Diksha 1
Diksha 1
Diksha 1
Gig worker is someone who works in the ecoconomy, providing services to customers
through an online platform.1 Indian government passed social security code 2020, which
included the definition of gig workers as “ person who performs work or participates in a
work arrangement and earns from such activities outside of traditional employer-employee
relationship”2. Whether it’s a 45 dergee hot temprature or water logging outside due to heavy
rains, storm or too much pollution, day or night. There are gig workers who make almost
everything possible. Today, in this era of convenience we don’t have to worry ourselves
because we can order or book almost everything merely through a smartphone applications.
There are gig workers behind the veil which provide us all goods and services at our comfort
level. They get paid for individual acts. the first time the word gig was used for a temporary
paid job in 1952 when an influential author ‘jack Kerouac’ wrote an article about how he got
a gig to work as a brakeman on a railroad. In gig economy is two types , first is service based
gig economy which consist of is low, semi skilled workers like delivery agents. Service based
workers are also known as blue collar gig workers. On the other hand there are knowledge
based gig economy which include consultants and data scientists. These are known as white
collar gig workers. But usually, whenever we talk about gig workers, it is the first category
that is referred to.
The gig economy refers to a way of working where individuals have temporary jobs or undertake
separate pieces of work, each paid separately, instead of being employed by a single employee,
Workers often find opportunities to earn a living by doing various odd jobs as they become
available.3 The gig economy has witnessed a rapid rise in India, propelled by technological
advancements and the shift towards flexible work arrangements, the exsisting legal
frameworks, designed primarily for traditional employer-employee relationship , face
significant challenges when applied to gig workers. In recent times the Indian government
has introduced the new Labour codes, which for the first time formally define gig workers.
This research seeks to explore how these evolving frameworks intersect with rights and
protections of gig workers India.
1
"Gig worker." Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press, https://www.oed.com/
2
Section 2(35) of the Social Security Code, 2020
3
"Gig economy," Cambridge Dictionary, accessed October 22, 2023,
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/gig-eco.
1
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The concept of gig work has evolved over time, influenced by technological advancements,
economic changes, and shifts in the labor market. Here’s a brief historical overview of gig
workers and the rise of the gig economy:
Artisans, Laborers, and Freelancers: Before the industrial revolution, independent work or
"gigs" were common among artisans, traders, and laborers. People would offer services on a
task-by-task or project basis, whether as craftsmen, musicians, or manual laborers.
Agricultural Day Laborers: In agricultural societies, "day labor" or short-term work for
farmers during harvest or planting seasons was a common form of temporary employment.
Performers: The term "gig" itself originated in the 1920s, referring to musicians who were
hired for a one-time performance. Musicians, actors, and other performers were some of the
earliest modern gig workers, as their jobs were often project-based, short-term, and
inconsistent.
Post-Industrial Revolution: With the rise of factories and organized labor in the late 19th and
early 20th centuries, the economy shifted toward full-time employment in large industries.
However, some forms of gig work, such as freelance journalism, contract-based design, and
manual labor, continued to exist on the margins.
Post-WWII Boom: During the post-World War II economic boom (1950s-1960s), traditional
full-time employment with benefits became the norm in many developed countries, but there
was still a demand for temporary and part-time workers in various industries, including
education, healthcare, and manufacturing .Rise of Freelance Professions (1970s-1990s): The
expansion of corporate and creative industries in the 1970s and 1980s created a demand for
2
freelance workers in advertising, design, and consulting. This was the precursor to the
modern gig economy, as workers sought more independence from traditional corporate
structures.
The Internet and Digital Work: In the late 1990s, the rise of the internet began to change
the landscape of gig work. Online platforms such as eBay, Craigslist, and freelance job
boards like Elance (now Upwork) allowed people to offer services and products to a global
market. Digital nomads and remote workers started to emerge, leveraging technology to work
independently.
The Dot-Com Boom: This era saw the proliferation of freelance work in IT, programming,
content creation, and design. Digital tools and communication technologies made it easier for
freelancers to connect with clients around the world.
