J Electacta 2015 03 081
J Electacta 2015 03 081
J Electacta 2015 03 081
Electrochimica Acta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/electacta
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Fe2O3-reduced graphene oxide (RGO) composites were successfully fabricated via a facile microwave-
Received 16 January 2015 assisted reduction of graphite oxide in Fe2O3 precursor solution using a microwave system, and
Received in revised form 10 March 2015 investigated as anode material for sodium ion batteries (SIBs). Their morphologies, structures and
Accepted 11 March 2015
electrochemical performance were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction,
Available online 12 March 2015
Raman spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, respectively. The
results show that the RGO addition can enhance the electrochemical performance of Fe2O3-RGO
Keywords:
composites. Fe2O3-RGO composite with 30 wt.% RGO exhibits a maximum reversible capacity of
Fe2O3-reduced graphene oxide
microwave assisted synthesis
289 mA h g1 at a current density of 50 mA g1 after 50 cycles and excellent rate performance due to the
sodium ion battery synergistic effect between Fe2O3 and RGO. The high capacity, good rate capability and excellent cycle
anode material performance of Fe2O3-RGO composites enable them a potential electrode material for SIBs.
ã 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction high specific capacity and good cycling stability for SIBs remains a
great challenge.
Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) represent a key class of battery Intensive efforts have been made to explore the electrode
architecture that has emerged as a prime candidate for energy materials for SIBs, involving carbon-based materials [14], alloy
storage devices due to their high energy density and long cycle [15], metal oxides and sulfides [16,17]. Among the available
lifetime [1–4]. However, the high cost and possible supply risk of alternative anode materials, Fe2O3 has recently been considered to
lithium resources significantly limits the large scale applications of be a promising electrode material for SIBs due to its excellent
LIBs [5–7]. As a potential alternative, sodium ion batteries (SIBs) chemical stability, high capacity, easy fabrication, low cost and
have recently attracted much attention due to the natural nontoxicity [18–22]. In contrast to layered materials, sodium
abundance, lower cost, and relatively low toxicity of sodium, storage in Fe2O3 is mainly achieved via a reversible conversion
and the similar chemical properties including ionicity, electroneg- reaction, by forming Fe nanoparticles dispersed in Na2O matrix
ativity and electrochemical reactivity between lithium and sodium [23]. However, the reaction is accompanied by considerable
elements [8–13]. Unfortunately, the diameter of sodium ion is volume change upon repeated charge–discharge, which causes
about 55% larger than that of the lithium ion, and only a few host the poor electrical contact, electrode pulverization, and continuous
materials for LIBs are suitable to allow the sodium ion intercalation growth of the solid electrolyte interface (SEI) [24–26]. In addition,
and deintercalation. Therefore, exploring electrode materials with Fe2O3 has a poor electrical conductivity, making the electrochemi-
cal redox reaction difficult. As a result, Fe2O3 suffers from the
relatively low capacity and poor cycling stability, which limits its
commercial potential.
Currently reducing the size and constructing open channels in
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 0571 86872475; fax: +86 0571 86872475.
the electrode materials have been suggested to overcome the
** Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 21 62234132; fax: +86 21 62234321.
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (X. Liu), [email protected] (L. Pan). aforementioned problems [18–22,27]. Reversible capacities of
1
The two authors contributed equally to this work. 100–400 mA h g1 were obtained for the nanostructure Fe2O3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.081
0013-4686/ ã 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
X. Liu et al. / Electrochimica Acta 166 (2015) 12–16 13
However, the poor conductivity and structure pulverization still volume and mean pore diameter were determined by the
exists for pure Fe2O3 anode materials. Another particularly Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method.
