Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.

gov)

K ∗(892) I (J P ) = 1 −
2 (1 )

K ∗ (892) MASS
CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
891.66± 0.26 OUR AVERAGE
892.6 ± 0.5 5840 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC − 8.25 K − p → K 0 π − p
888 ± 3 NAPIER 84 SPEC + 200 π − p → 2K 0 X
S
891 ±1 NAPIER 84 SPEC − 200 π − p → 2K 0 X
S
891.7 ± 2.1 3700 BARTH 83 HBC + 70 K + p → K 0 π + X
891 ±1 4100 TOAFF 81 HBC − 6.5 K − p → K 0 π − p
892.8 ± 1.6 AJINENKO 80 HBC + 32 K + p → K 0 π + X
890.7 ± 0.9 1800 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC ± 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 π ±
S
886.6 ± 2.4 1225 BALAND 78 HBC ± 12 p p → (K π)± X
891.7 ± 0.6 6706 COOPER 78 HBC ± 0.76 p p → (K π)± X
891.9 ± 0.7 9000 1 PALER 75 HBC − 14.3 K − p → (K π)−
X
892.2 ± 1.5 4404 AGUILAR-... 71B HBC − 3.9,4.6 K − p →
(K π)− p
891 ±2 1000 CRENNELL 69D DBC − 3.9 K − N → K 0 π − X
890 ± 3.0 720 BARLOW 67 HBC ± 1.2 p p → (K 0 π)± K ∓
889 ± 3.0 600 BARLOW 67 HBC ± 1.2 p p → (K 0 π)± K π
891 ± 2.3 620 2 DEBAERE 67B HBC + 3.5 K + p → K 0 π + p
891.0 ± 1.2 1700 3 WOJCICKI 64 HBC − 1.7 K − p → K 0 π − p
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
893.5 ± 1.1 27k 4 ABELE 99D CBAR ± 0.0 p p → K + K − π 0
890.4 ± 0.2 ± 0.5 80± 0.8k 5 BIRD 89 LASS − 11 K − p → K 0 π − p
890.0 ± 2.3 800 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 30 K + p → K 0 π + p
S
896.0 ± 1.1 3200 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 50 K + p → K 0 π + p
S
893 ±1 3600 2,3 CLELAND 82 SPEC − 50 K + p → K 0 π − p
S
896.0 ± 1.9 380 DELFOSSE 81 SPEC + 50 K ± p → K ± π 0 p
886.0 ± 2.3 187 DELFOSSE 81 SPEC − 50 K ± p → K ± π 0 p
894.2 ± 2.0 765 2 CLARK 73 HBC − 3.13 K − p → K 0 π − p
894.3 ± 1.5 1150 2,3 CLARK 73 HBC − 3.3 K − p → K 0 π − p
892.0 ± 2.6 341 2 SCHWEING...68 HBC − 5.5 K − p → K 0 π − p

CHARGED ONLY, PRODUCED IN τ LEPTON DECAYS

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT
895.47± 0.20 ± 0.74 53k 6 EPIFANOV 07 τ − → K 0 π − ντ
BELL
S
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
892.0 ± 0.5 7 BOITO 10 RVUE τ − → K 0 π − ντ
S
892.0 ± 0.9 8,9 BOITO 09 RVUE τ − → K 0 −
S π ντ
895.3 ± 0.2 8,10 JAMIN 08 RVUE τ − → K 0 π − ντ
S
896.4 ± 0.9 11970 11 BONVICINI 02 CLEO τ − → K − π 0 ντ
895 ± 2 12 BARATE 99R ALEP τ − → K − π 0 ντ

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 1 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

