureshkumar, R. Sridhar, J. Sundaramurthy, J. Venugopal, S.G.
novel applications in the fields such as agriculture, formulation Mhaisalkar, S. Ramakrishna, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 12953.
[40] A.A. Nada, R. James, N.B. Shelke, M.D. Harmon, H.M. Awad, R.K. Nagarale, S.G.
and food packaging etc. Advantageously, it is quite possible to scale Kumbar, Polym. Adv. Technol. 25 (2014) 507–515.
up the electrospinning process for mass production of nanofibers [41] B. Sahoo, P.K. Panda, Ceram. Int. 38 (2012) 5189–5193.
to meet industrial level needs. Hence, the growth of E-spin tech- [42] L. Palangetic, Naveen Krishna Reddy, S. Srinivasan, Robert E. Cohen, G.H.
McKinley, C. Clasen, Polymer 55 (2014) 4920–4931.
nique in materials world by next 10 years will be like the phase
[43] Lin Mei, Minglei Mao, Shulei Chou, Huakun Liu, Shixue Dou, Dickon H. Ng,
achieved by chromatography technique currently in analytical Jianmin Ma, J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015) 21699–21705.
chemistry. Based on the significant aspects of electrospinning as [44] G. Yang, W. Chang, W. Yan, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 69 (2014) 473–479.
a technique and nanofibers as a class of advanced materials, it is [45] A. Yang, X. Tao, G.K.H. Pang, K.G.G. Siu, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 (2008) 257–262.
[46] Y. Zhang, X. Hea, J. Li, Z. Miao, F. Huang, Sens. Actuators, B 132 (2008) 67–73.
quite agreeable that their combination would lead to a ‘‘new tech- [47] Maryline Nasr, Roman Viter, Cynthia Eid, Roland Habchi, Philippe Miele,
nology for next generation applications in industries and Mikhael Bechelany, New J. Chem. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/
laboratories”. c6nj03088b.
[48] N. Dharmaraj, H.C. Park, B.M. Lee, P. Vishvanathamurthi, H.Y. Kim, D.R. Lee,
Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7 (2004) 431–433.
[49] Z. Wang, Z. Li, J. Sun, H. Zhang, W. Wang, W. Zheng, C. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C
Acknowledgements
114 (2010) 6100–6105.
[50] R. Ruiz-Rosas, J. Bedia, J.M. Rosas, M. Lallave, I.G. Loscertales, J. Rodríguez-
One of the authors Thenmozhi Sukumar (S.T) is thankful to Mirasol, T. Cordero, Catal. Today 187 (2011) 77–87.
[51] Lei Luo, Wenzheng Xu, Zhaokang Xia, Yaqian Fei, Jiadeng Zhu, Chen Chen, Lu
Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Ministry
Yao, Qufu Wei, Hui Qiao, Xiangwu Zhang, Ceram. Int. 42 (2016) 10826–
of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi, for the award of Junior 10832.
Research Fellowship (JRF). [52] Min Xi, Xiaoxu Wang, Yong Zhao, Zhengtao Zhu, Hao Fong, Appl. Phys. Lett.
104 (2014) 133102–133104.
[53] Z. Wang, Z. Li, L. Liu, X. Xu, H. Zhang, W. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.
References 93 (2009) 634–637.
[54] Z. Li, C. Wang, One Dimensional Nanostructures, Electrospinning Technique
and Unique Nanofibers, 2013, ISBN 978-3-642-36426-6.
[1] S. Ramakrishna, K. Fujikara, W.E. Teo, T.C. Lim, Zuwel. Ma, An Introduction to
[55] Q. Yang, Z. Li, Y. Hong, Y. Zhao, S. Qiu, C. Wang, Y. Wei, J. Polym. Sci. Part B:
Electrospinning and Nanofibers, World Scientific Publishing Pvt. Ltd., 2005.
Polym. Phys. 42 (2004) 3721–3726.
[2] D.I. Braghirolli, D. Steffens, P. Pranke, Drug Discovery Today 19 (2014) 743–
[56] C.J. Buchko, L.C. Chen, Yu Shen, D.C. Martin, Polymer 40 (1999) 7397–7407.
753.
[57] X. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Dong, J. Sheng, Polym. Int. 53 (2004) 1704–1710.
[3] N.L. Lala, R. Ramaseshan, L. Bojun, S. Sundarrajan, R.S. Boarhate, L. Ying-jun, S.
[58] C. Zhang, X. Yuan, L. Wu, Y. Han, J. Shang, Eur. Polym. J. 41 (2005) 423–432.
Ramakrishna, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97 (2007) 1357–1365.
[59] C.S. Ki, D.H. Back, K.D. Gang, K.H. Lee, I.C. Um, Y.H. Park, Polymer 46 (2005)
[4] Y. Yu, L. Gu, C. Zhu, P.A. Akan, J. Maier, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 15984.
5094–5102.
[5] M.M. Demir, M.A. Gulgun, Y.Z. Menceloglu, B. Erman, S.S. Abramchuk, E.E.
