Paper-1 Lubrication Engineering
Paper-1 Lubrication Engineering
Paper-1 Lubrication Engineering
UNIT-1
Fundamentals of Lubrication: Introduction to Lubrication Engineering-Friction and
Lubrication-Lubricant Properties-Viscosity and Viscosity Index-Lubricant
Additives
UNIT-2
Lubricants and their Applications: Mineral and Synthetic Lubricants-Greases and
their Applications-Solid and Dry Film Lubricants-Lubrication Systems and their
Design
UNIT-3
Lubricant Analysis and Maintenance: Oil Analysis Techniques-Wear Debris
Analysis-Condition Monitoring-Lubricant Management Practices
UNIT-4
Environmental and Economic Considerations: Environmental Impacts of
Lubricants-Sustainability and Energy Efficiency-Lubrication Cost Management-
Lubrication Strategies for Industry 4.0
UNIT-1
Fundamentals of Lubrication: Introduction to Lubrication Engineering
Lubrication is the process or technique of using a lubricant to
reduce friction and wear and tear in a contact between two surfaces. The study of
lubrication is a discipline in the field of tribology.
Lubrication mechanisms such as fluid-lubricated systems are designed so that
the applied load is partially or completely carried
by hydrodynamic or hydrostatic pressure, which reduces solid body interactions
(and consequently friction and wear). Depending on the degree of surface
separation, different lubrication regimes can be distinguished.
Adequate lubrication allows smooth, continuous operation of machine elements,
reduces the rate of wear, and prevents excessive stresses or seizures at bearings.
When lubrication breaks down, components can rub destructively against each
other, causing heat, local welding, destructive damage and failure.
Lubrication mechanisms
Fluid-lubricated systems
As the load increases on the contacting surfaces, distinct situations can be observed
with respect to the mode of lubrication, which are called lubrication regimes:[1]
Fluid film lubrication is the lubrication regime in which, through viscous
forces, the load is fully supported by the lubricant within the space or gap
between the parts in motion relative to one another object (the lubricated
conjunction) and solid–solid contact is avoided.
o In hydrostatic lubrication, external pressure is applied to the lubricant
in the bearing to maintain the fluid lubricant film where it would
otherwise be squeezed out.
o In hydrodynamic lubrication, the motion of the contacting surfaces, as
well as the design of the bearing, pump lubricant around the bearing
to maintain the lubricating film. This design of bearing may wear
when started, stopped or reversed, as the lubricant film breaks down.
The basis of the hydrodynamic theory of lubrication is the Reynolds
equation. The governing equations of the hydrodynamic theory of
lubrication and some analytical solutions can be found in the
reference.
Elastohydrodynamic lubrication: Mostly for nonconforming surfaces or
higher load conditions, the bodies suffer elastic strains at the contact. Such
strain creates a load-bearing area, which provides an almost parallel gap for
the fluid to flow through. Much as in hydrodynamic lubrication, the motion
of the contacting bodies generates a flow induced pressure, which acts as the
bearing force over the contact area. In such high pressure regimes, the
viscosity of the fluid may rise considerably. At full film elastohydrodynamic
lubrication, the generated lubricant film completely separates the surfaces.
Due to the strong coupling between lubricant hydrodynamic action and the
elastic deformation in contacting solids, this regime of lubrication is an
example of Fluid-structure interaction.The classical elastohydrodynamic
theory considers Reynolds equation and the elastic deflection equation to
solve for the pressure and deformation in this lubrication regime.[5][6] Contact
between raised solid features, or asperities, can also occur, leading to a
mixed-lubrication or boundary lubrication regime.
Boundary lubrication is defined as that regime in which the load is carried
by the surface asperities (high points) rather than by the lubricant.[7] This is
the effect that makes Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene "self-
lubricating".
Boundary film lubrication: The hydrodynamic effects are negligible. The
bodies come into closer contact at their asperities (high points); the heat
developed by the local pressures causes a condition which is called stick-
slip, and some asperities break off. At the elevated temperature and pressure
conditions, chemically reactive constituents of the lubricant react with the
contact surface, forming a highly resistant tenacious layer or film on the
moving solid surfaces (boundary film) which is capable of supporting the
load and major wear or breakdown is avoided.
Mixed lubrication: This regime is in between the full film
elastohydrodynamic and boundary lubrication regimes. The generated
lubricant film is not enough to separate the bodies completely, but
hydrodynamic effects are considerable.
Besides supporting the load the lubricant may have to perform other functions as
well, for instance it may cool the contact areas and remove wear products. While
carrying out these functions the lubricant is constantly replaced from the contact
areas either by the relative movement (hydrodynamics) or by externally induced
forces.
Lubrication is required for correct operation of mechanical systems such
as pistons, pumps, cams, bearings, turbines, gears, roller chains, cutting tools etc.
where without lubrication the pressure between the surfaces in close proximity
would generate enough heat for rapid surface damage which in a coarsened
condition may literally weld the surfaces together, causing seizure.
In some applications, such as piston engines, the film between the piston and the
cylinder wall also seals the combustion chamber, preventing combustion gases
from escaping into the crankcase.
If an engine required pressurised lubrication to, say, plain bearings, there would be
an oil pump and an oil filter. On early engines (such as a Sabb marine diesel),
where pressurised feed was not required splash lubrication would suffice.
Friction and Lubrication
Although this is a valid definition, it fails to realize all that lubrication actually
achieves.
Many different substances can be used to lubricate a surface. Oil and grease are the
most common. Grease is composed of oil and a thickening agent to obtain its
consistency, while the oil is what actually lubricates. Oils can be synthetic,
vegetable or mineral-based as well as a combination of these.
The application determines which oil, commonly referred to as the base oil, should
be used. In extreme conditions, synthetic oils can be beneficial. Where the
environment is of concern, vegetable base oils may be utilized.
Lubricants containing oil have additives that enhance, add or suppress properties
within the base oil. The amount of additives depends on the type of oil and the
application for which it will be used. For instance, engine oil might have a
dispersant added.
Reduce friction
Prevent wear
Protect the equipment from corrosion
Control temperature (dissipate heat)
Control contamination (carry contaminants to a filter or sump)
Transmit power (hydraulics)
Provide a fluid seal
Sometimes the functions of reducing friction and preventing wear are used
interchangeably. However, friction is the resistance to motion, and wear is the loss
of material as a result of friction, contact fatigue and corrosion. There is a
significant difference. In fact, not all that causes friction (e.g., fluid friction) causes
wear, and not all that causes wear (e.g., cavitational erosion) causes friction.