NEUTRAL ONLY
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT
895.81± 0.19 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 1.4. See the ideogram below.
895.4 ± 0.2 ± 0.2 243k 13 DEL-AMO-SA...11I BABR D + → K − π + e + ν
e
895.7 ± 0.2 ± 0.3 141k 14 BONVICINI 08A CLEO D + → K − π + π +
+ 0.35 18k
895.41± 0.32 − 15 LINK 05I FOCS D + → K − π + µ+ νµ
0.43
896 ± 2 BARBERIS 98E OMEG 450 p p → pf ps K ∗ K ∗
895.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.2 ASTON 88 LASS 11 K − p → K − π + n
894.52± 0.63 25k 1 ATKINSON 86 OMEG 20–70 γ p
894.63± 0.76 20k 1 ATKINSON 86 OMEG 20–70 γ p
897 ± 1 28k EVANGELIS... 80 OMEG 10 π − p → K + π − (Λ , Σ )
898.4 ± 1.4 1180 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 π ±
S
894.9 ± 1.6 WICKLUND 78 ASPK 3,4,6 K ± N → (K π)0 N
897.6 ± 0.9 BOWLER 77 DBC 5.4 K + d → K + π − p p
895.5 ± 1.0 3600 MCCUBBIN 75 HBC 3.6 K − p → K − π + n
897.1 ± 0.7 22k 1 PALER 75 HBC 14.3 K − p → (K π)0 X
896.0 ± 0.6 10k FOX 74 RVUE 2 K − p → K − π + n
896.0 ± 0.6 FOX 74 RVUE 2 K + n → K + π − p
896 ± 2 16 MATISON 74 HBC 12 K + p → K + π − ∆
896 ± 1 3186 LEWIS 73 HBC 2.1–2.7 K + p → K π π p
894.0 ± 1.3 16 LINGLIN 73 HBC 2–13 K + p →
K + π− π+ p
898.4 ± 1.3 1700 2 BUCHNER 72 DBC 4.6 K + n → K + π − p
897.9 ± 1.1 2934 2 AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 3.9,4.6 K − p → K − π + n
898.0 ± 0.7 5362 2 AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 3.9,4.6 K − p →
K − π+ π− p
895 ± 1 4300 3 HABER 70 DBC 3 K − N → K − π+ X
893.7 ± 2.0 10k DAVIS 69 HBC 12 K + p → K + π − π + p
894.7 ± 1.4 1040 2 DAUBER 67B HBC 2.0 K − p → K − π + π − p
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
894.9 ± 0.5 ± 0.7 14.4k 17 MITCHELL 09A CLEO D + → K + K − π +
s
896.2 ± 0.3 20k 8 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e − →
K ∗0 K ± π ∓ γ
900.7 ± 1.1 5900 BARTH 83 HBC 70 K + p → K + π − X

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 2 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
895.81±0.19 (Error scaled by 1.4)

χ
2

DEL-AMO-SA... 11I BABR 2.1

BONVICINI 08A CLEO 0.1
LINK 05I FOCS 0.7
BARBERIS 98E OMEG 0.0
ASTON 88 LASS 0.0
ATKINSON 86 OMEG 4.2
ATKINSON 86 OMEG 2.4
EVANGELIS... 80 OMEG 1.4
AGUILAR-... 78B HBC 3.4
WICKLUND 78 ASPK 0.3
BOWLER 77 DBC 4.0
MCCUBBIN 75 HBC 0.1
PALER 75 HBC 3.4
FOX 74 RVUE 0.1
FOX 74 RVUE 0.1
MATISON 74 HBC 0.0
LEWIS 73 HBC 0.0
LINGLIN 73 HBC 1.9
BUCHNER 72 DBC 4.0
AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 3.6
AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 9.8
HABER 70 DBC 0.7
DAVIS 69 HBC 1.1
DAUBER 67B HBC 0.6
44.1
(Confidence Level = 0.0051)

890 892 894 896 898 900 902 904

K ∗ (892)0 mass (MeV)

