Chapter 7 - Voidable Contracts

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

CHAPTER 7 - VOIDABLE CONTRACTS

VOIDABLE CONTRACTS IN GENERAL.-


Voidable contract may be defined as those in which all of the essential elements
for validity are present, although the element of consent is vitiated either by lack
of legal capacity of one of the contracting parties or by mistake, violence,
intimidation, undue influence, or fraud.
The most essential feature of a voidable contract is that it is binding until it is
annulled by a competent court.

CHARACTERISTICS.-
Voidable contracts possess the following characteristics:
1. Their defect consists in the vitiation of consent of one of the contracting
parties.
2. They are binding until they are annulled by a competent court.
3. They are susceptible of convalidation by ratification or by prescription.
4. Their defect or voidable character cannot be invoked by third persons.

ART. 1390.
The following contracts are voidable or annullable, even though there may have
been no damage to the contracting parties:
1. Those where one of the parties is incapable if giving consent to a contract;
2. Those where the consent is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation,
undue influence or fraud.
These contracts are binding, unless they are annulled by a proper action in court.
They are susceptible of ratification.

CONTRACTS WHICH IS VOIDABLE.-


It must be observed that in a voidable contract all of the essential requisites for
validity are present, although the requisite of consent is defective because one of
the contracting parties does not possess the necessary legal capacity, or because
it is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence or fraud.
It must also be observed that even though there may have been no damage to
the contracting parties, the contracts enumerated in ART. 1390 are still
voidable. Hence, whether a contract which law considers as voidable has
already been consummated or is merely executory is immaterial; it can always
be annulled by a proper action in court.

ART. 1391.
The action for annulment shall be brought within four
years. This period shall begin:
In cases of intimidation, violence or undue influence, from the time the defect of
the consent ceases.
In case of mistake or fraud, from the time of the discovery of the same.
And when the action refers to contracts entered into by minors or other
incapacitated persons, from the time the guardianship ceases.
PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD.-
According to ART. 1391, the action for annulment must be commenced within a
period of four years. If the action refers to contracts entered into by
incapacitated persons, the period shall be counted from the time the
guardianship ceases; it if refers to those where consent is vitiated by violence,
intimidation or undue influence ceases or disappears; and if it refers to
those where consent is vitiated by mistake or fraud, the period
shall be counted from the time of the discovery of such mistake
or fraud. If the action is not commenced within such period, the
right of the party entitled to institute the action shall prescribe.

ART. 1392.
Ratification extinguishes the action to annul a voidable contract.

ART. 1393.
Ratification may be effected expressly or tacitly. It is
understood that there is a tacit ratification if, with knowledge of
the reason which renders the contract voidable and such
reason having ceased, the person who has a right to invoke it
should execute an act which necessarily implies an intention to
waive his right.

ART. 1394.
Ratification may be effected by the guardian of the incapacitated
person

ART. 1395.
Ratification does not require the conformity of the contracting
party who has no right to bring the action for annulment.

ART. 1396.
Ratification cleanses the contract from all its defects from the
moment it was constituted

You might also like