Economic Instability: The 2008 financial crisis and resulting recession led to widespread
unemployment and underemployment. Many people turned to gig work out of necessity, and
companies began hiring more temporary workers to reduce costs. This led to a surge in
demand for freelance and part-time work.
On-Demand Platforms: Around the same time, companies like Uber (founded in 2009),
Lyft, and Airbnb emerged as pioneers of the "on-demand economy." These platforms allowed
individuals to offer services like ride-sharing, delivery, and short-term rentals, redefining
what gig work could look like.
The expansion of the gig economy era represents a significant transformation in the labor
market, characterized by a shift from traditional, full-time employment to flexible, short-term
3
work arrangements facilitated by digital platforms. This evolution has been driven by various
factors:
1. Technological Advancements: The rise of mobile apps and online platforms has made it
easier for individuals to connect with potential clients and customers, enabling the rapid
growth of gig work in sectors such as transportation, delivery, and freelance services.
3. Economic Necessity: In the wake of economic downturns and job market fluctuations,
many individuals turn to gig work as a primary or supplementary source of income. This
trend has been especially pronounced during crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
4. Globalization: The gig economy is not confined to local markets; it operates on a global
scale. Workers can offer their services to clients worldwide, increasing competition and
opportunities for both workers and businesses.
5. Regulatory Developments: As gig work has expanded, so too have discussions around
regulations and protections for gig workers. Governments and organizations are increasingly
recognizing the need to establish frameworks that address the unique challenges faced by this
workforce.
6. Diversity of Services* The gig economy encompasses a wide range of services beyond
ride-sharing and food delivery, including freelance writing, graphic design, tutoring, and
many others. This diversity continues to grow as more industries embrace gig-based models.
Platform Economy Boom: In the 2010s, the gig economy exploded with the emergence of a
wide range of online platforms for various types of work. These are some example:-
The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted the gig economy, leading to significant shifts
in both opportunities and challenges for gig workers. On one hand, the demand for delivery
services surged as lockdowns and social distancing measures prompted consumers to rely
heavily on platforms like Uber Eats and DoorDash, providing income opportunities for gig
workers in these sectors. Conversely, gig workers in transportation faced severe challenges,
with a sharp decline in ride-sharing demand leading to income instability and job losses.
Health and safety concerns also escalated, as many gig workers had to navigate increased
risks without adequate protections or support. The pandemic accelerated the digital
transformation of various industries, resulting in a proliferation of new gig platforms and
remote work opportunities, which attracted more individuals seeking flexible employment.
Additionally, the vulnerabilities exposed by the crisis spurred advocacy for better protections
and rights for gig workers, prompting some governments to consider regulations and
emergency relief measures. Ultimately, the pandemic not only highlighted the fragility of gig
work but also reshaped long-term work preferences, as more people began to view gig work
as a viable alternative to traditional employment.
Legal Recognition and Protections: As the gig economy has grown, so have debates over the
classification of gig workers. Many gig workers argue that they should be treated as
employees, with access to benefits like healthcare, paid leave, and minimum wage
protections. In response, several governments have begun to create laws aimed at regulating
gig platforms and extending some protections to gig workers.
CALIFORNIA’S AB5 (2019): In the U.S., California passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) in
2019, which sought to classify many gig workers as employees. However, Proposition 22,
5
passed in 2020, exempted companies like Uber and Lyft from these requirements, allowing
them to maintain their gig workers as independent contractors while offering some benefits.
EU PROPOSALS: The European Union has proposed new rules aimed at improving
working conditions for gig workers, focusing on issues like fair wages, job security, and
transparency in how platforms operate.
PANDEMIC IMPACT: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the precarity of gig workers,
as many lost income with no access to unemployment benefits. This led to renewed calls for
stronger protections for gig workers, as many were deemed "essential" workers but lacked
safety nets.
The gig economy has deep historical roots, but it has grown exponentially in the last two
decades due to technological innovation, economic shifts, and changing workforce dynamics.