attractive strategy is to design and develop hybrid electrode
materials based on carbon. Recently, various carbonaceous 2.3. Electrochemical Measurement
materials such as carbon nanotubes and carbon fiber have been
reported as the matrix to support the Fe2O3, which not only For electrochemical testing, the as-prepared composites,
enhances its electrical conductivity, but also provides a good Super-P carbon black and polyvinyldifluoride, with weight ratio
accommodation of the large volume change [28,29]. Graphene of 80:10:10, were homogenously mixed in N-methylpyrrolidone
(normally obtained by chemical reduction of graphene oxide (GO) solvent to produce slurry. Then, the resultant slurries were coated
and called as reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with a unique two- on a copper foil using a doctor blading method. Finally, these
dimensional conjugated chemical structure should also be electrodes were dried at 120 C in vacuum for 12 h. Coin-type cells
considered as an ideal matrix in the SIBs because of its large (CR2032) were assembled in a glove box (MB-10-compact,
specific surface area, excellent electrical conductivity and superior MBRAUN) under argon atmosphere with oxygen and water of
chemical stability [30,31]. RGO-based composites have been less than 0.5 ppm, using sodium metal foil as the counter and
demonstrated with the excellent electrochemical performances reference electrode. Whatman glass fiber membrane and 1 M
[32–38]. Therefore, development of composite material based on NaClO4 electrolyte solution dissolved in a mixture of ethylene
Fe2O3 and RGO should be a promising method to enhance the carbonate and propylene carbonate (1:1 w/w) were used as
electrochemical performance of Fe2O3. separator and electrolyte, respectively. Galvanostatic charge–
Herein, a fast strategy was developed to synthesis the discharge cycles were performed using a LAND2001A battery test
Fe2O3-RGO (FG) composites by a microwave-assisted reduction system in the voltage range of 0.005–3 V. Cyclic voltammetry (CV)
of GO in Fe2O3 precursor solution using a microwave system, and was performed using an electrochemical workstation (AUTOLAB
the effect of the RGO amount on the electrochemical properties of PGSTAT302 N) in a voltage range of 0.005–3 V at a scan rate of
FG composite was investigated. Microwave irradiation can 0.2 mV s1.
facilitate mass production in a short time with little energy cost
[39] and form an intimate contact between Fe2O3 and RGO, which 3. Results and discussion
is crucial for the formation of electronic interaction and
interelectron transfer at the interface [40,41]. Such a micro- The HRTEM images of as-prepared Fe2O3 are shown in Fig. 1(a)
wave-assisted reaction is seldom employed to synthesize FG and (b). Fe2O3 nanoparticles are relatively uniform and dispersive
composites for SIBs. The as-prepared FG composites were used as with diameters of 4–8 nm. The lattice spacing measured for the
anode materials for SIBs and they exhibit improved capacity with crystalline plane is 0.368 nm, corresponding to the (0 1 2) plane of
good cycle stability compared to pure Fe2O3. a-Fe2O3 (JCPDS 33-0664). As shown in Fig. 1(c), when RGO is
introduced, the Fe2O3 nanoparticles are uniformly anchored on
2. Experimental RGO sheets in the FG composite to form a conductive network
structure, which favors fast electronic and ionic transport in
2.1. Synthesis of Fe2O3-RGO composite electrode reactions. The morphologies of FG-10 and FG-50 (not
shown here) are similar as that of FG-30. Fig. 1(d) shows the
GO was synthesized using the method reported in our corresponding selected area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) of
previous works [41,42]. In a typical synthesis, 1.98 g Fe the FG-30. The SAED pattern shows clear diffraction rings, which
(NO3)39H2O, 0.74 g urea and 0.3 g GO were dispersed in 150 ml can be well indexed as a pure a-Fe2O3 phase.
