S4 Sample3
S4 Sample3
S4 Sample3
Please read the scenario printed below. When the bell sounds, enter the room. You have 14
minutes for your consultation with the patient/relative, 1 minute to collect your thoughts and 5
minutes for discussion. You may make notes if you wish.
Where relevant, assume you have the patient’s consent to discuss their condition with the
relative/surrogate.
Scenario:
Towards the end of a long and busy shift, you were asked by a nurse to administer the first dose of
an antibiotic to a patient, for management of pneumonia.
Following administration of the drug, you realised that you had made an error in identification of
the patient and administered the treatment to a patient with a similar name. This patient, who has
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, has been clinically assessed and observed and has come to
no harm.
Your have reported the error to a senior member of the medical team seeking advice on what to do
and have agreed to speak to the patient to discuss the situation.
Any notes you make must be handed to the examiners at the end of the station.
Scenario:
You were admitted overnight with a worsening of your symptoms of wheeze and breathlessness.
You have a past history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and have smoked approximately
20 cigarettes per day all your adult life. Your recently completed a 1-week course of antibiotics with
a reduction in your sputum production. The sputum is no longer green.
On admission to hospital, the doctor in the emergency department indicated that there were no
signs of infection on examination and that blood testing and chest X-ray were normal. You have
been admitted for treatment with nebulisers, steroids and for further investigation. You were told
that you would not need a course of antibiotics and were surprised when the doctor arrived earlier
to give you intravenous antibiotic treatment.
The doctor has called to explain that there has been a medication error and you have been given a
course of antibiotic inadvertently.
Examiners should advise candidates when there are 2 minutes remaining (i.e. after 12 minutes). If
the candidate appears to have finished early remind them how long is left at the station and
enquire if there is anything else they would like to ask, or whether they have finished. If they have
finished, please remain silent and allow the candidate that time for reflection. The surrogate should
remain until the end of the 14-minute period.
A good candidate would be expected to have agreed a summary plan of action with the subject
before closure. Nonetheless, in discussion, the examiners will usually ask the candidate (after one
minute’s reflection) to summarise the problems raised in the foregoing exchange.
The candidate should be asked to identify the ethical and/or legal issues raised in this case and how
they would address them. The framework for discussion should include consideration of these four
underlying principles:
– Respect for the patient’s autonomy
– Duty to do good
– Duty to do no harm
– Legal aspects (a detailed knowledge of medical law is not required)
Candidates are not expected to have a detailed knowledge of medical jurisprudence. For overseas
candidates in the UK, detailed knowledge of UK law is not required, although candidates should be
aware of general legal and ethical principles that may affect the case in question.
The candidate should recognise his/her limit in dealing with a problem and know when, and from
where, to seek further advice and support.
Examiners should refer to the marking guidelines in the four skill domains on the marksheet.
Examiners are reminded that, during the calibration process, the surrogate should be rehearsed
and specific aspects of the scenario that require clarification or emphasis should be discussed. The
boxes on the next page indicate areas of potential interest in this case which both examiners should
consider, along with any other areas they feel appropriate. Examiners must agree the issues that a
candidate should address to achieve a Satisfactory award for each skill and record these on the
calibration sheet provided. Examiners should also agree the criteria for an Unsatisfactory award at
each skill.
NOT TO BE SEEN BY CANDIDATES
INFORMATION FOR EXAMINERS
Scenario No: Sample 2
Examiners are reminded the areas below indicate areas of potential interest, but are not intended
as absolute determiners of Satisfactory performance. It is for the examiners to agree and record the
specific criteria they will assess the candidate on during the calibration process.
During the interview please use the following question to explore aspects of
communication and ethical interest:
What are the key ethical issues arising from this case?