Charice Chapter1-4
Charice Chapter1-4
Charice Chapter1-4
Introduction
anymore; their friendships and social interactions are happening online, too.
There is a need to figure out how all this screen time is shaping the way kids
socialize. It is not just about saying, "too much screen time is bad," but about
finding out the details – what kind of online activities help or hinder their social
skills. It's about making sure the little ones are growing up with the right mix of
adolescents has become central in their social lives, but it elicits mixed
reactions among adults. Concerns have been raised about the potential
urban areas in Canada, with rural communities having lower levels of access.
have also been limited in some regions. These challenges in internet access
argue that children's social skills are declining due to exposure to technology.
The use of the internet by teenagers has been found to reduce the time they
Similarly, internet access in the Philippines has had both positive and
other hand, it has led to less social involvement, more loneliness, and less
communication within the family. Additionally, the Filipino youth have a high
level of digital media usage, which has both positive and negative effects on
family. Overall, internet access has expanded the social circle of children and
contacts, but it has also raised concerns about the depth and quality of these
Locally, Davao City has been the focus of several studies on internet
access and childhood sociability. One study found that female adolescents in
3
(OSAEC) due to poverty and limited mobility caused by the COVID lockdown
study will not only contribute to the academic discourse but also provide
(Malheiro, 2022). Research suggests that the use of online technology can
lives, with many using gadgets with internet access daily. While excessive use
proper supervision and guidance from parents can ensure productive and
5
useful use (Usha et al., 2020). Overall, the impact of internet access on
Studies have shown that the use of the internet by teenagers has reduced the
time they spend engaging in face-to-face communication with their friends and
desire for face-to-face communication with family (Mesch, 2013). Overall, the
literature suggests that internet access can have both positive and negative
exposure to the internet can have an impact on the social skills of children.
creativity and thought process, which can affect their physical and social
behavior (Usha et al., 2020). Additionally, children who use the internet
without guidance and supervision from parents and teachers are more
susceptible to the negative effects of the internet. Young children under the
age of 9 are increasingly engaging with the internet, visiting virtual worlds and
joining social network sites, which may require digital skills they may not
and ensuring a safer use of the internet to protect their children from potential
poor social skills and high social anxiety (Sampathirao, 2016). However,
expand one's social circle (Bayraktar et al., 2016). Misuse of the internet, such
and higher levels of social anxiety and aggression (Harman et al., 2005).
Overall, the type of internet accessed by children can have both positive and
Pros And Cons of Internet Usage Among Children. Internet access can
children. On the positive side, the internet allows children to update family and
capacity for learning. It also helps children to be more socially involved and
spend more time on physical activities (Khan & Khan, 2022). However, there
internet. Online social networks, which are widely used by children, can
status (SES) does mediate the relationship between internet access and
internet use (EIU) among adolescents, and life satisfaction mediates this
association (Du et al., 2021). Income inequality also plays a role in shaping
2013).
with low SES being associated with excessive internet use and limited access
to digital resources.
play a significant role in shaping the association between internet access and
contribute to the formation of peer cultures and the maintenance of social ties,
blurring the boundaries between online and offline realms (Delicado & de
Almeida, 2011).
power and change, highlighting the need for a normative approach that
advocates for children's rights in the digital environment (Dorsey, 2022). The
teaching them about the internet and the various uses of technology (Parente
sociability. Online communication has become central in the social life of late
aged 11-16. Home computer use for playing games is negatively associated
media use can have both positive and negative impacts on childhood
sociability. On one hand, online games can lead to game addiction, which can
also lead to shallow relationships and risks of online solicitation and cyber-
bullying (Pereira et al., 2020). Overall, the impact of online gaming and social
between internet access and the social development of children. Girls tend to
terms of how they feel about their appearance (McDool et al., 2020). Factors
play a role in determining internet use among both female and male children
of internet use among boys, while girls' internet use is influenced by their
hand, there are concerns that online communication may lead to shallow
associations. Inequality in internet access and use among children and young
people can contribute to a digital divide, which may have implications for their
sociability.
skills and engage more with their environment (Raposo-Rivas et al., 2018).
12
and help young people behave appropriately and protect themselves (Good &
Fang, 2015).
on childhood sociability. (Li, 2022) Adolescents who have good peer social
networks are less likely to experience the harmful effects of internet overuse
positive peers and fewer delinquent peers, can moderate the relationship
(Mesch, 2013).
adolescents. (Chao & Yu, 2021) These findings suggest that establishing and
maintaining positive peer relationships can help protect adolescents from the
sociability.
