Abdulla 2019 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 388 012081

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

IOP Conference Series: Earth and

Environmental Science

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like


- Properties of superdeformed bands in A <
Bio-degradation of crude oil using local bacterial 100 mass region within the variable
moment of inertia model
isolates Vidya Devi and Jagjit Singh Matharu

- Applications of parametric processes to


high-quality multicolour ultrashort pulses,
To cite this article: K J Abdulla et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 388 012081 pulse cleaning and CEP stable sub-3fs
pulse
Takayoshi Kobayashi, Jun Liu and Kotaro
Okamura

- Orbital Support and Evolution of Flat


View the article online for updates and enhancements. Profiles of Bars (Shoulders)
Leandro Beraldo e Silva, Victor P.
Debattista, Stuart Robert Anderson et al.

This content was downloaded from IP address 194.116.208.110 on 25/06/2024 at 13:11


International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

Bio-degradation of crude oil using local bacterial isolates

K J Abdulla, S A Ali I H Gatea N A Hameed and S K Maied


Environmental Directorate, Ministry of Science and Technology, Baghdad. Iraq
Email: [email protected]

Abstract. Twenty seven hydrocarbon degrading bacterial isolates were isolated from
five hydrocarbon contaminated sites. The study revealed a high efficiency of bacteria
adapted to the biodegradation of hydrocarbons (petroleum) isolated from soil
contaminated with oil residues. The isolates were examined for their hydrocarbon
degradation in media supplemented with crude oil at five different concentrations 2%
3% 5%, 7% and 10% incubated for 5 different time intervals 5, 10 ,15 ,20 , and 30
days. The results indicated that all the isolates possessed potential to degrade the wide
variety of hydrocarbons. The most efficient among them was SD1 which degraded
most tested hydrocarbon (98%) showing maximum growth at 3.3 gm /l of biomass
concentration and 15 days incubation. SD1 isolate was identified on the basis of
morphological and biochemical characteristics and confirmed with 16s rRNA
sequencing. GCMS Analysis showed significant differences in the composition of
hydrocarbons in Crude oil.It could be concluded that native flora of hydrocarbon
contaminated site adapt to the environmental condition and could be implicated to
remove hydrocarbons.

1. Introduction
Petroleum hydrocarbons are the most widespread contaminants within the marine environment.
Pollution by hydrocarbons in marine environments may be the consequence of various natural (natural
seepages) and/or anthropogenic activities (discharge during tanks and/or ships transportation and/or
pipeline failures) as well as the chronic pollution (ships, harbours, oil terminals, freshwater run-off,
rivers and sewage) [1] .
The "fate" of petroleum in the sea water largely depends on mechanical (wave, wind), physical
(temperature, UV) and chemical (pH, dissolved oxygen and nutrient concentration) factors which may
differently influence its natural transformation (oil weathering) and bio-degradation [2]. On the above
mentioned basis, bioremediation techniques have been developed and improved for cleaning up oil-
polluted marine environments as an alternative to chemical and physical techniques [3]. As reported in
different studies, a wide variety of marine bacteria are known to degrade petroleum hydrocarbons, and
those, distributed over several (sub) phyla (α-, β-, and γ-Proteobacteria; Bacteroidetes / Chlorobi
group) have been described so far [4;5]. Genera Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus,
Bacillus, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter and Serratia; also, some colonies resembled
Actinomycetes. Besides being typical soil microorganisms, all the genera have been reported to be
present in hydrocarbon-contaminated sites, and have also been reported as hydrocarbon degraders [6;

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

7].
Hydrocarbon molecules that are released into the environment are hard to remove, since they adsorb to
surfaces and are trapped by capillarity in a water-immiscible phase. Bioremediation has proven to be
an alternative to diminish the effects caused by hydrocarbon contamination of soil and water, using the
metabolic capacities of microorganisms that can use hydrocarbons as source of carbon and energy, or
that can modify them by cometabolism. The efficiency of removal is directly related to the
compounds' chemical structure, to its bioavailabity (concentration, toxicity, mobility and access) and
to the physicochemical conditions present in the environment [8]. Bioremediation can be described as
the conversion of pollutants (hydrocarbons) by micro-organisms (bacteria) into energy, cell mass and
biological waste products [9]. It is also necessary to study the microbial degradation of crude oil as an
environmentally friendly way of cleaning up oil-polluted areas.