1 Inclusive reaction. Complicated background and phase-space effects.
√
2 Mass errors enlarged by us to Γ/ N. See note.
3 Number of events in peak reevaluated by us.
4 K-matrix pole.
5 From a partial wave amplitude analysis.
6 From a fit in the K ∗ (800) + K ∗ (892) + K ∗ (1410) model.
0
7 From the pole position of the K π vector form factor using EPIFANOV 07 and constraints
from Kl3 decays in ANTONELLI 10.
8 Systematic uncertainties not estimated.
9 From the pole position of the K π vector form factor in the complex s-plane and using
EPIFANOV 07 data.
10 Reanalysis of EPIFANOV 07 using resonance chiral theory.
11 Calculated by us from the shift by 4.7 ± 0.9 MeV (statistical uncertainty only) reported
in BONVICINI 02 with respect to the world average value from PDG 00.
12 With mass and width of the K ∗ (1410) fixed at 1412 MeV and 227 MeV, respectively.
13 Taking into account the K ∗ (892)0 , S-wave and P-wave (K ∗ (1410)0 ).
14 From the isobar model with a complex pole for the κ.
15 Fit to K π mass spectrum includes a non-resonant scalar component.
16 From pole extrapolation.
17 This value comes from a fit with χ2 of 178/117.

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 3 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

A REVIEW GOES HERE – Check our WWW List of Reviews

m K ∗ (892)0 − m K ∗ (892)±

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT

6.7± 1.2 OUR AVERAGE
7.7± 1.7 2980 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC ±0 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 π ±
S
5.7± 1.7 7338 AGUILAR-... 71B HBC −0 3.9,4.6 K − p
6.3± 4.1 283 18 BARASH 67B HBC 0.0 p p
18 Number of events in peak reevaluated by us.

K ∗ (892) RANGE PARAMETER

All from partial wave amplitude analyses.

VALUE (GeV− 1 ) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT

2.1 ± 0.5 ± 0.5 243k 19 DEL-AMO-SA...
11I
BABR 0 D + → K − π + e + νe
+ 1.31
3.96± 0.54 − 18k 20 LINK 05I FOCS 0 D + → K − π + µ+ ν µ
0.90
3.4 ± 0.7 ASTON 88 LASS 0 11 K − p → K − π + n
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
12.1 ± 3.2 ± 3.0 BIRD 89 LASS − 11 K − p → K 0 π − p
19 Taking into account the K ∗ (892)0 , S-wave and P-wave (K ∗ (1410)0 ).
20 Fit to K π mass spectrum includes a non-resonant scalar component.

K ∗ (892) WIDTH
CHARGED ONLY, HADROPRODUCED
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
50.8± 0.9 OUR FIT
50.8± 0.9 OUR AVERAGE
49 ± 2 5840 BAUBILLIER 84B HBC − 8.25 K − p → K 0 π − p
56 ± 4 NAPIER 84 SPEC − 200 π − p → 2K 0 X
S
51 ± 2 4100 TOAFF 81 HBC − 6.5 K − p → K 0 π − p
50.5± 5.6 AJINENKO 80 HBC + 32 K + p → K 0 π + X
45.8± 3.6 1800 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC ± 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 π ±
S
52.0± 2.5 6706 21 COOPER 78 HBC ± 0.76 p p → (K π)± X
52.1± 2.2 9000 22 PALER 75 HBC − 14.3 K − p → (K π)−
X
46.3± 6.7 765 21 CLARK 73 HBC − 3.13 K − p → K 0 π − p
48.2± 5.7 1150 21,23 CLARK 73 HBC − 3.3 K − p → K 0 π − p
54.3± 3.3 4404 21 AGUILAR-... 71B HBC − 3.9,4.6 K − p →
(K π)− p
46 ± 5 1700 21,23 WOJCICKI 64 HBC − 1.7 K − p → K 0 π − p