related, are associated with lower levels of child compulsive internet use (CIU)
(Miltuze et al., 2021). Parents who are more restrictive in their internet
al., 2022). When parents work together to regulate their child's media use and
in monitoring their child's internet use, indicating a need for more effective
Parents living in rural areas have lower levels of internet skills and intervene
(Chang et al., 2016). Adolescents in rural areas have lower levels of internet
counterparts (Mesch, 2013). Urban users have more devices connected to the
internet and engage more in social networking sites, instant messaging, and
file sharing, while rural users use email and e-government services more
frequently. Urban adolescents receive more emotional support via the internet
than their rural counterparts (Dooris et al., 2008). The use of the internet is
their social interactions vary. Some studies suggest that internet use can lead
However, there are also concerns about the negative effects of excessive
internet use, such as internet addiction, compulsive internet use, and impaired
outcomes of internet use, with some enjoying the opportunities and skills they
acquire online, while others face barriers and risks, including exposure to
unknown dangers and harm. It is important for parents to track their child's
internet activities and relationships to ensure a better use of the internet and
protect them from potential harm. Overall, children's own voices and
Theoretical framework
context of this study, the child's personal factors include their cognitive
1986).
suggesting that children's ability to manage their online activities can impact
childhood sociability.
Conceptual framework
Internet Access has been described by (Fauzi & Utami, 2022) as the
ability to connect to and use the internet. It is an essential aspect of our lives,
devices and technologies, such as internet access devices that utilize clock
sociability?
sociability?
Hypothesis
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
analysis.
Research Design
19
using statistical analysis and interprets results by comparing them with prior
study seeks to describe the levels of internet access and childhood sociability
of students. This is apt also since this study seeks to examine the relationship
Research Respondents
whole population.
20
Sampling Design
being chosen. The researcher believes that the freshman have the equal
valid results.
Research Instrument
"disagree," and 1 stood for "strongly disagree." The subsequent Likert scale
Seeking permission from the Adviser. A letter was sent to the Adviser
Data Analysis
sociability of students.
the relationship between Math anxiety and internet access and face to face
sociability of students.
test.
Chapter 3
In this chapter, the collected data is presented along with the analysis
and interpretations derived from the statistical results. The findings are
23
(N=30)
It is shown in table 1 that the domain, internet access has the mean
the time and frequency of people's communications with their family and
Additionally, heavy internet users are more likely to pave a high level of
(Schmidt et al., 2023). Most students reported that social media use does not
reduce the amount of time they spend speaking with family and friends overall
Deviation
Table 2 show the level of children face to face sociability. The mean
with peers.
technologies, such as social media and online gaming, can enhance offline
social relations and improve the ability to socialize with others (Li & Mora,
Sociability
25
means that the observed connection between internet access and childhood
Sociability
Sociability
30
McCutcheon & Bianchi, (2022). The ability of the internet to facilitate constant
allows for the formation of new and dispersed contacts (Khan & Khan, 2022).
Chapter 4
Summary
27
The correlation design was employed by the researcher given that the
variables relate to one another, it makes sense. The purpose of this study was
Paradise Embac National High School, Davao City. These students were
enrolled in school year 2023-2024 who were prone into internet access.
Findings
"High" level.
Conclusions
Recommendations
children.
sociability.
References
Baggett, K. M., Davis, B., Feil, E. G., Sheeber, L., Landry, S. H., Carta, J. J.,
&
30
https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121409354782
Bayraktar, F., Bayraktar, F., Barbovschi, M., Barbovschi, M., & Kontrikova, V.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHILDYOUTH.2016.09.007
4(1).
Camerini, A.-L., Schulz, P. J., & Jeannet, A.-M. (2018). The social inequalities
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817725918
Camerini, A.-L., Schulz, P. J., & Jeannet, A.-M. (2018). The social inequalities
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817725918
Chang, F. C., Miao, N. F., Chiu, C.-H., Chen, P. H., Lee, C. M., Chiang, J. T.,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2016.1190002
Chao, C.-M., & Yu, T.-K. (2021). Internet Use and Adolescents' Physical and
Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11469-021-00631-X
Cordero, D. A. (2023). Letter re: Child Sexual Abuse in the Philippines During
Delicado, A., & de Almeida, N. (2011). Children, internet cultures and online
Desiderio, A., Mancini, A. L., Cimini, G., & Di Clemente, R. (2023). Recurring
Destari, M. R., E., & H. (2022). Internet parenting sebagai kontrol dalam
https://doi.org/10.21009/jkkp.091.03
Diraso Gapsiso, N., & Wilson, J. M. (2015). The Impact of the Internet on
Dong, R., Dong, R., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Z., Lian, S., Lian, S., Liu, Q., Liu, Q.,
Guo,
32
C., & Guo, C. (2021). Family socioeconomic status and the parent-child