2. Material and methods


2.1. Oil sample
Crude oil samples were obtained from Doura refinery in Baghdad

2.2. Soil sample


Samples were collected randomly from soil surface which heavily contaminated with oil,
(automobile workshop and electric generators), at a depth of 5cm, in sterile bags and tightly packed,
then carefully transferred to the laboratory and stored at 4°C. They were used to isolate the bacteria.

2.3. Isolation of bacteria


Isolation of bacteria were performed by soil dilution, one gram of dried soil was dissolved in 9ml of
distilled water , aqueous dilutions, of the suspension were applied in nutrient agar , the plates were
incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. Different isolates were carried out then selected colonies of bacteria
were transferred from mixed culture plates onto respective agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 24hrs
plates containing pure cultures were stored at 4°C until the examination [2].

2.4. Preparation of Inocula.


Inocula of 0.1 mL aliquots of four overnight nutrient broth cultures for each strain individually and 1
for mixed consortium) was washed twice in physiological saline solution (0.87% NaCl, pH 7.2) and
suspended in the same to optical density of 0.1 (OD600) (2).

2.5. Primary screening for oil degradation


The individual from overnight culture at the log phase of growth were transferred to 250 mL conical
flasks, each containing 50mL of sterile mineral salts medium (table 1) with (0.2% v/v) crude oil [7].
The experiment was carried out in duplicate and uninoculated flasks constituted the controls,
accounting for abiotic losses. All flasks were incubated at 30°C for seven day. Residual concentrations
of crude oil were determined by gas chromatography.[5].
Table1. Mineral salt medium
Minerals g/l
NaCl 1.0
CaCl2 0.02
KH2PO4 1.0
K2HPO4 1.0
NH3NO2 1.0
FeCl3 0.002
MnSO4.2H2O 0.002
Yeast extract 1.0

2
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

2.6. Identification of bacterial isolates


The colony characteristics and cellular morphology of the isolated, their pigmentation, staining
reactions, were done.

2.7. Isolation of DNA


A wizard genomic Dna extraction kit (promega) used.

2.8. Amplification of 16S rRNA gene


Amplification of 16S rRNA gene was performed using GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, USA)
according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The synthesized primers were used for
amplification. Temperature–time profile of PCR was the following:
30 cycles of 95 °C for 0.5 min, 65 °C for 2 min and 72 °C for 2 min, all steps at maximal ramp rate
(approximately 3 °C s–1 in heating mode and 1.5 °C s–1 in cooling mode).
Analysis of PCR products was performed using electrophoresis in 2% gel, containing ethidium
bromide. A marker contains DNA fragments of known size were used to know the expected product
size. Then gel was visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light

2.9. 16S rRNA gene sequences


DNA coding for 16S RNA was PCR amplified by using chromosomal DNA as a template and
oligonucleotides Ribo‐ For (5′AGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG‐ 3′; and Ribo‐ Rev
(5′CCTACGTATTACCGCGGC‐ 3′. Those two oligonucleotides were designed to amplify a 540 bp
DNA fragment. The nucleotide sequences were used for the analysis of sequence similarity through
Blast (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/Blast.cgi). The percentage differences of the resultant partial 16S
rRNA gene sequences among different species in the same group/genus of species were determined by
pairwise alignment using MEGA 6 [10].

2.10. Oil Degradation


For examining the oil degradation, mineral salt medium was used one about 50ml medium was
dispended in 250ml conical flasks. The media was inoculated with bacteria and incubated at 30°C for
27 days in shaking incubator at 150 rpm.

2.11. Biomass estimation


For biomass estimation after incubation period dry weight method used ,centrifuge at 4000 rpm for
30 min to precipitate the cells, extracted by acetone and hexane mixture 3:1 then dried at 105 °C for
24 hrs, biomass weighted [11].
Removal percentage estimation
Removal percentage was estimated by use equation
( ) ( )
( )
[12].