Reducing friction is a key objective of lubrication, but there are many other
benefits of this process. Lubricating films can help prevent corrosion by protecting
the surface from water and other corrosive substances. In addition, they play an
important role in controlling contamination within systems.
The lubricant works as a conduit in which it transports contaminants to filters to be
removed. These fluids also aid in temperature control by absorbing heat from
surfaces and transferring it to a point of lower temperature where it can be
dissipated.
Types of Lubrication
There are three different types of lubrication: boundary, mixed and full film. Each
type is different, but they all rely on a lubricant and the additives within the oils to
protect against wear.
Full-film lubrication can be broken down into two forms: hydrodynamic and
elastohydrodynamic. Hydrodynamic lubrication occurs when two surfaces in
sliding motion (relative to each other) are fully separated by a film of fluid.
These additives cling to metal surfaces and form a sacrificial layer that protects the
metal from wear. Boundary lubrication occurs when the two surfaces are
contacting in such a way that only the EP or AW layer is all that is protecting
them. This is not ideal, as it causes high friction, heat and other undesirable effects.
Lubricant Properties
Lubricants have a wide range of properties that impact their physical and chemical
properties. Knowing about these properties is important in determining which
lubricant is best for which situation. While there are many properties, the most
important are:
1. Viscosity: A lubricant’s “internal resistance to flow.” Higher viscosity
lubricants are thick and don’t flow, while lower viscosity lubricants have a closer
consistency to water and do flow. The image below demonstrates the viscosity of
four different oils. The ball sinks faster in the thinner, low viscosity oil while it
sinks slower in the higher viscosity blends.
There are two types of viscosity — dynamic viscosity and kinematic viscosity.
Dynamic viscosity, or absolute viscosity, is a measure of the internal resistance of
the fluid to motion. The (metric) units are g/(cm-s) or centipoise. Kinematic
viscosity is the ratio of dynamic viscosity to density:
where μ is the dynamic viscosity, ρ is the density of the fluid, and ν is the
kinematic viscosity.
Viscosity is measured by ASTM D 445 [1]. In the viscosity test, the fluid is placed
in a specially designed glassware tube (Figure 1) and allowed to equilibrate at the
desired temperature. After the sample is at temperature, it is pulled by suction to
the measurement section. The time that it takes to drain through a specific volume
is the viscosity. This time is dependent on the tube used (capillary size) and the
temperature. Temperature during measurement must be controlled very accurately,
generally to less than ± 0.1°C. Even minor differences in temperature, such as the
difference between 100°F (37.8°C) and 40°C (104°F) results in typically a 10
percent difference in viscosity.
In oil quenchants, changes in the viscosity can indicate oxidation, or the presence
of contamination with a lighter or heavier fluid. Confirmation tests with flashpoint
or other tests can confirm oxidation or contamination. Viscosity is used to
determine concentration of polymer quenchants. Viscosity is also important in
sizing pumps or heat exchangers. For instance, the viscosity of the fluid is
important in sizing pumps, to know how hard the pump will have to work to move
the fluid. It is much easier to move a thin fluid (low viscosity) than a thick fluid
(high viscosity).
Viscosity Index
In the case of lubrication, too high a viscosity could result in inadequate oil flow.
In the case of a car engine, this could mean oil starvation and dry start-ups. Close
tolerance engines (aircraft and high-performance cars) require that the oil is
circulating before the engine is started to prevent excessive wear. If the viscosity is
too low, then an inadequate film thickness would be present, resulting in greater
mechanical wear and friction [2].
For example, using the viscosity of a typical quench oil (Figure 1) and the tables of
ASTM D2270, the viscosity index can be calculated.
Figure 1: Typical tubes used for kinematic viscosity testing (Courtesy: Cannon
Instruments, State College, Pennsylvania).
Once the viscosity index (VI) is obtained, the viscosity of the fluid can be
determined over a wide range of temperatures. This is accomplished using ASTM
D341 [5]. Using special charts, the viscosity of the fluid is plotted at 40°C and
100°C. A straight-line is drawn between the two points. The viscosity at the
desired temperature can then be directly read. While this is very simple, the charts
are somewhat difficult to read. However, there are many on-line calculators
available that can do the job much quicker and more accurately [6]. The results
showing the calculated viscosities at different temperatures for the oil in Table 1
are shown in Figure 2.
Using the example of quench oil again, viscosity is used for determination of the
heat transfer coefficients used for sizing a heat exchanger. Using these charts, the
viscosity can be readily determined, and the proper sized heat exchanger can be
selected.
Lubricant Additives
Lubrication professionals often become very familiar with the base oil viscosity of
their lubricants. After all, viscosity is the most important property of a base oil.
Baselines for incoming oils are set and the health of the lubricant is monitored
based on viscosity alone. However, there is more to lubricants than just viscosity.
It’s crucial to understand the role of additives and their function(s) within the
lubricant.
Polar Additives
A sponge, a metal surface, dirt, water and wood pulp are all polar. Things that are
not polar include wax, Teflon, mineral base stock, a duck’s back and water
repellents.
It’s important to note that additives are also sacrificial. Once they are gone, they’re
gone. Think about the environment you work in, the products you produce and the
types of contaminants
that are around you daily. If you are allowing into your system contaminants that
additives are attracted to, such as dirt, silica and water, the additives will cling to
the contaminants and settle to the bottom or will be filtered out and deplete your
additive package.
Polar Mechanisms
There are a few polar mechanisms such as particle enveloping, water emulsifying
and metal wetting that are worthy of discussion.
Particle enveloping means that the additive will cling to the particle surface and
envelop it. These additives are metal deactivators, detergents and dispersants. They
are used to peptize (disperse) soot particles for the purpose of preventing
agglomeration, settling and deposits, especially at low to moderate temperatures.
You generally will see this in an engine. It offers a good reason to repair and
eliminate any issues as soon as they are detected through an appropriate oil
analysis test slate.
When using oil additives, more is not always better. As more additive is blended
into the oil, sometimes there isn’t any more benefit gained, and at times the
performance actually deteriorates. In other cases, the performance of the additive
doesn’t improve, but the duration of service does improve.
Some additives compete with each other for the same space on a metal surface. If a
high concentration of an anti-wear agent is added to the oil, the corrosion inhibitor
may become less effective. The result may be an increase in corrosion-related
problems.