While gig work provides flexibility and opportunity, it also presents challenges related to
worker rights, job security, and economic inequality. As the gig economy continues to evolve,
so too will the debate around how to protect gig workers and ensure fair treatment in this
rapidly changing labor market.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The rise of the gig economy has transformed the labor market, leading to increased flexibility
and opportunities for many workers. However, this shift has also resulted in significant
challenges regarding the protection of gig workers' rights. Many gig workers face uncertain
income, lack of access to essential benefits such as healthcare and retirement plans, and
insufficient legal protections against exploitation and unfair treatment. This lack of
6
safeguards not only impacts the livelihoods of these workers but also raises broader questions
about social equity, labor standards, and economic sustainability in a rapidly evolving work
environment. Statement of the Problem. The gig workers often operate in a precarious legal
and financial environment, with limited access to labor rights, social protections, and benefits
typically afforded to employees in standard employment relationships. This lack of protection
raises concerns about income stability, job security, health insurance, workplace safety, and
retirement benefits, ultimately impacting the quality of life and economic security of gig
workers.
This research aims to explore the current status of gig workers’ rights, examine the legal
frameworks and protections (or lack thereof) available to them, and identify policy gaps and
challenges in safeguarding their rights. The study will investigate possible measures to
protect and promote the rights of gig workers, balancing the needs of workers for fair
treatment with the interests of businesses that rely on flexible labor models. Ultimately, this
research will seek to recommend policy interventions and regulatory frameworks that can
improve protections for gig workers while supporting the evolving nature of the gig economy.
SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
This study is significant as it aims to illuminate the pressing issues surrounding the rights of
gig workers, contributing to a deeper understanding of their vulnerabilities and challenges.
By exploring the implications of inadequate protections, the research can inform
policymakers, businesses, and advocacy groups about the need for effective regulations and
reforms. Furthermore, the findings can raise public awareness about the realities faced by gig
workers, fostering a more informed dialogue on labor rights and economic justice.
Ultimately, this study seeks to advocate for a fairer gig economy that recognizes the
contributions of all workers and ensures their rights are protected. Additionally, the study
contributes to a deeper understanding of the socio-economic challenges faced by gig workers,
highlighting their experiences and needs. This knowledge can drive advocacy efforts and
influence the development of effective policies, ultimately promoting a more equitable and
sustainable gig economy. By addressing these critical issues, the study seeks to enhance the
well-being of gig workers and contribute to broader discussions on labor rights in the modern
economy.
7
SCOPE OF STUDY
The scope of this study will encompass various aspects of gig work, including the legal
frameworks governing gig employment, the economic conditions affecting gig workers, and
the social implications of their lack of protections. It will focus on specific gig industries,
such as ride-sharing, food delivery, and freelance services, while examining the differences in
rights and protections across regions and jurisdictions. The research will also investigate
existing policies and potential reforms aimed at enhancing the rights of gig workers,
including legislative initiatives and collective bargaining efforts. By focusing on these
dimensions, the study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of
gig work and the necessary steps toward safeguarding workers' rights.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
According to the NITI Aayog report titled “INDIA'S BOOMING GIG AND
PLATFORM ECONOMY,”4 published in June 2022, the number of gig workers in India
has witnessed substantial growth. In the fiscal year 2019-20, approximately 6.8 million gig
workers participated in this economy, accounting for 2.4% of the non-farm workforce and
1.3% of the total workforce in the country. By 2020-21, this number rose to 7.7 million,
representing 2.6% of the non-agricultural workforce and 1.5% of the overall workforce in
India.
The projections for the future indicate a dramatic expansion of the gig economy. The NITI
Aayog report estimates that the gig workforce will increase to 23.5 million by 2029-30,
which would constitute about 6.7% of the non-agricultural workforce and 4.1% of total
employment in India. This anticipated growth underscores the increasing reliance on gig
work as a viable livelihood option for millions of individuals, driven by factors such as
technological advancements, changing consumer behavior , and the desire for flexible work
arrangements.
Despite the potential benefits of gig work, such as autonomy and diverse income sources,
challenges persist regarding the rights and protections of gig workers. The lack of formal
4
NITI Aayog, "Report," 2022, http://www.niti.gov.in (accessed June 25, 2022).
8
employment benefits, job security, and legal recognition poses significant risks to their
livelihoods. As the gig economy continues to expand, addressing these challenges becomes
paramount to ensure that gig workers are adequately protected and can contribute
meaningfully to the economy.
