Afrikaans Poe 2022
Afrikaans Poe 2022
Afrikaans Poe 2022
This essay will discuss the role of Krashen theory in the FAL acquisition and the
implications of Krashen’s views for the teaching of a first additional language. It will
also go into details of the Swain theory in the FAL acquisitions and its implications
for teaching of the first additional language. It will also include examples to support
statements or facts that will be stated below and my opinion of who I agree with
between the two theories and why.
Stephen Krashen is an expert in the field of linguistics, specializing in theories of
language acquisition and development (Schutz, 2019). According to Krashen’s
theory acquisition is a subconscious process of accepting knowledge where
information is stored in the brain through communication and associating with other
people whereas learning is the conscious acceptance of knowledge. Krashen then
goes to state that learned competence and acquired competences develops in
different ways (Tricomi, 1986). Language learning in his opinion occurs through the
formal study of rules, patterns and conventions, a study that allows one to talk about
and consciously apply the knowledge gained. Language acquisition on the other
hand occurs quite differently (Tricomi, 1986). Krashen believes that development
occurs through “comprehensible input”. However not all inputs will produce “intake”
according S. Krashen (1985). The word “intake” is closely linked to how affective
factors affect second language acquisition. An example of a practical scenario of the
Krashen theory, when a child is born into a Xhosa and Sepedi speaking home and
both the parent communicate with the child with both languages therefore she or he
acquired both Xhosa and Sepedi at an early age and then she goes on into school
and does English as FAL years later she will be fluent in the English. This show that
children are better language learners as the example state that she was exposed to
these languages at an early stage.
Krashen’s theory consists of five hypotheses of the second language acquisition
which are acquisition learning hypothesis, monitor hypothesis, natural order
hypothesis, input hypothesis, affective filter hypothesis. The acquisition of learning is
the first and important of the five hypotheses in this theory. It is also the most well-
known among linguists and language teachers. According to Krashen the monitor
hypothesis states that the learner is consciously learning the rules and function of
the language rather than its meaning. The natural order hypothesis shows us that
learners learn grammatical structures of a language in a fixed and universal way
(Almaden, 2022). The input hypothesis has a huge emphasizes on the acquisition of
the second language. This hypothesis focuses more on how the language is
acquired rather than being learned (Almaden, 2022). There is the affective filter of
the language acquisition which deals or can be affected by emotional variables such
as low self-confident, anxiety, stress and many more. According to Krashen learners
who are affected by these emotional variables for example, high stress levels, high
anxiety, no self-confident and lack of motivation they have it difficult to learn or
acquire a second language, the affective filter causes a mental blockage that
prevents comprehensible input (Schutz, 2019).
After the Karshen “input hypothesis” researchers later developed the “output
hypothesis” which was developed by Swain. In those days English teachers focused
more on the “input hypothesis” such as listening and reading and ignored the “output
hypothesis” such as writing and speaking. The Swain’s theory states that is it
through language production (written or spoken) that second language acquisition is
likely to occur. According to Swain it is during the stages of language production that
learners realize what they know and what they do not know. He also states that we
learn best through output because it enables us to identify our “gaps” of what we
want to say and what were able to say. It would be on realizing this “gap” that
learners are pushed and motivated to modify their output in order to learn something
new about the language they are to learn. This hypothesis asserts that language
production enables learners in four different ways according to Swain (1993). The
first one derives from the fact that language production provides learners with great
opportunities for meaningful practice, which allows the development of automatic
linguistic behaviors. The second one is about forcing learners to switch from
semantic mental process to syntactic ones. The third one states that language
production helps learners in acquiring a second language through testing hypothesis
therefor the output hypothesis does give learners the opportunity to test their own
hypothesis and make their own conclusions. The fourth one is almost the same as
the third aspect which deals with another speaker’s responses of the language
especially native ones, which gives learners information on how comprehensible
their utterances are.
The first implications of the Swain’s theory are to raise awareness of the importance
of English writing. We learnt that teachers have not really paid attention to writing
and they were focused on “input aspects”. Therefore, learners who majoring in
English pay more attention to the “output” aspects which indicates the importance of
it. Then there is the second implication which is appropriate feedback is encouraged
in writing class. English assignments are usually completed and returned to the
teacher. During the writing process learners usually act as singers as they think,
write and reread the feedback. They rarely communication to other learners and
teacher also do not give them the opportunity to speak during class.
I agree with the Karshen theory more because I believe that learners learn best
through input aspects such as listening and reading. Leaners will get the opportunity
learn more about the language. I also believe with these input hypothesis learners
get the opportunity to engage more with the language and it easier for them to carry
it on with them. It also gives learners the idea of what they need to know and what
they are struggling with.
The Karshen and Swain’s theory both play a big role in our daily learning lives as we
all need both the input and output hypothesis to successes in acquiring the FAL
languages.
Lesson Plan Template 2021
Note: All lesson plans are to be typed up, no handwritten lesson plans will be accepted for the final
submission of the POE. Please use the template below which will be made available to you in MS
Word format for lesson planning.
Name Nokwanda Student Number ST 10099815
Mpondo
A. Lesson details
Date of lesson 15 May 2022 Subject (CAPS) Afrikaans FAL
Grade 5
Topic Listening and speaking
Number of learners 30
Duration 1 hour
B. CAPS-Specific Focus
through effective listening and speaking:
Learners will collect and synthesise information, construct knowledge, solve
problems and express their ideas and opinions.
Critical listening skills enables learners to recognise values and attitudes
embedded in texts
Build on vocabulary and sentence structures
Build on skills developed in the foundation phase to more proper
conversations, discussions and oral presentation
D. Lesson Objectives
The curriculum/ content covered in Afrikaans FAL is the same as the content
covered in English language they both involve skills of listening and speaking.
Storytelling is also part of English content, where learners are able to re-tell stories
G. Teaching Strategies
LESSON DEVELOPMENT
H. Lesson Steps
Phases Write, in detail, every element/step of your lesson for each phase. Resources
Include time on task for each phase. Required
15 minutes none
INTRODUCTORY
40 minutes Books
LEARNING PHASE