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 4 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
54.8± 1.7 27k 24 ABELE 99D CBAR ± 0.0 p p → K + K − π 0
45.2± 1 ± 2 79.7± 0.8k 25 BIRD 89 LASS − 11 K − p → K 0 π − p
42.8± 7.1 3700 BARTH 83 HBC + 70 K + p → K 0 π + X
64.0± 9.2 800 21,23 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 30 K + p → K 0 π + p
S
62.0± 4.4 3200 21,23 CLELAND 82 SPEC + 50 K + p → K 0 π + p
S
55 ± 4 3600 21,23 CLELAND 82 SPEC − 50 K + p → K 0 π − p
S
62.6± 3.8 380 DELFOSSE 81 SPEC + 50 K ± p → K ± π 0 p
50.5± 3.9 187 DELFOSSE 81 SPEC − 50 K ± p → K ± π 0 p

CHARGED ONLY, PRODUCED IN τ LEPTON DECAYS

VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT
46.2± 0.6
0.6±± 1.2 53k 26 EPIFANOV 07τ − → K 0 π − ντ
BELL
S
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
46.5± 1.1 27 BOITO 10 RVUE τ − → K 0 π − ντ
S
46.2± 0.4 28,29 BOITO 09 RVUE τ − → K 0 π − ντ
S
47.5± 0.4 28,30 JAMIN 08 RVUE τ − → K 0 π − ντ
S
55 ± 8 31 BARATE 99R ALEP τ − → K − π 0 ντ

NEUTRAL ONLY
VALUE (MeV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN COMMENT
47.4 ± 0.6 OUR FIT Error includes scale factor of 2.2.
47.4 ± 0.6 OUR AVERAGE Error includes scale factor of 2.0. See the ideogram below.
46.5 ± 0.3 ± 0.2 243k 32 DEL-AMO-SA...11I BABR D + → K − π + e + ν
e
45.3 ± 0.5 ± 0.6 141k 33 BONVICINI 08A CLEO D + → K − π + π +
+ 1.32
47.79± 0.86 − 18k 34 LINK 05ID + → K − π + µ+ ν µ
FOCS
1.06
54 ±3 BARBERIS 98E OMEG 450 p p → pf ps K ∗ K ∗
50.8 ± 0.8 ± 0.9 ASTON 88 LASS 11 K − p → K − π + n
46.5 ± 4.3 5900 BARTH 83 HBC 70 K + p → K + π − X
54 ±2 28k EVANGELIS... 80 OMEG 10 π − p → K + π − (Λ , Σ )
45.9 ± 4.8 1180 AGUILAR-... 78B HBC 0.76 p p → K ∓ K 0 π ±
S
51.2 ± 1.7 WICKLUND 78 ASPK 3,4,6 K ± N → (K π)0 N
48.9 ± 2.5 BOWLER 77 DBC 5.4 K + d → K + π − p p
48 + −2
3 3600 MCCUBBIN 75 HBC 3.6 K − p → K − π + n
50.6 ± 2.5 22k 22 PALER 75 HBC 14.3 K − p → (K π)0 X
47 ± 2 10k FOX 74 RVUE 2 K − p → K − π + n
51 ± 2 FOX 74 RVUE 2 K + n → K + π − p
46.0 ± 3.3 3186 21 LEWIS 73 HBC 2.1–2.7 K + p → K π π p
51.4 ± 5.0 1700 21 BUCHNER 72 DBC 4.6 K + n → K + π − p
+ 4.2
55.8 − 2934 21 AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 3.9,4.6 K − p → K − π + n
3.4
48.5 ± 2.7 5362 AGUILAR-... 3.9,4.6 K − p →
71B HBC
K − π+ π− p
54.0 ± 3.3 4300 21,23 HABER 70 DBC 3 K − N → K − π+ X
53.2 ± 2.1 10k 21 DAVIS 69 HBC 12 K + p → K + π − π + p
44 ± 5.5 1040 21 DAUBER 67B HBC 2.0 K − p → K − π + π − p
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 5 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

45.7 ± 1.1 ± 0.5 14.4k 35 MITCHELL 09A CLEO D + → K + K − π +

s
50.6 ± 0.9 20k 28 AUBERT 07AK BABR 10.6 e + e − →
K ∗0 K ± π ∓ γ

WEIGHTED AVERAGE
47.4±0.6 (Error scaled by 2.0)

Values above of weighted average, error,

and scale factor are based upon the data in
this ideogram only. They are not neces-
sarily the same as our ‘best’ values,
obtained from a least-squares constrained fit
utilizing measurements of other (related)
quantities as additional information.