This literature review highlights the need for further research into the implications of this
rapid growth, particularly in terms of legal frameworks, social protections, and the overall
impact on workers’ rights. The findings of such studies will be critical for informing policy
decisions and creating a more equitable work environment for gig workers in India.
THE FAIRWOK ANNUAL REPORT 2022 studies 11 Indian platforms like Zomato, uber
company ,urban company, big basket and it was found that not a single one of these
platforms could prove that their gig workers get at least local living wage after covering all
work related costs.5 THE FAIRWORK ANNUAL REPORT 2022 evaluates the working
conditions of digital labor platforms across the globe. It assesses how well these platforms
uphold fair labor practices based on a set of principles, including
The report ranks various platforms based on their adherence to these principles and provides
insights into the state of the gig economy. It highlights areas for improvement and offers
recommendations for both platform operators and policymakers to enhance the quality of
work in the gig economy.
THE FLORISH VENTURES REPORT 6 reveals a dramatic fall in income for gig workers
during the pandemic. This highlights the precarious nature of gig work, where income
stability can vanish rapidly due to external factors during COVID-19. Despite the income
collapse, many gig workers demonstrated resilience. The study found that while 47%
struggled to cover expenses for a month without borrowing, 52% could manage for longer
periods. This suggests a degree of financial adaptability among workers, though many
resorted to borrowing or depleting savings to cope with the crisis. The findings from this
5
Matthew Cole, Alessio Bertolini, Tatiana López, Pablo Aguera Reneses, Jonas Valente, Patrick Feuerstein, and
Murali Shanmugavelan, Fairwork Annual Report 2022 (2022): 42–43.
6
Flourish Ventures, *The Digital Hustle: Gig Worker Financial Lives Under Pressure, India Spotlight 2020*,
accessed October 22, 2023,
https://flourishventures.com/research/the-digital-hustle-gig-worker-financial-lives-under-pressure-india-spotligh
t-2020/.
9
report paint a vivid picture of the challenges faced by gig workers in India during the
pandemic. The data underscores the vulnerabilities inherent in gig work, where income can
fluctuate drastically based on external circumstances. The resilience exhibited by many
workers, while commendable, also reveals the precariousness of their financial situations.The
report's call for fintech innovation is particularly timely. As gig workers increasingly rely on
digital platforms, there’s a unique opportunity for fintech companies to develop tailored
financial products that meet their specific needs. Solutions that facilitate better income
management, savings, and access to credit could significantly enhance the financial security
of these workers.
Overall, the India Spotlight provides valuable insights into the intersection of gig work,
financial instability, and the potential for technological solutions to foster resilience in
challenging times. It serves as a crucial resource for policymakers, fintech entrepreneurs, and
anyone interested in understanding the evolving landscape of work and financial security in a
post-pandemic world.
7
The recent report by IPSOS RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED highlights a significant
shift in the gig economy, revealing that 88% of gig workers now depend on gig platforms as
their primary income source. This marks a transition from gig work being merely
supplemental to becoming a primary means of livelihood for many self-employed
individuals. The report indicates the emergence of a new generation of gig workers
characterized by their entrepreneurial spirit and adaptability. Notably, gig work is becoming
integrated across various sectors, with the construction industry projected to create an
estimated 100 million jobs by 2030, a substantial portion of which is expected to be filled by
gig workers. This trend underscores the growing acceptance of gig labor and its potential to
address labor shortages and meet flexibility needs.
Furthermore, the report emphasizes that population growth, urbanization, and technological
advancements will generate new challenges and opportunities for both employers and gig
workers. As urban areas expand, the demand for services in sectors like mobility,
e-commerce, and retail—where around 40% of gig workers are currently employed—will
7
Madhav Krishna, "Understanding the Gig Economy in the Age of AI," Hindustan Times, May 16, 2024,
https://www.hindustantimes.com.
10
increase. With at least seven million gig workers in India and numbers rising daily, this
demographic is becoming increasingly vital to the economy.