[60] Dan Li, Yuliang Wang, Younan Xia, Nano Lett. 3 (2003) 1167–1171.
Makhaeva, A.R. Khokhlov, V.G. Matveena, M.G. Sulman, Macromolecule 37
[61] C.H. Kim, Y.H. Jung, H.Y. Kim, D.R. Lee, N. Dharmaraj, K.E. Choi, Macromol. Res.
(2004) 1787.
14 (2006) 59–65.
[6] Y. Khang, I.S. Yoon, S.Y. Lee, D.D. Kim, S.J. Lee, W.H. Park, S.M. Hudson, J.
[62] C.L. Casper, J.S. Stephens, N.G. Tassi, D.B. Chase, J.F. Rabolt, Macromolecules
Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomatter. 92 (2010) 568.
37 (2004) 573–578.
[7] Omid Akhavan, J. Mater. Chem. B 4 (2016) 3169–3190.
[63] S.J. Lee, D.N. Heo, J. Moon, W. Ko, J.B. Lee, M.S. Bae, S.W. Park, J.E. Kim, D.H.
[8] Z. Zhang, X. Li, C. Wang, L. Wei, Y. Liu, C. Shao, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009)
Lee, E.C. Kim, C.H. Lee, I.K. Kwon, Carbohydr. Polym. 111 (2014)
19397.
530–537.
[9] D.G. Yu, L.D. Gao, K. White, C. Brandford-white, W.Y. Lu, L.M. Zhu, Pharm. Res.
[64] S. Calamak, E.A. Aksoy, C. Erdogdu, M. Sagıroglu, K. Ulubayram, J. Nanopart.
27 (2010) 2466.
Res. 17 (2015) 87.
[10] M. Chan, C. Wang, W. Fang, J. Wang, W. Zhang, G. Jin, G. Diao, Langmuir 29
[65] N.E. Mushi, N. Butchosa, M. Salajkova, Qi Zhou, L.A. Berglund, Carbohydr.
(2013) 11858.
Polym. 112 (2014) 255–263.
[11] P. Kampalanonwat, P. Supaphol, G.E. Monock, J. Chromatogr. A 1299 (2013)
[66] A.M. Abdelgawada, S.M. Hdsona, O.J. Rojasb, Carbohydr. Polym. 100 (2014)
110.
166–178.
[12] (a) US Pat., 692631, 1902.;
[67] A.R. Unnithan, G. Gnanasekaran, Y. Sathishkumar, Y.S. Lee, C.S. Kim,
(b) US Pat., 705691, 1902.
Carbohydr. Polym. 102 (2014) 884–892.
[13] J. Zeleny, J. Phys. Rev. 3 (1914) 69.
[68] G. Ma, D. Fang, Y. Liu, X. Zhu, J. Nie, Carbohydr. Polym. 87 (2012) 737–743.
[14] US Pat., 1975504A, 1934.
[69] M. Bao, X. Wang, H. Yuan, X. Lou, Q. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. B (2016),
[15] US Pat., 048651, 1936.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6tb01305h.
[16] US Pat., 2116942, 1938.
[70] P. Tonglairoum, T. Ngawhirunpat, T. Rojanarata, R. Kaomongkolgit, P.
[17] US Pat., 2160962, 1939.
Opanasopit, Colloids Surf., B 126 (2015) 18–25.
[18] US Pat., 2187306, 1940.
[71] B. Ardeshirzadeh, N.A. Anaraki, M. Irani, L.R. Rad, S. Shamshiri, Mater. Sci. Eng.
[19] C.J. Luo, S.D. Stoyanov, E. Stride, E. Pelanb, M. Edrisingle, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41
C (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. msec.2014.12.039.
(2012) 4708–4735.
[72] Xiao-Zhu Sun, Gareth R. Williams, Xiao-Xiao Hou, Li-Min Zhu, Carbohydr.
[20] Y. Filatov, A. Budyka, V. Kirichenko, J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 3 (2008) 36–39.
Polym. 94 (2013) 147–153.
[21] G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 280 (1964) 383–397.
[73] X. Fang, H. Ma, S. Xiao, M. Shen, R. Guo, X. Cao, X. Shi, J. Mater. Chem. 21
[22] P.K. Baumgarten, J. Colloid, Interface Sci. 36 (1971) 71–79.
(2011) 4493–4501.
[23] J. Dhoshi, D.H. Reneker, J. Electrostat. 35 (1995) 151–160.
[74] Y. Yang, W. Zhang, F. Yang, D.E. Brown, Y. Ren, S. Lee, D. Zeng, Q. Gao, X.
[24] D.H. Reneker, I. Chun, Nanotechnology 7 (1996) 216.
Zhang, Green Chem. 18 (2016) 3949–3955.
[25] H. Fong, D.H. Reneker, J. Polym. Sci. Pt. B-Polym. Phys. 37 (1999) 3488–3493.