Water emulsifying occurs when the additive polar head clings to a micro-droplet
of moisture. These types of additives are emulsifying agents. Consider this the next
time you observe water in a reservoir.
While it is important to remove the water, determine where the water entered the
system and repair it using a root-cause maintenance approach, you must also keep
in mind that the additive package has been affected. In lubrication terms, this is
known as additive depletion. A proper oil analysis report can determine the health
of the additives remaining in the lubricant.
Metal wetting is when additives anchor to metal surfaces, which is what they are
supposed to do. They attach to the interior of the gear casing, gear teeth, bearings,
shafts, etc.
Additives that perform this function are rust inhibitors, anti-wear (AW) and EP
additives, oiliness agents and corrosion inhibitors.
AW additives work specifically to protect metal surfaces during boundary
conditions. They form a ductile, ash-like film at moderate to high contact
temperatures (150 to 230 degrees F).
Whether they are enhancing, suppressing or imparting new properties to the base
oil, additives play an important role in the lubrication of machinery. Remember,
when the additives are gone, they’re gone, so don’t forget to check your additive
package.
of lubrication professionals
monitor additive health as part
63% of their oil analysis program,
according to a recent poll at
machinerylubrication.com
There are many types of chemical additives mixed into base oils to enhance the
properties of the base oil, to suppress some undesirable properties of the base oil
and possibly to impart some new properties.
Additives typically make up about 0.1 to 30 percent of the finished lubricating oil,
depending upon the target application of the lubricant.
Lubricant additives are expensive chemicals, and creating the proper mix or
formulation of additives is a very complicated science. It is the choice of additives
that differentiates a turbine (R&O) oil from a hydraulic oil, a gear oil and an
engine oil.
Many lubricant additives are available, and they are selected for use based upon
their ability to perform their intended function. They are also chosen for their
ability to mix easily with the selected base oils, to be compatible with other
additives in the formulation and to be cost effective.
Some additives perform their function within the body of the oil (e.g., anti-
oxidants), while others do their work on the surface of the metal (e.g., anti-wear
additives and rust inhibitors).
Anti-oxidants
Oxidation is the general attack of the weakest components of the base oil by
oxygen in the air. It occurs at all temperatures all of the time but is accelerated at
higher temperatures and by the presence of water, wear metals and other
contaminants.
It ultimately causes acids (which produce corrosion) and sludge (which results in
surface deposits and viscosity to increase) to form. Oxidation inhibitors, as they
are also called, are used to extend the operating life of the oil.
They are sacrificial additives that are consumed while performing their duty of
delaying the onset of oxidation, thus protecting the base oil. They are present in
almost every lubricating oil and grease.
Some of these inhibitors are specific to protecting certain metals. Therefore, an oil
may contain several corrosion inhibitors. Again, they are common in almost every
oil and grease. Metal deactivators are another form of corrosion inhibitor.
Viscosity index improvers are very large polymer additives that partially prevent
the oil from thinning out (losing viscosity) as the temperature increases. These
additives are used extensively when blending multi-grade engine oils such as SAE
5W-30 or SAE 15W-40.
They are also responsible for better oil flow at low temperatures, resulting in
reduction in wear and improved fuel economy. In addition, VI improvers are used
to achieve high-VI hydraulic and gear oils for improved start-up and lubrication at
low temperatures.
Then, as the temperature rises, the additive (or octopus) expands or extends its
arms (making it larger) and prevents the oil from thinning out too much at high
temperatures.
VI improvers do have a couple of negative features. The additives are large (high
molecular weight) polymers, which makes them susceptible to being chopped or
cut up into small pieces by machine components (shearing forces). Gears are
notoriously hard on VI-improver additives.
It is thought that the VI-improver additive loses its shape or uniform orientation
and therefore loses some of its thickening ability.
The viscosity of the oil temporarily drops within the load zone and then rebounds
to its normal viscosity after it leaves the load zone. This characteristic actually
aids in the reduction of fuel consumption.
There are several different types of VI improvers (olefin copolymers are
common). High-quality VI improvers are less susceptible to permanent shear loss
than low-cost, low-quality VI improvers.
These additives are typically used to protect machine parts from wear and loss of
metal during boundary lubrication conditions. They are polar additives that attach
to frictional metal surfaces.
They react chemically with the metal surfaces when metal-to-metal contact occurs
in conditions of mixed and boundary lubrication.
They are activated by the heat of contact to form a film that minimizes wear. They
also help protect the base oil from oxidation and the metal from damage by
corrosive acids.
These additives become “used up” by performing their function, after which
adhesive wear damage will increase. They are typically phosphorus compounds,
with the most common being zinc dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDDP).
There are different versions of ZDDP — some intended for hydraulic applications
and others for the higher temperatures encountered in engine oils. ZDDP also has
some anti-oxidant and corrosion-inhibition properties. In addition, other types of
phosphorous-based chemicals are used for anti-wear protection (e.g., TCP).
These additives are more chemically aggressive than AW additives. They react
chemically with metal (iron) surfaces to form a sacrificial surface film that
prevents the welding and seizure of opposing asperities caused by metal-to-metal
contact (adhesive wear).
They are activated at high loads and by the high contact temperatures that are
created. They are typically used in gear oils and give those oils that unique, strong
sulphur smell. These additives usually contain sulphur and phosphorus compounds
(and occasionally boron compounds).
They can be corrosive toward yellow metals, especially at higher temperatures, and
therefore should not be used in worm gear and similar applications where copper-
based metals are used. Some chlorine-based EP additives exist but are rarely used
due to corrosion concerns.
Anti-wear additives and extreme pressure agents form a large group of chemical
additives that carry out their function of protecting metal surfaces during boundary
lubrication by forming a protective film or barrier on the wear surfaces.
Detergents perform two functions. They help to keep hot metal components free
of deposits (clean) and neutralize acids that form in the oil. Detergents are
primarily used in engine oils and are alkaline or basic in nature.
They form the basis of the reserve alkalinity of engine oils, which is referred to as
the base number (BN). They are typically materials of calcium and magnesium
chemistry. Barium-based detergents were used in the past but are rarely used now.
Since these metal compounds leave an ash deposit when the oil is burned, they
may cause unwanted residue to form in high-temperature applications. Due to this
ash concern, many OEMs are specifying low-ash oils for equipment operating at
high temperatures. A detergent additive is normally used in conjunction with a
dispersant additive.
