STUDY REPORTS ADDITIVE CLEANBOOST

Gensets HFO Operated

Boiler HFO Operated
Trucks Diesel Operated

Combustion Technologies USA Combustion Technologies

179 E Main Street # B 683 Mt Pleasant Road
Sandy,Utah 84070 Toronto,Ontario M4S 2N2
Phone (866) 680-3055 Phone (416) 410-3333
USA Canada

www.cleanboost.com www.combustionusa.com
 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE Caterpillar 16CM32 Unit

Protocol fuel consume analysis

Caterpillar 16CM32 Unit 3 Stage 1,Stage 2
Reading data June ´09 Analysis HFO Consume Kg HFO Consume Kg / minute
Non additive minutes 5,280 118,051.10 22.36
Yes additive minutes 3,480 75,499.51 21.70
Difference using Cleanboost HFO -2.965 %
Protocol minutes data taked 8,760.00

Total period
Without additive would be 195,857.506 Kg HFO
With CleanboostHFO would be 190,050.489 Kg HFO
Difference with CleanboostHFO -5,807.017 Kg HFO
% Difference -2.965 %

Caterpillar 16CM32 Unit 3 Stage 2,Stage 3

Reading data June ´09 Analysis HFO Consume Kg HFO Consume Kg / minute
Non additive minutes 5,160 115,598.80 22.40
Yes additive minutes 3,480 75,499.51 21.70
Difference using Cleanboost HFO -3.159 %
Protocol minutes data taked 8,640.00

Total period
Without additive would be 193,560.780 Kg HFO
With CleanboostHFO would be 187,447.058 Kg HFO
Difference with CleanboostHFO -6,113.722 Kg HFO
% Difference -3.159 %
Reading Analisys temperature behaviour in cylinders
Caterpillar 16CM32 Unit 3
Control Stage Temperature cylinders averages ºC Temp Compare ºC Stage 1,Stage 2,Stage 3
Compare phases difference ºC ºC NON additive YES additive NON additive
NON CleaboostHFO Average 1 side A June 19-12:00 to June 24-12:00 396.09 -2.66
NON CleaboostHFO Average 1 side B June 19-12:00 to June 24-12:00 411.96 5.62
YES CleanboostHFO Average 2 side A June 27-20:00 to June 30-12:00 398.75 2.66 -14.44
YES CleanboostHFO Average 2 side B June-27 20:00 to June 30-12:00 406.34 -5.62 -18.07
NON CleaboostHFO Average 3 side A June 30-12:00 to 18:30 413.19 14.44
NON CleaboostHFO Average 3 side B June 30-12:00 to 18:30 424.41 18.07
5.53 MW Gen.Set 3 28.06.09 18:08:38 465 CMG2
High Dev. °C
2.90 Mvar AV 391 °C
394 °C 372 °C
60.0 Hz Low Dev. 317 °C
14.1 kV 403 °C 386 °C
259 A Side A 402 °C 395 °C
257 A
262 A 731 rpm 383 °C 390 °C
0.88

469 °C

24870 rpm

321 °C

311 °C

24852 rpm
Reset
Reset
460 °C

73.5 °C
76.1 °C 77.8 °C 74.0 °C 25.9 bar 382 °C 369 °C
74.5 °C
Side B 395 °C

407 °C 395 °C
393 °C

387 °C 417 °C

Cooling Water Fuel Oil Viscosimat Lub.Oil Charge Air

HT Comp. Tank 84 % Engine in 5.5 bar Viscosity 10.3 mPas Last Bearing 5.7 bar Ambient Air 34.4 °C
HT Engine in 4.7 bar Engine in 138.4 °C Viso. out 139.4 °C Engine in 57.6 °C Ambient Air 1.00 bar
HT Engine in 84.6 °C Rack 85 % L. Dens. 8726 kg/l Circ.Tank 64 % Cooler A in 189.0 °C
HT Engine out 88.3 °C B. Dens. 9592 gr/cm Cooler B in 186.0 °C
LT Comp. Tank 91 % Quality 8210 CCAI Cooler Diff. 0.0 mbar
LT Engine in 3.7 bar Cooler out 2.3 bar
LT Engine in 34.8 °C Engine in 56.7 °C

