4 - Flexural Analysis of RC Beams
4 - Flexural Analysis of RC Beams
4 - Flexural Analysis of RC Beams
When the beam is subjected to a transverse load ⇒ internal forces build up (moment
and shear forces).
Concrete in compression 1
" Transverse load is
very high (almost at b
fc C
failure) (i.e. cross-
section stress
variation is non- c M
linear). The
compression is now T
carried by concrete,
while tension stress
(very high) is handled
by steel
reinforcement. 1 Reinforcing Steel in tension
Neglect concrete in tension
3) ε c,ult = 0.003 .
E s ε y εs ≤ εy
fs =
f εs ≥ εy
y
Note: ACI does not allow fc' to be less than 17 MPa (ACI 5.1.1).
For any cross-sectional area (of any shape), a key drawing for flexural analysis of the
beam is shown in the following drawing:
Where:
d : effective depth of a section, measured from extreme compression fiber to the center
d t : net tensile depth of a section, measured from extreme compression fiber to the center
of the steel reinforcement at the farthest layer (i.e. layer closest to the extreme tensile
fiber) (mm).
m : centroid of the compression concrete area measured from top compression fiber (mm).
ε t : net tensile reinforcement strain (at center of farthest tensile steel reinforcement).
φM n ≥ M ult,max
[moment design capacity for the cross [maximum moment due to ultimate (factored)
section] loads]
φVn ≥ Vult,max
[Shear design capacity for the cross section] [maximum (critical) shear due to ultimate loads]
One can notice how “frighten” the ACI code, which is demonstrated by lowering the
capacity of a structural member ( φ < 1.0), and in the same time, increasing the amount
of service loads expected to be subjected upon the structural member (load factor >
1.0 [i.e. “1.2” for dead load and “1.6” for live load]).
Note:
3) Reflects importance of the member (i.e. the higher the importance of the
member, the lower the value of “ φ ” is [ φ column < φ beam , which reflects the
importance of the column over the beam].
5) Reflects the degree of uncertainty and mode of failure (i.e. the higher the
uncertainty, the lower the value of “ φ ” is, also, φ shear < φ moment , which is
related that the shear failure is more brittle behavior than the flexural
failure).
1.4
f fc' ≤ 31.36 MPa
y
ρ min =
fc'
fc' ≥ 31.36 MPa
4fy
As
Note: steel ratio: ρ=
A eff
b ≤ 2b w
bw bw
“Effective area, Aeff, for different shapes, shown as the shaded area”
The basic concept of the balanced steel ratio “ ρ b ” or balanced steel area “ A s,b ” is to
have a steel amount in the cross section that will result in simultaneous steel yield and
concrete crush at failure (i.e. ε c = 0.003 ).
0.003 εy
=
cb d − cb
fy
∵ εy =
Es
fy
0.003 200 × 10
3
⇒ =
cb d − cb
600 fy
⇒ =
cb d − cb
or,
600 d = 600 + fy c b
( )
600
∴ cb = d
600 + f
y
∑ Fx = 0
∵ a b = β 1c b
600
0.85β 1 fc' d b
0.85 fc' β 1 c b b 600 + fy
⇒ A s.b = =
fy fy
A s,b
∵ ρb =
bd
fc' 600
∴ ρ b = 0.85β 1 (for rectangular beams only !!)
fy 600 + fy
The student should be able to use the same procedure to find "A s,b " or "ρ b " for
different shape cross-sections !!
" It should be stated that this kind of failure is considered to be brittle, since no
yielding has occurred.
" In the (ACI 318-99), the code limits a maximum steel ratio, or maximum area of
steel as:
To ensure ductile failure, the new code (ACI 318-02 & ACI 318-05) plays another
game now to ensure ductile failure, in which the strength reduction factor “ φ ”
becomes variable depending on the net tensile strain value “ ε t ”, which will be
explained later.
So, if:
The new code ACI 318-02 & ACI 318-05 play it differently, as shown in the figure
below, but let us first define the new introduced symbol “ ε t ” , which is referred to the
tensile strain at the center of the farthest tensile reinforcement layer (farthest steel
layer from the N.A.) and is named “net tensile reinforcement strain”.
Notes:
! The code divides the regions into three, based on the “steel net tensile strain”, ε t :
The student is advised to try to derive the above equations with the help of the graph
shown in the previous page.