Dispersants
Dispersants are mainly found in engine oil with detergents to help keep engines
clean and free of deposits. The main function of dispersants is to keep particles of
diesel engine soot finely dispersed or suspended in the oil (less than 1 micron in
size). The objective is to keep the contaminant suspended and not allow it to
agglomerate in the oil so that it will minimize damage and can be carried out of the
engine during an oil change. Dispersants are generally organic and ashless. As
such, they are not easily detectable with conventional oil analysis.
Anti-foaming Agents
The chemicals in this additive group possess low interfacial tension, which
weakens the oil bubble wall and allows the foam bubbles to burst more
readily. They have an indirect effect on oxidation by reducing the amount of air-
oil contact.
Some of these additives are oil-insoluble silicone materials that are not dissolved
but rather dispersed finely in the lubricating oil. Very low concentrations are
usually required. If too much anti-foaming additive is added, it can have a reverse
effect and promote further foaming and air entrainment.
Friction Modifiers
Friction modifiers are typically used in engine oils and automatic transmission
fluids to alter the friction between engine and transmission components. In
engines, the emphasis is on lowering friction to improve fuel economy.
The pour point of an oil is approximately the lowest temperature at which an oil
will remain fluid. Wax crystals that form in paraffinic mineral oils crystallize
(become solid) at low temperatures. The solid crystals form a lattice network that
inhibits the remaining liquid oil from flowing.
The additives in this group reduce the size of the wax crystals in the oil and their
interaction with each other, allowing the oil to continue to flow at low
temperatures.
Demulsifiers
Biocides
Tackifiers
Tackifiers are stringy materials used in some oils and greases to prevent the
lubricant from flinging off the metal surface during rotational movement.
To be acceptable to blenders and end users alike, the additives must be capable of
being handled in conventional blending equipment, stable in storage, free of
offensive odor and be non-toxic by normal industrial standards.
Since many are highly viscous materials, they are generally sold to the oil
formulator as concentrated solutions in a base oil carrier.
Increasing the percentage of a certain additive may improve one property of an oil
while at the same time degrade another. When the specified concentrations of
additives become unbalanced, overall oil quality can be affected.
Some additives compete with each other for the same space on a metal surface. If
a high concentration of an anti-wear agent is added to the oil, the corrosion
inhibitor may become less effective. The result may be an increase in corrosion-
related problems.
It is very important to understand that most of these additives get consumed and
depleted by:
1. “decomposition” or breakdown,
2. “adsorption” onto metal, particle and water surfaces, and
3. “separation” due to settling or filtration.
For many additives, the longer the oil remains in service, the less effective the
remaining additive package is in protecting the equipment.
When the additive package weakens, viscosity increases, sludge begins to form,
corrosive acids start to attack bearings and metal surfaces, and/or wear begins to
increase. If oils of low quality are used, the point at which these problems begin
will occur much sooner.
It is for these reasons that top-quality lubricants meeting the correct industry
specifications (e.g., API engine service classifications) should always be
selected. The following table can be used as a guide for a more thorough
understanding of additive types and their functions in engine oil formulations.
UNIT-2
Lubricants and their Applications: Mineral and Synthetic Lubricants
Mineral-based oil is simply a heavily refined version of oil sourced from the
ground, semi-synthetic oil is a similar substance but with artificial additives while
purely synthetic is essentially man-made and designed oil.
They are also known respectively as conventional (regular), synthetic blended and
synthetic respectively.
Synthetic oils were developed during World War II by German scientists for use
on the Russian Front, where they maintained their fluidity in sub-zero
temperatures, but were not widely used in cars until the 1970s.
Oil technology has evolved with engine development and in response to evolving
internal design stresses such as minimized internal engine clearances, increased
combustion pressures and increasing emissions requirements.
As such, modern vehicles generally require either type of synthetic oil, with the
added expense of fully-synthetic oil recommended for more complex and powerful
engines.
Mineral oils are still used by operators of classic and vintage cars, partly because
the decreased viscosity (how thick or thin the oil is at a certain temperature) of
synthetic oils increases the likelihood of leaks in older engines.
One thing mineral and synthetic oils have in common is shelf life: both can be sold
for up to five years after being correctly packaged.
This is not to be confused with the service life of oil, which is from when it is
added to an engine and is influenced by engine wear debris, water, mileage and
time.
Dry Sump Lubricating System: a dry-sump system has an oil reservoir that is not
located at the bottom of the engine. It uses two oil pumps to keep the oil circulating
within the engine. The system is more complex and expensive to design. However,
there’s more flexibility to the design of the pan as it’s located in an unusual place.
It is often found in performance engines.
Lubricating System in Two-stroke and Four-stroke engines
The working of two-stroke and four-stroke engines are quite different the same as
their lubrication system. These internal combustion engines produce mechanical
power from chemical energy contained in hydrocarbon fuels. The working of these
engine’s components requires lubrication to minimize wear and tear so as for
engine effectiveness.
The major difference between the engines is that two-stroke engines have a power
stroke or expansion in each cylinder during each revolution of the crankshaft. The
exhaust and the intake process occur simultaneously as the piston moves through
its lowest. While
A four-stroke engine requires two complete turns of the crankshaft to make a
power stroke. burnt gases are firstly displaced by the piston during an upward
stroke. Fresh charge enters the cylinder during the next downward stroke.
Lubrication in Four-stroke Engine
In the lubrication of four-stroke engines, oil is stored in an oil sump or pan. The oil
circulates within the engine through splash lubrication or pressurize lubrication
pump system which is the most preferable choice by manufacturers. Although the
two can be featured together in an engine.
The splash lubrication happens when the crankshaft is partly immersed in an oil
sump. The momentum of the rotating crankshaft splashes oil to other components
in the engine such as the cam lobes, cylinder walls, wrist pin etc.
Pressurized lubrication is achieved using oil pump to push the film of lubricant
between moving parts such as the main bearings, rod bearings and cam bearings. It
also pumps oil to the engine’s valve guides and rocker arms.
Two-stroke Engine Lubrication
Generally, two-stroke engines tend to wear more quickly as there is no lubrication
source in them. but there is a high-quality oil that significantly reduces engine
wear.
Two-stroke engines receive oil beneath the crankshaft using a total-loss lubrication
system. This lubricating system combines both oil and fuel to provide both
energies for engine lubrication.
The two agents are combined in the cylinder’s intake tract and lubricate
components such as crankshaft, connecting rod and cylinder walls.