Importantly, the report stresses the responsibility of recruitment platforms, noting that it is not
enough to simply connect gig workers to opportunities; there is an urgent need for these
platforms to facilitate continuous upskilling. As the gig economy evolves, workers must
enhance their skill sets to remain competitive and seize emerging opportunities. Overall, the
Ipsos report paints an optimistic picture of the gig economy in India, showcasing its potential
to drive economic growth while also highlighting the challenges of upskilling and support. As
gig workers become more central to various industries, ensuring access to training and
development resources will be crucial for fostering a resilient and adaptable workforce. The
insights underscore the importance of viewing gig workers as key stakeholders in India’s
economic future, whose ability to thrive in this dynamic landscape will be essential for
achieving a vibrant and economically thriving nation.
In a recent Instagram video, Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal8 documented his experience
working as a food delivery agent for a day, alongside his wife, Grecia Munoz. The video
provides an eye-opening look into the challenges faced by delivery workers, as Goyal
encountered barriers when trying to enter the Ambience Mall in Gurgaon. Upon arriving to
pick up an order from Haldiram's, he was directed to use a staircase instead of a more
convenient entrance, revealing a lack of accessibility for delivery personnel. After climbing
to the third floor, he faced further disappointment when informed that delivery workers were
not allowed to enter the mall and had to wait in the stairwell for their orders. Throughout the
experience, Goyal interacted with security guards and other delivery workers, emphasizing
the need for better treatment and working conditions for gig economy employees. He
highlighted the importance of collaboration between food delivery platforms and malls to
improve the environment for these workers. Goyal's candid portrayal of his day as a delivery
agent serves as a reminder of the often-overlooked challenges that gig workers face, and his
commitment to advocating for humane treatment and better working conditions is a step
towards fostering a more equitable gig economy. This initiative not only sheds light on the
8
Muskaan Sharma, "Deepinder Goyal Stopped from Using Gurgaon Mall’s Main Entrance
While Delivering Zomato Orders," Hindustan Times, October 6, 2024,
https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/deepinder-goyal-stopped-from-entering-restaurant-
while-delivering-zomato-orders-shares-video-101728217226688.html.
.
11
realities of delivery work but also reinforces the responsibility of businesses to support their
employees, ultimately aiming for a more respectful and understanding approach towards
those who play a crucial role in their operations. Throughout the day, Goyal interacted with
security guards and other delivery workers, gathering feedback about their experiences. He
noted the need for better working conditions and called for malls to adopt a more humane
approach towards delivery partners.
In a Bharat sahu’ case ,9delivery man murdered over a Cash on Delivery (COD) iPhone
order highlights the darker side of the gig economy and the inherent risks faced by delivery
personnel. The incident, involving a 30-year-old delivery boy named Bharat Sahu, who was
killed by a customer named Gajanan, underscores the vulnerabilities that delivery workers
experience in their line of work.
According to police reports, Gajanan had ordered an iPhone worth approximately Rs 1.5 lakh
through Flipkart and chose the COD payment option. When Bharat Sahu ,30 years old young
man arrived to deliver the phone on September 23, he was brutally attacked and strangled by
Gajanan and an accomplice. They then disposed of his body in a sack, showcasing a
disturbing escalation of violence that reflects not only a betrayal of trust but also the
dangerous situations delivery workers can encounter. The case took a critical turn when Sahu
was reported missing after failing to return home for two days. His family’s efforts to locate
him prompted a police investigation that utilized call logs to trace Gajanan’s number,
eventually leading to the confession of an accomplice, Akash. The authorities' ongoing search
for Sahu's body emphasizes the urgency of justice in this case and highlights the procedural
steps police must take when a worker goes missing. This incident sheds light on the
precarious nature of gig work, where delivery personnel often operate without protection and
can be subjected to violent crime. It raises essential questions about the responsibilities of
e-commerce platforms in ensuring the safety of their workers and the measures needed to
mitigate risks associated with cash transactions in the gig economy. Overall, the case serves
as a stark reminder of the need for better safety protocols and support systems for delivery
workers, whose lives can be endangered by the very act of fulfilling their jobs.