As one can conclude from the above equation of “ φ ”, the code seems to award the
designer if ε t ≥ 0.005 , which leads in an increase in the value of “ φ ” to a value of 0.9.
While it tends to panelize the designer by further reduction in “ φ ” as ε t < 0.005 .
Now, for grade 420 steel, i.e., fy = 420 MPa (which is the main type used in Kuwait):
fy 420
⇒ εy = = ≈ 0.002
Es 200 × 10 3
The following equation and graph related to the strength reduction factor “ φ ” for
fy = 420 MPa:
I. Rectangular Beams:
" The code requires that when beam fails, ε t ≥ 0.004 (i.e. ε t ≥ ≈ 2ε y ) ⇒ most
likely the steel reinforcement (at reinforcement centroid) had already yielded,
that is:
ε s ≥ ε y at failure (i.e. when concrete crushes [that is, when ε c = 0.003 ]!! ).
⇒ 0.85fc' (β 1 c ∗ b ) = A s fy
A s fy
∴c = '
0.85 β 1 b fc
a = β1 c
a
Mn = As fy d −
2
But, we need (or ACI requires) to find the beam flexural strength: φMn
εt − ε y
∵ φ = 0.65 + 0.25
0.005 − ε y
0.003 εt d − c
= ⇒ ε t = 0.003 t
c dt − c c
a
∴ φMn = φA s fy d −
2
Given:
As (mm2 ) ,b (mm) , d (mm) ,dt (mm) , fc' (MPa) , fy (MPa)
Find: ΦMn
As
ρ=
bd
1.4
f fc' ≤ 31.36 MPa
y
ρ min =
fc'
fc' ≥ 31.36 MPa
4fy
increase "ρ"
d − c A s fy
is ε t ≥ 0.004 ? ε t = 0.003 t c=
c 0.85 β 1 b fc'
NO
YES
Decrease "ρ"
φ = 0.9 εt − εy
0.65 + for any fy
0.02 − 4ε y
φ=
a = β 1c 0.48 + 83 ε if f = 420 MPa
t y
a
φMn = φA s fy d − ∗ 10 −6
(KN.m) 2 N.mm toit toKN.m
convert from
( ) ( )
END
8 0.394 50.3 101 151 201 251 302 352 402 452 503
12 0.887 113 226 339 452 565 679 792 905 1020 1130
14 1.207 154 308 462 616 770 924 1080 1230 1390 1540
16 1.552 199 398 597 796 995 1194 1393 1592 1791 1990
18 1.995 254 509 763 1020 1270 1530 1780 2040 2290 2540
20 2.463 314 628 942 1260 1570 1880 2200 2510 2830 3140
22 3.042 387 774 1161 1548 1935 2322 2709 3096 3483 3870
25 3.973 510 1020 1530 2040 2550 3060 3570 4080 4590 5100
28 4.827 616 1230 1850 2460 3080 3700 4310 4930 5540 6160
30 5.542 707 1410 2120 2830 3530 4240 4950 5660 6360 7070
32 6.404 819 1638 2457 3276 4095 4914 5733 6552 7371 8190
34 7.118 908 1820 2720 3630 4540 5450 6360 7260 8170 9080
36 7.907 1006 2012 3018 4024 5030 6036 7042 8048 9045 10060
17/34
Ex.
fc' = 28 MPa
fy = 420 MPa
Solution:
As 1530
ρ= = ≅ 0.0119
bd 300 ∗ 430
1.4
ρ min = {since f
y < 31.36 MPa
}
fy
1.4
⇒ ρ min = = 0.0033
420
∵ ρ = 0.0119 > ρ min = 0.0033 ⇒ O.K. !!
0.85 fc' (β 1c ) b = A s fy
A s fy 1530 ∗ 420
⇒c= = = 105.88 mm
0.85 β 1 b f c
'
0.85 ∗ ( 0.85 ) ∗ 300 ∗ 28
Strain Distribution:
0.003 εt
=
105.88 430 − 105.88
⇒ φ = 0.9
∵ a = β 1c = 0.85 ∗ 105.88 ≈ 90 mm
a a
∵ φM n = φA s fy d − (m= for rectangular sections only !!)