χ
2

DEL-AMO-SA... 11I BABR 6.4

BONVICINI 08A CLEO 7.3
LINK 05I FOCS 0.1
BARBERIS 98E OMEG 4.8
ASTON 88 LASS 7.9
BARTH 83 HBC
EVANGELIS... 80 OMEG 10.9
AGUILAR-... 78B HBC
WICKLUND 78 ASPK 5.0
BOWLER 77 DBC 0.3
MCCUBBIN 75 HBC 0.1
PALER 75 HBC 1.6
FOX 74 RVUE 0.0
FOX 74 RVUE 3.2
LEWIS 73 HBC 0.2
BUCHNER 72 DBC
AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 6.1
AGUILAR-... 71B HBC 0.2
HABER 70 DBC 4.0
DAVIS 69 HBC 7.6
DAUBER 67B HBC
65.7
(Confidence Level < 0.0001)

40 45 50 55 60 65

NEUTRAL ONLY (MeV)

√
21 Width errors enlarged by us to 4 × Γ/ N; see note.
22 Inclusive reaction. Complicated background and phase-space effects.
23 Number of events in peak reevaluated by us.
24 K-matrix pole.
25 From a partial wave amplitude analysis.
26 From a fit in the K ∗ (800) + K ∗ (892) + K ∗ (1410) model.
0
27 From the pole position of the K π vector form factor using EPIFANOV 07 and constraints
from Kl3 decays in ANTONELLI 10.
28 Systematic uncertainties not estimated.
29 From the pole position of the K π vector form factor in the complex s-plane and using
EPIFANOV 07 data.
30 Reanalysis of EPIFANOV 07 using resonance chiral theory.

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 6 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

31 With mass and width of the K ∗ (1410) fixed at 1412 MeV and 227 MeV, respectively.
32 Taking into account the K ∗ (892)0 , S-wave and P-wave (K ∗ (1410)0 ).
33 From the isobar model with a complex pole for the κ.
34 Fit to K π mass spectrum includes a non-resonant scalar component.
35 This value comes from a fit with χ2 of 178/117.

K ∗ (892) DECAY MODES

Mode Fraction (Γi /Γ) Confidence level

Γ1 Kπ ∼ 100 %
Γ2 ( K π )± ( 99.901± 0.009) %
Γ3 ( K π )0 ( 99.754± 0.021) %
Γ4 0
K γ ( 2.46 ± 0.21 ) × 10−3
Γ5 K±γ ( 9.9 ± 0.9 ) × 10−4
Γ6 K ππ < 7 × 10−4 95%

CONSTRAINED FIT INFORMATION

An overall fit to the total width and a partial width uses 13 mea-
surements and one constraint to determine 3 parameters. The
overall fit has a χ2 = 7.8 for 11 degrees of freedom.

The following
D E off-diagonal array elements are the correlation coefficients
δpi δpj /(δpi ·δpj ), in percent, from the fit to parameters pi , including the branch-
ing fractions, xi ≡ Γi /Γtotal . The fit constrains the xi whose labels appear in this
array to sum to one.

x5 −100
Γ 19 −19
x2 x5

Mode Rate (MeV)

Γ2 ( K π )± 50.7 ± 0.9
Γ5 K±γ 0.050± 0.005

CONSTRAINED FIT INFORMATION

An overall fit to the total width and a partial width uses 22 mea-
surements and one constraint to determine 3 parameters. The
overall fit has a χ2 = 66.8 for 20 degrees of freedom.