2.12. DCPIP method for assessing the potential of bacteria


Efficacy of oil degrading bacteria was assessed using DCPIP technique. The mixture of 0.1 ml of
microbial culture, 3 ml BH medium containing oil sample and 0.3ml of DCPIP was incubated at 30°C.
Bacteria capable of altering the oil components produce electrons which can take part in oxidation and
reduction reactions. The oxidized (blue) and reduced (colourless) conditions of DCPIP will help in
identifying the activity of oil degrading microbes [12]. Change in colour was observed at 660 nm
against uninoculated blank tube periodically to assess the potential of consortia.

2.13. Crude oil extraction from test flask


Cells and crude oil was centrifuged at a speed of 5000 rpm for 35 min such that the biomass settled at
the bottom and the supernatant aqueous phase containing bulk of the oil separated biomass pellet was
extracted by adding 2 ml of hexane.

3
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

2.14. Crude oil extraction from control flask


Flask containing 50ml medium with 2% crude oil was acidified with HCL. Equal volume of hexane
was added and flask was placed on shaker at 120 rpm for 20 min. This solution was then transferred in
separating funnel, mixed well and then the aqueous the hexane phases were allowed to separate. The
lower layer of H2O was drained and the extractionwas repeated with 10 ml of solvent at 72°C.

2.15. Gas Chromatography


The analysis of oil degradation were done using gas chromatography (Dani) equipped with flame
ionization detector (GC-FID). The carrier gas was nitrogen and the column used for separation was
DN5 column, three m long and 0.23mm diameter. The operating conditions were as follows: initial
oven temperature 100°C for 0.5 min and temperature ramp at a rate of 10°C min−1 to a final
temperature of 280 °C. The injector temperature was 250 °C; the FID detector was at 320 °C; the flow
rate was 1 ml/min. This method was modified from [13; 14] .

3. Results and Discussion


3.1. Isolation and Screening of Hydrocarbons-Degrading Microorganisms
To isolate different hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, enrichment culture methods were used according
to protocol described in Material and Methods. The enrichment procedure for obtaining contaminated
soil hydrocarbon-degrading microbes was performed in multiple cycles to ensure that the microbes
which were obtained at the end of the enrichment cycle were capable of utilizing the petroleum
compounds rather than just tolerating it. Twenty seven bacterial isolates were isolated from
enrichment cultures that were established at 30°C for 4 weeks. Five of the isolated strains that showed
higher growth rate on crude oil were selected from the twenty seven isolates for further study. These
isolates showed a varying degradation profile for the total petroleum hydrocarbon [TPH] of the
petroleum contaminated soil. In our present work, we report that SD1 isolate could efficiently degrade
total petroleum hydrocarbon removal about 98.245%, over a period of 14 days with 3.3 g\l as dry
weight ( Fig 1 and 2). According to many authors, bacteria have been described as being more
efficient hydrocarbon degraders than other microorganisms or at least that bacteria are more
commonly used as a test microorganism [4; 15]. Many other investigators have reported the
involvement of bacteria and yeast in crude oil biodegradation [7; 8]. On the contrary, there is scanty
information that bacteria are better hydrocarbon degraders than others [11; 12].For that reason, growth
ability of selected strain (SD1) was tested in an enrichment liquid medium.

.
Figure 1. Biomass measurement of active isolate

4
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

Figure 2. Hydrocarbons removal of active Bacillus isolates.

The 2.6-DCPIP screening test was used to detect the hydrocarbon-degrading properties of the
bacteria. All the five selected isolated found to have hydrocarbon-degrading capability by the 2.6-
DCPIP assay. SD1 isolate exhibited the highest hydrocarbon-degrading ability (Fig 3).