https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-019-00356-0
Dooris, J., Sotireli, T., & Van Hoof, S. (2008). Distant friends online? rural and
https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9663.2008.00462.X
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003118824-15
Du, H., Du, H., Zhou, N., Cao, H., Zhang, J.-T., Zhang, J.-T., Chen, A., &
King,
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-021-02632-8
Fauzi, A., & Utami, D. Y. (2022). Implementasi Load Balancing Per address
https://doi.org/10.31289/jite.v5i2.6319
00508-4
Good, B., & Fang, L. (2015). Promoting Smart and Safe Internet Use Among
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10615-015-0519-4
Harman, J. P., Hansen, C. E., Cochran, M. E., & Lindsey, C. R. (2005). Liar,
33
liar: internet faking but not frequency of use affects social skills, self-
https://doi.org/10.1089/CPB.2005.8.1
https://doi.org/10.15388/PSICHOL.2020.15
https://doi.org/10.15388/PSICHOL.2020.15
Khan, M. A. L., & Khan, A. A. (2022). How Does Access to Internet Affect
Child
Khan, M. A. L., & Khan, A. A. (2022). How Does Access to Internet Affect
Child
and Implications for Cognitive Development (Vol. 16). Adv Child Dev
Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60071-3
Lewin, C., Niederhauser, D. S., Johnson, Q., Saito, T., Sakamoto, A., &
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107143
Li, Y., & Mora, R.. (2022). On the use of social networking services and the
54(49). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2042466
Lisin, E. A., Lisin, E. A., Vaulina, O. S., Vaulina, O. S., Petrov, O. F., Petrov,
O.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003118824-40
Mares, M.-L., Stephenson, L. B., Martins, N., & Nathanson, A. I.. (2018). A
house divided: Parental disparity and conflict over media rules predict
35
https://doi.org/10.5937/CM15-27100
McCutcheon, J., & Bianchi, L. M.. (2022). The relationship between Internet
McDool, E., Powell, P. A., Roberts, J., & Taylor, K.. (2020). The internet and
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHEALECO.2019.102274
Miltuze, A., Sebre, S., & Martinsone, B.. (2021). Consistent and Appropriate
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10758-020-09472-4
Nasution, A. R., Meldina, T., Erwanto, E., & Sari, D. Y.. (2022). Efek Game
https://doi.org/10.29240/jpd.v6i2.5697
Novakovic, S., Milenković, S., Srećković, M., Backovic, D., Ignjatovic, V.,
Capo,
N., Stojanovic, T., Vukomanovic, V., Sekulic, M., Gavrilovic, J., Vuleta,
K., & Ignjatovic, V.. (2023). Children’s Internet use and physical and
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163458
Oksman, E., Rosenström, T., Gluschkoff, K., Saarinen, A., Saarinen, A.,
Parente, D. H., Swinarski, M., & Noce, K.. (2011). Socialization To The
Internet:
https://doi.org/10.19030/IJMIS.V13I2.4942
Pereira, S., Fillol, J., & Ribeiro de Moura, P. F.. (2020). Teens’ Online and
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351004107-14
Prananto, I. W., Haryanto, H., Wuryandani, W., & Sayekti, O. M.. (2022).
https://doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v6i2.487
Ramalingam, A., & Kar, S. S.. (2014). Is there a digital divide among school
https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.131894
Rawal, S.. (2020). Pros and cons of internet usage among children research
papers. 9(10).
https://doi.org/10.25215/0304.026
Schmidt, L. A., Jacobs, L. M., & Spetz, J.. (2023). Schmidt et al. Respond.
106(12).
https://doi.org/10.26822/IEJEE.2019349248
Usha, R., K, P., & Surbhi, D.. (2020). Impact of Internet and Technology on
https://doi.org/10.51916/AKSH.2020.V01I02.005
https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1601492
Van Dijk, J.. (2017). Digital Divide: Impact of Access. University of Twente.
38
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.WBIEME0043
APPENDICES
39
Appendix A
DIRECTIONS: For each statement in the survey, please indicate how much
you agree or disagree with the statement by putting a check in the box on the
right side of each statement. There are no right or wrong answers. Your
answers will be kept strictly confidential, and you will not be identified.
40
5 4 3 2 1
peers.
Learning online helps me
develop better communication
skills in face-to-face settings.
Internet access enhances my
ability to maintain friendships.
Appendix B
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
B. Face-to-Face Sociability
I enjoy spending time with friends
in person
I prefer face-to-face
conversations over online
communication
I feel comfortable initiating
conversations with peers in
person.
I notice that the way I interact with
43
-Thank You-
Curriculum vitae
I. Personal Information
Year 2010-2016
Junior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
2016-2020
Senior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
Undergraduate
Year 2010-2016
Junior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
2016-2020
Senior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
Undergraduate
47
Year 2010-2016
Junior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
2016-2020
Senior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
Undergraduate
48
I. Personal Information
Year 2010-2016
Junior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
2016-2020
Senior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
Undergraduate
49
Year 2010-2016
Junior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
2016-2020
Senior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
Undergraduate
50
I. Personal Information
Year 2010-2016
Junior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
2016-2020
Senior High School: Paradise Embac National High School
Undergraduate