aqueous solution using magnetic stirring and ultrasonic treat- The XRD patterns of Fe2O3 FG-10, FG-30 and FG-50 are shown in
ment to form a homogeneous mixture. Subsequently, 20 ml of the Fig. 2. The peaks in the pure Fe2O3 pattern at 24.1, 33.2 , 35.6 ,
solution was sealed in a 35 ml microwave tube and heated at
150 C with a maximum microwave irradiation power of 100 W
for 10 min using a microwave system (Explorer-48, CEM Co.). The
resultant precipitate was filtered, washed with deionized water,
and finally dried in a vacuum oven at 80 C for 24 h. The as-
synthesized FG composites with 90, 70 and 50 wt.% Fe2O3 by
changing the amount of Fe(NO3)39H2O were labeled as FG-10,
FG-30 and FG-50, respectively. Pure Fe2O3 and RGO were also
synthesized by a direct microwave assisted reaction for compari-
son. As described in our previous work [43], most of the GO can be
reduced to RGO under microwave irradiation and the obtained
RGO has a C/O ratio of 9.12, which is close to the value (10) of
that achieved by the hydrazine reduction method.
2.2. Characterization
Fig. 3. Raman spectra of Fe2O3 and FG-30. Fig. 5. CV curves of FG-30 electrode.
X. Liu et al. / Electrochimica Acta 166 (2015) 12–16 15
Fig. 8. Rate performances of FG-10, FG-30 and FG-50 electrodes. The test was
conducted after 50 galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles at a current density of
50 mA g1.
h g1, respectively, much higher than that of pure Fe2O3 and RGO.
Although FG-30 electrode delivers a low initial Coulombic
Fig. 6. The first and second charge–discharge curves of Fe2O3, FG-10, FG-30 and FG- efficiency, it increases dramatically upon cycling, and reaches
50 electrodes. over 94% after 5 cycles and 99% after 10 cycles, as shown in Fig. 6,
indicating the excellent reversibility of sodium insertion in the FG
electrodes.
Pure Fe2O3 delivers an initial discharge capacity of 486.8 mA h g1
The rate performances of the FG-10, FG-30 and FG-50 electrodes
and a reversible capacity of 287.3 mA h g1, showing a 59% initial
were investigated as illustrated in Fig. 8. Among these electrodes,
Coulombic efficiency. When RGO is introduced, the initial
FG-30 electrode demonstrates best rate performance and delivers
reversible capacity increases to 375.7 mA h g1 for FG-10 and
reversible capacities of 251.9, 173.8, 89.8, 56.7 and 32.8 mA h g1 at
reaches a maximum of 389.3 mA h g1 for FG-30. The relatively
current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1 and 2 A g1, respectively. The
high reversible capacity is mainly attributed to the network
capacity recovers to 288.4 mA h g1 when the current density
structure and higher specific surface area. However, when the RGO
returns back to 50 mA g1. The result reveals that the FG
content is further increased, the initial reversible capacity
composites show a high rate capability and structure stability
decreases to 324.2 mA h g1 for FG-50, which may be due to the
even at a very high current density.
relatively low capacity of RGO (136.1 mA h g1). Therefore, the
The enhanced electrochemical performance of FG composites
introduction of RGO with appropriate amount into Fe2O3 can
can be attributed to the synergistic effect between the Fe2O3 and
improve the capacity of Fe2O3.
RGO, which is similar to those reported for LIBs [48,49]. Firstly, the
The cycle performances of the RGO, Fe2O3, FG-10, FG-30 and
conductive network structure in the FG composites can ensure
FG-50 electrodes at a current density of 50 mA g1 are shown in
efficient and continuous electron transport [34,50]. Secondly, the
Fig. 7. Pure Fe2O3 exhibits a poor cycle performance and the
RGO can act as the buffer layer to accommodate the volume
reversible capacity decreases to about 16 mA h g1 after 10 cycles.
expansion and prevent pulverization of Fe2O3 during charge and
On the contrary, RGO shows excellent cycle performance and the
discharge process [30,34]. Finally, the large surface area of the FG
reversible capacity almost does not decline after 50 cycles. When
composites can provide a sufficient electrode–electrolyte interface
Fe2O3 and RGO are combined together, the FG composites exhibit
to adsorb sodium ion and facilitate the rapid charge-transfer
improved cycle performance compared to pure Fe2O3. And the
reaction. However, excessive RGO will stick together and signifi-
cycle performance of the FG composites is dependent on the
cantly block the channels for sodium ion diffusion, leading to the
proportion of RGO. With the increase in RGO content, the cycle
decreased electrochemical performance of FG composites [32].