Start Counter 906 Oper. Hours h

32203 Oper. Hours > 100% h 1 Active Work 206091837
kWh
Reading analysis temperature behaviour turbo sections
Caterpillar 16CM32 Unit 3
Temperature differences turbo section Temp Compare ºC Stage 1,Stage 2,Stage 3 Average temperature turbo section ºC periods
Control Stage Section ºC Non additive YES additive YES additive
NON CleanboostHFO A1 475.4 -1.8 Average 1 side A1 June 19-12:00 to June 24-12:00
NON CleanboostHFO A2 315.3 -4.8 Average 1 side A2 June 19-12:00 to June 24-12:00
NON CleanboostHFO B1 317.4 4.4 Average 1 side B1 June 19-12:00 to June 24-12:00
NON CleanboostHFO B2 482.5 9.1 Average 1 side B2 June 19-12:00 to June 24-12:00
YES CleanboostHFO A1 477.2 1.8 -15.8 Average 2 side A1 June 27-20:00 to June 30-12:00
YES CleanboostHFO A2 320.1 4.8 -7.2 Average 2 side A2 June 27-20:00 to June 30-12:00
YES CleanboostHFO B1 313.0 -4.4 -10.0 Average 2 side B1 June-27 20:00 to June 30-12:00
YES CleanboostHFO B2 473.4 -9.1 -19.8 Average 2 side B2 June-27 20:00 to June 30-12:00
NON CleanboostHFO A1 493.0 15.8 Average 3 side A1 June 30-12:00 to 18:30
NON CleanboostHFO A2 327.3 7.2 Average 3 side A2 June 30-12:00 to 18:30
NON CleanboostHFO B1 323.0 10.0 Average 3 side B1 June 30-12:00 to 18:30
NON CleanboostHFO B2 493.3 19.8 Average 3 side B2 June 30-12:00 to 18:30

5.53 MW Gen.Set 3 28.06.09 18:08:38 465 CMG2

High Dev. °C
2.90 Mvar AV 391 °C
394 °C 372 °C
60.0 Hz Low Dev. 317 °C
14.1 kV 403 °C 386 °C
259 A 402 °C 395 °C
257 A
262 A 731 rpm 383 °C 390 °C
0.88

469 °C Section A1
24870 rpm

321 °C
Section A2
311 °C Section B1
24852 rpm
Reset
Reset
460 °C
Section B2

73.5 °C
76.1 °C 77.8 °C 74.0 °C 25.9 bar 382 °C 369 °C
74.5 °C
395 °C 393 °C

407 °C 395 °C

387 °C 417 °C

Cooling Water Fuel Oil Viscosimat Lub.Oil Charge Air

HT Comp. Tank 84 % Engine in 5.5 bar Viscosity 10.3 mPas Last Bearing 5.7 bar Ambient Air 34.4 °C
HT Engine in 4.7 bar Engine in 138.4 °C Viso. out 139.4 °C Engine in 57.6 °C Ambient Air 1.00 bar
HT Engine in 84.6 °C Rack 85 % L. Dens. 8726 kg/l Circ.Tank 64 % Cooler A in 189.0 °C
HT Engine out 88.3 °C B. Dens. 9592 gr/cm Cooler B in 186.0 °C
LT Comp. Tank 91 % Quality 8210 CCAI Cooler Diff. 0.0 mbar
LT Engine in 3.7 bar Cooler out 2.3 bar
LT Engine in 34.8 °C Engine in 56.7 °C

Start Counter 906 Oper. Hours h

32203 Oper. Hours > 100% h 1 Active Work 206091837
kWh
STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE Semt Pielstick 16PC2.6B Unit
With Cleanboost the efficiency is improved
Semt Pielstick Engine 16PC2.6B 12MW Unit 1 Semt Pielstick Engine 16PC2.6B 12MW Unit 1