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 7 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

The following
D E off-diagonal array elements are the correlation coefficients
δpi δpj /(δpi ·δpj ), in percent, from the fit to parameters pi , including the branch-
ing fractions, xi ≡ Γi /Γtotal . The fit constrains the xi whose labels appear in this
array to sum to one.

x4 −100
Γ 15 −15
x3 x4

Mode Rate (MeV) Scale factor

Γ3 ( K π )0 47.3 ± 0.6 2.1

Γ4 K0 γ 0.116± 0.010

K ∗ (892) PARTIAL WIDTHS

Γ K0γ
¡ ¢
Γ4
VALUE (keV) EVTS DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
116 ± 10 OUR FIT
116.5± 9.9 584 CARLSMITH 86 SPEC 0 K 0 A → K 0 π0 A
L S

Γ K±γ
¡ ¢
Γ5
VALUE (keV) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
50± 5 OUR FIT
50± 5 OUR AVERAGE
48± 11 BERG 83 SPEC − 156 K − A → K π A
51± 5 CHANDLEE 83 SPEC + 200 K + A → K π A

K ∗ (892) BRANCHING RATIOS

Γ K 0 γ /Γtotal
¡ ¢
Γ4 /Γ
VALUE (units 10−3 ) DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
2.46± 0.21 OUR FIT
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
1.5 ± 0.7 CARITHERS 75B CNTR 0 8–16 K 0 A

Γ K ± γ /Γtotal
¡ ¢
Γ5 /Γ
VALUE (units 10−3 ) CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
0.99± 0.09 OUR FIT
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
<1.6 95 BEMPORAD 73 CNTR + 10–16 K + A

Γ K π π /Γ ( K π )±
¡ ¢ ¡ ¢
Γ6 /Γ2
VALUE CL% DOCUMENT ID TECN CHG COMMENT
< 7 × 10−4 95 JONGEJANS 78 HBC 4 K − p → p K 0 2π
• • • We do not use the following data for averages, fits, limits, etc. • • •
<20 × 10−4 WOJCICKI 64 HBC − 1.7 K − p → K 0 π − p

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 8 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55

 Citation: K.A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014) (URL: http://pdg.lbl.gov)

