Topic 7
Topic 7
Topic 7
Topic 7
Introduction
So, in first assignment I learned contributions of Robert Ian (Bob) Tricker and
George Adrian Hayhurst Cadbury to corporate governance. Adrian Cadbury and
Bob Tricker have both made important contributions to corporate governance, but
in different ways. Cadbury’s work focused on practical changes, aiming to solve
immediate issues and push for regulatory improvements. In contrast, Tricker
offered a more theoretical viewpoint, taking a global look at corporate governance
and adding depth to academic studies in the field. Their combined efforts bring
together two approaches to improving corporate governance. Cadbury’s most
significant contribution is the Cadbury Report (1992), which addressed critical
issues in corporate governance. In this report, Cadbury pay more attention and
makes a proposal to such sectors. They are Separation of roles, Board
Composition, Financial Reporting and Internal Control, Code of Best Practice,
Influences on Global Corporate Governance. Its recommendations led to
significant regulatory changes and improvements in governance structures,
enhancing transparency and accountability in companies.
One of Tricker’s seminal contributions is his book, “Corporate Governance:
Principles, Policies, and Practices” (1984). This work provided a comprehensive
framework for understanding corporate governance, detailing its principles,
policies, and practical applications. Tricker’s book became a cornerstone in
corporate governance literature, influencing both academic thought and practical
application. His work on agency theory explores the relationship between
principals (shareholders) and agents (managers), emphasizing the need for
mechanisms to align interests and reduce conflicts.
In the second topic, I analyzed Resource Dependency theory (RDT) and its
impact to the CG mainly external factors. RDT provides a framework for
understanding how organizations manage their external relationships and
dependencies on resources. It’s contributions Resource Acquisition, Legitimacy
and Reputation, Adaptation to Environmental Uncertainty, Financial Institutions
and Board Diversity etc. For example, RTD positive actions seems in Uzbekistan’s
Higher Education system especially after Sovet system (1991). There is a positive
and statistically significant relationship between the share of revenue from tuition
fees and the share of expenditure spent on teaching. It’s reflects the development
of using RDT theory in Uzbek Corporate model. So, by recognizing the
significance of resource dependencies and power dynamics, organizations can
enhance their governance practices and strategic decision-making processes.
Sixth assignment I did case analysis based on Volvo group. I analyzed its by-law,
corporate code, structure, stocks, dividend policy, and how company fits the
model. Volvo group – world’s large company, together with its subsidiaries,
manufactures and sells trucks, buses, construction equipment, and marine and
industrial engines in Europe, the United States, Asia, Africa, and Oceania.
Company has a robust corporate governance framework that support transparency
accountability, and adherence to ethical standards. They have key committees, such
as the Audit and Remuneration Committees, strengthens Volvo’s governance
framework, focusing on transparent financial reporting, fair executive
compensation, and effective risk management. Volvo’s Code of Conduct, which
emphasizes fair competition, ethical partnerships, and compliance. Company’s
organizational structure is matrix as it diversified more sectors. Volvo's dividend
yield of 2.05% and recent growth in dividend payouts demonstrate a solid financial
strategy. Company more focused on rewarding shareholders invests heavily in
innovation and sustainability. Volvo Group’s corporate governance system fits the
core principles of the Nordic model, balancing transparency, ethical practices, and
stakeholder engagement, alongside maintaining sustainable financial and
operational growth. Recommendations for Uzbek company’s. Volvo's commitment
to sustainability and innovation is a strong model. Uzbek companies can adopt
similar initiatives by investing in eco-friendly practices, renewable energy, and
advanced technologies. This focus on sustainability can improve public image and
long-term profitability. To support growth in various sectors, a matrix
organizational structure could help Uzbek companies streamline operations and
improve coordination across departments. This structure is flexible and promotes
innovation, enabling companies to respond quickly to market changes. Uzbek
companies can establish Audit and Remuneration Committees to ensure proper
financial reporting, fair executive compensation, and effective risk management.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I studied important ideas in corporate governance and different
models, especially the Nordic model. For Uzbekistan, it’s important to make
shareholder rights better, create required committees, and have independent board
members. Working with groups like the International Trade Centre can help local
businesses adjust to global trade. Uzbek companies can also learn from successful
businesses like Volvo Group by using eco-friendly practices and new ideas to
improve their governance and accountability. These changes can help build a
stronger and clearer corporate governance system in Uzbekistan.