Date :August/11/2009 WITH CLEANBOOST HFO Date :August/11/2009 WITHOUT CLEANBOOST HFO
Factor 0.999005047 Factor 0.999005047
DESCRIPTION COUNTER START FINAL COUNTER READING DIFFERENCE DESCRIPTION COUNTER START FINAL COUNTER READING DIFFERENCE
COUNTER HOUR COUNTER HOUR READING HOUR COUNTER HOUR COUNTER HOUR READING HOUR
ACTIVE ENERGY(MWH) 581,240.69 56523.16 581,282.14 56526.87 41.45 3.71 ACTIVE ENERGY(MWH) 581,110.10 56509.71 581,166.91 56514.84 56.81 5.13
HFO COUNTER U1 US Gl 25,522 28,023 2,498.51 Gallons HFO COUNTER U1 US Gl 17,623 21,080 3,453.56 Gallons
FUEL TEMPERATURE 94 Fuel FUEL TEMPERATURE 94 Fuel
DROP VOLUME (GAL) 24.27 Gallons DROP VOLUME (GAL) 33.03 Gallons

GROSS FUEL CONSUMPTION GROSS FUEL CONSUMPTION

FUEL CONSUME : Consume according counter - drops FUEL CONSUME : Consume according counter - drops

Consume = 2,498.51 Gal 9.46 m3 Consume = 3,453.56 Gal 13.07 m3

Drops = 24.27 Gal 0.092 m3 Drops = 33.03 Gal 0.125 m3
6.54 Gal/hr 6.44 Gal/hr
FUEL CONSUME : 2,474.24 Gal 9.37 m3 FUEL CONSUME : 3,420.53 Gal 12.95 m3
666.91 GAL/HR 666.77 GAL/HR
Density (15°C) = 993 Kg/m3 10.9 API Density (15°C) = 993 Kg/m3 10.9 API
HFO Temp = 94 °C 201.2 °F HFO Temp = 94 °C 201.2 °F
Correction factor = 0.9464 Correction factor = 0.9464
A.- NET FUEL CONSUME 8.86 M3 = 8,801.03 kg A.- NET FUEL CONSUME 12.25 M3 = 12,167.02 kg
2,341.62 Gallons at 15°C 3,237.19 Gallons at 15°C

B.- GENERATING ENERGY ACCORDING COUNTER 41,450 KWH B.- GENERATING ENERGY ACCORDING COUNTER 56,810 KWH

B/A A/B B/A A/B

BRUTE FUEL CONSUME 17.70 KWH/Gal 212.33 Gr/kwh BRUTE FUEL CONSUME 17.55 KWH/Gal 214.17 Gr/kwh

RELATIVE INVOICING 96.0% Own utilities average 3.6% RELATIVE INVOICING 96.0% Own utilities average 3.6%

NET FUEL CONSUME : 16.99 KWH/Gal 203.84 Gr/kwh NET FUEL CONSUME : 16.85 KWH/Gal 205.60 Gr/kwh

HEAT RATE CALCULUS HEAT RATE CALCULUS

FUEL : 142,919 BTU/GAL FUEL : 142,919 BTU/GAL

NET HEAT RATE, UNIT : 8,410.28 BTU/KWH NET HEAT RATE, UNIT : 8,483.25 BTU/KWH

Conducted by Operation Plant Department

 Turbo show ash only not hard soot as previous experience
STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE Semt Pielstick 16PC2.6B
With Cleanboost the efficiency is improved
Semt Pielstick Engine 16PC2.6B 12MW Unit 4 Semt Pielstick Engine 16PC2.6B 12MW Unit 4

Date :September/11/2008 WITH CLEANBOOST HFO Date :September/12/2008 WITHOUT CLEANBOOST HFO
Factor 0.999005047 Factor 0.999005047
DESCRIPTION COUNTER START FINAL COUNTER READING DIFFERENCE DESCRIPTION COUNTER START FINAL COUNTER READING DIFFERENCE
COUNTER HOUR COUNTER HOUR READING HOUR COUNTER HOUR COUNTER HOUR READING HOUR
ACTIVE ENERGY(MWH) 540,643.31 51190.7 540,666.04 51192.73 22.73 2.03 ACTIVE ENERGY(MWH) 540,798.55 51205.85 540,820.97 51207.84 22.42 1.99
HFO COUNTER U4 US Gl 900,605 92,005 1,400.00 Gallons HFO COUNTER U4 US Gl 910,420 911,821 1,401.00 Gallons
FUEL TEMPERATURE 94 Fuel FUEL TEMPERATURE 94 Fuel
DROP VOLUME (GAL) 49.89 Gallons DROP VOLUME (GAL) 51.24 Gallons