K ∗ (892) REFERENCES
DEL-AMO-SA... 11I PR D83 072001 P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collab.)
ANTONELLI 10 EPJ C69 399 M. Antonelli et al. (FlaviaNet Working Group)
BOITO 10 JHEP 1009 031 D.R. Boito, R. Escribano, M. Jamin (BARC)
BOITO 09 EPJ C59 821 D.R. Boito, R. Escribano, M. Jamin
MITCHELL 09A PR D79 072008 R.E. Mitchell et al. (CLEO Collab.)
BONVICINI 08A PR D78 052001 G. Bonvicini et al. (CLEO Collab.)
JAMIN 08 PL B664 78 M. Jamin, A. Pich, J. Portoles
AUBERT 07AK PR D76 012008 B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collab.)
EPIFANOV 07 PL B654 65 D. Epifanov et al. (BELLE Collab.)
LINK 05I PL B621 72 J.M. Link et al. (FNAL FOCUS Collab.)
BONVICINI 02 PRL 88 111803 G. Bonvicini et al. (CLEO Collab.)
PDG 00 EPJ C15 1 D.E. Groom et al. (PDG Collab.)
ABELE 99D PL B468 178 A. Abele et al. (Crystal Barrel Collab.)
BARATE 99R EPJ C11 599 R. Barate et al. (ALEPH Collab.)
BARBERIS 98E PL B436 204 D. Barberis et al. (Omega Expt.)
BIRD 89 SLAC-332 P.F. Bird (SLAC)
ASTON 88 NP B296 493 D. Aston et al. (SLAC, NAGO, CINC, INUS)
ATKINSON 86 ZPHY C30 521 M. Atkinson et al. (BONN, CERN, GLAS+)
CARLSMITH 86 PRL 56 18 D. Carlsmith et al. (EFI, SACL)
BAUBILLIER 84B ZPHY C26 37 M. Baubillier et al. (BIRM, CERN, GLAS+)
NAPIER 84 PL 149B 514 A. Napier et al. (TUFTS, ARIZ, FNAL, FLOR+)
BARTH 83 NP B223 296 M. Barth et al. (BRUX, CERN, GENO, MONS+)
BERG 83 Thesis UMI 83-21652 D.M. Berg (ROCH)
CHANDLEE 83 PRL 51 168 C. Chandlee et al. (ROCH, FNAL, MINN)
CLELAND 82 NP B208 189 W.E. Cleland et al. (DURH, GEVA, LAUS+)
DELFOSSE 81 NP B183 349 A. Delfosse et al. (GEVA, LAUS)
TOAFF 81 PR D23 1500 S. Toaff et al. (ANL, KANS)
AJINENKO 80 ZPHY C5 177 I.V. Ajinenko et al. (SERP, BRUX, MONS+)
EVANGELIS... 80 NP B165 383 C. Evangelista et al. (BARI, BONN, CERN+)
AGUILAR-... 78B NP B141 101 M. Aguilar-Benitez et al. (MADR, TATA+)
BALAND 78 NP B140 220 J.F. Baland et al. (MONS, BELG, CERN+)
COOPER 78 NP B136 365 A.M. Cooper et al. (TATA, CERN, CDEF+)
JONGEJANS 78 NP B139 383 B. Jongejans et al. (ZEEM, CERN, NIJM+)
WICKLUND 78 PR D17 1197 A.B. Wicklund et al. (ANL)
BOWLER 77 NP B126 31 M.G. Bowler et al. (OXF)
CARITHERS 75B PRL 35 349 W.C.J. Carithers et al. (ROCH, MCGI)
MCCUBBIN 75 NP B86 13 N.A. McCubbin, L. Lyons (OXF)
PALER 75 NP B96 1 K. Paler et al. (RHEL, SACL, EPOL)
FOX 74 NP B80 403 G.C. Fox, M.L. Griss (CIT)
MATISON 74 PR D9 1872 M.J. Matison et al. (LBL)
BEMPORAD 73 NP B51 1 C. Bemporad et al. (CERN, ETH, LOIC)
CLARK 73 NP B54 432 A.G. Clark, L. Lyons, D. Radojicic (OXF)
LEWIS 73 NP B60 283 P.H. Lewis et al. (LOWC, LOIC, CDEF)
LINGLIN 73 NP B55 408 D. Linglin (CERN)
BUCHNER 72 NP B45 333 K. Buchner et al. (MPIM, CERN, BRUX)
AGUILAR-... 71B PR D4 2583 M. Aguilar-Benitez, R.L. Eisner, J.B. Kinson (BNL)
HABER 70 NP B17 289 B. Haber et al. (REHO, SACL, BGNA, EPOL)
CRENNELL 69D PRL 22 487 D.J. Crennell et al. (BNL)
DAVIS 69 PRL 23 1071 P.J. Davis et al. (LRL)
SCHWEING... 68 PR 166 1317 F. Schweingruber et al. (ANL, NWES)
BARASH 67B PR 156 1399 N. Barash et al. (COLU)
BARLOW 67 NC 50A 701 J. Barlow et al. (CERN, CDEF, IRAD, LIVP)
DAUBER 67B PR 153 1403 P.M. Dauber et al. (UCLA)
DEBAERE 67B NC 51A 401 W. de Baere et al. (BRUX, CERN)
WOJCICKI 64 PR 135 B484 S.G. Wojcicki (LRL)

HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 9 Created: 8/21/2014 12:55