performance enhances. However, with further increase in RGO
content, the cycle performance slightly deteriorates. The optimal
4. Conclusions
value of RGO is 30 wt.%. After 50 cycles, FG-10, FG-30 and
FG-50 electrodes maintain capacities of 72.2, 289 and 192.8 mA
In summary, FG composites were successfully fabricated via a
facile microwave-assisted reduction of GO in Fe2O3 precursor
solution using a microwave system, and investigated as anode
materials for SIBs. The results of electrochemical experiments
demonstrate that the FG composites exhibit excellent cycle
performance with a high capacity and good rate capability due
to the synergistic effect between Fe2O3 and RGO. A maximum
capacity of 289 mA h g1 at a current density of 50 mA g1 after
50 cycles is achieved for the FG-30. Even at a high current density
of 1 A g1, a capacity of 56.7 mA h g1 is maintained. The high
performance of FG composites provides a potential feasibility for
the anode materials of SIBs.
Acknowledgments
Fig. 7. Cycle performances of RGO, Fe2O3, FG-10, FG-30 and FG-50 electrodes at a Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation
current density of 50 mA g1. of China (No. 21401180, 21276087) and the Basic Research Project
16 X. Liu et al. / Electrochimica Acta 166 (2015) 12–16
of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No. 14JC1491000) [25] S.M. Xu, C.M. Hessel, H. Ren, R.B. Yu, Q. Jin, M. Yang, H.J. Zhao, D. Wang,
is gratefully acknowledged. a-Fe2O3 multi-shelled hollow microspheres for lithium ion battery anodes
with superior capacity and charge retention, Energy Environ. Sci. 7 (2014)
632–637.
[26] J.X. Zhu, Z.Y. Yin, D. Yang, T. Sun, H. Yu, H.E. Hoster, H.H. Hng, H. Zhang, Q.Y. Yan,
Appendix A. Supplementary data Hierarchical hollow spheres composed of ultrathin Fe2O3 nanosheets for
lithium storage and photocatalytic water oxidation, Energy Environ. Sci. 6
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in (2013) 987–993.
[27] J. Qu, Y.X. Yin, Y.Q. Wang, Y. Yan, Y.G. Guo, W.G. Song, Layer Structured a-Fe2O3
the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Nanodisk/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites as High-Performance Anode
electacta.2015.03.081. Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5 (2013)
3932–3936.
[28] Z.L. Liu, S.W. Tay, Direct growth Fe2O3 nanorods on carbon fibers as anode
References materials for lithium ion batteries, Mater. Lett. 72 (2012) 74–77.
[29] M.H. Wu, J. Chen, C. Wang, F.Q. Wang, B.L. Yi, W. Su, Z.F. Wei, S.N. Liu, Facile
[1] Y.H. Xu, Y.J. Zhu, Y.H. Liu, C.S. Wang, Electrochemical Performance of Porous Synthesis of Fe2O3 Nanobelts/CNTs Composites as High-performance Anode
Carbon/Tin Composite Anodes for Sodium-Ion and Lithium-Ion Batteries, Adv. for Lithium-ion Battery, Electrochim. Acta 132 (2014) 533–537.
Energy Mater. 3 (2013) 128–133. [30] B.H. Qu, C.Z. Ma, G. Ji, C.H. Xu, J. Xu, Y.S. Meng, T.H. Wang, J.Y. Lee, Layered SnS2-
[2] C. Luo, Y.H. Xu, Y.J. Zhu, Y.H. Liu, S.Y. Zheng, Y. Liu, A. Langrock, C.S. Wang, Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite-A High-Capacity, High-Rate, and Long-
Selenium@Mesoporous Carbon Composite with Superior Lithium and Sodium Cycle Life Sodium-Ion Battery Anode Material, Adv. Mater. 26 (2014)
Storage Capacity, ACS Nano 7 (2013) 8003–8010. 3854–3859.