GROSS FUEL CONSUMPTION GROSS FUEL CONSUMPTION

FUEL CONSUME : Consume according counter - drops FUEL CONSUME : Consume according counter - drops

Consume = 1,400.00 Gal 5.30 m3 Consume = 1,401.00 Gal 5.30 m3

Drops = 49.89 Gal 0.189 m3 Drops = 51.24 Gal 0.194 m3
24.58 Gal/hr 25.75 Gal/hr
FUEL CONSUME : 1,350.11 Gal 5.11 m3 FUEL CONSUME : 1,349.76 Gal 5.11 m3
665.08 GAL/HR 678.27 GAL/HR
Density (15°C) = 993 Kg/m3 10.9 API Density (15°C) = 993 Kg/m3 10.9 API
HFO Temp = 94 °C 201.2 °F HFO Temp = 94 °C 201.2 °F
Correction factor = 0.9464 Correction factor = 0.9464
A.- NET FUEL CONSUME 4.84 M3 = 4,801.19 kg A.- NET FUEL CONSUME 4.84 M3 = 4,801.19 kg
1,277.75 Gallons at 15°C 1,277.42 Gallons at 15°C

B.- GENERATING ENERGY ACCORDING COUNTER 22,730 KWH B.- GENERATING ENERGY ACCORDING COUNTER 22,420 KWH

B/A A/B B/A A/B

BRUTE FUEL CONSUME 17.79 KWH/Gal 211.23 Gr/kwh BRUTE FUEL CONSUME 17.55 KWH/Gal 214.15 Gr/kwh

RELATIVE INVOICING 96.0% Own utilities average 3.6% RELATIVE INVOICING 96.0% Own utilities average 3.6%

NET FUEL CONSUME : 17.08 KWH/Gal 202.78 Gr/kwh NET FUEL CONSUME : 16.85 KWH/Gal 205.58 Gr/kwh

HEAT RATE CALCULUS HEAT RATE CALCULUS

FUEL : 142,223 BTU/GAL FUEL : 142,223 BTU/GAL

NET HEAT RATE, UNIT : 8,328.06 BTU/KWH NET HEAT RATE, UNIT : 8,441.03 BTU/KWH

Conducted by Operation Plant Department

 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET
We prove that in the period July 3-27´08 the fuel consume and the appearance in average MW per
hour in the MAN 18V48B Unit 6 was improve if compare with same Unit 6 and relatives with another
Units.-This stage is to stablish a protocol to confirm the CleanboostHFO capacity to improve the
engine performance and reduce the fuel consume.
Under control conditions is demostrated a fuel economy percent in short period of time.
Often readings start to calculate fuel consumes and MWh at the same load charge the most hours
as can,divide in similar periods,in one CleanboostHFO is injected and not in another to compare.
The results are:
IN THE PERIODS WHERE CleanboostHFO REFORMULATOR IS USED THE FUEL CONSUME
IS LESS THAN THOSE WITHOUT OUR ADDITIVE.
THE EFFICIENCY IS IMPROVED.
Stage 1
Controled conditions load charge at 85% HFO Consume HFO Consume Control
Reading data August 18 ´08 from 00:37 to 05:14 Gallons Gallons / minute phase
00:37:00 - 01:37:38 (60 min) 866.23 14.44 NO additive
01:37:38 - 02:37:00 (60 min) 836.82 13.95 YES additive
02:37:00 - 03:37:00 (60 min) 863.56 14.39 NO additive
03:37:00 - 04:37:00 (60 min) 855.54 14.45 YES additive
04:37:00 - 05:14:00 (37 min) 534.71 14.45 NO additive

NO additive Average HFO consume/minute 14.427 Gallons

YES additive Average HFO consume/minute 14.103 Gallons
Difference HFO -0.324 Gallons
% difference HFO using additive -2.247 %

Controled conditions load charge at 85% Control

Reading data August 18 ´08 from 00:37 to 05:14 Efficiency KWh/Gl phase
00:37:00 - 01:37:38 (60 min) 18.38 NO additive
01:37:38 - 02:37:00 (60 min) 18.46 YES additive
02:37:00 - 03:37:00 (60 min) 18.38 NO additive
03:37:00 - 04:37:00 (60 min) 18.47 YES additive
04:37:00 - 05:14:00 (37 min) 18.38 NO additive