[75] D. Hu, Y. Huang, H. Liu, H. Wang, S. Wang, M. Shen, M. Zhu, X. Shi, J. Mater.
[26] M. Bognitzki, W. Czado, T. Frese, A. Schaper, H. Wendorf, Adv. Mater. 13
Chem. A 2 (2014) 2323–2332.
(2001) 70–72.
[76] P.R. Likhar, R. Arundhathi, S. Ghosh, M.L. Kantam, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 302
[27] J.M. Daitzel, J. Kleinmeyer, D. Harris, N.C. Beck Tan, Polymer 42 (2001) 261–
(2009) 142–149.
272.
48 S. Thenmozhi et al. / Materials Science and Engineering B 217 (2017) 36–48
[77] Y. Huang, H. Ma, S. Wang, M. Shen, R. Guo, X. Cao, M. Zhu, X. Shi, Appl. Mater. [91] P. Kampalanonwat, P. Supaphol, G.E. Morlock, J. Chromatogr. A 1299 (2013)
Interfaces 4 (2012) 3054–3061. 110–117.
[78] S. Jayaraman, V. Aravindan, P. Suresh Kumar, W.C. Ling, S. Ramakrishna, S. [92] N. Naseri, C. Algan, V. Jacobs, M. John, K. Oksman, A.P. Mathew, Carbohydr.
Madhavi, Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2014) 8660–8666. Polym. 109 (2014) 7–15.
[79] R. Ramaseshan, S. Sundarrajan, Y. Liu, R.S. Barhate, N.L. Lala, S. Ramakrishna, [93] G. Yang, J. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Li, X. Guo, S. Zhou, ACS Nano 9 (2015) 1161–
Nanotechnology 17 (2006) 2947–2953. 1174.
[80] P. Zhang, X. Zhao, X. Zhang, Y. Lai, X. Wang, J. Li, G. Wei, Z. Su, Appl. Mater. [94] T. Arai, M. Tanaka, H. Kawakami, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4 (2012) 5453–
Interfaces 6 (2014) 7563–7571. 5457.
[81] S.-J. Kim, S.-J. Choi, J.S. Jang, N.-H. Kim, M. Hakim, H.L. Tuller, Il-D Kim, ACS [95] M. Gopiraman, H. Bang, G. Yuan, C. Yin, K. Song, J.S. Lee, I. Chung, R.
Nano 10 (2016) 5891–5899. Karvembu, I.S. Kim, Carbohydr. Polym. 132 (2015) 554–564.
[82] A. Mahapatra, B.G. Mishra, G. Hota, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 1554– [96] J.C. Kim, D.W. Kim, J. Chem. Asian 9 (2014) 3313–3318.
1561. [97] K. Vidhya, E. Gunasundari, R. Sheeja, New J. Chem. 40 (2016) 3268–3276.
[83] A.R. Keshtkar, M. Irani, M.A. Moosavian, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 295 (2013) [98] L. Persano, A. Camposeo, C. Tekmen, D. Pisignano, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 298
563–571. (2013) 504–520.
[84] G.T. Zhu, X. Chen, X.M. He, H. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Feng, Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) [99] C.J. Luo, Simeon D. Stoyanov, E. Stride, E. Pelan, M. Edirisinghe, Chem. Soc.
4450–4456. Rev. 41 (2012) 4708–4735.
[85] H. Najafabadi, M. Irani, L. Roshanfekr Rad, A.H. Haratameh, I. Haririan, RSC [100] D. Lukas, A. Sarkar, L. Martinova, K. Vodsedalkova, D. Lubasova, J. Chaloupek,
Adv. 5 (2015) 16532–16539. P. Pokorny, P. Mikes, J. Chvojka, M. Komrek, Text. Prog. 4 (2009) 59.
[86] P. Sullivan, J. Moate, B. Stone, J.D. Atkinson, Z. Hashisho, M.J. Rood, Adsorption [101] B.L. Arthur, J.W. Edwin, US Patent, 2772444, Du Pont, 1956.
18 (2012) 265–274. [102] US Pat., 7332050, 2008.
[87] M. Chen, C. Wang, W. Fang, J. Wang, W. Zhang, G. Jin, G. Diao, Langmuir 29 [103] http://fiberiotech.com/technology.
(2013) 11858–11867. [104] US Pat., Application number 20090042031.
[88] S. Haider, F.F. Binagag, A. Haider, W.A. Al-Masry, J. Polym. Res. 21 (2014) 371. [105] http://www.elmarco.cz/upload/soubory/obsah/63-2-nanofibers-metric-for-
[89] S. Patel, G. Hota, Fibers Polym. 15 (2014) 2272–2282. nanospidertm.pdf
[90] S.R. Dods, O. Hardick, B. Stevens, D.G. Bracewell, J. Chromatogr. A 1376 (2015) [106] S. Xu, C. Qin, M. Yu, R. Dong, X. Yan, H. Zhao, W. Han, H. Zhang, Y. Long,
74–83. Nanoscale 7 (2015) 12351.