[3] X.S. Zhou, L.J. Wan, Y.G. Guo, Synthesis of MoS2 nanosheet-graphene [31] D.W. Su, H.J. Ahn, G.X. Wang, SnO2@graphene nanocomposites as anode
nanosheet hybrid materials for stable lithium storage, Chem. Commun. 49 materials for Na-ion batteries with superior electrochemical performance,
(2013) 1838–1840. Chem. Commun. 49 (2013) 3131–3133.
[4] M.J. Hu, Y.Z. Jiang, M. Yan, Scalable synthesis of Fe3O4/C composites with [32] W. Qin, T.Q. Chen, L.K. Pan, L.Y. Niu, B.W. Hu, D.S. Li, J.L. Li, Z. Sun, MoS2-reduced
enhanced electrochemical performance as anode materials for lithium-ion graphene oxide composites via microwave assisted synthesis for sodium ion
batteries, J. Alloys Compd. 582 (2014) 563–568. battery anode with improved capacity and cycling performance, Electrochim.
[5] S.W. Kim, D.H. Seo, X. Ma, G. Ceder, K. Kang, Electrode Materials for Acta 153 (2015) 55–61.
Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium- [33] Y.G. Liu, Z.Y. Cheng, H.Y. Sun, H. Arandiyan, J.P. Li, M. Ahmad, Mesoporous
Ion Batteries, Adv. Energy Mater. 2 (2012) 710–721. Co3O4 sheets/3D graphene networks nanohybrids for high-performance
[6] H. Pan, Y.S. Hu, L. Chen, Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for sodium-ion battery anode, J. Power Sources 273 (2015) 878–884.
large-scale electric energy storage, Energy Environ. Sci. 6 (2013) 2338–2360. [34] Z.L. Jian, B. Zhao, P. Liu, F.J. Li, M.B. Zheng, M.W. Chen, Y. Shi, H.S. Zhou, Fe2O3
[7] A. Ponrouch, E. Marchante, M. Courty, J.M. Tarascon, M.R. Palacin, In search of nanocrystals anchored onto graphene nanosheets as the anode material for
an optimized electrolyte for Na-ion batteries, Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (2012) low-cost sodium-ion batteries, Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 1215–1217.
8572–8583. [35] Y. Jing, E.O. Ortiz-Quiles, C.R. Cabrera, Z.F. Chen, Z. Zhou, Layer-by-Layer
[8] L. Wu, X.H. Hu, J.F. Qian, F. Pei, F.Y. Wu, R.J. Mao, X.P. Ai, H.X. Yang, Y.L. Cao, Hybrids of MoS2 and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Lithium Ion Batteries,
A Sn–SnS–C nanocomposite as anode host materials for Na-ion batteries, J. Electrochim. Acta 147 (2014) 392–400.
Mater. Chem. A 1 (2013) 7181–7184. [36] X.Y. Zhou, J. Zhang, Q.M. Su, J.J. Shi, Y. Liu, G.H. Du, Nanoleaf-on-sheet CuO/
[9] D.D. Yuan, W. He, F. Pei, F.Y. Wu, Y. Wu, J.F. Qian, Y.L. Cao, X.P. Ai, H.X. Yang, graphene composites: Microwave-assisted assemble and excellent
Synthesis and electrochemical behaviors of layered Na0.67[Mn0.65Co0.2Ni0.15] electrochemical performances for lithium ion batteries, Electrochim. Acta
O2 microflakes as a stable cathode material for sodium-ion batteries, J. Mater. 125 (2014) 615–621.