Stage 2
Protocol August 27-28´09 MAN 18V48B Unit 6 : This stage is to stablish a protocol to confirm the
CleanboostHFO capacity to improve the engine performance and reduce the fuel consume according
protocol of August 18.´09
Controled conditions load charge at 95% HFO Consume HFO Consume Control
Reading data August 27-28 ´08 11:35 - 16:35 Gallons Gallons / minute phase
Aug 27 from 11:35 to 16:35 (300 min) 4,855.18 16.18 NO additive
Aug 28 from 11:35 to 16:35 (300 min) 4,777.64 15.93 YES additive

NO additive HFO consume/minute 16.18 Gallons

YES additive HFO consume/minute 15.93 Gallons
Difference HFO -0.25 Gallons
% difference HFO using additive -1.55 %

Controled conditions load charge at 95% Control

Reading data August 27-28 ´08 11:35 - 16:35 Efficiency KWh/Gl phase
Aug 27 from 11:35 to 16:35 (300 min) 18.1064 NO additive
Aug 28 from 11:35 to 16:35 (300 min) 18.3207 YES additive
 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET
Reading Analisys temperature behaviour in cylinders
MAN 18V48B Unit 6
Control phase Temperature cylinders averages ºC Temp Compare ºC
Compare phases difference ºC ºC NON additive YES additive
NON CleaboostHFO Average 1 side A August 27 ´08 11:35-16:35 457.29 21.13
NON CleaboostHFO Average 1 side B August 27 ´08 11:35-16:35 453.06 25.13
YES CleanboostHFO Average 1 side A August 28 ´08 11:35-16:35 436.17 -21.13
YES CleanboostHFO Average 1 side B August 28 ´08 11:35-16:35 427.94 -25.13

August 27 ‘08
16:35
NON additive

August 28 ‘08
16:35
YES additive

Note : Turbo speed increased

 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET
DATA EMISSIONS ANALYSIS TAKED July 2,008

Unit 6 Emissions Analysis Data taked on July 2,008

Desarrollos Energeticos y Ambiente a certificate company to develope environmental protocols under

contract of Combustion Technologies was in charge as independent consulting office to stablish
differences in the stack emissions to compare periods without additive against with additive use.

In the photo Desarrollos Energeticos y Ambiente collecting stack information together as witness
Combustion Technologies and Power Plant Engineers.

Conclusions: In the period with additive use

Emissions and particulate materials reduced under the World Bank parameters,
Positive Oxigen excess what mean more avaibility of gases what improve the combustion

Conducted by: Combustion Technologies

Phone (866-680-3055 ext 2) email [email protected]
www.combust.com www.combustionusa.com
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET Turbo wash observations June 22,July 6 and July 20 ,2008
June 22 NON additive period

5:58am START 2MW 6:19am FINISH 6:27am 14MW

July 6 YES additive period

6:20am START 2 MW 6:40am FINISH 6:44:45am 10MW

July 20 YES additive period

6:03am START 2MW 6:27am FINISH 6:28am 3MW

Note that when more time under additive use period the stack emission with black smog turn
gray and dissapear in less time what demostrate the turbo is clean if compare with previous period
without additive and turn better after more days of the additive use.
This mean the Unit is available sooner to back online .
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET Turbo wash observations June 22,July 6 and July 20 ,2008
June 22 NON additive period

6:31am 17MW 6:33am 18MW 6:40am

July 6 YES additive period

6:47am 14MW 6:52am 17MW 6:56am 18.5MW

July 20 YES additive period

6:29am 4MW 6:30am 9.5MW 6:39am 18.25MW

Note that when more time under additive use period the stack emission with black smog turn
gray and dissapear in less time what demostrate the turbo is clean if compare with previous period
without additive and turn better after more days of the additive use.
This mean the Unit is available sooner to back online .
 MAINTENANCE ENGINE PARTS OBSERVATIONS
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET

Changed injector previous additive use with Injector Cylinder A1 clean under
just 1057 working hours additive use period

Valve sections,injectors,turbo and turbo ring show ash only not hard soot as previous experience

Injection pump without additive show varnish,with the additive improve to the fuel the
maintenance period will be lengthen
 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET

Using Unit 1 MAN 18V48A and Unit 5 MAN 18V48B with low efficiency in the plant taking complete
monthly reports on November 2,008 non additive versus December 2,008 using additive.
This stage is to stablish a protocol to confirm the CleanboostHFO capacity to improve the
engine performance and reduce the fuel consume.