Two-stroke designed with oil injection injects oil directly into the engine where it
mixes with the fuel. In a premix two-stroke engine, oil-fuel is mixed before
pouring it into the fuel tank.
UNIT-3
Lubricant Analysis and Maintenance: Oil Analysis Techniques
An obvious reason to perform oil analysis is to understand the condition of the oil,
but it is also intended to help bring to light the condition of the machine from
which the oil sample was taken. There are three main categories of oil analysis:
fluid properties, contamination and wear debris.
Fluid Properties
This type of oil analysis focuses on identifying the oil’s current physical and
chemical state as well as on defining its remaining useful life (RUL). It answers
questions such as:
Does the sample match the specified oil identification?
Is it the correct oil to use?
Are the right additives active?
Have additives depleted?
Has the viscosity shifted from the expected viscosity? If so, why?
What is the oil’s RUL?
Contamination
By detecting the presence of destructive contaminants and narrowing down their
probable sources (internal or external), oil analysis can help answer questions such
as:
Is the oil clean?
What types of contaminants are in the oil?
Where are contaminants originating?
Are there signs of other types of lubricants?
Is there any sign of internal leakage?
Wear Debris
This form of oil analysis is about determining the presence and identification of
particles produced as a result of mechanical wear, corrosion or other machine
surface degradation. It answers questions relating to wear, including:
Is the machine degrading abnormally?
Is wear debris produced?
From which internal component is the wear likely originating?
What is the wear mode and cause?
How severe is the wear condition?
You need to know if any actions should be taken to keep the machine healthy and
to extend the life of the oil. Oil analysis for machines can be compared to blood
analysis for the human body. When a doctor pulls a blood sample, he puts it
through a lineup of analysis machines, studies the results and reports his
conclusions based on his education, research and detailed questions asked to the
patient.
Likewise, with oil analysis, careful oil samples are taken, and elaborate machines
yield the test results. Laboratory personnel interpret the data to the best of their
ability, but without crucial details about the machine, a diagnosis or prognosis can
be inaccurate. Some of these important details include:
The machine’s environmental conditions (extreme temperatures, high
humidity, high vibration, etc.)
The originating component (steam turbine, pump, etc.), make, model and oil
type currently in use
The permanent component ID and exact sample port location
Proper sampling procedures to confirm a consistently representative sample
Occurrences of oil changes or makeup oil added, as well as the quantity of
makeup oil since the last oil change
Whether filter carts have been in use between oil samples
Total operating time on the sampled component since it was purchased or
overhauled
Total runtime on the oil since the last change
Any other unusual or noteworthy activity involving the machine that could
influence changes to the lubricant
Interpreting an oil analysis report can be overwhelming to the untrained eye. Oil
analysis isn’t cheap, and neither is the equipment on which it reveals information.
Every year, industrial plants pay millions of dollars for commercial laboratories to
perform analysis on used and new oil samples. Unfortunately, a majority of the
plant personnel who receive these lab reports do not understand the basics of how
to interpret them.
What to Look for When Reviewing an Oil Analysis Report
1. Read and check the data on the oil type and machine type for accuracy.
2. Verify that reference data is shown for new oil conditions and that trend data
is at an understood frequency (preferably consistent).
3. Check the measured viscosity.
4. Verify elemental wear data and compare to reference and trended data. Use a
wear debris atlas to match elements to their possible source.
5. Check the elemental additive data and compare to reference and trended
data. Use a wear debris atlas to match elements to their possible source.
6. Verify elemental contamination data along with particle counts and compare
with reference and trended data. Use a wear debris atlas to match elements
to their possible source.
7. Check moisture/water levels and compare to reference and trended data.
8. Verify the acid number and base number and compare to reference and
trended data.
9. Check other analyzed data such as FTIR oxidation levels, flash point,
demulsibility, analytical ferrography, etc.
10.Compare any groups of data that are trending toward unacceptable levels
and make justifications based on these trends.
11.Compare written results and recommendations with known information on
the oil and machine, such as recent changes in environmental or operational
conditions or recent oil changes/filtration.
12.Review alarm limits and make adjustments based on the new information.
Typically, an oil analysis report comes with a written summary section that
attempts to put the results and recommendations in layman’s terms. But, since the
laboratory has never seen the machine or know its full history, these recommended
actions are generic and not tailored to your individual circumstances. Therefore, it
is the responsibility of the plant personnel who receive the lab report to take the
proper action based on all known facts about the machine, the environment and
recent lubrication tasks performed.
Oil Analysis Tests
For a standard piece of equipment undergoing the normal recommended oil
analysis, the test slate would consist of “routine” tests. If more testing is needed to
answer advanced questions, these would be considered “exception” tests.
Routine tests vary based on the originating component and environmental
conditions but should almost always include tests for viscosity, elemental
(spectrometric) analysis, moisture levels, particle counts, Fourier transform
infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and acid number. Other tests that are based on the
originating equipment include analytical ferrography, ferrous density, demulsibility
and base number testing.
The table on the left shows how tests are used in each of the three main oil analysis
categories.
Viscosity
Several methods are used to measure viscosity, which is reported in terms of
kinematic or absolute viscosity. While most industrial lubricants classify viscosity
in terms of ISO standardized viscosity grades (ISO 3448), this does not imply that
all lubricants with an ISO VG 320, for example, are exactly 320 centistokes (cSt).
According to the ISO standard, each lubricant is considered to be a particular
viscosity grade as long as it falls within 10 percent of the viscosity midpoint
(typically that of the ISO VG number).
of lubrication professionals
would not understand how to
interpret an oil analysis report
32%
from a commercial laboratory,
based on a recent poll at
MachineryLubrication.com
Condition Monitoring
Condition monitoring (CM) is a maintenance approach that predicts machine
health and safety through the combination of machine sensor data that measures
vibration and other parameters (in real-time) with state-of-the-art machine
monitoring software. This approach enables plant maintenance technicians
to remotely monitor the health of each individual piece of machinery and also
offers a holistic, plant-wide view of mechanical operations. Condition monitoring
software sends an alert whenever a change is detected in machine health, enabling
your maintenance technicians to immediately assess the situation and determine if
corrective action is required.