Figure 3. Estimation of hydrocarbon-degrading ability of soil bacterial isolates using the 2, 6-DCPIP
assay
Morphological characteristics: Isolated bacterial colony was white, the shape of the cell was
bacillus and gram staining was positive. Sequence comparison demonstrated the affiliation of the
strain SD1 to Bacillus cereus (Fig. 4). The naturally present microorganisms in the soil were capable
of degrading the pollutant as much as the samples enriched with Bacillus. Several studies have
reported on the roles of Bacillus cereus more tolerant to high level of hydrocarbon in soil due to their

5
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

resistance endospore [16]. 17] showed that of 73 aerobic bacteria ability to degraded petroleum
hydrocarbon.

Figure 4. Agarose gel electrophoresis analysis of PCR reaction for DNA extracted from pure culture
of SD1 strain.
For confirmation of hydrocarbon degrading activity in MSM GC-MS analysis of control (oil)
(without bacteria) was done which showed it was a mixture of different hydrocarbons and further it
was compared with GCMS results of oil extracts from inoculated medium . The evaluation of the oil
biodegradation by SD1 strain was carried out during the process of 14 days using gas chromatography
with mass spectrometry GC/MS. After 14 days of incubation, the undegraded oil hydrocarbon residue
was extracted twice with equal volumes of hexane. The results showed appearance of new compounds
through bio-degradation with less molecular weight and less complex such as carboxylic acids and
alcohols.

Table 2. Major molecular fragmentation of crude oil compounds before degradation


Retention time(min) Compound Formula

2.567 3-Methyl-3-pentanol C6H14O


4.758 2-Nitrohexane C6H13NO2
5.808 Cyclopentane, 1-acetyl-1,2- C7H10O2
epoxy-
9.692 2-Methylundecane C12H26
11.217 4,8-Dimethyltridecane C15H32
12.342 3-Ethyl-2,7-dimethyloctane C12H26
14.008 4,8-Dimethyltridecane C15H32
15.277 2-Methylnonadecane :C20H42
20.733 2-Methyleicosane C21H44
21.677 5-Butylnonane C13H28
22.583 9-Octylheptadecane C25H52

6
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

Oil containing n-alkanes, branched alkanes, and small concentrations of aromatic polycyclic
compounds. DS1 isolate was able of utilizing a wide range of hydrocarbons, with a preference for
alkanes with intermediate carbon chain lengths as shown in ( table 1and 2).
Bacterial micro flora was found actively able to degrade total mixture of hydrocarbons present in oil
contaminated soil samples collected from motor workshop area[18]. The result was confirmed by
almost total disappearance of the corresponding peak of each compound. It is expected that the
hydrocarbon assimilating capabilities in the liquid medium is due to adaptation of isolate due to
previous exposure to hydrocarbons. It may indicate the ability of the emulsification of hydrocarbons,
which is a major factor for hydrocarbon uptake and assimilation.
Table 3. The major molecular fragmentation of crude oil compounds after degradation
Retention time(min) Compound Formula
3.017 1-Hydroxy-1 methylcyclopentane C6H12O
3.292 Acetic acid, isobutyl ester C6H12O2
4.775 -Nitrohexane C6H13NO2
5.417 2-Hexanecarboxylic acid C7H14O2
5.817 rans-4,4-Dimethyl-2-Pentene C7H14
5.983 4-Methyl-3-pentenoic acid C6H10O2
8.533 alpha.-Hydroxyisobutanoic acid C4H8O3
18.717 n-Eicosane C20H42

4. Conclusions
Our study focused on bacterial isolate isolated from oil contaminated soil from Al –Dora petroleum
refinery, identified as Bacillus cereus. A direct relationship was found between both cell growth of the
bacterial isolate and crude oil biodegradation. These strains have high levels of crude oil degradation
and sufficient growth on mineral medium supplemented with hydrocarbons. In this study, the isolated
bacteria have been shown to degrade a wide range of hydrocarbons and completely metabolize n-
alkanes. From the data presented in this study, it can be concluded that the investigated strain Bacillus
cereus could be considered as good prospects for their application in bioremediation of hydrocarbon
contaminated environment and improvement of hydrocarbon removing treatment of contaminated soil.

5. Acknowledgments
Sincere thanks and heartfelt gratitude goes to all who in diverse ways contributed to the success of this
work.