Chem. A 1 (2013) 3895–3899. [37] P.C. Lian, J.Y. Wang, D.D. Cai, L.X. Ding, Q.M. Jia, H.H. Wang, Porous SnO2@C/
[10] T.Q. Chen, Y. Liu, L.K. Pan, T. Lu, Y.F. Yao, Z. Sun, D.H.C. Chua, Q. Chen, graphene nanocomposite with 3D carbon conductive network as a superior
Electrospun carbon nanofibers as anode materials for sodium ion batteries anode material for lithium-ion batteries, Electrochim. Acta 116 (2014)
with excellent cycle performance, J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014) 4117–4121. 103–110.
[11] T.Q. Chen, L.K. Pan, T.A.J. Loh, D.H.C. Chua, Y.F. Yao, Q. Chen, D.S. Li, W. Qin, Z. [38] Y.Z. Jiang, T.Z. Yuan, W.P. Sun, M. Yan, Electrostatic Spray Deposition of Porous
Sun, Porous nitrogen-doped carbon microspheres as anode materials for SnO2/Graphene Anode Films and Their Enhanced Lithium-Storage Properties,
lithium ion batteries, Dalton Trans. 43 (2014) 14931–14935. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4 (2012) 6216–6220.
[12] T.Q. Chen, L.K. Pan, T. Lu, C.L. Fu, D.H.C. Chua, Z. Sun, Fast synthesis of carbon [39] Y. Zhu, S. Murali, M.D. Stoller, A. Velamakanni, R.D. Piner, R.S. Ruoff, Microwave
microspheres via a microwave-assisted reaction for sodium ion batteries, J. assisted exfoliation and reduction of graphite oxide for ultracapacitors, Carbon
Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014) 1263–1267. 48 (2010) 2118–2122.
[13] W. Wang, B. Jiang, L. Hu, S.Q. Jiao, Nasicon material NaZr2 (PO4)3: a novel storage [40] G. Zhu, L.K. Pan, T. Xu, Z. Sun, One-Step Synthesis of CdS Sensitized TiO2
material for sodium-ion batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014) 1341–1345. Photoanodes for Quantum Dot-Sensitized Solar Cells by Microwave Assisted
[14] K. Tang, L.J. Fu, R.J. White, L.H. Yu, M.M. Titirici, M. Antonietti, J. Maier, Hollow Chemical Bath Deposition Method, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 3 (2011)
Carbon Nanospheres with Superior Rate Capability for Sodium-Based 1472–1478.
Batteries, Adv. Energy Mater. 2 (2012) 873–877. [41] X.J. Liu, L.K. Pan, T. Lv, G. Zhu, Z. Sun, C.Q. Sun, Microwave-assisted synthesis of
[15] B. Farbod, K. Cui, W.P. Kalisvaart, M. Kupsta, B. Zahiri, A. Kohandehghan, E.M. CdS-reduced graphene oxide composites for photocatalytic reduction of Cr
Lotfabad, Z. Li, E.J. Luber, D. Mitlin, Anodes for Sodium Ion Batteries Based on (VI), Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 11984–11986.
Tin-Germanium-Antimony Alloys, ACS Nano 8 (2014) 4415–4429. [42] X.J. Liu, L.K. Pan, T. Lv, G. Zhu, T. Lu, Z. Sun, C.Q. Sun, Microwave-assisted
[16] S. Yuan, X.L. Huang, D.L. Ma, H.G. Wang, F.Z. Meng, X.B. Zhang, Engraving synthesis of TiO2-reduced graphene oxide composites for photocatalytic
Copper Foil to Give Large-Scale Binder-Free Porous CuO Arrays for a High- reduction of Cr(VI), RSC Adv. 1 (2011) 1245–1249.
Performance Sodium-Ion Battery Anode, Adv. Mater. 26 (2014) 2273–2279. [43] T. Lu, L.K. Pan, C.Y. Nie, Z.J. Zhao, Z. Sun, A green and fast way for reduction of
[17] L. David, R. Bhandavat, G. Singh, MoS2/Graphene Composite Paper for Sodium- graphene oxide in acidic aqueous solution via microwave assistance, Phys.