Nov-Dec 2,008 compare position performance in plant: Efficiency Kwh /Gl

Nov-08 NO ADDITIVE
Dec-08 YES ADDITIVE

Nov-08 NO ADDITIVE Dec-08 YES ADDITIVE

Position Unit Efficiency Position Unit Efficiency
1 14 18.59 1 8 18.38
2 12 18.31 2 14 18.31
3 11 18.23 3 4 18.28
4 9 18.16 4 12 18.24
5 7 18.14 5 11 18.22
6 8 18.14 6 6 18.21
7 10 18.11 7 9 18.20
8 6 18.10 8 10 18.11
9 13 18.05 9 5 18.09
10 4 17.91 10 13 18.04
11 5 17.71 11 1 17.57
12 3 17.54 12 3 17.57
13 1 17.46 13 7 17.53
14 2 17.36 14 2 17.43
Plant 18.00 18.01
Plant difference 0.01

Efficiency change compare with itself Genset

Efficiency change
Nov-Dec With Plant Position Unit Diference Position
Unidad 1 0.11 0.10 3 Unidad 5 0.38 1
Unidad 2 0.07 0.06 5 Unidad 4 0.37 2
Unidad 3 0.03 0.02 8 Unidad 1 0.11 3
Unidad 4 0.37 0.36 2 Unidad 6 0.11 4
Unidad 5 0.38 0.37 1 Unidad 2 0.07 5
Unidad 6 0.11 0.10 4 Unidad 14 0.07 6
Unidad 7 -0.61 -0.62 14 Unidad 9 0.04 7
Unidad 8 -0.03 -0.04 12 Unidad 3 0.03 8
Unidad 9 0.04 0.03 7 Unidad 10 0.00 9
Unidad 10 0.00 -0.01 9 Unidad 11 -0.01 10
Unidad 11 -0.01 -0.02 10 Unidad 13 -0.01 11
Unidad 12 -0.07 -0.08 13 Unidad 8 -0.03 12
Unidad 13 -0.01 -0.02 11 Unidad 12 -0.07 13
Unidad 14 0.07 0.06 6 Unidad 7 -0.61 14

IN THE PERIODS WHERE CleanboostHFO REFORMULATOR IS USED THE FUEL CONSUME

IS LESS THAN THOSE WITHOUT OUR ADDITIVE;THE EFFICIENCY IS IMPROVED.
 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE
MAN 18V48B ENGINE 18.9 MW GENSET

This stage is to stablish a protocol to confirm the CleanboostHFO capacity to improve the engine performance and reduce fuel consume.
We prove that in the period July 3-27 ´08 the fuel consume and the appearance in average MW per hour in the MAN18V48B Unit 6 was improve if compare
with same Unit 6 and relative with another units,these improves are confirmed in protocol January 2,009 Unit 1 A model and Unit 5 B model,under control
conditions is demostrated a fuel economy percent in short period of time,often readings start to calculate fuel consumes and MWh at the same load charge the
most hours as can,divide in similar periods,in one CleanboostHFO is injected and not in another to compare.
The results are : IN THE PERIODS WHERE CleanboostHFO REFORMULATOR IS USED THE FUEL CONSUME IS LESS THAN THOSE WITHOUT OUR
ADDITIVE : THE EFFICIENCY IS IMPROVED .
Unit 1 on Jan 10 & 11 Readings HFO consume,MW & Engine load %

Density HFO 988.2 Kg/m3 Gallon = x 1 / 264.20079 HFO gallon = 3.7400337 Kg

Hour Operating hours Counter HFO kg Consume kg Gallons Counter MW MW Generated Active load MW Load % Permit % Notes
15:29 a 17:30 29979 106,705,220.00 7,180.00 1,919.61 1,305,454.95 33.60 16.62 90.0 100.0 Jan 10 NO ADDITIVE
17:30:00 29981 106,712,400.00 1,305,488.55 16.72 90.2 100.0 Jan 10 NO ADDITIVE