Benefits of condition monitoring
The proactive nature of condition monitoring is an innovative step forward on
several levels for some manufacturers. First, plant personnel are safer and thus,
we are all collectively safer. Second, plant managers can prevent unplanned
downtime due to machine failure while simultaneously making the most of
planned maintenance downtime by servicing multiple machines and addressing
all known problems at the same time. Further, condition monitoring also
eliminates unnecessary—and wasted—costs associated with over maintaining
healthy machines based on the static metric of operating hours alone.
Although condition monitoring is a tried and true industrial maintenance tool, it is
only just beginning to be leveraged effectively in a wider array of manufacturing
industries. Today’s condition monitoring systems can do much more for us—
financially, operationally, and most importantly, from a safety perspective.
Today’s condition monitoring solutions are highly reliable and have been proven
extremely effective across multiple manufacturing industries. Thus, for
manufacturers who adopt condition based maintenance techniques, the risk is
low and the reward is high.
For more than 60 years, we’ve been supplying condition monitoring solutions to
machinery-intensive industries. Customers turn to us for a simple reason: lasting
value. Our solutions demonstrate their worth, day in and day out. We combine
the highest quality products and responsive customer support with a service
team that takes the time to understand the uniqueness of your plant, your
personnel, and your goals. Our products can be found in many manufacturing, food
& beverage, municipalities, steel, mining, power, and oil & gas plants around the
world.
Lubricant Management Practices
Many people define a lubrication survey as a complete list of all oil and grease
lubricated equipment with an appropriate product recommendation listed next to
each component. While there can be no doubt that making sure the right product is
selected for the right application is critical, there is so much more to good
lubrication than product selection.
In the past few years, there has been a growing trend in establishing lubrication
management programs, and these organizations have been reaping the rewards.
Assessing fluid storage
and handling is a vital
component of an effective
lubrication survey.
UNIT-4
Environmental and Economic Considerations: Environmental Impacts of
Lubricants
As technology advances and there is a greater need to increase the energy
efficiency of machines, there is also a need for improved lubricants. Typically,
lubricants have been made of oil and additives. in the case of grease, a
thickener would be added. However, traditionally used petroleum-based
lubricants are harmful to the environment. Lubricants with higher
biodegradability are sought after, as more organizations face increasing
pressure to be sustainable.
Why are Lubricants Needed?
Lubricants are vital for equipment functioning. They act as a microfilm layer
between moving parts, help to protect equipment, and reduce damage and
durability over time. Lubricating oil reduces friction, overheating, scuffing,
rubbing, and corrosion due to its special properties. It is made up of a blend of base
oil (over 85%) and additives which improve the overall quality of the substance.
Lubricating oils containing refined additives of petroleum origin have been used in
outdoor machinery such as saws usually operated outdoors in forestry, where the
equipment is in close contact with outdoor greenery. They are also used in
agriculture for harvesters, earth-moving equipment, and more.
Oil’s Environmental Problem
When operating, the oil is directly emitted into the surroundings, causing negative
impacts on the environment and human health. It has been reported that over 10
million tons of mineral lubricants and hydraulic fluids pollute the environment
each year. In Europe, various industries consume an average of 5 million tons of
lubricant, of which 40% directly pollutes the natural environment.
Demand for More Sustainable Oils
Biodegradable oils have increased in popularity in recent years, but even these oils
can have up to 50% of a petroleum oil base. Critics have called to reduce the
petroleum component further to lessen toxicity and harmful effects.
Health outlining the impact of petroleum oil lubricants on soils, groundwater,
vegetation, wildlife, and human health. Their review suggested that lubricating oils
should only contain biodegradable ingredients to avoid negative impacts on the
environment. Complete biodegradability should be confirmed through testing.
Therefore, widespread control procedures and studies are needed.
Sustainable Alternatives to Lubricants
In some ways, the lubricants industry has long been intertwined with the petroleum
business, tainted with a similarly environmentally damaging reputation. There are
now more alternatives to petroleum oil, with a range of natural or synthetic base
oils available.
Additives provide extra benefits such as friction reduction, corrosion, and
temperature control. Advanced production technologies offer more sustainable
solutions by using eco-friendly refining additives as an alternative to petroleum-
based products.
When formulated from advanced biobased materials, lubricants can become even
more environmentally friendly, being biodegradable, low toxicity, and less likely
to bioaccumulate (where substances gradually accumulate).
The sustainable options are also known as Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants
- a term popularized in the global marine market by the Vickers Oil company who
has offered these products since 2002. These substances are often made from low
molecular weight polyalphaolefin, polyalkylene glycol, synthetic esters, and
vegetable oils. Reportedly, ester-based oils are the most common environmentally
accepted lubricant in the market, due to their non-toxicity and effective
biodegradation.
The Economy of Sustainable Oils
Crude oil is a well-known non-renewable natural resource, sourced from petroleum
oil which took millions of years to form in the ground. By contrast, renewable
products are typically grown, harvested, and turned into products within a
relatively short time.
Most oils taken directly from animal and vegetable sources do not yield stable
lubricants. It is this instability that makes them highly biodegradable, an
environmental advantage, but has not been an economic advantage. Renewable oils
such as these have been made and improved since the 1980s through genetic
modifications and chemical processing. Some were made from vegetable oils but
oxidized quickly and were more expensive, making them less economically viable
for mass consumerism.
Lubricating oils with a base oil and vegetable-based additives appeared on the
market in Europe in the mid-80s. These products have high biodegradability
compared to other types of base oils, with biodegradability levels ranging from 70-
100%, which are now commonly used in European forestry.
The Future of Eco-Friendly Lubricants
There is still a growing need for more efficient, sustainable lubricants to be
brought to market, particularly as governments are putting more pressure on
companies to use these greener lubricants.
There are expectations for these high-performance substances to be efficient and
less environmentally damaging when emitted into the surrounding environment.
Many regulators are more concerned about lubricants being environmentally
friendly than optimal in performance as companies pursue greener goals. The
growing interest in the impact of lubricating oils on the environment and health
motivates research centers and industries to innovate for fully biodegradable,
lubricating oils made up of natural ingredients.
Sustainability and Energy Efficiency
Energy efficiency is defined as using less energy to provide the same product or
service, such as lighting, heating and transportation. Together with the move to
renewable energy sources, increasing energy efficiency is considered to be one of
the twin pillars of sustainable energy policy.
As energy efficiency is a cheap and abundant resource, possessed by all countries,
rich and poor alike, it is key to ensuring a safe and reliable reduction in energy
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, energy efficiency
improvements are by far the quickest and least costly solution to the climate crisis.