Ion Battery Electrodes, ACS Nano 8 (2014) 1759–1770. Status Solidi A 208 (2011) 2325.
[18] B. Koo, S. Chattopadhyay, T. Shibata, V.B. Prakapenka, C.S. Johnson, T. Rajh, E.V. [44] X.J. Liu, L.K. Pan, T. Lv, Z. Sun, C.Q. Sun, Visible light photocatalytic degradation
Shevchenko, Intercalation of Sodium Ions into Hollow Iron Oxide of dyes by bismuth oxide-reduced graphene oxide composites prepared via
Nanoparticles, Chem. Mater. 25 (2013) 245–252. microwave-assisted method, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 408 (2013) 145–150.
[19] S.B. Wang, W. Wang, P. Zhan, S.Q. Jiao, Hollow alpha-Fe2O3 Nanospheres [45] Z.L. Jian, M.B. Zheng, Y.L. Liang, X.X. Zhang, S.M. Gheytani, Y.C. Lan, Y. Shi, Y. Yao,
Synthesized Using a Carbon Template as Novel Anode Materials for Na-Ion Li3VO4 anchored graphene nanosheets for long-life and high-rate lithium-ion
Batteries, ChemElectroChem 1 (2014) 1636–1639. batteries, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 229–231.
[20] M. Valvo, F. Lindgren, U. Lafont, F. Bjorefors, K. Edstrom, Towards more [46] Q.J. Xiang, J.G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity
sustainable negative electrodes in Na-ion batteries via nanostructured iron of graphene-modified titania nanosheets, Nanoscale 3 (2011) 3670–3678.
oxide, J. Power Sources 245 (2014) 967–978. [47] B. Philippe, M. Valvo, F. Lindgren, H. Rensmo, K. Edstrom, Investigation of the
[21] Y.Z. Jiang, M.J. Hu, D. Zhang, T.Z. Yuan, W.P. Sun, B. Xu, M. Yan, Transition metal Electrode/Electrolyte Interface of Fe2O3 Composite Electrodes: Li vs Na
oxides for high performance sodium ion battery anodes, Nano Energy 5 (2014) Batteries, Chem. Mater. 26 (2014) 5028–5041.
60–66. [48] M.B. Zheng, D.F. Qiu, B. Zhao, L.Y. Ma, X.R. Wang, Z.X. Lin, L.J. Pan, Y.D. Zheng, Y.
[22] B. Sun, S.J. Bao, J. Le Xie, C.M. Li, Vacuum-annealing-tailored robust and flexible Shi, Mesoporous iron oxide directly anchored on a graphene matrix for
nanopore-structured gamma-Fe2O3 film anodes for high capacity and long life lithium-ion battery anodes with enhanced strain accommodation, RSC Adv. 3
Na-ion batteries, RSC Adv. 4 (2014) 36815–36820. (2013) 699–703.
[23] P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, J.M. Tarascon, Nano-sized [49] I.T. Kim, A. Magasinski, K. Jacob, G. Yushin, R. Tannenbaum, Synthesis and
transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion electrochemical performance of reduced graphene oxide/maghemite
batteries, Nature 407 (2000) 496–499. composite anode for lithium ion batteries, Carbon 52 (2013) 56–64.
[24] X. Gu, L. Chen, S. Liu, H.Y. Xu, J. Yang, Y. Qian, Hierarchical core–shell [50] W. Wang, L.W. Hu, J.B. Ge, Z.Q. Hu, H.B. Sun, H. Sun, H.Q. Zhang, H.M. Zhu, S.Q.
a-Fe2O3@C nanotubes as a high-rate and long-life anode for advanced lithium Jiao, In Situ Self-Assembled FeWO4/Graphene Mesoporous Composites for
ion batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014) 3439–3444. Li-Ion and Na-Ion Batteries, Chem. Mater. 26 (2014) 3721–3730.