17:40 a 19:22 29998 106,767,180.00 6,040.00 1,614.83 1,305,742.59 28.64 16.42 88.6 100.0 Jan 11 YES ADDITIVE
19:22:00 30000 106,773,220.00 1,305,771.23 16.56 89.5 100.0 Jan 11 YES ADDITIVE

Controled conditions load Reading

data Jan 10 & 11 HFO Consume Consume / minute Efficiency KWh/Gl

15:29 a 17:30 ( 119 mins ) 1,919.61 16.13 NO additive 17.50

17:40 a 19:22 ( 102 mins ) 1,614.83 15.83 YES additive 17.74

Unit 5 on Jan 10 & 11 Readings HFO consume,MW & Engine load %

Density HFO 988.2 Kg/m3 Gallon = x 1 / 264.20079 HFO gallon = 3.7400337 Kg
Hour Operating hours Counter HFO kg Consume kg Gallons Counter MW MW Generated Active load MW Load % Permit % Notes
13:31 a 17:32 31169 81,708,960.00 13,890.00 3,713.57 402,117.37 67.26 16.62 90.0 100.0 Jan 10 NO ADDITIVE
17:32:00 31173 81,722,850.00 402,184.63 16.72 90.2 100.0 Jan 10 NO ADDITIVE

13:28 a 17:29 31183 81,756,830.00 13,810.00 3,692.18 402,348.53 67.01 16.62 89.5 100.0 Jan 11 YES ADDITIVE
17:29:00 31187 81,770,640.00 402,415.54 16.58 90.0 100.0 Jan 11 YES ADDITIVE

Controled conditions load Reading

data Jan 10 & 11 from 13:30 to 17:30 HFO Consume Consume / minute Efficiency KWh/Gl

13:31 a 17:32 ( 241 mins ) 3,713.57 15.41 NO additive 18.11

13:28 a 17:29 ( 241 mins ) 3,692.18 15.32 YES additive 18.15
 STUDY REPORT HFO ADDITIVE USE Boiler application : Cleaver Brooks CM600.200 year 2,001

Cleanboost HFO protocol reading analysis June 22 - July 17,2009 protocol

Cleaver Brooks CB600.200 boiler year 2,001
Control Days Hours HFO Consume Gallons
Period Operated Hour Period
No additive 14.1506 315.9167 21.48 6,785
YES additive 10.2635 210.6667 19.94 4,200
Consume percent less using Cleanboost -7.17 %

Periods time calculus Start date End date Start hour ( - ) End hour ( + ) Day Fraction Total days Total hours Minutes
No additive June 22 July 5 1:50 5:45 0.163 13.163 315.917 18,955.00
YES additive July 7 July 17 7:40 14:20 0.278 9.278 210.667 12,640.00

Cleanboost HFO reading analysis August-October ´09 Gallons HFO consume

Cleaver Brooks CB600.200 boiler year 2,001
Control
Period HFO consume
No additive 43,306 HFO Gallons
YES additive 40,720 HFO Gallons
Consume percent less using Cleanboost -5.97 %

Note:because season on October plant production increased with less HFO consume
This report is to confirm protocol on Jun-Jul ´09

Improve quality of the HFO the oxygen-fuel mixing permit use less fuel
 STUDY REPORT DIESEL ADDITIVE USE Isuzu FVR Truck year 2,000
Protocol fuel consume analysis

Cleanboost reading analysis Sep 1-12 2,009

Isuzu FVR Truck year 2,000 tank unit capacity 55 gallons , Truck 1 and Truck 2
Date Stage Diesel refill gallons Gallons consume Odometer Kms Kms travel Control period
NO additive Truck 1
September 1 Stage 1 55.000 3.448 109967 22.00 NO Add
September 2 Stage 1 3.448 10.001 109989 88.00 NO Add
September 3 Stage 1 10.001 7.132 110077 59.00 NO Add
September 4 Stage 1 7.132 6.129 110136 46.00 NO Add
Total period Truck 1 26.710 215.00 NO Add
YES additive Truck 1
September 7 Stage 2 6.129 110182 YES Add
September 9 Stage 2 2.964 3.229 110206 19.00 YES Add
September 10 Stage 2 3.229 9.385 110225 87.00 YES Add
September 11 Stage 2 9.385 110312 YES Add
Total period Truck 1 12.614 106.00 YES Add
Date Stage Diesel refill gallons Gallons consume Odometer Kms Kms travel Control period
NO additive Truck 2
1 de Septiembre Stage 1 55.000 10.000 27586 93.00 NO Add
2 de Septiembre Stage 1 10.000 27679 NO Add
5 de Septiembre Stage 1 25.990 4.863 27920 37.00 NO Add
Total period Truck 2 14.863 130.00 NO Add
YES additive Truck 2
September 7 Stage 2 4.863 27957 15.00 YES Add
September 8 Stage 2 27972 87.00 YES Add
September 9 Stage 2 28059 63.00 YES Add
September 10 Stage 2 27.400 28122 81.00 YES Add
September 11 Stage 2 27.400 9.828 28203 90.00 YES Add
September 12 Stage 2 9.828 28293
Total period Truck 2 37.228 336.00 YES Add