Energy-efficiency experts worldwide have identified several areas where the
greatest savings in the use of energy can be made, including industry, transport,
homes and buildings, and recycling.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has stated that improved energy efficiency
in industrial processes, transportation, and buildings could lead to a 30% reduction
in the world’s energy needs by 2050 and help control global emissions of
greenhouse gases.
Energy Efficiency in Industry
The global energy intensity of industry – measured as the amount of primary
energy demand needed to produce one unit of gross domestic product (GDP) – fell
by nearly 20% between 2000 and 2016, primarily as a result of energy efficiency
policies. The size of these reductions is similar both in the 29 member countries of
the IEA and in major emerging economies. Out of the hundreds of opportunities
for substantial savings specific to large industries that have been identified by
energy-efficiency experts, four are frequently mentioned as being among the most
valuable: more efficient motors, capturing and recycling wasted thermal energy,
steel production, and fluid handling.
Inefficient electric motors are found throughout the global industrial sector.
Enormous savings for industry can be made by replacing older inefficient electric
motors with far more efficient modern motors, producing savings that exceed the
purchase price after just a few weeks of usage, even when the cost of lost
production time while replacing the motors is taken into account. These newer
industrial motors are almost always easier to operate, quieter and more reliable.
The steel industry has saved huge amounts of energy and drastically reduced CO2
emissions through advances known as “thin-slab casting” and “direct casting”.
Traditionally, steel mills have heated steel twice; first, to melt the metals into thick
cast sheets, and then a second time in order to recast the steel into the particular
form desired. The new, more efficient process involves directly casting the steel
from its liquid state into the final form desired, with the added bonus of producing
both a lighter and stronger steel than with the older process, as well as being 20
percent cheaper to produce.
Further savings for industries such as paper milling have been achieved through
the use of more efficient fluid handling. By redesigning piping systems to optimize
fluid flow, and by replacing older, oversized and inefficient pumps with more
efficient, modern pumps, many companies have reduced maintenance and
production costs, made huge energy savings, increased productivity, and achieved
greater reliability and product quality.
Large amounts of heat are produced by most industrial facilities and this wasted
thermal energy can be profitably captured and reused, or sold for heating and
cooling nearby buildings. CHP (combined heat and power) systems, also known as
cogeneration systems, use the thermal energy produced during electricity
production to turn turbines to produce more electricity, effectively using fuel twice
and significantly and profitably increasing efficiency in a short period of time.
Studies carried out in the U.S. have shown that fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions
could be reduced by 20 percent if all wasted thermal energy from factories were to
be captured and recycled.
Many European cities use district heating and cooling systems, where hot water
generated at a single point of supply is piped under the streets and into heat
exchangers and absorption chillers for heating and cooling nearby buildings,
including large institutions such as universities and hospitals. Finland is one of the
world leaders in the use of CHP and district heating and cooling systems.
According to the International Energy Agency’s CHP/DHC Collaborative, CHP
produces 74% of Finland’s district heating. The system has generated so much
electricity that the surplus is sold to other countries in Scandinavia.
The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that lighting
accounted for approximately 7% of total U.S. electricity consumption in 2017. The
potential savings from the use of new LED lightbulbs to replace older,
incandescent bulbs are truly astounding, not only for homeowners and businesses,
but also for towns and cities through the use of more efficient street lighting.
Switching to LED lighting can yield energy savings of over 75%. By 2022, 90% of
indoor lighting worldwide is expected to be provided by compact fluorescent
lamps (CFLs) and LEDs. In addition, intelligent use of motion sensors to detect
when people are present can also be used to achieve further savings and reductions
in emissions.
Efficient Homes and Buildings
“Every day,” says Bernie Sanders, “we are paying more for energy than we should
due to poor insulation, inefficient lights, appliances, and heating and cooling
equipment – money we could save by investing in energy efficiency.”
The use of LED lightbulbs in homes and buildings is only one of many ways for
reducing energy costs and CO2 emissions, and achieving substantial reductions in
electricity bills. Modern appliances such as washing machines, refrigerators and
water heaters are much more efficient and cheaper to run than older models, and by
replacing old windows, installing better insulation, and using solar water heaters,
savings are so great that initial investments for upgrades typically pay for
themselves through saved energy bills in just a few years. Wasted heat from water
heaters can be further reduced through the use of timers and insulation.
Efficient Transportation
Transport was responsible for 28% of global final energy consumption in 2016 and
is one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gas emissions, with road-based modes
of transport such as trucks, buses and cars emitting the most greenhouse gases. The
use of modern computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing
(CAD/CAM) methods, together with the employment of new lightweight
materials, mandated improvements in mileage efficiency, improved engine
technologies, hybrid cars, and plug-in electric vehicles have already produced
gains in savings and reductions in emissions. Global sales of electric vehicles grew
by 40% in 2016, mainly in China and Europe, and there are now more than 2
million electric vehicles worldwide, but this still represents less than 0.2% of the
1.2 billion light-duty vehicles (LDVs) on the road. Electric vehicles are much more
efficient than diesel or gasoline alternatives but are not yet at a scale to have a
significant influence on global LDV fuel economy. Moreover, sales of less
efficient large passenger vehicles such as trucks and SUVs have increased,
especially in the U.S., due to falling gasoline prices, leading to a reduction in the
global rate of improvement in fuel efficiency.
Mass transit systems such as bus and light rail networks in urban areas, along with
complementary walking and cycling infrastructures, can sharply reduce both CO2
emissions and energy used, and also improve air quality with subsequent health
benefits for local inhabitants.
According to the World Health Organization, “Safe, equitable, and energy-efficient
urban transport can help achieve multiple health and sustainability goals. Shifting
urban design and infrastructure investments into public transport networks that
prioritize rapid bus transit or light rail over private vehicles can reduce the long-
term trajectory of both air pollution and climate emissions generated by private
transport – and improve health equity by providing those lacking cars with better
mobility.”
A number of companies in the aviation industry have developed much lighter and
stronger materials which, together with more efficient fuel use and aircraft design,
have achieved gains in energy efficiency. Yet, despite these advances, the
environmental impact of aviation continues to be of great concern. Lower fares and
the consequent growth in the number of air passengers, along with the lack of taxes
on aviation fuel worldwide mean that CO2 emissions from air travel and air freight
are such that, unless market constraints are implemented, this growth will result in
aviation emissions amounting to almost all of the annual global CO2 emissions
budget by the year 2050.