References
[1] K. A. Kvenvolden and C. K. Cooper, 2003 “Natural seepage of crude oil into the marine
environment,” Geo-Marine Letters, 23 (3-4) pp. 140–146,
[2] Nikolopoulou M, Kalogerakis N. 2010 Biostimulation strategies for enhanced bioremediation of
marine oil spills including chronic pollution. In: Timmis KN, editor. Handbook of
hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: pp. 2521–2529.
[3] Alkatib MA, Alam MDZ, Muyibi SA, et al. 2011 An isolated bacterial consortium for crude oil
biodegradation. Afr J Biotechnol.;10:18763–18767.
[4] Cappello S, Denaro R, Genovese M, et al. . 2007 Predominant growth of Alcanivorax during
experiments on "oil spill bioremediation" in mesocosms. Microbiol Res; 162 185–190.
[5] Röling WFM, Milner MG, Martin Jones D, et al. 2004 Bacterial community dynamics and
hydrocarbon degradation during a field-scale evaluation of bioremediation on a mudflat
beach contaminated with buried oil. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70 2603–2613.
[6] Bouchez, M.; Rakatozafy, H.; Marchal, R.; Leveau, J.; Vandecasteele, J. 1999. Diversity of
bacterial strains degrading hexadecane in relation to the mode of substrate uptake. J. Appl.
Microbiol. 86 421-428.

7
International Conference on Agricultural Sciences IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 388 (2019) 012081 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012081

[7] Rahman, K.; Rahman, T.;Korkoutas, Y.; Petsas, I.; Marchant, R.; Banat, I. 2003Enhanced
bioremediation of n - alcane in petroleum sludge using bacterial consortium amended with
rhamnolipid and micronutrients. Bioresour. Technol. 90 159-168.
[8] Christofi, N.; Ivshina, I. 2002. Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil
remediation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 915-929.)
[9] Latha R. and Kalaivani R. (2012) Bacterial Degradation of Crude Oil by Gravimetric Analysis.
Adv. Appl. Sci. Res., 3(5) 2789-2795.
[10] Head, I. M., J. R. Saunders, and R. W. Pickup. 1998. Microbial evolution, diversity, and
ecology: a decade of ribosomal RNA analysis of uncultivated microorganisms. Microb.
Ecol. 35 1-21.
[11] S.Shahab; I.Shafi and N. Ahmed 2017 Indigenous Oil Degrading Bacteria: Isolation, Screening
and Characterization. National Journal of Health Sciences.2 (3) 100-105.
[12] Venosa, A.D., Zhu, X. 2003. Biodegradation of crude oil contaminating marine shorelines and
freshwater wetlands. Spill Sci.Technol. Bull., 8(2) 163 178.
[13] W. Ahmed, F. S. Alzubaidi and S. J. Hamza 2014 . Biodegradation of Crude Oil in
Contaminated Water by Local Isolates of Enterobacter cloacae Iraqi J.Scie. 55(3A):1025-
1033.
[14] Deswarte, F..E.I.; Clark, J.H.;Hardy:J.J.E.andP.M.Rose, 2006 “The fractionation of valuable
wax products from wheat straw using CO2, GreenChemistry,8(1) 39–42.
[15] Bidoia, E. D., Montagnolli, R. N., & Lopes, P. R. M., “Microbial biodegradation potential of
hydrocarbons evaluated by colorimetric technique: a case study” Current research,
technology and education topics in applied microbiology and microbial biotechnology.
Badajoz, Sp.
[16] Annweiller, E., Richnow, H.H., Grams, C. 2000. Naphthalene degradation and incorporation of
naphthalene derived carbon into biomass by the thermophile bacillus therleovorans. Appl.
Enviro. Microbiol., 66(2) 518 523.
[17] Chosson, P., Lanau, C., Connan, J., Dessort, D. 1991. Biodegradation of refractory
hydrocarbons biomarkers from petroleum under laboratory conditions. Nature, 351 640 642.
[18] Okpokwasili G. C., Amanchukwu S. C. 1988 Petroleum hydrocarbon degradation
by Candida species. Environment International. 14(3):243–247.

You might also like