9
Lucknow man orders iPhone on COD, kills delivery boy to evade payment
SECTIONS.https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/lucknow-man-orders-iphone-on-cod-kills-delivery-boy-to-
evade-payment/articleshow/113836835.cms make fotnote
12
In Hitesha chandranee’s case10, a self-described beauty and fashion influencer, and
Kamaraj, a Zomato delivery boy, sheds light on the complexities of interactions between gig
workers and customers. Chandranee accused Kamaraj of assault following a delivery dispute,
claiming he had attacked her. However, subsequent developments revealed a different
narrative: Kamaraj approached the police to file a complaint against her, alleging that her
anger stemmed from a delay in her order. This situation highlights several critical issues
within the gig economy. Firstly, it underscores the vulnerability of delivery workers, who
may face hostility from customers over factors often beyond their control, such as delivery
delays. Kamaraj's decision to seek legal recourse illustrates the challenges workers face in
asserting their rights and seeking protection against false accusations.
The police response, which led to an FIR being filed against Chandranee for several offenses,
including wrongful restraint and assault, demonstrates the legal system's involvement in
mediating disputes between service providers and consumers. The application of sections of
the Indian Penal Code, such as those addressing assault and wrongful restraint, reflects the
seriousness of the allegations and the potential consequences for Chandranee. Overall, this
incident serves as a poignant reminder of the need for greater awareness and respect for gig
workers' rights and dignity. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing customer
complaints in a manner that does not compromise the safety and well-being of delivery
personnel. As the gig economy continues to grow, fostering a culture of mutual respect and
understanding between workers and customers will be essential to ensure a safe and
sustainable working environment.
The recent the Bombay High Court ruling11 concerning a Swiggy delivery boy emphasizes
the pressing need for legal protections and rights for gig workers. The court ordered the
police to pay Rs 20,000 to the delivery partner after quashing a First Information Report
(FIR) that was deemed to have been filed without sufficient grounds. This incident, which
10
H M Chaithanya Swamy, "FIR Against Bengaluru Woman Who Accused Zomato Delivery Boy of Assault,"
*Deccan Herald*, March 17, 2021,
https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/bengaluru/fir-against-bengaluru-woman-who-accused-zomat
o-delivery-boy-of-assault-962399.html.
11
Here’s the footnote based on the information you provided:
"Bombay HC Asks Policemen to Pay Rs 20K to Swiggy Delivery Boy for Invoking Wrong IPC Sections," *India
Today, January 5, 2023,
https://www.indiatoday.in/law/story/bombay-hc-asks-policemen-pay-rs-20k-swiggy-delivery-boy-for-invoking-
wrong-ipc-sections-2317872-2023-01-05.
13
took place during the national COVID-19 lockdown, illustrates the precarious nature of gig
work, where delivery personnel often navigate complex and sometimes hostile environments.
The case began when the delivery boy, then 18, was accused of rash driving after allegedly
injuring a stray dog while making a delivery. The police invoked several sections of the
Indian Penal Code, as well as relevant laws concerning road safety and animal welfare,
leading to significant legal repercussions for the young worker. However, the court found that
the prosecution was unjustified, highlighting a critical issue: gig workers can be vulnerable to
baseless accusations, especially in high-stress situations like the pandemic.
The High Court's decision not only underscores the importance of due process but also
reflects a growing recognition of the rights of gig workers. By holding the police accountable
for their actions, the court stated that there are legal consequences for improper handling of
cases involving delivery personnel. This sets a precedent for protecting gig workers from
undue legal scrutiny and reinforces the necessity for authorities to exercise caution and
fairness in their interactions with these workers.
Furthermore, the order to recover costs from the responsible officers serves as a reminder that
the protection of gig workers' rights is not solely a matter of personal responsibility but also
institutional accountability. As the gig economy continues to expand, it is essential for legal
frameworks to evolve in ways that safeguard workers from exploitation and ensure their
rights are upheld. In summary, this case highlights the importance of legal protections for gig
workers, emphasizing the need for fair treatment and accountability within the legal system.
It reinforces the idea that gig workers, like all employees, deserve protection against unjust
legal actions, ultimately contributing to a more equitable working environment.
s limited research that addresses the legal and social protection gaps for gig workers,
especially concerning their exclusion from traditional labor rights such as minimum wage,
health benefits, and job security. The focus has largely been on economic growth in the gig
economy, leaving the issue of workers’ rights underexplored.