Recycling
The recycling of commonly used materials such as paper, glass, plastics and
aluminum is another area which results in huge reductions in energy use and CO2
emissions. According to Stanford University, in the U.S. alone, “the amount of lost
energy from throwing away recyclable commodities such as aluminum cans and
newspapers is equivalent to the annual output of 15 power plants.”
Aluminum is the most efficient of recyclable materials. It never degrades and can
be reused indefinitely with no need to bring new materials into the production
cycle. Processing recycled aluminum would reduce the energy used in the
production of the metal from bauxite ore, currently one of the most energy-
intensive processes in the global economy, by an incredible 95 percent. In other
words, with the amount of energy it takes to make one new, unused aluminum can,
you could make 20 recycled cans.
However, according to the Container Recycling Institute, sales of canned and
bottled beverages in the U.S. have continued to grow over the last few decades but
recycling of the containers has stagnated, resulting in higher rates of landfilling,
incineration, littering and other negative environmental impacts.
Glass can be recycled indefinitely. The energy savings from recycling glass are
relatively small, as recycled glass still needs to be re-melted at very high
temperatures in order to make new glass products. However, according to a report
by the Environmental Protection Agency, creating glass from recycled materials
rather than raw materials generates 20 percent less air pollution and 50 percent less
water pollution, as well as helping to reduce the size of landfills, preserve natural
resources like sand, soda ash and limestone, and eliminate the costs involved with
transporting these heavy materials. Recycled glass can also be turned into
fiberglass, which in turn can be used in house insulation, and in the manufacture of
bricks. Less energy is therefore required to create the bricks and, as the product is
lighter, less energy is used in transport.
Paper is one of the most recycled materials in the world. Manufacturing recycled
paper saves thousands of trees each year in the U.S. alone and uses only 60 percent
of the energy required to produce paper from fresh pulp. Emerging research on
biodegradable inks and even erasable paper could soon solve the problems faced
by manufacturers of producing high quality, bright white paper due to ink residue.
.
Every year, more than 100 million tons of plastics are manufactured across the
globe, yet only 14% of this amount is recycled. 8 million tons of plastic end up in
our seas and oceans each year and some plastic materials can take hundreds of
years to break down in a landfill. However, many plastics can be recycled and
turned into items such as clothes, containers, bags, carpets, bottles, lumber, garden
products, car components, furniture and insulation, to name just a few. Recycling a
single plastic bottle can conserve enough energy to light a 10W LED bulb for up to
36 hours! It’s easy to see why recycling plastic is so important.
Barriers to Success
One of our main concerns has been to identify the financial and psychological
barriers that have kept individuals, businesses, and governments from realizing
efficiency’s great potential.
The main reason for home and business owners seems to be the initial expense.
Myopic behavior and the need for instant gratification mean that, despite being
informed that an initial outlay will be recovered through savings on bills, most
home and business owners would still prefer to spend their money on something
other than making their homes and businesses more energy efficient. A variety of
financing options are being made available in some countries, including the U.S.,
to make it easier for homeowners and businesses to invest in energy efficiency.
These include on-bill financing, property tax financing (also known as Property
Assessed Clean Energy or PACE bond financing), energy service performance
contracting (ESPC), and energy efficiency mortgages (EEMs). However, according
to the ACEEE (American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy), “Financing
programs for homeowners have typically drawn low participation rates and tend to
attract educated and motivated homeowners who are the least in need of financing
opportunities. Financing for those who are most in need – people with low or fixed
incomes and poor credit – has had low success.”
Other barriers include a lack of education over environmental issues, climate
change denial, greed and corruption on the part of construction and utility
companies and politicians, and fears that a concern for the environment will lead to
massive job loss, despite the evidence to the contrary. As the author Jeff Goodell
states, “In reality, studies show that investments to spur renewable energy and
boost energy efficiency generate far more jobs than oil and coal”.
The pathway to success in lubrication is not much different than any other
improvement program within the plant. You need to quantify your current
program. Whether your lubrication program is formal or informal, sophisticated or
simple, identifying where you are in contrast to where you want to be is the first
and most important step. This helps to identify the gaps. The biggest gaps, the gaps
that are going to give you the greatest return on investment, are the ones you need
to focus on.
Identifying the gaps allows you to design a program around the gaps you want to
focus on first. After designing the program, it's time to execute it and put it into
practice. You'll need to make sure everyone is educated to the point where they can
do their job effectively. Then, measuring successes and reevaluating gaps will help
to continuously improve.
Many studies have concluded, as has the following one, that, "While the cost of
purchasing lubricants typically amounts to less than one percent of a plant's
maintenance budget, the downstream effect of poor lubrication can amount to as
much as 30 percent of a plant's total maintenance costs." I hear the beginning of
this statement a lot and it's probably true for many. Management often feels there's
little or no opportunity to improve their lubrication program because they spend
relatively little on lubricants. As this example states, that's really not the case. The
total cost of your lubrication program is the sum of not just the lubricant or the
upfront costs, but the ongoing and downstream costs as well. The sum of all these
costs can be significant.
What we really need to do is convert what we know into a cost benefit analysis
where we take a critical and conservative look at the upfront and ongoing costs and
attempt to quantify the potential financial impact.
In the time that I have been consulting on lubrication programs, I've found that
most companies are losing between five percent and 15 percent of their annual
maintenance budget to poor lubrication. I use a very comprehensive tool, along
with specific case studies, to evaluate the current practice and tie it into an analysis
like the one shown in Table 1. In this example, I was able to conclude that this
company is losing more than $2.5 million every year due to poor lubrication from
an annual maintenance budget of $15 million. Of that $2.5 million about 20
percent of that can be immediately addressed. We'll call this the low hanging fruit
or the biggest bang for your buck. This cost benefit analysis (CBA) is based on
discounted cash flow analysis to value the project using the concepts of the time
value of money. Because we know that the value of a dollar is worth more today
than at any point in the future and there is a cost of using this capital on this
improvement program, your accounting team and executive management will
require that all future cash flows are estimated and discounted to give their present
values. What we end up with is the value of the potential return in today's dollars.
(Table 1)
It's easy to see the return on investment is quite significant. After a $95 thousand
initial investment to tackle the immediately-addressable lubrication losses, and
after ongoing costs of about $37 thousand per year, the five-year net present value
(NPV) is close to $1.3 million. This is a great investment and, in this case, we
really are just scratching the surface.