2 2
90
∴ φM n = 0.9 ∗ 1530 ∗ 420 ∗ 430 − ∗ 10 −6
2 N.mm to itKN.m
to convert from
( ) ( )
⇒ φM n = 222.67 KN.m
Kg
w L = 100 ≅ 1 KN
m2 m2
Kg
w D = 200 ≅ 2 KN
m2 m2
fc' = 32 MPa
fy = 420 MPa
∵ w ult = 4 KN/ m 2
π D2 Kg m 1 KN
⇒ W= h × 1000 3 × 10 2 × = 62.8 KN
4 m s 1000 N
1 2
M ult,max = 66.24 ∗ 2 − ∗ (16 ) ∗ (2 ) ∗
2 3
∴ M ult,max = 121.81 KN.m
Now, let us find the section flexural (moment) strength capacity “ φMn ”, and what we
want is to conclude that:
φM n ≥ M ult,max
First, let us find the centroid of the steel reinforcement, in order to get the effective
depth value, “d” (as you used to do in Statics !!)
∴ m = 32.5mm
also,
25
d t = 500 − 50 − 8 − = 429.5mm
concrete cov er stirrup diameter 2
half bar diameter
As 5 ∗ 510
ρ= = = 0.0207
bd 300 ∗ 409.5
fc' 32
ρ min = = = 0.00337
4fy 4 ( 420 )
f ' − 28 32 − 28
β 1 = 0.85 − 0.05 c = 0.85 − 0.05 ≅ 0.821
7 7
5 ∗ 510 ∗ 420
⇒c= ≅ 159.87 mm
0.85 ∗ 32 ∗ ( 0.821 ) ∗ 300
εt 0.003
∵ =
dt − c c
( 429.5 − 159.87 )
⇒ ε t = 0.003 = 0.00506 > 0.005 ⇒ Tension − Re gion
159.87
⇒ φ = 0.9
a
φM n = φA s fy d −
2
131.25
= 0.9 ∗ ( 5 ∗ 510 ) ∗ 420 ∗ 409.5 − × 10 −6
2
What do you think? Can it take two tanks ???? Check it your self?
Now, let us try to challenge ourselves, by taking a special shape cross-section beam,
DON’T PANIC !! As long you understand the principles (which if you don’t, this would be
the best time to PANIC!!), you should not be afraid of any Problem !!
fc' = 28 MPa
fy = 420 MPa
Solution:
As 1194
ρ= = ≅ 0.005
A eff ( 600 ∗ 400 )
1.4
ρ min = {since f
y < 31.36 MPa
}
fy
1.4
⇒ ρ min = = 0.0033
420
∵ ρ = 0.005 > ρ min = 0.0033 ⇒ O.K. !!
Stress Distribution:
0.85 fc' a b = A s fy
A s fy 1194 ∗ 420
⇒a= = = 105.35 mm > 100 mm
0.85 b f c
'
0.85 ∗ 28 ∗ 200
Stress Distribution:
0.85 fc' Ac = A s fy
a 102.68
⇒c= = = 120.8 mm
β1 0.85
Strain Distribution:
0.003 εt
=
120.8 600 − 120.8
∵ φM n = φA s fy d − m
102.68 − 100
( 200 ∗ 100 ∗ 50 ) + (102.68 − 100 ) ∗ 400 ∗ + 100
m=
∑ Ai ∗ y# = 2
= 52.61 mm
∑ Ai (200 ∗ 100 ) + (102.68 − 100 ) ∗ 400
⇒ φM n = 247.05 KN.m
Consider the singly reinforced rectangular concrete beam been discussed earlier, it was
found that the ultimate moment capacity to be:
a
φMn = φA s fy d −
2
∵ ∑ Fx = 0
0.85 fc' ab = A s fy
A s fy
⇒a=
0.85 fc' b
∵ A s = ρbd ⇒ a =
(ρ b d ) f y
=
ρd fy
0.85f b c
'
0.85 fc'
ρ d fy
0.85 fc' ρd fy
⇒ φMn = φ ( ρbd ) fy d − = φ ρ fy d − '
bd
2 1.7 f
c
fy
⇒ φMn = φ ρ fy 1 − 0.59 ρ ' bd 2 , or :
fc
φM n = R u b d 2 , where:
fy
R u = φ ρ fy 1 − 0.59 ρ ' “Design Strength Coefficient”
fc
0.003 0.004
=
c 0.004 d t − c 0.004
3 3
c 0.004 = d t i.e. if c= d t ⇒ ε t = 0.004
7 7
∑ Fx = 0
∵ a 0.004 = β 1c 0.004
A s,0.004
∵ ρ 0.004 =
bd
3 fc'
0.85β 1 b dt
7 fy
⇒ ρ 0.004 =
bd
3 f' d
∴ ρ 0.004 = 0.85 β 1 c t (for rectangular beams only !!)