Efficiency analysis With Yes additive

Stage 1 - Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Improve Improve Km/Gls
Kms / Gallon No additive Yes additive Kms/Gl Percent
Truck 1 8.0494 8.4034 0.35 4.2119 % More Kilometers per gallon
Truck 2 8.7466 9.0255 0.28 3.0903 % More Kilometers per gallon

Fuel economy analysis With Yes additive

Stage 1 - Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Improve Improve Gls/Kms
Gls / Kms No additive Yes additive Economia Gl/Km Percent
Truck 1 0.1242 0.1190 -0.0052 -4.3971 % Less fuel per Kilometer
Truck 2 0.1143 0.1108 -0.0035 -3.1888 % Less fuel per Kilometer

Note : days without information Unit on maintenance or different routine

 STUDY REPORT DIESEL ADDITIVE USE Hino 1526-500 Truck year 2,009
Protocol fuel consume analysis

Cleanboost reading analysis Oct 12 - 29 2,009

Hino 1526-500 Truck year 2,009 tank unit capacity 55 gallons
Date Stage Diesel refill gallons Gallons consume Odometer Kms Kms travel Control period
NO additive
Oct 12 Stage 1 55.000 0.000 22782 NO Add
Oct 13 Stage 1 0.000 22930 NO Add
Oct 14 Stage 1 0.000 23086 156.00 NO Add
Oct 15 Stage 1 33.44 33.440 23241 155.00 NO Add
Total period 33.440 311.00 NO Add
YES additive
Oct 16 Stage 2 14.75 14.750 23388 147.00 YES Add
Oct 17 Stage 2 16.00 16.000 23541 153.00 YES Add
Oct 19 Stage 2 16.10 16.100 23697 156.00 YES Add
Total period 46.850 456.00 YES Add
NO additive
Oct 27 Stage 3 16.98 24904 NO Add
Oct 28 Stage 3 16.22 16.220 25058 154.00 NO Add
Oct 29 Stage 3 17.70 17.700 25216 158.00 NO Add
Total period 33.920 312.000 NO Add

Efficiency analysis With Yes additive

Stage 1 - Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Improve Improve Km/Gls
Kms / Gallon No additive Yes additive Kms/Gl Percent
Compare 9.3002 9.7332 0.43 4.4482 % More Kilometers per gallon

Fuel economy analysis With Yes additive

Stage 1 - Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Improve Improve Gls/Kms
Gls / Kms No additive Yes additive Economia Gl/Km Percent
Compare 0.1075 0.1027 -0.0048 -4.6553 % Less fuel per Kilometer

Efficiency analysis With Yes additive

Stage 2 - Stage 3 Stage 3 Stage 2 Improve Improve Km/Gls
Kms / Gallon No additive Yes additive Kms/Gl Percent
Compare 9.1981 9.7332 0.54 5.4975 % More Kilometers per gallon

Fuel economy analysis With Yes additive

Stage 2 - Stage 3 Stage 3 Stage 2 Improve Improve Gls/Kms
Gls / Kms No additive Yes additive Economia Gl/Km Percent
Compare 0.1087 0.1027 -0.0060 -5.8173 % Less fuel per Kilometer
Note : days without information Unit on maintenance or different routine
Note : This report is to confirm the protocol September 1-12 , 2009
STUDY REPORT DIESEL ADDITIVE USE Isuzu FVR Truck year 2,000
Hino 1526-500 Truck year 2,009

September - October 2009