14
The situation in Guwahati12 highlights significant issues regarding the rights of gig workers,
particularly in the context of ride-hailing services like Ola and Uber. The All Assam Cab
Mazdoor Sangha's call for a boycott stems from ongoing concerns about the alleged
harassment and exploitation of cab drivers. Many drivers report that, while these platforms
initially offered attractive incentives, they have since imposed high commission rates—often
between 40 to 60 percent—making it challenging for drivers to sustain their livelihoods. This
situation underscores a broader issue faced by gig workers, who often lack job security and
benefits typically associated with traditional employment, such as health insurance and
retirement savings.
The demands for better treatment and protection, including the enforcement of the Motor
Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020, highlight the urgent need for regulatory frameworks
that safeguard gig workers' rights. The calls for security measures for drivers on duty further
emphasize the precarious nature of gig work, where many individuals work long hours to
make ends meet while balancing financial obligations. The lack of responsiveness from
authorities to drivers' concerns further illustrates the systemic challenges faced by gig
workers, who often find themselves without adequate support or recourse in the face of
exploitation.
This situation calls for a reassessment of how gig workers are treated within the broader
economy, ensuring that their rights are recognized and upheld in a rapidly evolving labor
landscape.
RESEARCH GAP
Despite the rapid growth of the gig economy, there remains a significant gap in the research
addressing the protection of gig workers' rights. While studies have explored the economic
impacts and working conditions within this sector, comprehensive analyses focusing
specifically on legal protections and their effectiveness are limited. Most existing literature
tends to emphasize individual case studies or sector-specific analyses, often overlooking the
12
Saini, Neha. “Boycott Ola and Uber services, Guwahati drivers association says.” Livemint, February
1, 2023.
https://www.livemint.com/news/ola-and-uber-services-discontinued-in-guwahati-from-today-report-
11675231559922.html.
15
broader systemic issues that affect gig workers across different platforms and regions.
Additionally, there is a scarcity of empirical data on the enforcement of existing labor laws
and guidelines, such as the Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 in India, which are
intended to protect gig workers.the intersectionality of gig work—considering factors such as
gender, socioeconomic status, and regional disparities—has not been adequately addressed.
Research is needed to understand how these factors influence the experiences of gig workers
and their access to rights and protections.
Finally, there is a lack of comparative studies that examine the effectiveness of various
regulatory frameworks across different countries, which could provide valuable insights for
policymakers aiming to enhance protections for gig workers globally. Bridging these gaps
would contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by gig workers
and inform strategies for improving their rights and working conditions.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
2. To examine the prevalence and nature of labor rights violations among gig workers.
4. To evaluate the role of gig platforms in addressing or exacerbating workers' rights issues.
5. To study existing legal frameworks that could be adapted to protect gig workers.
6. To propose policy recommendations for improving the protection of gig workers’ rights.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
16
2. Whether gig workers face significant labor rights violations, and if so, in what areas?
3. Whether the lack of formal protections impacts the socioeconomic conditions of gig
workers?
4. Whether gig platforms contribute to improving or worsening workers' rights and working
conditions?
5. Whether existing labor laws adequately cover gig workers or if reforms are necessary?
6. Whether new policies can ensure better rights protection and welfare for gig workers?4.
HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis of this research design posits that enhanced legal protections and social
security measures for gig workers significantly improve their job satisfaction and financial
stability. Furthermore, it suggests that the implementation of these protections reduces
instances of exploitation and harassment, thereby fostering a more equitable work
environment within the gig economy.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study will use a mixed-methods approach. Qualitative data will be gathered through
in-depth interviews with gig workers, labor experts, and policy analysts. Quantitative analysis
will include surveys from gig workers and secondary data on labor rights violations. A
comparative legal review will assess the regulations in countries that recognize gig workers
differently. The combination of these methods will provide a comprehensive understanding of
the issues and potential solutions.