7 fy d
3 f' d
∴ ρ 0.005 = 0.85 β 1 c t (for rectangular beams only !!)
8 fy d
Or:
7
ρ 0.005 = ρ 0.004
8
εt − εy
φ (ε t ) = 0.65 + 0.25
0.005 − ε y
And , for a specific steel grade fy = 420 MPa (which is the case in Kuwait):
φ ≅ 0.48 + 83 ε t
d − c d
ε t = 0.003 t ⇒ ε t = 0.003 t − 0.003
c c
d
φ ≅ 0.48 + 83 0.003 t − 0.003
c
d
⇒ φ ≅ 0.48 + 0.25 t − 0.25
c
d
∴ φ ≅ 0.23 + 0.25 t
c
1 7 fy d
⇒ φ ≅ 0.23 + 0.25 ρ 0.004
c 3 0.85 β 1 fc'
or,
7 ρ 0.004
φ ( ρ ) ≅ 0.23 + (for fy = 420 MPa, and Rectangular Beam)
12 ρ
The general formula for φ ( ρ ) for a RC rectangular beam with any fy value can be
derived if the general equation for φ (ε t ) is used:
εt − εy
φ (ε t ) = 0.65 + 0.25
0.005 − ε y
1 ρ 0.004
φ ( ρ ) ≅ 0.65 + 0.007 − 0.003 + ε y
( ) (for any fy, and Rectangular
( 0.02 − 4ε ) y ρ
Beam)
the flow chart for the analysis of singly reinforced rectangular beams (2nd version) is
shown in the next page.
Given:
As (mm ) ,b (mm) ,d (mm) , dt (mm) , fc' (MPa) , fy (MPa)
2
As
ρ=
bd Find: φM n
1.4
f fc' ≤ 31.36 MPa
y NO Is ρ ≥ ρmin ?
ρ min =
fc'
fc' ≥ 31.36 MPa
4fy
Not a good section
increase "ρ"
3 f ' d
ρ 0.004 = 0.85 β 1 c t YES
7 fy d
0.85 fc' ≤ 28 MPa
f ' − 28
is ρ ≤ ρ 0.004 ? β 1 = 0.85 − 0.05 c 28 < fc' < 56 MPa
7
NO
0.65 fc' ≥ 56 MPa
Not a good section YES
Decrease "ρ"
7
ρ 0.005 = ρ 0.004
8
is ρ ≤ ρ 0.005 ?
φ = 0.9 YES
NO
1 ρ 0.004
0.65 + 0.007 − 0.003 + ε y
( ) any fy
0.02 − 4ε y
( ) ρ
φ≅
7 ρ 0.004
0.234 + fy = 420 MPa
12 ρ
fy
φMn = φ ρ fy 1 − 0.59 ρ ' bd 2 ∗ 10 −6 END
(KN.m) fc
convert it to from
( N.mm ) to (KN.m)
fc' = 28 MPa
fy = 420 MPa
As 1530
ρ= = ≅ 0.0119
bd 300 ∗ 430
1.4
ρ min = {since f
y < 31.36 MPa
}
fy
1.4
⇒ ρ min = = 0.0033
420
7
⇒ ρ 0.005 = 0.0206 ≅ 0.018
8
∴ φ=0.9
fy
φMn = φ ρ fy 1 − 0.59 ρ ' bd 2
fc
420 2
φMn = 0.9 ∗ ( 0.0119 ) ∗ 420 ∗ 1 − 0.59 ∗ ( 0.0119 ) ∗ ∗ (300 ) ∗ ( 430 ) ∗ 10 −6
(KN.m) 28 conv ert it to from
( N.mm ) to (KN.m )
Note: for the same example which was solved using the 1st version procedure, the solution
was 222.67 KN.m, which can be considered to be equal to the above solution (since many
approximations been applied in both procedures !!
We are ready now to go to the design process of rectangular beams !! See you !!