17
LIKELY CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY
The study will shed light on the vulnerabilities of gig workers and offer policy
recommendations for strengthening their rights. It will provide empirical evidence that can
guide legal reforms to ensure better protections for workers in the gig economy. Focusing on
the protection of gig workers' rights is likely to contribute significantly to the research in
several ways. Firstly, it will enhance the relevance of the study by addressing critical issues
that directly impact the livelihoods and well-being of gig workers. By framing research
questions around these rights, the study can uncover specific challenges that gig workers
face, providing insights that are timely and pertinent to ongoing debates about labor standards
in the gig economy. Secondly, this focus can lead to a more nuanced understanding of how
different legal frameworks affect gig workers’ experiences. By comparing various
jurisdictions and their approaches to gig work, the research can identify best practices and
gaps in protections, offering a robust analysis that can inform policymakers and advocates
seeking to improve worker rights.
Additionally, incorporating the protection of rights into the research design can foster the
collection of rich qualitative data through interviews and focus groups, capturing the lived
experiences of gig workers. This qualitative aspect can complement quantitative data,
providing a holistic view of the issues at hand. Moreover, the findings from such research are
likely to inform actionable policy recommendations. By highlighting the consequences of
inadequate protections, the study can motivate stakeholders—such as government entities,
labor organizations, and gig platforms—to take concrete steps toward enhancing gig workers'
rights and protections. By raising awareness about the plight of gig workers, the research can
contribute to a broader societal discourse on labor rights, encouraging public support and
advocacy for improved conditions in the gig economy. Overall, focusing on the protection of
gig workers' rights will not only enrich the academic understanding of the gig economy but
also have practical implications for enhancing the rights and lives of gig workers.
CHAPTERIZATION PLAN
The introduction will provide a comprehensive overview of the gig economy, outlining its
rapid growth and significance in today’s labor market. It will highlight the various forms of
18
gig work, such as food delivery, ridesharing, and freelance services, emphasizing how
technological advancements have transformed traditional employment structures. This
section will also touch upon the inherent vulnerabilities gig workers face, including lack of
job security, inconsistent income, and limited access to benefits. By establishing this context,
the introduction will set the stage for discussing the critical need for legal protections and
rights for gig workers.
This chapter will examine the legal frameworks that govern gig work across different
jurisdictions. It will analyze labor laws, regulatory measures, and judicial interpretations that
affect gig workers' rights. By comparing approaches taken by various countries or regions,
this section will illuminate best practices and shortcomings in current legislation. It will also
address the challenges of classifying gig workers—whether as employees, independent
contractors, or something in between—and how these classifications impact their legal
protections and access to benefits.
In this section, the research will present empirical findings gathered from interviews and
surveys conducted with gig workers. This qualitative and quantitative data will provide
firsthand insights into the experiences, perceptions, and needs of gig workers. It will highlight
common themes regarding their struggles, such as financial insecurity, lack of health benefits,
and challenges in navigating disputes with platforms. This chapter will serve to humanize the
statistical data surrounding gig work and illustrate the real-life implications of existing labor
rights issues.
This chapter will comprehensively discuss the multifaceted challenges gig workers face,
focusing on labor rights issues and the economic impacts of gig work. It will explore how the
19
absence of legal protections leaves gig workers vulnerable to exploitation, unfair treatment,
and economic instability. The discussion will also consider broader economic implications,
such as how gig work affects local economies, worker mobility, and income inequality. By
outlining these challenges, this section will emphasize the urgent need for systemic changes
to protect gig workers' rights.
This section will propose actionable policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the rights
and protections of gig workers. Recommendations may include legislative changes to
redefine gig worker classifications, establish minimum wage standards, and ensure access to
benefits such as health insurance and paid leave. The chapter will also advocate for the
creation of worker advocacy groups and the implementation of platform accountability
measures. By providing a roadmap for improvement, this section will focus on practical
solutions that can be adopted by policymakers and industry stakeholders.
The conclusion will summarize the key findings from the research, reiterating the critical
need for improved protections for gig workers. It will reflect on the importance of balancing
flexibility with rights and the role of legislation in achieving this balance. Additionally, the
conclusion will identify areas for further research, encouraging ongoing dialogue and
investigation into the evolving nature of gig work and its implications for labor rights. This
final section will aim to inspire action among stakeholders and underscore the necessity of a
collective effort to support gig workers in securing their rights.
20